Stem cell Research in Friedreich Ataxia
Hélène Puccio Research Director Inserm
[email protected]
Translational Medicine and Neurogenetics
Fundamental and pathophysiological mechanisms in recessive ataxia Friedreich ataxia (Frataxin)
Fe-S cluster metabolism
X-linked sideroblastic anemia with ataxia (ABCb7)
CoQ10 metabolism
Autosomal Recessive Cerebellar Ataxia type 2 (ADCK3)
FUNCTION
THERAPY
FRIEDREICH ATAXIA FRATAXIN
PHYSIOPATHOLOGY Knockout Knockdown
Cellular Models
Mouse Models
Cardiac Neuronal Muscular Hepatic
What is a Stem Cell? stem cell SELF-‐RENEWAL (copying)
stem cell
DIFFERENTIATION (specializing)
specialized cell e.g. muscle cell, nerve cell
A cell that has the ability to continuously divide and differentiate (develop) into various other kind(s) of cells/tissues
Why are stem cells interesting? They have the potential to replace cell tissue that has been damaged or destroyed by severe illnesses => Regenerative medicine: too early, not scientifically mature They can replicate themselves over and over for a very long time. Understanding how stem cells develop into healthy and diseased cells will assist the search for cures. Drugs can be screened by testing them on human embryonic stem cells or the specialized cell derived from them.
Stem Cell Jargon Potency
A measure of how many types of specialized cell a stem cell can make
Pluripotent Can make all types of specialized cells in the body
Multipotent Can make multiple types of specialized cells, but not all types
Where do we find stem cells?
Mul=potent
embryonic stem cells blastocyst -‐ a very early embryo Pluripotent/To=potent
Assue stem cells
fetus, baby and throughout life
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) iPS are a type of pluripotent stem cell artificially derived from a non-pluripotent cell, i.e. an adult skin cell • iPS were first produced in 2006 from mouse cells and in 2007 from human cells. • iPS are not totipotent and do not involve the destruction of an embryo.
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) ‘gene=c reprogramming’ = add certain genes to the cell cell from the body
induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell behaves like an embryonic stem cell
differen=a=on culture iPS cells in the lab
Advantage: no need for embryos!
all possible types of specialized cells
Stem Cell: Challenges
A s n o iti d n o rc e d n u w o r g grow under c
stem cells
grow u
g ro
w
onditions B
nder cond i
un
?
de
rc
on
skin
neurons
=ons C
blood di t i on
sD
liver
Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) Most common recessive ataxia (1/30 000) progresssive mixed spinocerebellar and sensory ataxia hypertrophic cardiomyopathy increased incidence of diabetes
Frataxin
(GAA) 7-34
Normal (GAA)100-1000
FA
Transcriptional silencing
Frataxin
Frataxin is a mitochondrial protein Ubiquitously expressed (expressed in all tissues) Exact function of frataxin is unclear and very controversial closely linked to iron homeostasis mitochondrial function (energy production)
Why do we need new models for FRDA? Available cells for patients (fibroblasts and lymphocytes) - useful for some studies BUT are not the affected tissues - neurons, cardiomyocytes, beta-cell from pancreas Autopsy material is important to understand disease BUT late stages Mouse models developed - complete absence of frataxin: very useful for pathophysiology BUT more severe - GAA knockin or transgenic: very useful for looking mechanism of gene silencing by GAA and testing compounds BUT mildly affected
WE WOULD LIKE a human model, with large GAA repeats and low frataxin of affected tissues to be able to confirm hypothesis uncovered in current models and test new hypothesis.
Development of a GAA-based model induced Pluripotent Stem cell (iPS) Somatic cells (fibroblasts)
Reprogrammed 4 fibroblast lines 1. Control female 25 yrs 2. Control male 50 yrs 3. FA female GAA= 600/830 4. FA female GAA= 430/900
feeders
iPS colonie
Reprogramming (pluripotency factors) Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, Lin28
iPSC
Differentiation Specific cell types
neurons, cardiomyocytes, … = genetic information than the starting somatic cell
Collaboration Stéphane Viville
Marie Wattenhofer
Bonafide iPS- are the iPS pluripotent
1. Expression of endogenous ES markers 2. Shutdown of len=virus factors 3. Normal caryotype 4. Embryoid Bodies (3 Germline layers) 5. Teratoma forma=on: -‐ Ectoderm-‐derived -‐ Endoderm-‐derived -‐ Mesoderm-‐derived
neural Assue
Gut-‐like epithelium
neural ganglion
Epidermis
carAlage
Marie Wattenhofer
3000 bp
500 bp
1000 bp
FRDA iPS cells retain pathological GAA size and low levels of frataxin 500 bp
CT136 4L
FXN mRNA levels reduced
B
100
iPSCs FD141 4L
45 46 47 48 49 50
M FD141 43
28 29 30
FD135 4L
C 51 54 55 56 57 58mRNA level normalised FXN 60 61 62
M FD135 28 29 30 32 33 FD136 21 22 23
GAA expansion of pathological size
80
Tra1-60
Tra1-81 hFXN 1-210
CT136-4L clone 34
60
000 bp
40
000 bp
3000 bp
500 bp
1000 bp
CT -4L (n=5)
1000 bp
CT136-4L 38 CT -4L cloneFD135-4L (n=5)
clones (n=4)
CT136-4L CT145-4L FD141-4L FD135-4L
FD135-4L clone 30
500 bp
control
hFXN 42-210
20
FA1
FXN protein levels reduced cl 34
cl 25
cl 2
cl 51 cl 49
FD141-4L clones (n=4)
hFXN 81-210
ß-tubulin
cl 30
hFXN 1-210
FD141-4L clone 49 hFXN 42-210 FD135-4L clones (n=4)
FD141-4L clones (n=4)
hFXN 81-210
FD141-4L clone 51
ß-tubulin
Marie Wattenhofer and Aurore Hick
Differentiation of iPS cells into neuronal and cardiac lineage
1
2
3
4
Mesoderm iPS cells
pleas
Generation of neural cell from iPS (Control and FRDA)
dNS FD135-4L
C M
Please choose theraph g you prefer Frataxin mRNA level (NS CT136 4L clone 38 set at 100 %)
NS N
i
N
NS
35-4L FD141-4L e 30 clone 51
dNS FD141-4L
120 100 80 60 40 20 0
Frataxin mRNA level (iPSC CT136 4L clone 25 set at 100 %)
dNS CT145-4L
120 100 80 60 40 20 0
CT FRDA NS NS
CT
FRDA
iPSC
CT F
NS
of D1, D2 and D3, o star t t with control. Could you please add the c Collaboration Massimo Pandolfo and Satyan Chintawar
D2
C
D3
Generation of neural cell from iPS (Control and FRDA)
Collaboration Massimo Pandolfo and Satyan Chintawar
30
20 20
10 10
0
10 m V
FRDA neurons are functionnally impaired
-2 0
m V
-4 0
-6 0
0 .0
0 .2
0 .4
0 .6
0 .8
90pA
0
1
0
0
FA 1 3 5 n= 15 F D135
-10
FA 1 4 1 n =15
t e xt
F D136
CT 136 n =15
CT 145 n = 13
F D141
F D145
F A 13 5 F A 1 41 C T136- 2C0 n=16 7 n =24 7 n =24 5 n
- 40
-20
1 .0
-30
2
0
0
E
mitochondrial membrane potential CT145-4L
FD135-4L
F
-40
0
0
20
0
4
0
s
0
6
0
0
8
0
0
1
0
200 ms
00
200 m s
0.0
0.5
s 1.0
1.5
2.0
Electrophysiological studies
%of cells
50
40 40
30 30
E2
20 20
10 10
0
0
FA 1 3 5 n= 15 F D135
E
FA 1 4 1 n =15
te x t
FD 1 3 6
CT145-4L
C T1 3 6 n =15 FD 1 4 1
CT 145 n =13 FD 1 4 5
FD135-4L
Collaboration Massimo Pandolfo and Satyan Chintawar
E2 T M R M M e a n fl u o re s c e n c e i n te n s i ty
50
TM R M M e a n f l u o r e sc e n c e i n t en s i ty
u rre ntn t NN aa CCu rre EEvo vo ke ked d AA P P p onnt an eo us A P SSpo t. AP
60
% o f ce l l s p a r ti c i p a ti n g in s p o n ta n e o u s c a l c i u m o sc i l a ti o n s
D5 60
**
***
F A 1 35 F A 14 1 C T 136 C T** 1 45 n=24 5 n=20 6 n=16 7 n=24 7
- 60
***
F A 135 F A 141 C T 136 C T 145
F F A 135 F A 141 C T 136 C T145
90pA
2m0VmV
0
20mV
30
% o f c e l l s p ar ti c i p s p o n t an e o u s c a l ci u
CT
%o
CT
- 80
2 1
1
Differentiation of iPS cells into cardiomyocytes
iPS
EB
Cardiogenic factors Beating cardiomyocytes
Control
Aurore Hick
hFXN/GAPDH
FRDA cardiomyocyte present a mitochondrial defect
*
** * p Promising for understand the step leading to cell dysfunction, for screening possible therapeutic compounds
Perspectives: stem cell in FA Several different labs (at least 8) have generated iPS cells for FA - neurons, cardiomyocytes (efforts in making pancreatic cells) - pathophysiological studies - screen candidate drug compounds - large scale unbiased screen
Several laboratories (Australia and UK) working on regenerative medecine - Mesenchemal Stem Cell (bone-marrow/blood cord) in mouse - iPS cell injection in mouse and rat CAREFULL: TOO EARLY TO THINK ABOUT THERAPEUTIC APPLICATION
FRDA and Fe-S biosynthesis
Collaborators
Brahim Belbellaa Lena Beilschmidt Florent Colin Aurore Hick Alain Martelli Morgane Perdomini Laurence Reutenauer Nadège Vaucamps
Sandrine Ollagnier de Choudens (CEA-Grenoble) Yvain Nicolet/Juan Fontecilla (IBIS-Grenoble) Cécile Bouton/JC Drapier (CNRS-Gif-sur-Yvette) Arnold Munnich / Agnès Rötig (Necker-Paris) Christine Tranchant (CHU Strasbourg) Massimo Pandolfo/Satyan Chintawar (Hôpital ULB- Belgium) Hervé Puy (Centre Français des Porphyrie- Paris) Matthias Hentze / Bruno Galy (EMBL-Heidelberg) Christopher Pearson (Hosp.Sick Children, Toronto) Stéphane Viville (IGBMC) Michel Koenig (IGBMC)
Nadège Carelle-Calmels Stéphane Schmucker Marie Wattenhofer-Donzé ARCA2 and CoQ10 biosynthesis Floriana Licitra Leila Laredj CAG repeat instability Karine Merienne Claudia Andretta Agathi Goula