The Phenomenology, Theory and Treatment of PTSD Edna B. Foa University of Pennsylvania Foa@ mail.med.upenn.edu
Outline of Lecture • What are common reactions to a traumatic event? Historical perspective and current view • Cognitive behavioral theories of PTSD. • Why do some people recover from trauma and others develop chronic PTSD ? • Exposure therapy for chronic PTSD: How effective is it? • What are the mechanisms underlying exposure therapy? • Is exposure therapy safe? • Dissemination of exposure therapy to CBT non-experts: Successes and challenges
Historical Perspective and Current View of Reactions to Traumatic Events
PTSD Across Recent History 1850-60’s
Crimean War
Neurasthenia
1860-1880’s
Railway accidents
Railway spine, spinal concussion
1860’s
US civil war
Soldier’s heart, irritable heart
1871
Da Costa’s syndrome
1910’s
WWI
Disordered action of the heart, effort syndrome, debility, neurocirculatory asthenia, shell shock, hysteria, combat exhaustion
1930’s-40’s
WWII
Combat fatigue, battle fatigue, war neurosis
1980
DSM-III
PTSD
1994
DSM-IV
Acute stress disorder
DSM IV Definition of a Traumatic Experience • A trauma is experiencing or witnessing an event that involves actual or perceived threat of death or injury to oneself or to another person and also • Feeling horrified, terrified or helpless during the event
Examples of Traumatic Experiences • Interpersonal violence • Physical assault, captivity, sexual (rape, incest), combat trauma, terrorism
• Accidents • Car accident, near drowning, work-place injury, serious burn
• Natural Disasters • Earthquake, tsunami, hurricane, typhoon, flooding, tornado
• Other events • Unexpected death of family member or close friend • Seeing another person seriously injured or dying
The Collapse of World Trade Center
The Destruction in New Orleans
Common Reactions During Trauma • Feeling horrified and terrified • Grief and deep sadness • Disbelief, shock, and helplessness
Expression of Horror Watching the WTC Collapsing
Expression of Grief Watching the WTC Collapsing
Expression of Hopelessness After Katrina
Reaction During and After the Great Fire of London, 1666 “A horrid malicious blood fire … so great was our fear, it was enough to put us out of our wits. Afterwards, new [sight] of a chimney fire some distance away put me into much fear and trouble.” Samuel Pepys
After the trauma, trauma reminders evoke reactions, such as fear, to situations which are similar to those experienced during the trauma
Common Reactions After War: Physioneurosis • Persistence of startle response • Proclivity to explosive outbursts • Fixation on the trauma • Constriction of personality • Atypical dream life Kardiner, 1941
DSM-IV Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms • A. Reexperiencing: Distressing thoughts and feelings about the trauma, nightmares, and flashbacks • B. Avoidance and numbing: avoiding traumarelated situations, thoughts and activities, diminished interest in activities, detachment from others, and restricted range of affect • C. Increased arousal: Sleep disturbances, outburst of anger, difficulty concentrating, hypervigilance
Prevalence of PTSD and Its Cost
PTSD as a Worldwide Problem Germany USA
1.3% 7.8%
Ethiopia
15.8%
Cambodia
28.4%
Algeria
37.4%
de Jong et al., 2001; Kessler et al, 1995; Perkonnig et al., 2000
Prevalence of Trauma and PTSD in Men and Women in the US 100
91.9
90
79.6
Percent (%)
80 70
60.7
60
Trauma PTSD No PTSD
51.2
50 40 30
20.4
20 10
8.1
0 Men
Women
Kessler 1995
Rate of PTSD is Influenced by the Nature of the Trauma Trauma
PTSD
60
Percent
50 40 30 20 10 0 Disaster
Accident
Assault
Molestation
Combat*
Rape
Kessler et al., 1995.
Rate of Recovery After Rape
94%
47% 42%
% with PTSD Symptoms
30 %
25%-15%
?
W
3m
9m 12m
Years
Data form Rothbaum et al., 1992
Impaired Quality of Life With PTSD PTSD
MDD
OCD
US Population
100
Mean SF-36 Score
75
50
25
0 Vitality
Social Function
SF-36 = 36-item short form health survey; lower score = more impairment.
Malik et al.,1999
Summary of Reactions to Trauma • The majority of trauma victims recover with time • PTSD represents a failure of natural recovery • If PTSD does not remit within a year, it will last a lifetime unless treated • PTSD is a highly distressing and debilitating disorder
Cognitive Behavioral Theories of Anxiety Disorders Including PTSD
Cognitive Behavioral Theories of Anxiety Disorders • Theories of classical and operant conditioning that emphasize learning of associations between stimuli and responses (conditioning theory) • Cognitive theories that emphasize the meaning ascribed to events • An assumption that anxiety disorders reflect deficits in coping with anxiety
Cognitive behavioral theories of PTSD are extensions of the above theories of anxiety disorders
Conditioning Theory of Anxiety Disorders • Stage 1 (Acquisition of Fear): Neutral stimuli (e.g., sound) become associated with fear eliciting stimuli (e.g., shock) and thus acquire the ability to elicit fear (classical conditioning) • Stage 2 (Acquisition of Avoidance): Fear is an aversive state, and organisms are motivated to escape or avoid such states. The behavior that is associated with fear reduction (e.g., avoidance, escape) is reinforced and tends to be repeated (instrumental conditioning). Mowrer (1939)
Conditioning Theory of PTSD: Acquisition of Fear (Stage 1) “…a phobia acquired under conditions of combat… provide[s] one of the simplest and most convincing illustrations of the learning of symptoms… [an] officer had not shown any abnormal fear of airplanes before being sent on a difficult mission…Many times during this mission the pilot was exposed to intensely fear-provoking stimuli, such the sight of planes going down and comrades being killed. It is known that intense fear-provoking stimuli of this kind act to reinforce fear response to other cues presented at the same time…” Dollar & Miller (1950)
Conditioning Theory of PTSD: Acquisition of Avoidance (Stage 2) "...Under traumatic conditions of combat the intense drive of fear was learned as a response to the airplane...this intense fear motivated responses of avoiding airplanes, and whenever any one of these responses was successful, it was reinforced by a reduction in the strength of the fear." Dollar & Miller (1950)
Cognitive Theory of Anxiety Disorders • Cognitive theory of emotional disorders assumes emotional reactions are produced by the interpretations of events rather than by the events themselves • Accordingly, different interpretations of the same event evoke different emotions. • Each emotion is associated with a particular type of interpretation • The characteristic interpretation associated with anxiety is perceived danger • Anxiety disorders occur when safe situations are interpreted as dangerous (dysfunctional interpretations)
Cognitive Theory of PTSD • Chronic PTSD symptoms are a consequence of the the victim's dysfunctional interpretations regarding: • Themselves (e.g., negative self esteem) • The traumatic event (e.g., “the trauma was my fault”) • Their PTSD symptoms (e.g., PTSD symptoms are sign of weakness) • People and the world (e.g., loss of trust, lack of safety) • Their future (e.g, “I will never be the same person again”)
Emotional Processing Theory of Anxiety Disorders • Emotional processing theory integrates concepts from conditioning theory and cognitive theory to provide a more comprehensive account of anxiety disorders. It proposes that: • Anxiety occurs when a cognitive fear structure is evoked • Each anxiety disorder is characterized by a specific pathological fear structure • Recovery occurs through modification of the pathological fear structure
Fear Structure • A fear structure is a program for escaping danger that includes representations of: • Feared stimuli, fear responses, and the associations among them (conditioning theory) • The meaning of stimuli and responses (cognitive theory)
Emotional Processing Theory of PTSD Invokes emotional processing theory of anxiety disorders to explain: • Early PTSD symptoms • Natural Recovery • Development, maintenance and treatment of PTSD
Emotional Processing Theory of PTSD: The Trauma Memory A trauma memory is a specific fear structure that includes representations of: • Stimuli present during the trauma • Physiological and behavioral responses that occurred during the trauma • Meanings associated with these stimuli and responses Associations among stimulus, response, and meaning representations may be realistic (functional) or unrealistic (dysfunctional)
Schematic Model of a Memory Shortly After the Rape Afraid
Uncontrollable
I - Me Say “I love you”
Rape Alone
Shoot
Suburbs Home
Scream Freeze
Confused
Man Tall Gun Bald
PTSD Symptoms
Incompetent
Dangerous
Summary: Characteristics of a Trauma Structure • Large number of stimuli • Excessive responses (PTSD symptoms) • Erroneous associations between stimuli and “danger” • Erroneous associations between responses and “incompetent” • Fragmented and poorly organized relationships among representations
Early PTSD Symptoms • Trauma reminders in daily life activate the trauma memory and the associated perception of “danger” and “ self incompetence”. • Activation of the trauma memory is reflected in reexperiencing symptoms and arousal • Re-experiencing and arousal motivate avoidance behavior.
Recovery Processes • Repeated activation of the trauma memory (emotional engagement) • Incorporation of corrective information about “world” and “self” • Activation and disconfirmation occur via confronting trauma reminders (e.g., thinking about, and contact with trauma reminders) • Corrective information consists of the absence of the anticipated harm
Schematic Model of a Recovered Rape Memory Afraid
Uncontrollable
I - Me Say “I love you”
Rape Alone
Man Shoot
Suburbs Home
Scream
Tall Gun Bald
Freeze
Confused
Incompetent
Dangerous
Psychological Mechanisms that Maintain PTSD Persistent cognitive and behavioral avoidance prevents change in the trauma memory by: • Limiting activation of the trauma memory • Limiting exposure to corrective information • Preventing organization of the memory
Schematic Model of a Rape Memory of Chronic PTSD Afraid
Uncontrollable
I - Me Say “I love you”
Rape Alone
Shoot
Suburbs Home
Scream Freeze
Confused
Man Tall Gun Bald
PTSD Symptoms
Incompetent
Dangerous
Dysfunctional, Negative Cognitions Underlying PTSD • The world is extremely dangerous • People are untrustworthy • No place is safe • I (the victim) am extremely incompetent • PTSD symptoms are a sign of weakness • Other people would have prevented the trauma
Negative Cognitions Severity
Severity of Negative Cognitions and PTSD 6
Negative Thoughts About Self Negative Thoughts About World Self-Blame
5 4 3 2 1 0 No Trauma
Trauma/ No PTSD
PTSD
Empirical Evidence for the Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment • Exposure therapy • Cognitive therapy • Anxiety management or stress inoculation training
Exposure Therapy • Derived from conditioning and extinction theory • A set of techniques that are designed to reduce pathological anxiety through extinction by encouraging patients to confront their feared objects, situations, memories, and images in the absence of aversive consequence • Extinction includes severing the association between safe situations and the meaning of “danger”, so that these situations acquire the meaning of “safety” and are no longer feared
Cognitive Therapy • Derived from cognitive theory of emotional disorders • A set of techniques that help patients change their dysfunctional interpretations of safe situations (i.e., dysfunctional cognitions) by: • Identifying the dysfunctional cognitions • Challenging these cognitions • Replacing these cognitions with functional, realistic cognitions
Anxiety Management • Derived from the assumption that anxiety disorders reflect deficits in coping with anxiety • A set of techniques that helps patients manage their anxiety • Relaxation Training • Controlled Breathing • Positive Self-talk and Imagery • Social Skills Training • Distraction Techniques (e.g., thought stopping)
Similarities Among CBT Treatments for Chronic PTSD • All CBT treatments: • Promote safe confrontations with trauma memories and with situations that are trauma reminders • Modify the dysfunctional cognitions underlying PTSD
Published Randomized Studies on Exposure Therapy (EX) Only and EX Plus SIT or CR Chronic PTSD: • EX therapy only
15 studies
• Ex therapy + SIT and/or CR
16 studies
Acute PTSD or ASD • EX only
1 study
•
5 studies
Ex therapy + SIT and/or CR
The Advantages of Exposure Therapy • Exposure therapy, cognitive therapy, and anxiety management are all effective in treating chronic PTSD and associated psychopathology. What are the advantages of exposure therapy? • It has received the most empirical evidence with a wide range of traumas • It has been compared to several other CBT programs for PTSD • It has been successfully disseminated in community clinical settings with no special expertise with CBT
Exposure Therapy Programs • Two exposure therapy programs have been utilized in randomized controlled studies • Foa et al.’s “Prolonged Exposure” program (PE) • Marks et al.’s “Exposure Therapy” program (EX)
Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE) for PTSD • Breathing retraining: 10 minutes in session 1 • Education about common reactions to trauma (25 minutes in session 2) • Imaginal exposure (reliving) to the trauma memory (30-45 minutes during sessions 3-12) • In vivo exposure to trauma reminders in life between sessions • 9-12 weekly or twice weekly 90-minute sessions
Prolonged Exposure (PE) Therapy for PTSD (cont’d) • Imaginal exposure: Patients recount the traumatic memories during sessions and listen to the taperecorded recounting between sessions • In vivo exposure: Patients confront safe traumarelated situations and objects between sessions, beginning with less fearful situations and moving on to more fearful ones
Exposure Therapy (EX) for PTSD • 8 or 10 weekly 90-minute sessions • 4 or 5 session of imaginal reliving of trauma during sessions and as homework • 4 or 5 sessions of in vivo exposure to anxiety provoking/avoided situations with homework
Both the PE and EX programs include intensive imaginal and in vivo exposure and therefore they are treated as equivalent programs
Study I With Women Assault Victims Treatments: • Prolonged Exposure (PE) • Stress Inoculation Training (SIT) • SIT + PE • Wait List Controls
Treatments included 9 sessions conducted over 5 weeks Foa et al.,1999
Comparison of PE, SIT, PE/SIT, and Waitlist With Female Assault Survivors P S S -I T o ta l
40
Pre Post FU
30 20 10 0 PE
SIT
PE+SIT
WL Foa et al., 1999
Effect Size of PTSD Symptoms
Post-Rx Effect Sizes* of PE vs SIT vs PE/SIT: PTSD PE SIT SIT/PE
2 1.5 1 0.5 0 TOTAL
Reexp.
Arousal
*Effect size compared to wait-list group at post-treatment
Avoidance Foa et al., 1999
Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) • Cognitive restructuring (Beck, Ellis) focusing on: Safety Trust Power
Esteem Intimacy
• Repeated writing of the traumatic experience • Treatment consists of 12 weekly sessions
Comparison of PE, CPT, and Waitlist With Female Assault Survivors
C A P S T o tal
90
Pre Post FU
60 30 0 PE PE = CPT
CPT
WL Resick et al., 2002
Comparison of CPT and Waitlist With Male and Female Veterans (ITT)
CAPS Total
Pre 80
Post
60
1-Mo FU
40 20 0 CPT
CPT < WL on re-experiencing and numbing
WL
Monson et al., 2005
PE Among 16 U.S. Veterans (PG, VN, OIF, WWII) Plus One EMT
PSS-SR Total
40 30
Pre Post
20 10 0
VN = Vietnam, n = 10; PG = Persian Gulf, n = 4; OIF = Operation Iraqi Freedom, n = 1; WWII = World War 2, n = 1; EMT = Emergency Medical Technician, n = 1.
Albrecht, unpublished
Comparison of CT, Self-help Booklet and Waitlist With MVA Pre Post
PDS Total
30
6-Mo FU 20 10 0 CT CT< Booklet = WL
Self-help Booklet
WL Ehlers et al., 2003
PDS
Comparison of CT and Waitlist With Adult Survivors of Terrorist attack 40
Pre
30
Post
20 10 0 CT Gillespie et al., 2002
Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) • Access trauma images and memories • Evaluate their aversive qualities • Generate alternative cognitive appraisal • Focus on the alternative • Sets of lateral eye movements while focusing on response
Comparison of EX, EMDR, and Relaxation With Mixed Trauma Survivors C A P S T o tal
90 Pre Post FU
60 30 0 EX EX EMDR
6 Mo FU
Rothbaum et al., 2005
Comparison of Ex/CR, EMDR, and Waitlist With Mixed Gender/Trauma Sample SIP (SR) Total
60
Pre Post
40 20 0 EX+CR
EMDR
WL Power et al., 2002
EX/CR = EMDR
Study II With Women Assault Victims Treatments: • Exposure (PE) alone • PE + Cognitive Restructuring (PE/CR) • Wait List (WL) Treatment includes 9 weekly sessions, extended to 12 for partial responders (< 70% improvement) Foa et al., 2005
Comparison of PE, PE/CR, and Waitlist With Female Assault Survivors
P S S -I T o tal
40
Pre Post FU
30 20 10 0 PE
PE = PE/CR < WL
PE/CR
WL Foa et al., 2005
Effect Size of PTSD Symptoms
Within Group Effect Sizes PE PE/CR WL
3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0
PSS-I
BDI Foa et al., 2005
Comparison of PE and PE/CR for Female Survivors of Rape, Physical Assault, and Childhood Sexual Abuse P S S -I T o tal
40
Pre Post FU
30 20 10 0 Rape
Rape = PA + CSA
Physical Assault
CSA Foa et al., 2005
Comparison of PE and PE/CR With Survivors of Torture C A P S T o tal
100 Pre Post FU
80 60 40 20 0 PE PE = PE/CR
PE/CR Paunovic & Ost, 2001
Study with Men and Women Victims of Mixed Traumas Treatments: • Exposure (PE) • Cognitive Restructuring (CR) • PE + CR • Relaxation Training Treatment consisted of 10 sessions conducted over 16 weeks Marks et al., 1998
Good End State Functioning Post Treatment* Perecent Responders
60 50 40 30 20 10 0
PE
SIT
PE/SIT
Foa et al., 1999
WL
PE
CR
PE/CR
R
Marks et al., 1998
* > 50% improved on PTSD; Standard Error of the Difference (based on SD and test-retest reliability; 7.5 points in the PSSI, 11.4 points on the CAPS)
Dropout Rate in Different Treatments Treatment (25 studies)
Total n
% Dropout
EX Alone SIT or CT Alone
330 222
20.6% 22.1%
EX plus CT or SIT
335
26.0%
EMDR
143
18.9%
Controls (Active and WL)
543
11.4%
No difference among active treatments: χ2 (3, N= 1030) = 1.73, p = 0.631 Hembree et al. 2003
Dissemination of Exposure Therapy to CBT Non-experts: Successes and Challenges
Dissemination Model I: Training Community Clinicians • 4- 5-day intensive training of community therapists by Penn experts • Ongoing weekly supervision which includes review of session videotape by Penn experts and feedback either in person or by email and telephone
PE Effectiveness for PE Experts and Community Therapists in Female Assault Survivors in Philadelphia 40 Pre
35
Post
PSS-I Total
30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Expert
Community Foa et al., 2005
Comparison of PE, PCT, and Waitlist With Female Veterans Pre Post 3-Mo FU 6-Mo FU
CAPS Total
80 60 40 20 0 PE PE