THE DEVELOPMENT OF NETWORK STRATEGIES IN AVIATION

THE DEVELOPMENT OF STRATEGIES IN AVIATION NETWORK Development of network strategies in Aviation Abstract The co...
1 downloads 2 Views 2MB Size








THE DEVELOPMENT OF STRATEGIES IN AVIATION





NETWORK

Development of network strategies in Aviation











Abstract The commercial aviation industry revolves around three fundamental pillars: political, economic and technological developments. Since the start of the jet age, these three pillars have affected the route system architecture that carriers fly. This paper investigates the shift in these three fundamental pillars over the past decade, comparing the operational characteristics of the point-to-point and hub-and-spoke route systems. It also emphasises the importance of recent developments in the commercial aviation industry, resulting in new opportunities for carriers to impact the route system architecture. In addition, a case study has been performed to display the new patterns of air service on long-haul networks – known as hub-bypassing. By applying this route strategy, carriers are able to operate a significant number of additional city-pairs that have been enabled by developments in the three fundamental pillars. This poses a threat to traditional hub-and-spoke carriers, which offer the same city-pairs, including an intermediate stop for connecting flights. However, hub-bypassing can also decrease congested airports and offer passengers faster and more non-stop flights between unique city-pairs.

Introduction

Since the liberalisation of air transport the skies have transformed into one single market, increasing city-pair connections. Airports and regional planners focus on primary airports (major hubs) associated with large cities (e.g. Schiphol/Amsterdam, Heathrow/London and Narita/Tokyo). Traditionally, carriers have concentrated all of their traffic into large markets, flying towards these primary airports where new flights connect passengers to their various destinations. This is known as the hub-and-spoke system. However, recent developments now mean that carriers are flying new routes, bypassing traditional hubs and stepping away from their traditional route architecture. The market has changed, and the industry is adjusting through three fundamental pillars that affect the development of network strategies: economic, political, and technological developments. As airlines connect cities, they are establishing new, highly profitable city-pairs that were first regarded as secondary markets. The importance of a liberal aviation industry is also now widely recognized, resulting in multilateral liberalisation. Correspondingly, new technological advancements have enabled manufacturers to build aircraft that allow carriers to open new long-haul routes and offer passengers the advantage of flying non-stop to their final destination rather than transferring via a major hub airport. To explore this new network strategy, a case study was performed comparing the route network of so-called hub-bypass systems and ‘traditional’ hub-and-spoke networks, in order to gain insight into the differences.



The fundamentals of commercial aviation The aviation industry can be found in practically every corner of the world, contributing to the world economy on a large scale. Three fundamental pillars affect the way carriers have developed their business model since the start of the jet age (the 1970s). The first is the political element. Before deregulation, technological innovations and governmental policies came before profitability and competition within the industry. The second is the economic element. Global economic growth in combination with urbanisation and increasing city size have resulted in more city-pairs. And third, the technological element. Technological advancements are important in this industry, and have allowed manufacturers to build new, advanced aircraft to meet the demands of carriers for long-haul city-pairs (Airline Industry Overview, 2014). Political Prior to deregulation, flag carriers were government owned, serving the public and political interests. The aviation system was based on a set of tight regulatory rules and restrictions. As a result, travellers were deprived of different price/service options. In 1978, the United States (US) reexamined their regulatory system and deregulated the aviation industry in the US (Goetz and Vowles 2009). The European Union (EU) followed the example of the US, and gradually deregulated the aviation industry in the 1980s and 1990s in Europe. By the end of 1995, the US had ‘open skies’ agreements with ten European countries. These agreements allowed services between any point in one country to any point in the other, with no restrictions as to the number of carriers or capacity. Today, the US has open skies agreements with more than 100 regions. However, the benefits of a liberal aviation are not only recognized in the US. Other examples include the Australia-New Zealand Single Aviation Market and the Multilateral Agreement on the Liberalization of International Air Transportation (MALIAT) between Brunei Darussalam, Chile, the Cook Islands, Mongolia, New Zealand, Samoa, Singapore, Tonga and the US

(Tretheway & Andriulaitis, 2015). The most recent example is the implementation of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) open skies policy (ASEAN Briefing, 2015). The EU and the ASEAN have agreed to start negotiations on an air transport agreement between both regions. “The agreement will be the first substantive accord between two major trading blocs, possibly providing an ‘open skies’ or ‘open aviation area’ arrangement with unlimited market access for both sides' airlines and other significant mutual benefits” (Tan, 2015, p.1). In the 1970s, the aviation industry was conservative and heavily regulated. We currently see a trend in which the benefits of a liberal aviation industry are widely recognized by more countries, as efforts are made to create policies that allows airlines to penetrate more markets with fewer restrictions. Economic In recent decades, the world’s population has undergone rapid urbanisation. This has resulted in a dominant urban population that exceeds the rural population (Figure 1).

Figure 1 : Global urban and rural population, 1950-2050.

It is expected that this level of urbanisation will increase globally. Africa and Asia are likely to take the lead, as major areas of these continents are still rurally populated. At the same time, global economic and population growth is forecasted to increase by 2050, leading to more metropolitan



Development of network strategies in Aviation





cities. This increase, in combination with global urban population growth, is propelled by the development of cities of all sizes (Figure 2, United Nations, 2014).

Figure 2 : Growth of cities of all sizes



The increase of new and larger cities is also triggered by factors such as liberalisation, consumer spending and the introduction of Low Cost Carriers (LCCs) opening new markets, making flying between cities more accessible for passengers. These factors have created a good environment for the growth of primary and secondary airports (Cain, 2015), stimulating network developments that connect more cities, increasing the number of city-pairs (Figure 3, IATA, 2011).

Figure 3: Network growth of city-pair connections









Passenger volumes are increasing annually, and airlines are starting to fly from and to secondary airports rather than major hubs (Neufville, 2003). A great example is Manchester airport, which was first known as a secondary airport but is now London Heathrow’s number one competitor (Hind, 2014). In 2008, Manchester airport was serving 25 million passengers annually. It is forecasted that by 2050, the airport will be handling a staggering 55 million passengers a year (UK aviation forecast, 2013). Continuous passenger growth and the rising number of new city-pairs will add more secondary airport connections, resulting in further local economic development (O’Conner and Fuellhart, 2015). Moreover, both secondary and primary airports will experience a significant growth in passenger movements due to the increase in regional city urbanization. Traffic is returning, oil prices have dropped and new business models are increasing the return of profitability (PWC, 2014). The next section will examine the high-profitability that enables airlines to fly these long-haul city-pairs from or to secondary airports. Technological The hub-and-spoke network has flourished around the world as a consequence of airline liberalization. This liberalization in the 1980s and 1990s saw a significant rise in the European share of transfer traffic at the major hub airports of Air France-KLM, British Airways and Lufthansa. Over time, however, these carriers did not realize the potential advantages of the hub-and-spoke network, and the lower unit cost of the hub-and-spoke operation was especially under pressure. The hubs of major European carriers have become congested over the years. The operating costs of large aircraft were higher than expected in comparison to smaller aircraft. Aircraft such as the B767/A330 were not able to operate on many city-pairs directly at sufficient margins. The increasing congestion at major hub airports demands a debate on patterns of air service (Morrell and Lu, 2007). The evolution of aircraft plays a vital role, by facilitating greater switching ability for airlines. This allows airlines to open new routes and offer the advantage of flying non-stop to their final destination rather than

Development of network strategies in Aviation





transferring via a major hub airport (Thelle, 2012). The Boeing 787, for example, is more fuel-efficient, reduces environmental impact and generates lower seat/kilometre costs (Figure 4). In the past, airlines were not able to profitably serve medium to long haul markets of low to medium density. Now, there are opportunities for a large number of profitable nonstop hub-bypass flights at a sufficient frequency (Boeing, 2015).







advantages when bringing relatively smaller aircraft into secondary airports with similar or improved ASM costs than those of larger aircraft (Figure 5).

Network strategies Hub-and-Spoke & Point-to-Point networks During deregulation, a considerable number of city-pairs were not costeffective due to underutilized flights authorized to protect domestic/regional airlines (Figure 6). This point-to-point network (Figure 7) required a sustainable economy and adequate passenger flow at origin and destination, both of which were not present during this period. Liberalization transformed the skies into one single market (Scharpenseel, 2001), which led carriers to start making use of a hub-and-spoke system (Figure 7).

Figure 5: Fuel cost per ASM (Source: AirInsight, 2012)

Figure 4: Aircraft fuel efficiency



As investigated by AirInsight (2012), the Boeing 787 brings advantages in terms of fuel cost per Available Seat Mile (ASM). This creates further

Figure 6: The three pillars of Aviation during the 1970s.





Development of network strategies in Aviation











This new route architecture allows carriers to feed passengers from secondary airports into a single airport (the ‘hub’). From this hub, new flights connect passengers to their various destinations (along the ‘spokes’). The goal of a hub-and-spoke route system is to ‘capture’ the passenger from origin to destination at a high profitably rate (Cook, 2008).

Figure 7: Route network illustrated



Hub-bypass Traditional European legacy carriers rely on the hub-and-spoke network model, because it offers advantages in terms of demand stimulation by providing a large variety of Origin & Destination (O&D) city pairs, including routes that could never be viable under direct operation (Bailey et al., 1986; Maertens, 2010). While these hubs have become essential to enable carriers to build a dominant market, the congestion that comes with the hubs’ sizes have encouraged carriers to grow their business through hubbypass strategies. These hub-bypass strategies emerged from the development of jets with enough range to link a substantial number of smaller city-pairs, enabling airlines to operate from and to niche markets (Clark, 2007). However, as depicted in Figure 8, non-European carriers operating flights to European cities can fly to secondary European airports, applying hub-bypass strategies (Maertens, 2010).

Figure 8: Current pillars of Aviation



Case study For this case study, a comparison of hub-bypass systems and ‘traditional’ hub-and-spoke networks has been created in order to gain insight into their differences. Carriers use primary and secondary airports in both network types. A primary airport is defined as an airport that carries 20% or more of the total passengers in that region. Secondary airports serve up to 20% of the passengers in their region (Bonnefoy; Neufville; & Hansman, 2008). The Boeing 787 Dreamliner was marketed as a ‘hub-buster’, enabling carriers to open new routes that would operate in thinner markets. It has been concluded that 20% of the routes operated by this aircraft are new routes. This does not mean that these routes could not have been opened with other aircraft types, but there are indications that the lower cost and smaller capacity are conducive for these routes (CAPA, 2014).



Development of network strategies in Aviation











The routes used for this case study are listed in Table 1 as either a hub-andspoke route or a hub-bypass route. These routes are not solely operated by Boeing 787s (Table 4).

2015; SFO Airport, 2015; OAK Airport, 2015). This percentage indicates that San José airport is a secondary airport in the region (Table 2).



Airport Annual (2014) SJC 9,600,000 OAK 10,336,788 SFO 46,191,454 Total: 66,128,242

O&D ADD-PVG BHX-JFK DUS-HND HND-BOS HND-SJC LAS-PEK LHR-AUS PEK-BOS PEK-SJC

Hub-bypass route ADD-PVG (ET) 788 BHX-JFK (AA) 752 DUS-HND (NH) 788 HND-BOS (JL) 788 HND-SJC (NH) 788 LAS-PEK (AA) 788 LHR-AUS (BA) 788 PEK-BOS (HU) 788 PEK-SJC (HU) 788

Hub-and-spoke network ADD-DOH-PVG (QR) 320 – 77W BHX-AMS-JFK (KL) F70 – 744 DUS-CDG-HND RJ85 – 777 HND-SFO-BOS (UA) 777 – 738 HND-LAX-SJC (DL) 777 – E175 LAS-YVR-PEK (AC) 319 – 77W LHR – DFW – AUS (BA – AA) 744 – MD80 PEK-DTW-BOS (DL) 744 – 320 PEK-SEA-SJC (DL) 763 – CRJ900

Table 1: Hub-bypass and hub-and-spoke routes

For this case study, the route provided by Hainan Airways (HU) from Beijing (PEK) to San José (SJC) is operated by a Boeing 787-8, and has been selected as an example (Figure 6). San José Airport is located within the Bay Area, in which San Francisco International Airport (SFO) and Oakland International Airport (OAK) are located (Ishii, Jun, van Dender, 2009). In terms of passenger numbers, San José airport accounts for 14.5% of all traffic within the region (SJC Airport,

pax Share (%) 14.5% 15.6% 69.9% 100%

Table 2: Airport passenger numbers

San Jose has two daily connections between Beijing (PEK) and San Francisco (SFO) by Air China (CA) and United Airlines (UA) and is also connected by Hainan Airways (HU). San José accounts for 14% of all available seats on flights between the Bay Area and Beijing (Table 3) (Flightmap Analytics, 2015).

Route: SFO-PEK SJC-PEK Total:

Seats/month 23,000 3,834 26,834

Share 86% 14% 100%

Table 3: Route seat numbers (July 2015).

Development of network strategies in Aviation





O&D EDI-HKT ZRH-BNE





Hub-bypass (airline) aircraft type EDI-DOH-HKT (QR) 788 – 788 ZRH-AUH-BNE (EY) 789 – 789



Traditional hub-and-spoke network aircraft type EDI-LHR-BKK-HKT(BA – PG) 763 – 77W – 320 ZRH-LHR-SIN-BNE (BA – QF) 321 – 77E – 332

Table 4: Hub-bypass and hub-and-spoke network hybrid

The routes in the table above are examples of connections that passengers can make due to hub-bypass strategy routes, with only one transfer compared to two transfers in the traditional hub-and-spoke network flights (Figure 10). Figure 9: Route comparison from PEK-SJC



Mayor Liccardo of San José has indicated that because San José lies in the heart of Silicon Valley and is the home of the worlds’ high-tech industry, it can facilitate business travel for the area’s multi-national companies (PR Newswire, 2015). These routes have either their origin or destination at a hub or primary airport (Maertens, 2010). This hub airport at either side of the connection provides connectivity to more destinations, and therefore more city-pairs. These pairs enable more connections for passengers with fewer transfers (Table 4). This type of routing creates a hybrid version of the hub-andspoke network and the hub-bypass network (Maertens, 2010). The three fundamental pillars of the aviation industry are developed in such a way that enables Hainan Airways to operate between Beijing (PEK) and San Jose (SJC). Political bilateral agreements between the People’s Republic of China and the US enable flight operation between the two countries. The economy has developed in both Beijing and San Jose. And technological advances in aircraft operating costs have enabled a viable operation between the two markets.

Figure 10: Route comparison



This figure shows that Qatar Airways operates directly to both Edinburgh, UK (EDI) and Phuket, TH (HKT). This bypassing of the main hubs of London Heathrow and Bangkok enables passengers to travel between EDI and HKT via Doha, Qatar (DOH).

Development of network strategies in Aviation



Conclusion The aviation industry has been characterized by its fundamental pillars which have been thriving since the 1970s: political, economic, and technological developments. Developments in all three of these areas have influenced the long-haul route architecture system of carriers. The benefits of a liberalized aviation industry are now widely recognized by more countries, and efforts have been made to create policies that allow airlines to penetrate more markets with fewer restrictions. We have seen an increase in the use of new and larger cities, triggered by factors as liberalisation, consumer spending and the introduction of LCCs. This has created a good environment for the growth of primary and secondary airports stimulating network developments, connecting more cities and increasing the number of city-pairs. At the same time, new types of aircraft have increased long-range capabilities and lowered seat per kilometre costs, enabling airlines to open new routes and achieve more profitability. This in turn has created new opportunities for a large number of profitable non-stop hub-bypass flights at a sufficient frequency. Airlines are discovering new, highly profitable long-haul routes with a low seat per kilometre cost, which enables carriers to shift to a market of economies of scale. Today’s passengers are offered more direct flights towards their final destination and shorter journey times. These recent developments bring opportunities for carriers applying the new the hub-bypass strategy – they have the advantage of directly operating on routes which were not viable in the past. However, this also poses a threat to competing, traditional huband-spoke carriers, who offer the same city-pairs with an intermediate connecting flight.

References

Air Canada. (2015). Fleet information. Retrieved 12/1, 2015, from https://www.aircanada.com/en/about/fleet/









Airbus (2013, winter). Airbus global market forecast – no author[Journal]. Retrieved from: http://www.atag.org/our-activities/social-a-economicbenefits-of-aviation.html AirFrance. (2015). Fleet information. Retrieved 12/1, 2015, from http://www.airfranceklm.com/en/fleet/long-haul?language=fr Airline Industry Overview (2004, winter). Airline Industry Overview – no author[Journal]. Retrieved from: http://web.mit.edu/airlines/analysis/analysis_airline_industry.html All Nippon Airways. (2015). Fleet information. Retrieved 12/1, 2015, from http://www.ana.co.jp/eng/aboutana/corporate/galleryclassi/index_sm.htm American Airlines. (2007). Basic measurements in the airline business. Retrieved 12/2, 2015, from https://www.aa.com/i18n/amrcorp/corporateInformation/facts/measurem ents.jsp American Airlines. (2015). Fleet information. Retrieved 12/1, 2015, from http://www.aa.com/i18n/aboutUs/ourPlanes/main.jsp ATAG (2015, winter). Social and economic benefits of Aviation – no author[Journal]. Retrieved from: http://www.atag.org/our-activities/sociala-economic-benefits-of-aviation.html Bailey, E. E., Graham, D. R., & Kaplan, D. P. (1986). Deregulating the airlines., 92. Bangkok Airways. (2015). Fleet information. Retrieved 12/1, 2015, from http://www.bangkokair.com/pages/view/our-fleet Boeing (2015, spring). Low-cost carrier business model [Journal]. Retrieved from: http://www.boeing.com/commercial/market/long-termmarket/airline-strategies-and-business-models/

Development of network strategies in Aviation



Boeing. (18/11/2015). Retrieved from http://www.boeing.com/commercial/787/#/design-highlights/exceptionalvalue/lower-fuel-consumption/ Bonnefoy, P. A., de Neufville, R., & Hansman, R. J. (2010). Evolution and development of multi-airport systems: A worldwide perspective.136(11), 1. British Airways. (2015). Fleet information. Retrieved 12/1, 2015, from http://www.britishairways.com/en-gb/information/about-ba/fleet-facts CAPA. (2014). 787 network analysis: 20% of dreamliner routes are new, others replace aircraft on existing routes. Retrieved 10-11-2015, 2015, from http://centreforaviation.com/analysis/787-network-analysis-20-ofdreamliner-routes-are-new-others-replace-aircraft-on-existing-routes176665 CityJet. (2015). Fleet information. Retrieved 12/1, 2015, from http://www.cityjet.com/about/our-fleet/ Clark, P. (2007). Size matters. Buying the big jets (2nd ed., pp. 19) Ashgate. Delta Air Lines. (2015). Fleet information. Retrieved 12/1, 2015, from http://www.delta.com/content/www/en_US/traveling-with-us/airportsand-aircraft/Aircraft/ Emirates Airline. (2015). Fleet information . Retrieved 12/1, 2015, from http://www.emirates.com/english/flying/our_fleet/our_fleet.aspx Etihad Airways. (2015). Fleet information. Retrieved 12/1, 2015, from http://www.etihad.com/en-us/experience-etihad/our-fleet/









Future schiphol (2013, october). Werken aan de toekomst van Schiphol en de regio – Schiphol group, KLM & LVNL [Journal]. Retrieved from: http://www.schiphol.nl/pdf/schiphol_samenleving/pp_deel_v1_m5657756 9830798229.pdf Gerald N. Cook (2008, winter). Airline Networks: A Comparison of Hub-and- Spoke and Point-to-Point SystemsAirline Networks: A Comparison of Huband-Spoke and Point-to-Point Systems [Journal]. Retrieved from: http://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1443&context=jaaer Gert Meijer (12-11-2015The future of the hub-system [PowerPoint]. Goedeking, P. (2010). Networks in aviation Springer. Goetz, A. R., & Vowles, T. M. (2009). The good, the bad, and the ugly: 30 years of US airline deregulation. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(4), 251-263. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.02.012 Hainan Airlines. (2015). Fleet information. Retrieved 12/1, 2015, from http://www.hainanairlines.com/HUPortal/dyn/portal/DisplayPage?COUNT RY_SITE=OEC&SITE=CBHZCBHZ&LANGUAGE=GB&PAGE=FLET Ishii, J., Jun, S., & van Dender, K. (2009). Air travel choices in multi-airport markets.65, 216. KLM. (2015). Fleet information. Retrieved 12/1, 2015, from https://www.klm.com/travel/nl_nl/prepare_for_travel/on_board/seating_ plans/index.htm long-haul markets. Research in Transportation Economics, 24(1), 68-74. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2009.01.009 Maertens, S. (2010). Drivers of long haul flight supply at secondary airports in europe.16(5), 239.

Development of network strategies in Aviation



Morrell, P., & Lu, C. (2007). The environmental cost implication of hub–hub versus hub by-pass flight networks. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 12(3), 143-157. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2007.01.008 O’Connor, K., & Fuellhart, K. (2015). The fortunes of air transport gateways. Journal of Transport Geography, 46, 164-172. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.06.013 Oakland International Airport. (2015). Facts & figures. Retrieved 12/2, 2015, from http://www.oaklandairport.com/airport_stats_yearend_stats.shtml Pearce, B. (2015). Economic performance of the airline industry IATA. Hainan airlines opens non-stop route from beijing to san jose, CA. San Jose: Hainan Airlines Co., LTD. PWC (2014, november). Airbus global market forecast – no author[Journal]. Retrieved from:https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/capital-projectsinfrastructure/publications/assets/pwc-connectivity-growth.pdf Qatar Airways. (2015). Fleet information. Retrieved 12/1, 2015, from http://www.qatarairways.com/global/en/our-fleet.page San Fransisco International Airport. (2015). Annual report 2014. San Fransisco: SFO. San José Airport. (2015). SJC factsheet No. 2015). San José: San José Airport. Scharpenseel (2001, spring). Consequences of E.U. Airline Deregulation in the Context of the Global Aviation Market- Moritz Ferdinand Scharpenseel [Journal]. Retrieved from:









http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?articl e=1543&context=njilb UK aviation forecast (2013). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_da ta/file/223839/aviation-forecasts.pdf United Nations (2014). http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Highlights/WUP2014-Highlights.pdf Schiphol (2013, 10). Economische positie – no author[Journal]. Retrieved from: http://www.schiphol.nl/InDeSamenleving/ToekomstSchiphol/Economie.ht m Thelle, M. H., (2012). Airport competition in Europe . Copenhagen Economics. United Airlines. (2015). Fleet information. Retrieved 12/1, 2015, from https://www.united.com/web/en-US/content/travel/inflight/aircraft/ Wensveen, J. (2011). Air transportation: A management perspective (7th ed.) Ashgate Publishing Company. Tretheway, M., & Andriulaitis, R. (2015). What do we mean by a level playing field in international aviation? Transport Policy, 43, 96-103. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.05.007 Tan, A. K. (2015). The proposed E.U.-ASEAN comprehensive air transport agreement: What might it contain and can it work? Transport Policy, 43, 7684. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.05.009 ASEAN Briefing. (2015). ASEAN open skies policy to be implemented in 2015. Retrieved from

Development of network strategies in Aviation



http://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/2015/01/02/asean-open-skies-policyimplemented-2015.html Bob Cain 2015 “Tourism futures international” Retrieved 12/2, 2015, from http://www.preparingfortakeoff.com.au/wpcontent/uploads/2015/05/Robert-Cain-Tourism-FuturesInternational_Presentation-1May2015.pdf Peter Hind 2014 “The optimal size of a UK hub airport” Retrieved 12/2, 2015, from http://www.theitc.org.uk/docs/113.pdf Richard de Neufville 2003 “The future of secondary airports” Retrieved 12/2,2015,from http://ardent.mit.edu/airports/ASP_papers/Cahiers%20S%20du%20Transp ort%20English%2005--%20Neufville.pdf Image references (top to bottom, left to right) 1 Cover – Jeffrey Schäfer 2 Boeing – Fuel efficiency of aircraft 3 Gert Meijer – Fundamentals of Aviation

Dutch Summary

De luchtvaartindustrie draait om drie fundamentele elementen: politieke, economische en technologische ontwikkelingen. Deze ontwikkelingen beïnvloeden het routesysteem dat luchtvaartmaatschappijen vliegen. Na deregulatie waren luchtvaartmaatschappijen in staat om actief de concurrentie met elkaar aan te gaan en meer markten te penetreren met minder restricties. Een grote invloed hierop heeft de introductie van ‘NextGeneration’ vliegtuigen die de operationele en reikwijdte van luchtvaartmaatschappijen verbeterden. In 2011 introduceerde Boeing de 787 als een ‘hub-buster’ die het mogelijk maakte om non-stop routes te









openen en de vraag voor hubs verminderde. Luchtvaartmaatschappijen bieden in groeiende hoeveelheden lijnvluchten aan naar secundaire steden en ‘by-passen’ daarmee hubs en versterken daarmee hun eigen hub. De introductie van efficiëntere vliegtuigen in relatie tot de economische groei en urbanisatie kan nieuwe kansen creëren voor luchtvaartmaatschappijen om met directe vluchten te opereren naar kleinere markten in plaats van het verbinden met een hub. This is a Luchtvaartfeiten.nl / AviationFacts.eu publication. Authors: Thomas Berntsen, Jeffrey Schäfer, Hares Wardak Editorial staff: R.J. de Boer PhD Msc, G. Boosten MSc & G.J.S. Vlaming MSc Copying texts is allowed. Please cite: ‘Luchtvaartfeiten.nl (2016), Development of Network Strategies in Aviation Fact sheet, www.luchtvaartfeiten.nl’ Luchtvaartfeiten.nl is an initiative by the Aviation Academy at the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (HvA). Students and teachers share knowledge with politicians and the general public to ensure that discussions are based on facts May 2016

Suggest Documents