Promoting interest in mathematics and science Arthur Bakker Freudenthal Institute Universiteit Utrecht
[email protected]
Overview
1. Importance of math and science 2. What is interest? 3. Interest in math and science 4. How to promote interest?
Including results from a meta-analysis
STEM: science, technology, engineering and mathematics
2
1. Importance of math and science (STEM) • citizenship, democracy (cryptography/security, •
genetic testing, genetic modification…) Worldwide shortage of STEM graduates
• Aim of Dutch Masterplan on STEM: from 25% in 2011 to 40% in 2020
8/25/2016
3
Students’ first encounters?
Pat and Mat (a je to!)
Bob the Builder 8/25/2016
4
Barbapapas (30+ languages)
8/25/2016
5
Barbabenno (one out of seven)
8/25/2016
6
Who could also become interested in STEM?
8/25/2016
7
Case study of a Barbabee-type student Penelope: animal friend - Knew a lot about pets - Her activities were inquiry-based - No connection to school science - Disliked science at school despite mother’s attempts to make connections Zimmerman (2012, Journal for Research in Science Teaching)
8/25/2016
8
Groups of students • Low or average in STEM still important for •
scientific literacy and citizenship High interest and sufficient ability help them develop interest and ability to have opportunities at labor market
Provide all with realistic image of future study and work, and how STEM plays a role in society
8/25/2016
9
2. Interest • Positive effects on: learning processes and • •
results, attention, focus, memory, persistence, effort… good for everything! Important factor in educational choices (next to job opportunities) Best predictor of study success (Maltese & Tai, 2011)
Boredom and lack of challenge problematic for talented and interested students
8/25/2016
10
What is interest? Family similarities with: motivation, curiosity, attitude, engagement, enjoyment but: • Directed on content (ideas, objects…) • More sustainable than curiosity • Less dualistic than attitude: interest stems from Latin “inter esse” (being in between)
8/25/2016
11
Definition interest Interest … refers to the psychological state of engaging or the predisposition to reengage with particular classes of objects, events, or ideas over time Hidi & Renninger (2006, Educational Psychologist)
8/25/2016
12
How is interest promoted? Sometimes one key event is reported as igniting it
8/25/2016
13
But mostly Interest development is a gradual process requiring regular food, attention and an encouraging environment
8/25/2016
14
Four-phase model (Hidi and Renninger) 1. Triggered situational interest: externally
supported 2. Maintained situational interest: sustained through meaningful tasks and supporting environment 3. Emerging individual interest: self-generated, requiring external support 4. Well-developed individual interest: selfgenerated, perseverence
8/25/2016
15
3. Interest in STEM • Sparks mostly already in primary school • Decline in adolescence Boys more interested in computer science, mathematics, physics, technology Girls in biology, biochemistry
8/25/2016
16
Interest in math
Frenzel et al (2010) 8/25/2016
PPT FIsme
17
Frenzel et al. “downward trend … plateaued in later years, with high variability in mean levels, but little variability in the shape of the growth trajectories” N = 3193 German students
8/25/2016
18
4. How to promote interest in STEM?
1.Context; RME example 2.U-Talent: students’ interests 3.Review study
8/25/2016
19
4.1 Realistic Mathematics Education - Context meaningful to students, but also link to -
8/25/2016
authentic, real-world situations and conventional mathematics Dierdorp used professional practices but with younger students other types of context are generally used
20
Authentic professional practices Based education on situations in professional practices in which STEM knowledge is used 1. Sport physiology 2. Dike monitoring 3. Laboratory measurement instruments “I see the use of what I learn”: 75% Dierdorp (2013); Dierdorp, Ba et al. (2011, MTL)
8/25/2016
21
Authentic practice: Dike height monitoring
Measurements by helicopter EXPENSIVE
Sampling task on dike monitoring: could we do with a smaller sample?
4.2 pre-university college Pre-university colleges for STEM interested students - Community: with similar peers (e.g., Higgs) - Challenge: finally addressed at their own level - Differentiation: tailor-made to their interests Junior College Utrecht: highly valued, interest sustained, realistic image of STEM at university, higher study success than similar peers (Disselhorst, 2014; Tromp et al., 2014) 8/25/2016
25
Pre-university students (1-6 scale) Interest
Mean
Mathematics Physics Computer Science Chemistry Biology
4.19 4.65 3.25
Standard Deviation 1.37 1.04 1.49
4.59 4.85
1.01 1.10
1 = not interested; 6 = very interested 8/25/2016
26
Female vs male (N = 181)
8/25/2016
Interest Mathematics
Mean Female 3.79
Mean male 4.64
Physics
4.28
5.08
Computer Science
2.66
3.93
Chemistry
4.43
4.78
Biology
5.13
4.54 27
Components in STEM interests Component Interest Mathematics
8/25/2016
1
2
.770
-.168
Physics
.738
.256
Computer Science
.730
-.028
Chemistry
.292
.827
Biology
-.424
.716
28
App inTin Smartphone application (project with Sanne Akkerman) Every two hours students fill in what they found interest in the last two hours One week, four times per year Four students have completed a full year plus three interviews
8/25/2016
29
Casper Family
Alone
Parents Rita (sister) and Chris (brother)
Judo friends
Music
Gitar
Gaming Computers
Technology
Colleagues post office
Cor, Jonathan, Koen, Tom, Thomas
Judo Soccer Autosport Youth fire brigade
Celbiology Biotechnology
Junior College friends
John en Mark
Secondary School ‘AV’ friends
Oletta, Annette, Susan, Peter
Melvin Oletta, Kylian, Lara, Peter 8/25/2016
30
Casper’s interests At school interested in computers, technology, biotechnology, cell biology At home interested in CSI (crime scene investigation) Chose computer science Chose additional work with social component; continued sports at high level Became interested in legal hacking Considers Police academy program digital forensics: combination of interests master’s in Cyber security 8/25/2016
31
Some conclusions pre-university studies a) These JCU students have multiple interests and engage in many activities b) STEM interest among many other interests (sports, music, social activities…) c) They have ideals: contribute to a better world, have a decent family life, work with people d) Many did not like laboratory work decided to study something else at university Important to understand interest in STEM in students’ wider interest pattern and social lives
8/25/2016
32
4.3 Review studies Emphasis on context, relevance, inquiry, summer camps, trips contributes to positive attitude but not better learning results (Bennett et al., 2006; Potvin & Hasni, 2014)
8/25/2016
33
Meta-analysis: Promoting student interest in math and science Savelsbergh, E. R., Prins, G. T., Rietbergen, C., Fechner, S., Vaessen, B. E., Draijer, J. M., & Bakker, A. (2016). Effects of Innovative Science and Mathematics Teaching on Student Attitudes and Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Study. Educational Research Review. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S 1747938X16300306
8/25/2016
34
Research question of our meta-analysis What are the effects of innovative educational approaches on student attitudes and achievement in science and mathematics?
Approaches (independent variable)
1.Inquiry-based learning (IBL), 2.Context-based education (CON), 3.ICT-based (ICT), 4.Collaborative learning (COLL) 5.Excursions (EXT) 6.other
Attitudes (dependent variable) Attitudes towards MS
Relevance Interest
Personal
Societal
School
Selfefficacy
Leisure
Normality
Career
Method: meta-analyses - Math or science, grades 1-12 - 1989-2014 - Experiment with controle group, pre-posttests of attitudes - Validated attitude instruments - All necessary information for meta-analysis (means, SD, etc)
Meta-analysis Quantitative systematic review
8/25/2016
39
Query
SCOPUS n = 4320
Web of Science n =3408
ERIC N = 1037
PsycINFO N = 685
Deduplicate
N = 6066 Step 1: Surface level screening Step 2: Design check
Kappas fine Step 3: Quality of intervention and measurement
Reject: n = 5533 Accept: n = 533
Pretest and controlgroup:
n = 152 Accept: n = 56
Comparison, no pretest Pretest, no comparison Design otherw. not usable No full text
n = 70 n = 65 n = 242 n=4
Reject: n = 96 65 experiments
Attitudes toward M&S
d = 0.54 0.35 outliers removed
-
Hattie (2009): effect size OK if d >= 0.40 for achievement d >= 0.20 for affect
• (d: difference of means divided by pooled SDs)
Teaching approach - No significant differences between approaches - Larger effects for younger than older students
Achievement does not suffer!
d = 1.07 0.78
Zooming in - Relevance: n = 4, p = .39, -
-
d = 0.15 Interest: n = 20, p = .0096, d = 0.23 Self-efficacy: n = 14, p > .05, d = 0.12 Normality: n = 4, p = .51,
d = 0.16
Interest in M&S in general
d = 0.23
Further zooming in
- Only interest in career
significant: n = 4, p < .05, d = 0.40, CI [0.04-0.76]
Conclusions - Reform approaches positive
influence - Quality of implementation probably most important - Start young enough
5) Overall take home messages a) Interest develops slowly – requires regular
support (perhaps also outside school) b) If you measure interest/attitude use a validated questionnaire and report all relevant details c) Whatever approach: implement it well d) Students (grade 11) value STEM education based on authentic professional practices e) Opportunities to link with students’ ideals? (contact with people, improve the world)
8/25/2016
49
Wish curve:
STEM interest
8/25/2016
TIME
50
Thanks for your interest!
8/25/2016
51
Dierdorp, Adri, Bakker, Arthur, van Maanen, Jan & Eijkelhof, Harrie (2014). Meaningful statistics in professional practices as a bridge between mathematics and science: an evaluation of a design research project. International Journal of STEM Education, 1 (9) Dierdorp, A., Bakker, A., Eijkelhof, H.M.C. & van Maanen, J.A. (2011). Authentic practices as contexts for learning to draw inferences beyond correlated data. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13, (pp. 132-151 Savelsbergh, E. R., Prins, G. T., Rietbergen, C., Fechner, S., Vaessen, B. E., Draijer, J. M., & Bakker, A. (2016). Effects of Innovative Science and Mathematics Teaching on Student Attitudes and Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Study. Educational Research Review.Open access: 8/25/2016
52