THE DEREGULATED TEXAS ELECTRICITY MARKET

THE DEREGULATED TEXAS ELECTRICITY MARKET March 4, 2016 www.velaw.com RECENT HISTORY OF TEXAS ELECTRICITY MARKET 1999 – 2015 2005: • S.B. 20 passed...
Author: Guest
9 downloads 4 Views 2MB Size
THE DEREGULATED TEXAS ELECTRICITY MARKET March 4, 2016

www.velaw.com

RECENT HISTORY OF TEXAS ELECTRICITY MARKET 1999 – 2015

2005: • S.B. 20 passed • Expanded RPS goal of 5,880 MW by 2015 and a target of 10,000 MW by 2025 • Established CREZ

1999: • S.B. 7 passed • Deregulated TX electricity market • Established RPS

2002: • S.B. 7 implemented with RPS goal of 2,880 MW by 2009; beginning of retail competition

2007: • TX surpassed expanded 2015 RPS goal

2006: • ERCOT completes its CREZ study

2010-2013: • CREZ projects proceed; route segments selected

2009: • TSPs selected to build CREZ

2008: • PUCT approved $5B CREZ transmission project • GE Energy delivers its report, “Analysis of Wind Generation Impact on ERCOT” • ERCOT finalizes CREZ transmission optimization study

2010: • TX surpassed expanded 2025 RPS goal • CREZ line construction began

2015: • TX sets alltime record for wind energy production (13.9 GW)

2013: • Final CREZ line construction completed

CREZ: Competitive Renewable Energy Zones ERCOT: Electric Reliability Council of Texas PUCT: Public Utility Commission of Texas RPS: Renewable Portfolio Standard TSP: Transportation Service Provider Confidential and Proprietary ©2016 Vinson & Elkins LLP www.velaw.com

2

S.B. 20 (2005) THE BEGINNING OF CREZ

Confidential and Proprietary ©2016 Vinson & Elkins LLP www.velaw.com

3

IDENTIFY AREAS OF HIGHEST WIND POTENTIAL PUC PROJECT NO. 33577

Source: PUCT Confidential and Proprietary ©2016 Vinson & Elkins LLP www.velaw.com

4

CREZ OPTIONS 25 DIFFERENT ZONES

Source: ERCOT Confidential and Proprietary ©2016 Vinson & Elkins LLP www.velaw.com

5

CREZ DESIGNATION PUC DOCKET NO. 33672

Source: PUCT Confidential and Proprietary ©2016 Vinson & Elkins LLP www.velaw.com

6

CREZ TRANSMISSION LINES

Source: PUCT Confidential and Proprietary ©2016 Vinson & Elkins LLP www.velaw.com

7

SELECTION OF TRANSMISSION LINES PUC DOCKET NO. 35665

Source: PUCT Confidential and Proprietary ©2016 Vinson & Elkins LLP www.velaw.com

8

THE CREZ PROCESS WAS A NEW PROCESS



Typically, transmission is built from generation or to load when there are no lines or when current lines get congested.



Designating the zones and building transmission before the generation is in place is the reverse of what normally happens; removes “the chicken or the egg” problem.



PURA 39.904(h) – In reviewing CREZ CCN applications, “need” should not be considered.



The PUC approved different transmission providers to build the CREZ lines to encourage new market participants rather than rely exclusively on incumbent TSPs.



New TSPs awarded projects in Panhandle of West Texas, as well as “non-priority projects.”

Confidential and Proprietary ©2016 Vinson & Elkins LLP www.velaw.com

9

TRANSMISSION LINE APPROVAL PROCESS



Under PURA, the PUC must consider factors such as the community, historical, and aesthetic values, and the environmental integrity associated with the transmission line.



Additional factors in PUC rules are whether the routes:

– utilize existing compatible rights-of-way, including the use of vacant positions on existing multiple -circuit transmission lines; – parallel existing compatible rights-of-way; – parallel property lines or other natural or cultural features; and – conform with the policy of prudent avoidance. •

Utilities must apply to the PUC for a certificate of convenience and necessity (CCN) before it can build a power line.



Originally, TSPs provided the PUC with a “preferred route” and two alternate routes, but unintended consequences led to elimination of the “preferred route” requirement



After transmission lines were selected, the TSPs had to apply for a CCN, which gives utilities the power of eminent domain to obtain the use of private property easements for the power lines. Confidential and Proprietary ©2016 Vinson & Elkins LLP www.velaw.com

10

WIND ENERGY IN TEXAS 2005 – 2015 (MWH PER YEAR)

45,000,000 40,786,278

40,000,000 36,142,384

35,000,000

32,705,373 29,803,361

30,000,000

28,295,402 24,713,265

25,000,000 20,000,000

18,809,812 15,237,876

15,000,000 10,000,000

8,732,934 6,341,451

5,000,000

3,977,038

0

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Source: ERCOT Confidential and Proprietary ©2016 Vinson & Elkins LLP www.velaw.com

11

U.S. WIND POWER CAPACITY INSTALLATIONS, BY STATE FOURTH QUARTER 2015

Source: American Wind Energy Association | U.S. Wind Industry Fourth Quarter 2015 Market Report Confidential and Proprietary ©2016 Vinson & Elkins LLP www.velaw.com

12

TEXAS ENERGY USE COMPARISON 2003, 2009, & 2014

Nuclear 11.95%

Coal 39.72%

Wind 0.83%

Wind 6.2%

Hydro, Biomass, Solar, Other 1.15% Natural Gas 46.35%

Nuclear 13.6%

Coal 36.6%

Wind 10.6%

Hydro, Biomass, Solar, Other 1.5%

Nuclear 11.6% Natural Gas 42.1%

Hydro, Biomass, Solar, Other 0.8% Natural Gas 41.1%

Coal 36%

Energy Use 2003

Energy Use 2009

Energy Use 2014

Total energy consumed: 279,373,420 MWh

Total energy consumed: 305,432,222 MWh

Total energy consumed: 340,033,353 MWh

Source: ERCOT Public Confidential and Proprietary ©2016 Vinson & Elkins LLP www.velaw.com

13

TEXAS ENERGY USE 2015

Wind 11.7%

Hydro, Biomass, Solar, Other 0.5%

Nuclear 11.3% Natural Gas 48.3% Coal 28.1%

Energy Use 2015 Total Energy Consumed: 347,522,948 MWh Source: ERCOT Public Confidential and Proprietary ©2016 Vinson & Elkins LLP www.velaw.com

14

SPEAKER BIOGRAPHY

Barry is the only person to ever serve on both the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) and the Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC), and is a nationally recognized authority on a number of emerging energy trends. With this background, Barry brings unique experience and perspective when advising clients on issues relating to state and federal regulations, energy project development, legislative matters, and energy litigation.

BARRY T. SMITHERMAN PARTNER

512.542.8562 [email protected]

Barry Smitherman @smithermanTX

Barry’s experience at the PUCT and RRC, coupled with his service on a number of national and regional energy-focused boards and committees, gives him particular insight into emerging developments such as unconventional oil and gas development, electric transmission development, renewable energy generation, and energy storage. Barry was appointed to the RRC in 2011 to serve an unexpired term and, in 2012, was elected statewide for a two-year term. He was later chosen by his colleagues to serve as chairman of the RRC. During his chairmanship, he also served as chair of the Gas Committee of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners from 2013 to 2014.

Prior to his service with the RRC, Barry was a member of the PUCT for more than seven years and served as chairman of the agency for most of 2007 to 2011. In addition to a number of significant achievements, Barry is best known for leading the PUCT’s adoption and management of the 3,600-mile Competitive Renewable Energy Zone transmission line project, handling routing disputes and acting as the agency’s liaison with the Texas Legislature, service providers, and landowners. Prior to beginning public service, Barry spent 16 years as an investment banker. He held leadership positions with several firms, including Lazard, where he led the Houston office; The First Boston Corporation, where he was co-head of the “sunbelt infrastructure” group; J.P. Morgan Securities, where he was head of Texas public finance; and Banc One Capital Markets, where he was the National Head of tax-exempt origination. During this time, he managed billions in municipal bond offerings on behalf of state and local governments.

Confidential and Proprietary ©2016 Vinson & Elkins LLP www.velaw.com

15

THANK YOU 512.542.8562

[email protected]

www.velaw.com

T +971.2.412.0700

Austin T +1.512.542.8400

Beijing T +86.10.6414.5500

Dallas T +1.214.220.7700

Dubai T +971.4.330.1800

Hong Kong T +852.3658.6400

Houston T +1.713.758.2222

London T +44.20.7065.6000

Moscow T +7.495.544.5800

New York T +1.212.237.0000

Palo Alto T +1.650.687.8200

Riyadh T +966.11.250.0800

San Francisco T +1.415.979.6900

Tokyo T +81.3.3282.0450

Washington T +1.202.639.6500

Confidential and Proprietary ©2016 Vinson & Elkins LLP www.velaw.com Confidential and Proprietary ©2016 Vinson & Elkins LLP www.velaw.com

16

Suggest Documents