RESEARCH DESIGNS Janice Long, PhD, RN Patricia Hart, PhD, RN
Definition of Design • Research design is the master plan that
guides and holds together all the major parts of the research project to address the central research questions. • samples or groups • measures • treatments or programs • time elements
Choosing a Design • The research problem dominates the design. • The design you choose is based on the problem or research
question you want to answer and how much you know about the problem.
Research Problem/Question
Data
Methods
Basics of Design Quantitative
Qualitative
Objective Deductive Generalizable
Subjective Inductive Not generalizable (transferrable) Uses Words
Uses Numbers
Mixed Methods Can use parts of both
Types of Design Exploratory
Descriptive
• Clarify the
• Answers
problem • Define terms • Get background information • Establish research priorities
questions about who, what, when, where and how. • Two basic types: • Cross- Sectional • Longitudinal
Causal •
If the program or treatment is given, then the outcome occurs
Or •
If the program/treatment is not given, then the outcome does not occur • Answers question about why
Exploratory Design • May be quantitative or qualitative • Secondary Data Analysis • Focus Groups • Case Analyses • Surveys • Interviews
Descriptive Design • Does not include researcher imposed treatments • Examines variables in their natural environment • Time • Cross-Sectional Studies measure across one point in time
• Longitudinal Studies measure across time
• Correlation • Comparison across groups • Comparison within groups
Causal • Experimental • Examines cause and effect • Uses random assignment to groups • Quasi-experimental • Random assignment to groups is not used but a control group or multiple measures used
Trochim & Donnelly, 2009
Threats to Validity in Quantitative Studies • Internal Validity • The extent to which it is possible to make an inference that the independent variable, rather than another factor, is truly causing variation in the dependent variable1,p.244 • Meaning • Has to do with how the study was set up and conducted including how the participants were selected and “managed” once they were in the study
Threats to Validity in Quantitative Studies • External Validity • The extent to which it can be inferred that relationships observed in a study hold true over variations in people, conditions, and settings, as well as over variations in treatments and outcomes1,p350 • Meaning • Has to do with our ability to say if the researchers’ findings would be useful with a similar group or people, This is called generalizability
Threats to Internal Validity Threat
What it means
What kind of study is most likely to be effected
Strategies
Temporal Ambiguity
Is the independent variable really coming before the dependent variable
Comparative & correlational designs
Understanding of the variables under study
History
The occurrence of external events that take place concurrently with the IV, and that can affect the outcomes.
Longitudinal & Repeated Measures studies.
Randomization Control group
Maturation
Processes occurring within participants during the course of the study as a result of the passage of time rather than as a result of the IV. Participants get older, wiser, more depressed, more hungry, more tired.
Longitudinal studies where the participants are more likely to change such as adolescents, infants, or people who are quite ill.
Randomization Control group
Threats to Internal Validity Threat
What it means
What kind of study is most likely to be effected
Strategies
Testing
Occurs when a pretest influences the way subjects respond on a post test.
Repeated measures or a pretest-post-test design
Control group
Instrumentation
Changes made in the way the variable is measured, i.e, BP. Data collectors get better or worse at what they are doing.
Physiologic instruments or those in which researchers are collecting the data in person.
Regular calibration, use of multiple observers, training of observers establishment of reliability, validity, and objectivity of measurement procedures
Threats to Internal Validity Threat
What it means
What kind of study is most likely to be effected
Strategies
Selection
Pre-existing differences Quasi-experimental studies between the participants and convenience samples. selected for a study or those who volunteer for the study & those not in the study.
Random selection Random assignment Control group
Mortality/Attrition
Participants drop out of a study or are lost to follow up
Subject matching & omission
Longitudinal studies.
Threats to External Validity Threat
What it means
What kind of study is most likely to be effected
Strategies
Reactivity
The influence of participating in a study on the responses of subjects. (Hawthorne effect: Participants’ behaviors affected by personal values or desires t please the experimenter). Researcher may inadvertently affect how intervention conducted or how they interact with participants.
Any study with pre-test.
Inform the subjects of their roles, Double-blind experimental designs
Effects of Selection
Sample does not reflect the general population
Convenience samples
Randomization
Threats to External Validity Threat
What it means
What kind of study is most likely to be effected
Strategies
Interaction of Treatment & Selection of Subjects
Where the independent variable might not affect individuals the same way
Convenience samples
Random selection Random assignment Control group Subject matching
Interaction of Treatment & Setting
When the intervention in one setting cannot be generalized using the same intervention
Studies related to the same phenomenon which used similar types of hospitals
Use diverse sample populations when conducting studies
Interaction of Treatment & History
When external events affect the intervention
Studies in which the intervention is likely to have changed or the targeted populations may have changed
Randomization Control group Replication studies
QUESTIONS
References • Norwood, S. L. (2009). Research essentials: Foundations
for evidence-based practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. (9th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins. • Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2012). Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research (2nd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning • Trochim & Donnelly (2009) The research methods knowledge base. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/destypes.php