The Impact of the Advanced Practice Nurse-led Critical Care Rounds on the Knowledge of ICU Nurses

The Impact of the Advanced Practice Nurse-led Critical Care Rounds on the Knowledge of ICU Nurses Ms CHUA Cindy Hsu Fung Advanced Practice Nurse Natio...
Author: Beverly McGee
8 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
The Impact of the Advanced Practice Nurse-led Critical Care Rounds on the Knowledge of ICU Nurses Ms CHUA Cindy Hsu Fung Advanced Practice Nurse National University Hospital, SINGAPORE 22 November 2013

Research Clinical Care Education

Outline • Describe the development of the critical care round • Identify initiatives to ensure sustainability of the critical care round • Evaluate the advanced practice nurse (APN)’s input on enriching the nurses’ knowledge

Background • Grand rounds are traditionally medical which are well recognized internationally and exist widely • Nursing Grand Rounds existed way back to 1980s • Based on Benner’s (1984) theoretical framework of skills acquisition – using 5 different levels from novice to expert • Studies have shown that the use of NGRs are means of continuing education and professional advancement

In general, its purpose…… Educate Engage the interprofessional team

Support undergraduate and post-graduate education

Grand Round Science and Medicine

Business Socialise

Exciting Happenings – Remodeling of Main Building

Background

• 1,068-bedded tertiary hospital and major referral center • 5 Intensive Care Units – 84 beds

• 2 High Dependency Units – 35 beds

Critical Care Round - Aims • To promote and demonstrate excellence in nursing • Provide opportunities for nurses to learn or expand their clinical knowledge base of practice • Provide the nurses a forum to share clinical expertise and the best of the nursing practice • Decrease staff isolation and promote professional development

Critical Care Round - Determinant

Achieve 50% of the AM shift nursing staff

Evolution

Pre-CCR Survey

2010

Inaugural CCR (Once every 2 months)

2011

Post-CCR Survey

2012

CCR (Monthly)

2013

Methodology • WHO – Nurse leaders, i.e. NM; NC; NE; APN – Registered nurses – Assistant nurses

• WHAT – Research studies, practice problems, issues and/or methodologies – Clinical case presentation of diagnoses or diseases – Best practices on selected interventions or care practices – Conference updates/HMDP experiences

Methodology • WHEN – 2nd Thursday of the month

• WHERE – Presentations held at Seminar Room (Hospital)

• HOW – PDF announcement emailed/provided to all nurse leaders for posting (1-2 weeks before)

Topics Presented FY2011 - 2013 Topics (2011)

Topics (2012)

Topics (2013)

Advancing Clinical Nursing

ICU Delirium and Assessment

Basic Clinical Microbiology I

Facts about HIV

Case Discussion: Acute Myocardial Infarction

Therapeutic Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest: A Nursing Perspective

Tracheostomy Care at a Glance

Case Discussion: Sepsis & Septic Shock

USA Learning Experience: HMDP

Daily Goal Setting: The Nursing Role

Case Discussion: Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Increasing the Chances of Obtaining Consent from Deceased Organ Donor

Role of Brain Death Coordinator

CRRT Conference 2012 Updates (San Diego)

Palliative & End-of-Life in Acute Care Settings

Role of a Transplant Coordinator

Heart Failure Workshop 2012 Updates (Singapore)

Singapore Trauma Conference Updates 2013 (TTSH)

Case Discussion: Community Acquired Pneumonia

Singapore Trauma Conference 2012 Updates (TTSH)

2nd Singapore-ANZICS Intensive Care Forum Updates 2013

National Teaching Institute (NTI) & Critical Care Exposition 2012 Updates (Orlando)

Serious Reportable Events (Nursing)

JBI Evidence-based Projects in ICU/HD (Chiangmai)

Nutritional Support in Critically Ill Patients

Clinical topics (APN)

Conference Updates

CCR Attendance Rate FY2011 – FY2013

Palliative & End-of-Life Care

Case Discussion: AMI

Adverse Events Reporting Advancing Clinical Nursing

Role of a TC Facts about HIV

Results

Results • Provides 1/5 of the continuing education hours granted yearly to the nurses • Provides education and networking for student nurses • Comments: “CCRs are beneficial with a good blend of theoretical and practical knowledge” “More case study discussions & pharmacological topics”

Results • Overall CCR survey average rating: – FY2011: 3.6 – FY2012: 3.8 (based on 4-point Likert Scale)

Evaluation of Nurses’ Knowledge

How did it sustain? • Frequency - Bi-monthly -> Monthly - 1 hour/session

• Publicity • •

CCR schedule with fixed date sent to all nurse leaders (beginning of the year) HMS reminders sent to all nurse leaders (actual day)

• Topics • •

More clinical and case study discussions by APNs PPT slides are uploaded to NHG Blackboard eLearning system 1 week after live presentation

Moving Forward • Increase participation from bedside clinical nurses • Engage other healthcare professionals, i.e. Doctors, Pharmacists, etc. • Peers and self evaluation of performance • Possible uploading of live presentation on eLearning system on top of the PPT slides

Suggest Documents