Qualitative Research
Definitions Quantitative
Research - investigation in which the researcher attempts to understand some larger reality by isolating and measuring components of that reality without regard to their contextual setting. Qualitative Research - investigation in which the researcher attempts to understand some larger reality by examining it in a holistic way or by examining components of that reality within their contextual setting.
Different Ways of Looking at Things Quantitative
Positivistic Epistemological basis is Realism Dates to the Age of Enlightenment
Qualitative
Naturalistic (Post-Positivistic [PRE?]) Epistemological basis is Idealism Dates informally to prehistoric times Formally to ancient Greece
Quantitative Research Reality
is independent of human understanding Reality can be defined as separate and observable variables Goal of research is to define and measure those variables Most accurate way to measure variables is individually and in isolation We understand reality by defining all the pertinent variables
Qualitative Research Human
understanding and interpretation define reality Complex reality can be understood only as amalgam and not as simply a sum of its parts Goal of research is to examine complex phenomena to define the reality within To be meaningful, inquiry must be holistic and contextual
Researchers Argue Quantitative
researchers fail because they can neither adequately define nor accurately measure enough of the variables to understand complex natural interactions.
Qualitative
researchers cannot rigorously examine the detailed structures underlying complex natural interactions.
Researchers Argue “Purists”
contend
Qualitative and quantitative methodologies are incompatible because they have different epistemological bases. Using them together is “mixing paradigms.”
Others
believe
Qualitative and quantitative methodologies are simply different ways of looking at phenomena Using them together is symbiotic
Characteristics of Qualitative Research Purpose
is understanding Oriented toward discovery Uses subjective data Extracts meaning from data Interprets results in context Focus is holistic
Advantages of Qualitative Research In-depth
Examination of Phenomena Uses subjective information Not limited to rigidly definable variables Examine complex questions that can be impossible with quantitative methods Deal with value-laden questions Explore new areas of research Build new theories
Disadvantages of Qualitative Research Subjectivity
leads to procedural problems Replicability is very difficult Researcher bias is built in and unavoidable In-depth, comprehensive approach to data gathering limits scope Labor intensive, expensive Not understood well by “classical” researchers
Organizational Structures Historical
Analysis Ethnography Phenomenology Life History, Chronology, Historiography Case Study
Historical Analysis Archival
Research
Primary Documents Secondary Sources
Artifacts Relics Oral
Histories
Ethnography External
Observation Passive Observation Balanced Participation Observation Participant Observation
Life History, Chronology, Historiography Archival/Historical Personal
Journals
Written Journals Electronic Journals
Electronic
Media Long Term Observation Interviews
Case Study Detailed,
in-depth examination of a person, group, or setting Multiple data sources, perspectives Focus is on the individual or group, not the population Meaning is extracted from observation Findings are instructive, not generalizable
Holistic Approach Researcher
seeks a complete picture of a total, complex situation There may be no attempt to isolate specific variables or to answer specific questions If specific questions are asked, the answers are sought within the context in which the phenomena naturally occur.
Internal Validity Validity
is primarily a positivistic concept In qualitative research, equates to credibility The right setting and informants Accurate reflection of situation, informant perceptions Multiple approaches lead to similar results Multiple researchers yield similar interpretations Peer review/Informant review
External Validity In
qualitative research, equates to transferability Transferability is responsibility of reader, not researcher Provide dense description Use nominated informant sample Provide detailed demographic and situational description
To Seek Validity
(Wolcott, 1990)
(Think Credibility, Transferability) Listen
and observe carefully Be candid Record accurately Begin writing report early Use primary data in report Use all data for final report Seek feedback Seek balance Write accurately
Reliability Reliability
is primarily a positivistic concept Reliability in qualitative research equates to dependability Different researchers reach similar interpretations Repeated examinations produce similar observations Multiple researchers produce similar interpretations of the same data
Triangulation Multiple
perspectives, data sources, researchers, data collection techniques Strongest evidence for credibility, dependability, transferability Concept originated in navigation Navigation using known points The more known points/angles, the more accurate the “fix” on the unknown location
Corroboration Multiple
informants hold similar perceptions Same informant responds consistently to related questions An attempt to confirm consistency of perception not accuracy of perception
Constant Comparison Collect
and analyze initial data Develop tentative conclusions, hypotheses, themes Collect and analyze additional data Test against initial conclusions, hypotheses, themes Seek new perspectives, data sources Write, re-write, re-assess, re-write, etc...
Discovery Approach to Qualitative Research
Identify
setting to be studied Conduct initial data collection Analyze for emerging themes Formulate tentative questions, hypotheses, theses Focus subsequent data collection to test/expand initial themes Questions, themes, hypotheses, theories EMERGE from the research
Analytic Induction Approach to Qualitative Research Define
specific questions Define setting Identify informants Collect initial data Develop initial hypothesis
Analytic Induction Approach to Qualitative Research Collect
additional data to test fit of hypothesis Redefine questions or reformulate hypothesis based on further data collection and analysis Search for negative case to disprove hypothesis
Qualitative Research: A Different Way of Looking at the World Naturalistic Holistic Contextual Rich In-depth Reality
derived not measured
Unstructured Interview Define
basic goal Select setting for comfort of informant Try to establish rapport, trust Gently guide discussion toward goal Pursue profitable leads, tangents Make careful notes or electronic recording during interview if practicable as soon afterward as possible otherwise
Structured Interview Define
precise objectives Develop, validate, field test interview schedule (protocol) Select setting for comfort of informant Try to establish rapport, trust Initiate interview using protocol Focus on specifics of protocol
Structured Interview Do
not accept yes/no responses, probe for more Pursue profitable tangents Remain flexible to encourage informant to talk Gently guide informant through protocol Make careful notes or electronic recording during interview if practicable as soon afterward as possible otherwise
Focus Group Define
goals Select participants Establish rapport Initiate discussion Encourage free discussion, but Guide discussion toward the goals Avoid contaminating discussion with own biases
Ethnographic Observation Identify
Goals Select site Establish rapport Determine critical informants Make detailed field notes Begin writing report from the start Observations external, passive, balanced, or participant