Risk Assessed QC Plan i-STAT Lactate POC Forum July 31, 2014 Lou Ann Wyer, MS, MT(ASCP), CQA (ASQ) Sentara Healthcare
1
Case Study for Risk Assessed QC Plan Sentara POC Program 350 i-STATs 12 facilities Lactate, POC method Lactic acidosis - forerunner of major medical illnesses
High mortality rate
values > 4mmol/L 2
Measuring System Information Medical Requirements for the Test Results
Regulatory and Accreditation Requirements
Measuring System Information: •Provided by the manufacturer •Obtained by the Laboratory
Information about Health Care and Test Site Setting
PROCESS: Risk Assessment Corrective and Preventive Action and Continual Improvement
OUTPUT: Quality Control Plan
PROCESS: Post-implementation Monitoring
CLSI. Laboratory Quality Control Based on Risk Management; Approved Guideline. CLSI document EP23-A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2011.
3
Types of QC in our QC Toolbox Quality Program Element
Strengths
Weaknesses
Does My System Have This?
LQC Liquid based quality control materials
Readily available Sequestered lot number Long out-date Ranges already established Know if performance is acceptable
Cost
Yes, LQC materials provided by the manufacturer Establish in-house ranges Perform 1H/1L each analyzer monthly
Function Checks
Internal and automatic Monitors electronics of test system Quality checks prevent reporting of results
May not monitor the entire process (i.e., sample) Does not detect hemolysis or interferences
Yes, except for hemolysis index and interferences
Calibration Verification
Identifies that calibrators, reagents, instrument, and calibration algorithm are working
Labor intensive
Yes, material provided by manufacturer Perform with each new/replacement device Perform on each cartridge type twice per year
Proficiency Testing
Confirms proper technique by testing personnel Confirms proper operations of test system
Does not carry over to individual patient samples
Yes, provided by CAP 40 measurements (2011)
4
Types of QC in our QC Toolbox Internal ProficiencyMethod Comparisons
Identification of Implausible Values
New employee orientation
Confirms comparison of methods for random selected tests Ensures POC method is aligned with lab method or another analyzer
Informs operator/POCC of results outside established ranges Software rules stop values from automatically posting to the chart
All new employees who will be using test system Direct observations Conducted by POCC for consistency Identify learners who need more 1:1 First impressions of POCT
Does not carry over to each patient test (unit-use)
Yes, conducted by POCC Perform patient sample for each sensor type monthly Perform LQC for each analyzer monthly
Does not determine reason for value (operator, specimen, etc) May delay results from getting to chart
POCC monitors daily
Resource heavy
Yes, conducted by POCC
5
Information for Risk Assessment Regulatory and Accreditation Standards Measuring system Literature Search Lab and testing unit information Medical requirements for test results Known interferences
6
Process Map Method Validation: precision, accuracy, methods, reference ranges, procedures
Medical Director approval
Test System Ready
Operator training and competency
MD order/protocol in EMR Equipment and supply acquisition and storage Collect Venipuncture Sample
Patient identification
Label Specimen
START
Charge cartridge
Evaluate Results
Yes
No
Evaluate Results
Scan operator, patient ID and cartridge pouch Select test/panel
Troubleshoot
System quality check code? No
Repeat test
Send specimen to the Laboratory for testing
Match clinical picture? Yes
Release results to EMR
END
7
Fishbone Diagram – POC Lactate Samples
Sample Integrity: -Collection Technique -Hemolysis -Correct tube/fill -Time to test -Specimen Labeling -Interferents
Operators Operator Capacity: Sample Preparation: -Orientation/Training -Competency -Mix well prior to loading -Correct cartridge type Data Entry: -Sample type -Bubbles -Test Select -Over/under fill -Cartridge handling Operator Staffing
Identify Potential Hazards Cartridge, QC Materials: -Shipping -Storage -Expired -Preparation/handling -Acceptance -Availability Cal Ver Materials: -Shipping -Storage -Expired -Preparation/handling
Reagents
Measuring System Instrument Failure: -Dead Battery -EQC failure -Software failure -Quality check codes
Maintenance Failure: -Pin Conditioning -Blood/liquid contamination
Incorrect/Delayed Test Result
Atmospheric Environment: -Temperature -Humidity -Dust
Utility Environment: -Electrical -IT/networks
Instrument availability
Lab Environment
8
TEST SYSTEM: Point-of-Care Whole Blood Lactate
Means of Failure Detection
Engineering Controls Operator Training Are there Can operators reduce manufacturer checks or detect failures to reduce the through training? probability of failure?
General Comments or Other LaboratoryImplemented Monitor What other processes can the laboratory implement to detect failure?
Mandatory Observations Operator ID during training required for trained sessions staff
Operator Lockout/warning
PLMS modules Certified trainers
PLMS transcripts POCT Database
Mandatory Safety Habits Operator ID Direct required for trained Observations staff
Operator Lockout/warning
PLMS modules Certified observers/Skills Operator ID
PLMS transcripts Skills Fairs POCT Database
Steps List the stage or aspect of the test system’s process under investigation.
Failure Mode List all manners in which failure could occur in this step.
Causes List all causes of the failure mode that have the potential to produce incorrect test results.
Internal Controls Are there internal biological or procedural controls to detect failure?
Operator Training and Competency
Capacity
Orientation/ Training
Competency
External Controls Can external controls increase the probability to detect failure?
9
TEST SYSTEM: Point-of-Care Whole Blood Lactate
Means of Failure Detection
Steps List the stage or aspect of the test system’s process under investigation.
Failure Mode List all manners in which failure could occur in this step.
Measuring Instrument System Failure Error Message or Malfunction
Engineering Causes Internal Controls External Controls Controls Operator Training List all causes of the Are there internal Can external controls Are there Can operators reduce failure mode that biological or increase the manufacturer checks or detect failures have the potential to procedural controls to probability to detect to reduce the through training? produce incorrect test detect failure? failure? probability of failure? results.
General Comments or Other LaboratoryImplemented Monitor What other processes can the laboratory implement to detect failure?
Electronic instability
Internal QC performed every 8 hrs. FAIL message displays on screen
External electronic simulator performed as needed
Lock-out for failures
Train operators to perform external simulator when needed. Contact POCC for assistance.
POCC’s review EQC results daily
Dead Battery
Battery status displayed on analyzer screen
NA
Battery status displayed on analyzer screen
Train operators to routinely observe battery status.
Two 9-volt lithium batteries, or rechargeable battery available in the laboratory
Quality Check Codes
Each code is indicative of a type of error
No
Guardian reports
Contact POCC for assistance. Review troubleshooting tips with operators.
Train POCC's on software applications and identification/followup to quality check codes. Review quality check codes monthly for trending.10
Residual Risk Assessment TEST SYSTEM: Point-of-Care Whole Blood Lactate
Targeted Failure Mode (Hazard)
Measuring System Feature or Recommended Action
Known Limitation of Feature or Recommended Action
Control Process Effective?
The IQCP Actions Required to Address Known Limitations
Residual Risk Acceptable? (Yes/No)
Operator Competency
Operator Lock-out (mandatory Operator ID required for trained staff)
Provide multiple forms of competency to address testing & QC procedures, maintenance, troubleshooting, proficiency samples
Y
Y
Temp control card with a four-window indicator to monitor temp during transit.
Perform LQC with each shipment
Y
Operator Lock-out QC Lock-out Transmission Lockout Skills Fairs PLMS interactive modules Direct Observations Proficiency testing Results review Perform LQC # and patient samples with each shipment
Shipping (Cartridges)
Y
11
Data to Justify QC Plan LQC Old lot vs. new lot Acceptance studies Internal proficiency with patient samples CAP acceptable limits
12
Delta Lactate
Scatterplot of Delta Lactate vs Lactate Old Lot 1.0
1
0.5
0.5
0.0
0
-0.5
-0.5
-1.0
-1 2
4
6
8 10 12 Lactate Old Lot
14
16
Old Lot Number T10330 Y10352 Y11074 Y11167
18 13
i-STAT Lactate QA by Risk Management Power Analysis Power Curve for Paired t Test 1.00 0.95
Sample Size 3 4 5 6
0.80
A ssumptions A lpha 0.05 S tDev 0.13 A lternativ e N ot =
Power
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
-1.0
-0.5
0.0 Difference (mmol/L)
0.5
1.0 14
i-STAT Lactate Proficiency Testing with Laboratory Instrument 16
Fits Regress Lowess
14
Lot Number T10330 W11245 Y10352 Y11074 Y11146 Y11167
i-STAT (mmol/L)
12 10
OLS
Lowess
8 6 4 2 0 0
2
4
6 8 10 12 Laboratory Method (mmol/L)
14
16 15
i-STAT Lactate QA by Risk Management Power Analysis Control Level 1 Power Curve for 2-Sample t Test 1.00 0.95
Sample Size 3 6
0.80
A ssumptions A lpha 0.05 S tDev 0.2 A lternativ e N ot =
Power
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
-1.0
-0.5
0.0 Difference
0.5
1.0 16
Lactate Testing – QCP QC Toolbox Electronic QC
Acceptance studies
Monthly LQC Calibration Verification
QC Plan
Every 8 hours QC, Operator, Transmission Lock-outs 2H/2L, 5 patients with each shipment
4H/4L (min), each cartridge type 3 levels in triplicate, every 6 months 17
Lactate Testing – QCP QC Toolbox
QCP
Internal proficiency for comparative methods
External Proficiency program
New/replacement devices
1 patient monthly for each sensor type vs Lab analyzer CAP survey sets
LQC (2 H/2 L x10) Patient sample (1) Calibration verification (3 levels in triplicate) 18
Lactate Testing – QCP QC Toolbox Orientation/Training Competency
QCP
Provided by POCCs Interactive PLMS Direct Observations Proficiency surveys Skills Fairs Results review
19
Post-Implementation Monitoring Evaluate the effectiveness Unacceptable findings?
Troubleshoot Determine cause Assess the risk to the patient Corrective action
Modify QC Plan to prevent recurrence
Document, document, document 20
Lessons Learned Start early Consider all current processes Review current data Monitor for effectiveness
Q&A
Questions?
22