SSAP 101: Issues to consider

1 SSAP 101: Issues to consider Session 506 IASA 86TH ANNUAL EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCE & BUSINESS SHOW Panel members Jeanine Kissinger, CPA Nationwi...
Author: April Greene
0 downloads 1 Views 670KB Size
1

SSAP 101: Issues to consider Session 506

IASA 86TH ANNUAL EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCE & BUSINESS SHOW

Panel members

Jeanine Kissinger, CPA Nationwide Insurance

Aaron Maguire, CPA Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP

Carrie Small, CPA Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP

3

Agenda

1) General observations 2) Valuation allowance considerations 3) DTA admissibility – part 1 4) DTA admissibility – part 2 5) DTA admissibility – part 3 6) Tax loss contingencies 7) Other considerations 8) Best practices 9) Tax reform 4

Section one

GENERAL OBSERVATIONS

General observations

 SSAP 101 Golden Rule

ASSUME NOTHING

6

General observations

 Labor intensive Increased recordkeeping and detail

Analytical review

Template development

 Distinction between life and non-life companies important  Creates added complexity in surplus and dividend planning

7

Section two

VALUATION ALLOWANCE CONSIDERATIONS

Valuation allowance considerations

 Valuation allowance (VA) • More-likely-than-not (MLTN) that some portion or all of DTA will not be realized » MLTN is a likelihood of more than 50 percent

• Based on weight of all available evidence

 Separate company, reporting entity basis

9

Valuation allowance considerations

 VA utilized strictly to calculate the “adjusted gross DTA” • Consider VA before DTA admissibility test Gross deferred tax asset - Valuation allowance = Adjusted gross deferred tax asset

 VA results in a reduction of the gross DTA • Not a statutory valuation allowance reserve within the financial statements • Change in VA reflected in statutory rate reconciliation

10

Valuation allowance considerations

 Example: • Consolidated group with $1 billion of taxable income per year • Subsidiary has $(1) million of taxable losses each year • Tax sharing agreement states that consolidated group pays for subsidiary loss • Subsidiary has $2 million of DTAs (does not include NOLs)

 Is a valuation allowance necessary?

11

Section three

DTA ADMISSIBILITY – PART 1 (PARAGRAPH 11.a.)

Life versus non-life

 Important to distinguish between life and non-life companies • Different carryback periods Life companies

Non-life companies

3 year ordinary carryback

2 year ordinary carryback

3 year capital carryback

3 year capital carryback

• How is life versus non-life determined? • Annual statement versus tax return

13

Hypothetical NOLs Nonlife Reporting Entity 12/31/14 Reporting Year

Ordinary loss carryback

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Taxes paid

Taxes paid

Estimated taxes paid

One-year reversals (hypothetical loss)

Two-year reversals (hypothetical loss)

Three-year reversals (hypothetical loss)

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Capital loss carryback Legend

14

=

2015 capital loss carrybacks

=

2015 ordinary loss carrybacks

=

2016 capital loss carrybacks

=

2016 ordinary loss carrybacks

=

2017 capital loss carrybacks

Tax character

 Tax character is important • A nonlife entity has $100 ordinary DTA that will reverse in 2015 • What can be admitted under 11.a? Carryback years

Ordinary taxes recoverable

Capital taxes recoverable

2014

$30

$25

2013

$35

$10

$65

$35

Total

» $65 ordinary taxes and $35 capital taxes can be recovered • Remember: » Ordinary DTAs can be admitted based on capital taxes recoverable » Capital DTAs cannot be admitted based on ordinary taxes recoverable

15

Reversal patterns

16

Review reversal patterns annually

Keep gross (not tax effected)

Review impact of tax planning strategies

Remember nonadmitted assets

Determination of reversal patterns  Loss reserve discounting • Look at loss payment patterns

 Unearned premium reserve • Check annual statement to see if any UPR earned after 1 year

 Credits • General business (i.e. affordable housing), foreign tax, alternative minimum tax (AMT) • Determine when credits will be utilized • Consider ordering rules

 Supporting documentation and data 17

Considerations  Avoid netting DTAs and DTLs • Ex: Sec 807(f) adjustments

 AMT considerations • Taxes recoverable in carryback years can be limited if loss carrybacks trigger AMT

 Tax loss contingency considerations • Impact of releases of tax loss contingencies • RAR adjustments

 Merger and acquisition considerations • Pre- versus post-acquisition tax provision matters • Recovery of prior taxes paid in accordance with IRS rules and regulations 18

Taxes recoverable

 Tax return basis, not taxes recorded on financial statements  DTA admissibility under 11.a. • Footnote 2, SSAP 101 • Taxes paid is maximum amount that can be admitted under 11.a. • May not exceed the amount that the entity could reasonably expect to have refunded by its parent.

 Consolidated return issues • Hypothetical NOL calculations

19

Tax sharing agreement

 Tax sharing agreement (TSA) • Benefits of loss versus separate entity • Systematic, rational and consistent approach required • 12.c. – taxes recoverable may not exceed amount the reporting entity could reasonably expect to have refunded by parent • Q&A 8.2 – taxes paid by reporting entity represent maximum admissible DTAs; amount can be reduced pursuant to TSA • Must settle taxes timely • TSA can hurt or be neutral for admissibility calculation

20

Tax sharing agreement

 Example 1: • LifeCo is a member of HoldCo’s consolidated group • LifeCo reported taxable income of $1 mil in each of last three years • Under TSA, LifeCo paid its parent $350,000 for each of last three years • LifeCo reports a $3 mil loss for the current year • Holdco and subs reported consolidated losses in each of last three years and would not be able to file obtain tax refunds by filing carryback claims to any of those years(Forms 1139) • TSA provides that tax refunds are allocated to the entities that had losses which resulted in the claim • LifeCo would not be able to admit DTAs under 11.a. based on the taxes it paid to HoldCo in prior three years 21

Tax sharing agreement

 Example 2: • LifeCo is a member of HoldCo’s consolidated group • LifeCo reported taxable loss of $1 mil in each of last three years • LifeCo reports a $3 mil loss for the current year • HoldCo can use LifeCo’s current NOL to offset income of other subsidiaries. • Under TSA, LifeCo gets paid by parent if the consolidated group can utilize LifeCo’s losses • LifeCo has a current year benefit / receivable for its $3 mil loss • No impact on DTAs / Admissibility from TSA

22

Section four

DTA ADMISSIBILITY – PART 2 (PARAGRAPH 11.b.)

RBC/Surplus limitations

 Three-part comparison – Lesser of: • Remaining gross DTA that is reversing within prescribed period • Amount “expected to be realized” • Stated percentage of adjusted capital and surplus

 Know which Realization Threshold Limitation applies • Contingent upon ExDTA RBC ACL ratio • 0 yrs / 0% or 1 yr / 10% or 3 yrs / 15% • Full 3-yr / 15% requires ratio of more than 300% • Adjusted capital and surplus determined as of current period • Know ExDTA ACL RBC percentage

24

Expected to be realized

 Expected to be realized (with and without calculations) • Inherently subjective • Consolidated groups that don’t forecast on a separate entity basis • Reversal patterns consistent with 11.a.

 Projections • Consistency with other projections (i.e. board, ratings agencies, regulators) • Explanation of differences – tax planning strategies • History of strong forecasting?

25

Capital and surplus

 Current year capital and surplus difficulties Draft capital and surplus calculation

26

Changes between threshold limitations

Audit adjustments not accounted for in annual statements

Section five

DTA ADMISSIBILITY – PART 3 (PARAGRAPH 11.c.)

Considerations

28

Practical considerations related to scheduling

Relationship between valuation allowance and 11.c.

Character considerations

Consistency from year to year

Indefinite lived intangible

 Example: Mis-matched DTA / DTL • LifeCo has DTA for tax intangible related to state licenses that reverses over next 15 years • LifeCo can admit DTA for intangible that reverses over the next 3 years under 11.a. • LifeCo’s only DTL is for book basis of these state licenses. However, this DTL is not expected to reverse in the foreseeable future. • Can LifeCo admit the DTA for tax-basis intangible that reverses beyond 3 years under 11.c.? • If LifeCo has large NOLs and determines a valuation allowance is necessary, does the valuation allowance bring the net DTA balance to $0? • What would impact be if LifeCo’s policy were to net as 1 DTA/DTL? 29

Section six

TAX LOSS CONTINGENCIES

Tax loss contingencies

 SSAP 101 Paragraph 3.a. • Establishes more-likely-than-not and reasonably estimated criterion • State income tax loss contingencies accounted for under an unmodified, or probable and reasonably estimated criterion

 Tax loss contingencies • Presumed that the reporting entity will be examined by the relevant taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information • If the estimated tax loss contingency is greater than 50% of the tax benefit originally recognized, the tax loss contingency recorded equal to 100% of the original benefit recognized

31

Tax loss contingencies

 “Gross-up” considerations • Tax loss contingencies related to temporary differences • Triggering event • Notice of proposed adjustment • Information document request

• Possible surplus impact

32

Section seven

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

Surplus considerations

 Review surplus for: • Items that affect tax return • Prior period adjustments

 Deferred components adjusted through surplus: • Change in net deferred tax asset • Change in nonadmitted asset • Change in unrealized gain/(loss) • Prior period adjustments • Foreign exchange gain/(loss)

34

AMT considerations

 Current calculation • When coming out of NOLs, remember AMT NOL limited to 90% of AMTI (possible 2008 / 2009 exception) • Creates AMT credit carryforward

 Admissibility calculation • Effect of AMT on carryback potential • Reversals of AMT credit carryforwards • Utilization of AMT credit in with and without calculation

 May be more than current / deferred flip • DTA may not be admissible 35

Effective tax rate reconciliation

 Performed on total basis, not just current  Current taxes include both ordinary and capital taxes  Includes – • Change in gross DTA related to statement of operations • Change in nonadmitted assets included in deferred inventory

 Nonpublic ASC 740 disclosures  Final check to make sure tax provision works 36

Current tax receivable  Verify components of ending balance • Not just a rollforward of prior year end balance

 Analyze all components for admissibility • Check current receivable for admissibility • Not just deferred tax asset

 Example: • Under TSA, entity projected tax benefit in 2013 at provision • Set up current tax receivable from parent • 2013 tax return filed 9/15/2014 • At 12/31/2014, receivable from parent still outstanding • Should the receivable be nonadmitted? 37

Section eight

BEST PRACTICES

Best practices – Before year end

 Don’t rely solely on mechanical formulas  Build in cross-checks/proofs within template  Confirm expectations regarding exDTA ACL RBC percentages before quarter close  Confirm expectations regarding capital and surplus before quarter close

39

Best practices – During provision

 Use rate reconciliation to verify “total” tax • Not useful in assessing accuracy of current expense

 Compare reversal patterns from year to year  Review draft financial statements before calculation is final  Perform high-level analysis of tax footnote

40

Best practices – Planning  Be aware of changes expected in taxable income • Separate company and consolidated group

 Be aware of amended returns, RARs, etc. that could change prior year taxes paid under paragraph 11.a. • Consider gross-up for temporary tax loss contingencies

 Understand impact that affiliates entering or leaving group will have on taxes recoverable  Analyze potential changes in admissibility in future quarters • Determine if significant increases or decreases are anticipated in capital and surplus, and RBC percentages 41

Section nine

TAX REFORM

Tax reform – Implications for SSAP 101

 Tax Reform Act of 2014 • Presented by Rep. Camp (R – MI) on 2/21/14 • Significant insurance-related provisions

 Decrease in corporate tax rates over a number of years • Calculation of DTAs and DTLs – scheduling? • Mismatch between current and deferred impact • Surplus impact for companies with net admitted DTA

 Life company NOL carryback period reduced from three to two years • Limits ability to admit DTAs under 11.a. 43

Tax reform – Implications for SSAP 101

 Increase to DAC capitalization percentages • Increases current tax expense without equal increase in DTA

 Accounting method changes for reserves (Sec. 807(f)) • Accelerates DTA reversal for reserve strengthening from 10 years to one year.

44

Disclosure

Pursuant to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, nothing contained in this communication was intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose. No one, without our express prior written permission, may use or refer to any tax advice in this communication in promoting, marketing, or recommending a partnership or other entity, investment plan, or arrangement to any other party. Baker Tilly refers to Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, an independently owned and managed member of Baker Tilly International. The information provided here is of a general nature and is not intended to address specific circumstances of any individual or entity. In specific circumstances, the services of a professional should be sought. © 2014 Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP 45

Contact information

 Jeanine Kissinger, CPA, MT, Director, Tax Nationwide Insurance 614 677 2781 [email protected]

 Aaron Maguire, CPA, Partner Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP 404 575 8960 [email protected]

 Carrie Small, CPA, Director, Tax Baker Tilly Virchow Krause LLP 414 777 5451 [email protected] 46

Please complete the Session Evaluation Form on the conference app and include your conference Registration ID# to be included in a drawing for a free conference registration for the 2014 Annual Conference! NOTE: Your conference Registration ID# is located at the bottom left hand corner of your badge. IASA 86TH ANNUAL EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCE & BUSINESS SHOW

Suggest Documents