The investigation phase in international criminal procedure: in search of common rules de Meester, K.F.G

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The investigation phase in international criminal procedure: in search of common rules de Meester, K.F.G. Lin...
Author: Lucy Dean
3 downloads 0 Views 265KB Size
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

The investigation phase in international criminal procedure: in search of common rules de Meester, K.F.G.

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA): de Meester, K. (2014). The investigation phase in international criminal procedure: in search of common rules

General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl) Download date: 16 jan. 2017

BIBLIOGRAPHY Books ABELS, D., Prisoners of the International Community: The Legal Position of Persons Detained at International Criminal Tribunals, The Hague, T.M.C. Asser Press, 2012, 847p. ARENDT, H., Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, London, Penguin Books, 1994, 312p. ASHWORTH, A. and REDMAYNE, M., The Criminal Process, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005, 415p. BASSIOUNI, M.C., International Extradition, United States Law And Practice (5th ed.), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007, 1166p. BATES, A., Transitional Justice in Cambodia, Analytical Report, 2010, 102p. (available at: http://projetatlas.univ-paris1.fr/IMG/pdf/ATLAS_Cambodia_Report_FINAL_EDITS_ Feb2011.pdf, last visited 10 February 2014). BERGSMO, M., HELVIG, K., UTMELIDZE, I. and ŽAGOVEC, G., The Backlog of Core International Crimes Cases in Bosnia and Herzegovina (2nd ed.), Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, Oslo, 2010, 218p. BOAS, G., BISCHOFF, J.L., REID, N.L. and DON TAYLOR III, B., International Criminal Law Practitioner Library, Vol. III: International Criminal Procedure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2011, 486p. BOAS, G., The Milošević Trial: Lessons for the Conduct of Complex International Criminal Proceedings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007, 306p. BOCKSTAELE, M. et al., De zoeking onderzocht, Antwerpen, Maklu, 2009, 403p. BOHLANDER, M., BOED, R. and WILSON, R.J. (eds.), Defense in International Criminal Proceedings: Cases, Materials and Commentary, Ardsley, Transnational Publishers, 2006, 899p. BOHLANDER, M., Principles of German Criminal Procedure, Oxford and Portland, Hart Publishing, 2012, 306p. BOISTER N. and CRYER, R., The Tokyo International Military Tribunal: A Reappraisal, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008, 358p. BOSSUYT, M., Guide to the Travaux Préparatoires of the ICCPR, Dordrecht, Nijhoff Publishers, 1987, 841p. BOURDOUX, G., DE RAEDT, E., DE MESMAEKER, M. and LINERS, A., De wet op het politieambt. Handboek van de politiefunctie, Brussel, Politeia, 2010, 781p. 1045

BUISMAN, C., Ascertainment of the Truth in International Criminal Justice, 2012, 393p (available at: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/6555, last visited 18 November 2013). CAPE, E., HODGSON, J., PRAKKEN, T. and SPRONKEN, T. (eds.), Suspects in Europe: Procedural Rights at the Investigative Stage of the Criminal Process in the European Union, Oxford, Intersentia, 2007, 280p. CARTER, L. and POCAR, F. (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: The Interface of Civil Law and Common Law Legal Systems, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013, 246p. CASSESE, A., Five Masters of International Law: Conversations with R.-J. Dupuy, E. Jiménez de Aréchaga, R. Jennings, L. Henkin and O. Schachter, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2011, 286p. CASSESE, A., International Criminal Law (2nd Ed.), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008, 455p. CASSESE, A., The Tokyo Trial and Beyond: Reflections of a Peacemonger, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1993, 143p. CIORCIARI, J.D. and HEINDEL, A., Experiments in International Criminal Justice: Lessons from the Khmer Rouge Tribunal, June 2013, 77p (available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/ sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2269925, last visited 10 February 2014). COMBS, N.A., Fact-Finding Without Facts, The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations of International Criminal Convictions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010, 420p. CORSTENS, C.J.M., Het Nederlands Strafprocesrecht, Deventer, Kluwer, 2008, 964p. CRYER, R., FRIMAN, H., ROBINSON, D. and WILMSHURST, E., An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010, 618p. CRYER, R., Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005, 360p. DAMAŠKA, M.R., The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process, New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 1986, 242p. DE SMET, B., Internationale samenwerking in strafzaken tussen Angelsaksische en continentale landen, Intersentia, Antwerpen – Groningen, 1999, 226p. DE VLAMING, F., De Aanklager: Het Joegoslavië-tribunaal en de selectie van verdachten, Den Haag, Boom Juridische Uitgevers, 2010, 272p. DENZA, E., Diplomatic Law: Commentary on the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (3rd Edition), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008, 556p. DRUMBL, M., Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007, 298p. 1046

EL ZEIDY, M.M., The Principle of Complementarity in International Criminal Law: Origin, Development and Practice, Leiden – Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008, 366p. FEDOROVA, M., The Principle of Equality of Arms in International Criminal Proceedings, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2012, (non-commercial edition), 529p. GINSBURGS, G. and KUDRIAVTSEV, V.N., The Nuremberg Trial and International Law, Dordrecht – Boston – London, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1990, 288p. HARRIS, D.J., O’BOYLE, M. and WARBRICK, C., Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009, 902p. HAUCK, P., Judicial Decisions in the Pre-Trial Phase of Criminal Proceedings in France, Germany and England: a Comparative Analysis Responding to the Law of the International Criminal Court, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlaggesellschaft, 2008, 82p. HIRSCH BALLIN, M.F.H., Anticipative Criminal Investigation: Theory and Counterterrorism Practice in the Netherlands and the United States, The Hague, T.M.C. Asser Press, 2012, 683p. JACKSON, J.D. and SUMMERS, S.J., The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence: Beyond the Common Law and Civil Law Traditions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2012, 405p. JURDI, N.J., The International Criminal Court and National Courts, Farnham, Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2011, 303p. KAZAZI, M., Burden of Proof and Related Issues: A Study of Evidence Before International Tribunals, The Hague – London – Boston, Kluwer Law International, 1996, 406p. KLAMBERG, M., Evidence in International Criminal Procedure: Confronting Legal Gaps and the Reconstruction of Disputed Events, Stockholm, Stockholm University, 502p. KLEFFNER, J., Complementarity in the Rome Statute and National Criminal Jurisdictions, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008, 385p. KNOOPS, G.-J.A., Surrendering to the International Criminal Court: Contemporary Practice and Procedures, Ardsley, Transnational Publishers, 2005, 382p. KNOOPS, G.-J.A., Theory and Practice of International and Internationalized Criminal Proceedings, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2005, 358p. MACDONALD, G.K. and SWAAK-GOLDMAN, O.Q., (eds.), Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal Law: the Experience of International and National Courts, Vol. I, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2000, 702p. MALANCZUK, P., Akehurst’s Modern Introduction in International Law (7th revised ed.), London and New York, Routledge, 1997, 449p.

1047

MAY, R. and WIERDA, M., International Criminal Evidence, Ardsley, Transnational Publishers, 2002, 369p. MCCONVILLE, M., HODGSON, J., BRIDGES, L. and PAVLOVIC, A., Standing Accused: The Organisation and Practices of Criminal Defence Lawyers in Britain, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994, 332p. MCCONVILLE, M., SANDERS, A. and LENG, R., The Case for the Prosecution, London, Routledge, 1991, 227p. McGONIGLE LEYH, B., Procedural Justice? Victim Participation in International Criminal Proceedings, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2011, 452p. MORRIS, V. and SCHARF, M.P., An Insider Guide to the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: A Documentary History and Analysis (Vol. I), Ardsley, Transnational Publishers, 1995, 1192p. NOWAK, M., U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR commentary (2nd edition), Kehl am Rein, Engel, 2005, 1277p. O’CONNOR, V. and RAUSCH, C., (eds.), Model Codes for Post-Conflict Criminal Justice (Vol. II), Washington D.C., United States Institute of Peace Press, 2008, 554p. OLÁSOLO, H., The Triggering Procedure of the International Criminal Court, Leiden – Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005, 400p. ONSEA, I., De bestrijding van georganiseerde misdaad: de grens tussen waarheidsvinding en grondrechten, Antwerpen, Intersentia, 2008, 533p. PAULUSSEN, C., Male Captus Bene Detentus? Surrendering Suspects to the International Criminal Court, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2010, 1195p. PESKIN, V., International Justice in Rwanda and the Balkans: Virtual Trials and the Struggle for State Cooperation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008, 272p. RAIMONDO, F.O., General Principles of Law in the Decisions of International Criminal Courts and Tribunals, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008, 212p. RAZESBERGER, F., The International Criminal Court: The Principle of Complementarity, Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang, 2006, 201p. REYDAMS, L., WOUTERS, J. and RYNGAERT, C. (eds.), International Prosecutors, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, 968p. SAFFERLING, C., International Criminal Procedure, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, 602p. SAFFERLING, C.J.M., Towards an International Criminal Procedure, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001, 395p.

1048

SCHABAS, W.A., An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007, 548p. SCHABAS, W.A., The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010, 1259p. SCHABAS, W.A., The UN International Criminal Tribunals: The Former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, 711p. SCHUON, C., International Criminal Procedure: A Clash of Legal Cultures, The Hague, T.M.C. Asser Press, 2010, 365p. SHAW, N., International Law (6th Edition), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008, 1542p. SHELTON, D., Remedies in International Human Rights Law (2nd ed.), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005, 502p. SLUITER, G., International Criminal Adjudication and the Collection of Evidence: Obligations of States, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2002, 441p. STEGMILLER, I., The Pre-Investigation Stage of the ICC, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot GmbH, 2011, 624p. SULLIVAN, E.T. and FRASE, R.S., Proportionality Principles in American Law: Controlling Excessive Government Actions, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009, 284p. SUMMERS, S.J., Fair Trials: the European Criminal Procedural Tradition and the European Court of Human Rights, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2007, 188p. TAK, P.J.P., VAN EIKEMA HOMMES, G.A., MANUNZA, E.R. and MULDER, C.F., De normering van bijzondere opsporingsmethoden in buitenlandse rechtsstelsels, Den Haag, Ministerie van Justitie, 1996, 361p. TOCHILOVSKY, V., Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Courts and the European Court of Human Rights: Procedure and Evidence, Leiden – Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008, 912p. TRECHSEL, S., Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005, 611p. TUINSTRA, J.T., Defence Counsel in International Criminal Law, The Hague, T.M.C. Asser Press, 2009, 323p. VAN DEN WYNGAERT, C., Criminal Procedures in the European Community, Brussels, Butterworths, 1993, 408p. VAN DEN WYNGAERT, C., Strafrecht en strafprocesrecht, Maklu, Antwerpen-Apeldoorn, 2009, 1286p.

1049

VAN SLIEDREGT, E., SJÖCRONA, J.M., ORIE, A.M.M., Handboek Internationaal Strafrecht, Schets van het Europese en Internationale Strafrecht, Deventer, Kluwer, 2008, 411p. VAN TRAA, M., Enquête Opsporingsmethoden: Eindrapport, 1996, 484p. VASILIEV, S., Fairness and its Metric in International Criminal Procedure, 2013, 66p (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2253177, last visited 14 February 2014). VERREST, P.A.M, Raison d’être: een onderzoek naar de rol van de rechter-commissaris in ons strafproces, Den Haag, Boom Juridische Uitgevers, 2011, 377p. VERSTRAETEN, R., Handboek Strafvordering, Antwerpen – Apeldoorn, Maklu, 2003, 895p. VOGLER, R., A World View of Criminal Justice, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2005, 330p. WEI, W., Die Rolle des Anklägers eines internationalen Strafgerichtshofs, Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang, 2007, 348p. WEXLER, S. (ed.), Observations on the Consolidated ICC Text before the Final Session of the Preparatory Committee, Toulouse, Association Internationale de droit pénal, Érès, 1998, 249p. X, ICTY Manual on Developed Practices, Turin, UNICRI Publisher, 2009, 228p. ZAHAR, A. and SLUITER, G., International Criminal Law: A Critical Introduction, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008, 530p. ZAPPALÀ, S., Human rights in International Criminal Proceedings, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003, 280p. ZUCKERMAN, A.A.S., The Principles of Criminal Evidence, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1989, 378p.

Journal Articles ACQUAVIVA, G., Human Rights Violations before International Tribunals: Reflections on Responsibility of International Organizations, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 20, 2007, pp. 613 – 636. ACQUAVIVA, G., New Paths in International Criminal Justice: The Internal Rules of the Cambodian Extraordinary Chambers, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 6, 2008, pp. 129 – 151. AFFOLDER, N.A., Tadić, the Anonymous Witness and the Sources of International Procedural Law, in «Michigan Journal of International Law», Vol. 19, 1998, pp. 445 – 495.

1050

AKANDE, D., International Law and the International Criminal Court, in «American Journal of International Law», Vol. 98, 2004, pp. 407 – 433. AKANDE, D., The Legal Nature of Security Council Referrals to the ICC and its Impact on Al Bashir’s Immunities, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 7, 2009, p. 333 – 352. AKHAVAN, P., Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?, in «American Journal of International Law», Vol. 95, 2001, pp. 7 – 31. AMBOS, K., Confidential Investigations (Article 54 (3)(e) ICC Statute) vs. Disclosure Obligations: the Lubanga Case and National Law, in «New Criminal Law Review», Vol. 12, 2009, pp. 543 – 568. AMBOS, K., International Criminal Procedure: “Adversarial”, “Inquisitorial” or Mixed?, in «International Criminal Law Review», Vol. 3, 2003, pp. 1-37. AMBOS, K., Judicial Creativity at the Special Tribunal for Lebanon: Is there a Crime of Terrorism under International Law?, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 24, 2011, pp. 655 – 675. AMBOS, K., The First Judgment of the International Criminal Court (Prosecutor v. Lubanga): A Comprehensive Analysis of the Legal Issues, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 12, 2012, pp. 115 – 153. AMBOS, K., The Right of Non-Self-Incrimination of Witnesses Before the ICC, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 15, 2002, pp. 155 – 177. AMBOS, K., The Status, Role and Accountability of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court: A Comparative Overview on the Basis of 33 National Reports, in «European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice», Vol. 8/2, 2000, pp. 98 – 118. ARBOUR, L., Progress and Challenges in International Criminal Justice, in «Fordham International Law Journal», Vol. 21, 1997-1998, pp. 531 – 540. ARBOUR, L., The Crucial Years, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 2, 2004, pp. 396 – 402. ARSANJANI, H. and REISMAN, W.M., The Law-in-Action of the International Criminal Court, in «American Journal of International Law», Vol. 99, 2005, pp. 385 – 403. BAIR, J.P., From the Numbers who Died to Those who Survived: Victim Participation in the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, in «University of Hawai’i Law Review», Vol. 31, 2009, pp. 507 – 552. BANK, R., Cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia in the Production of Evidence, in «Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law», Vol. 4, 2000, pp. 233 – 269.

1051

BÁRD, K., The Difficulties of Writing the Past Through Law – Historical Trials Revisited at the European Court of Human Rights, in «International Review of Penal Law», Vol. 81, 2010, pp. 27 – 44. BASSIOUNI, C., Human Rights in the Context of International Justice: Identifying International Procedural Protections and Equivalent Protections in National Constitutions, in «Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law», Vol. 3, 1993, pp. 235 – 293. BAYLIS, E., Outsourcing Investigations, in «UCLA Journal of International Law & Foreign Affairs», Vol. 14, 2009, pp. 121 – 147. BENSOUDA, F., The ICC Statute – An Insider’s Perspective on a Sui Generis System for Global Justice, in «North-Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation», Vol. 36, 2010 - 2011, pp. 277 – 286. BERESFORD, S., Redressing the Wrongs of the International Criminal Justice System: Compensation for Persons Erroneously Detained, Prosecuted or Convicted by the Ad Hoc Tribunals, in «The American Journal of International Law», Vol. 96, 2002, pp. 628 – 645. BERGER, M., The Right To Silence in The Hague International Criminal Courts, in «University of San Francisco School of Law Review», Vol. 47, 2012, pp. 1-54. BERKMOES, H. and LYBAERT, D., Proactieve politie bevoegdheden en (bijzondere) middelen in de strijd tegen de georganiseerde criminaliteit, in «Custodes», 1999 (1), pp. 33 – 52. BIBAS, S. and BURKE-WHITE, W.W., International Idealism Meets Domestic-CriminalProcedure Realism, in «Duke Law Journal», Vol. 59, 2010, pp. 637 – 704. BOAS, G., Creating Laws of Evidence for International Criminal Law: the ICTY and the Principle of Flexibility, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 12, 2001, pp. 41 – 90. BOAS, G., Developments in the Law of Procedure and Evidence at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Criminal Court, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 12, 2001, pp. 167 – 183. BONOMY, I., The Reality of Conducting a War Crimes Trial, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 5, 2007, pp. 348 – 359. BOS, A., 1948-1998: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Statute of the International Criminal Court, in «Fordham International Law Journal», Vol. 22, 1998-1999, pp. 229 – 235. BOSCO, D., The International Criminal Court and Crime Prevention: Byproduct or Conscious Goal, in «Michigan State Journal of International Law», Vol. 19, 2011, pp. 163 – 200. BOURGON, S., Procedural Problems Hindering Expeditious and Fair Justice, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 2, 2004, pp. 526 – 532.

1052

BRAMMERTZ, S., La recherche proactive en droit comparé et dans les instruments internationaux, in «Custodes», 1999 (1), pp. 127 – 143. BRANTS, C. and FIELD, S., Les méthodes d’enquête proactive et le contrôle des risques, in «Déviance et Société», Vol. 21, 1997, pp. 401 - 414. BRESLER, K., Pretty Phrases: The Prosecutor as Minister of Justice and Administration of Justice, in «Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics», Vol. 9, 1995-1996, pp. 1301 – 1334. BRONITT, S., The Law in Undercover Policing: A Comparative Study of Entrapment and Covert Interviewing in Australia, Canada and Europe, in «Common Law World Review», Vol. 33, 2004, pp. 35 – 80. BROWN, C., The Cross-Fertilization of Principles Relating to Procedure and Remedies in the Jurisprudence of International Courts and Tribunals, in «Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review», Vol. 30, 2008, pp. 219 – 245. BRUBACHER, M.R., Prosecutorial Discretion in the International Criminal Court, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 2, 2004, pp. 71 – 95. BUISMAN, C., Delegating Investigations: Lessons to be Learned from the Lubanga Judgment, in «Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights», Vol. 11, 2013, pp. 30 – 82. BURKE-WHITE, W.W., Implementing a Policy of Positive Complementarity in the Rome System of Justice, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 19, 2008, pp. 59 – 85. BUZZARD, L., Comments: Holding an Arsonist’s Feet to the Fire? – The Legality and Enforceability of the ICC’s Arrest Warrant for Sudanese President Omar Al-Bashir, in «American University International Law Review», Vol. 24, 2008 – 2009, pp. 897 – 941. CAIANIELLO, M., First Decisions on the Admission of Evidence at ICC Trials: A Blending of Accusatorial and Inquisitorial Models?, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 9, 2011, pp. 385 – 410. CAIANIELLO, M., Law of Evidence at the International Criminal Court: Blending Accusatorial and Inquisitorial Models, in «North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation», Vol. 36, 2011, pp. 287 – 318. CARCANO, A., The ICTY Appeals Chamber’s Nikolić Decision on Legality of Arrest: Can an International Criminal Court Assert Jurisdiction over Illegally Seized Offenders?, in «Italian Yearbook of International Law», Vol. 13, 2003, pp. 77 – 93. CASSESE, A., Is the ICC Still Having Teething Problems?, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 4, 2006, pp. 434 – 441. CASSESE, A., On the Current Trends towards Criminal Prosecution and Punishment of Breaches of International Humanitarian Law, in «European Journal of International Law», Vol. 9, 1998, pp. 2 – 17.

1053

CASSESE, A., The ICTY, a Living and Vital Reality, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 2, 2004, pp. 585 – 597. CERONE, C., The Special Court for Sierra Leone: Establishing a New Approach to International Criminal Justice, in «ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law», Vol. 8, 2001-2002, pp. 379 – 388. CHATZIVASSILIOU, D., The Guarantees of Judicial Control with Respect to Deprivation of Liberty under Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights, in «ERA Forum», Vol. 5, 2004, pp. 499 – 519. CLAUSSEN, K., Up to the Bar? Designing the Hybrid Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Cambodia, in «Yale Journal of International Law», Vol. 33, 2008, pp. 253 – 258. COGAN, J.K., International Criminal Courts and Fair Trials: Difficulties and Prospects, in «Yale Journal of International Law», Vol. 27, 2002, pp. 111 – 140. COHEN, D., Indifference and Accountability: The United Nations and the Politics of Justice in East-Timor, in «East-West Center Special Reports», Nr. 9, 2006, 135p. CÔTÉ, L., International Criminal Justice : Tightening Up the Rules of the Game, in «International Review of the Red Cross», Vol. 88, 2006, 133 – 144. CÔTÉ, L., Reflections on the Exercise of Prosecutorial Discretion in International Criminal Law, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 3, 2005, pp. 162 – 186. CRANE, D.M., White Man’s Justice: Applying International Justice After Regional Third World Conflicts, in «Cardozo Law Review», Vol. 27, 2005-2006, pp. 1683 – 1688. CRYER, R., A “Special Court” for Sierra Leone? , in «International and Comparative Law Quarterly», Vol. 50, 2001, pp. 435 – 446. CRYER, R., Witness Evidence before International Criminal Tribunals, in «The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals», Vol. 3, 2003, pp. 411 – 439. CURRIE, R.J., Abducted Fugitives before the International Criminal Court: Problems and Prospects, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 18, 2007, pp. 343 – 393. DAMAŠKA, M., Reflections on Fairness in International Criminal Justice, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 10, 2012, pp. 611 – 620. DAMAŠKA, M., The Competing Visions of Fairness: The Basic Choices for International Criminal Tribunals, in «North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation», Vol. 36, 2010 – 2011, pp. 365 – 388. DAMAŠKA, M., The International Criminal Court between Aspiration and Achievement, in «UCLA Journal of International Law & Foreign Affairs», Vol. 37, 2009, pp. 19 – 35.

1054

DAMAŠKA, M., The Uncertain Fate of Evidentiary Transplants: Anglo-American and Continental Experiments, in «The American Journal of Comparative Law», Vol. 45, 1997, pp. 839 – 852. DAMAŠKA, M., What is the Point of International Criminal Justice, in «Chicago-Kent Law Review», Vol. 83, 2008, pp. 329 – 365. DANNER, A.M., Enhancing the Legitimacy and Accountability of Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal Court, in «American Journal of International Law», Vol. 97, 2003, pp. 510 – 552. DANNER, A.M., Navigating Law and Politics: The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court and the Independent Counsel, in «Stanford Law Review», Vol. 55, 2003, pp. 1633 – 1665. DAVIDSON, C., May it Please the Court? The Role of Public Confidence, Public Order, and Public Opinion in Bail for International Criminal Defendants, in «Columbia Human Rights Law Review», Vol. 43, 2012, pp. 349 – 413. DAVIDSON, C.L., No Shortcuts on Human Rights: Bail and the International Criminal Trial, in «American University Law Review», Vol. 60, 2010, pp. 1-70. DAVIES, T.E., How the Rome Statute Weakens the International Prohibition on Incitement to Genocide, in «Harvard Human Rights Journal», Vol. 22, 2009, pp. 245 – 270. DE BUSSER, E., Examples and Assumptions: Transatlantic Data Protection in Criminal Matters, in «Journal of Internet Law», Vol. 15, 2012, pp. 3 – 18. DE HERT, P. and KORENICA, F., The Doctrine of Equivalent Protection: Its Life and Legitimacy Before and After the European Union’s Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights, in «German Law Journal», Vol. 13, 2012, pp. 874 – 895. DE VOS, C.M., Case Note, Prosecutor v. Lubanga, ‘Someone who Comes Between one Person and Another’: Lubanga, Local Cooperation and the Right to a Fair Trial, in «Melbourne Journal of International Law», Vol. 12, 2011, pp. 217 – 236. DE YCAZA, C., Victor’s Justice in War Crimes Tribunals: A Study of the International Criminal Tribunal in Rwanda, in «New York International Law Review», Vol. 23, 2010, pp. 53 - 81. DECAUX, E., The Place of Human Rights Courts and International Criminal Courts in the International System, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 9, 2011, pp. 597 – 608. DEFRANCIA, C., Due Process in International Criminal Courts, in «Virginia Law Review», Vol. 87, 2001, pp. 1381 – 1439. DEFRANK, M.M., Commentary: ICTY Provisional Release: Current Practice, a Dissenting Voice, and the Case for a Rule Change, in «Texas Law Review», Vol. 80, 2001 – 2002, pp. 1429 – 1463. 1055

DEGUZMAN, M.M., Choosing to Prosecute: Expressive Selection at the International Criminal Court, in «Michigan Journal of International Law», Vol. 33, 2012, pp. 265 – 320. DEGUZMAN, M.M., Gravity and the Legitimacy of the International Criminal Court, in «Fordham International Law Journal», Vol. 32, 2009, pp. 1400 – 1465. DEL PONTE, C., Investigation and Prosecution of Large-Scale Crimes at the International Level: the Experience of the ICTY, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 4, 2006, pp. 539 – 558. DELMAS-MARTY, M., Interactions between National and International Criminal Law in the Preliminary Phase of Trial at the ICC, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 4, 2006, pp. 2 – 11. DEMIRDJIAN, A., Armless Giants: Cooperation, State Responsibility and Suggestions for the ICC Review Conference, in «International Criminal Law Review», Vol. 10, 2010, pp. 181 – 208. DEPREZ, C., Extent of Applicability of Human Rights Standards to Proceedings before the International Criminal Court: On Possible Reductive Factors, in «International Criminal Law Review», Vol. 12, 2012, pp. 721 -741. DIXON, R., Developing International Rules of Evidence for the Yugoslav and Rwanda Tribunals, in «Transitional Law & Contemporary Problemsǽ, Vol. 7, 1997, pp. 81 – 102. DONG, J., Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal Court: A Comparative Study, in «Journal of Politics and Law», Vol. 2, 2009, pp. 109 -114. DORAN, K., Provisional Release in Human Rights Law and International Criminal Law, in «International Criminal Law Review», Vol. 11, 2011, pp. 707 – 743. DUBBER, M.D., Common Civility: The Culture of Alegality in International Criminal Law, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 24, 2011, pp. 923 – 936. EDWARDS, G.E., International Human Rights Law Challenges to the New International Criminal Court: The Search and Seizure Right to Privacy, in «The Yale Journal of International Law», Vol. 26, 2001, pp. 323 – 412. EL ZEIDY, M.M., Critical Thoughts on Article 59(2) of the ICC Statute, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 4, 2006, pp. 448 – 465. EL ZEIDY, M.M., Some Remarks on the Question of Admissibility of a Case During Arrest Warrant Proceedings before the International Criminal Court, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 19, 2006, pp. 741 – 751. FAIRLIE, M.A., Due Process Erosion: The Diminution of Live Testimony at the ICTY, in «California Western International Law Journal», Vol. 34, 2003, pp. 47 – 83.

1056

FAIRLIE, M.A., The Marriage of Common and Continental Law at the ICTY, in «International Criminal Law Review», Vol. 4, 2004, pp. 243 – 316. FAIRLIE, M.A., The Precedent of Pre-Trial Release at the ICTY: A Road Better Left less Travelled, in «Fordham International Law Journal», Vol. 33, 2009 – 2010, pp. 1101 – 1177. FEDOROVA, M. and SLUITER, G., Human Rights as Minimum Standards in International Criminal Proceedings, in «Human rights & International Legal Discourse», Vol. 3, 2009, pp. 9-56. FEICHTNER, I., Realizing Utopia through the Practice of International Law, in «European Journal of International Law», Vol. 23, 2012, pp. 1143 – 1147. FIELD, S. and WEST, A., Dialogue and the Inquisitorial Tradition: French Defence Lawyers in the Pre-Trial Criminal Law Process, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 14, 2003, pp. 261 – 316. FIELD, S., Fair Trials and Procedural Tradition in Europe, in «Oxford Journal of Legal Studies», Vol. 29, 2009, pp. 365 -387. FIGÀ-TALAMANCA, N., The Role of NATO in the Peace Agreement for Bosnia and Herzegovina, in «European Journal of International Law», Vol. 7, 1996, pp. 164 – 175. FINDLAY, M., Synthesis in Trial Procedures? The Experience of International Criminal Tribunals, in «International and Comparative Law Quarterly», Vol. 50, 2001, pp. 26 – 51. FRASE, S. and WEIGEND, T., German Criminal Justice as a Guide to American Law Reform: Similar Problems, Better Solutions?, in «Boston College International and Comparative Law Review», Vol. 18, 1995, pp. 317 – 360. FRIMAN, H., Inspiration from the International Criminal Tribunals when Developing Law on Evidence for the International Criminal Court, in «The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals», Vol. 2, 2003, pp. 373 – 400. FURUYA, S., Rule 61 Proceedings in the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, A Lesson for the ICC, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 12, 1999, pp. 635 – 669. GAETA, P., Does President Al Bashir Enjoy Immunity from Arrest?, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 7, 2009, pp. 315 – 332. GAETA, P., Is NATO Authorized or Obliged to Arrest Persons Indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia?, in «European Journal of International Law», Vol. 9, 1998, pp. 174 – 181. GAETA, P., Is the Practice of ‘Self-Referrals’ a Sound Start for the ICC?, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 2, 2004, pp. 949 – 952. GALBRAITH, J., The Pace of International Criminal Justice, in «Michigan Journal of International Law», Vol. 31, 2009, pp. 79 – 143. 1057

GALLANT, K.S., Securing the Presence of Defendants before the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: Breaking with Extradition, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 5, 1994, pp. 557 – 588. GAMARRA, Y. and VICENTE, A., United Nations Member States’ Obligations Towards the ICTY: Arresting and Transferring Lukic, Gotovina and Zelenovic, in «International Criminal Law Review», Vol. 8, 2008, pp. 627 – 653. GILLETT, M. and SCHUSTER, M., The Special Tribunal for Lebanon Swiftly Adopts its Rules of Procedure and Evidence, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 7, 2009, pp. 885 -909. GODINHO, J.A.F., The Surrender Agreements between the US and the ICTY and ICTR: A Critical View, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 1, 2003, pp. 502 – 516. GOLDSTON, R., More Candour about Criteria: The Exercise of Discretion by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 8, 2010, pp. 383 – 406. GOLDSTONE, R., A View from the Prosecution, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 2, 2004, pp. 380 – 384. GOLDSTONE, R., Prosecuting Rape as a War Crime, in «Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law», Vol. 34, 2002, pp. 277 – 285. GOLDSTONE, R.J. and FRITZ, N., ‘In the Interests of Justice’ and Independent Referral: The ICC Prosecutor’s Unprecedented Powers, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 13, 2000, pp. 655 -667. GRADONI, L., International Criminal Courts and Tribunals: Bound by Human Rights Norms…or Tied Down?, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 19, 2006, pp. 847 873. GRANDE, E., Dances of Justice: Tango and Rumba in Comparative Criminal Procedure, in «International Commentary on Evidence», Vol. 9/4, 2009, 20p. GRANDISON, C., Update from the International and Internationalized Criminal Tribunals, in «Human Rights Brief», Vol. 19, 2012, pp. 49 – 50. GREEN, B.A. and ZACHARIAS, F.C., Prosecutorial Neutrality, in «Wisconsin Law Review», 2004, pp. 837 – 904. GREENAWALT, A.K.A., Justice Without Politics? Prosecutorial Discretion and the International Criminal Court, in «NYU Journal of International Law & Politics», Vol. 39, 2007, pp. 583 – 673. GROOME, D.M., Re-Evaluating the Theoretical Basis and Methodology of International Criminal Trials, in «Pennsylvania State International Law Review», Vol. 25, 2007, pp. 791 – 802. 1058

GUGGISBERG, S., The Nada Case before the ECtHR: A New Milestone in the European Debate on Security Council Targeted Sanctions, in «Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy», Vol. 8, 2012, pp. 411 – 435. HAFNER, G. and BINDER, C., The Interpretation of Article 21 (3) ICC Statute: Opinion Reviewed, in «Austrian Review of International and European Law», Vol. 9, 2004, pp. 163 – 190. HANSEN, T.O., A Critical Review of the ICC's Recent Practice Concerning Admissibility Challenges and Complementarity, in «Melbourne Journal of International Law», Vol. 13, 2012, pp. 217 – 234. HARMON, M.B. and GAYNOR, F., Prosecuting Massive Crimes with Primitive Tools: Three Difficulties Encountered by Prosecutors in International Criminal Proceedings, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 2, 2004, pp. 403 – 426. HARRIS, K.J. and KUSHEN, R., Surrender of Fugitives to the War Crimes Tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda: Squaring International Legal Obligations with the U.S. Constitution, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 7, 1996, pp. 561 -604. HASKELL, L. and WALDORF, L., The Impunity Gap of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda: Causes and Consequences, in «Hastings International and Comparative Law Review», Vol. 34, 2011, pp. 49 – 85. HENZELIN, M., HEISKANEN, V. and METTRAUX, G., Reparations to Victims before the International Criminal Court: Lessons from International Mass Claims Processes, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 17, 2005, pp. 281 – 344. HOFFMEISTER, F., Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi (Bosphorus Airways) v. Ireland in «American Journal of International Law», Vol. 100, 2006, pp. 442 – 449. HORTON, L.F., Prosecutorial Discretion Before International Criminal Courts and Perceptions of Justice: How Expanded Prosecutorial Independence Can Increase the Accountability of International Actors, in «Eyes on the ICC», Vol. 7, 2010-2011, pp. 5 - 57. JACKSON, J. and M’BOGE, Y., Integrating a Socio-Legal Approach to Evidence in the International Criminal Tribunals, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 26, 2013, pp. 933 – 935. JACKSON, J. and M’BOGE, Y., The effect of Legal Culture on the Development of International Evidentiary Practice: From the “Robing Room” to the “Melting Pot”, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 26, 2013, pp. 947 – 970. JACKSON, J., Finding the Best Epistemic Fit for International Criminal Tribunals, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 7, 2009, pp. 17 – 39. JACKSON, J., Re-Conceptualizing the Right of Silence as an Effective Fair Trial Standard, in «International and Comparative Law Quarterly», Vol. 58, 2009, pp. 835 - 861. 1059

JACKSON, J., The Ethical Implications of the Enhanced Role of the Public Prosecutor, in «Legal Ethics», Vol. 9, 2006, pp. 35 – 55. JAIN, N., Between the Scylla and Charybdis of Prosecution and Reconciliation: the Khmer Rouge Trials and the Promise of International Criminal Justice, in «Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law», Vol. 20, 2010, p. 247 – 290. JAIN, N., Conceptualising Internationalisation in Hybrid Criminal Courts, in «Singapore Year Book of International Law », Vol. 12, 2008, pp. 86 -96. JALLOH, C.C., Special Court for Sierra Leone: Achieving Justice?, in «Michigan Journal of International Law», Vol. 32, 2011, pp. 395 – 460. JALLOH, C.C., Prosecuting those Bearing “Greatest Responsibility”: The Lessons of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, in «Marquette Law Review», Vol. 96, 2013, pp. 863 – 911. JALLOW, H.B., Prosecutorial Discretion and International Criminal Justice, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 3, 2005, pp. 145 – 161. JOHNSON, L.D., Ten Years Later: Reflections on the Drafting, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 2, 2004, pp. 368 – 379. JONES, J.R.W.D., CARLTON-HANCILES, C., KAH-JALLOW, H. and YILLAH, I., The Special Court for Sierra Leone: a Defence Perspective, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 2, 2004, pp. 211 – 230. JONES, J.R.W.D., The Implications of the Peace Agreement for the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, in «European Journal of International Law», Vol. 7, 1996, pp. 226 – 244. JOYCE, D., The Historical Function of International Criminal Trials, in «Nordic Journal of International Law», Vol. 73, 2004, pp. 461-484. KAREMAKER, R., DON TAYLOR III, B. and PITTMAN, T.W., Witness Proofing in International Criminal Tribunals, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 21, 2008, pp. 917 – 923. KATZENSTEIN, S., Hybrid Tribunals: Searching for Justice in East Timor, in «Harvard Human Rights Journal», Vol. 16, 2003, pp. 245 – 278. KATZMAN, R., The Non-Disclosure of Confidential Exculpatory Evidence and the Lubanga Proceedings: How the ICC Defense System Affects the Accused’s Right to a Fair Trial, in «Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights», Vol. 8, 2009, pp. 77 – 101. KAUL, H.-P. and KRESS, C., Jurisdiction and Cooperation in the Statute of the International Criminal Court: Principles and Compromises, in «Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law», Vol. 2, 1999, pp. 143 – 175.

1060

KAY, S., The Move from Oral Evidence to Written Evidence, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 2, 2004, pp. 495 – 502. KEEN, P.C., Tempered Adversariality: The Judicial Role and Trial Theory in the International Criminal Tribunals, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 17, 2004, pp. 767 – 814. KERR, K., Fair Trials at International Tribunals, Examining the Parameters of the International Right to Counsel, in «Georgetown Journal of International Law», Vol. 36, 2005, pp. 1227-1254. KLAMBERG, M., What are the Objectives of International Criminal Procedure? – Reflections on the Fragmentation of a Legal Regime, in «Nordic Journal of International Law», Vol. 79, 2010, pp. 279 – 302. KLIP, A.H., The Decrease of Protection under Human Rights Treaties in International Criminal Law, in «International Review of Penal Law», Vol. 68, 1997, pp. 291-310. KNOOPS, G.-J., The Duality of State Cooperation Within International and National Criminal Cases, in «Fordham International Law Journal», Vol. 30, 2007, pp. 260 – 295. KNOOPS, G.-J.A., Challenging the Legitimacy of Initiating Contemporary International Criminal Proceedings: Rethinking Prosecutorial Discretionary Powers from a Legal, Ethical and Political Perspective, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 15, 2005, pp. 365 – 390. KNOWLES, P., The Power to Prosecute: the Special Court for Sierra Leone from a Defence Perspective, in «International Criminal Law Review», Vol. 6, 2006, pp. 387 - 417. KODAMA, Y., For Judicial Justice and Reconciliation in Cambodia: Reflections upon the Establishment of the Khmer Rouge Trials and the Trials’ Procedural Rules, in «The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals», Vol. 9, 2010, pp. 37 – 113. KOLLER, D.S., The Faith of the International Criminal Lawyer, in «International Law and Politics», Vol. 40, 2008, pp. 1019 – 1069. KRESS, C., ‘Self-Referrals’ and ‘Waivers of Complementarity’: Some Considerations in Law and Policy, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 2, 2004, pp. 944 - 948. KRESS, C., The Procedural Law of the International Criminal Court in Outline: Anatomy of a Unique Compromise, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 1, 2003, pp. 603 – 617. KUSHEN, R. and HARRIS, K.J., Surrender of Fugitives by the United States to the War Crimes Tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda, in «The American Journal of International Law», Vol. 90, 1996, pp. 510 – 518. KUSHEN, R., The Surrender Agreements between the US and the ICTY and ICTR: The American View, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 1, 2003, pp. 517 – 519.

1061

LA ROSA, A.-M., A Tremendous Challenge for the International Criminal Tribunals: Reconciling the Requirements of International Humanitarian Law with those of Fair Trial, in «International Review of the Red Cross», No. 321, 1997, pp. 635 - 650. LAMB, S., The Powers of Arrest of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, in «The British Yearbook of International Law», Vol. 70, 2000, pp. 165 – 244. LANGER, M. and DOHERTY, J.W., Managerial Judging Goes International, but its Promise Remains Unfulfilled: An Empirical Assessment of the ICTY Reforms, in «Yale Journal of International Law», Vol. 36, 2011, pp. 241 – 305. LANGER, M., The Rise of Managerial Judging in International Criminal Law, in «American Journal of Comparative Law», Vol. 53, 2005, pp. 835 - 909. LEPARD, B.D., How Should the ICC Prosecutor Exercise his or her Discretion? The Role of Fundamental Ethical Principles, in «John Marshall Law Review», Vol. 43, 2010, pp. 553 – 567. LINTON, S. and REIGER, C., The Evolving Jurisprudence and Practice of East Timor’s Special Panels for Serious Crimes on Admissions of Guilt, Duress and Superior Orders, in «Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law», Vol. 4, 2001, pp. 167 – 212. LINTON, S., Cambodia, East Timor and Sierra Leone: Experiments in International Criminal Justice, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 12, 2001, pp. 185 – 246. LINTON, S., Prosecuting Atrocities at the District Court of Dili, in «Melbourne Journal of International Law», Vol. 2, 2001, pp. 414 – 458. LINTON, S., Rising from the Ashes: The Creation of a viable Criminal Justice System in East Timor, in «Melbourne University Law Review», Vol. 25, 2001, pp. 122 – 180. LITTLE, R.K., Proportionality as an Ethical Precept for Prosecutors in their Investigative Role, in «Fordham Law Review», Vol. 68, 1999, pp. 723 – 770. LUZZATI, S., On the Admissibility of Statements Made by the Defendant Prior to Trial: Remarks on the ICTY Appeals Chamber’s Decisions in Halilović and Prlić et al., in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 8, 2010, pp. 221 – 236. MA, Y., Prosecutorial Discretion and Plea Bargaining in the United States, France. Germany and Italy: A Comparative Perspective, in «International Criminal Justice Review», Vol. 12, pp. 22 – 52. MAGUIRE, M. and JOHN, T., Covert and Exceptive Policing in England and Wales : Issues of Regulation and Practice, in «European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice», Vol. 4, 1996, pp. 316 – 334. MAHONEY, P., Right to a Fair Trial in Criminal Matters under Article 6 E.C.H.R., in «Judicial Studies Institute Journal», Vol. 4, 2004, pp. 107 – 129.

1062

MALLESONS, S.J., The OTP v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo: The Challenges of Using “Intermediaries” in the International Criminal Court, in «Humanitarian Law Perspectives», http://www.redcross.org.au/files/2011_2011, 19p (available at: _the_otp_v_thomas_lubanga_dyilo__the_challenge_of_using__intermediaries__in_the_intern ational_criminal_court.pdf, last visited 30 August 2013). MAOGOTO, J. N., A Giant Without Limbs: The International Criminal Court’s State-Centric Cooperation Regime, in «University of Queensland Law Journal», Vol. 102, 2004, pp. 102 133. MARKOVIC, M., The ICC Prosecutor’s Missing Code of Conduct, in «Texas International Law Journal», Vol. 47, 2011 – 2012, pp. 201 – 236. MARSHALL, A., Prevention and Complementarity in the International Criminal Court: A Positive Approach, in «Human Rights Brief», Vol. 17, 2010, pp. 21 – 26. MAY, L., Habeas Corpus and the Normative Jurisprudence of International Law, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 23, 2010, pp. 291 – 310. MCAULIFFE, P., The Limits of Co-operation and Judicial Independence: Resolving the Question of How Long do you Go: The Khmer Rouge Trials’ Bicephalous Prosecution, in «University of Tasmania Law Review», Vol. 29, 2010, pp. 111- 141. MCCLELLAND, G.A., A Non-Adversary Approach to International Criminal Tribunals, in «Suffolk Transnational Law Review», Vol. 26, 2002, pp. 5 – 38. MCDERMOTT, Y., The Admissibility and Weight of Written Witness Testimony in International Criminal Law: A Socio-Legal Analysis, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 26, 2013, pp. 971 – 989. MCINTYRE, G., Equality of Arms – Defining Human Rights in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 16, 2003, pp. 269 – 320. MÉGRET, F., Beyond “Fairness”: Understanding the Determinants of International Criminal Procedure, in «UCLA Journal of International Law & Foreign Affairs», Vol. 37, 2009, pp. 37 – 76. MÉGRET, F., The Legacy of the ICTY as Seen Through Some of its Actors and Observers, in «Goettingen Journal of International Law», Vol. 3, 2011, pp. 1011 – 1052. MEIJERS, I.G.M., Over Lüdi tegen Zwitserland, EHRM 15 juni 1992, in «Delikt and Delinkwent» 1994, pp. 272 – 277. METTRAUX, G., The Internationalization of Domestic Jurisdictions by International Tribunals: The Special Tribunal for Lebanon Renders its First Decisions, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 7, 2009, pp. 911 – 926. MICHELS, J.D., Compensating Acquitted Defendants before International Criminal Courts, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 8, 2010, pp. 407 – 424. 1063

MILANOVIĆ, M., State Responsibility for Genocide: A Follow-up, in «European Journal of International Law», Vol. 18, pp. 669- 694. MIRAGLIA, M., Admissibility of Evidence, Standard of Proof, and Nature of the Decision in the ICC Confirmation of Charges in Lubanga, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 6, 2008, pp. 489 – 503. MIRAGLIA, M., The First Decision of the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber: International Criminal Procedure under Construction, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 4, 2006, pp. 188 – 195. MIRALDI, M., Overcoming Obstacles of Justice: The Special Court of Sierra Leone, in «New York Law School Journal of Human Rights», 2003, pp. 849 – 858. MOHAN, M., Schisms in Humanitarianism, - The Khmer Rouge Tribunal’s First Hearing, in «Asian Journal of Comparative Law», Vol. 4, 2009, pp. 1 – 29. MOMENI, M., Why Barayagwiza is Boycotting his Trial at the ICTR: Lessons in Balancing Due Process Rights and Politics, in «ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law», Vol. 7, 2000 – 2001, pp. 315 – 328. MORANCHEK, L., Protecting National Security Evidence while Prosecuting War Crimes: Problems and Lessons for International Justice from the ICTY, in «Yale Journal of International Law», Vol. 31, 2006, pp. 477 – 501. MORRISON, S., Extraordinary Language in the Courts of Cambodia: Interpreting the Limiting Language and Personal Jurisdiction of the Cambodian Tribunal, in «Capital University Law Review», Vol. 37, 2009, pp. 583 – 617. MÜLLER, C.A., The Law of Interim Release in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunals, in «International Criminal Law Review», Vol. 8, 2008, pp. 589 - 626. MUNDIS, D.A., From ‘Common Law’ Towards ‘Civil Law’: The Evolution of the ICTY Rules of Procedure and Evidence, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 14, 2001, pp. 367 – 382. MUNDIS, D.A., The Judicial Effects of the “Completion Strategies” on the Ad Hoc International Criminal Tribunals, in «American Journal of International Law», Vol. 99, 2005, pp. 142 – 158. MURPHY, R., Gravity Issues and the International Criminal Court, in « Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 33, 2006, pp. 281 – 315. NAYMARK, D., Violations of Rights of the Accused at International Criminal Tribunals: The Problem of Remedy, in «Journal of International Law and International Relations», Vol. 4, 2008, pp. 1 – 18.

1064

NEUNER, M., The Security Council and the ICC: Assessing the first ten Years of Coexistence, in «New England Journal of International and Comparative Law», Vol. 18, 2012, pp. 283 – 310. NGANE, S.N., Witnesses before the International Criminal Court, in «The International Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals», Vol. 8, 2009, pp. 431 – 457. NSEREKO, D.D.N., Prosecutorial Discretion before National Courts and International Tribunals, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 3, 2005, pp. 124 – 144. NTANDA NSEREKO, D.D., Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 5, 1994, pp. 507 – 555. NYAMUYA MAOGOTO, J., A Giant Without Limbs: The International Criminal Court’s State-Centric Cooperation Regime, in «The University of Queensland Law Journal», Vol. 23, 2004, pp. 102 – 133. O’SULLIVAN, E. and MONTGOMERY, D., The Erosion of the Right to Confrontation under the Cloak of Fairness at the ICTY, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 8, 2010, pp. 511 – 538. OHLIN, J. D., A Meta-Theory of International Criminal Procedure, Vindicating the Rule of Law, in «UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs», Vol. 14, 2009, pp. 77 – 120. OLÁSOLO, H., The Prosecutor of the ICC before the Initiation of Investigations, in «International Criminal Law Review», Vol. 3, 2003, pp. 87 – 150. OOSTERVELD, M., PERRY, M. and MCMANUS, J., The Cooperation of States with the International Criminal Court, in «Fordham International Law Journal», Vol. 25, 2001 – 2002, pp. 767 – 839. PACKER, H.L., Two Models of the Criminal Process, in «University of Pennsylvania Law Review», Vol. 113, 1964, pp. 1 - 68. PAPILLON, S., Has the United Nations Security Council Implicitly Removed Al Bashir’s Immunity?, in «International Criminal Law Review», Vol. 10, 2010, pp. 175 – 288. PAUST, J.J., The Freeing of Ntakirutimana in the United States and ‘Extradition’ to the ICTR’ in «Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law», Vol. 1, 1998, pp. 205 – 209. PETERS, A., Realizing Utopia as a Scholarly Undertaking, in «American Journal of International Law», Vol. 24, 2013, pp. 533 – 552. PETIT, R. and AHMED, A., A Review of the Jurisprudence of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal, in «Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights», Vol. 8, 2010, pp. 155 – 189. PHELPS, J., Reflections on Bosphorus and Human Rights in Europe, in «Tulane Law Review», Vol. 81, 2006, pp. 252 – 279.

1065

PHILIPS, N.L. and SMITH, S., Reinterpreting the Ethical Duties of a Prosecutor: Y-STR as a Model Investigative Tool in «The Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics», Vol. 22, 2009, pp. 1073 – 1093. PIZZI, W., Overcoming Logistical and Structural Barriers to Fair Trials at International Tribunals, in «International Commentary on Evidence», Vol. 4/1, 2006, 5p. PRADEL, J., De l’enquête pénale proactive: Suggestions pour un statut légal, in «Recueil Dalloz», 1998, pp. 57 – 60. RASTAN, R., Comment on Victor’s Justice & the Viability of Ex ante Standards, in «John Marshall Law Review», Vol. 43, 2010, pp. 569 – 602. RASTAN, R., Testing Co-operation: The International Criminal Court and National Authorities, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 21, 2008, pp. 431 – 456. RASTAN, R., The Jurisdictional Scope of Situations before the International Criminal Court, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 23, 2012, pp. 1 – 24. RASTAN, R., What is a ‘Case’ for the Purpose of the Rome Statute?, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 19, 2008, pp. 435 - 448. RATNER, S. and SLAUGHTER, A.-M., Appraising the Methods of International Law: A Prospectus for Readers, in «American Journal of International Law», Vol. 93, 1999, pp. 291 – 302. REARICK, D.J., Innocent Until Alleged Guilty, Provisional Release at the ICTR, in «Harvard International Law Journal», Vol. 44, 2003, pp. 577 – 595. REYDAMS, L., The ICTR ten Years on: Back to the Nuremberg Paradigm?, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 3, 2005, pp. 977 – 988. ROBERTS, P., Comparative Criminal Justice Goes Global, in «Oxford Journal of Legal Studies», Vol. 28, 2008, pp. 369 – 391. ROBINSON, D., Serving the Interests of Justice: Amnesties, Truth Commissions and the International Criminal Court, in «European Journal of International Law», Vol. 14, 2003, pp. 481 – 505. ROBINSON, D., The Mysterious Mysteriousness of Complementarity, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 21, 2010, pp. 67 - 102. ROBINSON, P.L., Ensuring Fair and Expeditious Trials at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, in «European Journal of European Law», Vol. 11, 2000, pp. 569 – 589. ROBINSON, P.L., Rough Edges in the Alignment of Legal Systems in the Proceedings at the ICTY, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 3, 2005, pp. 1037 - 1058.

1066

ROSS, J.E., The Place of Covert Surveillance in Democratic Societies: a Comparative Study of the United States and Germany, in «American Journal of Comparative Law», Vol. 55, 2007, pp. 493 – 579. ROTH, R. and TULKENS, F., Symposium, The Influence of the European Court of Human Rights’ Case Law on (International) Criminal Law: Introduction, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 9, 2011, pp. 571 – 575. RUSELL-BROWN, S.L., Poisoned Chalice?: The Rights of Criminal Defendants Under International Law, During the Pre-Trial Phase, in «UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs», Vol. 8, 2003, pp. 127 – 164. RYNGAERT, C., The Doctrine of Abuse of Process: A Comment on the Cambodia Tribunal’s Decisions in the Case against Duch (2007), in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 21, 2008, pp. 719 – 737. RYNGAERT, C., The European Court of Human Rights’ Approach to the Responsibility of Member States in Connection with Acts of International Organizations, in «International & Comparative Law Quarterly», Vol. 60, 2011, pp. 997 – 1016. SADAT, L.N., Custom, Codification and some Thoughts About the Relationship Between the Two: Article 10 of the ICC Statute, in «DePaul Law Review», Vol. 49, 1999 – 2000, pp. 909 – 924. SAFFERLING, C., The Rights and Interests of the Defence in the Pre-Trial Phase, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 9, 2011, pp. 651 – 667. SAUNDERS, K.W., The Mythic Difficulty in Proving a Negative, in «Seton Hall Law Review», Vol. 15, 1984 -1985, pp. 276 – 289. SCHABAS, W., Barayagwiza v. Prosecutor in «The American Journal of International Law», Vol. 94, 2000, pp. 563 – 571. SCHABAS, W.A., Common Law, «Civil Law», et droit pénal international: tango (le dernier?) à La Haye, in «Revue québécoise de droit international» Vol. 13, 2000, pp. 287 – 307. SCHABAS, W.A., Complementarity in Practice: Some Uncomplimentary Thoughts, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 19, 2007, pp. 5 – 33. SCHABAS, W.A., Prosecutorial Discretion v. Judicial Activism at the ICC, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 6, 2008, pp. 731 – 761. SCHABAS, W.A., Sentencing by International Tribunals: A Human Rights Approach, in «Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law», Vol. 7, 1997, pp. 461 - 517. SCHABAS, W.A., Synergy or Fragmentation, International Criminal Law and the European Convention on Human Rights, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 9, 2011, pp. 609 – 632.

1067

SCHABAS, W.A., Victor’s Justice: Selecting “Situations” at the International Criminal Court, in «John Marshall Law Review», Vol. 43, 2010, pp. 535 – 552. SCHARF, M.P., The Prosecutor v. Slavko Dokmanović: Irregular Rendition and the ICTY, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 11, 1998, pp. 369 – 382. SCHARF, M.P., The Tools for Enforcing International Criminal Justice in the New Millennium: Lessons from the Yugoslavia Tribunal, in «DePaul Law Review», Vol. 49, 2000, pp. 925 – 979. SCHEURMANS, F., Impliciete dwangbevoegdheden bij de uitvoering van de huiszoeking, in «Tijdschrift voor Strafrecht», 2011-12, pp. 106 – 115. SCHOMBURG, W., The Role of International Criminal Tribunals in Promoting Respect for Fair Trials, in «Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights», Vol. 8, 2009, pp. 1- 29. SCHRAG, M., Lessons Learned from ICTY Experience, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 2, 2004, pp. 427 – 434. SCHRAG, M., The Yugoslav Crimes Tribunal: A Prosecutor’s View, in «Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law», Vol. 6, 1995-1996, pp. 187 – 195. SCHWARZENBERGER, G., The Problem of an International Criminal Law, in «Current Legal Problems », Vol. 3, 1950, pp. 263 – 296. SCHWARZENBERGER, G., The Province of International Judicial Law, in «Notre Dame International Law Journal», Vol. 21, 1983, pp. 21-32. SHAFFER, G. and GINSBURG, T., The Empirical Turn in International Legal Scholarship, in «American Journal of International Law», Vol. 106, 2012, pp. 1 – 46. SHAHABUDDEEN, M., Teething Phase of the ECCC, in «Chinese Journal of International Law», Vol. 10, 2011, pp. 469 – 502. SHANY, Y., Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: A Goal-Based Approach, in «American Journal of International Law», Vol. 106, 2012, pp. 225 – 270. SHEPPARD, D., The International Criminal Court and “Internationally Recognized Human Rights”: Understanding Article 21 (3) of the Rome Statute, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 10, 2010, pp. 43 – 71. SHERMAN, A., Sympathy for the Devil: Examining a Defendant’s Right to Confront Before the International War Crimes Tribunal, in «Emory International Law Review», Vol. 10, 1996, pp. 833 – 878. SIMMA, B. and PAULUS, A.L., The Responsibility of Individuals for Human Rights Abuses in Internal Conflicts: A Positivist View, in «American Journal of International Law», Vol. 93, 1999, pp. 302 – 317.

1068

SKILBECK, R., Frankenstein’s Monster: Creating a New International Procedure, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 8, 2010, pp. 451 – 462. SLOAN, J., Prosecutor v. Dragan Nikolić: Decision on Defence Motion on Illegal Capture, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 16, 2003, pp. 541 – 552. SLOAN, J., Prosecutor v. Todorović: Illegal Capture as an Obstacle to the Exercise of International Criminal Jurisdiction, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 16, 2003, pp. 85 – 113. SLOBOGIN, S., An Empirically Based Comparison of American and European Regulatory Approaches to Police Investigation, in «Michigan Journal of International Law», Vol. 22, 2001, pp. 423 – 456. SLUITER, G., “I Beg You, Please Come Testify” – The Problematic Absence of Subpoena Powers at the ICC, in «New Criminal Law Review», Vol. 12, 2009, pp. 590 – 608. SLUITER, G., Atrocity Crimes Litigation: Some Human Rights Concerns Occasioned by Selected 2009 Case Law, in «Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights», Vol. 8, 2010, pp. 248 – 268. SLUITER, G., Due Process and Criminal Procedure in the Cambodian Extraordinary Chambers, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 4, 2006, pp. 314 – 326. SLUITER, G., International Criminal Proceedings and the Protection of Human Rights, in «New England Law Review», Vol. 37, 2002 – 2003, pp. 935 – 948. SLUITER, G., Obtaining Cooperation from Sudan – Where is the Law?, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 6, 2008, pp. 871 – 884. SLUITER, G., Recht op aanwezigheid van raadsman tijdens politieverhoor absoluut vereiste voor toelating bewijs, noot, in «NJCM-Bulletin», Vol. 23, 1998, pp. 86-87. SLUITER, G., Surrender of War Criminals to the ICC, in «The Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review», Vol. 25, 2003, pp. 605 – 652. SLUITER, G., The Law of International Criminal Procedure and Domestic War Crimes Trials, in «International Criminal Law Review», Vol. 6, 2006, pp. 605 – 635. SLUITER, G., The Surrender of Ntakirutimana Revisited, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 13, 2000, pp. 459 – 466. SLUITER, G., To Cooperate or not to Cooperate?: The Case of the Failed Transfer of Ntakirutimana to the Rwanda Tribunal, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 11, 2008, pp. 383 – 395. SRIDHAR, A., Note: The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’s Response to the Problem of Transnational Abduction, in «Stanford Journal of International Law», Vol. 42, 2006, pp. 343 – 364.

1069

STAHN, C., Between ‘Faith’ and ‘Facts’: By what Standards Should we Assess International Criminal Justice?, in «Leiden Journal of International Law», Vol. 25, 2012, pp. 251 -282. STAHN, C., Complementarity: A Tale of Two Notions, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 19, 2008, pp. 87 – 113. STAHN, C., The Ambiguities of Security Council Resolution 1422, in «European Journal of International Law», Vol. 14, 2003, pp. 85-104. STARR, S.B., Rethinking “Effective Remedies”: Remedial Deterrence in International Courts, in «New York University Law Review», Vol. 83, 2008, pp. 693 – 768. STARYGIN, S., ECCC in Pre-Trial Action: Was there Good Reason to Order Pre-Trial Detention of the ECCC Defendants, in «Human Rights in the Post-Conflict Context», Vol. 9, 2011, pp. 9 – 14. STARYGIN, S., Judicial Discretion in ECCC Decisions on Pre-Trial Detention against the Backdrop of the Case-law of the International Criminal Tribunals, in «International Criminal Law Review», Vol. 11, 2011, pp. 315 – 358. STEPHEN, C., International Criminal Law: Wielding the Sword of Universal Criminal Justice, in «International Criminal Law Quarterly», Vol. 61, 2012 , pp. 55 – 89. SUNGA, L.S., How can UN Human Rights Special Procedures Sharpen ICC Fact-Finding?, in «The International Journal of Human Rights», Vol. 15, 2011, pp. 187 – 205. SWART, B., Cooperation Challenges for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 5, 2007, pp. 1153 – 1163. SWOBODA, S., The ICC Disclosure Regime – A Defence Perspective, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 19, 2008, pp. 449 – 472. SZNAJDER, R., Provisional Release at the ICTY: Rights of the Accused and the Debate that Amended a Rule, in «Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights», Vol. 11, 2013, pp. 109 – 145. TAKEMURA, H. Big Fish and Small Fish Debate – An Examination of the Prosecutorial Discretion, in «International Criminal Law Review», Vol. 7, 2007, pp. 677 – 685. TAKEMURA, H., Reconsidering the Meaning and Actuality of the Legitimacy of the International Criminal Court, in «Amsterdam Law Forum», Vol. 4, 2012, pp. 3 -15. TOCHILOVSKY, V., International Criminal Justice: “Strangers in the Foreign System”, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 15, 2004, pp. 319 – 344. TOCHILOVSKY, V., Special Commentary: International Criminal Justice: Some Flaws and Misperceptions, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 22, 2011, pp. 593 – 607.

1070

TOCHILOVSKY, V., Trial in International Criminal Jurisdictions: Battle or Scrutiny?, in «European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice», Vol. 6/1, 1998, pp. 55 – 59. TROTTER, A., Pre-Conviction Detention in International Criminal Trials, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 11, 2013, pp. 351 – 377. TULKENS, F., The paradoxical Relationship between Criminal Law and Human Rights, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 9, 2011, pp. 577 – 595. TURNER, J.I., Defense Perspectives on Law and Politics in International Criminal Trials, in «Virginia Journal of International Law», Vol. 48, 2008, pp. 529 – 594. TURNER, J.I., Commentary: Decision on Civil Party Participation in Provisional Detention Appeals, in «American Journal of International Law», Vol. 103, 2009, pp. 121- 122. TURNER, J.I., Policing International Prosecutors, in «International Law and Politics», Vol. 45, 2013, pp. 175 – 258. ÜLGEN, Ö., The ICTY and Irregular Rendition of Suspects, in «The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals», Vol. 3, pp. 441 – 466. V. RÖBEN, The Procedure of the ICC: Status and Function of the Prosecutor, in «Max Planck United Nations Yearbook», Vol. 7, 2003, pp. 513 – 548. VAN DER WILT, H., Boekbespreking (bespreking van: H. Olásolo, The Role of the International Criminal Court in Preventing Atrocity Crimes Through Timely Intervention: From the Humanitarian Intervention Doctrine and Ex Post Facto Judicial Institutions to the Notion of Responsibility to Protect and the Preventative Role of the International Criminal Court (Oratie Utrecht)), in «Delikt en Delinkwent», 2011, pp. 1158 - 1164. VAN DER WILT, H., Het Joegoslavië Tribunaal en het beginsel male captus, bene judicatus, in «Delikt & Delinkwent», Vol. 18, 2004, pp. 274 – 285. VANGEEBERGEN, B. and VAN DAELE, D., De uitholling van de proactieve recherche, in «Nullum Crimen», Vol. 3, 2008, pp. 327 – 342. VASILIEV, S., Proofing the Ban on ‘Witness Proofing’: Did the ICC get it right?, in «Criminal Law Forum», Vol. 20, 2009, pp. 193 – 261. VENTURA, M.J., The ‘Reasonable Basis to Proceed’ Threshold in the Kenya and Côte d’Ivoire Proprio Motu Investigation Decisions: The International Criminal Court’s Lowest Evidentiary Standard?, in «The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals», Vol. 12, 2013, pp. 49 – 80. VERHOEVEN, J., Article 21 of the Rome Statute and the Ambiguities of Applicable Law in «Netherlands Yearbook of International Law», Vol. 33, 2002, pp. 3 – 22. VERVAELE, J.A.E., Mesures de procédure spéciales et respect des droits de l’homme – Rapport général, in «Utrecht Law Review», Vol. 5, 2009, pp. 110 – 152. 1071

VERVAELE, J.A.E., Special Procedural Measures and the Protection of Human Rights, in «Utrecht Law Review», Vol. 5, 2009, pp. 66 – 103. WADE, M.L., United Kingdom: England and Wales, in «Revue internationale de droit pénal», Vol. 80, 2009, pp. 323 – 339. WALD, P., Dealing with Witnesses in War Crimes Trials, in «Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal», Vol. 5, 2002, pp. 171 – 184. WALD, P., To ‘‘Establish Incredible Events by Credible Evidence’’: The Use of Affidavit Testimony in Yugoslavia War Crimes Tribunal Proceedings, in «Harvard International Law Journal», Vol. 42, 2001, pp. 535 – 553. WALDORF, L., “A mere Pretense of Justice”: Complementarity, Sham Trials, and Victor’s Justice at the Rwanda Tribunal, in «Fordham International Law Journal», Vol. 33, 2010, pp. 1221 – 1277. WARBRICK, C., International Criminal Courts and Fair Trial, in «Journal of Conflict and Security Law», Vol. 3, 1998, pp. 45 – 64. WEBB, P., The ICC Prosecutor’s Discretion not to Proceed in the “Interests of Justice”, in «Criminal Law Quarterly», Vol. 50, 2005, pp. 305 – 348. WEISBORD, N. and SMITH, M.A., The Reason Behind the Rules: From Description to Normativity in International Criminal Procedure, in «North-Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation», Vol. 36, 2010 - 2011, pp. 255 – 276. WHITING, A., In International Criminal Prosecutions, Justice Delayed Can Be Justice Delivered, in «Harvard International Law Journal», Vol. 50, 2009, pp. 323 – 364. WILLIAMS, S. and SHERIF, L., The Arrest Warrant for President al-Bashir: Immunities of Incumbent Heads of State and the International Criminal Court, in «Journal of Conflict & Security Law», Vol. 14, 2009, pp. 71 – 92. WILSON, R.A., Judging History: The Historical Record of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia , in «Human Rights Quarterly», Vol. 27, 2005, pp. 908 – 942. WOUTERS, J., VERHOEVEN, S. and DEMEYERE, B., The International Criminal Court’s Office of the Prosecutor: Navigating between Independence and Accountability?, in «International Criminal Law Review», Vol. 8, 2008, pp. 273 - 318. X, Judicial Control of Illegal Search and Seizure, in «Yale Law Journal», Vol. 58, 1948, pp. 144 – 164. X, Special Procedural Measures and Protection of Human Rights: Resolution, in «Revue Internationale de Droit Pénal», Vol. 80, 2009/3, pp. 547 – 552. X, The Promises of International Prosecution, in «Harvard Law Review», Vol. 114, 2001, pp. 1957 – 1982. 1072

YOUNG, R., ‘Internationally Recognized Human Rights’ Before the International Criminal Court, in «International and Comparative Law Quarterly», Vol. 60, 2011, pp. 189 – 208. ZACHARIAS, C., Specificity in Professional Responsibility Codes: Theory, Practice, and the Paradigm of Prosecutorial Ethics, in «Notre Dame Law Review», Vol. 69, 1993, pp. 223 – 309. ZAHAR, A., International Court and Private Citizen, in «New Criminal Law Review», Vol. 12, 2009, pp. 569 - 589. ZHOU, H-R., The Enforcement of Arrest Warrants by International Forces: From the ICTY to the ICC, in «Journal of International Criminal Justice», Vol. 4, 2006, pp. 202 – 218.

Contributions ACQUAVIVA, G., Written and Oral Evidence, in L. CARTER and F. POCAR (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: The Interface of Civil Law and Common Law Legal Systems, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013, pp. 99 – 124. AHMED, A. and DAY, M., Prosecution Criteria at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal, in M. BERGSMO (ed.), Criteria for Prioritizing and Selecting Core International Crimes Cases, Oslo, Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2010, pp. 107 – 116. AKANDE, D., Sources of International Criminal Law, in A. CASSESE (ed.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 41 53. ALAMUDDIN, A., Collection of Evidence, in K.A.A. KHAN, C. BUISMAN and C. GOSNELL (eds.), Principles of Evidence in International Criminal Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 231 – 305. AMBOS, K. and BOCK, S., Procedural Regimes, in L. REYDAMS, J. WOUTERS and C. RYNGAERT (eds.), International Prosecutors, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 488 – 541. AMBOS, K., From Ad Hoc Imposition to a Treaty-Based Universal System, in C. STAHN and L. VAN DEN HERIK (eds.), Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 161 – 177. ANGERMAIER, C., Case Selection and Prioritization Criteria in the Work of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, in M. BERGSMO (ed.), Criteria for Prioritizing and Selecting Core International Crimes Cases, Oslo, Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2010, pp. 27 - 44. ARANBURU, X.A., Gravity of Crimes and Responsibility of the Suspect, in M. BERGSMO (ed.), Criteria for Prioritizing and Selecting Core International Crimes Cases, Oslo, Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2010, pp. 205 – 236. 1073

ARANBURU, X.A., Methodology for the Criminal Investigation of International Crimes, in A. SMEULERS, Collective Violence and International Criminal Justice, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2010, pp. 355 -381. BERGSMO, M. and KEEGAN, M.J., Case Preparation for the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, in Manual on Human Rights Monitoring: An Introduction for Human Rights Field Officers, Oslo, Norwegian Centre for Human Rights, 2008, 19p. BERGSMO, M. and KRUGER, P., Article 53, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1065 – 1076. BERGSMO, M. and KRUGER, P., Article 54, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1077 – 1087. BERGSMO, M. and PEJIĆ, J., Article 15, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 581 – 593. BERGSMO, M. and WILEY, W.H., Human Rights Professionals and the Criminal Investigation and Prosecution of Core International Crimes, in S. SKÅRE, I. BURKEY and H. MØRK (eds.), Manual on Human Rights Monitoring: An Introduction for Human Rights Field Officers, Oslo, Norwegian Centre for Human Rights, 2010, 28p. BERGSMO, M., CISSÉ, C. and STAKER, C., The Prosecutors of the International Tribunals: The Case of the Nuremberg and Tokyo Tribunals, the ICTY and ICTR, and the ICC Compared, in L. ARBOUR, A. ESER, K. AMBOS and A. SANDERS (eds.), The Prosecutor of an International Criminal Court: International Workshop in Co-operation with the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals (ICTY and ICTR), Freiburg im Breisgau, Max-Planck Institut für ausländisches und internationales Strafrecht, 2000, pp. 121 – 154. BITTI, G., Article 21 of the Statute of the ICC and the Treatment of Sources of Law in the Jurisprudence of the ICC, in C. STAHN and G. SLUITER (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court, Leiden, Koninklijke Brill, 2009, pp. 285 - 304. BITTI, G., Compensation to an Arrested or Convicted Person, in R.S. LEE (ed.), The International Criminal Court, Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Ardsley, Transnational Publishers, 2001, pp. 623 – 636. BLOM, T., Privacy, EVRM en (straf)rechtshandhaving, in C.H. BRANTS, P.A.M. MEVIS and E. PRAKKEN (eds.), Legitieme strafvordering, Rechten van de mens als inspiratie in de 21e eeuw, Groningen – Antwerpen, Intersentia, 2001, pp. 119 – 137. BOHLANDER, M., The Defence, in G. BOAS and W.A. SCHABAS (eds.), International Criminal Law Developments in the Case Law of the ICTY, Leiden-Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2003, pp. 35 – 74. 1074

BRADLEY, C.M., United States, in C.M. BRADLEY, Criminal Procedure: A Worldwide Study, Durham, Carolina Academic Press, 1999, pp. 519 – 548. BRADY, H. and JENNINGS, M., Appeal and Revision, in S. LEE (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute: Issues, Negotiations, Results, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 1999, pp. 294 – 304. CAPE, E. and HODGSON, J., The Investigative Stage of the Criminal Process in England and Wales, in E. CAPE, J. HODGSON, T. PRAKKEN and T. SPRONKEN (eds.), Suspects in Europe: Procedural Rights at the Investigative Stage of the Criminal Process in the European Union, Oxford, Intersentia, 2007, pp. 59 – 78. CAPE, E., HODGSON, J., PRAKKEN, T. and SPRONKEN, T., Procedural Rights at the Investigative Stage: Towards a Real Commitment to Minimum Standards, in E. CAPE, J. HODGSON, T. PRAKKEN and T. SPRONKEN (eds.), Suspects in Europe: Procedural Rights at the Investigative Stage of the Criminal Process in the European Union, Oxford, Intersentia, 2007, pp. 1 – 28. CASSESE, A., Introduction, in A. CASSESE (ed.), Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. xvii – xxii. CASSESE, A., The Contribution of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia to the Ascertainment of General Principles of Law Recognized by the Community of Nations, in S. YEE and W. TIEYA (eds.), International Law in the Post-Cold War World: Essays in Memory of Li Haopei, London and New York, Routledge, 2001, pp. 43-55. CASSESE, A., The Influence of the European Court of Human Rights on International Criminal Tribunals – Some Methodological Remarks, in M. BERGSMO, Human Rights and Criminal Justice for the Downtrodden: Essays in Honour of Asbjørn Eide, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2003, pp. 19 – 52. CÉDRAS, J., National Report on France, in L. ARBOUR, A. ESER, K. AMBOS and A. SANDERS (eds.), The Prosecutor of an International Criminal Court: International Workshop in Co-Operation with the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals (ICTY and ICTR), Freiburg im Breisgau, Max-Planck Institut für ausländisches und internationales Strafrecht, 2000, pp. 324 – 332. CIAMPI, A., The Obligation to Cooperate, in A. CASSESE et al. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 1607 – 1638. CORACINI, C., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER, Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: the Special Panels for Serious Crimes 2003 – 2006, Vol. XVI, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2009, pp. 199 – 204. DAMAŠKA, M., Problematic Features of International Criminal Procedure, in A. CASSESE (ed.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 175 – 186.

1075

DAMAŠKA, M., Should National and International Justice be Subjected to the same Evaluative Framework?, in G. SLUITER, H. FRIMAN, S. LINTON, S. VASILIEV and S. ZAPPALÀ (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 1418 – 1422. DE GURMENDI, S.A.F., International Criminal Law Procedures, the Process of Negotiations, in S. LEE (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute: Issues, Negotiations, Results, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 1999, pp. 217 – 227. DE GURMENDI, S.A.F., The Role of the International Prosecutor, in R.S. LEE (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute, Issues, Negotiations, Results, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 1999, pp. 175 – 188. DE HOOG, A., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER, Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: Timor Leste – The Special Panels for Serious Crimes 2001 – 2003, Vol. XIII, 2008, pp. 85 – 95. DE MEESTER, K., Coercive Measures, Privacy Rights and Judicial Supervision in International Criminal Investigations: in Need of Further Regulation?, in G. SLUITER and S. VASILIEV (eds.), London, Cameron May, 2009, pp. 273 – 309. DE MEESTER, K., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER, Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 29 February 2005 – 16 November 2005, Vol. XXVII, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2011, pp. 143 – 149. DE MEESTER, K., PITCHER, K., RASTAN, R. and SLUITER, G., Investigation, Coercive Measures, Arrest and Surrender, in H. FRIMAN, S. LINTON, G. SLUITER, S. VASILIEV and S. ZAPALLÀ (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 171 – 380. DEEN-RACSMÁNY, Z. and KOK, E., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER, Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 2004, Vol. XX, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2009, pp. 70 – 77. DEGUZMAN, M.M. and SCHABAS, W.A., Initiation of Investigations and Selection of Cases, in G. SLUITER, H. FRIMAN, S. LINTON, S. VASILIEV and S. ZAPPALÀ (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 131 – 169. DEGUZMAN, M.M., Article 21, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 701 – 712. DERVIEUX, V., The French System, in M. DELMAS-MARTY and J.R. SPENCER (eds.), European Criminal Procedure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 218 – 291. DIMITRIJEVIĆ, V. and MILANOVIĆ, M., Human Rights before International Criminal Courts, in J. GRIMHEDEN and R. RING, Human Rights Law, From Dissemination to 1076

Application: Essays in Honour of Göran Melander, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006, pp. 149 – 168. EISSEN, M.A., The Principle of Proportionality in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights, in R.ST.J MACDONALD, F. MATSCHER and H. PETZOLD (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights, Dordrecht – Boston – London, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993, pp. 125 – 146. ESER, A., The “Adversarial” Procedure: A Model Superior to Other Trial Systems in International Criminal Justice? Reflections of a Judge, in T. KREUSMANN (ed.), ICTY: Towards a Fair Trial?, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2009, pp. 207 – 227. ESER, A., Procedural Structure and Features of International Criminal Justice: Lessons from the ICTY, in B. SWART, A. ZAHAR and G. SLUITER (eds.), The Legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 108 - 148. FAIRLIE, M., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER, Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 2002 - 2003, Vol. XI, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2007, pp. 219 – 226. FERMON, J., VERBRUGGEN, F. and DE DECKER, S., The Investigative Stage of the Criminal Process in Belgium, in E. CAPE, J. HODGSON, T. PRAKKEN and T. SPRONKEN (eds.), Suspects in Europe: Procedural Rights at the Investigative Stage of the Criminal Process in the European Union, Intersentia, Oxford, 2007, pp. 29 – 58. FOURMY, O., Powers of the Pre-Trial Chambers, in A. CASSESE, P. GAETA and J.R.W.D. JONES (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp.1207 - 1230. FRIMAN, H., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER, Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda 2001 – 2002, Vol. X, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2007, pp. 119 – 124. FRIMAN, H., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER, Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: the Special Court for Sierra Leone 2003 – 2004, Vol. IX, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2006, pp. 345 – 353. FRIMAN, H., Immunity of Property, in A. CASSESE, The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 369 – 370. FRIMAN, H., Investigation and Prosecution, in R.S. LEE (ed.), The International Criminal Court, Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Ardsley, Transnational Publishers, 2001, pp. 493 -538. FRIMAN, H., Rights of Persons Suspected or Accused of a Crime, in S. LEE (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute: Issues, Negotiations, Results, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 1999, pp. 247 – 262.

1077

FRIMAN, H., The Rules of Procedure and Evidence in the Investigative Stage, in H. FISHER, C. KRESS and S.R. LÜDER (eds.), International and National Prosecution of Crimes under International Law: Current Developments, Berlin, Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz GmbH, 2001, pp. 191-217. FUJIWARA, H. and PARMENTIER, S., Investigations, in L. REYDAMS, J. WOUTERS and C. REYNGAERT (eds.), International Prosecutors, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 572 – 603. GAYNOR, F., Admissibility of Documentary Evidence, in G. SLUITER, H. FRIMAN, S. LINTON, S. VASILIEV and S. ZAPPALÀ (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 1044 – 1082. GAYNOR, F., JACOBS, D., KLAMBERG, M. and TOCHILOVSKY, V., Law of Evidence, in G. SLUITER, H. FRIMAN, S. LINTON, S. VASILIEV and S. ZAPPALÀ (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 1015 -1149. GAYNOR, F., Provisional Release in the Law of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, in J. DORIA, H-P GASSER and M.C. BASSIOUNI (eds.), The Legal Regime of the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Professor Igor Blishchenko, Leiden – Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009, pp. 183 – 207. GLESS, S., Functions and Constitution of the Court at the Pre-Trial and Trial Phase, in ESER and RABENSTEIN (eds.), Strafjustiz im Spannungsfeld von Effizienz und Fairness, Berlin, Dunker & Humblot, 2004, pp. 344 – 348. GOOSSENS, F., Gevraagd: duidelijkheid voor de politie. Vijf samenhangende stellingen over de legaliteit van politioneel optreden en het bewaren ervan vanuit de Antigoonrechtspraak in F. DERUYCK, M. DE SWAEF, J. ROZIE, M. ROZIE, P. TRAEST and R. VERSTRAETEN (eds), De wet voorbij. Liber Amicorum Luc Huybrechts, Intersentia, Mortsel, 2010, pp. 155 180. GOSNELL, C., Admissibility of Evidence, in K.A.A. KHAN, C. BUISMAN and C. GOSNELL (eds.), Principles of Evidence in International Criminal Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 375 – 442. GRADONI, L., The Human Rights Dimension of International Criminal Procedure, in G. SLUITER, H. FRIMAN, S. LINTON, S. VASILIEV and S. ZAPPALÀ (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 74 – 95. GRANDE, E., Dances of Criminal Justice: Thoughts on Systemic Differences and the Search for the Truth, in J. JACKSON, M. LANGER and P. TILLERS (eds.), Crime, Procedure and Evidence in a Comparative and International Context. Essays in Honour of Professor Mirjam Damaška, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing, 2008, pp. 145 – 164. GUARIGLIA, F. and HOCHMAYR, G., Article 56, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1107 – 1115. 1078

GUARIGLIA, F., HARRIS, K. and HOCHMAYR, G., Article 57, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1117 – 1131. GUARIGLIA, F., The Selection of Cases by the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, in C. STAHN and G. SLUITER (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court, Leiden, Koninklijke Brill, 2009, pp. 209 – 217. HALL, C.K., Article 55, in O. TRIFFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observer’s Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1089 – 1105. HALL, C.K., Article 58, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1133 – 1146. HALL, C.K., Article 59, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1147 - 1158. HALL, C.K., The Danger of Selective Justice: All Cases Involving Crimes under International Law Should be Investigated and the Suspects, when there is Sufficient Admissible Evidence, Prosecuted, in M. BERGSMO (ed.), Criteria for Prioritizing and Selecting Core International Crimes Cases, Oslo, Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2010, pp. 171 – 181. HARMON, M. and KARAGIANNAKIS, M., The Disclosure of Exculpatory Material by the Prosecution to the Defence under Rule 68 of the ICTY Rules, in R. MAY et al. (eds.), Essays on ICTY Procedure and Evidence, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2001, pp. 315 – 328. HEALY, P., Canada, in L. ARBOUR, A. ESER, K. AMBOS and A. SANDERS (eds.), The Prosecutor of an International Criminal Court: International Workshop in Co-Operation with the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals (ICTY and ICTR), Freiburg im Breisgau, Max-Planck Institut für ausländisches und internationales Strafrecht, 2000, pp. 245 – 250. HEIKKILÄ, M., The Balanced Scorecard of International Criminal Tribunals, in C. RYNGAERT, The Effectiveness of International Criminal Justice, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2009, pp. 27 – 54. INAZUMI, M., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER (eds.), Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda 20002001, Vol. VI, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2003, pp. 437 – 443. JONES, J.R.W.D., The Office of the Prosecutor, in A. CASSESE, P. GAETA and J. R.W.D. JONES (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 269 – 274.

1079

JÖRG, N., FIELDS, S. and BRANTS, C., Are Inquisitorial and Adversarial Systems Converging?, in P. FENNELL, C. HARDING, N. JÖRG and B. SWART (eds.), Criminal Justice in Europe, a Comparative Study, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1995, pp. 41 – 56. JUY-BIRMANN, R., The German System, in M. DELMAS-MARTY and J.R. SPENCER (eds.), European Criminal Procedure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 292 – 347. KARNAVAS, M., Gathering Evidence in International Criminal Trials – The View of the Defence Lawyer, in M. BOHLANDER (ed.), International Criminal Justice: A Critical Analysis of Institutions and Procedures, London, Cameron May, 2007, pp. 75 – 152. KHAN, K.A.A., Article 60, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1159 – 1169. KIRSCH, P. and ROBINSON, D., Referral by States Parties, in A. CASSESE, P. GAETA and J.R.W.D. JONES (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 619 – 625. KIRSCH, S., Finding the Truth at International Criminal Tribunals, in T. KREUSMANN (ed.), ICTY: Towards a Fair Trial?, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2009, pp. 47 – 62. KLAMBERG, M., Law of Evidence: General Requirements for the Admission of Evidence, in G. SLUITER, H. FRIMAN, S. LINTON, S. VASILIEV and S. ZAPPALÀ (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 1016 – 1043. KLIP, A., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER, Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: The Special Court for Sierra Leone 2003 - 2004, Vol. IX, 2001, pp. 741 – 742. KNOOPS, G.-J., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER (eds.), Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda 20002001, Vol. VI, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2003, pp. 216 – 222. KRESS, C. and BROOMHALL, B., Implementing Cooperation Duties under the Rome Statute: A Comparative Synthesis, in C. KRESS, F. LATTANZI, B. BROOMHALL and V. SANTORI (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and Domestic Legal Orders: Volume II: Constitutional Issues, Cooperation and Enforcement, Nomos Verlagsgesselschaft – Editrice il Serente, Baden-Baden – Ripa di Fagnano Alto, 2005, pp. 515 – 543. KRESS, C. and PROST, K., Article 102, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1645 - 1646. KRESS, C. and PROST, K., Article 86, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1513 – 1516. 1080

KRESS, C. and PROST, K., Article 87, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1517 - 1531. KRESS, C. and PROST, K., Article 93 in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1571 – 1588. KRESS, C. and PROST, K., Article 98, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1601 – 1620. KRESS, C. and PROST, K., Article 99, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1621 – 1629. KRESS, C. and SLUITER, G., Imprisonment, in A. CASSESE, P. GAETA and J.R.W.D. JONES (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 1757 - 1821. KRESS, C., PROST, K. and WILKITZKI, P., Part 9, International Cooperation and Judicial Assistance: Preliminary Remarks, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1503 - 1512. KRESS, C., Witnesses in Proceedings Before the International Criminal Court, in H. FISHER, C. KRESS and S.R. LÜDER (eds.), International and National Prosecution of Crimes under International Law: Current Developments, Berlin, Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz GmbH, 2001, pp. 309 – 383. KÜHNE, H-H., Germany, in C. VAN DEN WYNGAERT, Criminal Procedures in the European Community, Brussels, Butterworths, 1993, pp. 137 – 162. LEWIS, P. and FRIMAN, H., Reparations to Victims, in R.S. LEE (ed.), The International Criminal Court, Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Ardsley, Transnational Publishers, 2001, pp. 474 – 491. LUBAN, D., Fairness to Rightness: Jurisdiction, Legality and the Legitimacy of the International Criminal Law, in S. BESSON and J. TASIOULAS (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law, New York, Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 569 – 588. MARTIN-CHENUT, K., Procès international et modèles de justice pénale, in H. ASCENSIO (ed.), Droit international pénal, Paris, Pedone, 2012, pp. 847 – 863. MCBRIDE, J., Proportionality and the European Convention on Human Rights, in E. ELLIS (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe, Oxford – Portland Oregon, Hart Publishing, 1999, pp. 23 – 36.

1081

MCDERMOTT, Y., Rights in Reverse: A Critical Analysis of Fair Trial Rights under International Criminal Law, in W.A. SCHABAS (ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to International Criminal Law, Farnham, Ashgate, 2013, pp. 165 – 180. MCINTYRE, G., Defining Human Rights, in G. BOAS and W.A. SCHABAS (eds.), International Criminal Law Developments in the Case Law of the ICTY, Brill Academic Publishers, Leiden, 2003, pp. 193 – 238. MÉGRET, F., Accountability and Ethics, in L. REYDAMS, J. WOUTERS and C. RYNGAERT (eds.), International Prosecutors, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 416 – 487. MÉGRET, F., In Search of the ‘Vertical’: Towards an Institutional Theory of International Criminal Justice’s Core, in C. STAHN and L. VAN DEN HERIK (eds.), Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 178 – 224. MÉGRET, F., The Sources of International Criminal Procedure, in G. SLUITER, H. FRIMAN, S. LINTON, S. VASILIEV and S. ZAPPALÀ (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 68 – 73. MEVIS, P., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER, Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 1997-1999, Vol. III, 2001, pp. 338 – 342. MICHELICH, J., National Report, in L. ARBOUR, A. ESER, K. AMBOS and A. SANDERS (eds.), The Prosecutor of an International Criminal Court: International Workshop in CoOperation with the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals (ICTY and ICTR), Freiburg im Breisgau, Max-Planck Institut für ausländisches und internationales Strafrecht, 2000, pp. 481 – 485. MOCHOCHOKO, P., International Cooperation and Judicial Assistance, in S. LEE (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute: Issues, Negotiations, Results, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 1999, pp. 305 – 317. MORRÉ, P., National Report: Germany, in L. ARBOUR, A. ESER, K. AMBOS and A. SANDERS (eds.), The Prosecutor of an International Criminal Court: International Workshop in Co-operation with the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals (ICTY and ICTR), Freiburg im Breisgau, Max-Planck Institut für ausländisches und internationales Strafrecht, 2000, pp. 341 – 348. MØSE, E., Impact of Human Rights Convention on the two ad hoc Tribunals, in M. BERGSMO, Human Rights and Criminal Justice for the Downtrodden: Essays in Honour of Asbjørn Eide, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2003, pp. 179 – 208. MUNDIS, D.A., Reporting Non-Compliance: Rule 7bis, in R. MAY et al. (eds.), Essays on ICTY Procedure and Evidence in Honour of Gabrielle Kirk McDonald, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2001, pp. 421 – 438.

1082

NERENBERG, M. and TIMMERMAN, W., Documentary Evidence, in K.A.A. KHAN, C. BUISMAN and C. GOSNELL (eds.), Principles of Evidence in International Criminal Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 443 – 498. NERLICH, V., The Status of ICTY and ICTR Precedent in Proceedings before the ICC, in C. STAHN and G. SLUITER (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court, Leiden, Koninklijke Brill, 2009, pp. 305 – 325. NSEREKO, D., Cooperation with the Court on Matters of Arrest and Surrender of Indicted Fugitives: Lessons from the ad hoc Tribunals and National Jurisdictions, in J. DORIA, H-P GASSER and M.C. BASSIOUNI (eds.), The Legal Regime of the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Professor Igor Blishchenko, Leiden – Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009, pp. 975 – 995. OBOTE-ODORA, A., Case Selection and Prioritization Criteria at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, in M. BERGSMO (ed.), Criteria for Prioritizing and Selecting Core International Crimes Cases, Oslo, Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2010, pp. 45 – 68. OHLIN, J. D., Peace, Security and Prosecutorial Discretion, in C. STAHN and G. SLUITER (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court, Leiden, Koninklijke Brill, 2009, pp. 185 – 208. OHLIN, J.D., Goals of International Criminal Justice and International Criminal Procedure, in G. SLUITER, H. FRIMAN, S. LINTON, S. VASILIEV and S. ZAPPALÀ, International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 55 – 68. ORIE, A., Accusatorial v. Inquisitorial Approach in International Criminal Proceedings prior to the Establishment of the ICC and in the Proceedings Before the ICC, in A. CASSESE et al. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 1439 – 1495. ORIE, A.M.M., De verdachte tussen wal en schip òf de systeem-breuk in de kleine rechtshulp, in E.A. DE LA PORTE et al., Bij deze stand van zaken - bundel opstellen aangeboden aan A. L. Melai, Gouda, Quint, 1983, pp. 351 – 361. PELLET, A., Applicable Law, in A. CASSESE, P. GAETA and J.R.W.D. JONES (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 1051 – 1084. PERRODET, A., The Public Prosecutor, in M. DELMAS-MARTY and J.R. SPENCER (eds.), European Criminal Procedure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 415 – 458. PIRAGOFF, D.K., Article 69, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1301 – 1336. POCAR, F. and CARTER, L., The Challenge of Shaping Procedures in International Criminal Courts, in L. CARTER and F. POCAR (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: The 1083

Interface of Civil Law and Common Law Legal Systems, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013, pp. 1 – 33. PRAKKEN, T. and SPRONKEN, T., The Investigative Stage of the Criminal Process in the Netherlands in E. CAPE, J. HODGSON, T. PRAKKEN and T. SPRONKEN (eds.), Suspects in Europe: Procedural Rights at the Investigative Stage of the Criminal Process in the European Union, Oxford, Intersentia, 2007, pp. 155 – 179. RASTAN, R., The Responsibility to Enforce – Connecting Justice with Unity, in C. STAHN and G. SLUITER (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court, Leiden, Koninklijke Brill, 2009, pp. 163 – 182. REISINGER, A., Cooperation from States and Other Entities, in G. SLUITER, H. FRIMAN, S. LINTON, S. VASILIEV and S. ZAPPALÀ (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 95 – 116. ROACH, K.W., Canada, in C. M. BRADLEY, Criminal Procedure: A Worldwide Study, Durham, Carolina Academic Press, 1999, pp. 57 – 90. ROBINSON, P.L., Fair but Expeditious Trials, in H. ABTAHI and G. BOAS (eds.), The Dynamics of International Criminal Justice, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2006, pp. 169 - 192. ROHAN, C.M., Rules Governing the Presentation of Testimonial Evidence, in K.A.A. KHAN, C. BUISMAN and C. GOSNELL (eds.), Principles of Evidence in International Criminal Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 499 – 550. RUXTON, G. F., Present and Future Record of Arresting War Criminals; the View of the Public Prosecutor of ICTY, in W.A.M. VAN DIJK and J.I. HOVENS (eds.), Arresting War Criminals, Nijmegen, Wolf Legal Productions, 2001, pp. 19 – 23. RYNGAERT, C., Arrest and Detention, in L. REYDAMS, J. WOUTERS and C. RYNGAERT (eds.), International Prosecutors, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 647 - 699. SALAS, D., The Role of the Judge, in M. DELMAS-MARTY and J.R. SPENCER (eds.), European Criminal Procedure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 488 – 541. SANDERS, A., England and Wales (United Kingdom), in L. ARBOUR, A. ESER, K. AMBOS and A. SANDERS (eds.), The Prosecutor of an International Criminal Court: International Workshop in Co-operation with the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals (ICTY and ICTR), Freiburg im Breisgau, Max-Planck Institut für ausländisches und internationales Strafrecht, 2000, pp. 297 – 306. SCHABAS, W. A., In Absentia Proceedings before International Criminal Courts, in G. SLUITER and S. VASILIEV (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Towards a Coherent Body of Law, London, Cameron May, 2009, pp. 355 – 380.

1084

SCHABAS, W.A., Article 66, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1233 - 1245. SCHABAS, W.A., Article 67, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1247 - 1274. SCHABAS, W.A., Droit pénal et droit international des droit de l’homme: faux frères ?, in M. HENZELIN and R. ROTH (eds.), Le Droit Pénal a l’épreuve de l’internationalisation, Genève, Georg Éditeur, 2002, pp. 165-182. SCHABAS, W.A., Prosecutorial Discretion and Gravity, in C. STAHN and G. SLUITER (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court, Leiden, Koninklijke Brill, 2009, pp. 229 – 245. SCHOMBURG, W. and NEMITZ, J.C., The Protection of Human Rights of the Accused Before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, in E. DECAUX, A. DIENG and M. SOW, From Human Rights to International Criminal Law: Studies in Honour of an African Jurist, the Late Judge Laïty Kama, Leiden / Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007, pp. 89 – 108. SEILS, P., The Selection and Prioritization of Cases by the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, in M. BERGSMO (ed.), Criteria for Prioritizing and Selecting Core International Crimes Cases, Oslo, Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2010, pp. 69 – 78. SLOAN, J., Breaching International Law to Ensure its Enforcement: the Balance by the ICTY on Illegal Capture, in T. McCORMACK and A. MCDONALD (eds.), Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, Vol. 6, 2003, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, 2006, pp. 319 – 344. SLUITER, G., Arrest and Surrender, in A. CASSESE (ed.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 250 – 252. SLUITER, G., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER, Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 2000 - 2001, Vol. V, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2003, pp. 283 – 289. SLUITER, G., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER, Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 1997-1999, Vol. III, 2001, pp. 43 – 50. SLUITER, G., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER, Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 2000 2001, Vol. V, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2001, pp. 283 - 289. SLUITER, G., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER, Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 1997-1999, Vol. III, 2001, pp. 151 – 156. 1085

SLUITER, G., Human Rights Protection in the ICC Pre-Trial Phase, in C. STAHN and G. SLUITER (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court, Leiden, Koninklijke Brill, 2009, pp. 459 – 475. SLUITER, G., in S. MÜLLER, S. ZOURIDIS, M. FRISHMAN and L. KISTEMAKER (eds.), The Law of the Future and the Future of the Law, Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, Oslo, 2011, pp. 621 – 632 (available at: http://www.fichl.org/fileadmin/fichl/documents/ FICHL_11_Web.pdf, last visited 22 December 2013). SLUITER, G., Legal Assistance to Internationalized Courts and Tribunals, in C.P.R. ROMANO, A. NOLLKAEMPER and J. KLEFFNER (eds.), Internationalized Criminal Courts: Sierra Leone, East Timor, Kosovo and Cambodia, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 379 – 406. SLUITER, G., The Effects of the Law of International Criminal Procedure on Domestic Proceedings Concerning International Crimes, in G. SLUITER and S. VASILIEV (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Towards a Coherent Body of Law, London, CMP Publishing, 2009, pp. 459 – 488. SLUITER, G., Trends in the Development of a Unified Law of International Criminal Procedure, in C. STAHN and L. VAN DEN HERIK (eds.), Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 585 – 599. SMEULERS, A., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER, Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 2002 - 2003, Vol. XI, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2007, pp. 106 – 112. SMITS, J.M., Redefining Normative Legal Science: Towards an Argumentative Discipline, in F. COOMANS, F. GRÜNFELD and M.T. KAMMINGA (eds.), Methods of Human Rights Research, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2009, pp. 45 – 58. SPENCER, J.R., Evidence, in M. DELMAS-MARTY and J.R. SPENCER (eds.), European Criminal Procedure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 594 – 640. SPENCER, J.R., The English System, in M. DELMAS-MARTY and J.R. SPENCER (eds.), European Criminal Procedure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 142 – 217. STAHN, C., Arrest and Surrender under the ICC Statute: a Contextual Reading, in C. STAHN and L. VAN DEN HERIK (eds.), Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice, The Hague, T.M.C. Asser Press, 2010, pp. 659 – 685. STAHN, C., Judicial Review of Prosecutorial Discretion: Five Years on, in C. STAHN and G. SLUITER (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court, Leiden, Koninklijke Brill, 2009, pp. 247 – 279. STAHN, C., Judicial Review of Prosecutorial Discretion: on Experiments and Imperfections, in G. SLUITER and S. VASILIEV (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Towards a Coherent Body of Law, London, CMP Publishing, 2009, pp. 239 – 272.

1086

STAKER, C., Article 84, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1487 - 1498. STAKER, C., Article 85, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1499 – 1512. STEGMILLER, I., The Pre-Investigation Stage of the ICTY and the ICC Compared, in T. KRUESSMANN (ed.), ICTY: Towards a Fair Trial?, Wien–Graz, Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 2008, pp. 311 – 340. STEWART, J.K., International Criminal Prosecutions. The Ideal Prosecutor: Status, Means and Discretion, in H. DUMONT (ed.), La voie vers la Cour Pénale Internationale: tous les chemins mènent à Rome: les Journées Maximilien-Caron 2003, Montreal, Éditions Thémis, 2004, pp. 14 - 32. STRUETT, M.J., The Politics of Discursive Legitimacy: Understanding the Dynamics and Implications of Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal Court, in S.C. ROACH (ed.), Governance, Order, and the International Criminal Court: Between Realpolitik and a Cosmopolitan Court, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 107 – 132. SWART, B., Arrest and Surrender, in A. CASSESE, P. GAETA and J.R.W.D. JONES (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 1639 – 1703. SWART, B., Arrest Proceedings in the Custodial State, in A. CASSESE, P. GAETA and J.R.W.D. JONES (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 1247 – 1255. SWART, B., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER (eds.), Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda 1994-1999, Vol. II, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2001, pp. 197 - 207. SWART, B., General Problems, in A. CASSESE, P. GAETA and J.R.W.D. JONES (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 1589 - 1605. SWART, B., International Cooperation and Judicial Assistance: General Problems, in A. CASSESE et al. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 1589 - 1606. SWART, B., International Criminal Justice and Models of the Judicial Process, in G. SLUITER and S. VASILIEV (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Towards a Coherent Body of Law, London, Cameron May, 2009, pp. 93 – 118. SWART, B., Internationalized Courts and Substantive Criminal Law, in C.P.R. ROMANO, A. NOLLKAEMPER and J. KLEFFNER (eds.), Internationalized Criminal Courts: Sierra Leone, East Timor, Kosovo and Cambodia, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 291 316. 1087

SWOBODA, S., Admitting Relevant and Reliable Evidence: The ICTY’s Flexible Approach Towards the Admission of Evidence under Rule 89 (C) ICTY RPE, in T. KRUESMANN (ed.), ICTY: Towards a Fair Trial?, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2009, pp. 379 – 388. TAKEMURA, H., Prosecutorial Discretion in International Criminal Justice: Between Fragmentation and Unification, in L. VAN DEN HERIK and C. STAHN (eds.), The Diversification and Fragmentation of International Criminal Law, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012, pp. 633 – 656. TOLBERT, D. and SWINNEN, F., The Protection of, and Assistance to, Witnesses at the ICTY, in H. ABTAHI and G. BOAS (eds.), The Dynamics of International Criminal Justice, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2006, pp. 196 - 199. TRAEST, P., Hard bewijs, wanneer is de rechter overtuigd?, in J.-P. BAUTHIER, D. FLORE, A. MASSET, P. TRAEST and G. VERMEULEN (eds), Bewijs in strafzaken, Brugge, die Keure, 2011, pp. 59 - 79. TRECHSEL, S., Rights in Criminal Proceedings under the ECHR and the ICTY Statute—A Precarious Comparison, in B. SWART, A. ZAHAR and G. SLUITER (eds.), The Legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 149 - 188. TURONE, G., Powers and Duties of the Prosecutor, in A. CASSESE, P. GAETA and J.R.W.D. JONES (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 1137 – 1180. VAN GERVEN, W., The Effect of Proportionality on the Actions of the Member States, in E. ELLIS, The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe, Oxford – Portland Oregon, Hart Publishing, 1999, pp. 37 – 64. VAN SLIEDREGT, E., Arresting War Criminals: Male Captus Bene Detentus, Human Rights and the Rule of Law, in W.A.M. VAN DIJK and J.I. HOVENS (eds.), Arresting War Criminals, Nijmegen, Wolf Legal Productions, 2001, pp. 73 – 83. VASILIEV, S., General Rules and Principles of International Criminal Procedure, in G. SLUITER and S. VASILIEV (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Towards a Coherent Body, London, Cameron May, 2009, pp. 19 – 92. VASILIEV, S., Introduction, in G. SLUITER, H. FRIMAN, S. LINTON, S. VASILIEV and S. ZAPPALÀ (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 1 - 37. VASILIEV, S., Trial, in L. REYDAMS, J. WOUTERS and C. RYNGAERT (eds.), International Prosecutors, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 700 – 796. VIERUCCI, L., ‘Freezing of assets’, in A. CASSESE (ed.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 326 – 328.

1088

WALD, P. and MARTINEZ, J., Provisional Release at the ICTY: A Work in Progress, in R. MAY et al., Essays on ICTY Procedure and Evidence, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2001, pp. 231 – 246. WEIGEND, T. and SALDITT, F., The Investigative Process of the Criminal Process in Germany, in E. CAPE, J. HODGSON, T. PRAKKEN and T. SPRONKEN, Suspects in Europe: Procedural Rights at the Investigative Stage of the Criminal Process in the European Union, Intersentia, Oxford, 2007, pp. 79 – 100. WHITING, A., The ICTY as a Laboratory of International Criminal Procedure, in B. SWART, A. ZAHAR and G. SLUITER (eds.), The Legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 83 – 107. WILKITZI, P., Article 101, in O. TRIFTERER (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers' Notes, Article by Article, München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2008, pp. 1635 – 1644. WLADIMIROFF, W., Cooperation on Criminal Matters: A Defence Perspective, in R. YEPES-ENRÍQUEZ and L. TABASSI (eds.), Treaty Enforcement and International Cooperation in Criminal Matters: with Special Reference to the Chemical Weapons Convention, The Hague, T.M.C. Asser Press, 2002, pp. 242 – 250. ZAHAR, A., Witness Memory and the Manufacture of Evidence at the International Criminal Tribunals, in C. STAHN and L. VAN DEN HERIK (eds.), Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 600 – 610. ZAPPALÀ, S., Commentary, in A. KLIP and G. SLUITER, Annotated Leading Cases of International Criminal Tribunals: the Special Panels for Serious Crimes, Vol. XIII, Antwerp, Intersentia, 2008, pp. 93 – 102. ZAPPALÀ, S., Compensation to an Arrested or Convicted Person, in A. CASSESE, P. GAETA and J.R.W.D. JONES (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 1577 – 1585. ZAPPALÀ, S., Rights of Persons During an Investigation, in A. CASSESE, P. GAETA and J. R.W.D. JONES (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 1181 – 1203.

Conference papers, working papers and other publications HEDER, S., A Review of the Negotiations Leading to the Establishment of the Personal Jurisdiction of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, London – Paris, 2011, 60p (available at: http://www.cambodiatribunalorg/sites/default/files% 20Review%20of%20the%20Negotiations%20Leading%20to%20the%20Establishment%20of %20the%20Personal%20Jurisdiction%20of%20the%20ECCC.pdf, last visited 3 July 2012). MCDONALD, A. and HAVEMAN, R., Prosecutorial Discretion – Some Thoughts on ‘Objectifying’ the Exercise of Prosecutorial Discretion by the Prosecutor of the ICC, Expert 1089

Consultation Process on General Issues Relevant to the ICC Office of the Prosecutor, 15 April 2003, 10p. NSEREKO, D.D.N., Prosecutorial Discretion before National Courts and International Tribunals, Guest Lecture Series of the Office of the Prosecutor, 2004, 17p (available at: http://icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/asp_docs/library/organs/otp/Nsereko.pdf, last visited 10 February 2014). OLÁSOLO, H., The Role of the International Criminal Court in Preventing Atrocity Crimes Through Timely Intervention: From the Humanitarian Intervention Doctrine and Ex Post Facto Judicial Institutions to the Notion of Responsibility to Protect and the Preventative Role of the International Criminal Court, Inaugural Lecture as Chair in International Criminal Law and International Criminal Procedure at Utrecht University, 18 October 2010, (available at: http://www.uu.nl/SiteCollectionDocuments/REBO/REBO_RGL/REBO_RGL_STRAF/inaug ural%20lecture%20Olasolo.pdf, last visited 10 February 2014). OTP, Informal Expert Paper: Fact-Finding and Investigative Functions of the Office of the Prosecutor, Including International Cooperation, 2003, 22p. OTP, Informal Expert Paper: Measures Available to the International Criminal Court to Reduce the Length of Proceedings, 2003, 18p. OTP, Informal Expert Paper: The Principle of Complementarity in Practice, 2003, 37p. QUIRICO, O., The Relationship between General Principles and Custom in International Criminal Law, Working Paper, European University Institute, Florence, 2006, (available at: http://www.eui.eu/Documents/DepartmentsCentres/Law/ResearchTeaching/WorkingGroups/ WGCriminalLawMinutes22Nov2006.pdf, last visited 17 July 2013). SHANY, Y., Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: Can the Unquantifiable be Quantified?, Research Paper No. 03̽10, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2010, 49p (available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1669954, last visited 5 November 2013).

NGO Reports Amnesty International, Cambodia: Khmer Rouge Judgment Welcome, but Raises Human Rights Concerns, 3 February 2012 (available at: http://www.amnesty.org/en/news/ cambodiakhmer-rouge-judgment-welcome-raises-human-rights-concerns-2012-02-03, last visited 4 July 2012). C. REIGER, C. and WIERDA, M., The Serious Crimes Process in Timor-Leste: In Retrospect, International Center for Transnational Justice, 2006, 41p. HRW, Unfinished Business, Closing Gaps in the Selection of ICC Cases, 2011, 50p (available at: http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/icc0911webwcover.pdf, last visited 10 February 2014). 1090

International Bar Association, Fairness at the International Criminal Court, August 2011, 51p. International Bar Association, ICC Perspectives: Witnesses before the International Criminal Court, 2013, 67p (available at: http://www.ibanet.org/Human_Rights_Institute/ICC_Outreach _Monitoring/ICC_IBA_Publications.aspx, last visited 23 November 2013). JSMP, Digest of the Jurisprudence of the Special Panels for Serious Crimes, April 2007, 124p. JSMP, Dili District Court: Final Report, November 2003, 69p (available at: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UNTC/UNPAN014017.pdf, last visited 15 January 2014). Open Society Justice Initiative, Briefing Paper: Recent Developments at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, March 2013 (available at: http://www.refworld. org/pdfid/5242b9f84.pdf , last visited 10 February 2014). Open Society Justice Initiative, Intermediaries and the International Criminal Court: A Role for the Assembly of States Parties, 2011, 5p (available at: http://www.opensociety foundations.org/publications/intermediaries-and-international-criminal-court-role-assemblystates-parties (last visited 29 August 2013). Open Society Justice Initiative, The Future of Cases 003/004 at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, October 2012 (available at: http://www.opensociety foundations.org/sites/default/files/eccc-report-cases3and4-100112_0.pdf, last visited 10 February 2014). Open Society Justice Initiative, Recent Developments in the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, February 2012, 9p (available at: http://www.opensociety foundations.org/sites/default/files/cambodia-eccc-20120223.pdf, last visited 10 February 2014). PERRIELLO, T. and WIERDA, M., the Special Court for Sierra Leone under Scrutiny, ICTJ, March 2006, 56p. REDRESS, State Cooperation and Rights of Victims before the International Criminal Court, 2006, 10p (available at: http://www.redress.org/downloads/countryreports/StateCooperation &RightsofVictims.pdf, last visited 14 February 2014) U.S. BERKELY WAR CRIMES STUDIES CENTER, Interim Report on the Special Court for Sierra Leone, April 2005, 53p. VAN TUYL, P., Effective, Efficient and Fair: An inquiry into the Investigative Practices of the Office of the Prosecutor at the Special Court for Sierra Leone, War Crimes Studies Center, University of California Berkeley, September 2008, 82p. WCRO, the Gravity Threshold of the International Criminal Court, March 2008, 57p.

1091

WCRO, The Relevance of a “Situation” to the Admissibility and Selection of Cases Before the International Criminal Court, October 2009, 36p. YIM, C., Memorandum: Scope of Victim Participation before the ICC and the ECCC, Documentation Center of Cambodia, 2011, 47p.

Blog items BOAS, G., A Response to Christian De Vos, 2011 (available at: http://opiniojuris.org/2011/12/07/a-response-to-christian-de-vos-by-gideon-boas/, last visited 29 August 2013). SCHEFFER, D., The Negotiating history of the ECCC’s Personal Jurisdiction, 26 May 2011 (available at: http://ki-media.blogspot.be/2011/05/negotiating-history-of-ecccs-personal.html, last visited, 10 February 2014).

1092

Suggest Documents