TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods

SAWS TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods Philip Handley Supervisor-Resource Protection & Compliance September 3, 2013 TPDES: Soil, Erosio...
Author: Kelly Ford
56 downloads 0 Views 4MB Size
SAWS TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods Philip Handley Supervisor-Resource Protection & Compliance

September 3, 2013

TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods

September 3, 2013

Soil

Common term: “Dirt” Common Science Facts: •It’s all over your site •Three Primary Ingredients of soil -Sand -Silt -Clay •Soil Type on your site-Identifiable (NRCS-SCS County Soil Survey) •Soil (sediment) is a recognized pollutant

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 2

September 3, 2013

National Resource Conservation Service National Web Soil Survey If you need specific, local soil data, go to the website provided below and navigate to your specific desired location. If you have some basic GIS use skills you will have success with this program. It is reasonably easy and has a number of information Data sets that are valuable engineering tools

http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 3

September 3, 2013

Soil Characterization

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 4

Soil Characteristics

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 5

September 3, 2013

September 3, 2013

Soil Type Classification NOTE: It is rare to find a “pure” soil type Most Soils consists Of various percentages Of •Sand •Silt •Clay

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 6

September 3, 2013

Is Soil a Pollutant? Per USEPA, soil is the number one Pollutant on the EPA pollutant list. WHY? •Pollutants such as hydrocarbons, liquid pollutants, metals and other chemicals attach themselves to soil particles •Soil density in water (turbidity) reduces oxygen levels and creates other biological changes to habitat in living waters (fish and other biological life) •Soil transports to natural waters by storm water runoff

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 7

September 3, 2013

Erosion and Sediment Control Is there a difference Between Erosion and Sediment Control? Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 8

September 3, 2013

The Difference Erosion: is were the soil particles begin separation from the surface horizon of the mantle and transport by storm water down slope. Sediment: is the accumulation of soil particles in a settlement area where all the Soil particles collect together at the bottom of a slope Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 9

September 3, 2013

So….. Where does Erosion Begin? Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 10

September 3, 2013

The Rain Drop

Raindrop typical size: 1/16” to 1/4” dia. Fall velocity: 18 ft/sec. or about 20 mph Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 11

September 3, 2013

Raindrop Impact on Soil (example diagram) Splash Pattern

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 12

September 3, 2013

Erosion The Detachment of soil particles from the surface horizon layer of soil due to the volume and force of storm water runoff flowing across non-vegetated or non-covered natural soil mantle/surface horizon.

Sheet Erosion

Rill Erosion

Gully Erosion

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Stream Bank Erosion

Page 13

September 3, 2013

Erosion

(Soil Horizons – Eroded) Second Horizon Soil

First Horizon Soil

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 14

September 3, 2013

Where did all the Top Soil Go??? To the MS4 = Enforcement

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 15

September 3, 2013

Erosion control The prevention of soil particles detachment and reducing The volume of storm water runoff through the use of practices such as minimizing land disturbing activities, maintaining vegetative cover or substituting for lack of growing vegetation by mulching or applying blankets, Erosion control blankets/matting or some type of cover on disturbed or exposed soil mantle/horizon.

Straw Cover

Hydro Mulching

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Matting

Page 16

September 3, 2013

Erosion Control (Erosion Mats)

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 17

September 3, 2013

Erosion Control (Grassy Filter Strip)

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 18

September 3, 2013

Erosion Control (Scour and Solutions)

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 19

September 3, 2013

Velocity Control Velocity controls are used to reduce the erosion forces Of concentrated storm water flow on a construction site. Practices can include tracking or roughening slopes, rock check dams and other types of check dams and diversions.

Tracking Soil Roughening

Straw log Check Dams

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Silt Fence Diversion Page 20

September 3, 2013

Velocity Control (Silt Fence Placement)

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 21

September 3, 2013

Sediment Detached soil particles moving in the erosion process, Transported hydraulically in storm water runoff.

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 22

Sediment Control

September 3, 2013

Trapping detached soil particles that are being Transported to ensure they are deposited on site To prevent damage to other properties and to stop Pollution to receiving waters. Trapping detached soil particles is achieved by such Practices as silt fence installation, berms, filter socks And sediment control berms.

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 23

September 3, 2013

Soil Class Settlement Times Sand



Silt



Clay

1 foot



38 seconds = 1 foot

33 minutes = 1 foot

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

230 days = 1 foot Page 24

September 3, 2013

Soil –Translated to “TIME” Soil

Percent

Seconds

Minutes

Hours

Days

Sand

0

38

0.6333

0.010556

0.000439815

Silt

0

1980

33

0.5

0.022916667

Clay

0

19,872,000

331,200

5,220

230

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 25

September 3, 2013

Stoke’s Law

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 26

September 3, 2013

Sediment Control (Silt Fence Installation)

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 27

Sediment Control

September 3, 2013

(Berms) Rock Check Dam

Compost Filter Berm

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 28

Sediment Control (Rock Gabions)

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 29

September 3, 2013

Sediment Control (Basins)

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 30

September 3, 2013

Sediment Control (Filter Socks)

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 31

September 3, 2013

Sediment Control (Sediment Bag)

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 32

September 3, 2013

Sediment Control (Construction Exit)

(C

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 33

September 3, 2013

Sediment Control (Inlet Protection)

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 34

September 3, 2013

Pollutant Control (Concrete Washout Pit)

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 35

September 3, 2013

September 3, 2013

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and

Best Management Practices (BMP’s) Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 36

September 3, 2013

Why Predict Their Performance? – Historically • Start with a plan that meets the permit requirements and modify it as the plans failures become apparent.

– Future • Start with a plan that will meet “Performance Based” requirements.

– Results • Better protection of the environment • Reduced cost • Better relations between regulated and regulators

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 37

September 3, 2013

Current Sedimentation Control Design • If the control fails – get rid of it?

or – Add more of it?

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 38

September 3, 2013

Add More of It?

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 39

September 3, 2013

Add More of It?

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 40

Predict the Performance

September 3, 2013

• Understand what is happening at the control! – We have sediment laden water entering the control. – We should have ponding of the runoff. – Sedimentation will be occurring if we have ponding. – Most likely runoff will be exiting the control.

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 41

September 3, 2013

Sedimentation What is the one thing that we can look to that will give us a conclusive prediction of the effectiveness of a sedimentation control?

“Time” (Time of concentration to pool sediment laden water allowing settlement)

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 42

September 3, 2013

Effects of Time

• When runoff is detained for a “sufficient amount of time”, the sediment will settle out of the storm water runoff and will not exit the site. • If the runoff exits the control “prior to the required settling time”, ……… sediment will exit the control with the runoff. Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 43

September 3, 2013

What Do We Know So Far? • Time is the key – Provide enough time and you can remove the sediment.

• The sedimentation time required is determined by soil type. • Each control will have a unique soil type therefore each control will have a unique required sedimentation time. • Flow rate will determine the time it will take to fill the sedimentation pool based on the pool volume of the control. Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 44

The Problem With Soil

September 3, 2013

• Sand, Silt, and Clay – Most of the time soil has all three in it. – Clay being the biggest challenge for sedimentation control design. – Most of the time we cannot control what type of soil is on the site. – Sometimes the soil changes.

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 45

September 3, 2013

Remember the Soil settlement model?

Sand



Silt



Clay

1 Foot



38 seconds = 1 foot

33 minutes = 1 foot

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

230 days = 1 foot Page 46

September 3, 2013

Onsite Control Location Location of the control on the site – Determines the drainage area of the control • Soil type in the drainage area – Required sedimentation time – Amount of runoff draining to the control

• Topography of the drainage area – Amount of runoff draining to the control – Volume of water detain by the control

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 47

September 3, 2013

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 48

September 3, 2013

•Need to install triangle and rectangle (more storage)

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 49

September 3, 2013

12”

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 50

September 3, 2013

24”

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 51

September 3, 2013

Design for Maintenance

• Predict the volume of water you need to pool. • Predict the sediment volume. • Provide a storage volume equal to or greater than the total of both.

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 52

September 3, 2013

Construction Site: 43,500 S.F. (1 Acre = 43,560) Site Dimensions: 435’ long by 100’ wide = 43,500 s.f. 1 Yr./5 min. (0.54 inch) Storm event 43,500 X 0.54 = 23,522 C.F. of stormwater runoff Containment areas (Silt Fence) 100’ X 100’ X 1.5’= 15,000 C.F. 120’ X 100’ X1.5”/2= 9,000 C.F. Total Containment= 24,000 C.F.

Construction Site Containment Profile View – (n.t.s.)

435’ (site length)

Sediment Control 18” High

120’

100’

225’ Containment

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 53

September 3, 2013

Construction Site: 43,500 S.F. (1 Acre=43,560) Site Dimensions: 435’ long by 100’ wide = 43,500 s.f. 1 Yr./5 min. (0.54 inch) Storm event 43,500 X 0.54 = 23,522 C.F. of stormwater runoff Containment area (Sediment Basin w/skimmer) 100’ X 70’ X 3.5’ deep pond = 23,800 C.F. Total Containment= 23,800 C.F.

Construction Site Profile View (n.t.s.)

Construction site Plan View (n.t.s.)

Skimmer

435’

100’

435’

3.5’ 70’

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

70’

Page 54

September 3, 2013

Construction Site: 43,500 S.F. (1 Acre=43,560)

“Small Site Dilemma” Considering a current EPA Sediment Basin requirement to contain a 2 year, 24 hour storm event (Bexar Co. = 3.70” inches)…… Our 435’ X 100’ = 43,500 S.F. Construction site experiencing a 3.70” Rain Event would produce a need to contain 160,950 C.F. of stormwater runoff This would require this construction site (if it were flat in elevation) to enclose the entire site with a sediment control BMP and the entire site would be ponding stormwater runoff (435’ X 100’ X 3.70’ = 160,950 C.F.)

“Not Practical”

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 55

September 3, 2013

10 Acre Project Site (435,600 S.F.)

2 Year, 24 Hour storm event (Bexar Co. =3.70 inches) 435,600 S.F. Site X 3.70” rain event will produce 1,611,720 C.F. of stormwater runoff A Sediment Pond with a skimmer device that is 500’ X 500’ X 7’ deep can contain 1,750,000 For a large site, containing a 2 Year, 24 Hour storm event is “Practical”

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 56

September 3, 2013

Location and Topography (Sometimes, less in the “right place” is more…think strategic!)

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 57

September 3, 2013

Current Permit vs. ELG’s • Current permit

– “Erosion and sediment controls” must be designed to retain sediment on-site to the extent practicable with consideration for local topography, soil type, and rainfall.”

• Effluent Limit Guidelines (ELG’s) – No consideration for on-site conditions. – No gray area of “to the extent practicable” – Meet the required standard. ??? NTU (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 58

September 3, 2013

Summary Current NPDES • • • •

Currently SWPPP’s are designed to meet “Extent Practical” SWPPP Permitted operators rely primarily on “Sediment Control” Designers do not consider soil types & sediment loss in SWPPP design SWPPP are living documents (BMP failure prompts modification)

Future NPDES • • • •

Future EPA “ELG” will require SWPPP design to be “Performance Based” To control sediment, design will need more focus on “erosion control” Erosion control will minimize sediment in stormwater runoff Sediment control will be designed to contain and filter and eliminate sediment discharge into the MS4 • Stormwater discharge water from construction sites will require testing (turbidity or TSS?) and will have to meet specific ELG targets

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 59

Who Decides on your BMP’s?

September 3, 2013

• SWPPP’s are living documents subject to change (by you) as your project changes •WPAP’s are approved plans with specific BMP requirements & permanent BMP’s can only change by an approved modification

Common SWPPP Issues and Soil Characterization

Page 60

SAWS TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods Philip Handley Supervisor-Resource Protection & Compliance

September 3, 2013

TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods

Suggest Documents