Pre-Sale Planning for Business Owners; The Benefits of an Integrated Approach A Case Study Example
The sale of a business can be one of the most
Case Study - Meet the E Family
significant events for families of wealth. Often, family
Mr. Entrepreneur (Mr. E) is a co-founder of The
members have devoted substantial time and resources
Widget Corporation, a C corporation, formed 15
to building a successful enterprise. This dedication
years ago with a business partner. A recent company
and sacrifice have made a meaningful difference in
appraisal has valued the company at $100 million.
creating value and it is doubtful they want to sell
Mr. E, who is married with two teenage children,
the business without maximizing this value for the
ages 16 and 18, owns 1,000 shares of the outstanding
benefit of their family.
stock of Widget Corporation. His business partner
While the sale of the business may be viewed as the successful culmination of years of work, it may also cause concern for the owner, who feels there is not enough time to initiate effective wealth transfer planning. In fact, many owners considering a sale don’t even know what kind of planning to consider. All is not lost, however, and GenSpring’s experience has shown that instituting the proper planning process before a sale has a material impact on the after-tax sales proceeds received and provides peace of mind for the owner, who can be assured they are making thoughtful and beneficial decisions for future
owns the remaining 500 shares, which are valued at $50 million, however, Mr. E controls the decision on whether to sell Widget Corporation. Mr. E has been in discussions with a potential acquirer who made a preliminary offer of $150 million for all of the company stock. At this price, Mr. E would receive $100 million for his stock. At a dinner party, a friend of Mr. E’s suggests that if a potential sale is on the near horizon, Mr. E will need to “do some planning” to ensure that the E family will be able to enjoy their windfall in both the short and longer term. The friend put Mr. E in touch with GenSpring Family Offices.
generations.
The GenSpring Approach: A Four Phase Process
The following case study illustrates the value of sound
In our 25 years of experience working with clients
pre-transaction planning prior to the sale of a family
like Mr. E we’ve learned that a coordinated process
business.
around wealth planning for the future is essential
Sustaining Family Wealth
upon their multi-disciplinary backgrounds and prior experiences with similar families to help deliver maximum value for the family. Thoughtful pre-sale planning typically involves the following elements: Taxes, Estate Planning, Philanthropy, Investments,
In
GOVERNANCE
Fi
ESTATE
PHILANTHROPY
INVESTMENTS
GOVERNANCE
FIDUCIARY
ESTATE
Es
Ph
Go
In
Throughout each phase, GenSpring advisors draw
Go
PHILANTHROPY
Fi
TAXES
Ta
Administration. (Figure 2.1)
Ph
Es
INVESTMENTS
TAXES
FIDUCIARY
phases: Discovery, Planning, Implementation and
Ta
Ed EDUCATION EDUCATION
family. Our approach is divided into four distinct
Ed
to yield the best results for the client and his
to the family’s particular situation. In order to best customize planning for each individual family, we typically engage in a comprehensive discovery process to fully understand both the potential transaction at hand and the family’s near and long-term estate planning and financial goals and objectives. During this Discovery phase, we engage Mr. and Mrs. E
Governance, Fiduciary and Education.
in a process that looks beyond the sale to help
GenSpring can help integrate these key elements
them articulate and prioritize their broader financial
and coordinate with Mr. E’s other expert advisors
planning goals and objectives.
(attorney, CPA and the like) to ensure all involved
At the same time, we recommend that Mr. and Mrs.
parties work to help achieve the desired results for
E engage both an attorney and a CPA with strong
the E family.
backgrounds in navigating the intersection of income, gift, estate and generation-skipping tax planning.
Phase 1: Discovery Wealth transfer planning is not one-size-fits-all. To be effective for Mr. and Mrs. E, their children and their future generations, planning must be tailored
In the event the couple does not have attorneys and CPAs who are appropriately qualified to help with this type of planning, GenSpring is able to help select an
GenSpring Family Offices Coordination of Pre-Sale Planning Process
Discovery
• Wealth Priorities • Goals & Objectives • Document Review
Planning
• Capital Sufficiency • Advisor Selection • Assessment & Modeling
Implementation
• Advisor Coordination • Facilitate Planning • Portfolio Construction
Administration
• Wealth Management • Trust & Entity Administration • Family Governance & Education Figure 2.1
2
advisory team that will ensure the family is getting
In order to make well-informed decisions, we establish
the most effective, timely and coordinated advice.
a tax baseline against which alternatives can be
In our case study, the immediacy of the potential
measured. In our case study, if Mr. E has a zero
business sale necessitates that our first priority is
tax basis in his stock and proceeds with the sale
to request any legal documents that might restrict
without any planning, his federal income tax would
the transfer of company stock to third parties (such
be approximately $23,800,000. Upon his death, the
as charities or trusts). Any transfer restrictions
after-tax proceeds received by Mr. E will also be subject
in the company or shareholders’ agreements that
to federal estate tax, approximately $30,480,000.
might jeopardize pre-transaction planning must be
Now that we have helped Mr. and Mrs. E understand
addressed with Mr. E and the company attorneys as
the potential after-tax sale proceeds and future estate
soon as possible.
tax liabilities, we turn our focus to the feasibility
Additionally, we must gather and review all Mr.
of accomplishing the goals and objectives they are
and Mrs. E’s estate planning documents. Our initial
envisioning for the wealth.
review of their current plan will provide important
In order to understand what portion of the sale
context for our discussions that reveal the family’s goals and concerns.
1
2
proceeds Mr. and Mrs. E will need to be able to live the life they are imagining, we determine if they are
The Discovery phase is a critical first step for effective
planning a one-time large purchase (such as a jet
wealth transfer planning. We do not want to get
or a yacht) in the near future. Will they be making
far along in the planning process only to discover a
a large real-estate purchase or upgrading current
problem that could jeopardize the pre-transaction
residences? Will they have other sources of income
planning.
outside of investment income, or will they live on
Phases 2 and 3: Planning & Implementation
investment income alone? What are their day-to-day
The foundation of pre-transaction planning in this context is the transfer of company stock. Through the
living expenses? How much can be set aside to fund these expenses and how much can be set aside for
planning phase important questions like the amount
long-term growth?
and to whom or what entities transfers will be made
The answers to these questions allow us to prepare a
must be explored and resolved.
detailed Capital Sufficiency analysis that shows how
1
$100 million X 23.8%, which represents the long term capital gains rate of 20% + 3.8% for the Medicare surtax put in place by the Affordable Care Act. This assumes the stock is not eligible for any income tax exclusions as Qualified Small Business Stock and puts aside any alternative minimum tax and state income tax considerations.
2
$76,200,000 X 40%, the current highest federal estate tax rate, assuming that Mr. and Mrs. E use their $10.5 million 2013 federal estate tax exclusion to transfer or shelter other assets. For illustration purposes only. Actual results may vary.
3
long their capital will last based on a myriad of tax,
is that the IRS could apply the “assignment of income”
spending and income projections. This analysis gives
doctrine to assert that the entire gain on the sale of
Mr. and Mrs. E confidence that their needs will be met
company stock is recognized by Mr. E, even though
and they can objectively focus on the decisions for
he transferred shares to charity. The greater the
sizing their charitable and family transfers.
certainty of sale and the shorter the time between
After reviewing the Capital Sufficiency analysis, Mr.
the transfer and sale, the higher the risk that the IRS
and Mrs. E feel comfortable in giving away $5 million to charity. During the Discovery process, we learned that Mr. and Mrs. E’s daughters are top-notch athletes who will attend and play softball at their parents’ alma mater. Knowing this, we might recommend a pre-sale
might successfully challenge the transfer and deem all gains taxable to Mr. E. We believe the best defense against this risk is to make sure the transfer occurs well in advance of any contract to sell and the actual sale itself. Increasing the lead time of
charitable contribution of a portion of Mr. E’s company stock (either outright or in trust) that will fulfill the couple’s desire to make a large contribution to build and endow the operation of a new softball stadium at the university. Mr. E would
“By making a charitable contribution of shares that should generate $5 million of proceeds, Mr. E could save approximately $1,190,000 ($5,000,000 x 23.8%) in federal income tax.” 3
any charitable transfer of stock, however, can create another set of problems. What happens if the sale does not occur after the charitable transfer takes place? The company would find themselves with charity
receive a charitable income tax deduction for the value
as a potential long-term shareholder and the charity
of his contribution and, as the Capital Sufficiency
would own an operating business that it likely has
analysis revealed, the transfer could reduce the
no desire to own. Working with legal counsel to give
federal income tax he will incur as a result of the sale.
shareholders a right to sell their interest back to the
By making a charitable contribution of shares that
company or a right of first refusal in the shareholder’s
should generate $5 million of proceeds, Mr. E could
agreement can help mitigate this risk.
save approximately $1,190,000 ($5,000,000 x
The need to transfer company stock to charity sooner
23.8%) in federal income tax.
3
rather than later also may give the donors less lead
The overall planning process involves the discussion
time before the transfer to work with the university to
and careful consideration of different risks. One
design a detailed plan for the building of the stadium.
primary risk of engaging in pre-transaction transfers
The use of a donor-advised fund (DAF), which can
3
Note that the valuation of the stock may be less than the purchase price depending on when the transaction occurs so this tax savings may vary. If the business owner lives in a high income tax state, then the tax savings may be even greater.
4
direct disbursements over time to build and operate
Mrs. E will have access to the trust, whether the trust
the stadium, might present a good solution. Using a
income will be taxed to Mr. E, and how the trust
DAF also affords Mr. and Mrs. E some level of control
should operate if the sale does not occur.
of the sales proceeds if the school chooses to back out
Mr. and Mrs. E should also consider certain estate
of its commitment. The funds cannot be returned to Mr. and Mrs. E but can be used for other charitable purposes. We routinely work with charities that establish these types of funds for our clients.
of their estate. One popular technique is the use of a family limited partnership (FLP) or family limited liability company (FLLC). If correctly structured and
During the discovery process, we also identified Mr.
implemented, an FLP or FLLC can provide both tax
and Mrs. E’s desire to transfer some stock to or for
and non-tax benefits. One possible structure begins
the benefit of their children and future descendants.
with Mr. E contributing company stock to a FLP or
After reviewing the Capital Sufficiency analysis, Mr.
FLLC in exchange for units in the FLP/FLLC and then
and Mrs. E decide that they can afford to transfer $15
transferring the units to a trust for the benefit of the
million by gift.
children and future generations.
The structure of any gift must be carefully considered.
Utilizing an FLP/FLLC can provide the following two
Mr. and Mrs. E are concerned about the impact of
benefits:
such significant wealth on their children, and thus do
1. Centralized management by the general partner or
not want them to receive financial resources outright. Consequently, it is important to discuss with Mr. and Mrs. E the advantages of using a trust as the recipient of the gift. These advantages include: •
Protection of the trust assets from unwise actions of the beneficiaries
• • •
Protection of the trust assets from former spouses
managing member, who may often be Mr. E or other experienced business advisor 2. Asset protection, because limited partner/member rights are restricted under terms of the entity’s operating agreement, providing very limited transferability and little or no access to cash or assets
or other creditors of the beneficiaries
These legal benefits also impact the valuation of the
A structured disposition of trust income and
ownership interests in the FLP/FLLC. Because of the
principal
significant restrictions on the limited partnership
Flexibility to account for changes in circumstances
or member interest, a valuation expert may assign
Additional trust issues to discuss with Mr. and Mrs. E
5
planning techniques that “freeze” or reduce the value
a discount to the value of the FLP/FLLC unit when
include who should serve as trustee, whether a trust
compared to the value of the underlying assets.
protector or other trust advisors should be used, how
For example, assume Mr. E funds an FLLC with stock
long the trust should last, the coordination of the
worth $15 million in exchange for FLLC units. A week
trust with other estate planning documents, whether
later he makes a gift of all of his FLLC units to a trust
for the benefit of his children and their descendants.
approach, but the IRS continues to litigate the issue.
An appraisal of the FLLC units might conclude that
Mr. and Mrs. E might consider using other techniques
they should be discounted by 33% so that the value of
in addition to or in lieu of a FLP or FLLC to hedge
the units gifted is approximately $10 million, which
some of the risk (such as a grantor retained annuity
is just under Mr. and Mrs. E’s combined federal gift
trust or a sale to an intentionally defective grantor
tax exemption, resulting in no gift tax owed. The
trust).
federal transfer tax potentially saved is $1.8
The complexity of the planning discussed above
million ($15 million - $10.5 million) x 40%,
requires the careful coordination of financial, tax
which is the highest federal estate tax rate) . In
and legal considerations. GenSpring advises business
addition, no appreciation in value of the partnership
owners on the type of planning discussed and is
units will be included in Mr. E’s estate and therefore
able to coordinate advice from the business owner’s
4
subject to federal estate tax, which could save millions more in federal estate tax. The transfer also may be designed to eliminate future estate and generation skipping
attorneys, CPA and other
Effective pre-transaction planning is complex and requires the careful coordination of financial, tax and legal considerations.
facets are addressed. Phase 4: Administration After going through an intensive discovery and
transfer taxes.
planning process, many
As with many planning techniques, the FLP or
wealthy families pay the professional fees, place the
FLLC involves risks. A primary risk is that the IRS
documents on a shelf and quickly forget about them.
successfully disregards the valuation discount,
However, proper ongoing administration of the plan
resulting in a taxable gift of $15 million. If the IRS
and consistent follow up on open items are critical to
were to prevail in establishing the $15 million value,
achieve successful results.
Mr. E will pay $1.8 million of federal gift tax (plus
Given the planning put in place in our case study,
interest and penalties) since only $10.5 million of the
ongoing care and attention must be given to:
gift is sheltered from federal gift tax. This risk may be
•
mitigated by the use of a defined value formula clause in which a set amount (usually equal to the remaining federal gift tax exemption) is transferred to the FLP or FLLC with any excess amount as determined by the IRS on audit either passing to charity or back to the donor. In a few cases, courts have approved this 4
6
advisors to make sure all
For illustration purposes only. Actual results may vary.
• • •
Mr. and Mrs. E, who will receive $80 million sales proceeds The FLLC, which will receive $15 million The Trust, which owns an FLLC interest The Donor-Advised Fund, which will receive $5 million
Once the sale of the business has been completed, the
next order of business is to coordinate the payment
Mrs. E that considers financial goals, both short and
of federal and state income taxes with the CPA.
long term, so that they can feel secure that their
Estimated tax payments will need to be adjusted to
needs will be met and their overall planning is fully
prevent penalty payments and the CPA will want to
integrated.
evaluate whether or not to pay the state income tax by year end. With the creation of the FLLC and trust, existing estate planning documents should be reviewed and
Conclusion After working through GenSpring’s Pre-Transaction Planning Process, Mr. and Mrs. E agreed that the sale of the Widget Corporation was in their best interest
updated as needed. Additionally, a valuation expert
and the sale proceeded. They are currently enjoying a
will need to appraise the value of the LLC units
life of travel and following their daughters’ collegiate
transferred by gift to the trust.
successes, both on and off the softball diamond.
Once the DAF receives its $5 million of sale proceeds,
We believe GenSpring’s approach to delivering a
we will assist Mr. and Mrs. E in determining how
timely and thoughtful process to pre-transaction
to structure a gift from the DAF to the university.
planning allows families to unlock additional value
For example, Mr. and Mrs. E may want to require a
in a sales transaction. Our experience over 25 years
matching gift program or additional commitments
has shown that, while every family and transaction
of support from the school as a condition of funding
is unique, they can all benefit from the objectivity,
the project. The GenSpring Discovery and Planning
integration and coordination we deliver throughout
process uniquely positions us to serve Mr. and Mrs.
our four-phase Pre-Transaction Planning Process.
E and the FLLC manager as investment advisor for the liquid sales proceeds. Applying a goals-based approach to portfolio construction, Mr. and Mrs. E’s portfolio may be compartmentalized into multiple sub-allocations designed to solve for their nearterm income and longer-term wealth accumulation objectives. Additionally, the unique requirements and objectives of the family LLP/LLC, Trust and donor advised fund must also be considered in the design and management of those specific portfolios. Through the Planning process, GenSpring also considers tax sensitivity and takes a best-fit approach when deciding which investments to locate across the different family entities and portfolios. Our goal is to create an investment plan for Mr. and
7
Authored by GenSpring Wealth Advisory Center, with contribution from: Tim Tallach, JD, CPA, Head of Wealth Advisory Center; David Neubert, CPA, Partner and Jay Cloud, JD, Family Wealth Advisor
Disclaimers The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this presentation is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor-s specific financial needs, objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The statements herein are based upon the opinions of GenSpring and third party sources. Information obtained from third party resources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.
To know more, please call 866.506.1989 or visit us on the web at www.GenSpring.com
©2015 GenSpring Family Offices, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
rev. 20161122