The impact of the ECHR on private international law: An analysis of Strasbourg and selected national case law Kiestra, L.R

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The impact of the ECHR on private international law: An analysis of Strasbourg and selected national case law ...
Author: Anna Byrd
2 downloads 0 Views 79KB Size
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

The impact of the ECHR on private international law: An analysis of Strasbourg and selected national case law Kiestra, L.R.

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA): Kiestra, L. R. (2013). The impact of the ECHR on private international law: An analysis of Strasbourg and selected national case law

General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl)

Download date: 07 Jun 2018

Cases European Court of Human Rights A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455/05, par. 184, ECHR 2009. AGOSI v. the United Kingdom, 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108. Air Canada v. the United Kingdom, 5 May 1995, Series A no. 316-A. Airey v. Ireland. 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32. Aït-Mouhoub v. France, 28 October 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VIII. Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763/97, ECHR 2001-XI. Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27021/08, ECHR 2011. Al-Sadoon and Mufdi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, ECHR 2010 (extracts). Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, ECHR 2011. Ammdjadi v. Germany (dec.), no. 51625/08, 9 March 2010. Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, par. 59, Series A no. 93. Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, ECHR 2004-II. Austria v. Italy, no. 788/60, Yearbook of the European Convention on Human Rights 1961. Axen v. Germany, 8 December 1983, Series A no. 72. Banković and Others v. Belgium and 16 Other Contracting States (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, ECHR 2001-XI. Beer and Regan v. Germany [GC], no. 28934/95, 18 February 1999. Ben El Mahi v. Denmark (dec.), no. 5853/06, ECHR 2006-XV. Besseau v. France, no. 73893/01, 7 March 2006. Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, ECHR 1999-III. Blagojević v. the Netherlands, (dec.), no. 49032/07, 9 June 2009. Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036/98, ECHR 2005-VI. Brualla Gómez de la Torre v. Spain, 19 December 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VIII. Buchholz v. Germany, 6 May 1981, Series A no. 42. Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III. Burghartz v. Switzerland, judgment of 22 February 1994, Series A-280-B. Calabro v. Italy, No. 59895/00, 21 March 2002. Canea Catholic Church v. Greece, 16 December 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VIII. Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200. Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27238/95, ECHR 2001-I. Cruz Varas v. Sweden, 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201. D.D. v. France (dec.), no. 3/02, 8 November 2005 Daoudi v. France, no. 19576/08, 3 December 2009. Darby v. Sweden, 23 October 1990, Series A-187. De Geouffre de la Pradelle v. France, 16 December 1992, Series A no. 253-B. Dinu v. Romania and France, no 6152/02, 4 November 2008. Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1993, par. 33, Series A no. 274. Drozd and Janousek v. France and Spain, 26 June 1992, Series A no. 240.Edificaciones March Gallego S.A. v. Spain, 19 February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I. Einhorn v. France (dec.), no. 71555/01, ECHR 2001-XI. 365

Eriksson v. Sweden, 22 June 1989, Series A no. 156. Ern Makina Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş v. Turkey, no. 70830/01, 3 May 2007. Eskinazi and Chelouche v. Turkey (dec.), no. 14600/05, ECHR 2005-XIII (extracts). Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B. Freimanis and Lidums v. Latvia, (dec.), no. 73443/01, 30 January 2003. Galić v. the Netherlands, (dec.) no. 22617/07, 9 June 2009. García Manibardo v. Spain, no. 38695/97, ECHR 2000-II. Gaygusuz v. Austria, 16 September 1996, par. 42, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV. Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18. Groppera Radio AG and Others v. Switzerland, 28 March 1990, ECHR Series A no. 173. H. v. France, 24 October 1989, Series A no. 162-A. Handyside v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 12 December 1976, ECHR Series A no. 24. Harroudj v. France, no. 43631/09, 4 October 2012. Hentrich v. France, 22 September 1994, Series A no. 296-A. Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, 23 February 2012. Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC], no. 74025/01, ECHR 2005-IX. Hornsby v. Greece, 19 March 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II. Huc v. Romania and Germany (dec.), no. 7269/05, 1 December 2009. Hussin v. Belgium, (dec.), no. 70807/01, 6 May 2004. Iglesias Gil and A.U.I. v. Spain, no. 56673/00, ECHR 2003-V. Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, ECHR 2000-I. Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, par.94, ECHR 2000-I. Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII. İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, ECHR 2000-VII. Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25. Issa and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 31821/96, 30 May 2000. Issa and Others v. Turkey, no. 31821/96, 16 November 2004. J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd and J.A. Pye (Oxford) Land Ltd v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44302/02, ECHR 2007-III. James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98. Jasiūnienė v. Lithuania, no. 41510/98, 6 March 2003. Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, Series A no. 122. Jovanovski v. The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 31731/03, 7 January 2010. K. v. Italy, no. 38805/97, ECHR 2004-VIII. Karalyros and Huber v. Hungary and Greece, no. 75116/01, 6 April 2004. Kart v. Turkey [GC], no. 8917/05, par. 79, ECHR 2009 (extracts). Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, Series A no. 290. Kin Kin-Stib and Majkić v. Serbia, no. 12312/05, 20 April 2010. König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27. Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912/98, ECHR 2004-IX. Kreuz v. Poland, no. 28249/95, ECHR 2001-VI. Krombach v. France, no. 29731/96, ECHR 2000-II. Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1994, Series A no. 297-C. Kutić v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, ECHR 2002-II. Lautsi v. Italy [GC], no. 30814/06, 18 March 2011. Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43. 366

Lindberg v. Sweden (dec.), no. 48198/99, 15 January 2004. Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102. Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, par. 71, Series A-310. Losonci Rose and Rose v. Switzerland, no. 664/06, 9 November 2010. Maire v. Portugal, no. 48206/99, ECHR 2003-VII. Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, ECHR 2005-I. Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, ECHR Series A no. 31. Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, ECHR 2006-XIV. Mary Green and Ajad Farhat v. Malta (dec.), no. 38797/07, 6 July 2010. Maumousseau and Washington v. France, no. 39388/05, ECHR 2007-XIII. McDonald v. France (dec.), no. 18648/04, 29 April 2008. McVicar v. the United Kingdom, no. 46311/99, ECHR 2002-III. Mentzen alias Mencena v. Latvia (dec.), no. 71074/01, 7 December 2004. Mikulić v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, ECHR 2002-I. Multiplex v. Croatia, no. 58112/00, 10 July 2003. Muñoz Diaz v. Spain, no. 49151/07, 8 December 2009. Muñoz Díaz v. Spain, no. 49151/07, ECHR 2009. Négrépontis-Giannisis v. Greece, no. 56759/08, 3 May 2011. Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615/07, ECHR 2010-. Nuutinen v. Finland, no. 32842/96, ECHR 2000-VIII. OAO Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos v. Russia, no. 14902/04, 20 September 2011. Oliveira v. the Netherlands, no. 33129/96, ECHR 2002-IV. Öcalan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46221/99, 14 December 2000. Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, ECHR 2005-IV. Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998VIII. P., C. and S. v. the United Kingdom, no. 56547/00, ECHR 2002-VI. P.P. v. Poland, no. 8677/03, 8 January 2008. Patrono, Cascini and Stefanelli v. Italy, no. 10180/04, 20 April 2006. Pellegrini v. Italy, no. 30882/96, ECHR 2001-VIII. Pfeifer and Plankl v. Austria, 25 February 1992, Series A no. 227. Pini and Others v. Romania, nos. 78028/01 and 78030/01, ECHR 2004-V (extracts). Pla and Puncernau v. Andorra, no. 69498/01, ECHR 2004-VIII. Platform Ärtze für das Leben v. Austria, 21 June 1988, ECHR Series A no. 139. Podkolzina v. Latvia, no. 46726/99, ECHR 2002-II. Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172. Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, ECHR 2001-VIII. Rasmussen v. Denmark, 28 November 1984, Series A no. 87. Ringeisen v. Austria, 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13. Romańczyk v. France, no. 7618/05, 18 November 2010. Saccoccia v. Austria (dec.), no. 69917/01, 5 July 2007. Saccoccia v. Austria, no. 69917/01, 18 December 2008. Saccoccia v. Austria, no. 69917/01, 18 December 2008. Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141/04, 24 June 2010. Sidiropoulos and Others v. Greece, 10 July 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-IV. Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61. 367

Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321/99, ECHR 2003-X. Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161. Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52. Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, ECHR 2005-II. Stjerna v. Finland, 25 November 1994, Series A-299-B. Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B. Stubbings and Others v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV. Sunday Times v the United Kingdom, 26 April 1979, ECHR Series A no. 30. Swedish Engine Drivers’ Union, 6 February 1976, Series A no. 20. Sylvester v. Austria (dec.), no. 54640/00, 9 October 2003. Sylvester v. Austria (no. 2), no. 54640/00, 3 February 2005. Tinnelly & Sons Ltd and Others and McElduff and Others v. the United Kingdom, 10 July 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-IV Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, 13 July 1995, Series A no. 316-B. Ünal Tekeli v. Turkey, no. 29865/96, ECHR 2004-X (extracts). Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, ECHR 2004-VI. Von Maltzan and Others v. Germany (dec.) [GC], nos. 71916/01, 71917/01 and 10260/02, ECHR 2005-V. Vrbica v. Croatia, no. 32540/05, 1 April 2010. W.K. v. Italy (dec.), no. 38805/97, 25 June 2002. Wagner and J.W.M.L. v. Luxembourg, no. 76240/01, ECHR 2007-VII (extracts). Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, ECHR 1999-I. Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33. Women On Waves and Others v. Portugal, no. 31276/05, 3 February 2009. X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, ECHR Series A no. 91. X. v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 8407/78, 6 May 1980, D.R. 179. Zabawska v. Germany (dec.), no. 49935/99, 2 March 2006. Zabawska v. Germany (dec.), no. 49935/99, 3 March 2006. Zvoristeanu v. France (dec.), no. 47128/99, 7 November 2000. European Commission of Human Rights Batali v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 20765/92, 9 January 1995. Decision of the European Commission of Human Rights, no. 6200/73, 13 May 1976, 2 Digest of Strasbourg Case law relating to the European Convention on Human Rights (Article 6) (Köln, Heymann 1984), p. 269. G. and E. v. Norway (dec.), no. 9278/81 & 9415/81 (joined), DR 35. Gauthier v. Belgium (dec.), no. 12603/86, 6 March 1989. Gill and Malone v. the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24001/94, 11 April 1996. H v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 10000/82, 4 July 1983, D.R. 33. Kirchner v. Austria (dec.), 12883/87, 14 October 1991. Lawless v. Ireland, no. 332/57, 2 Yearbook of European Commission on Human Rights (1960). X and Y v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 7229/75, 15 December 1977. X v. Luxembourg (dec.), no. 5288/71, 10 July 1973. X v. Sweden (dec.), no. 7973, 28 February 1979.

368

X v. the Federal Republic of Germany (dec.), no. 1611/62, Yearbook of the European Convention on Human Rights ((1965). X. v. Belgium and the Netherlands (dec.), no. 6482/74, 10 July 1975, DR 6, p. 77. X. v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 8407/78, 6 May 1980, D.R. 179. European Court of Justice ECJ 2 April 2009, Case C-394/07, Gambazzi, ECR 2009, I-2563. ECJ 14 October 2008, Case C-353/06, Grunkin and Paul, ECR 2008, I-7639. ECJ 2 May 2006, Case C-341/04, Eurofood IFSC, ECR 2006, I-3813. ECJ 1 March 2005, Case C-281/02, Owusu v Jackson, ECR 2005, I-1383. ECJ 9 December 2003, Case C-116/02 Erich Gasser GmbH v MISAT Srl, ECR 2003, I-14693 ECJ 2 October 2003, Case C-148/02, Garcia Avello, ECR 2003, I-11613. ECJ 10 July 2003, Booker Aquaculture and Hydo Seafood, Cases C-20/00 and C-64/00, ECR 2003, I-7411. ECJ 11 May 2000, Case C-38/98, Régie Nationale des Usines Renault SA v. Maxicar SpA, ECR 2000, I-2973. ECJ 28 March 2000, Case C-7/98, Krombach v. Bamberski, ECR 2000, I-1935. ECJ 20 March 1997, Case C-323/95, David Charles Hayes and Jeannette Karen Hayes v Kronenberger GmbH., ECR 1997, I-1711. ECJ 6 December 1994, Case C-406/92, Tatry v. Maciej Rataj, ECR 1994, I-5439. ECJ 1 July 1993, Case C 20/92, Hubbard v. Hamburger, ECR 1993, I-3777. ECJ 8 December 1987, Case C-144/86, Gubisch Maschinenfabrik/Giulio Palumbo, ECR 1987, I4861. CJEU 25 October 2012, Case C-133/11, Folien Ficher and Fofitec (not yet published) International Court of Justice ICJ, Netherlands v. Sweden (Case concerning the Application of the Convention of 1902 governing the Guardianship of Infants, Judgment of 28 November 1958) (Boll case), ICJ Rep. 55. Permanent Court of International Justice PCIJ, 7 September 1927, Series A No. 10, p. 18-19 (Lotus). England Al-Bassam v. Al-Bassam, [2004] EWCA Civ. 857. Douglas & Others v. Hello Ltd. & Others [2005] EMLR 609, [2005] 4 All ER 128, [2005] 2 FCR 487, [2005] EMLR 28, [2005] 3 WLR 881, [2005] HRLR 27, [2005] EWCA Civ 595, [2006] QB 125. Douglas & Others v. Hello Ltd. & Others [2007]UKHL 2. Golubovich v Golubovich 2010] EWCA Civ 810. Government of the United States of America v. Montgomery (No.2) [2004] UKHL 37. Hemain v Hemain [1988] 2 FLR 388 Kuwait Airways Corpn v. Iraqi Airways Co (Nos 4 and 5) [2002] 2 AC 883. Lubbe v. Capre Plc, [2000] 1 WLR 1545. Mark v. Mark [2004] EWCA Civ. 168, [2005] Fam. 267. 369

Mark v. Mark [2005] UKHL 42. Maronier v. Larmer [2002] EWCA Civ. 774, [2003] Q.B. 620. Nasser v United Bank of Kuwait [2001] EWCA Civ 556, [2002] 1 All E.R. 401 (CA). NG v KR, [2008] EWHC 1532 (Fam), [2008] EWHC 1532 (Fam), [2009] 1 FLR 1478, [2009] 1 FCR 35, [2008] Fam Law 1082. Oppenheimer v. Cattermole [1976] AC 249. OT Africa Line Ltd v Hijazy (The Kribi) [2001] 1 Lloyd’s Report 76. R (Ullah) v. Special Adjudicator [2004] UKHL 26 Re : X & Y (Foreign Surrogacy) [2008] EWHC 3030 (Fam). Re J (a child) [2005] UKHL 40 Re N (Recognition of Foreign Adoption Order [2009] EWHC 29 (Fam.), [2010] 1 FLR 1102. Singh v Entry Clearance Officer (New Delhi) [2004] EWCA Civ 1075, [2005] QB 608. Spiladia Maritime Corp v. Cansulex Ltd, [1987] AC 460. The Atlantic Star [1974] A.C. 436. Williams & Humbert Ltd v. W&H Trade Marks (Jersey) Ltd [1986] A.C. 368. France Cass. 1re civ., 26 October 2011, JDI 2012, p. 176 (note Guillaumé). Cass. 1re civ., 10 May 2006. Cass.civ. 11 March 1997, Rev.crit.dr.int.priv. 1997, p. 585 (note H. Gaudemet-Tallon). Cass.civ. 1 June 1994, Rev.crit.dr.int.priv. 1995, p. 103 (note J. Déprez). Cass. 1re civ., 10 February 1993, Rev.crit dr.int.priv. 1993, 620 (note J. Foyer). Cour de Paris 14 June 1994, Rev. crit.dr.int.priv. 1995, 308 (note Y. Lequette). Germany BverfG 30 November 1982, IPrax 1984, p. 88. BverfG 31 May 1971, 31 BVerfGE 58; NJW 1971, p. 1508. Italy Italian Constitutional Court 26 February 1987, Rev.crit.dr.int 1987, p. 563 (note B. Ancel). The Netherlands HR 18 March 2011, RvdW 2011, 392. HR 7 January 2011, NJ 2011, 134 HR 12 December 2008, RvdW 2009, 41; NIPR 2009, 1. HR 19 October 2007, NIPR 2007, 267. HR 1 September 2006, RvdW 2006, 769; JOL 2006, 475; JPF 2006, 136 (note A.E. Oderkerk). HR 3 December 2004, NIPR 2005, 3. HR 29 November 2002, NJ 2003, 35. HR 10 September 1999, NJ 2001, 41. HR 15 April 1994, NJ 1994, 576, NIPR 1994, 210. HR 30 March 1990, NJ 1991. HR 26 October 1984, NJ 1985, 696. Hof Amsterdam 10 May 2011, RN 2011, 82 370

Hof Amsterdam 3 May 2011, NIPR 2011, 295 Hof Amsterdam 17 July 2008, NIPR 2009, 31. Hof Amsterdam 9 February 2006, JPF 2006, 71 (note A.E. Oderkerk), NIPR 2006, 98; Hof Amsterdam 6 March 2003, NIPR 2005, 305. Hof Arnhem 4 November 2003, NIPR 2004, 43. Hof ‘s-Hertogenbosch 27 November 2008, NIPR 2009, 95. Hof ’s-Gravenhage 3 October 2007, NIPR 2008, 7. Hof ‘s-Gravenhage 18 April 2007, NIPR 2007, 184. Hof ’s-Gravenhage, 21 December 2005, EB 2006, 32; NJF 2006, 154. Rb. Alkmaar 16 January 2002, NIPR 2002, 170. Rb. Amsterdam 17 March 2011, LJN BP8070 Rb. Amsterdam 23 September 2009, NIPR 2010, 21. Rb. Amsterdam, 31 October 2007, NIPR 2007, 308. Rb. Amsterdam 23 November 2005, NIPR 2006, 14. Rb. Haarlem 22 July 2008, NIPR 2008, 275. Rb. Haarlem 1 February 2005, NIPR 2005, 124. Rb. ‘s-Gravenhage 21 March 2012, LJN BV 9748. Rb. ‘s-Gravenhage 3 November 2008, NIPR 2010, 23. Rb. ‘s-Gravenhage 12 January 2006, LJN AV2498. Rb. ‘s-Gravenhage 22 April 2004, NIPR 2005, 224. Rb. Rotterdam 22 March 2001, NIPR 2001, 300. Rb. Rotterdam 11 January 2001, NIPR 2001, 146. Rb. Utrecht 31 October 2007, NIPR 2008, 33. Rb. Utrecht 5 November 2003, NIPR 2004, 236. Rb. Zwolle-Lelystad 20 July 2005, NIPR 2005, 327. Ktg. Amsterdam, 5 January 1996, NIPR 1996, 145. Switzerland ATF 134 III 467 (25 June 2008) ATF 132 III 661 (14 August 2006) ATF 132 III 609 (14 July 2006) ATF 132 I 134 (4 May 2006) ATF 131 III 511 (31 May 2005) ATF 131 III 153 (22 December 2004) ATF 131 II 169 (7 February 2005) ATF 128 I 63 (4 March 2002) ATF 126 III 327 (4 July 2000) ATF 126 III 249 (28 April 2000) ATF 126 III 101 (6 October 1999) ATF 125 I 257 (24 June 1999) ATF 122 III 344 (3 September 1996) ATF 116 II 625 (19 December 1990) ATF 111 Ia 12 (13 March 1985) ATF 103 Ia 199 (9 February 1977) 371

ATF 85 II 305 (17 October 1959) Judgment of the Tribunal fédéral, 5A_171/2010, 19 April 2010 (unpublished). Judgment of the Tribunal fédéral, 4A_305/2009, 5 October 2009 (unpublished). Judgment of the Tribunal fédéral, 5A.4/2005, 24 May 2005 (unpublished). Judgment of the Tribunal fédéral, 1P.390/2004/col, 28 October 2004 (unpublished). Judgment of the Tribunal fédéral, 4P.48/2002, 4 June 2002 (unpublished). Judgment of the Tribunal fédéral, 5P.250/2001, 17 April 2002 (unpublished). Judgment of the Tribunal fédéral, 5 March 1991, La Semaine judicidaire 1991, p. 457.

Obergericht Zürich, BlZR 89 1990, no. 65, p. 139. Obergericht Zürich, II. Zivilkammer, 1 May 1959, Annuaire suisse de droit international 1961, p. 293-295. Tribunal cantonal, Neuchâtel, IIe Cour civile, 26 July 2001. Cour de justice GE, 14 November 1991, SJ 1992, p. 219.

United States Kiobel, et al., v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al., 132 S.Ct. 472 (US 2011) International Shoe v. Washington, 336 US 310.

372

Suggest Documents