Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014 Michael Clark, MD FACC DBIM
Agenda: Underwriting NT-proBNP BNP FAQs Case 1: Deciding on BNP thresholds Case 2,3: BNP and co-morbidities Case 4,5: BNP and "offsets" And some other brain teasers….
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
2
BNP – Discovery and development for mortality risk assessment
Year
Findings
Reference
1986
Atrial natriuretic factor in humans
Hypertension (Crozier) 1986
1996
Brain natriuretic factor produced by ventricles
Circ Res (Ogawa) 1991
2002
Breathe Not Properly study
N Eng J Med (Maisel) 2002
2007
BNP in insured applicants
J Insur Med (Illango) 2007
2014
BNP for mortality risk assessment
J Insur Med (Clark) 2014
Source Heart (Bettencourt) 2005
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
3
BNP is elevated by cardiac STRESS…
Prevalence of heart failure (US population)
NHANES (Bui) 2010 Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
4
BNP identifies both systolic and diastolic cardiac dysfunction
Source: barnesjewish.org
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
5
Causes of BNP elevation (besides heart failure!) Acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina, myocardial infarction) Atrial fibrillation Valvular heart disease Left ventricular hypertrophy/hypertension Sepsis Pulmonary embolism/pulmonary hypertension COPD Renal dysfunction (NT-proBNP is excreted by the kidneys)
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
6
Case 1: Deciding on BNP thresholds
71 y.o. female smoker Normal ECG Normal TM to early Stage III Normal echo: EF 60% NT-proBNP : 228 pg/ml
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
7
Current and future clinical use of BNP
Each clinical indication may require different ranges of "normal"! Source: J Am Coll Cardiol (Maisel) 2012 Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
8
BNP as a screening tool in an asymptomatic population Source: EHJ (Linssen PREVEND cohort) 2010 mean age 49
Mortality increased at much lower BNP ranges (dotted line)
Over half of the population were at increased risk (bars) Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
9
Clinical prognostic use of NT-proBNP Source: JACC (Omland PEACE Trial) 2007
Cohort (n= 3761; aged 60-66 years) stable CAD Quartile 4 >98 pg/ml (males); > 115 pg/ml (females)
Low NT-proBNP threshold for adverse prognosis in CAD patients
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
10
Clinical reference ranges (heart failure): BNP vs. NT-proBNP BNP • 400 pg/mL - HF likely • 100-400 pg/mL - Use clinical judgment NT-proBNP • 900 pg/mL – HF likely • Age >75 years, NT-proBNP >1800 – HF likely Symptomatic patients with dyspnea! Source: Heart (Bettencourt) 2005
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
11
Clinical use of BNP/NT-proBNP: approach and challenges BNP/NT-proBNP measurement is valuable clinically for: Diagnosis: determining the cause of pulmonary insufficiency in the ER Prognosis in those at risk: multiple risk factors, known CAD, known CHF BNP/NT-proBNP clinical challenges Settling on a standard "cut point" value as "normal" Defining "heart failure" Monitoring treatment BNP measurement variability
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
12
NT-proBNP in an insurance population: distribution NT-proBNP level
% of general population
Source: EHJ (Galasko) 2005
% of insurance cohort Age 55
Age 75
> 200 pg/ml (males)
300 pg/ml (females)
50% of asymptomatic type 2 diabetics Elevated BNP levels are associated with microalbuminuria, nephropathy, and autonomic neuropathy
Source: Circ Res (Poornima) 2006 Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
25
Case 3: More about co-morbidities
72 y.o. male $750,000 Medical history: Diabetes, controlled Hypertension, controlled No other cardiac studies in the file NT-proBNP: 660 pg/ml
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
26
Agenda: Underwriting NT-proBNP BNP FAQs Case 1: Deciding on BNP thresholds Case 2,3: BNP and co-morbidities Case 4,5: BNP and "offsets" And some other brain teasers….
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
27
Case 4: BNP and "offsets"
62 y.o. male $1 million CTA done for family history of CAD Diffuse CAD Abnormal calcium score Normal stress test to Stage 4 Normal echocardiogram Carotid ultrasound with mild bilateral plaque BNP: 108 pg/ml
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
28
ECGs: evolution of the underwriting approach ECG finding
Life Re Guide 1993
Life Guide 2013
Change in rating (%)
First degree block
+50
STD
- 33%
Left axis deviation
+50
STD
- 33%
Major ST, T changes
+200
+75/+100
- 50%
Positive treadmill
+250
+100
- 45%
Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
+100
STD
- 50%
Factors impacting ECG protective value: Mortality improvement Age/amount guidelines Interpretation "flexibility" Rating "evolution" Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
29
BNP and exercise testing in CAD
355 patients (aged 63 – 75 years) with stable CAD undergoing stress echocardiography
30% (quartiles I and II) of stable CAD patients will have normal BNP levels but positive exercise tests >50% of CAD patients with high BNPs will have negative stress tests
Source: Circulation (Bibbins_Domingo) 2003 Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
30
BNP plus calcium scanning BNP and CAC provide complementary prognostic information A negative result on either test implies improved survival over situations where both tests are positive A positive result for both suggests increased risk – Source: EISNER cohort: 2400 asymptomatic adults (mean age 58 – 69 years)
AJC (Shaw) 2009 Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
31
Underwriting BNP: "judgment" factors
Assessment impact
Echo/nuclear results
J Am Coll Cardio (McKie) 2010
ECG/Exercise testing results
Circulation (Bibbins-Domingo) 2003 Am J Cardiol (Mathewkutty) 2013
Coronary imaging results
Coron Artery Dis (Sahinarslan) 2005
Calcium scan results
Am J Cardiol (Shaw) 2009
Classic cardiac risk factors
N Eng J Med (Wang) 2006 J Am Coll Cardiol (Smith) 2010
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
32
Case 4: BNP and "offsets"
62 y.o. male $1 million CTA done for family history of CAD Normal stress test to Stage 4 Normal echocardiogram Carotid ultrasound with mild bilateral plaque BNP: 108 pg/ml
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
33
Case 5: BNP and "offsets"
71 y.o. male $5 million Inferior MI 5 years ago EF 40%-59% Stress echo: Inferior akinesis but no other changes to Stage 3 exercise NT-proBNP : 2220 ng/ml
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
34
BNP with other insurance testing In "healthy normal" subgroup (=no cardiovascular risk factors or echo abnormalities) there was no increased risk of death, heart failure, CVA or MI with increased BNP In stage A/B heart failure subgroup, elevated NT pro-BNP was independently associated with these events, even after adjusting for traditional risk factors
Mayo/Olmstead county community cohort 703 "healthy normal" & 1288 stage A/B heart failure patients diagnosis based on echo and clinical assessment All patients underwent labs, ECGs, and treadmills
Analysis: Kenneth Krause, MD Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
35
Sequential testing, 1% prevalence (BNP then TMT favored)
Analysis: Kenneth Krause, MD Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
36
Decision analysis: model to assess value of NTproBNP Conclusions: Separate testing model: NT-proBNP gave the "most bang for the buck" in low or medium risk patients. (pretest probability of 1%, 5%, 10%) Treadmills become more protective/cost-effective in higher risk patients (pre-test probability >20%) Sequential model: Perform NT-proBNP first then do a treadmill if NT-proBNP abnormal Important: the value of the treadmill suffered in this analysis because of cost as compared to NT-proBNP
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
37
Agenda: Underwriting NT-proBNP BNP FAQs Case 1: Deciding on BNP thresholds Case 2,3: BNP and co-morbidities Case 4,5: BNP and "offsets" And some other brain teasers….
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
38
Case 6: Any chance?
76 y.o. female applying for $1 million WL Known "cardiomyopathy" for years "Walks 2/4 miles almost every day" ECG: LBBB NT-proBNP: 5135 pg/ml
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
39
Case 7: Any chance? 63 y.o. male $2 million WL Anterior MI 2004 2 stents placed at the time of MI: proximal LAD (90% stenosis) and midLCx (99%) LV function: "mildly impaired consistent with MI" ECG: LBBB Follow-up 2012 (after 4-year absence) Treadmill: 9 minutes (10 METs). ECG LBBB. SPECT: "No ischemia". EF 36% "mildly impaired"
NT-proBNP: 81pg/ml Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
40
BNP – a perspective BNP rating thresholds should be related to insurance distribution and scaled for age, gender, and possibly build NT-proBNP measures cardiac stress, so will be elevated in a number of cardiac conditions, including CAD, valvular heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and left ventricular hypertrophy. Unless the NT-proBNP level is extremely high (>1000 ng/ml), our impairment rating should cover the risk of a small/moderate increase with no or only a small additive rating NT-proBNP is giving us risk information that is different than ECGs, calcium scanning or exercise testing. They can be added together or used as offsets to get to the best risk assessment Very low BNP levels may be useful as rating "credits", particularly in cases of valvular heart disease or left ventricular hypertrophy of questionable severity In the final analysis, BNP underwriting requires guidelines…and good judgment! Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
41
Thank you
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
Legal notice ©2014 Swiss Re. All rights reserved. You are not permitted to create any modifications or derivatives of this presentation or to use it for commercial or other public purposes without the prior written permission of Swiss Re. Although all the information used was taken from reliable sources, Swiss Re does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy or comprehensiveness of the details given. All liability for the accuracy and completeness thereof or for any damage resulting from the use of the information contained in this presentation is expressly excluded. Under no circumstances shall Swiss Re or its Group companies be liable for any financial and/or consequential loss relating to this presentation.
Underwriting NT-proBNP NEHOUA Fall 2014
43