NCSL Fiscal Analysts Seminar October 5-6, 2016

State Tax Climate Issues Douglas L. Lindholm President & Executive Director Council On State Taxation (COST) [email protected]

State Tax Climate Issues and Misperceptions #1: Suggestions for improving state tax administrative climate

#2: Assertions that businesses don’t pay their fair share of state taxes #3: State corporate income tax revenues are declining; personal income tax revenues are increasing #4: Big businesses benefit from loopholes not available to small businesses, so let’s “level the playing field”

#5: Unitary combined reporting creates fewer tax distortions than separate entity filing, and is an effective way to close “loopholes” #6: States should impose sales taxes on services to keep up with our expanding service economy #7: In the name of transparency, corporate tax returns should be made publicly available #8: Gross receipts taxes are an effective way to tax businesses #9: State tax haven “blacklists” are an effective way to recoup millions in profits parked offshore #10: How should states cope with targeted tax incentives? 2

Tax Climate Issues

#1: Suggestions for improving state tax administration (“The Best and Worst of State Tax Administration”) 3

COST State Administrative Practices Scorecard (2013)

• Areas Evaluated: – Independent Tax Dispute Forum – Pay-to-Play Tax Litigation System – Even-handed Statutes of Limitation / Interest Rates – Adequate Appeal/Protest Period – Transparency

Independent Tax Dispute Forums

A B C D

WA

ME

WA

ND

VT

MT

NH

MN

OR

WI

SD ID NE

IN

IL KS

CO

NJ

IA

NV UT

OH

MD DC

MO WV OK

AZ

VA

KY

NM

NC

TN AR TX

AK

SC MS

AL

GA

LA HI

RI

CT

PA WY

CA

NY

MI

MA

FL

DE

Pay-to-Play Tax Litigation System

A B C D

WA

ME

WA

ND

VT

MT

NH

MN

OR

WI

SD ID NE

IN

IL KS

CO

NJ

IA

NV UT

OH

MD DC

MO WV OK

AZ

VA

KY

NM

NC

TN AR TX

AK

SC MS

AL

GA

LA HI

RI

CT

PA WY

CA

NY

MI

MA

FL

DE

Even-handed Statutes of Limitation

A B C D

WA

ME

WA

ND

VT

MT

NH

MN

OR

WI

SD ID NE

IN

IL KS

CO

NJ

IA

NV UT

OH

MD DC

MO WV OK

AZ

VA

KY

NM

NC

TN AR TX

AK

SC MS

AL

GA

LA HI

RI

CT

PA WY

CA

NY

MI

MA

FL

DE

Equalized Interest Rates on Assessments and Refunds A B C D

WA

ME

WA

ND

VT

MT

NH

MN

OR

WI

SD ID NE

IN

IL KS

CO

NJ

IA

NV UT

OH

MD DC

MO WV OK

AZ

VA

KY

NM

NC

TN AR TX

AK

SC MS

AL

GA

LA HI

RI

CT

PA WY

CA

NY

MI

MA

FL

DE

Adequate Appeal / Protest Periods

A B C D

WA

ME

WA

ND

VT

MT

NH

MN

OR

WI

SD ID NE

IN

IL KS

CO

NJ

IA

NV UT

OH

MD DC

MO WV OK

AZ

VA

KY

NM

NC

TN AR TX

AK

SC MS

AL

GA

LA HI

RI

CT

PA WY

CA

NY

MI

MA

FL

DE

Transparency in Guidance & Rulings

A B C D

ME

WA

ND

VT

MT

NH

MN

OR

WI

SD ID NE

IN

IL KS

CO

NJ

IA

NV UT

OH

MD DC

MO WV OK

AZ

VA

KY

NM

NC

TN AR TX

AK

SC MS

AL

GA

LA HI

RI

CT

PA WY

CA

NY

MI

MA

FL

DE

Overall Grades: State Tax Administration A B C D

WA

ME

WA

ND

VT

MT

NH

MN

OR

WI

SD

NY

MI

NE

IN

IL UT

KS

CO

NJ

IA

NV CA

OH

MD DC

MO WV OK

AZ

VA

KY

NM

NC

TN AR TX

AK

SC MS

AL

GA

LA HI

RI

CT

PA WY

MA

FL

DE

Tax Climate Issues

#2: Assertions that businesses don’t pay their fair share of state taxes

12

Bumper Sticker by Citizens for Tax Justice:

13

COST Business Tax Burden Study

14

What do Businesses Pay?  Businesses paid more than $688 Billion in U.S. state and local taxes in FY2014, an increase of 2.2% from 2013 • How Much Do Businesses Contribute to State Revenues? – US Average for FY 2014: 44.8% of all state and local tax revenues

 Remarkably, the business share of SALT nationally has been within 1% of 45% since 2000 COST Study, Total state and local business taxes: State-by-state estimates for fiscal year 2014, October 2015 15

FY 2014 Total State & Local Business Taxes, Nationwide Property Sales

U.S.

Corporate Income

8%

5%

10% 36%

12%

Excise Tax Unemployment Insurance

8% 21%

Individual Income License & Other

FY 2014 COST Business Tax Burden Study Published 9/2015

16

Share of State and Local Business Taxes Paid by Businesses SHARE OF STATE AND LOCAL TAXES PAID BY BUSINESSES, 2000 to 2014

See generally, COST Business Tax Burden Studies, available at www.cost.org. 17

Why Tax Business at All? • Who really pays business taxes?: – Labor (lower wages) – Consumers (higher prices), or – Owners (smaller investment returns)

• Best Rationale: Businesses should pay for benefits provided by governments – Dilemma: How to account for spending on education • “Tax to Benefit Ratio” for US businesses: 3.35/1 (1.23/1 if 50% of education spending benefits businesses) 18

Tax Climate Issues

#3: State corporate income tax revenues are declining; personal income tax revenues are increasing

19

20

Economic Role of the Corporate Income Tax • Bill Fox, et al.: “…there is little [economic] justification for the state corporate income tax.” • Charles McClure: “It is hard to think of a good reason to tax corporate income….The case against state corporate income taxes is even stronger.” • OECD: “…corporate income taxes are the most harmful type of tax for economic growth.” 21

State and local CIT and other business activity tax collections as share of total state and local business tax collections

10.9%

10.4%

8.3%

8.5%

8.4%

9.9%

10.7%

11.3%

10.8%

9.6%

9.0%

9.3%

9.1%

9.3%

9.4%

22

Trend to watch: Growth of Pass-Through Entities (PTEs) Taxed under the PIT • In 1980, PTEs accounted for 20% of total US business income; In 2012, PTEs accounted for 64% of US Business income (Tax Foundation Report) • In 2014, 52% of state income tax revenues were received from state personal income tax revenues (COST/EY Study) • PTE’s pay a lesser average combined federal/state rate than C Corporations: 19% v. 31.8% (NBER Study) • Growth of PTE’s will have significant future impact: – Federal tax reform implications (corporate integration?) – Federal and state audits of partnerships as entities – Growth of PTE’s accounts for much of the growth in income inequality over last three decades (NBER) 23

Tax Climate Issues

#4: Big businesses benefit from loopholes not available to small businesses, so let’s “level the playing field”

24

25

26

Tax Climate Issues:

#5:

Unitary combined reporting creates fewer tax distortions than separate entity filing, and is an effective way to close “loopholes” 27

Mandatory Unitary Combined Reporting • Judicial doctrine, vague definitions • Assumes all entities in group have same level of profitability • No Federal conformity for unitary groups • Complex compliance & audits; encourages costly litigation • Does not provide a stable revenue source

• Fiscal estimates speculative; creates winners & losers • Does not improve “fairness” of tax system • Other tools available to combat “income shifting”

Tax Climate Issues:

#6:

States should impose sales taxes on business services to keep up with our expanding service economy

30

State and Local Sales Taxes Imposed on Business Input Purchases, 2011

57% 40% N/A

43%

37% N/A 39% 46%

43%

N/A

28%

40% 53%

41%

53%

53% 32% 49%

34%

42% 32% 49% 45%

45%

49% 39%

39%

39%

51% 29%

46%

36%

N/A 41%

46% 36%

47%

53%

55%

35%

33% 37%

52%

34%

39% 33%

44%

55%

LEGEND

Lowest GSP Mid GSP

N/A 34%

High GSP

33%

COST Sales Tax on Business Inputs Study, Published 2013

31

“What’s Wrong With Taxing Business Services?” • COST Study on Problems with Taxing Business Services: April 4, 2013 – “Pyramiding” of the tax leads to arbitrary and hidden differences in effective sales tax rates on different goods and services that distort consumer choices; – Lack of transparency in sales tax base creates higher “hidden” effective tax rates making it difficult to determine who bears the burden of the tax; – Taxes on intermediate purchasers put companies at a competitive disadvantage and encourages them to relocate; – Encourages companies to self-provide business services, reducing efficiency and competition; – Detrimental impacts on a state’s business tax competitiveness; and – Extremely difficult compliance, sourcing, and definitional burdens for taxpayers and tax administrators alike.

32

Tax Climate Issues:

#7: In the name of transparency, corporate tax returns should be made publicly available

33

Corporate Return Disclosure • From the US Congress Joint Committee on Taxation (2000): – Taxpayers have a justifiable expectation of privacy in the extensive information they furnish under penalty of fine or imprisonment. – Our tax system is based on voluntary compliance. Many observers believe that the degree of voluntary compliance is directly affected by the degree of confidentiality given the information that is provided to the IRS. – If returns and return information were publicly available, it would invite a variety of intrusions into a taxpayer’s privacy. – Business competitors could use the information to gain economic advantage. – A lack of confidentiality could also facilitate the use of return information for political gain. 34

Corporate Disclosure Examples: Abuse? You Decide.

35

Tax Climate Issues:

#8: Gross receipts taxes are an effective way to tax businesses

Gross Receipts Taxes as a Policy Choice • Uneven Stealth Tax: Violates principles of economic competitiveness and transparency • Unfair Tax: Imposes Significant Tax Burden on Start-Up, Low Margin and Unprofitable Enterprises • Tax Pyramiding: Imposed at Every Level of Production • Least Economically Neutral Tax • “There is no sensible case for gross receipts taxation…. [Gross receipts taxes] do not belong in any program of tax reform.” COST/Tax Foundation: “Gross Receipts Taxes in State Government Finances: A Review of Their History and Performance,” John Mikesell, Indiana University, Published January, 2007

Gross Receipts Taxes as a Policy Choice

COST/Tax Foundation: “Gross Receipts Taxes in State Government Finances: A Review of Their History and Performance,” John Mikesell, Indiana University, January, 2007. (www.cost.org)

Tax Climate Issues:

#9:

State tax haven “blacklists” are an effective way to recoup millions in profits parked offshore

40

International Competition

41

Existing State “Tax Haven” Provisions • Six states (Alaska, Connecticut, Montana, Oregon, Rhode Island, and West Virginia) plus DC currently have some form of a “tax haven” provision that seeks to include certain foreign entities in a state’s unitary combined return • Two approaches: – 1) Blacklist: Defining a “tax haven” by maintaining a statutory list of foreign jurisdictions (commonly referred to as the “blacklist” approach). MT & OR (current), CT & DC (repealed)

– 2) Criteria: Employ a facts & circumstances test that looks to certain criteria, typically modeled after the Multistate Tax Commission’s “tax haven” definition in the combined reporting model statute. 42

Council On State Taxation

“Tax Haven” State Enactment Status and 2015/2016 Proposals Enacted Tax Haven Provisions Tax Haven “Blacklist” Included or Required in Enacted Legislation 2015 Proposals- Not Enacted 2015/2016 Proposals 2016 Proposals WA MT

ME

ND

OR

VT

MN

ID

NH

WI

SD

MI

NY

WY NV

IL

UT

CA

AZ

TX

AR

SC

Paul J. Hartman State and Local Tax Forum

AL

CT NJ

DC MTC

FL

*

DE

GA

LA

DC and Connecticut have subsequently repealed or removed the “blacklist” requirement in favor of “indicia” of tax havens. 43

NC

TN

HI

*

VA

KY

MS

AK

WV

MO

OK

NM

MD

OH

IN

CO KS

RI

PA

IA

NE

CT

MA

*

Problems with Tax Haven Legislation: the Arbitrary Nature of the Lists

• The lists are based on an outdated OECD list developed for transparency & information sharing • Not limited to island economies, and includes low tax rate and other tax favorable characteristics • The list creates a huge disincentive for foreign direct investment – few states realize their extent of FDI • The faulty premise of tax haven legislation: profits booked to these countries are per se tax evasion • Potential constitutional infirmity (and guaranteed litigation) resulting from tax haven approach 44

Council On State Taxation

Comparing US PIRG Estimates to Actual State DOR Data Fiscal Impact of Proposed Tax Haven Legislation in Various States Jurisdiction

PIRG Estimate

State Estimate

Montana

$35 million

$7 million

Oregon

$225 million

$18 million

Massachusetts

$991 million

$79 million

Colorado

$246 million

$46 million

Kentucky

$187 million

$65 million

New Hampshire

$98 million

$5 million

Dist. of Columbia

$284 million

$3 million 45

45

Council On State Taxation

Released March 1, 2016 (www.cost.org)

46

Tax Climate Issues:

#10:

How should states cope with targeted tax incentives?

Questions?

[email protected]

Council On State Taxation

Tax Foundation Rankings – TF 2015 State Business Tax Climate Index: (Best: Wyoming; Worst: New Jersey) • • • • •

North Carolina: Louisiana: Ohio: Minnesota: New York:

16th 35th 44th 47th 49th

(44th in 2014) (32d in 2014) (42d in 2014) (same) (same)

– Considerations: • • • •

Measures 5 taxes: PIT, CIT, SUT, PT, UIT The absence of a major tax is a significant factor; Different business taxes are weighted differently; Severance taxes are not included

Tax Foundation Study: Weighting of Taxes

Source: Texas Taxpayers and Research Association