The BIM Balancing Act

The BIM Balancing Act buildingSMART Summit Week in Denmark David M. Hammond, RLA, APA Senior Program Manager Office of Civil Engineering United Stat...
Author: Ralf French
10 downloads 0 Views 4MB Size
The BIM Balancing Act

buildingSMART Summit Week in Denmark

David M. Hammond, RLA, APA Senior Program Manager Office of Civil Engineering United States Coast Guard The USCG is a sponsor/member of the buildingSMARTallianceTM A Council of the National Institute of Building Sciences

København – 6‐10 September, 2010

Anne Christine Sorensen • Born in København • 1882 • 1882 to 1973

Grandmother

The BIM Balancing Act Organizational Change

Enabling  Technology

Processes

Strategic Thinking 08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

3

Products of Strategic Thinking • Link Facilities to  Missions/Outcomes • Centralized Resource  Decision‐making • Distributed Execution • Asset & Portfolio Mgmt • Fact‐Based, Repeatable,  & Verifiable Decision‐ making 08 September 2010

• Total Cost of Ownership • Total Asset Visibility • Configuration  Management • Bi‐Level Maintenance • Product Line  Management

Copyright© 2010  USCG

4

Strategic Elevator Speech • • • •

08 September 2010

Mission Focused Info‐Centric Change Oriented Requirements Driven

Copyright© 2010  USCG

5

Linking Facilities to Missions Missions to Public Outcomes

CUSTOMER’S, CUSTOMER

CUSTOMER

08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

6

U.S. Coast Guard Missions 2-Missions, 5-Strategic Goals, 9-Legal Authorities •Homeland Safety •Maritime Safety •Search and Rescue •Maritime Safety

•Maritime Security •Aids to Navigation •Ice Operations

•Protection of Natural Resources •Marine Environmental Protection •Fisheries

•Homeland Security •Maritime Mobility •Ports, Waterways, and Coastal Security •Enforcement of Laws and Treaties

•National Defense •Defense Readiness 08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

7

Process Reengineering Vertical Value Chain Alignment Process Alignment  Link and align daily tactical activities to agency-wide strategic outcomes. Value Chain  Link facility capabilities to operational requirements: our customers; 



Link operational capabilities to mission requirements; Link mission capabilities to public demand for goods/services: our customer’s customer. 08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

Public Demand

Strategic Outcomes Strategic Goals Mission Capability Mission Requirements

Operational Capability Operational Requirements Logistical Capability Logistical Requirements

8

Operational Metrics Asset and Portfolio Performance

Most Important Mission

Mission Readiness Index

Most Important Building

Force Mission Protection Dependency Index Index

Faculty Condition Index

Space Utilization Index

Systems Criticality Index

08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

Additional Assessments

Most Important System

9

Mission Dependency (MDI) Linking Facilities to Missions

Created by Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center, Port Hueneme CA and co-developed with the USCG

08 September 2010

This critical Facility Assessment links facilities to mission from an Operational Risk Management perspective.

Copyright© 2010  USCG

10

Mission Driven Decisions Linking Facilities to Missions

SCI Says Roofs and Electric…. MRI says deficiency and Highest priority

08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

11

Unit Level Decision-Making MDI Driven Facility Backlog Prioritization

08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

12

Integrated Decision-Making BIM Enabled – Mission-Based

08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

13

Missions • Scenarios • Assets Portfolios, Facilities, and Life Cycles Multiple  Locations

GIS

Missions Buildings and Floors

Scenario  Based Planning

USCG ISC Alameda BIM

WFS Query Bounding  Area of Geospatial Coordinates

Spaces

People, Furniture,  Equipment

Sites, Features, and Multiple Buildings Data USCG BIM All Sites

BIM

USCG 08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

IFC IFC CityGML CityGML Google Earth Google Earth XML XML Excel Excel

14 14

TM

Capital Asset Management Portal Access to Aggregated Database and Graphics CAMP combines and displays portal tools and  data views supporting Portfolio  Management,  Integrated Decision‐Making and Value Chain. • Portfolio Management Links Supply and  Demand Side of Scenario Based Mission  Planning: • Real Time Mission Readiness • Scenario Based Business Case Development • Automated Planning Documentation and Web‐ enabled Approval Process • Value Chain as Web‐enabled Workflow

08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

15

Open-BIM Return on Mission • U.S. AEC Industry

• $15.8 Billion Loss due to Interoperability (Study by: National Institute of Standards and Technology. (NIST), Logistics Management Institute (LMI), and the buildingSMARTalliance).

• USCG Civil Engineering

• $7 Million Loss due to Interoperability (Interpolated from the Study by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. (NIST), Logistics Management Institute, (LMI), and the buildingSMARTalliance).

08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

16

Open-BIM Return on Mission New Command Centers • • • •

40 Unique Command Centers Developed Requirements Completed Schematic Design Total Time: 10 Months

Same amount of time to design ONE Center. 08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

17

Open-BIM Return on Mission

Command Center Project • $1 Million Construction • Two Weeks – Design – Procurement • Performance Contracting

08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

18

Lessons Learned • Committed Senior Management • Strategic Thinking • Mission Focused • Info-Centric • Change Oriented • Requirements Driven • Data, Data, Data 08 September 2010

• Committed Senior Management • Data, Data, Data • Software and Hardware Comes and Goes (IFC Focus) • Modular Development • Did I Mention Data?

Copyright© 2010  USCG

19

Transparency of the Data Breeds Self-Correcting Behavior

•Taxonomic Classification •Normalization •Harmonization •Meta-Data Trail

08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

20

INFORMATION about the Building may be

MORE VALUABLE than the Building

BIM‐Enabled Simulations: Natural Disaster and Catastrophic Accident

Anti‐Terrorism and   Force Protection 08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

21

Timeline: 2002 ‐ 2008

08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

22

Involved or Committed? Expectations?

It’s a Chess Game! We Won! Reality?

08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

23

The BIM Balancing Act Organizational Change

Enabling  Technology

Processes

Strategic Thinking 08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

24

Linking Facilities to Missions

Mange Tak… [email protected] 08 September 2010

Copyright© 2010  USCG

25

Product Line Management Product lines: AssetAviation Types: Infrastructure 100 - Operations and Training Facilities Space Types: Surface 200100 - Maintenance and Production Facilities - Operations and Training Facilities Unit Types: Infrastructure 300200 - Research, Development, Test andFacilities Maintenance and Production Aviation Units: AIRSTAs, AIRDETs C4ISR Evaluation Facilities 300Surface - Research, Development, TestMSOs, and Multi-Mission Units: Small Boat STAs, Infrastructure 400 - Supply Facilities Evaluation Facilities STAs, DOGs Logistics 500400 - Hospitals / Medical Facilities Supply Facilities C4ISR Units: LORAN STAs, COMSTAs, Vessel Traffic Infrastructure 600 Administrative Facilities 500 - Hospitals / Medical Facilities Centers, 700600 - Housing and Community Command CentersFacilities - Administrative Facilities 800700 - Utilities andUnits: Ground Improvements Logistics - Housing and Community Facilities 900800 - Real Estate People: Personnel Command, Personnel Housing - Utilities and Ground Improvements Training Centers 900Training: - Real Estate

08 September 2010

Equipment: AR&SC, ELC Supply: AR&SC, ELC Information: TISCOM, C2CEN, OSC Infrastructure: SILC Copyright© 2010  USCG

27