Recycling of Cleaning Fluids to Meet Green Cleaning Process Targets

Recycling of Cleaning Fluids to Meet Green Cleaning Process Targets By Steve Stach Austin American Technology     Setting recycling targets? Pa...
Author: Dulcie McCoy
4 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size
Recycling of Cleaning Fluids to Meet Green Cleaning Process Targets By Steve Stach Austin American Technology

   

Setting recycling targets? Paying for recycling? What can be recycled? Review of the 4 basic types of fluid recycling    



Absorption Distillation Filtration Replenishment

Estimating the cost and saving  Estimating system life  Cost Model review



Government Regulations  Few direct mandates  Significant cost/liability regarding waste;

i.e. generation, storage, transportation, disposal 

Corporate Directives  Avoid liability by not generating

 Cut manufacturing expenses  Marketing “Green Manufacturing” sells product

   

Water Saving – up to 99% reduction Chemical Savings – 50-99% reduction Energy Saving – 10-50% reduction Waste Disposal – 50-90% reduction



Water

Just about everything!

 Tap, DI



Water Mixtures, Neutral pH  Buffered aqueous mixtures



Water Mixtures, Alkaline

 Emulsions, Homogenous mixtures



Organic, nonflammable  Halogenated solvents



Organic, combustible  Glycols, oils, esters



Organic, Flammable  Alcohols, light hydrocarbons

1. It depends on the Solvent 2. It depends on what is happening in the solvent?

Alkaline/Saponifier Water/Emulsion Organic Solvent

Reacting w/Soils Accumulating Soils Evaporation

Identify & Understand Your Recycling Method Recycling System Choices Recycle Method

Used with

Waste stream

Waste disposal handler

System Complexity level

Safety concern

Chemical addition

Reactive Aqueous Mixtures (saponifiers)

Soil loaded tank dump

Company

Technician

Medium

Ion Exchange

Rinse water Alcohols Glycols Esters

Depleted DI resins

Third party

Operator

Low

Carbon Adsorption

Rinse water

Carbon media with organics

Third party

Operator

Low

Zeolite Absorption

NPB CFC’s HCFC’s

Zeolite with adsorbed contaminate

Third party

Operator

Low

Chelation

Water with heavy metals

Chelation media with heavy metals

Third party

Operator

Low

Distillation

NPB CFC’s HCFC’s

Non volatile residues

Company

Technician

High

Filtration

All fluids

Filters with contaminate

Company

Technician

Medium

Reverse Osmosis

Rinse water

Reject fluid stream

Company

Technician

Medium

Cleaning/Rinsing Agent

Adsorption

Distillation

Filtration

Replenish Ingredient

Water Only

Recommend for high purity

Rarely Used

Recommended for General use

Not Used

Water + additive, Neutral pH

Not Used

Not Used

Recommended for General use

Recommend

Water Alkaline

Not Used

Not Used

Recommended for General use

Recommend

Organic Non-flammable

Used

Recommend

Recommended for General use

Not Used

Organic Combustible

Recommend

Used

Recommended for General use

Not Used

Organic Flammable

Recommend

Used

Recommended for General use

Not Used

H2O IPA

NPB



Key Ingredient Replacement  Common in aqueous mixture to replace drag out

or reactive losses ▪ Saponifing agents ▪ Degreasing stabilizers



Filtration  Use of filters to remove soils



Distillation  Removes contaminates with higher boiling points



Absorption  Use of Carbon, DI resins, Zeolites and other Media to Adsorb contaminates

 

One of the oldest recycling methods Configuration  Cartridge, Bag, Plate, Cake



Filter Size  1to10 micron typical



Design Type  Mono or Multi-Filament  Absolute vs Standard



Recommended uses  Used in most closed or open loop cleaning systems



Boiling fluid is vaporized and condensed



High boiling soils are left behind for disposal



Recommended for nonflammable, single solvents or azeotropic solvent blends



Not usually recommended for water or flammable solvents



Ionic soils are captured by ion exchange resins



Cations (Na+, K+,NH3+) are removed by cationic exchange resins



Anions (OA-, Br-,CO3-) are removed by anionic exchange resins



Mixed Beds remove both Anions and Cations



Recommended for purifying water and most organic solvents



Not recommended for solutions containing amines





RO is most commonly used for feed water generation to closed loop cleaners RO typical removed ~90% of dissolved solids from tap water



Molecular sized microscopic pores block large molecules and allow smaller molecules to pass

  



Absorptive medias capture metal ions Cations (Pb+2, Ag+2,Cu+2) are captured by cationic exchange resins GAC can do the same Use new GAC and DI media or find regenerator with metal cheatlation system

 

   

A molecular sieve traps molecular soils in microscopic pores. Naturally occurring materials are referred to as zeolites Man made materials are called molecular sieve. Molecular sieve comes in different pore sizes ranging from 3 to 12 angstrom Commonly used as a desiccant Available in round or extruded pellets



Useful in removing water, flux residues, and most ions from organic cleaning solvents

35X

700X

4,500X



Molecular Sieve filters to remove contamination from  Degreasing Solvents  Organic solvents



Organic soils are captured by Granular Activated Carbon (GAC)



Works on basis that “Like attracts Like”



Capacity depends on the molecule



Often used in conjunction with DI closed loop systems Carbon Exhaustion Foams Rinse



 



GAC is made by anaerobic heating organic material to drive off all volatiles Most GAC is acid washed to remove acid soluble impurities Coconut shell and anthracite coal are two type that product low powdering GAC can be partially regenerated by steam stripping – not recommended

Compound

Mole Weight

Water Solubility %

Adsorption g soil/ g GAC

Adsorption % reduction

2-ethyl butanol

102.2

0.43

.170

85.5%

Mono-ethanol amine

61.1



.015

7.2%

Di-ethanol amine

105.1

95.4

.057

27.5%

Nitro-benzene

123.1

0.19

.196

95.6%

Butyric acid

88.1



.119

59.5%

Ethylene glycol mono butyl ether

118.2



0.112

55.9%

Test solution1g/liter

Mass Balance analysis looks at all materials entering and leaving the cleaning process.  Shows where you are loosing or gaining fluids/ingredients 

Fluid Feed, Make-up

Parts

Mist-Evaporative And Drag-Out Losses

w/soils

Fluid Tank

Recycling System

Waste

Cleaning System

Cleaning Fluid With Soils Sewer or Disposal

Vent

Dry FilterMΏ GAC Mixed Carbon

Turbine

Rinse 1g/m

1g/m

Wash

The impact of the recycling location

The impact of the recycling location

Chem pump MΏ GAC Filter Mixed Turbine Carbon ~25gallons 1g/m 1g/m

In Situ (in the cleaner)

Plant System (in the factory)

Third party (bonded & licensed)



The Local Sewer Plant  Check with local water authorities  A permit may be requires



The DI Guy  What materials do they use? ▪ Source, new or regenerated?  How do they dispose of the waste?



Solvent Recycler/Disposal  Use EPA licensed & bonded company  Cradle to grave responsibility

Indep

Process Data

Inline Open Loop

Closed Loop Central System

Varib

Equipment cost

$200,000

$200,000

$200,000

DI system system cost

$25,000

$35,000

$5,000

Shipping

$5,000

$5,000

$4,000

Water consumption rate gph (operating)

300

10

10

Cost of water $'s/gal

$0.01

$0.01

$0.01

Cost to regenerate DI (1.5Ft3)

$300.00

$500.00

$500.00

Water purity (dissolved solids) mg/gal

250

20

20

Final rinse rate GPM

5

5

5

Power cost $s/Khr

$0.10

$0.10

$0.10

Operating KW (KV*A)

100

110

75

Inline Cleaner Cost Model

7

year equipment amortization

6

Run time per Shift

300

In Situ Closed Loop

Shifts per year Process Costs ($'s/hr) Absorbtive capacity (mg CaCO3 or Succinate) Bed Life (hrs of operation)

1,680,000

7,900,000

7,900,000

3.7

219.4

219.4



Depends on the Ion 



Molecular weight & valance

Tank Absorptive Capacity (Abtotal)  Bed Volume (Vab)  Absorptive Capacity (Abcap) (Abtotal) = (Abcap) X (Vab)

US map showing water hardness



Contamination Feed Rate  Mass Flow Rate (MFrate) Bedlife = (Abtotal / MFrate)x %factor*

* %factor is % available in begining + % remaining at exhaustion

Inline Open Loop Annual Cost of beds OL DI, CL DI+GAC

Closed Loop Central System

In Situ Closed Loop

$144,642.86

$4,101.27

$4,101.27

$80.36

$2.28

$2.28

$3.00

$0.10

$0.10

Power costs/hr

$15.00

$16.50

$11.25

Total Power and water cost $/hr

$98.36

$18.88

$13.63

Equipment Amortization cost per hr

$16.43

$17.14

$14.93

$114.79

$36.02

$28.56

Hourly Cost of beds Hourly cost of tap water

Total Equipment + Water + Power ($/hr)

Saves $85/hr

  

All cleaning solvents can be recycled There are many methods of recycling Your clean solvent guides you recycling method

Government and industry are driving recycling  Cost and environmental benefits provide the rewards for conversion  The savings are easy to estimate with a good mass and energy balance diagram 





The location of the recycling system can affect cost. In situ recycling is the most cost effective



If you are not recycling your cleaning fluids, you should be!

"Cleaning Fluid Recycling Options for Green Manufacturing” by

Steve Stach

Thank You for Attending Questions ?

Suggest Documents