Presenter Disclosure

07/04/2014 Learning Objectives Contemporary Management of Symptomatic Leiomyomata By the end of this talk, you will be able to:  understand the bu...
Author: Blaise Richard
2 downloads 4 Views 932KB Size
07/04/2014

Learning Objectives Contemporary Management of Symptomatic Leiomyomata

By the end of this talk, you will be able to:

 understand the burden of fibroid disease Yoav Brill MD FRCSC Obstetrician and Gynecologist Toronto East General Hospital

 recognize the associated signs and symptoms  outline current medical and surgical options for treating uterine fibroids

Faculty/Presenter Disclosure

Disclosure of Commercial Support

• Current Management of Symptomatic Uterine Leiomyomas ….Yoav Brill, MD, FRCSC Obstetrician & Gynecologist Toronto East General Hospital

• Grants/Research Support: None • Speakers Bureau/Honoraria: Toronto East General Hospital, Warner Chillcot, Bayer Healthcare • Consulting Fees: None • Other: National Advisory Boards for ACTAVIS and AstraZeneca

• The Drugs & Therapeutics Day program has received financial support from Abbott Laboratories, Bayer Healthcare, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., Pfizer Canada in the form of an educational grant • The speaker has received an honorarium from the Department of Family Practice, Toronto East General Hospital

• Potential for conflict(s) of interest: None to declare

Mitigating Potential Bias Introduction • The Speaker and the Organizing Committee of the Drugs & Therapeutics Update have complete control over the content of this program. There has been NO Influence from the funders on the content.

1

07/04/2014

Impact of Uterine Fibroids on Hysterectomy Rates

Uterine Fibroids Are Common

National hysterectomy rate in Canada: 338 per 100,000 women

Estimated prevalence of clinically relevant fibroids

Estimated cumulative incidence of fibroids

1.0

Black 0.8

White

0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 36

38

40

42

44

46

Prevalence of clinically relevant fibroids

Cumulative incidence of fibroids

1.0

48

140 120

Rural Urban

135

130 108

0.8

100 0.6

Black

80

66

White

0.4

64

60 44

0.2

49

45

48

40 38

40

42

44

46

48

Age (years)

39 28

0.0 36

Age (years)

160

27

20 0 Uterine fibroids

Baird DD, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:100-7

Burden of Uterine Fibroids

Menstrual disorders

Genital prolapse

Gynecologic Endometriosis Other cancers conditions

Source: CIHI 2010 Report. https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/Healthindicators2010_en.pdf‎

Types of Fibroids

 Most common indication for hysterectomy in the world1  Substantial impact on US health care system (est. $2.2 billion annually)2

 $135 million in direct surgical costs in Canada3  Other costs include increased doctor visits, increased absenteeism and decreased productivity

 Many of the costs are borne directly by the patient themselves

1. CIHI 2010 Report. https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/Healthindicators2010_en.pdf‎ 2. Islam S, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98:921-34 3. Data on file

Indman P. http://efibroids.com/category/uterine-fibroids-basic-information/types-of-fibroids

Range of Symptoms Associated with Uterine Fibroids*  Nearly half of women with fibroids have significant and often disabling symptoms.1

 Symptoms can include:

When symptomatic, fibroids can be linked 3 to at least three major problems:

Bleeding complaints

Pregnancy complications

Mass effects related to the size and location of fibroids

Abnormal

or heavy menstrual bleeding1,2

Pain,1,2

pressure,1,2 and urinary symptoms2

Impairment of

These symptoms and consequences 3 have been shown to diminish quality of life

quality of

life (QOL)2

*Not all fibroids are symptomatic

1. Tropeano G, et al. Hum Reprod Update 2008;14:259-74 2. Downes E, et al. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010;152:96-102 3. Viswanathan M, et al. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2007;154:1-122

2

07/04/2014

Medical Management of Uterine Fibroids

Medical Management of Uterine Fibroids

 Therapies are intended to reduce or eliminate uterine fibroid symptoms through one of the following options:  Reduction

of the size of tumours

 Reduction

of the amount of bleeding

 Choice‎of‎therapy‎is‎influenced‎by‎the‎patient’s:  Symptom  Tumour

severity

characteristics (e.g., volume, localization)

 Age  Uterine

preservation wishes

 Fertility

preservation wishes

Miller CE. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16:11-21

Summary of Currently Used Medical Therapies for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids (1)

Approach

Treatment Goal

Advantages

Disadvantages

Potential Issues for Fertility/Future Pregnancy

Oral Regulate and decrease contraceptives1,2 cyclic bleeding *

• Non-surgical • Symptomatic relief of bleeding

•No effect on fibroid size •Breakthrough bleeding and other side effects •Increased risk VTE3

None

Progestin1,2*

Regulate and decrease bleeding

• Non-surgical • Symptomatic relief of bleeding

•No effect on fibroid size •Inconsistent bleeding pattern •Side effects

None

Levonorgestrelreleasing IUD1*

Regulate and decrease • Non-surgical bleeding, may eliminate • Symptomatic periods relief of bleeding

•No effect fibroid size •Spontaneous expulsion of device4 •Efficacy not evaluated on women with submucosal fibroids 5

None

1.ACOG. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:206-18 2.Miller CE. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16:11-21 3.Allan GM, et al. Can Fam Physician 2012;58:1097 4.Zapata LB, et al. Contraception 2010;82:41-55 5.Mirena® Product Monograph. July 2013

*Not indicated for uterine fibroids IUD = Intrauterine device

Summary of Currently Used Medical Therapies for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids (2) Approach

Treatment goal

Advantages

Disadvantages

GnRH agonist +/- add-back1

Pre-operative therapy in premenopausal women to shrink fibroids and/or relieve anemia

Danazol1

Relief of menorrhagia • Non-surgical • Temporary relief and no immediate • Symptomatic relief • Side effects (waterwishes for pregnancy. • May have some retention, weight gain, reduction in fibroid hirsutism) size

Antifibrinolytic With periods, to (tranexamic decrease flow acid)2

GnRH = Gonadotropin-releasing hormone

Potential issues for fertility/future pregnancy

• Non-surgical •Fibroid regrowth on None • Symptomatic relief cessation of bleeding and •Adverse events pressure (menopausal symptoms, symptoms bone loss) • Reduction in fibroid size

• Non-surgical • No reduction in fibroid • Symptomatic relief size of acute bleeding • Limited data in symptomatic uterine fibroids

None

None

1.De Leo, et al. Drug Safety 2002;25:759-79 2.Naoulou B, Tsai MC. ACTA Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012;91:529-37

GnRH Agonists to Treat Uterine Fibroids

GnRH Agonists

 Are typically used in younger women as a pre-operative therapy to reduce uterine fibroid size Continuous administration of GnRH agonist

Initial flare in gonadotropin release

Flare is followed by GnRH receptor down-regulation and desensitization

Down-regulation causes a hypogonadotropic state

 Used in perimenopausal women to reduce uterine fibroid bulk before the onset of menopause, when uterine fibroids normally decline  Effects are not immediate and can be associated with symptom worsening due to the flare effect, which may be blocked with an aromatase inhibitor Reduction in estrogen and progesterone secretion by ovaries within one month

Miller CE. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16:11-21

 Not indicated for the treatment of uterine fibroids (off label)  Use limited to 6 months in young women, due to hypoestrogenic effects, unless used in conjunction with HRT

Miller CE. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16:11-21

3

07/04/2014

GnRH Agonists  Randomized trial: GnRH agonists vs. placebo

 Repeated administration of GnRH agonists suppresses pituitary stimulation of ovarian estrogen production. This leads to a reduction in: – Bleeding2 – Fibroid volume2 – Uterine volume1,2

Change in uterine volume (n = 128)1 38 16

19

5 0 -19

(p < 0.01)

-36

-56

 Fibroids return to pretreatment size 24 weeks after cessation of therapy1,2

(p < 0.001)

-38

-45 12 weeks

24 weeks

12

24

GnRHa

Placebo 1.Friedman AJ, et al. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:720-5 2.Lethaby A, et al. BJOG 2002;109:1097-108

Ulipristal Acetate to Treat Uterine Fibroids  Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulator (SPRMs)  Rapidly reduces heavy bleeding while directly reducing fibroid size1,2

Ulipristal Acetate Clinical Review  Rapidly stopped excessive bleeding (within a week), normalizes menstrual‎bleeding‎in‎90−98%‎of‎patients‎(PBAC‎ 90% of patients have normalized bleeding (PP population)

40%

20%

80

Patients (%)

Primary efficacy end point (non-inferiority) Week 13

100%

ulipristal acetate 5 mg ulipristal acetate 10 mg Leuprolide 3.75 mg

60 40 20 0 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Time (days) 0%

PP = Per protocol

ulipristal acetate 5 mg

ulipristal acetate 10 mg

Leuprolide 3.75 mg

Donnez J, et al. N Engl J Med 2012;366:421-32

7 days

30 days

Donnez J, et al. N Engl J Med 2012;366:421-32

4

07/04/2014

PEARL II: Effect on Fibroid Volume Reduction (Week 13) Median % volume reduction in the largest fibroids

0

ulipristal acetate 5 mg

ulipristal acetate 10 mg

PEARL II: Median % Volume Reduction in 3 Largest Fibroids After End of Treatment Follow-up

Leuprolide 0

Change from baseline at Week 13 (%) (PP population)

-10 -20

EOT 3-mo 6-mo

Follow-up EOT 3-mo 6-mo

Follow-up EOT

3-mo6-mo

-10 -17

-20 -30

-30 -40

-40

-36

-50

-42

-43

-45

-46 -50

-50

-57

-60 n = 45

-53

-60

Subpopulation of subjects in whom no surgery/UAE was performed

No significant difference between GnRH agonist and ulipristal acetate

Donnez J, et al. N Engl J Med 2012;366:421-32

-62

-55

n = 46

-56 n = 44

-70

ulipristal ulipristal Leuprolide acetate 5 mg acetate 10 mg Change from end of treatment (week 13) to 6-month follow-up for ulipristal acetate 5 mg and ulipristal acetate 10 mg vs. leuprolide: p < 0.05 EOT = End of treatment; mo = Months; UAE = Uterine artery embolization

Donnez J, et al. N Engl J Med 2012;366:421-32

Ulipristal Acetate  PEARL III - open label study following 209 women for up to 4 cycles of Ulipristal 10mg daily for 3 months, separated by a full menstrual cycle

 Amenorrhea rates were 79%, 89%, 88%, and 90%  Median fibroids volume changes were 45%, —63%, -

Ulipristal

67%, and - 72%

 Endometrial biopsies revealed benign histology, without hyperplasia

 Conclusion: Repeated use of Ulipristal provides reliable control of effective, progressive shrinkage of fibroids, and appears safe for longer term use

Uterine Fibroid Embolization

Minimally Invasive Non-Surgical Options

5

07/04/2014

Uterine Fibroid Embolization  Clinical Outcomes Cochrane review showed 30 to 46% reduction in volume of largest fibroid, 85% reduction in bleeding1

EMMY trial demonstrated 48.2% reduction in total myoma volume, 60.5% reduction in dominant myoma volume, no differences in bulk or pain related symptoms as compared to hyst.2 10-23% of women undergoing UFE will require some kind of further intervention1,2 1. Gupta et. al. 2006 2. Volkers et. al. 2007

Magnetic Resonance guided Focussed Ultrasound Surgery (MRgFUS)

Uterine Fibroid Embolization  Advantages  Minimally invasive, does not require GA, no need for prolonged hospitalization, works best for vascular lesions  Disadvantages  painful, requires sedation, requires at least overnight admission, need for additional intervention of up to 25%, premature ovarian failure, fertility implications, and increased risk of minor complications  sepsis, hematoma at puncture site, postembolization syndrome  fever, pain, nausea, and fatigue

MRgFUS  Clinical Outcomes  initial studies limited fibroid volume treated as per FDA as safety was main concern

 volume shrinkage rates average 25% 1  Up to 28% of treated patients end up seeking alternative therapy within a year 2

 Mayo Clinic 4 year study of 130 women 3  at 1 year 87.6% reported overall symptom improvement, 12.4% had no improvement 1. Stewart et. al. 2007 2. Fennessy et. al. 2007 3. Gorny et. al. 2011

MRgFUS  Advantages  Outpatient, non-surgical, real time 3D monitoring of thermal effects with MRI, works best with fibrous lesions

Surgical Intervention

 Disadvantages  expensive capital, long treatment times (3 hrs per session), fertility implications, limitations  fibroid size, location, scars, presence of surgical clips, IUDs, etc.  No RCTs so still considered experimental by many

6

07/04/2014

Surgical Options Endometrial Ablation  Myomectomy  Hysteroscopic  Laparoscopic  Abdominal  Hysterectomy  Vaginal  Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy  Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy  Laparoscopic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy  Abdominal

Questions?

7