The competitive strength of the Danish milk production from a Global and EU perspective Preben Mikkelsen Danish Cattle Federation
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Danish Cattle Federation The Global milk production structure The political framework in EU The future of milk quota in EU Future challenges and possibilities Competitive strength of Danish milk production 7. Concluding remarks
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
1. Danish Cattle Federation
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
The Danish Cattle Federation The Danish Cattle Federation is a unifying body working to improve specific conditions of cattle farming and being the spokesman of cattle farmers and we work to z
Ensure the best possible earnings for cattle farmers
z
Optimise the industry by a plough to plate approach and viewing the industry as a whole
z
Organise service, advising and control assignments
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
The Danish Cattle Federation – stands on three legs • Cattle and industrial policy • Primary production and advising • Veterinary conditions and primary product quality
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
Danish Cattle Federation Objective: Being the most competitive European cattle industry as regards economy, sustainability and quality Danish Cattle Federation is formed by: Danish Agriculture (the national farmers’ organisation) A.I. Centre Dansire Danish Dairy Board Danish Meat Board
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
2. The Global milk production structure
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
The largest milk producing countries of the world 140.000
132.250
Metric tonnes
120.000 100.000 82.250
80.000 60.000 39.450
40.000
32.000
33.800
7.750
10.285
Mexico
20.000
Canada
24.680 13.800
10.300
8.210
5.700
10.750
14.100
North America
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
South America
Europe
Former South Soviet Asia Union
Asia
New Zealand
Australia
Japan
China
India
Ukraine
Russia
Romania
EU 25
Brazil
Argentina
United States
0
Oceania
The biggest players on the world market 1990
2004 Others 17%
Others 24%
EU 40%
New Zealand 23% Australia 7%
USA 6%
Argentina 3%
New Zealand 33%
EU is loosing market shares to Oceania! EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
EU 35%
USA 2% Australia 10%
Farm structure around the world
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
Milk price around the world (2004)
22
32
Milk price in US-$ / 100 kg milk
Source: IFCN Dairy Report 2005, national statistics, estimations
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
> 40 30-40 25-30 20-25 < 20
Costs of producing milk around the world ? ?
Cost of milk production in US-$ / 100 kg milk > 40 30 - 40 20 - 30 Source: IFCN Dairy Report 2005
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
15 - 20 700 cows: 2,500$
3. The political framework in EU
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
Reform of the milk policy Quotas: z Extension of the quota system until 2014/15 z 3 x 0.5% quota increase in Denmark from 2006/07-2008/09 Prices: z Reduction of the intervention price – butter: 3x7% in 2004, ’05 and ’06 + 4% in 2007 – SMP: 3x5% in 2004-2006 z Intervention ceiling of 70,000 t for butter in 2004/05 dropping to 30,000 t in 2008/09 Compensation: z Partial compensation for the reduction of intervention prices z Decoupling in Denmark in 2005
05.08.2003
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
EU-enlargement – Bulgaria and Romania from 2007 ? Milk-reform
Quota system + 1,5% increase
CAP-reform
WTO I
WTO II
EU-budget – 2013 (financial discipline)
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
Political perspectives 2015
Price pressure New markets
Milk price -22% 50% compensation Decoupling Modulation
Export refunds eliminated Increased market access Reduction in subsidies
4. The future of milk quotas in EU
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
Market balance in EU28
130
120
120
110
110
100
100
90
90
- Quota: +0,5% p.a.*
80
80
70
70
- Imports: 2.5% of comsumption p.a. in 2006/07 rising to 5% p.a. in 2012-2015
60
60
Exports Sales EU
Mio. tons
Milk deliveries + imports Milk deliveries Prognosis 2006-2015: - Consumption in EU: +1% p.a.
- Exports: 13.5 mio. tons p.a. falling to 10 mio. tons in 2013-2015
20 14
20 12
130
20 10
140
20 08
140
20 06
150
20 04
150
20 02
160
20 00
160
19 98
Mio. tons
To ensure the good balance
* Quota increase not included for B, F, GR, LUX, AUST, FIN, SW and U.K.
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
The market and the quota The expected market development leaves room for a gradual, annual quota enlargement of 0.5-1% with a continued market balance – should be evaluated on an annual basis dependent on the development.
Impact: • Preparation for termination of the quota system • Gives certain possibilities for competitive countries • It is expected that Denmark will utilize the quota increase – an increase will have a minor, calming impact on the quota price • Countries not utilizing the quota, will have no negative impact EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
Future of the quota system Several countries discuss termination of the quota system It ”simply” calls for a blocking minority (90 seats) to terminate quotas (Sweden, Denmark, U.K., Italy and Poland)
Requirements up to 2015: • flexibility • gradual phasing out / gradual increase of quota • clear signal in due time
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
Is it realistic to give up milk quotas? YES! z
If the Council of Ministers does not decide otherwise, the milk quota system will be abolished by 2015. An extension requires the EU Commission to put forward a proposal.
z
A blocking minority may secure that the present quota system is not extended.
z
90 votes out of 321 form a blocking minority: I.e. Great Britain, Italy, Poland, and Denmark may together block a proposal.
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
5. Future challenges and possibilities
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
Challenges and countermoves The challenges – Lower milk price – Less economic support – Stricter environmental regulations – More focus on animal welfare
The countermove of the dairy farmer – Cost minimization – Increase in farm size – Exploitation of new technological advances and new knowledge – Focus on strategy, leadership and management EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
New knowledge and new technology Better machinery
Better feeding equipment
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
Better housing facilities
Better milking systems
New knowledge and new technology Better genetic
Better ”chemistry” • Plant protection • Fertilizers • Medicine
More knowledge • More knowledge regarding • Feeding of cows • Management of heifers • Roughage-growing • More and better knowledge of usage of technology
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
Technology will monitor the herd Health and reproduction
Feed uptake
Health and reproduction
The registrations are converted into useful information EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
The role of the farmer is changing From • Doing all the farm work – – – –
From
Milking Feeding Field work Monitoring the herd
To • Strategy formulation • Management of production and economy • Management of labor • “Management” of consultants • Monitoring the herd by use of technology EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
Skilled craftsman
To Manager and leader
Trends for the coming years regarding ownership From
To
The family farm
C Cr. The family farm
S
The network
The limited company EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
Trends for the coming years – the production system From
To
An fully integrated unit
Out sourcing
A fully integrated unit
Consisting of individual units EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
The role of the advisor is changing The traditional role • Specialist on specific subjects such as: Feeding, animal health, economy etc. • Treatment of sick animals • The recipient of the advice is the dairy farmer • Little communication between the different advisors • Little focus on the farm as a whole • Knowledge and advisory tools are very
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
The new role • Technology takes over much of the registration on the farm • Due to technology diseases can be identified at an earlier stage • Prevention of diseases • Specialist and discussion partner • The recipient of the advice could be several people on the farm • More focus on the farm as a whole • The advisor acts in a team of advisors • Knowledge and advisory tools are important but so are collaboration and communication skills • Sharing knowledge
6. Competitive strength of the Danish milk production
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
Net capital and liabilities Denmark
Sweden Norway Finland
Netherlands Germany France Spain U.K. Ireland Poland Hungary
USA Brasil Kina Australia New Zealand
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Net capital
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
60%
70%
Liabilities
80%
90%
100%
Structural development: Increase in cows p.a. (1996-2003) Average number of cows per holding 86
Denmark
45 17 19
Sweden Norway Finland
65 39 38 28 81 46 4 17
Netherlands Germany France Spaion U.K. Ireland Poland Hungary
117 16
USA Brazil
229 316
Australia New Zealand 0
2
4
6 Per cent
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
8
10
12
Labour productivity (Kilo milk/hour) Denmark
Sweden Norway Finland
Netherlands Germany France Spain U.K: Ireland Poland Hungary
USA Brasil China Australia New Zealand
0
50
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
100
150
200
250 Kilo milk/hour
300
350
Danish milk production International competitiveness Structure:
6.8% annual increase in farm sizes
Working productivity:
Only exceeded by NZ and Australia. High wages, but welleducated, efficient and ready for readjustments
Debt ratio:
75% = top achievement, but result is a high investment level = geared for international competition
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
Investments on dairy farms
Investments, DKK per cow
7000 6000
Quota exchange introduced
5000 4000 3000 2000 1000
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
04 20
03 20
02 20
01 20
00 20
99 19
98 19
97 19
96 19
95 19
19
94
93 19
19
92
0
Earnings on farms with dairy cattle Operating result, 1,000 DKK
No of cows per farm
300
120 100
250
80
200 60 150 40
100 50
20
0
0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005* * Provisional result based on 1/3 of the accounts.
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
No of cows per farm
Operating result, 1000 DKK
350
Milk price paid to the producer 4.2% fat and 3.4% protein
DKK/100 kg 260
255
256
255 251
250
249
247
245
246 246
244
240
241 236
235 230
227
225
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
04/05
03/04
02/03
01/02
00/01
99/00
98/99
97/98
96/97
95/96
94/95
220
Milk price paid to the producer in other countries DKK per 100 kg (4.2% fat and 3.4% protein) Year
DK
FIN
FR
NL
UK
DE
PL
US
NZ
2001
255
263
241
255
233
256
166
290
140
2002
256
266
233
241
206
233
147
218
120
2003
251
266
230
230
198
222
130
188
116
2004
236
260
222
224
206
218
150
225
135
2005
227
256
216
221
204
216
178
210
133*
1
Change in 2005 compared to 2004, percentage in DKK
-4%
-2%
-3%
-2%
-1%
-1%
+18%
-7%
-1%
in nat’l currency
-4%
-2%
-3%
-2%
-1%
-1%
+5%
-6%
-5%
Note:
1) The Danish prices are October year prices * Estimated prices
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
Cause of improvement of the operating result z
Productivity progress more than equals the price reduction
z
Milk allowance
z
Falling animal feed prices and a satisfactory harvest of coarse fodder
z
High beef prices
z
Fall in taxes of tenancies
z
New accounting method
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
7. Concluding remarks
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
Some concluding remarks • The surrounding environment of the dairy farms in the EU is changing – Milk price is decreasing and the income of the farms is under pressure – Economic support to farmers is likely to decrease – Decoupling of support from production changes the competitiveness of the dairy farms EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
Some concluding remarks • The likely countermove of the dairy farmers – Lowering the cost of production – Structural development and larger farms – Investment in technology – A change from craftsman to manager/leader EDF Congress 2006, Denmark
If you prepare and change focus from support to the market – there will be a bright future for the European milk producer.
EDF Congress 2006, Denmark