Production of alpha-amylase from Bacillus subtilis using different agro waste (Rice bran) by solid state fermentation

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery ISSN: 2347-9027 International peer reviewed Journal Special Issue Analytical Chemistry Teachers And ...
Author: Miranda Foster
0 downloads 2 Views 437KB Size
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery ISSN: 2347-9027 International peer reviewed Journal Special Issue Analytical Chemistry Teachers And Researchers Association National Convention/Seminar Issue 2, Vol. 1, pp 699-711, 28 February 2016, Available online at http://www.jmcdd.com

Production of alpha-amylase alpha from Bacillus subtilis using different agro waste (Rice bran) by solid state fermentation Asmita. P. Salvi Department of Biotechnology, Milind college of science, Aurangabad (Maharashtra) 431001

Abstract: Enzyme production by Fermentation carried out by solid state fermentation. SSF have been established as a superior technique for the production of enzymes. The project targeted at the production of  amylase by B. subtilis using rice bran as substrate with the use of SSF techniques and tested for its activity. Effect of physical parameters such as enzyme concentration, substrate concentration, temperature and incubation time and PH were also tested. Substrate tested found most suitable for enzyme production & their potential could be effectively exploited in the future for production of various commercial products.

Keywords :- alpha-amylase, amylase, B. subtilis, agro waste, fermentation, rice bran.

Introduction: Life is intricate meshwork involving a perfect coordination of a vast majority of chemicals reactions. Some of these reactions result in synthesizing large molecules, others in cleaving large molecules and all of them either utilize energy oorr liberate energy. All these reaction occurs very slowly at the low temperature and the atmospheric pressure the condition under which living cell carry on their life processes, yet in the living cells these reactions proceeds at extremely high rate. This is due to the presence of some catalysts produced and synthesized inside the body of the organism. Enzymes are biocatalysts protein in nature; they catalyze the biochemical reaction taking place in the living cell without any overall change.

ISSN: 2347-9027

www.jmcdd.com

Page 699

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery ISSN: 2347-9027 International peer reviewed Journal Special Issue Analytical Chemistry Teachers And Researchers Association National Convention/Seminar Issue 2, Vol. 1, pp 699-711, 28 February 2016, Available online at http://www.jmcdd.com

Isolated ted enzymes were first used in detergents in the 1914, their protein nature proven in 1926 and their large scale microbial production stared in 1960s. A large number of industrial processes in the areas of industrial environmental and food technology utilize utili enzymes at some stage or the other. Current developments in biotechnology are yielding new application for enzymes. Now a day, most enzymes are produced in industry for various purposes, lipase, protease, amylase, cellulose and other enzymes are also produced produced in industries. Many organisms are capable to produce various enzymes. Bacteria and fungi are mostly used organism for production of enzymes. The most widely used enzyme in the industry for starch hydrolysis is alpha amylase (EC.3.2.1.1). These enzymes enzymes account 65% of enzyme market in world. wo This enzyme catalyses the endo-cleavage cleavage of the alpha1, 1, 4 glycoside linkages and the release of short oligosaccharide and limit dextrin. This enzyme is used commercially for the production of sugar syrups from starch which consist of glucose, maltose and higher oligosaccharide. It is also extensively used in starch liquefaction and paper, food, pharmaceutical and sugar induction. To meet the demands of these industries low cost medium is required for the production produc of alpha amylase. Microbial alphaamylase A large number of microorganism including Bacteria, Yeast and Fungi produce different groups of enzymes. Selection of a particular strain however, remains a tedious task, especially when commercially compete competent nt enzymes, yield are to be achieved. For example, it has been reported that while a strain of produce 19 types of enzymes. Alpha amylase was being produced by as many as 28 microbial cultures. Amylolytic enzymes too are commonly produced by filamentous fungi and the preferred strains belong to the species of as well as bacteria such as Although commercial production of amylases is carried out using both fungal and bacterial cultures. Bacterial alpha amylase is generally preferred for starch liquefaction du due to it high temperature stability. In order to achieve high temperature stability productivity with less production cost, apparently, genetically modified strain hold the key to enzyme production.

ISSN: 2347-9027

www.jmcdd.com

Page 700

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery ISSN: 2347-9027 International peer reviewed Journal Special Issue Analytical Chemistry Teachers And Researchers Association National Convention/Seminar Issue 2, Vol. 1, pp 699-711, 28 February 2016, Available online at http://www.jmcdd.com

Solid state fermentation for alpha amylase production The cost of enzyme production in submerged fermentation is high which necessitates reduction in production cost by alternative methods. The contents of synthetic media are very expensive and these contents might be replaced with more economically available agricultural byproducts for the reduction of cost of the medium. Agro industrial residues are generally considered the best substrate for the solid state fermentation processes and use of solid state fermentation (SSF) for the production of enzymes is noo exception to that a number of such substrate have been employed for the cultivation of microorganisms to host of enzyme. The substrates that have been used included rice bran. The selection of a substrate for enzyme production in a SSF process depends upon several factors mainly related with cost and availability of the substrate, and thus may involve screening of several agro industrial waste. In a SSF process, the solid substrate not only supplies the nutrients to the microbial culture growing in it bbut ut also serves as anchorage for the cells. The substrates that provide the entire needed nutrient to the microorganism growing in it should be considered as the ideal substrate. However, some of the nutrients may be available in suboptimal concentrations orr even absent in the substrate. In such cases, it would become necessary to supplement them externally with these. It has also been a practice to pretreated, some of the substrate before using in SSF processes, thereby making them more easily accessible for fo microbial growth. Scientific classification of Bacillus subtilis Domain

-

Bacteria

Phylum

-

Firmicutes

Class

-

Bacilli

Order

-

Bacilliales

Family

-

Bacillaceae

Genus

-

Bacillus

Species

-

B.subtilis

Binomial name :

-

ISSN: 2347-9027

Bacillus subtilis www.jmcdd.com

Page 701

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery ISSN: 2347-9027 International peer reviewed Journal Special Issue Analytical Chemistry Teachers And Researchers Association National Convention/Seminar Issue 2, Vol. 1, pp 699-711, 28 February 2016, Available online at http://www.jmcdd.com

Chemical composition of starch :: [1] Molecular formula:- (C6H10O5)n [2] Molar mass:-

Variable

[3] Appearance:-

White powder

[4] Density:-

1.5%/cm3

[5] Melting point:- Decomposes [6] Solubility in :-

ISSN: 2347-9027

Water

www.jmcdd.com

Page 702

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery ISSN: 2347-9027 International peer reviewed Journal Special Issue Analytical Chemistry Teachers And Researchers Association National Convention/Seminar Issue 2, Vol. 1, pp 699-711, 28 February 2016, Available online at http://www.jmcdd.com

Materials and methods: Microbial cultures The respective culture was Bacillus subtilis and maintained on nutrient agar slants at 40C. Materials:1. Nutrient broth 2. Bacillus subtilis Culture Agro waste products for SSF 1. Rice bran 2. Chemicals for confirmations Test for α amylase 1. Biurette Reagent 2. Iodine reagent Chemicals for study of different parameters ( PH,Temperature,Substrate concentration) 1. Freshly prepared 1 % starch solution 2. α- Amylase ( Supernatant) 3. phosphate buffer ( PH 6, 6.5,7.0,7.5,8.0) 4. DNSA reagent Chemicals for Immobilization of αα Amylase 1. sodium Alginate ISSN: 2347-9027

www.jmcdd.com

Page 703

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery ISSN: 2347-9027 International peer reviewed Journal Special Issue Analytical Chemistry Teachers And Researchers Association National Convention/Seminar Issue 2, Vol. 1, pp 699-711, 28 February 2016, Available online at http://www.jmcdd.com

2. 0.05 M CaCl2 Solution 3. 0.02 M CaCl2 Solution 4. α- Amylase (Supernatant)

METHOD: Preparation of pre-inoculums inoculums B. subtilis was grown on nutrient agar slant for 24 hrs; some colonies were transferred with a sterile needle into the flask containing sterile nutrient broth for heavy growth of bacteria for 24 hrs at 370C in incubator. Bioconversion method Bacillus subtilis 5 gm of Rice bran is taken in a flask containing 50 ml of basal medium, sterilized at 15 lbs pressure for 15 min. at 1210C, inoculated with heavy culture of Bacillus subtilis and incubated for 48 hrs at 370C in incubator, centrifuged for 30 min. at 3000 rpm and supernatant was used as a source of enzyme, alpha amylase produced in the sample is estimated by nitrosamine salicylic acid (DNSA) method. Confirmation Test:

Confirmations Test for Iodine & Biurette reagent ISSN: 2347-9027

www.jmcdd.com

Page 704

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery ISSN: 2347-9027 International peer reviewed Journal Special Issue Analytical Chemistry Teachers And Researchers Association National Convention/Seminar Issue 2, Vol. 1, pp 699-711, 28 February 2016, Available online at http://www.jmcdd.com

Effect of different Parameters ( Effect of temperature & PH) Test performed by incubating temperature reaction mixture for 10 min. at temperature ranging from 20-100 oC. effect of PH determined by varying phosphate buffer, PH 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8. Observation Table:Effect of PH

Sr

PH

no

1%

Buff

Enzyme

DNS

Star

er

(ml)

A

ch

(ml

at

540

nm

rice bran

(ml) Boiling

1

6.0

0.4

0.2

2

6.5

0.4

0.2

300C for 30 1

3

7.0

0.4

0.2

min

4

7.5

0.4

0.2

1

0.02

5

8.0

0.4

0.2

1

0.01

Blan

7.0

0.4

0.2

1

1.%

Incubation at

1

O.D

1

0.02

water Bath 10 min

for

0.01 0.05

k

ISSN: 2347-9027

www.jmcdd.com

Page 705

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery ISSN: 2347-9027 International peer reviewed Journal Special Issue Analytical Chemistry Teachers And Researchers Association National Convention/Seminar Issue 2, Vol. 1, pp 699-711, 28 February 2016, Available online at http://www.jmcdd.com

Effect of PH 0.06 0.05

0.05

0.04 0.03

Series 1

0.02

0.02

0.01

0.02 0.01

0.01

0 6 6.5 7 7.5 8

Observation Table:Effect of Temperature Sr

Temp

No (0C)

1%

phosphate buffer

PH

Enzyme

starch(ml)

7 (ml)

(ml)

DNSA

O.D 540nm

1

200C

0.2

0.4

0.2

1

0.02

2

300C

0.2

0.4

0.2

1

0.02

3

400C

0.2

0.4

0.2

1

Incubation 0.06

4

500C

0.2

0.4

0.2

5

600C

0.2

0.4

0.2

6

700C

0.2

0.4

0.2

Incubation 1 Of 1 respective Temperature 1

7

800C

0.2

0.4

0.2

1

0.01

8

900C

0.2

0.4

0.2

1

0.02

9

1000C

0.2

0.4

0.2

1

0.02

10

Blank

0.2

0.4

1

00

ISSN: 2347-9027

www.jmcdd.com

at

0.03

respective

0.02

Tem

0.04

Page 706

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery ISSN: 2347-9027 International peer reviewed Journal Special Issue Analytical Chemistry Teachers And Researchers Association National Convention/Seminar Issue 2, Vol. 1, pp 699-711, 28 February 2016, Available online at http://www.jmcdd.com

Effect of Temperature 0.07

0.06

0.06

0.05

0.04

0.04

0.03

Series 1

0.03

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.01

0.02

0.01

0 20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Effect of Substrate concentration

Substrate concentration altered from 0.1 to 1.0ml followed by phosphate buffer (0.4 ml) and (2 ml) and incubated for 5min in boiling water bath. Then DNSA was added and after incubation for 5min in boiling water bath and estimation spectrophotometrically. Observation Table:

ISSN: 2347-9027

www.jmcdd.com

Page 707

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery ISSN: 2347-9027 International peer reviewed Journal Special Issue Analytical Chemistry Teachers And Researchers Association National Convention/Seminar Issue 2, Vol. 1, pp 699-711, 28 February 2016, Available online at http://www.jmcdd.com

Sr.No 1%

D\W

Substrate Buffer Enzyme

starch

Conn

(ml)

(mg\ml) ml)

DNSA

D\W

O.D

(ml)

1

0.1

0.9

1

0.04

2

0.2

0.8

2

0.04

3

0.3

0.7

3

Kept

Kept

0.05

4

0.4

0.6

4

in

in

0.05

5

0.5

0.5

5

boiling 0.5 ml

boiling

0.06

6

0.6

0.4

6

water

water

3.2

0.05

7

0.7

0.3

7

bath

bath

ml

0.06

8

0.8

0.2

8

for

for

9

0.9

0.1

9

5min

5min

0.2 ml

0.1 ml

0.07 0.07

0

10

1.0

00

10

11

Blank

00

00

ISSN: 2347-9027

at40 C

www.jmcdd.com

0.08

Page 708

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery ISSN: 2347-9027 International peer reviewed Journal Special Issue Analytical Chemistry Teachers And Researchers Association National Convention/Seminar Issue 2, Vol. 1, pp 699-711, 28 February 2016, Available online at http://www.jmcdd.com

Effect of Substrate conc. 0.09 0.08

0.08

0.07

0.07 0.07

0.06

0.06

0.05

0.05 0.05

0.04

0.06 0.05 Series 1

0.04 0.04

0.03 0.02 0.01 0 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Enzyme immobilization

ISSN: 2347-9027

www.jmcdd.com

Page 709

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery ISSN: 2347-9027 International peer reviewed Journal Special Issue Analytical Chemistry Teachers And Researchers Association National Convention/Seminar Issue 2, Vol. 1, pp 699-711, 28 February 2016, Available online at http://www.jmcdd.com

Enzyme immobilization was done by using 6 % sodium alginate & beads wear formed in 0.05 M, 0.02 M CaCl2 solution.

Result & Discussion Basal media for bacillus subtilis was prepared with different agro waste(Rice bran) and production of α- Amylase was confirmed by nitrosamine salicylic acid (DNSA) method. Burette method, iodine test for enzyme obtain from B. Subtilis using rice bran as a substrate & effect of PH, Temperature and Substrate concentration was determine Effect of PH determine by varying phosphate buffer PH between 6--8 from the graph the optimum PH determined was 7 and amylase was obtained on 0.05mg/ml . Enzyme activity estimation by incubating reaction mixture for 10 min at

temperature

ranging from 20-1000C shown highest activity at 400C and amylase was obtained on 0.06mg/ml. The maximum activity attain with Rice bran substrate at its highest concentration.

References: [1]

Anto Hema & Ujjval Trivadi (2006) αα Amylase production by Bacillus cereus, food Technol, Biotechnology 44(2) : 241-245. 241

[2]

Bilal Balkan and Extan Figen (2007). Production of αα Amylase from penicillium chrysogenum under solid state fermentation by using some agriculture agriculture by product, food technology biotechnology 44(4): 439-442. 439

[3]

Jain. J.L , Sanjay Jain (2006) fundamental of Biochemistry, sixth edition 333 333-336.

[4]

Pandey A, P. Selvakumar, C.R Soccol and Poonam Nigam (1992). Solid

State

fermentation for production of industrial i enzyme 27:109 117. [5]

Pandey A, C.R. Soccol (2005). New development in solid sate fermentation, I Bioprocess and product, process biocbem. 35:1153-1169. 35:1153

[6]

A. Pandey, P. Nigam, C.R. Soccol, V.T. Soccol, D. Singh, R. Mohan, Biotechnol. Appl.

ISSN: 2347-9027

www.jmcdd.com

Page 710

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery ISSN: 2347-9027 International peer reviewed Journal Special Issue Analytical Chemistry Teachers And Researchers Association National Convention/Seminar Issue 2, Vol. 1, pp 699-711, 28 February 2016, Available online at http://www.jmcdd.com

[7]

P.V. Aiyer, Afr. J. Biotechnol., Biotechnol. 2005, 4(13), 1525-1529.

[8]

Z. Konsoula, M. Liakopoulou-Kyriakides, Liakopoulou Kyriakides, Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2006, 39(4), 690-696

[9]

I-U. U. Huq, H. Ashraf, J. Iqbal, M.A. Qadeer, Bioresource Technology, Technology 2003, 87(1), 57-61.

[10]

R.C. Ray, S. Kar, S. Nayak, M.R. Swain, Food Biotechnology,, 2008, 22(3), 234 234-246

[11]

S. Negi, R. Banerjee, Food Technol. Biotechnol., Biotechnol 2006, 44(2), 257--261.

[12]

K. Kathiresan and S. Manivannan, Afr. J. Biotechnol., 2006,

ISSN: 2347-9027

www.jmcdd.com

Page 711

Suggest Documents