Teaching and Learning Guide for: Cognitive Phenomenology

Teaching  and  Learning  Guide  for:  Cognitive  Phenomenology     Declan  Smithies   The  Ohio  State  University       This  guide  accompanies  t...
Author: Drusilla Sutton
10 downloads 2 Views 80KB Size
Teaching  and  Learning  Guide  for:  Cognitive  Phenomenology  

  Declan  Smithies   The  Ohio  State  University       This  guide  accompanies  the  following  articles:     Declan  Smithies,  ‘The  Nature  of  Cognitive  Phenomenology.’  Philosophy  Compass  X/X   (2013):  XXX-­‐XXX.     Declan  Smithies,  ‘The  Significance  of  Cognitive  Phenomenology.’  Philosophy  Compass   X/X  (2013):  XXX-­‐XXX.       Author’s  Introduction     Cognitive  phenomenology  can  be  defined  as  the  experience  that  is  associated  with   cognitive   activities,   such   as   thinking,   reasoning,   and   understanding.   What   is   at   issue   in   contemporary   debates   is   not   the   existence   of   cognitive   phenomenology,   so   defined,  but  rather  its  nature  and  theoretical  significance.  Debated  questions  about   the   nature   of   cognitive   phenomenology   include   the   following:   What   is   the   relationship   between   the   phenomenology   of   cognition   and   the   intentionality   of   cognition?   And   what   is   the   relationship   between   the   phenomenology   of   cognition   and  the  phenomenology  of  perception?  Debated  questions  about  the  significance  of   cognitive  phenomenology  concern  its  role  in  theories  of  intentionality,  introspective   self-­‐knowledge,  and  knowledge  of  the  external  world.     Author  Recommends     Bayne,  T.  and  M.  Montague,  eds.  Cognitive  Phenomenology.  Oxford:  Oxford  University   Press,  2011.     This  recent  volume  of  essays  represents  the  current  state  of  the  art  in  debates  about   cognitive  phenomenology.  The  introduction  also  provides  useful  background  and  an   overview  of  contemporary  debates.     Chalmers,  D.  ‘The  Representational  Character  of  Experience.’  Ed.  B.  Leiter,  The   Future  for  Philosophy.  New  York,  NY:  Oxford  University  Press,  2004.     This  paper  provides  an  overview  of  representationalist  or  intentionalist  theories  of   experience,  although  the  discussion  is  primarily  focused  on  perceptual  experience,   rather  than  cognitive  experience.    

 

1  

Horgan,   T.   and   J.   Tienson.   ‘The   Intentionality   of   Phenomenology   and   the   Phenomenology  of  Intentionality.’  Ed.  D.  Chalmers,  Philosophy  of  Mind:  Classical  and   Contemporary  Readings.  New  York,  NY:  Oxford  UP,  2002.     This  paper  argues  for  the  interdependence  of  phenomenology  and  intentionality  in   the  case  of  perceptual  experience  and  cognitive  experience  alike.     Kriegel,  U,  ed.  Phenomenal  Intentionality.  New  York,  NY:  Oxford  UP,  2013.     This  is  a  new  volume  of  essays  on  the  relationship  between  consciousness  and   intentionality,  including  several  chapters  specifically  focused  on  conscious  thought.   The  introduction  also  provides  a  useful  overview  of  what  Kriegel  has  dubbed  the   “phenomenal  intentionality  program”.     Pitt,   D.   ‘The   Phenomenology   of   Cognition,   Or,   What   is   it   Like   to   Think   that   P?’   Philosophy  and  Phenomenological  Research  69  (2004):  1-­‐36.     This  paper  argues  that  the  phenomenology  of  conscious  thought  explains  how  it  is   that  we  can  know  what  we  are  consciously  thinking.     Prinz,   J.   ‘All   Consciousness   is   Perceptual.’   Eds.   B.   McLaughlin   and   J.   Cohen,   Contemporary  Debates  in  Philosophy  of  Mind.  Oxford:  Blackwell,  2007.     This  paper  gives  a  very  clear  statement  and  defence  of  the  reductionist  view  that  all   consciousness  is  perceptual  in  nature  and  hence  that  all  cognitive  experience  is   ultimately  reducible  to  perceptual  experience.     Siewert,  C.  The  Significance  of  Consciousness.  Princeton,  NJ:  Princeton  UP,  1998.     This  is  an  extended  discussion  of  the  relationship  between  consciousness  and   intentionality  that  includes  chapters  on  the  nature  of  perceptual  experience  (Ch.7)   and  the  nature  of  conscious  thought  (Ch.8).     Strawson,  G.  Mental  Reality.  Cambridge,  MA:  MIT  Press,  1994.     This  book  argues  for  the  centrality  of  consciousness  in  the  study  of  the  mind.  The   introduction  (Ch.  1)  provides  many  vivid  examples  of  cognitive  experience,   including  what  Strawson  calls  “understanding  experience”.     Online  Materials     Galen  Strawson,  ‘What  is  Cognitive  Phenomenology?’  Interview  from  the  Conference   “Emergence  and  Panpsychism”  in  Munich  2011.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYBsrziW1pE    

 

2  

Charles  Siewert,  ‘Consciousness  and  Intentionality.’  Ed.  E.  Zalta,  The  Stanford   Encyclopedia  of  Philosophy.   http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consciousness-­‐intentionality/     PhilPapers:  Conscious  Thought.   http://philpapers.org/browse/conscious-­‐thought     PhilPapers:  Consciousness  and  Intentionality.   http://philpapers.org/browse/consciousness-­‐and-­‐intentionality     PhilPapers:  Phenomenal  Intentionality.   http://philpapers.org/browse/phenomenal-­‐intentionality     Sample  Syllabus     Background  Reading     Declan  Smithies,  ‘The  Nature  of  Cognitive  Phenomenology.’  Philosophy  Compass  X/X   (2013):  XXX-­‐XXX.     Declan  Smithies,  ‘The  Significance  of  Cognitive  Phenomenology.’  Philosophy  Compass   X/X  (2013):  XXX-­‐XXX.     Week  I:  What  is  Cognitive  Phenomenology?     Horgan,   T.   and   J.   Tienson.   ‘The   Intentionality   of   Phenomenology   and   the   Phenomenology  of  Intentionality.’  Ed.  D.  Chalmers,  Philosophy  of  Mind:  Classical  and   Contemporary  Readings.  New  York,  NY:  Oxford  UP,  2002.     Prinz,   J.   ‘All   Consciousness   is   Perceptual.’   Eds.   B.   McLaughlin   and   J.   Cohen,   Contemporary   Debates   in   Philosophy   of   Mind.   Oxford:   Blackwell,   2007.   OR:   ‘The   Sensory   Basis   of   Cognitive   Phenomenology.’   Eds.   Bayne,   T.   and   M.   Montague,   Cognitive  Phenomenology.  Oxford:  Oxford  University  Press,  2011.     Siewert,  C.  The  Significance  of  Consciousness.  Princeton,  NJ:  Princeton  UP,  1998:  Ch.8.   OR:  ‘Phenomenal  Thought.’  Eds.  Bayne,  T.  and  M.  Montague,  Cognitive   Phenomenology.  Oxford:  Oxford  University  Press,  2011.     Strawson,   G.   Mental  Reality.   Cambridge,   MA:   MIT   Press,   1994:   Ch.1.   OR:   ‘Cognitive   Phenomenology:   Real   Life.’   Eds.   Bayne,   T.   and   M.   Montague,   Cognitive   Phenomenology.  Oxford:  Oxford  University  Press,  2011.     Wilson,  R.  ‘Intentionality  and  Phenomenology.’  Pacific  Philosophical  Quarterly  84   (2003):  413-­‐31.    

 

3  

Week  II:  Cognitive  Phenomenology  and  Intentionality     Horgan,   T.,   and   G.   Graham.   ‘Phenomenal   Intentionality   and   Content   Determinacy.’   Ed.  R.  Schantz,  Prospects  for  Meaning.  Berlin:  De  Gruyter,  2012.     Kriegel,  U.  ‘Cognitive  Phenomenology  as  the  Basis  of  Unconscious  Content.’  Eds.   Bayne,  T.  and  M.  Montague,  Cognitive  Phenomenology.  Oxford:  Oxford  University   Press,  2011.     Pautz,  A.  ‘Does  Phenomenology  Ground  Mental  Content?’  Ed.  U.  Kriegel,  Phenomenal   Intentionality.  New  York,  NY:  Oxford  UP,  2013.     Smithies,   D.   ‘The   Mental   Lives   of   Zombies.’   Philosophical   Perspectives   26   (2012):   343-­‐72.     Week  III:  Cognitive  Phenomenology  and  Self-­‐Knowledge     Goldman,   A.   ‘The   Psychology   of   Folk   Psychology.’   Behavioral  and  Brain  Sciences   16   (1993):  15-­‐28.     Peacocke,  C.  ‘Conscious  Attitudes,  Attention  and  Self-­‐Knowledge.’  Eds.  C.  Wright,  B.   Smith  and  C.  MacDonald,  Knowing  Our  Own  Minds.  Oxford:  Clarendon  Press,  1998.     Pitt,   D.   ‘The   Phenomenology   of   Cognition,   Or,   What   is   it   Like   to   Think   that   P?’   Philosophy  and  Phenomenological  Research  69  (2004):  1-­‐36.     Smithies,  D.  ‘A  Simple  Theory  of  Introspection.’  Ed.  D.  Smithies  and  D.  Stoljar,   Introspection  and  Consciousness.  New  York,  NY:  Oxford  University  Press,  2012.     Week  IV:  Cognitive  Phenomenology  and  Epistemology     Bealer,  G.  ‘A  Theory  of  the  A  Priori.’  Pacific  Philosophical  Quarterly  81.1  (2000):  1-­‐30.     Chudnoff,   E.   ‘The   Nature   of   Intuitive   Justification.’   Philosophical   Studies   153.2   (2011):  313-­‐33.     Huemer,   M.   Skepticism   and   the   Veil   of   Perception.   Lanham,   MD:   Rowman   and   Littlefield,  2001:  Ch.5.     Smithies,  D.  ‘The  Phenomenal  Basis  of  Epistemic  Justification.’  Ed.  J.  Kallestrup  and   M.  Sprevak,  New  Waves  in  Philosophy  of  Mind.  Palgrave  Macmillan,  forthcoming.     Week  V:  Cognitive  Phenomenology  and  Methodology     Bayne,   T.   and   M.   Spener.   ‘Introspective   Humility.’   Ed.   E.   Sosa   and   E.   Villanueva,   Philosophical  Issues  20  (2010):  1-­‐22.    

4  

  Horgan,   T.   ‘Introspection   about   Phenomenal   Consciousness:   Running   the   Gamut   from   Infallibility   to   Impotence.’   Eds.   D.   Smithies   and   D.   Stoljar,   Introspection   and   Consciousness,  New  York,  NY:  Oxford  UP,  2012.     Schwitzgebel,   E.   ‘The   Unreliability   of   Naïve   Introspection.’   Philosophical   Review   117.2  (2008):  245-­‐73.     Spener,   M.   ‘Disagreement   About   Cognitive   Phenomenology.’   Eds.   T.   Bayne   and   M.   Montague.  Cognitive  Phenomenology,  Oxford  UP,  2011.     Focus  Questions     1. The  Existence  Question:  are  there  experiences  associated  with  instances  of   cognition,  such  as  thinking,  reasoning,  and  understanding?     2. The  Reduction  Question:  what  is  the  relationship  between  the  phenomenology  of   cognition  and  the  phenomenology  of  perception?     3. The  Intentionality  Question:  what  is  the  relationship  between  the   phenomenology  of  cognition  and  the  intentionality  of  cognition?     4. A  Question  about  Self-­‐Knowledge:  what  is  the  role  of  cognitive  phenomenology   in  explaining  our  introspective  knowledge  of  cognition?     5. A  Question  about  External  World  Knowledge:  what  is  the  role  of  cognitive   phenomenology  in  explaining  our  knowledge  of  the  external  world?     6. A  Methodological  Question:  what  are  the  methodological  implications  of   widespread  disagreements  about  the  nature  of  cognitive  phenomenology?      

 

5