The Clear Choice for Advanced. Wound Care

The Clear Choice for Advanced Wound Care MPM Wound & Skin Cleanser Non-toxic – Contains Poloxamer 188 Used to: • Remove particulate matter & other...
Author: Cody Anderson
3 downloads 2 Views 2MB Size
The Clear Choice for Advanced Wound Care

MPM Wound & Skin Cleanser Non-toxic – Contains Poloxamer 188 Used to:

• Remove particulate matter & other debris from dermal wounds without harming living tissue Directions: Spray wound & surrounding area. Allow time for debris to soften. Adjust nozzle to “STREAM” to loosen debris. Adjust nozzle to “SPRAY” to gently flush debris from wound bed. No rinsing necessary.

Product #

Size

Pkg.

MPM Wound & Skin Cleanser

MP00030

16 oz. Spray Bottle

6/Cs.

MPM Wound & Skin Cleanser

MP00031

8 oz. Spray Bottle

9/Cs.

Specifications: 

16 oz

Spray can be adjusted

Ph Range 6.8 to 7.5 PSI 5.8 to 6.2 (Depends on distance)

8 oz

MPM Antiseptic Wound & Skin Cleanser

MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus) • VRE (Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus)

Used to:

• Clean superficial wounds • For washing small superficial wounds • Aids in removal of foreign material such as dirt and debris • First-aid Benefits:

• Nonirritating • Does not delay wound healing

Directions:

• Spray on infected area up to three times daily. • May be covered with sterile bandage. • If bandaged, let dry first so bandage will not adhere.

8 oz

Product #

Size

Pkg.

MPM Antiseptic Wound Cleanser

MP00032

8 oz. Spray Bottle

9/Cs.

MPM Antiseptic Wound Cleanser

MP00034

2 oz. Spray Bottle

24/Cs.

2

2 oz spray

Specifications:

Ph Range 6.8 to 7.5 PSI 5.8 to 6.2 (Depends on distance) – standard 4 to 15

8 0 0 . 2 3 2 . 5 5 1 2 • W W W. M P M M E D . C O M • A D VA N C E D W O U N D C A R E

Have a wound that won't heal? Try Triple Helix Collagen DRESSINGS

Indications*: This product is cleared for the intended use in the management of the following: • Burns • Sores • Blisters • Scrapes • Ulcers • Other Wounds Directions for use: • Cleanse wound with MPM Wound and Skin Cleanser. • Apply sheet, may be trimmed to size. • Apply powder approximately ¼" thick, do not pack. • Cover with a non-adherent dressing. • Repeat daily or as indicated.

Product #

HCPC

Size

Pkg.

MPM Triple Helix Collagen Dressing

MP00310 A6021

2” x 2” 1 Sheet/Pch., Sheet 5 Pchs. per Bag, 10 Bags/Cs.

MPM Triple Helix Collagen Powder

MP00311 A6010

1 Gram Pouch

1 Gram/Pch. 5 Pchs. per Bag, 10 Bags/Cs.

MPM Triple Helix Collagen Rope

MP00312 A6024

12” Rope

1 Rope/Pch., 5 Pchs. per Bag, 10 Bags/Cs.

8 0 0 . 2 3 2 . 5 5 1 2 • W W W. M P M M E D . C O M • A D VA N C E D W O U N D C A R E

3

Lid Co oc nt ai ai n e ns HC l2 %

MPM Regenecare

®

Wound Care Gel

Amorphous hydrogel dressings proven to reduce pain intensity without side effects 1 Proven to reduce both pain and itching in cross-over study 2

A crossover clinical study of sixty patients with painful deep wounds showed use of a hydrogel containing 2% Lidocaine-HCI and collagen as a contact layer was significant in alleviating dressing-related pain. – Brad Pontani, M.D., FAAFP, CWS

1

A Cross Over Clinical Study of Sixty Patients with Painful contaiRegenecare vera ns 2% Hydrog Deep Wounds Showed Use of a Hydrogel Containing as a natextract (highlidocaine-elHC (MPM Me shown ura l hum molecula l in a dical Inc bas r we 2% Lidocaine-HCl and Collagen as Contact Layer was istime andtoactincrease ectant and e of . Irvi ight ng, fibrob a saf mo compon concen Tex as Significant in Alleviating Dressing Related Pain. Regto enhanceeand effectaniveanti-inlasflat migratistuionrizer. Aloente s) andtracolted aloas)e

Introduction In recent years there has the

experience been growing enecar wound vera lagen ane mmato , enh of living with evidence app sthetic has impact on e Hyd ry. 5,6,7 anc that a chronic rep rov a patient’s wound has . 8,9 Col Lid e wound been rogel air me wound ed for quality of ocaine pain in wound repair life. The signific a huge s and the ma is an chanis lagen healing is HC ms has much neglecte ance of against pain scrape nagem FDA bee l (2%) management d because registe in the s, and ent of biases of available epi n sho ts in general 1st of pressu red Me dermis wn , a lack of analgesics The and and difficult knowledge measurement. 1 . 10,11 from pain sco 2nd re ulc dical ies associa In a study describi ers, Dev deg ted with pain ice with a leg the two rela res were ree sup ng patients ulcer, pain burns. erficia sam 22nd Annual Symposium on Advanced Wound Care and Wound Healing Society, April 2009 ted ’ experiences was sam reported Match e sub found to be characteristic l ple the most overwhe living of the conditio Sign ed Pai ject). The s (as and eva activities n and was lming Test. rs wit of daily living data a before luated exacerbated and were h during by such . patients we healing, inflammation, and diameter assessed Introduction: Pain management during wound dressing simple Sig The straig The and as walking se re are concern or standin ht for nonpar ned Ra analyze after scores The ed and worried wound as g. nks evalua were dressing changes. changes improves quality of life, patient compliance and am wa d well. 2 .00000 Sign about healing Most Regen Test rd in the etric tes test (MP using the tion of the The United on Since 0156. can ease anxiety. A pain relieving gel with aloe extract to eca States House The (Chi Squ ir interp ts were SR) and Wilcox re the “Nation Reg notheimprovement Wil to 8 levels in of Represe retati consid are als al Pain Care Male Applica Results: Pain scores varied from reduce inflammation, marine collagen as a humectant and ene se results cox ntatives enacted in MP of= on. tio ered o the address current amoun care Policy (37 Regenecare SR tes 21.511 Hyd are yr.) n Reduc robust very during issues in health Act of 2007” in order pain relief with the use of 2% lidocaine-HCl provides pain relief and an environment Application had t relieving rog hydrogel with Issues ) chathe pain Reduces Pain pai to Female (60 care and pain nge when app el red highly sig t resulte resulte Pyo es Paaddress s. of patients assessed Score yr.) with derma in Sco ed were “pain Pai n levels dressing changes. Ninety percent conducive to stimulating healing. The pain relieving gel was management. (Patien lied uces pai thenifican d in p d in misdiag is often t refused dressin Calciphylaxis and from 10 to 3 in nosed,remistrea p sub n manag of zer < gan n by as t, it Conclexperienced during dressing Renal Failure sta grenosfrom 8 ted or undertre improperly assesse o a con g change if is con 6.94x1 -18 < hydrogel as relieving pain change. used as an adjuvant to standard wound treatment protocols a usion d, the contain ntially ement before care professionals Regenecare ated, and cluded 0 . tact very hig um aretoinadequ 1 in issue of wound not applied many health Pain using dur andassessm hly s lido reduce layer The mean pain reliefreliscores Regenecare hydrogel showed which consisted of wound dressings (foams, debriders, sup tha after ent, diagnos ately trained ) European Wound pain as evidenced ef wit scores during significan t out porting caine, d wit ing dre usi in is, the proper treatment by the involvem The ha varied to no hydrogel use. Management Act ng ssing 4.5 levels of painNin reduction collagen, alginates, silver dressings, packing, etc.) selected and manage a mo col com alsothe stated ent of the dressi t the dedicati the compared ety h as e. ment of pain.” from gel ist wou lagen topica that “improv use on of a supplem Association Position cha educati ng experie per Gow l no imp with use nge . ing pain Statistical evaluation of cen pain score for individual wounds. access, of differences Docume to this topic, ent in Ostomy nd env and oth pain on, and s can care reduce land et care reli research scores nced t of pat Regene rovem of are nationa Wound Manage nt, erthe United eving iron , at Wound and the Consensus l health care of Regenecare controldur analyzedienby the car Sign and d pai al., rep ment ment importa States.” Document e durTestent(Chi painvs. usi gel 3 be Dressing Procedu priorities ng Reg ing dre ts ass to 8 Pain 2 cut n and orted on Minimiz nt for assessm tha essedPairs ing Rec ing Pain of Wound ssing res launche optimi ingent comby theeneWilcoxin Square = 21.511) Matched Signed Methods: Sixty subjects (ages 20 to 91) with painful venous Three asand toolst such dressi levels of redien eptor aneous itching in a clin Healing the d car par at as cha the World zin Societies meeting the Numeric patien pai pruriti ng gel ed to e Hyd ical Inhibit toxicit g hea ts exists across for Union al Rating Scale Ranks Test both showed p