Treatment Outcomes for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection with Direct Acting Antivirals among Inmates in Federal Corrections
Treatment Outcomes for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection with Direct Acting Antivirals among Inmates in Federal Corrections Smith JM, Boudreau H, Kom E, T...
Treatment Outcomes for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection with Direct Acting Antivirals among Inmates in Federal Corrections Smith JM, Boudreau H, Kom E, Tremblay T Health Services, Correctional Services Canada
Disclosure I am a federal public servant employed at the Correctional Service Canada. My responsibilities include the epidemiological analysis of treatment data and providing advice on policy and programs to senior management. I have no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this topic or presentation.
Presentation Outline 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
3
Overview of CSC HCV Epidemiology in CSC CSC Formulary HCV Treatment - Results Summary
1: Overview of CSC Corrections and Conditional Release Act • Offenders sentenced to 2 years or more are sent to a federal institution to serve their sentence • Under CCRA, CSC provides all essential health care and access to non-essential mental health services that conforms to professionally accepted standards. • In fiscal year 2014-2015: – – – –
There were 4,871 new warrants of committal issued 15,043 incarcerated offenders on any given day Total “flow through” of 22,958 inmates 80% of offenders had a sentence length of 2-5 years
(Source: CSC Report on Plans and Priorities 2015-16) (Source: Corporate Reporting System, Inmate Movement and Admissions Models, April 2016)
4
1: Overview of CSC CSC Regions
(Moncton)
5
2: HCV Epidemiology in CSC HIV and HCV Testing on Admission 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% PERCENT
3: CSC Formulary HCV Treatment and Medications • Inmates with Hepatitis C infection are referred to an infectious disease specialist for consultation about treatment. Treatment for Hepatitis C is voluntary and managed by the medical specialist. • CSC National Formulary criteria are based on recommendations from the Common Drug Review (CDR) of the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) and the CSC National Pharmacy and Therapeutics (NP&T) Committee. • CSC listed the new all-oral Hepatitis C therapies on the CSC National Formulary: – Sovaldi (January 2015) – Harvoni (March 2015) – Holkira Pak (September 2015) 10
3: CSC Formulary HCV Treatment and Medications • CSC criteria originally aligned with CDR recommendations on fibrosis (F2F4) • In August 2015 CSC adopted a strategy of prioritizing treatments to fibrosis F3-F4 (those with highest severity)
• A review process is in place to consider lower levels of fibrosis on an exceptional case-by-case basis (i.e., F2 with extrahepatic complications) • This approach was not unique to CSC. The U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons adopted a similar strategy • As of April 1 2016 the prioritization has been lifted, criteria revert to F2-F4
11
4: HCV Treatment - Results Methods
Inmates initiated on HCV treatment are tracked in an electronic database. Information collected includes: – – – – –
Genotype Fibrosis Treatment History Treatment regimen / duration Treatment status (discontinued, released on treatment, completed) – HCV RNA (end of treatment, 12 / 24 weeks post treatment) – Treatment outcome (treatment failure, relapse, sustained viral response) 12
4: HCV Treatment - Results Methods • Information from the treatment registry were extracted for analysis on April 5th 2016 – Includes initiations from February 1st 2015 to April 5, 2016 – Inmates with Genotype 1 (G1) on PI (boceprevir, telaprevir, or simeprevir) were excluded – Inmates on dual therapy (peginterferon + ribavirin) were excluded
• Descriptive demographic data • Treatment status and outcome were analyzed by genotype
13
4: HCV Treatment - Results Demographics
• N=312 records were extracted for analysis – Average age: – Female: – Aboriginal:
14
49 years (min: 25 max: 74) 4.4% 28.4%
4: HCV Treatment - Results Treatment History
Of the 312 treatment initiations • Treatment History available for n=275 (88%) – 181 (66%) were treatment naïve – 94 (34%) were re-treatments • 49 null responders • 9 partial responders • 36 relapsers