UNITED STATES DEP&IMEHT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Research Administration Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine Division of Fruit; Insect 3a#©stigations
University of Califoraia
Hauaii Ageieulteal EKpsrlmsnt Statioa
TexritoriaX Board of Agrieulttaee and
Hawaiian S
PlantersG Association Station
IHVESTIGATIOKS OF FRUIT H*IES IN HAWAII
QUARTERLY REPORT
July 1 » September 309 X953
0O0
WORK PK.OJ1OT I-a-5«
Biology-Ecology of-Fruit Flies ia Iteaii* N« E-» Flitters Fro3©ct Leader, ?■« S* Messenger,. U» of Calif ° Agr* Experi ment Station*
The oriental fruit fly host properties of the Hilo variety of pineapples
was determined to be very comparable to those established for the -parent sfiiDoth .• Cayenne'pineapple* Both of these pineapples have approximately the same re-
■siatanee~ to fruit fly development.
No field infestation was discovered in the
Hilo form of smooth Cayenne but fruits exposed to eaged gravid oriental fruit
'fiies for a period of i week us re found to contain, upon sm average, 2«9X2 eggs and lst«instar larvae per fruit»
From 344. pineapples of the Hi'j.6 variety that
wer» exposed to the ea^-ed fruit flies in the indi;.cecl opposition study, only 1 absomally saaall f mit" fly ^as reared■• This easie from the 3hell of an infected fruit» This .s.urwiv'or.; repT&s&at^d the only complete pre-isaaginal develt obtained from an- ©striated total of 419^328 eggs-
The raass' ou3.ti2re of opiirie para..sits a of ls^gisg^g^H£ typc-s has been 'reduced in scops «inoe the tessdaation of avz shipiseat/s to the Pacific aoriihwast iby trial wpoa the cherry fruit fly• Weekly shipJioxruS have been made to Yakima?
Washington sinca May 25* These i-jsre eoncl^iidd nith the 10th shipsoont 6n July 27«> Altogether a grand total of 33^4^4 parasitss ware dispatched to this points la (an ©ffo?t to SotersBise to what extent the opiino parasites might ba attracted to the mm? spscies of fruit flies; present In Bolivia* a. shipa^at was sent there at the rsqiiest of Dr» Alex. Maaaro*
This .consisted of slightly more than
2.* 000 laboratory-reared adults of the 4 2an^^3Uj&&&3& typess
h 2* £g^^iSSSS» 2a (Slam) and 0« (Kqw Caledonia,*}
The 30-day meti:^l eugsnol traps on "^ausi indioatsd a decline in fruit fly
recoverids largely influenced ty' -the drop in catches at Wailusu Aiagust provided the highest trap returns of the qiaarter wliih th© greatest trap increase occurring ■at Waiaea whsii tlis trap 'recoveries were 3 times higher than the preceding months. Bioe.\insatiq cabinet
Tfee cabinets performed uel3. during the quarter• ■ No laaintsaanc© problems enc-oiiatsred other than roiXtine adjustmesits end upkeep of the refrigeration systems*.
Studies with the -three California sites concerned winter and. early spring
conditions*
33xe Santa Paula climate Has too ©ool for any f&mt fly activity
other .^han.ovipositiozi by nature £3^ies of the three* species» The -resultant fruit isEifestations .were quits louo On the other hand, under Orange conditions*
-^hile temperatures x-jer© too' cool for production of progeny of the oriental fruit
and-the >Sefilterranean fruit ^ly9 the-ss £Li$s'wftre able to issfost fruits
fairly heavily.. Further, the melon fly was able to infest eucisnbers all through the auarter, and from such infestations inteiajlittattt adult production was noted..
Similar^ at ^allb^ook,. late winter temperatures permitted fairly heasy SgggSsia and capitate oknosition, though ho progeny production. Here again tte neloa fly waTahE to produce a. feu adults occasionally during the period. From tuese results it would appear that the -winters at. these two southern CaUfornaa sites are marginal for the oriental and Mediterranean fruit files, but jifcre timely suitable for the melon fly*
The two v-asas sites, Weslaco and Winter Haven, permitted & moderate degree of trait fly reproduction by all three species• Infestations occurred almost continuously throughout the winter at Winter Haven, i&srs £•• jggsgii^i progeny i lot? l b d fi ntata progeny in ©i?en lesser^anotinti were r'eoorored in maters, and C» cantata Melon fly progeny emerged in much greater"-abundance*
$&© Weslaco spring-was
entirely .suitable for tho Ikwaiian fruit fliesf with more or less continuous infestations and the. promotion of largo nonbers of progeny. Hhile no F«2 -.
. ^
m. »«.
i
-a _• _.
.
.1.-...3
a?» ™.
?i*
o
and the remaining one was dissected ©ye by eye to determined the degree of infestation present
in the fruits after sucli an expo sura* Iii order to determine to what extent the field fruits might be infested 4 whole pineapples and shells* from four other we?:© isolated ±a holding boxes each
k
A total of 225 fruits were received from iCauai at which 153 were exposed to the caged oriental fruit flies and 72 directly isolated upon arrival.* Of the
former, 7.2 were held whale and a like amount was shelled and isolated* A total of 9 fruits ware dissected to determine the numbers of eggs and larvae in them*
No pupal recovery vias ioad»3 from shells or fruits isolated directly 'from the field* No pupal recovery -vjas made from the uhol® fruits isolated af-fcer 7 days^
ea3postx?3 to" ths caged oriental fruit flies and only 11 pupae were recovered from the shells of the 72 fruits similarly exposed". The pupae appeared abnormal^ small and only one tasdersized saals fly emerged from this total* The nine fruits that were dissected after 7 days5 exposure to t!2s fruit flies yielded a total of 26,212 eggs and Ist-iastar larvae or approximately 2912o4. ^ fruit* This would indicate that there \te?e approximately £&9932& eggs deposited in the 344. fruits exposed in the induced ovipositiou test with the shells an$ whole fruits containing near eqml amounts«
The tests corroborated ©srHar studios which bad indicated that the Hilo strain resists fruit fly development to about the same extent as its parent smooth Cayenne varie'fcy
Line Project 1-gl"6-$*
Effect of Climate axtd Other^Factors .oa the
of FguJt^Ries fol&K^i gzider Field Coaditiong^ "So" "iu» Terr* "'ffi' "of Ag«'
.B*E«F«»Q«,
'%© 30«day methyl eugenol traps on Kauai showed a substantial decline ia Hy collections during the zooath of September, but si£G® the Wailtm trap sit© Mb been responsible fo? the greatost, fly recoveries a2^ apps^ciabl© reduction lihat ocly f^oia fruit inf©ct=/cions dovalo^ad 5.e the previous t the last of th© B*-2 ach:(lt3«
In oontraet to "i*« rather msagoi* parforsanco on the part of these tyo spacies* the melon fly iaas abls to infest a considerable avaabsr of cucumbers during the quarter o The psreait stock was able to iafest 20 otit of 39 cucusabers placed in this periods l^rom tlsss-3 infestations 159 adults c-ias-rged from st, total of 1*291 pupae*. Also during this time 81 adults and /»53 pupa© were colloeted from the previous quarter's iofestutions* For thssa productions the developeaental periods ■were considerably extended, va?y3ag from 51. tp 57 days* This reflects the cool coiaditiona under which these Jtlies vere subjected» Some dead pupae usre collected from infestations of tfas previous qiiarter caused by the P-l generation* This generation was unabl© to infest eny cucisabsrs during the. present period* probably because of retarded seanal develojacoat of *ch3 rsc@ntly produced 'adults»
Bo.. 2 - Fallbrook. Gallfcrnle (Mar* - May 1953)* Conditions for late winter and early spring were studied during the quarter*
Weekly ssaan tempsziaturesJ, as sibilated in the cabiaets, were:
-arch,^ 50°, 54°*
54°, 57% 54-°y April, 53% 54% 57% 57°j 1-fey, 65°? 60°, &M 58°«
Hesaee ,it ean
ba seen that the first half of ths psrioci was bslov/ the 57° threshold-ll
From mid-April on* however, conditions improved gradually* Relative humidities during the quarter varied over wide diurnal ranges, for example*, £rom 20$ to
100$, with treekly msans in the sixties and seventies* As in th© case of the Orange, California^ study, U* S« Weather Bureau reports indicate that while the winter of 1953 i» *he Los Angeles area was somewhat warmer than normal* the early spring period* simulated iix this cabinet;, was cooler than usualo £Lso? for the months of April and May, heavy dry winds were reported* The oriental fruit fly parent stock was able to infest 27 of 37 papayas placed during the quarter aad only oa© r?ru5.t was suhmitte'd* Ms .fruit yieMsd 51 piipao,- bu.t i-'io F-2 .progeny adults* Ssireral carry-ovor pzpae w©r6 also collected; but again no adults«.
i%}y of the ciarront
infestations are esrpectoS to j/Ield adults in the following q
Kin^ fruits iiore placsd for the Msditerr&r.c3£s f-nit flj parent stocky and eIjs: wS2ls infestod* O^iy one infestation yio3.dod adults* Those numbsrsd 16 dlt from f 8 pupae, vaih a dsv^lop^^n^al period of 42 days^ adxilts X8 As with ths oriental fruit fly4 tli-ars will probably be coiao product ion in tba ssesii from eurrsnft iafestatioas*
While the aselon fly parents were able to infest 2& of 36 cisoussbsrs placed-.,
only 1 infestation carried through currently* yioldli&g 14 adults from 3Q4
pupae* . ifeny of the reminder will oarry-oTrer* A considerable nusib&r of adults* 128 out of 973 pupae? v&re collected currently from last quarters acti^it^o KJo activity Has noted ylth respget to jggc^bljE© progeny stocks»
The overall cool conditions of this site duriag the period studied ia reflected in the prolonged developmental periods, law yioldflj ©nd poor progeny builcwup, for all t'hres sp&eies-
Gsbiaaet No» ?&
Heslaco., Togas»
(March — Msiy^ 1953)
For this sits the early spriag ueslcly. mean temperatures ran as follows s
8l°»
Hencje^ all thrcagii tlis quarter tsinperatiira- conditions were suitable 3?or
fruit fly deve3jojs»sat and activity*
Husidities, agsia \dth wide diurnal ranges,
tended .from higher to lows? vsluea ao the auartsi- 1
Farsnt oi'iesital fruit'fly stocks peyfozaaed --all* 113. of 3& fruits ^ero infested, producing in the quarts:? 2S925 adults froza 5^790 papae* Also in th®
qusrtsr nore recovered 263 adii3.ts and 2.679 pirpas orrilginatiag"f3?om tfes qtLB3?ts?
pasta B«3VQ3,o]CS2ental periods for tlisse isfestations droppsd from 30 days early in the quarter to 20 dayss" in I4sy* The orieatal fruit fly P-l progeny stock
inf3stsd 19 of 2A fruits submitted currently, producing 175 pupa© but no adialts. Wo F-2 adult activity was noted o
Parent Mediterranean fruit flies infested 12 of 13 fruits^ yielding 759
adults and 1*091 pupae*
As with d&^^aji&, the growth periods for these Infests-^
tions dropped from 24 days in March to 21 days in April and May* No yields from previous infestations uas observed* The F-l stock infested all of 12 fruits placed, resulting in SV7 adults from 909 pupae« Development hare took about the same time as with ths parent progeny* Agst£n9 no F«-2 activity was noted a although immature F-2 adults were beginning to accumulated touard-s the end of the quarter*
Parent melon flies infested 32 of 38 cucumbers for a current production of
790 adults and I97tft pupae*
311 adults from I5144."pupae»
to 16 days in
^ss Ou3t.i3ge of Fgult Flies
S« Shimon©/ W« E« Flitters) ~~
.
The production of both oriental and meloa flies ma sufficient to -meet all demands* Sharing August and September such improved production of the Mediter- ^ renean fruit fly yas attained« This was gratifying since the winter months with their acconrDanying high tomidities and cooler nights ha^e aJ^ra^s presented" a combination* of iTaetoys that have been regarded as detrimental to Madfly pro» ductionw
Personnel changes iacurred"l^y the resignations- of both Miss Poro'fcS^ Kiimoto and Miss Graes Yasuda ^esre negotiated without Katerially affecting the production of fruit flies o Both of tha omployeoo resigaod ia order to oontiat© studies in their respsctivQ fields at imivsrslixies on ths mainland Unitsd Stttes
Since the dofflassd foa? m©lon flies has materially decreased^ a eors?©3ponding reductiojs in its crult^re Ssas bsen mad©» Fino^agh breeding stocks are being ■ maintained la order that prodizotion can be stepped up if iacreassd demands for this species should
l
The total pap^l prcduction for each of tae three species of ffcu&t flies for the months of Jalyj, Atsgust esd Septsmbsr &s& tbltd bl^ •Month
Oriental ffruit fli©s
557*696
Sop-tenter Totals Grand total
Line Project I«a-5«-7*
W§J6&3££~ 1,643.726
,
Msloa fly
Mediterranean felt
l
193.»842
^Im 699,472
«~SaSl ' 429,029
2,772,227
Production of Fruit Fliss Tagged with RadioEe.ti^e Material
Liae Project 1-^-5-8»
Hi2l2glr"^
of
in scoDt2
ton*
Etoisg the month of July we dispatched 4 separate shipments tfcais altogether
totaled 105.0&6 parasites*
Sines vth© initial shipment "in May we iiavo dispatches 33*464 parasites for
introduction and Iibe3?ation in Washington Stata to determine their attraction
to the cherry fruit fly* SMpping mortalities Save "been eseeptipmXly light, but to da*e no inforasation has been supplied concerning the biological aspects of the liberations*
A request for a shipment of available fr-oit fly parasites uas: receiirad from Dr* Ales: 2taro in Bolivia- -H T«as hopsd that ps^h&ps ose of the opiine parasite that had proven ©ffectira againgt the oriental and Mediterranean $wX% flies da
Haiiaii woi&d provo ecgpaalSy successful in aiding in the coafcyol of tfcs JMfly speoi^s of ^Si§i§tSi^ii* aafi other fruit flies in Bolivia*
A shipment eoasistinK of A Omu.3 lonaicaudat»*»as^ty?De0 TDressntly beissg culturad in the laboratory t..j3re dispatched to Mr. T* R* (Mrcbsier? Belt^il Marylsjads, who in tux-n repacked and Transshipped tham t.o Bolivia^ The consisted of parasites just in o-qoss of 2«QOQ*
bank of parasite brseeling cages has been reSisceS to 2.6, or 4 eagss for
pareat stocks of eacla. of t'ns A lon^ggjjdatus types* • .Fruits previously infested by the oriental fruit flies are ©xpoasci to tfca parasites twice each vraek^ re mold and isolated in the convert:lo:o.al n^Jiner and the mp&rla recovsrod during
screening is placed in jars of sand and p'Xacod in liaaite scs?3en cagos tzntil
eiaergsnce is complete•
Some eonsiSer,atioa is presently being gi^rea to modifica-
tioa of the old sgrstssi of supplying honey to \&e parasites hjj' ths application of feair streaks of this s^Estaaco aesoss fche glass front of ths cages*
IWX ~(H* Miyabara aBd T« Yamaha) Ling P^ojec^.^^
M&ssst && 'Sfasi From 134 lots of fruits (2*627 fmits), sighing 152,309 grama., 8,15?
puparia were recovered during this quarter*
From these emerged 4*032 Do
8 ^, 71 0 d^li 3 S^i^M? a total of 6*929 or 84*% emergence* Of the esnergenee^ 58»2% 2* dggggQrlaa H*6£ vhs £* £SEifefeSL®ad 27«2% parasites• 0» ooj^lS£ accounted for 90^ of the parasitlzation index* Tiia average siango infestation index of fruits collected from 13 localities
was 70 08 puparia per 1000 grams of fs-uits*
Haiku mangoes had the Irlghest
infestation index of 112 puparia p-sr 1000 grams of fruits« uther localities iv^ith comparativsly Mgh indices tiara Xzjd Valloy with 95ff and Kaupo irlth 71 pupar3^L per 1000 grams of fruits* Only Kaupo asasgoes had a high rate of parssitisation (5?.o\%) *sith most of the other areas showing slightly below 20JS-
parasitization»
(
35 & 16)
Eight lots of cotton collected from Sihsi^. Saiialu3.fi Piumene, sztd
this qiiartsr were frss from fruit fly infestation* (pa 17)
,
Kosesppl© collected .at Ka3.?/aa Imd a high infestation iiades: of .393 F&paria
per 10-00 grams•
?xjo.£ these pupaivia. 0*6% c;? the emeygonce wera pa:?®sites »w_(p» 1©)
From peach eo3.lectS.ons at Iltila (2900'}^ ths liifestation inderc vsas 323 p©s? XQQO grais^* O* 3-^irfeta ^as by far the laore dominant ^j^ei (^)
^J
acconsntel fosT^^iSraGitss h^s-3 22p of tib.
i
Sis lots of pspajsis collsctsd at Kaupo wers free of fruit .fly infestation
while guavas and Esaagcss collectad in closes prosiaiity had iafsstatioh indicas
of 94-»5 and 71 paparia per 1000 grans of fruits reespscuivelyo (po 1)
From 21 lots of guanas, tlia average indos: taas 98---S mo-aria j^e:? 1D00 graias
uith 50o7% pstr^eitizaticno ipo 18)
On pages £P *^o S3 ar© complete suaaaarles of fniit iafeststions and
parativ© emssrgsneas of the ffrult Hy species and parasites by hostts f^om 194-9 to 1953* Thsse graphs show tha iafsstation tread that started relati^el^r bi
in 1949 9 then gradually dropped to a 3.ow poiat in 1952, and t
in 1953 3Ja SBOst fruits*
15-
5/19 6130 TisMka 200*
ifeago
1714
20
193 103
0 1
0
5/20 6/5
450? 400'
Mango «
1813 124.5
20 13
289 53
29 15
0 0
1 2
0 0
4S0?
«
1370
15
13B
15
0
0
0
*
6/17
«
H
«
6220
«
6240
a
«
Total
6219 6239 9
5/25
•
*
a
n
»
«
"
°
»
45O5
»
w
1475"
1200
H
"«
Kaupo
1417
1134
12^7
n
1176
'
6339 Wallete 200s
12,117
Itogo
" 6/29
7/6
7/13
Total
n
n
6204 6212
G «
6236
^
6227
11
b
»
n
0
20
0
16
3d.
21
134
S60
180
57
1
6
0
1724 S203
15 15
«
»
"
1^2
15
173
15
82
/,0
62 206 506 242
»
7/6 8 7/13 ® Total
6/2 " 11 »
*
»
»
6208
6209
«»
6222 6223 6232 6233
r l? « b
14
Haiku
6153 6154 6155 6156 4
*
o » h o
Poansa® 100 s * n » 3 •'»
Ptemss©
»
I46O
«
«
« w » »
^fesngo f' « «
1962
.
1368 1468
1913
15
15
15 15
58
13
« "
6/29
0
' 16,144 165 1112 444 16 2
50
* «
« JJ
0
0
15
» «
» ■»
0
0
15
63.71 6100
« »
0
0
1302
6/S 6/15
6201 6202
2
0 0
15
a t?
0 0 9
tj^q
°
52*1
71
16^0
15 15
u
T>
4&
5*9
0
41
1679
6200
20,0
192
35 25
«
5
0
£^ 123
«
32
4
.7
n
6181
4
45.5
0
41
Mango
a
0
25
0 0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
335
146
0
23.2
85
0
224 188 338 308
24 ££
37
0
0 0
0
0
0.
1
0
0
0 0
0
69
16 8 6 1
0
0
G
6039
60
59
39
0
0
0
25.0 H.,5 1*2
9.1
0
0
33«2
4
0
0
0
26*0
2784-1225
2214000 .37 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
■ 5*4 2O9
13
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0
11 42,3
43
22 133 348 116
15 15 15.
15.
4»0
0
0
0
1602 2435 15BS 1414
38
0
0
0
210
15 15 15 15
0
2 1
0
24*915
2173 1474 r/28 2X32
112
0
0
68 116 71
12O8
16 3
34
60
6
0 0
15
30
9*6
0 0
3.799
52
3
0 0
50-
04 95
0
86
5
1
159
500s
6/22
0
0
105
1245 1630
°
0
0
0
15
Haiku R
0
0
40
102
15
y^
614.7 6148
0
0
151 43
35*0
1913
6/1 ■°
20
00 4 5*3 0 1.7
n K
.Wailutai
6
62
%*$
0
24oO
1512356000 15 151 69 0 0 0 15 106 58 0 0 1
» »
w
36
8
6
47
R
»
1
39
0
119
6184 ^03
0
150
15 15
O
15
•
6/22
n
U
0-
1347
1799 .1305 3474
«
12
19
54OOOOO
nan « fe o ? n R
«
15
97
S2e6 34»8
15S6
6349 6174 6175
6183
i5
137 6
142^
6/1 6/8 9
6/15
Total
6196
o
619?'
7/15
I.
616?
Ksnpo »
0
7/1
jpv
6134 6166
45 30o9> 233
88 55
67 75
5
35
230
Bl 85 108
92
16,0 3J
101 210
0
28
43
0 0 1 0
1 5 24 3
4^3 29 3O6 140 4*1 293 2o5 114
2
128
9*6 122
00 0 0 0 0 0
0
• 0
0
33 B5 0 0
10
£ 0
8*0S
I
rs
0
0 9"8S
12
1*5
&
0
1*9
S£ 62
1%
Z£
OS
9*
0 «v
6T
-ft!
&6
*-J *
0
Z 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
c-
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
X
0
•{TOT- t
0
£*9&
o
6?
..
0
z 0
0
0
0 0 0 0
I
if
£"$£
0
LZ
ret
0 0 0
0" 0 0
a
O'OOX
3*92
OS 0
9 II
0 0 0
y
G a
0
0
0
*
ra
£6
89 29 58
0 0 0
t
8
OVi"
g
0
"v9
6*'
¥%£ "6*£T
S& &££
TOT
0 0 0
0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
o0 0
0
0
'..: :...-S',
LZLft
T5T
es z
0
"7
Li,
0^
&
Q
1ST
9£
57 ST
A
7€t
' 33
X£i
0
Q
19
*?£ T£ 9£
X€ 1?9 Z£
' 6 .6
--:'-- •
iOOS
cv:,t.9 I
jOOC3®1 BE * ••
85/iX •'584X
;
a/9
9X//,
^*^^i
6^9
0
1!
u
«
aOOT be
0S6C 8(T6X 5XO8J
u
9X/1
Z i;
.v,2
6120 •b!21
6229
0
0 0
0
? «
0
0 0
0
29005
a
0
0 0 0
0
480*-
»
0 0
0
M^I
?A
0 0
30
Cotton
m 100^
0 0
15
0 0.
553
t?
rail©:,.
0 0
15
Cotton
2
x 0 CheL
g
Los. \%
0 0 1 0 J
0 0 0 0 0
0'
u
. v
0
4
0
0 0 G
m
s 33 IS
43.2 Z%2
54
21.9 .22.2
323
36*3
a
2 100e0 2 1CK)00
14
49
u 21
A 9 0
0
17
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0
6
0 0
0
76
400
57
23
0
33 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
21
525
134 125 4S? 431
0
0
31*7
0
6(6.4
0 0 0 0 0
0
clC'C
V£Z OWJ
i95 TUa'7
0 0
test otc •;
i;rr
-e ~iOT r.cox ©85-TX SS:*"*XX E
a
u
cOO5
COS5
5t8
5/5
8XT9
i/5
£2X9
era
1601 ox
u
02 02 OX
99
a
a
u
a u
HtOO5
u a
u
^^X'E^2:
68X9 A8T9 X£T9
a
(1
9X/9
n
6T/5
c
[ Hog
Batg.
JfeiL
?/6 7/13
6229 6230
Total
6
3
7/15 "
Total
6/29
Halloa «
6231
Klpshs&ia
Xao
»
4&
1000
14
0
0
0 0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
21
»4
0 0
0 0
0 0
12 0
9*1 0
0
0
0
12
4.9
0
0
0
;
7,1
o
o
o
14
0
15 50 20
■Kfc» applis
2965
65
530
35 20
10 25
55
35
10 4
216 158
Mb, apple
&&3 622
4320 > Avocado
0
1
219 1?J,
Xao
7/6
6&S S&
5/21 6X35 WaSliee
500s .ferc-cado
20011 £,
2395
227
6"
108
39
30
0
v.
134 Tots! eoll©ctionfi
2,,627 Total £?idts
152,309 Totel wsight in grasas 8,157 Total pupae 53« 5 IndSK isiiDae per 1000 graaa
^ 6^929
Sssa
Sss M Saa
m 249 354
500 s
6244
6179
5OO» »
Haiku
6243 2
6/(3
J96» Frait
4o6£ - 1,009 2« 87 0t
71 0a
4.9f> - 1,750 (5.
27»2 Sanasites
0
0
0
3
16
24
? 1CO«0
93
17
%
250 254
APPIS IHFESlATIffll
r
1950 to 1353
par 1000 grams of fruit
Psresntage of adult emergono©
500
400
60SS
.-■;■■
20?
5
1949 3
"T"
.'
: ■
■ ■
■ -rl& psr
1000 grams of firalt
,
r
1M9 to X953.
I-fflGO
Ptsparia par 1000
:, ■:•:
■ -
V
.
■
! '
■
'
......
■ ■
.
* -'■■
3.953
■
..
J
0
300
graaaa o-f f 0, oonhxl
.
(Maul, To H»)
nmsmxm - 1949 to 1953
700
soo
10Q Bmrceo&aga
pa? 1000 of fruit
adult ©mar-genes
-; -
300
.
I
:
•
.'■" ■
■
■/■,■■■;
.
19«
])• dorsal!£
2' :-. ■ ■ .- ■
r
;" .
-
'
■
■
■■"■.
-
■
i
.
-
.
-
■■■■■ ■■
I ■
-
C* canitata
-■' -1
Puparia par 1000 grans of fruit
nas 19.49 ~ 1953
zoo
M^ii^ T^ H,)
adult
of fruit
$00
■
-,
■-
%
.
■■•>:-■'.
■
v / ,.
-
■
■
...
.
20
YA
I 3.9A9
I ■
O,
Induct
Pi^aria per 1000 gran^ of S?ait
-24-
Line rgoject I~a~5«»3o
Effect of Climate and Other Factors on
of Fruit Flies in Hawaii Under Field. Conditions*.
(Maul* T* Ho)
Meteorological data aceumlated during the quarter are given on
^
25* Tempsratures at all stations during this quarter were -within the limits for favorable fruit fly development* Rainfall for this quarter t*ss very l with the greatest amount occurring in August*
Pupal expsrimants were discontinued as the summsr months app2\5s.ehed» A feu experiments carried over from May xrfere completed in July witfe the following results 2
Pupal
Haleak&la
7030'
Haleafeila
5500^
Stela
3750'
44-45
41-44
26-30
Mult orisntal f?ui*& fly population densities remained at high levels during this qiaartss?* 3!n Juiy, thyes of five areas in vjhioh citronella traps gtve being
operated established new record catches*
Th3 August and Septsesber fly cuitch©s
were high compared to that, of prev:lous years* Good host availability* tritk mangoes and guavas in season during the qisarter,1 i^is responsible* Population trends for ths different trapping s:ltes aro g5-V3n on page 26 and is. th© graphs on pages 27 to 29? Sll
Record c«tches wsra ^.de at fiva of tbs E$t!iy3. eugeaol trapping eites ■ during this quartes?* A record catch of 10,49S fllos I®? trap day at 15iupo uas mad© in September* Th:is record «as slightly mor-o 'dhssn last yearns reooird catch of 10 /IS «Ties per tratj day* Makac?.!*?.© had a rocorcl catch during September9 Kailm^in August, and X^fcalna end I^ilssa in July* JfethyX ougsnol trap data and graphs ars suffinariaed on pages 20 '^ 32> inclusive©
DATA FOR Mini SS3OTOHS
\\\
WMSAU
7030?
HAZBABAZA
53ft)*"
\
POFUMTICM TKMDS ~ MSUX
Waila&u
Xao Talley
Haiku
200s
199)
&aa*
109
94 94 to
81 202
&P?»
271 232 232
144 157 323 63? 520 616 326 109
Jtsto Sejre*
23*5 2S;5
Jazs,
• 153 213 81 6? 67 75
J«3y
30
19
46
E®0* 1952
35
Jsmo
27
Fob,,
75 139 65 , _
,r
33 ^x 21
Jctne
1!
iteea, •*-sJS>
uatls
Feb. I-fesr*
-'
U M
140
320 222
67 30
451 1313 521 506 506
6?
170
5/JL
617
U6 159 261
49
123
524
175
202
191
50
159 89
3X2
36
123
%
56 1.-32 132 182
2S42Ji& 2iv 217 .199
153
337 344
IS IB
.
.
22 22
224 138 93
61 26
^ft 38 28 39 — -
53
15 IS
26
25
58 j*z*
63
.121 396
239
200
36^
Of1.1*'
J~'%
i?7
202
169
Zm
161 626
286 795
359 5"o9
30I
3g5>
170
/.62
JL.!fL
3t>/i
306 205
3-57 4S8
424 410
Septc
3JJL
4^S
132
623
167
Jt^e 3u&
££t
284
614
39
A66
153 162
290
270 31
76 175
111
199 423
666
45
1951
245
291 2A2 188 1A1 132
Ki£La
2?6
'ig'V
233 •{*•£
459
-:tr^
"'
555
I?! q;y
r
I p
& wM
.'
..
'8 S: ^*»*
■
til
:
1 |
1
','
.
OH
*-* H f'l i^t
I
O
§L
•-■.
POPDMTIOBT TEMD3, I&O vcu
800
K1333
fi
.
1950 1951 1952 - 1953
-700
■600
V 500
400
■200
-100
Apr*
Ifeg
dy
Get.
Ugc«
POPOMTION TBEHDS, MUI Jfetfcyl augsnol Flies jyer trap day
Igg2
Jvosq July Mgo Saptc Oet.
NcfiTo D®e«
Walfae© lehaina Hoaokohau Kihei Kaupo Makaalac» ftahika Kailue, Olinda Pala 2009 JSO1 300' 25° 2003 2100» 7501
511
1669
1147 2492
1030
1222
1393
1583
1425 1316
1746
695
56
629
1193 1155
481 299
.3844
?10
91
5439
6602
1152 998
xm
5S23
787,
72S 351
1430 1577 1740
254 374
10418 253.6
599
2061
2071 12S3 1559
3&4
1942
702
3483
532 580
X332 578 458 107
H39 940
268 393
15 35
127 312
12^J 1455 1349
26
91
853 879
492
32 70 120
587 821
617
172 161 556
324
629 56?
690 845
8%
789 652 472
695
1953 Jaa
(Hawaii^
High monthly m&i&3mm xs&ans ^jere rsaoi'dsd at most of Hawaii's ecological stations diaring the past quarter*. Monthly Mas* ms&rss ranging £rom ?O°F. to 85° Fo were common from sea level to 6700 ft« The absolute maximum is-as #9° at Kupaahu (100*) and the absolute miaiuram was 32° Fo at the 5XQO9 and 6700* stations of tfoe %raia Loa Truck Trail*
The temperatures, in general, were
higher than that of the previous quarter and also higher than that of 1952 S the sam© comparable aonths* Biere T«as very little precipitation and as a result the big island has bsen suffering from a sevore dry spell* The combined total rainfall at the fotir ecological stations* Kilo, Kupaahu, Hcfca and Maraia
Loa Truck Tmil, up to September was 207*96 inches as conjpared to 262»66 iaoises for the game period ^ 1952* Kupsaliu and Mauna.Loa !Eruck Trail bad the least amount of rainfall*
%beoi'ological data for Hawaii stations are sisEmarissd on page 47« ^
Although favorabla weather conditions piwcdlea during the past host availability played an equally important part in the fly pictee on th3 island of Hawaii* Sbccept for EUo? T.!ie fly ts?end followed t*© sass pattam
aa the previous years v
Hilo, as a'result of a heavy. mango erop dating the ear
siamiaer months,, established a'record high of 217 f!5ss por trcap day in Ji23yo
Fly catches* he&seve3?s dropped shai'ply a xaoath later*
At Kupsehu^ the flies
eontiniisd to declia3 eM in August" recorded 79 flies p©r trap d^jr which is the
lowest sine© trapping opeyationc rce?:o started da 1950. The heavy reductions in fly populations during the month of August can h® explained by the lag «& occurred bstisieon tb© closrlog of th© saewgo season and the beginning- of the season-
F3^r popalations increased slightly during tho early part of Sep-fc
and increaseci to great, ^ismbsrs toward the. end of t!is months
Th9 large goam
crop^ ahich reached its psak in SsptsBibop, tras raspoasibl© for the. buildup in
the oriental fruit fly populationis"*
Tho citronella trap data and graphs are
on page sj &8 to 53» Ts?endg « Methyl Euesripl Trgps^
R-scord catches at Hilo and Kulaiihr?.slo in July resid.ted in tho third highest
C£\tchos during tho past quarter rav©'alsd: that ths population of the oriental
fruit fly was twice as. abundant as it was for ths sanss cGiaparable period ia 1952 ^
traps*
She fly trend also was downward and similar to that of th© eitronalla Trapping data ar© sho^n on page 54•
METEOROLOGICAL DATA FOR HAWAII STATIONS STATION
HILO BISECTARI
75J
KUPAABU
100 s
81
84
82
78*7 69*2
69*6
68.0 66
80.3
66 5*86
64
86 33*5
89
■
1,900'
1*92
4*000■
MAUNA LOA TRUCK TRAIL 5,1008
MAUHA LOA TRUCK TRAIL
5,900^
Ppto
86 82 06
I'lsso Mean
m.
Absolute Mino
Absolute 1%JC« Efe^o Mean 5-tki* Msan
Absolute Ma&o
62*4
Mine Mesa
32
86 78*6 55.1
S5
82
S3 74-4 52*6 44
Absolut© I'Jas©
79 72«9
75
Absolute Maso
44*2
32
35
35'
Mia« Mean Absolute Min©
£6 78*0
SI 74«.S
49a
47^2
59 '
5*03
77*6 54 • 3 47
76.2 53*1 46^
49
76*1 54 »2
4*250*
Hin» Msan
Absolute Min«
62.3
MAUHA LOA
TRUCK TRAIL
3i£as:« Meaa
61.7 59
3*79
MATMA LOA TRUCK TRAIL
7~-
8X*2
78*8
Abaolubs IvJas:o
68 1*26
69
85
Ppto
84-7 69*7
—^ KOH&
Max* Mean Kin* 2'lean Absolute Min«
8S
Si??! 70,6
•31
Absolute Maxo
3-2S
6*29
68
TEMPER4T0HE
SEPTBI4BER
AUGUST
JULI
43
'
SO 72*7
55^0
0
35
38
Max» M=san Min© M33n
Ax?solu'fc© Mlilo
69*5
4606
45,5
Absolut© MiBft
78 -
.
Absolute Ita©
70 0
Max« Mean
40*4 34 ,
Mia* Sfean Absolute Mino
73
Absolute Max* Max* Maan Mi&« Mean • •Absolut© Mine
_____
MAUNA LOA TRUCK TRAIL
6,700s
74-6 44*2 ■
3?
79 ]
36 '
•
!
i 6?«7 ^ -v 3^*2 32
POPULATION TBMDQ ON HAWAII
c •
s »
9
e
KOPAAHG
(100i)
MOHTH* 0
HILO
;
1
401 133
13
5
260
178
13
62j
39
IS
50j 269
84
25
245
19
M4
6
24
■38
11
13
2
59
40
13
29
1
20
17
11
20J 150
3
2
28
42
6
12
1
8
21
6
15J
64
4
1
17
.5
$
6
30J
24
33
2
6
752
39
338
379
599
MAY 1
368
356
505
JUNE !
309
276
198
JDSli
359
252
188
AUG«
203
218
79
april!
•952 3.953? ^^0 1951 1952 19539195O 1951 3-9?2 1 953'
$
509
406
tMii
382
497
OCT*
! 696
541
DOT*
j 325
433
CEGo
j 3.23
537
AWRc I 347
365
199 ; ««.
tacit
i
j
i
6;
j
9
865
10
1
20
31
217 j
10
2
6!
2
6
3
103J 315
18
13
5
20
4
5
4
151
1
10
1
13J 74
10
4
7
7
13
4
US
7
2
2
11
29
4
16
8
14
19
15
• 9
IS
10
90
—.
18
14
70
«
SEH'o
(4^000-5*100 s)
s
16
45
MARCH!
3
(Costa60)
9
34!
U2
451
(l^TOO9]
MAUHA LQA TRUCK TRAIL
14
793
FEB* i 452
*
KILO
121} 109
20
121
s)
(ISQii 19W»W51 1952 '195??j
53
149
K0M
23
10
66
7
43
26
| 27
74
1
s 0
4
3
a
3
3
1
2
t
-
Ml
t
7-
40
5
j l
—
5
8
11
49
r
9
33
•19
10
'
7
»
21
92-
i
i
2'ii i
10
i
^trjspt
■
n ■■
a
D00
' S
■ -. i
a
G t^P« ■: r ■.-:■ cr
0 P
a ^■■■q s si ri
c> Q W* O O O
■
>
f
!
I
p
:
■
m
tt,'
■
"
-:
I,
|j ■
-.-
■
..
i
"
:
, '""
|
§
'
v
O
go
8
•50-
P0HTUTI0N TEIi^S, fttXAKBA, HIM FHas par trap day
250
200
| 1951 X952
ppt.
30
150-
■■■
10 !
■■
■■■•■ ■■■
20
-:
10
: 0
_Jan* [ Fab*, | MSaarw j Aprpt5.oa tr 2 Popialatlcm t
1953 Papftetlon
Glass invaglaate( ". ^atioi: fciag fiata oa tables
r
lur® ■
104,107
.51-
POHJL&TICS? TRSHDS, HAWAII EXEEKIMSHT STATION HAWAII
BBAHJH, TC&HSaiOT, 1700 s
ffg per trap day
150
MTM BABj
. 1951 . 1952
12C
20
M I ■ .
■
•'."■/"./.■■
:
ESGEHDs
1951 Population t
1952 1 - ■ ■'■ion t 1953 Population trend*
Glass ii
■■..■ atsd traps arn eitroaalla If
Graphic inrcnaation based oa 65.^599 flies Stqpporting data on tables ana
Oot
:x,
1 1951 1952
30
30
20 i
■
■
'
. .,
. -
10
20
•
.
9 ■■;
■■
■■-■■ ■■•■ ■ ■
,'-
■ m ■ S
LSGEIJD:
1951 Population ■'/■ in
.
1932 Population trends..
195; . "
■
■
;- . ."
latios trend .
:
■
■.■■:.' ' ' . , ■ ■■..".'
■' "".■■;■,
!
K/ ^
^ ■.! Oct3 I feu
—3
"53"
POPULATION THEI'IDS, M&m LD& TRUCK
HAWAII NATIGK&L PAHK 4000-5100" Flies psr trap dsy
300 -*
250
1 1950 1951 1952
^ 1953
p
. .;■",
30
100
20
■
\
10
V
i
£3
■ .^ . |: III
IEGSSD:
■
:-■,'
Apr.
■ a
1^
„■ ■
:
■ -■
■' >■
July
1950 Bspulation irscds. .1953 Population tamels* 1951 Poiralation trsxais, 3.952 Popo3ation trends. Glass iiwagiiiatad tzapa £^d citro^^lla lure.
Graphic issfoymation baaewS on 287#660 files*
ibiiis data on tables
and
■
0
Methyl Eugenol Traps Plies Per Trap FJSB-i
Mia;
APR 1
600
739
220
163
22/.
179
1,389
732
3.83
265
587
2^,
161
- 13.7
72
26
256
-1S5
sm.
126
1,547
431
271
241
288
1,320
904
24S
OGTi
HOV*
DEC,
S3
232
222
263
,39
61
233
306
39
16
19
56
87
16
a
9
1
3
«-;■
3
8
109
So
60
66
56
36
43
44
174
132.
Lc ItoHfl.UMTJ (40')
334
110
30
20
HttDHIHU-a of plants« melon tlj adults fousft in a few localities \fiiero fe-vozviolo plants were preesato OJhe wore observed on cultivated non-host pLexcts growing ux^ler irrigatic on wild plants gpowlng in the vieinit;? of cultivtated plants. At Waiana® the pSjaate on whi©h utvults were prssor.'-; oa various ueeds in saeett3Lant growth
cm a from vfaitih praeviced- overhead ir-lgaticffio
Other plaisfes an wbS percent higher tbar* in 3,95fi• Mneli of this is due to fctie. Xats peak in fly catch from the I952 eropj, whieh earyieil over "into earlj 1953" EcK5nr©t^ it is also apparent fr-cia th® •clexci. t&at 'this V% not the cgaljr espBrnatiori,, sines catches during 1953 have "bsea* eoasiRtenv^ "«ighor. sk
Bate for the ii&iividuail teipc sire given 5.n t£l3le l.? as^L the ei^ trap records is talkie 2 c
7»
Eniit* iafGweotion f.^nd linci
.The infestation :ln gus-v^s gd •0-?>&u r-reacif'.-? a iK?.si:3i.ina of 23*8 larvae per
fv-yit in August,
Augvis* w^s alr.:o ths- -ricsatli of. pe^lr irifaytation In 1952; TJith
10.1 larv^a^sr f^uit*.
It should 1;q point;td ^ut a-^ain that tbe ■B^Esplia.s
tochniciiie «as cihe^gcd &.v: the "eo^irining ^f1 tliiJi J&?s ar^ it is ouits likely that the prescjiit 2j-fruit es-i^ls.7 2'ielS «?. hi£.?: ;
!
'5
»
,1700 i
s :
395 5
5
19o0
550 s
^g;,0
606
20o6
:
33
i
395 '
29
33
100 :
1025! , ll «
-
:
870 '1
:
75 -;
J
205 poo :
2° 33
£9
2 s
» Augc sAu^o 3 * • Set>£ sS©j»t« 1 « CqI' • 5 < •»
«
* Sept-
- o^t ■• 5 11
: ^lvaYaviey
a,
Ijuj* 6 ;Augo 6
0
6
Au/3.
- Sept u h
- Oct -
asioitttoftjl recoir^is 1Stos- tl; G
files of ths Hawaiian Sli-QJi? Pi-.' apnlieal&e to tize tra; y$l:tt& par.
9
1.3 !
0
2
^°5 ^j
2
s
12.2 ;
3 8
8 HoO ?
t
3
s 5^9
8
?
s s
r%»LAjWTTM TC3?
t s
4o5
7
:
0
j
0
1
: 10
s
0 ':
a
2
l°£ \ 80I
6
5
?
0
■;
2
«
•
S
JLoA'
•
' 0.8 ■;
s
3
1.0
i 5
2 s
5
1
1 1
5 5
i JtoU
1111
1
.
30
33
29 3k
26A
:
2-5"
\
1
. ';
5 k
s s
5
s
3
s
i
s
17.2
5 18.5
:
51
60 ! £65 I
:1 sI 1015 :
i ';
';
JLoO
9el
29o9
: 1
s
33
29 3k
i 1
9T!5 j 670 :
1
1 ■■■■! riPTT
^1
r.
£9 35
1 ;
2100
975 s 33o6
2X150 :
6Xni:-
s AS30 eiati
J i
D. OoQ
s.0»7
2.5 2
9
$
8
s
10
s
.
H 6 6
8 4«2
s 4.6
5 3-6 S 6.2
«*
2
2
8
7
5
5-
2
»
*C
U
..
2
?
X0
'a
3... s
0
s
0
*
S
5 67c7
1
2,3
1 O08 5 I06
i
29*5 30..0
-, 31.885
,.
3>
fl
2 3«^ s 80 0
s 0,7 3.0
a fr 13 so
reecr
a a a^
c
s
S
Manea \ra*
Lit *«'
s
7 5
:
>
- Al^K,
s ESa&aluu Valley
7
7
s
a
10
s
10
320 :
"
u u
Eaha&a Valley
7
3,55 -
:
: s s 0 0
1,6 J
235 :
33
29
•9 !
- Get .
3
7 6 7
8 2
0
Kuuonu Valley
Walmlu Valley
0o9 lc^
25 s
9 2
0
2
60 s
s
r©e.Ls©3y
S'abis 2,
Total catch In slU issfchyl eu^encl traps, Gaim, 1950-53,
Average rainfall
Pcsrdod
Jus©
28,000 28
778 1,640
October •«
24,950.
36,325
1^297
17
7,700
January
». Jaiauas'j1, I95X
il ~ May
10,950
£.6.1
.3*525
130
8,400 7,400
- Jan®
3^3
8,975
9
10
18
5,700
July « August
h 28
4,160 6,630 1m, 170
9,64?
November-
25
6,012 - Jeawarj,
1932
4,280 3,959
iterch - April pll » May y - Jua©
2,687
August *» Sep
Hoveiaber
1 in
93 IBS £02
^973 oz1 - Qctolser
6
lp,3*l
167 270 X9I
313
9.7
6 28. ry*S
S-ferch « April
April - ifey July
9,660 5 s 335
6,847 4,937
5,339 7,135 8,675
10.6-.
%f
S3 15'
12
1 16
35
5.7 3o0
2.7
9*2 9 10
33
p@c©iSber « January, I953
January'-"--Iji
4*& 7»4«!
4»2
260
171 226
:m
25
5I9
£0
4.7
13
3.3
sal 311
of data (tattLes- k*6) en fl«uit 9
S AlSgt3St
173
g
IQO
s"
236
J ]
a
i
Iko6
\
.Total flies
&?1
i
# parasitism
68.2
5
IFA, total
57
"s
I«0
o
3
23*8
■1 ;
1312
57*0
AtWJ
7oO
910
:
287
s
?6oO
200
3o3
J *
Data on Fruit Ata&enee axA Xsfsstatim.
X953,
Bates July 6
Sample Total Fruits
Total Iarrae
Total Puparia Siaptj- Fuparia
Oo incisi Qa tgggsai
Total.Paras Total Flies
$ Paras.
/
ISA
of Frui
jiBblo %
Data on im'it fibv^^nce k.vk'1 ;\n^esi;":c:lo^. August;} 1$!?3«
Sect.I ens
.
Date: :\o.
^ riO.
Ho*
Ai'lfV
1 -.
16 h
k
17 13
0
.IT
1•
I.
50
G
0 5s
k
6
3;>
33
3"?
i,
53
u
0 a
7
8
23
q
10
0
1.
2;.
3.1
\
V"
12
\
-
3
1 X
ii-
■ ?t
pA
-r
3Q ^^ "'
*. ">O
to
-'-.)
'-•• "•*• w.,:-j
o^s
3.05-3 . CO...;,)
0.
ao-ak. l 0
0.
^Incisi
0
■3-
i
o
.0
0
6o Total Passe
30