KU ScholarWorks | The University of Kansas Pre-1923 Dissertations and Theses Collection http://kuscholarworks.ku.edu
Thought in the Poetry of Keats by Ida E. McKnight 1904 Submitted to the Department of English of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts
This work was digitized by the Scholarly Communications program staff in the KU Libraries’ Center for Digital Scholarship.
Msster Thesis
¥eKni*ht, Tor
1904
* Thought i n the p o e t r y o f Rests,••
THOUGHT I N THE
POETRY OF KEATS
BY Ida
McKnight
Thesis f o r the Degree
of
fyaster
..-•-in The U n i v e r s i t y
of Kansas.
1904.
of A r t s .
INTRODUCTION. G e n e r a l c h a r a c t e r o f K e a t s ' p o e t r y ; scope and p l a n o r t r e a t m e n t o f poems i n t h i s t h e s i s -
POEMS CONSIDERED AS REGARDS THOUGHT. I Stood Tip-Toe. Poet's e a r l y a t t i t u d e t o w a r d n a t u r e ; o r i g i n of poetry 3 S l e e p a n d ->oetry; s t a g e s i n m e n t a l d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e poet; reason and i m a g i n a t i o n ; t h e o r y of powtry; summary o f t h o u g h t 5 Endymion, I t s i n t e r e s t a s a poem; t h e n a r r a t i v e ; t h e a l l e g o r y ; i m p o r t a n c e o f t h o u g h t i n t h e poem 8 Lamia. Source; n a r r a t i v e ; antagonism o f p h i l o s o p h y and i m a g i n a t i o n ; K e a t s * g e n e r a l a t t i t u d e t o w a r d r e a son - - 1 5 Hyperion. Influence of Milton; the motive f o r c e i n a l l t h i n g s
t e a c h i n g o f peem; "beauty 18
Hyperion, A V i s i o n . Importance o f t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n ; i t s i n t e r p r e t a t i o n ; t h e p o e t ' s work and m i s s i o n - 20 The O d e s . T h e i r p l a c e i n K e a t s ' poetry; t h e i r n a t u r e ; t h e o r y o f t r u t h and beauty e x p r e s s e d i n t h e Ode on a G r e c i a n U r n
23
M i n o r Poems. I m p o r t a n c e o f thought f o u n d i n them; K e a t s ' i d e a s upon i m m o r t a l i t y and r e l i g i o n 26 CONCLUSION. nummary o f t h o u g h t i n poems r e v i e w e d ; K e a t s ' m a n n e r of c o m p o s i t i o n ; n a t u r e o f h i sp o e t r y and t e a c h i n g - 2 7 m
r r
BIBLIOGRAPHY. The P o e t i c a l W o r k s o f j o h n K e a t s Gladstone Ed. Thomas Y. C r o w e l l Pub. N.Y. B i o g r a p h i c a l s k e t c h "by N.H. D o l e . A r n o l d foathew, J o h n K e a t s ( I n e s s a y s i n C r i t i c i s m Second
Series)
A r n o l d W.T. P o e t i c a l works of K e a t s , (with and n o t e s ) London 1888.
& Co., 1895.
1889. introduction
B r i d g e s R o b e r t . Poems o f J o h n K e a t s . E d . "by G. Drury. i n t r o d u c t i o n by Robert B r i d g e s (Muses' L i b r a r y ) 1896. B e e r s H.A. H i s t o r y o f E n g l i s h R o m a n t i c i s m teenth Century. 1901. C o u r t h o p e W.J. L i b e r a l Movement pp 159-197.
Thorn
i n t h e Nine-
i n English Literature 1885.
C l a r k e C.C. a n d M r s . M.C. R e c o l l e c t i o n s o f John (In R e c o l l e c t i o n s of Writers) C o l v i n Sidney, Keats, John M o r l e y ) /
Keats
( E n g l i s h Men o f L e t t e r s , -p-d. b y 1887.
C o l v i n Sidney, L e t t e r s c f John K e a t s t o h i s F a m i l y and Friends, London. 1891. Dowden E.V/. Downer A.'C.
T r a n s c r i p t s and
Studies.
The Odes o f K e a t s . Oxford 1867
D e Q u i n c e y T. l o h n K e a t s ( I n B i o g r a p h i c a l and H i s t o r i c a l E s s a y s ) N.Y. 1878. D e V e r e A.T. V e r s a t i l i t y o f S h e l l e y and K e a t s ( I n e s s a y s c h i e f l y on P o e t r y ) 1887 *
F o r m a n H. B u x t o n .
K e a t s ' Works- E d i t o r s P r e f a c e 1883.
*
G o s s e , E W. K e a t s i n 1894. (In C r i t i c a l K i t - K a t s )
1896.
G r o s e r H.G. The P o e t s a n d P o e t r y o f t h e C e n t u r y , "by A . H . M i l e s . I n t r o d u c t i o n b y H.G. Groser. Houghton,Lord. P o e t i c a l Works, Ed. L o r d Houghton ( A l d i n e Ed.) L o w e l l T.R,
Keats
Keats
R o s s e t t i W.M.
R.F.
1892.
(In Literature
( i n e s s a y s on P o e t r y a n d L i f e of K e a t s .
Architects of English
of the
1895. poets) 1886.
1887.
S h a r p W. K e a t s and J o s e p h S e v e r n t e r s of Joseph Severn)
Sharp
by
( I n P r o s e Works v o l . 1 . ) 1891.
M i n t o W. S h e l l e y and K e a t s Georgian Era) N o e l R.
w i t h Memoir
Ed.
( I n L i f e and
Let-
1892. literature. 1900.
S w i n b u r n e A.C. Keats, In Encyclopaedia B r i t a n n i c a N i n t h Ed. V o l . XIV. W o o d b e r r y G.E. On t h e p r o m i s e i n L e t t e r s and L i f e )
of K e a t s
(In Studies
1891.
W a t t s Theodore. Poetry, Encyclopaedia Britannica n i n t h Ed. V o l . X I X .
THOUGHT IN KEATS K e a t s was
T h i s b e a u t y he
saw
though p o w e r f u l i m a g i n a t i o n most d e l i c a t e and v i v i d and
i n ancient
and he
felt The
His perception
n a t u r e and
own
sake i s the r u l i n g p r i n c i p l e of K e a t s
his
poetry
1
the
was
w i t h keen a p p r e c i a t i o n a
a r e s t r o n g l y r e f l e c t e d i n h i s work.
temperament
world of
Beauty f o r i t s art.
i s f o r t h e mort p a r t a e s t h e t i c and
than e t h i c a l or d i d a c t i c .
sensative,
p i c t u r e d f o r t h i n verse of
melodious e x c e l l e n c e .
passionate
l e g e n d , i n human
t h r o u g h the medium o f a and
o f p o e t i c d e l i g h t a b o u t him. t h e man
POETRY,
p r i m a r i l y the p o e t o f b e a u t y ; o f b e a u t y i n
a l l forms, i n a r t , i n nature, emotion.
1
Consequently,
emotional
rather
A sensuous d e l i g h t i n beauty, a f r e e
indulgence i n poetic
imagery and
f a n c y , a r i c h melody o f
verse are, then, the
q u a l i t i e s most c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f K e a t s
1
poetry* These q u a l i t i e s a r e so p r o m i n e n t outface It
t h a t t h e y sometimes
t h e d e e p e r meaning, w h i c h t h e p o e m s o f t e n c o n t a i n .
is generally
b e l i e v e d t h a t Kefcts shows i n h i s work
o f r e a l t h o u g h t o r m e n t a l power.
On t h e o t h e r hand, a
of h i s a d m i r e r s have t r i e d t o weigh h i s p o e t r y philosophy o r can
and
few
down w i t h more
a l l e g o r i c a l meaning t h a n i t r e a l l y d e s e r v e s ,
g r a c e f u l l y bear.
ly correct.
little
Neither
of these p o s i t i o n s i s whol-
W h i l e i t i s t r u e t h a t K e a t s was
not g i v e n
to
metaphysical .speculation or to subtle i n t e l l e c t u a l i n v e s t i g a t i o n s , y e t , a c l o s e study of h i s poetry w i l l
r e v e a l more
depth of thought than i s u s u a l l y a t t r i b u t e d t o the
poet.
It
i s the purpose
o f t h i s p a p e r t o examine
especially
t h o s e poems o f K e a t s , w h i c h show some r e a l t h o u g h t o r m e a n i n g , s o m e t h i n g b e y o n d t h e mere c h a r m o f t h e v e r s e and t h e o£ t h e n a r r a t i v e .
T h i s method o f t r e a t m e n t w i l l
e x c l u d e f r o m c o n s i d e r a t i o n some o f K e a t s b e a u t i f u l poems, a s w e l l a s much t h a t pass
over those c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s
1
interest
necessarily
i m p o r t a n t and
i s poor. I t w i l l
of K e a t s
1
most also
poetry f o r which
i s b e s t known a n d
f o r w h i c h he
covered here w i l l
s i m p l y be d e f i n e d , n o t d u s c u s s e d as t o i t s
originality.
i s most l o v e d .
A chronological order w i l l
t r e a t m e n t o f t h e poems.
The
he
thought d i s
be f o l l o w e d
i n the
6
Keatft
1
f i r s t volume of p o e t r y c o n t a i n s two i m p o r t a n t works,
w h i c h a r e o f i n t e r e s t t o us as showing t h e e a r l y bent o f t h e p o e t s mind* f
These two a r e t h e poem
upon a L i t t l e H i l l , 1 1
The f i r s t
b e g i n n i n g : " I Stood
Tip-Toe
and t h e one e n t i t l e d "Sleep and P o e t r y " .
shows t h e p o e t s e a r l y a t t i t u d e toward f
To h i m n a t u r e makes a d i r e c t a p p e a l .
nature.
He l o v e s h e r f o r h e r
own sake and enjoys h e r a p a r t f r o m any r e l a t i o n t o man. Keats Sonnett p 382
Gladstone
Ed.
p e r c e p t i o n o f n a t u r e here i s t h a t o f t h e c h i l d -
1
ff
when f a n c y c l e a r t a k e s i n a l l b e a u t y w i t h an easy span".
There i s no p l a c e f o r s e r i o u s thought and
i n t h i s passionate
i n t e n s e enjoyment e f n a t u r a l beauty;
f o r a flood of
images crowd upon t h e v i s i o n and i m m e d i a t e l y - . I Stood Tip-toe l i n e 133
"The
s o u l i s l o s t i n pleasant
N a t u r e i s n o t a prophet
smotherings."
t o f o r t h t e l l the t r u t h s of the
u n i v e r s e And t o r e v e a l t o t h e u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f man t h e g r e a t h e a r t o f t h e i n f i n i t e p u l s a t i n g through a l l h e r v i s i b l e forms. no
No m e t a p h y s i c a l t h e o r i e s o f l i f e and i m m o r t a l i t y ,
i d e a l ' sy£tems|of s o c i a l o r d e r , no s e c r e t s o f human d e s t i n y
a r e seen i n t h e m y s t e r i o u s w o r k i n g s I
Stood Tip-toe 11.70-71
of nature.
"The h u r r y i n g f r e s h n e s s e s aye p r e a c h Ajnatural sermon o e r t h e i r p e b b l y beds," f
b u t t h i s sermon s u g g e s t s no m o r a l o r s p i r i t u a l t e a c h i n g , i n s t e a d o f c a l l i n g t o h i s mind t h e s u f f e r i n g s and r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s o f l i f e , n a t u r e i n v i t e s man t o d e l i g h t i n h e r b e a u t i e s , ijihe t r e e s , t h e g r a s s , t h e f l o w e r s , "the b l u e c r a g g i n e o s " o f t h e s k y speak b u t a s i m p l e message o f j o y . I t was t h i s sensuous d e l i g h t t h a t man h a s e v e r #* i% e
i n
mature, T Stood Tip-toe 1.142.
which f i r s t
gave r i s e t o p o e t i c c r e a t i o n .
The i m a g i n -
a t i o n was b o r n 0n t h e smooth wind t o realms o f wonderment" f,
where t h e w h i s p e r o f t h e b r e e s e t o l d a t a l e o f f a n c y and myth. The
l e g e n d s o f P s y c h e , N a r c i s s u s and Endymion were f i r s t
sug-
g e s t e d t o t h e mind o f some b a r d under t h e magife s p e l l o f 6
nature.
Moreover
f
-the v e r s e
t h e v e r y music^had
i t s origin
i n t h e rhythm
and melody found i n a l l c r e a t e d t h i n g s , and (l/f- | £S
" I n t h e c a l m grandeur o f a sober l i n e , We see t h e waving o f t h e mountain p i n e . " This e a r l y o b j e c t i v e treatment of nature i s w h o l l y s e n s u o u s , and shows no m e n t a l c o l o r i n g ; b u t i t d e s e r v e s n o t i c e h e r e a s a c o n t r a s t t o t h e s l i g h t element o f thought a s s o c i a t e d w i t h n a t u r e i n t h e poem n e x t t o be c o n s i d e r e d .
S l e e p and P o e t r y i s f u l l
o f meaning.
Sleep
represents
t h e e a r l y s t a t e of t h e mind "before awakened t o a f u l l t i o n of the t r u t h and d e s t i n y of l i f e ,
m
realiza-
t h i s s t a t e the mind
p e r c e i v e s t h e b e a u t i e s o f the e x t e r n a l w o r l d w i t h a keen p a s s i o n a t e d e l i g h t ; b u t a l l p l e a s u r e i s merely
sensuous. Then
p o e t r y , 02* t h e p o e t i c i n f l u e n c e o v e r the mind opens- up realms
of v i s i o n .
The
new
imagination begins to work and passes ?
beyond the v i s i b l e forms o f beauty,
i n t o a w o r l d of
delightful
ideality.
T?ut t h i s new
f r o m man.
f h e mind i n t u r n l e a v e s t h i s second s t a t e f o r a
w o r l d of p o e t i c f a n c y i s s t i l l
h i g h e r one, where human r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s and concerned. S l e e p and oetry,ll. 122-124
Of t h i s change the poet
apart
interests are
says:
"And can I e v e r b i d t h e s e j o y s f a r e w e l l ? Y e s , I must p a s s them f o r a n o b l e r l i f e , Where I may f i n d t h e a g o n i e s , the s t r i f e Of human h e a r t s , * _ N a t u r e now
11 136150
and
l i v e s anew i n s y m p a t h e t i c
e m o t i o n s o f t h e human h e a r t . i n t e l l e c t u a l discernment t h e u n i v e r s e and
265-266
searches
response
t o the
Moreover i t ' i s not r e a s o n
h e r e t h a t p e n e t r a t e s the s e c r e t s o f out
t#ruth,but,
" t h imagination I n t o most l o v e l y l a b y r i n t h s w i l l be gone" f
and
t h e r e f i n d out t h e m y s t e r i e s of n a t u r e and of human l i f e ,
for >3-165
167-170
or
" I s t h e r e so s m a l l a range In t h e p r e s e n t s t r e n g t h o f manhood t h a t the h i g h I m a g i n a t i o n cannot f l y ? - - ~ ~ ~ Has she not shown us a l l From t h e c l e a r space o f e t h e r , t o the s m a l l B r e a t h o f new bufls u n f o l d i n g ? Of h i m s e l f t h e poet say: 1 1
6
"What though I am n o t w e a l t h y i n t h e dower Of s p a n n i n g wisdom; though I do n o t know The s h i f t i n g s o f t h e m i g h t y w i n d s t h a t "blow H i t h e r and t h i t h e r a l l t h e c h a n g i n g t h o u g h t s Of man: t h o u g h no g r e a t m i n i s t r i n g r e a s o n so Out t h e d a r k m y s t e r i e s o f human s o u l s To c l e a r c o n c e i v i n g : y e t t h e r e e v e r r o l l s A v a s t i d e a b e f o r e me, and I g l e a n ^ h e r e f r o m my l i b e r t y . "
11.284-292
f
K e a t s a l s o s e t s f o r t h i n t h i s poem i t s t r u e a i m and f u n c t i o n .
h i s theory of poetry,
He e x p r e s s e s h i s e n t h u s i a s t i c
l o v e f o r h i s a r t i n t h e words 11.96-97
"0 f o r t e n y e a r s t h a t I may overwhelm myself i n p o e ^ y . " H i s famous l i n e d e s c r i b i n g poesy: "Tis
might h a l f s l u m b r i n g on h i s own r i g h t arm" f
i s a f i n e example o f p o e t r y , b u t an e x c e e d i n g l y vague d e f i n i tion.
Keats b e l i e v e d that poetry should f i r s t
p l e a s u r e and comfort 11.267268
245-24.7
of a l l b r i n g
t o man. T h e r e f o r e
"They s h a l l be a c c o u n t e d
poet kings
Who s i m p l y s a y t h e most h e a r t - e a s i n g t h i n g s . * A g a i n he speaks o f " t h e g r e a t end Of p o e s y , t h a t i t s h o u l d be a f r i e n d To s o o t h t h e c a r e s , and l i f t t h e t h o u g h t s
o f man".
There i s t h e n i n S l e e p and p o e t r y a d e c i d e d i n p o i n t o f thought
o v e r t h e poem f i r s t
advanfcarge
considered.
i s t o be seen i n n a t u r e t h a n mere o b j e c t i v e b e a u t y ,
More poetry,
i n s t e a d o f b e i n g b u t t h e e x p r e s s i o n i n song o r l e g e n d o f t h e e c s t a t i c d e l i g h t caused b y n a t u r e , i s a d i v i n e r a r t , w h i c h has been touched
and h a l l o w e d b y t h e s p i r i t o f human sympathy.
7
B u t b y f a r t h e most i m p o r t a n t found
a d d i t i o n o f thought
i n t h e poem i s t h e p r i n c i p l e t h a t
i ti sthe o f -
f i c e o f t h e i m a g i n a t i o n and not t h a t o f t h e r e a s o n t o f i n d o t r u t h ^ t o " p l u c k out t h e h e a r t o f t h e mystery" and
i n human
life.
i n nature
8
Endymion. Endymion i s a n e x c e e d i n g l y
i n t e r e s t i n g poem a s a
I t n o t o n l y c l a i m s .our a t t e n t i o n f o r i t s b e a r i n g upon
study. Keats
1
p e r s o n a l h i s t o r y , b u t a l s o f o r i t s r e l a t i o n t o t h e development of h i s genius.
I t w i l l be c o n s i d e r e d
here only i n reference
t o t h e r e a l thought m a t e r i a l t h a t i t c o n t a i n s . c u s s i n g t h e poem i t w i l l be w e l l
Before
dis-
t o review the n a r r a t i v e .
E n d y m i o n , t h e s h e p h e r d p r i n c e o f Latmus i s i n l o v e w i t h C y n t h i a , whom he h a s
s e e n i n a v i s i o n , t h o u g h he does n o t
know y e t t h a t she i s t h e moon-goddess,
d i r e c t e d b y a message
t h a t he r e a d s on t h e w i n g s o f a b u t t e r f l y , he d e s c e n d s the
mysteries
of the lower world.
t i m e , s e e i n g r a r e and w o n d e r f u l unusual adventures.
into
Here he wanders f o r some-
s i g h t s and m e e t i n g w i t h many
• He e n c o u n t e r s A d o n i s ,
Venus, C y b e l l , and
other m y t h i c a l personages. Cynthia v i s i t s him i n a b e a u t i f u l bower, and l e a v e s h i m a s l e e p , and
Arethusa,
own, and he
-pjndymion t h e n meets A}.pheus
two l o v e r s who a r e s u f f e r i n g a p a s s i o n l i k e h i s p r a y s f o r them.
He u n e x p e c t e d l y
u n d e r t h e s e a . Here h e meets g l a n c u s
finds himself
and S c y l l a ,
restores
t o l i f e t h e dead l o v e r s who have been drowned a t s e a . He r e t u r n s t o e a r t h and i m m e d i a t e l y
falls
i nlove with a b e a u t i f u l
I n d i a n m a i d e n , whom he f i n d s b e w a i l i n g h e r s o r r o w and l o n l i ness. horses,
T o g e t h e r t h e y a r e b o r n t h r o u g h t h e u p p e r a i r on f l y i n g c y n t h i a a p p e a r s t o Endymion and he a t once f o r g e t s
t h e I n d i a n maiden,who v a n i s h e s .
I n t h e m i d s t o f a hymn t o
D i a n a , Eddymion i s b o r n t o e a r t h a g a i n .
Here h e f i n d s t h e
X n d i a n m a i d e n , and a second t i m e t r a n s f e r s h i s a f f e c t i o n s f r o m t h e goddess t o h e r .
He f i n a l l y d e c i d e s
to forget a l l love
9
and t o l i v e t h e l i f e
of a r e l i g i o u s r e c l u s e .
But now
the
g o d d e s s h e r s e l f a p p e a r s , and he l e a r n s t h a t t h e moon, C y h t h i a and t h e I n d i a n a r e t h e same and Endymion v a n i s h e s w i t h t h e goddess to e n j o y immortal b l i s s . The poem, i f read f o r t h e s t o r y i t s e l f , i s
disappointing.
T h e r e a r e t o o many l o n g e p i s o d e s and d i g r e s s i o n s ,
rjihe t h r e a d
of the n a r r a t i v e i s o f t e n l o s t i n a c o n f u s i o n of f a n c i f u l and
b e w i l d e r i n g images.
E v e n the f r e q u e n t o c c u r r e n c e
o f piassages o f a l m o s t u n s u r p a s s a d p o e t i c b e a u t y does n o t save t h e poem a t t i m e s f r o m b e i n g t e d i o u s . 3pecially
Some o f K e a t s
)ht . B r i d g e s id tors.F.to. e l a b o r a t e and Bwen.
1
a d m i r e r s have read i n t o t h i s poem an
i n v o l v e d a l l e g o r y , w h i c h weighs down w i t h
i n g every d e t a i l of the s t o r y ,
mean-
some o f t h e p r i n c i p a l p o i n t s
of i n t e r p r e t a t i o n are these: Cynthia stands f o r a b s t r a c t beauty, or poetic i d e a l i t y . wanderings
Endymion i s man,
o r t h e human s o u l . H i s
i n s e a r h l f o f h i s l o v e a r e b u t t h e l o n g i n g s and t h e
s t r u g g l e s o f t h e human s o u l a f t e r i d e a l b e a u t y .
Since t h i s
l o n g i n g t a k e s t h e f o r m o f l o v e and s i n c e t h e I n d i a n woman, (human l o v e ) and C y n t h i a ( d i v i n e l o v e ) , p r o v e t o be a t
last
t h e same, t h e n a l l l o v e , human as w e l l as d i v i n e i s t h e same, namely, i d e a l beauty.
I t i s w h i l e communing w i t h
external
n a t u r e t h a t Endymion reads on t h e wings o f a b u t t e r f l y
the
message summoning, h i m t o an unknown w o r l d o f m y s t e r y .
Thus
d o e s n a t u r e e v e r a d m i t h e r communicants i n t o t h e r e a l m s o f h e r m y s t e r i e s and t h e r e r e v e a l s t o them h e r s e c r e t s .
J n the
d a r k and s o l i t a r y u n d e r w o r l d Endymion f i n d s a s h r i n e t o D i a n a . A l s o a moonbeam r e a c h e s h i m i n t h e c o l d ocean d e p t h s . beauty
g
0
i d e a l b e a u t y , permeate a l l t h i n g s and e v e r s h i n e s
doss
10
u p o n h i m who
e a r n e s t l y s e e k s i d e a l i t y . When Endymion f o r g e t s h i s
own
sorrows
to sympathize
w i t h t h e v/oes o f A l p h e u s and
and
when he o f f e r s a i d t o G l a u c u s and
p r o s p e c t s b e g i n t o l o o k up. hastened
on h i s way
toward
f
happiness.
t h e dead l o v e r s , t h e n h i s
S u c c e s s becomes a s s u r e d and he the attainment
s y m p a t h y w i t h t h e c a r e s and a l l e v i a t e o n e s own
sorrows
woes, and
of h i s l o v e . I t
religious
tails
The
in interpre-
o u t l i n e . I have
upon t h e c h i e f and more r e a s o n a b l e read deeper than t h i s
p e ^ a s u s w i t h l o g s o f p r o s e " , and tions,
and
service.
t i n g t h e a l l e g o r y ; o t h e r s not so much.
a p p l i c a t i o n s . .To
to
f i n a l l y brings satisfaction
S o m e . c r i t i c s go more i n t o d e t a i l t h a n t h i s
g i v e n touches
is is,then,
of o t h e r s which h e l p s
H e r e i s v o i c e d t h e common e t h i c a l and
i d e a l of s o c i a l
Arethusa
is certainly
even some o f t h e s e
I t h i n k , are wholly f a n c i f u l . o f t h e s t o r y seem t o h^ve
allegorical
True, the
"hobbling interpreta-
i n c i d e n t s and
de-
a c e r t a i n f i t n e s s f o r the
m e a n i n g s a t t a c h e d t o them, b u t t h a t i s n o t s a y i n g t h a t t h e p o e t s e l e c t e d them w i t h t h e d e l i b e r a t e i n t e n t i o n t i h a t set
they-should
f o r t h such meanings, f o r i t i s p o s s i b l e , by a l i t t l e i n -
g e n u i t y , to read, into almost
any poem some s p i r i t u a l o r p o l i t i c a l
meaning. i n t h e f i r s t p l a c e , I have n o t b e e n a b l e t o f i n d statement
o r i m p l i c a t i o n made by K e a t s h i m s e l f o r b y any
intimate contemporizes On
t h a t t h i s poem was
any of h i s
intended f o r an
allegory.
the other, hand, Keats d i d say of i t i n a l e t t e r t o j j r . B a i l e y ,
w i l l be. a .test o f my powr o f . i m a g i n a t i o n and
c h i e f l y of my-in-
v e n t i o n - w h i c h . i s , a r a r e t h i n g i n d e e d - b y w h i c h I must make 4,000 l i n e s o f one b a r e
circumstance
and
fill
them w i t h p o e t r y .
n
"11
11
T h i s does not sound as i f e v e r y l i t t l e
d e t a i l has a p a r -
t i c u l a r meaning, o r any n e c e s s a r y p l a c e i n t h e development of
a l o n g and c o m p l i c a t e d a l l e g o r y . Moreover
i n t h e poem " I s t o o d T i p - t o e up°n a L i t t l e
Hill
1 1
the
l e g e n d o f Endymion i s spoken o f a s h a v i n g i t s o r i g i n i n
the
mind o f some p o e t u n d e r t h e e c s t a t i c s p e l l o f t h e b e a u t i e s
of
nature.
of
t h e l o v e s o f D i a n a and SJndymion,
ing
I t i s o n l y a b e a u t i f u l myth, o n l y t h e sweet
of the t a l e
story
The o r i g i n and o n l y mean-
i s t o l d as f o l l o w s :
He was a p o e t , s u r e a l o v e r t o o , Who s t o o d on L a t m u s t o p , what t i m e t h e r e b l e w S o f t b r e e z e s f r o m t h e m y r t l e v a l e below; And b r o u g h t i n f a i n t n e s s solemn, sweet, and s l o w A hymn f r o m D i a n s t e m p l e ; w h i l e u p s w e l l i n g , The i n c e n s e went t o h e r own s t a r r y d w e l l i n g . B u t t h o u g h h e r f a e was c l e a r a s i n f a n t s e y e s , Though she s t o o d s m i l i n g o e r t h e s a c r i f i c e , The Poet wept a t h e r so p i t e o u s f a t e , Wept t h a t s u c h b e a u t y s h o u l d be d e s o l a t e : So i n f i n e w r a t h some g o l d e n sounds he won, And gave meek C y n t h i a h e r Endymion. f,
1
11.193-204
f
f
c
f
T h i s passage
i s o f s p e c i a l i n t e r e s t , f o r , i t must be remembered ;
)
fcfctft* i t was w r i t t e n n o t l o n g b e f o r e Endymion and i t i s bel i e v e d b y many t h a t t h e .whole poem f r o m w h i c h t h e s e l i n e s a r e t a k e n was f i r s t w r i t t e n f o r a p r o l o g u e t o t h e l o n g e r E n d y m i o m Now i f K e a t s had i n t e n d e d t o make t h e s t o r y o f Endymion i n each d e t f f i j the of
exposition of
a c a r e f u l l y planned
system
t h o u g h t , t h e r e w o u l d s u r e l y be some m o t i o n o f h i s d e s i g n i n
t h i s e a r l y i n t r o d u c t i o n o r p r o l o g u e t o t h e l a t e r poem, the
tale
i s spoken o f h e r e as m e r e l y t h e f a n c y o f some p o e t and
l o v e r , and t o K e a t s i t )
its
put
seems t h e s t o r y was a t t r a c t i v e f o r )
own s i m p l e theme and n o t f o r t h e s u b t l e meanings t h a t
12
some have t r i e d t o make i t h e a r . The
l a c k o f e x t e r n a l e v i d e n c e cannot a r g u e a g a i n s t an
a l l e g o r i c a l teaching
i n some o f K e a t s
t h e meaning i s w e l l d e f i n e d For
instance
i n such
1
l a t e r works where
or expressly
pointed out.
poems a s H y p e r i o n and L a m i a t h e l e s s o n
i s n o t l e f t t o t h e i n f e r e n c e o f t h e r e a d e r b u t i s c l e a r l y drawn by t h e p o e t h i m s e l f .
x
w i t h i n t h e poem i t s e l f , h i d d e n meaning,
n
Endymion however, t h e r e
i s no e v i d e n c e
n o t even a h i n t , t h a t t h e s t o r y h a s a
jn one p l a c e ^ t h e
p o e t says o f i t
tis a ditty Not o f t h e s e d a y s , but l o n g ago t w a s t o l d By a c a v e r n w i n d unto, a f o r e s t o l d ; And t h e n t h e f o r e s t t o l d i t i n a dream To a s l e e p i n g l a k e , whose c o o l and l e v e l gleam A p o e t caught a s he was j o u r n e y i n g To P h o e b u s s h r i n e ; and i n i t he d i d f l i n g H i s weary l i m b s , b a t h i n g an h o u r s s p a c e , And a f t e r , s t r a i g h t i n t h a t i n s p i r e d p l a c e He sang t h e s t o r y up i n t o t h e a i r g i v i n g i t u n i v e r s a l freedom." , f
f
1
f
Mr.
Bridges
s u g g e s t s t h a t t h e l a s t two l i n e s may i m p l y
that
K e a t s w i s h e d t h e l e g e n d t o be i n t e r p r e t e d a l l e g o r i c a l l y , b u t I c a n see n o t h i n g
i n t h i s whole p a s s a g e t h a t
indicates a
d e e p e r s i g n i f i c a n c e i n t h e legend t h a n t h a t s u g g e s t e d i n t h e l i n e s quoted f r o m t h e p r o l o g u e . *
It
I s b a r e l y p o s s i b l e , however, t h a t K e a t s may have
w i s h e d t h e l e g e n d t o i l l u s t r a t e some meaning i n a v e r y
gener-
a l way even though he had no i n t e n t i o n o f making t h e poem in a l l i t s parts a consistent allegory.
We know v e r y
well
t h a t a l l e g o r i z i n g was a p o e t i c a l manner witth . K e a t s , b u t t h i s h a b ^ i t was n e v e r c a r r i e d t o t h e a b s u r d l y extent
analytical
t h a t some would have i t c a r r i e d t o i n E n d y m i o n ,
13
The main theme may be i n i t s b r o a d e r o u t l i n e m e t a p h o r i c a l , t h a t i s i t may stand f o r t h e l o n g i n g o f t h e human s o u l a f t e r beauty.
^
l s
° t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n o f t h e I n d i a n woman-
e s s a r y t o t h e development significance.
so unnec-
o f t h e s t o r y , may have some s p e c i a l
#he I n d i a n woman, I t h i n k , s t a n d s f o r b e a u t y ,
j u s t as C y n t h i a does. H e r i d e n t i t y w i t h C y n t h i a shows t h a t b e a u t y i s b e a u t y - a l w a y s one
and t h e same
i n e s s e n c e under
whatever f o r m i t may a p p e a r .
I t i s o n l y o u r human i g n o r a n c e
t h a t d i s c r i m i n a t e s between what we suppose t o be d i f f e r e n t k i n d s o f b e a u t y , c o n f u s i n g t h e f o r m w i t h t h e r e a l i t y back of the form.
I t must be remembered t h a t t h e two women a r e
one i n r e a l i t y , never i n fprm o r appearance.
This interpret
t a t i o n may seem f a n c i f u l b u t i t i s c l e a r l y b o r n o u t , I t h i n k , in Hyperion,
yhe f a c t t h a t t h e same thought i s e x p r e s s e d
w i t h much f o r c e and c l e a r n e s s i n t h i s l a t e r poem i s t h e b e s t e v i d e n c e I have f o r b e l i e v i n g t h a t t h e i n c i d e n t h e r e may have been i n t e n d e d t o r e f l e c t t h e meaning f have a t t r i b u t e d t o I t . The t h o u g h t t h e n i n Endymion may be t h i s . There i s i n t h e human s o u l an i n n a t e l o n g i n g f o r t h e a t t a i n m e n t o f i d e a l beauty.
3Jhis b e a u t y , w h i c h permeates
t h e whole
universe,
i s always one i n s u b s t a n c e , though i t may appear under many d i f f e r e n t forms.
I t i s not s a f e , I t h i n k , t o go f u r t h e r ,
and even t h e s e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n s a r e b u t p o s s i b l e . be w h o l l y m i s p l a c e d , Keats
1
p u t i f t h e y s h o u l d be
They may
rejected altogether
p o e t r y would n o t s u f f e r a n y s e r i o u s l o s s i n t h o u g h t .
The f i r s t
I deem o f no remarkable i m p n r t a n c e , f 6 r t h e t h o u g h t
i s a t r u i s m , and t h e second, a s I s a i d , i s p l a i n l y b r o u g h t out i n H y p e r i o n .
14
I t might
seem,perhaps,
t h a t t o o much s p a c e h e r e
v o t e d t o E n d y m i o n when t h e poem i s o f so l i t t l e a s r e g a r d s mere t h o u g h t ,
i s de-
impertance
^ u t E n d y m i o n , more t h a n a n y o t h e r
o f t h e poems o f K e a t s h a s "been o v e r b u r d e n e d v / i t h f a r - f e t c h e d and
t o o - ingenious i n t e r p r e t a t i o n s which c e r t a i n l y give the
poem much more s u b t i l i t y o f t h o u g h t t h a n i t d e s e r v e s . Endymion i s K e a t s
1
first
strong p l e a f o r the b e a u t i -
f u l and b e g i n s w i t h t h e i m m o r t a l l i n e ft
A t h i n g o f b e a u t y i s a j oy f o r e v e r . "
15
Lam i a • Lamia i s one of the most v i v i d as w e l l as the most f i n i s h e d of K e a t s
n a r r a t i v e poems.
1
The
s t o r y i s taken from
Burton s
Anatomy o f 1/ieloncholy, where i t i s quoted from t h e l i f e o f , f
Rossetti s fe of j c e a t s l k p o l l o n i u s " p.108 * f
a work by P h i l o s t r a t u s .
Lamia a serpent-woman g a i n s
complete^mastery over L y c i u s , a young s t u d e n t of p h i l o s o p h y . She b u i l d s f o r him a m a g n i f i c i e n t pal&ce where t h e y d w e l l t o g e t h e r and c e l e b r a t e t h e i r m a r r i a g e f e a s t ,
TO t h i s f e a s t A p o l -
l o n i u s , the o l d p h i l o s o p h e r and t e a c h e r o f Lycftus, comes as an u n b i d d e n g u e s t .
He p u b l i c l y denounces Lamia and r e v e a l s h e r
t r u e c h a r a c t e r , tynder h i s f i e r c e and s t e a d y gaze, the c h a n t r e s s , w i t h a scream, v a n i s h e s .
en-
The poem ends w i t h the
death of L y c i u s . The t e a c h i n g o f the poem i s o b v i o u s .
The
antagonism
of Lamia and A p o l l o n i u s i s the antagonism o f p l e a s u r e p h i l o s o p h y , o r o f the i m a g i n a t i o n and
reason.
and
Of t h i s meaning
I t h i n k t h e r e can be no doubt f o r the poeto draws the l e s s o n h i m s e l f i n the w e l l known l i n e s : Do not a l l charms f l y At the mere t o u c h o f c o l d philosophy!. There was an a w f u l rainbow once i n heaven: We know h e r woof, h e r t e x t u r e ; she i s g i v e n In the d u l l c a t a l o g u e of common t h i n g s . P h i l o s o p h y w i l l c l i p an a n g e l s wings Conquer a l l m y s t e r i e s by r u l e and l i n 8 i Empty the haunted a i r , a n d gnomed mindUnweave a rainbow, as i t e r e w h i l e made The t e n d e r - p e r s o n d Lamia melt i n t o a shade." f,
f
?
f
The p o e t s sympathy i s p l a i n l y w i t h t h e serpent-woman and his
resentment a t the i n t e r f e n e n c e of A p o l l o n i u s w i t h Lamia's
h a p p i n e s s i s b o l d l y a s s e r t e d . He makes p h i l o s o p h y c o l d and u n i n v i t i n g , a p o l l o n i u s laughs as he e n t e r s the p a l a c e as i f p h i l o s o p h y t o o k d e l i g h t i n t h e wanton d e s t r u c t i o n o f p l e a s u r e .
1
16
Lamia though s t a n d s f o r more t h a n mere p h y s i c a l enjoyment. ;
She
i s sense p e r c e p t i o n .
explanation of K e a t s
1
$he
i s imagination,
sympathy w i t h h e r .
T&
i s
must "be t h e
But even t h e n t h e
s t a n d t h e poet t a k e s would "be more c o n s i s t e n t i f he had made t h e opponent o f p h i l o s o p h y good as w e l l as " b e a u t i f u l .
We
can
h a r d l y b r i n g o u r s e l v e s - even w i t h K e a t s - t o champion a h e r o i n e who Lamia I I 1.31
dwells in "That p u r p l e l i n e d p a l a c e o f sweet s i n
1 1
n o r can we blame p h i l o s o p h y f o r d e s t r o y i n g a h a p p i n e s s t h a t of Lamia I I 11.9-10
i t s e l f would have ended i n m i s e r y "but too s h o r t was t h e i r b l i s s To b r e e d d i s t r u s t and h a t e , and make t h e s o f t
But h e r e , as i n Endymion K e a t s s u r e l y d i d not i n t e n d t o
voice hiss" .
;
make the a l l e g o r y o r i n n e r meaning a p p l y a t e v e r y p o i n t . K e a t s a t t i t u d e toward reason o r pure i n t e l l e c t i s f r e q u e n t l y expressed i n h i s o t h e r work*.' I n one p l a c e he s a y s : E p i s t l e to "Oh, n e v e r w i l l the p r i z e , Reynolds H i g h reason, and the l o v e of good and i l l 74-75-76 Be my award!" and a g a i n he speaks o f h i s p o e t i c a l
inspiration:
"My muse had wings, And e v e r ready was t o t a k e h e r c o u r s e W h i t h e r I bent h e r f o r c e , t m i n t e l l e c t u a l , yet d i v i n e t o me;D i v i n e I say! what s e a - b i r d o e r the sea I s a p h i l o s o p h e r the v/hile he goes W i n g i n g a l o n g where the g r e a t water t h r o e s ? "
Lines to Painny 11. 11-17
f
The p o e t ' s need o f knowledge i s set f o r t h i n the song of the t h r u s h What the £hrush S a i d 11.9-12 The
"0 f r e t not a f t e r knowledge- I have none, And y e t my song comes n a t i v e w i t h the warmth 0 f r e t not a f t e r knowledge- I have none, And y e t t h e evening l i s t e n s . "
same i d e a 4* found t h a t f o r }ji'rn
i n Sleep and p o e t r y where K e a t s
>
says
"no g r e a t m i n i s t r i n g r e a s o n s o r t s Out t h e d a r k m y s t e r i e s o f human s o u l s *po c l e a r c o n c e i v i n g . 1
S l e e p and ?oetry 11.268-89
1 1
The poem, t h e n ,
i n a g e n e r a l way seems t o s t a n d f o r
t h e a n t a g o n i s m o f i m a g i n a t i o n and r e a s o n o r s c i e n c e , a n d a s s e r t s t h e s u p e r i o r i t y o f i m a g i n a t i o n as a c o n t r o l i n g p r i n c i p l e i n human
thought.
18
Hyperion. H y p e r i o n i s a fragment •
f\he poem d e a l s w i t h the o v e r -
t h r o w o f t h e o l d T i t a n r a c e of d i v i n i t i e s by the young Olymp i a n gods.
The
i n f l u e n c e o f M i l t o n i s seen i n H y p e r i o n
b o t h i n t h e g e n e r a l p l a n o f t h e p i e c e and i n the s t y l e and diction. passage
The theme i t s e l f
may have been suggested by a
i n Paradise Lost. " T i t a n , Heaven's f i r s t - b o r n , W i t h h i s enormous brood,and b i r t h r i g h t s e i z e d By younger S a t u r n : he f r o m m i g h t i e r J o v e , H i s own and Rhea's son, l i k e measure f o u n d ; So Jove u s u r p i n g r e i g n e d . "
Book I . 11.510-514
The one m o t i f of t h e poem i s s e t f o r t h i n t h e speech of
Oceanus t o t h e 'assembled h o s t of f a l l e n gods. Oceanus
r e a s o n s t h a t t h e young A p o l l o and h i s f o l l o w e r s must i n t u r n g a i n supremacy j u s t a s t h e T i t a n gods s u r p a s s e d i n power and b e a u t y the Hyperion I I . 212-18
o l d e r Chaos and
"So on o u r h e e l s a f r e s h p e r f e c t i o n t r e a d s , A power more s t r o n g i n b e a u t y , b o r n o f us And f a t e d t o e x c e l us, as we p a s s In g l o r y t h a t o l d D a r k n e s s : n o r are we Thereby more conquer'd t h a n by us the r u l e Of s h a p e l e s s fjhaos."
These gods o f t h e new Hyperion I I 11.226-231
Darkness.
hierarchy
"do t o w e r Above us i n t h e i r b e a u t y , and must r e i g n I n r i g h t t h e r e b y ; f o r ' t i s t h e e x t e r n a l law That f i r s t i n b e a u t y s h o u l d be f i r s t i n might: Yea, by t h a t law, a n o t h e r r a c e may d r i v e Our c o n q u e r o r s t o mourn as we do now." B e a u t y i s i m m o r t a l and always t h e same, i t s v i s i b l e
mani-
f e s t a t i o n s o n l y c h a n g i n g f r o m time t o t i m e as new f o r m s , more c a p a b l e o f r e f l e c t i n g t h e r e a l n a t u r e o f beauty, a p p e a r t o s u p e r c e d e t h e o l d ones. beauty i t s e l f ,
only,
But t h e s e v i s i b l e forms a r e n e v e r
19
Hyperion I 3i6-318
"symbols d i v i n e , M a n i f e s t a t i o n s o f t h a t beauteous l i f e , 5 i f f u s d unseen t h r o u g h o u t e t e r n a l space". f
T h i s i d e a i s n o t f u l l y worked
out because t h e poem
f i n i s h e d , b u t t h e t r u t h t h a t t h e poet i n t e n d e d the
w a r f a r e o f t h e G r e c i a n gods i l l u s t r a t e
forth,
I t h i n k , i n t h e passage
quoted,
isrun-
t o make
i s p l a i n l y set
rphis p r i n c i p l e we saw
i n Endymion where t h e I n d i a n woman and C y n t h i a a r e b o t h made t o s t a n d f o r t h e same b e a u t y - t h e i r a p p a r e n t d i f f e r e n c e b e i n g only a d i f f e r e n c e i n degree,
i n beauty
^ y n t h i a i s a f o r m more
c a p a b l e o f r e f l e c t i n g t h e r e a l n a t u r e o f b e a u t y , and t h e r e f o r e t h e I n d i a n woman v a n i s h e s when C y n t h i a a p p e a r s , j u s t a s the
o l d h i e r a r c h y o f gods g i v e s p l a c e t o t h e new
#
Thus, power and supremacy w i l l e v e r pass f r o m one f o r m o r a g e n c y t o a n o t h e r u n t i l a b s o l u t e b e a u t y i s r e v e a l e d t o man i n its reality.
T h i s l a w w o r k i n g i n n a t u r e and i n man makes
b e a u t y t h e dynamic
f o r c e i n a l l change and p r o g r e s s .
20
Hyperion, A V i s i o n , H y p e r i o n , A V i s i o n i s but a r e c a s t of t h e e a r l i e r Hy}
perion.
The s t o r y i s r e p r e s e n t e d as b e i n g r e v e a l e d to t h e
poet by Moneta, t h e o n l y s u r v i v e r o f t h e f a l l e n race o f gods. There i s a n i n t r o d u c t i o n o f 226 l i n e s which i s important a s e x p r e s s i n g some o f t h e a u t h o r ' s own o p i n i o n s c o n c e r n i n g human l i f e
and t h e c h a r a c t e r and m i s s i o n o f t h e poet.
i n t r o d u c t i o n i s perhaps the most p e r s o n a l o f K e a t s
1
!J!his
verses.
The poet f i n d s h i m s e l f i n a b e a u t i f u l garden where a sumptuous f e a s t i s s p r e a d .
He p a r t a k e s o f t h i s f e a s t and
drinks f r e e l y of a "cool vessel of transparent j u i c e " . d r i n k causes h i m t o s i n k iftto a deep swoon,
This
when h i s senses
r e t u r n t h e garden and f e a s t have v a n i s h e d and he i s i n an o l d h a l f - r u i n e d sanctuary*
A veiled priestess i s ministering at
an a l t e r b e f o r e an unknown image.
The poet makes h i s way t o
the s t e p s o f t h e a l t e r where the p r i e s t e s s addresses h i m . 11.107108
" I f t h o u c a n s t not ascend These s t e p s , d i e on the marble where t h o u a r t " and
further"The sands o f t h y s h o r t l i f e a r e spent t h i s hour, 11.114-117 And no hand i n t h e u n i v e r s e can t u r n Thy h o u r - g l a s s , i f these gummed l e a v e s be b u r n t E r e t h o u canst mount up t h e s e immortal s t e p s w i t h d i f f i c u l t y the poet ascends the marble stepB. Then f o l l o w s a very s i g n i f i c a n t 147-155
passage.
None c a n usurp t h i s h e i g h t 'returned t h a t shade ^ g those t o whom the m i s e r i e s o f t h e w o r l d Are m i s e r y , and w i l l not l e t them r e s t . A l l e l s e who f i n d a haven i n the w o r l d , where t h e y may t h o u g h t l e s s s l e e p away t h e i r d a y s , I f by a chance i n t o t h i s fajte t h e y come, Rot on t h e pavement where t h o u r o t t e d s t h a l f ' . •Are t h e s e not thousands i n t h e w o r l d * , s a i d I , u t
21
11.
155-181
Who l o v e t h e i r f e l l o w s even t o the death, Who f e e l the g i a n t agony of the w o r l d , And more, l i k e s l a v e s to poor humanity, Labor f o r m o r t a l good? I sure should see Other men h e r e , But I am here a l o n e , 'ThAse whom thou spakest of are no v i s i o n a r i e s R e j o i n e d t h a t v o i c e ; H h e y are no dreamers weak; They seek no wonder but the human f a c e , No music but a happy-noted v o i c e : They come not h e r e , they have no thought t o come; And t h o u a r t h e r e , f o r thou a r t l e s s t h a n t h e y . What b e n e f i t canst thou do, o r a l l t h y t r i b e , To the g r e a t world? Thou are a dreaming t h i n g , A f e v e r of t h y s e l f : Think o f the e a r t h ; What b l i s s , even i n hope, i s t h e r e f o r thee? What haven? e v e r y c r e a t u r e has i t s home, E v e r y s o l e man has days of j o y and p a i n , Wheth6r h i s l a b o u r s be sublime or lowThe p a i n a l o n e , the j o y a l o n e , d i s t i n c t : Only the dreamer venoms a l l h i s days, B e a r i n g more woes t h a n a l l h i s s i n s deserve* T h e r e f o r e , t h a t happiness be somewhat shared, Such t,hings as t h o u are a r e a d m i t t e d o f t I n t o l i k e gardens t h o u d i d s t pass e r e w h i l e , And s u f f e r e d i n t h e s e temples: f o r t h a t cause Thou standest s a f e beneath t h i s s t a t u e ' s k n e e s . 1
1
1 ff
The poet then l e a r n s t h a t he i s i n the temple of the f a l l e n T i t a n gods and t h a t the image b e f o r e him i s t h a t o f Saturn. 198-200
The p r i e s t e s s p i c t u r e s to him i n a v i s i o n
a war foughten l o n g s i n c e by g i a n t h i e r a r c h y a g a i n s t r e b e l l i o n . " At t h i s p o i n t b e g i n s the s t o r y w
of t h e f i r s t H y p e r i o n . i
T h i s i n t r o d u c t i o n i s c e r t a i n l y a l l e g o r i c a l and a way d e s c r i p t i v e of K e a t s
1
own l i f e ,
is in
tphe garden, the f e a s t ,
and the deep s l e e p stand f o r the e a r l y p e r i o d of h i s p o e t i c growth when sense p e r c e p t i o n alone r u l e d h i s p o e t i c n a t u r e . But he i s awakened from t h i s s l e e p to a r e a l i z a t i o n o f humaa responsibility.
The p r i e s t e s s , o r knowledge, p o i n t s out t o
t h e v i s i o n a r y the importance and n e c e s s i t y o f knowing p r a c t i c a l t h i n g s , knowledge i n s t r u c t s the dreamer t h a t he must
22
s h a r e i n t h e c a r e s and a c t i v i t i e s o f t h e w o r l d i n o r d e r t o s a v e h i m s e l f and t o p e r f o r m f u l l y t h e p o e t ' s m i s s i o n t o mankind.
The
f u r t h e r d i f f e r e n t d e t a i l s o f t h e opening l i n e s
yield
r e a d i l y t o v a r i o u s and f i t t i n g i n t e r p r e t a t i o n s ; but I h e s i t a t e h e r e t o g i v e them any d e f i n i t e meanings f o r t h e r e d a n g e r o f p r e s s i n g an a l l e g o r y too f a r . though that Keats
i s always
It i s very
likely
i n t e n d e d t o e x p r e s s more i n t h i s i n t r o d u c -
t i o n t h a n t h e one g e n e r a l meaning t h a t I have
indicated.
The d e s i r e f o r a h i g h e r sense o f t h e p r a c t i c a l i s f r e q u e n t l y e x p r e s s e d "by K e a t s •
We
saw
i n S l e e p and P o e t r y
t h a t , v e r y e a r l y i n l i f e , he f e l t t h e importance p o e t s s y m p a t h i z i n g w i t h t h e common s o r r o w s and f
o f men.
The
of the experiences
c o n v i c t i o n , t h e n , however, d i d not impress
w i t h suoh f o r c e as i t does h e r e *
T h i s l o n g i n g f o r a deeper
k n o w l e d g e o f human n a t u r e and a w i d e r v i s i o n o f a c t u a l n e v e r m a t e r i a l l y a f f e c t e d Keats« work. had he l i v e d l o n g e r ,
him
events
I t might have done so
^ u t I t h i n k i t i s d o u b t f u l whether t h i s
m e n t a l awakening would have e v e r d e v e l o p e d
into ahything
more t h a n i t d i d - a mere d e s i r e on h i s p a r t t o
interpret
p o e t i c a l l y " t h e a g o n i e s , t h e s t r i f e o f human h e a r t s . 1 1
The Odes. The Odes a r e K e a t s
1
f i n e s t work, and w i t h t h e b e a u t i f u l
Bve o f S t . Agnes, a r e the poems b e s t known and most c h a r a c t e r i s t i c of h i s genius. p r e s e n t no new
B e a u t i f u l as t h e y a r e , however, t h e y
o r p o w e r f u l thought.
There i s
i n them r e f l e c -
t i o n and s e n t i m e n t , some m o r a l i z i n g , and much m e d i t a t i o n , b u t t h e r e i s no deep o r s u b t l e meaning h a l f h i d d e n amidst the splendid
imagery.
The Ode t o Autumn r e v e a l s np i d e a o f n a t u r e d i f f e r e n t f r o m t h a t a l r e a d y e x p r e s s e d by K e a t s i n h i s e a r l i e r poems. The Odes on a G r e c i a n U r n , To P s y c h e , To Maia show K e a t s
1
a p p r e c i a t i o n and l o v e f o r t h e b e a u t y i n a n c i e n t a r t and l e gend.
T h i s t o o , though n e v e r so w e l l , he has e x p r e s s e d be-
fore.
The Odes To a N i g h t i n g a l e and To M e l a n c h o l y r e f l e c t t h e
c h a n g i n g m e n t a l s t a t e s and emotions o f t h e p o e t .
These
c h a n g i n g moods a r e , i n t h e m s e l v e s , as i n t e r e s t i n g as t h e i r e x p r e s s i o n i s b e a u t i f u l , but n^d not be c o n s i d e r e d here as t h e y show no g r e a t d e p t h of t h o u g h t . I n t h e Ode life
on a G r e c i a n Urn, t h e t r a n s i t o r i n e s s o f human
i s a e t o v e r a g a i n s t t h e permanency o f p l a s t i c a r t .
The
p o e t ends w i t h t h e famous axiom: "Beauty i s t r u t h , t r u t h b e a u t y - t h a t i s a l l Ye know on e a r t h , and a l l ye need t o know." A t h i n g , t o be b e a u t i f u l , must be complete p a r t s , must p o s s e s s symmetry and p r o p o r t i o n . K e a t s uses t h e word'completeness Endy.II 757
"beauty.
in a l l i t s I n one
instance
where he c l e a r l y means
"By a l l the s o f t completeness of the. f a c e " , he s a y s .
So a l s o t r u t h cannot he t r u t h and l a c k a n y t h i n g , t h a t i s , be s h o r t o f f u l l completeness.
H e r e i n i s t o be found t h e a n a l o g y
o r r a t h e r , t h e i d e n t i t y o f t r u t h an