Piezoelectric MEMS: Materials, Devices, and Applications Professor David Horsley Co-director, Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center (BSAC) Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of California, Davis e-mail:
[email protected] http://mae.engr.ucdavis.edu/~memslab
David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Outline • Piezo-MEMS devices today – companies & foundries in the market today – products on the market today – Comparison of piezo materials: PZT & AlN
• Future piezo-MEMS devices – Piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducers (PMUTs) – Air-coupled devices for ranging & gesture sensing – Fluid-coupled devices for biometrics
2 David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Horsley Group Research Optical MEMS
Gyro & magnetometer
Microactuators
Si fluidics
Ultrasonics
New materials & fabrication Magnetic MEMS
3
Diamond MEMS David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Piezoelectric MEMS Commercialization Status 4 David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Film Bulk Acoustic Resonators (FBAR) LTE Band Duplexer (Avago)
• Avago produces 1 Billion AlN FBAR’s per year. David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
IDT: Timing Oscillators
Images: Harmeet Bhugra, IDT David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
6
Other Commercial Piezo-MEMS Devices Panasonic Gyroscope Microgen Energy Harvester
poLight Varifocal Lens 7 David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
(Yole Developpement, Nov. 2013)
Thin Film PZT – Sensors & Actuators Players roadmap – expected year for market entry
Inertial MEMS
Ultrasound MEMS
IR detectors
Drones
MEMS foundries
Expected year of foundry service readiness for thin film PZT technology
TFP Technology - Gyros
… David Horsley, UC Davis
2013
Timeline
2014
2015 September 2014
2016
2017 Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
2018
David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Piezoelectric Materials Mechanical strain ↔ electrical polarization Piezoelectric coefficients
D = eS + εTE strain
stiffness tensor
e = cd d: [pm/V] e: [C/m2] David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
10 Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Comparing Piezoelectric Materials: Materials for Acoustic Transducers Metric Transmitter Sensitivity Receiver Sensitivity
Property
Units
AlN
PZT
ZnO
e31,f
C m-2
-1.05
-14.9
-1.0
ε33 e31,f / ε33ε0
-
10.5
1020
10.9
GV/m
-11.3
-1.64
-10.3
[S Trolier-McKinstry & P. Muralt, J. Electroceram. 12(7-17), 2004.] David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
11
AlN Deposition: Reactive Sputtering XRD of AlN on Mo
Sputtering Chamber Wafer Plasma
Magnetron S-gun V. Felmetsger, OEM Group
• • • •
Deposition rate > 50 nm/min Low substrate temperature: 400°C Bottom electrode materials: Mo, Pt, Al AlN crystalline structure characterized by XRD Rocking Curve – Typically ~1.5° FWHM for highly c-axis oriented film
David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
12
Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers (PMUTs) 13 David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Ultrasonic MEMS: Current Research Areas • Air-coupled PMUTs – Diameter ~0.5 mm – Operating frequencies: 40 kHz – 800 kHz – Applications: gesture recognition, ranging, autofocus, gas metering
• Fluid-coupled PMUTs – Diameter ~50 microns – Operating frequencies: > 10 MHz – Applications: medical imaging, biometrics (fingerprint sensing)
14 David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Ultrasound Applications • • • • •
Medical imaging Ranging/obstacle avoidance Robotics Non destructive testing Gesture recognition
15 David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Existing Ultrasound Transducers
20 mm
• Advantages: – Large output pressure – Directional, if desired
10 mm maxbotix.com
• Disadvantages: – – – –
Inefficient coupling to air senscomp.com Matching layers required Too big for consumer electronics Dumb sensor. Lots of external electronics required.
5.2 mm
muratamericas.com 16 David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Micromachined Ultrasound Transducers
• • • •
Suspended plate structure Increased coupling due to low acoustic impedance Array fabrication possible Micro-scale features 17
David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Air-Coupled Acoustic Transducers Want: • Large output pressure despite air’s low acoustic impedance
→ Large transducer displacement → Piezoelectric Actuation
Piezoelectric (PMUT)
Capacitive (CMUT)
vs.
Al AlN AlN
Mo
[Shelton et al., 2009 IEEE Ultrasonics Symp.] [Wygant et al., IEEE TUFFC 2009] David Horsley, UC Davis
[Przybyla et al., IEEE Sensors J. 2011]
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
18
Aluminum Nitride (AlN) PMUT Cross Section Al
+
2μm
– 1μm 250μm
AlN Mo AlN
Si
450μm
fo ≈ 200 kHz BW ≈Al10 kHz AlN David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
19
Chip-Scale Arrays Enable 3D Ranging 37-Element Array
• 2D array of transducers: – Output power on-axis: N2 – Number of elements sets beam width • Beam width ~180○/N for linear array
– Individual electrodes enable electrical beam steering – Spacing ~λ/2 = 0.9mm for 180○ beam steering
20 David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Phased Arrays are Directional Narrow beam improves SNR & spatial resolution
2D array
Single element
S. Shelton, A. Guedes, R. Przybyla, R. Krigel, B. Boser, D.A. Horsley, 2012 Solid-State Sensors Actuators & Microsystems Workshop, Hilton Head SC, June 2012. David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
21
Phased Arrays are Directional Narrow beam improves SNR & spatial resolution
Relative Output Pressure (a.u.)
20 Measured Data Linear Fit 15
10
5
0 0
5
10
15
20
Number of Transducers
Output SPL Scales with N
2D array
S. Shelton, A. Guedes, R. Przybyla, R. Krigel, B. Boser, D.A. Horsley, 2012 Solid-State Sensors Actuators & Microsystems Workshop, Hilton Head SC, June 2012. David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
22
Range Measurement – Received Signal
≅ mm
Time
Time of Flight David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Range Resolution
Voltage
Time
David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
0.8
25
0.7
20
0.6
15
0.5
10
0.4
5
0.3
0
For 1 m max range design, @50 cm:
0.2
-5
Z-axis: 0.4 mm rms X-axis: 0.2o rms
0.1
y-angle [deg]
Range [m]
Single Pulse Image
-10
Y-axis: 0.8o rms 0
David Horsley, UC Davis
-40
-30
-20
-10 0 10 x-angle [deg] September 2014
20
30
40
-15
www.chirpmicro.com Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
25
Ultrasonic Fingerprint Sensor • Requires PMUTs similar to medical transducers – Center frequency > 20 MHz – 50 m resolution
• Significant performance advantages over existing fingerprint sensors – Sub-surface dermal imaging. – Wet/dry fingers can be imaged.
26 David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
State of the art: Commercial Ultrasonic Fingerprint Sensor
Pros: Dermal detection Cons: Large system mechanical scanning
Mechanical motion
lens
transducer
Reference: Ultra-scan®, U.S. patent 5224174 27 David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Bulk Piezo Fingerprint Sensors Drawbacks: • Interconnect is challenging • Readout based on resonator Q (no advantage over capacitance) • High manufacturing cost.
Sonavation Inc. 28 David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
72 x 9 PMUT Array
Cross-section of 40 µm PMUT
Y. Lu et al, 2014 Solid State Sensor, Actuator, and Microsystem Workshop. David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
29
Coupling the Array to Skin Hydrophone Fluid PDMS
Polyethylene
250 m
PDMS
Concept
Test Setup
30 David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Mapping the Pressure Field
x/z
40 m Needle Hydrophone
PMUT Array x/y 31 David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Experimental Beamforming: AlN PMUTs 15 elements/ 8 channels, 140 m Pitch
1.65
kPa 70 60
Axial distance (mm)
1.6 50 1.55
100 µm
1.5 1.45 1.4
40
12V input
30
15 elements
20
8 channels
1.35 10 1.3
-200
-100 0 100 Lateral distance (m)
200
140 um pitch 32
David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
System diagram: pulse-echo imaging
PMUT Array
Collaboration w/ Bernhard Boser, UC Berkeley David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
33 Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
1 D ultrasonic imaging 600 Pulse echo Envelope
Pulse echo (mV)
400 200 0 -200
1 cm
-400 -600
4
6
8
10 Time (s)
12
14
16
0.6
3
Axial distance (mm)
2.8
0.5
2.6 0.4
2.4 2.2
0.3
2 1.8
0.2
1.6 1.4
0.1
100 µm scanning step
1.2 -5 David Horsley, UC Davis
-4
-3
-2
-1 0 1 Lateral distance (mm)
2
September 2014
3
4
34
5 Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
2 D Scanning 1
Longitudinal distance (mm)
2 0.8 1 0.6 0 0.4 -1 0.2 -2 -4
-2 0 2 Lateral distance (mm)
4
1 cm
0
X scanning step 150 µm Y scanning step 200 µm 35 David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Summary & Conclusions • Current piezo MEMS devices: – Several piezo-MEMS devices are now in high volume production. – Growing maturity of manufacturing base will enable new devices.
• Future piezo MEMS devices: PMUTs – Today’s ultrasound sensors lack capabilities for consumer electronics applications. – In air: Tiny 0.5 mm PMUTs have up to 1 m range. – In tissue: pulse-echo imaging demonstrated w/ 1.8V supply. – PMUTs are a disruptive technology for gesture sensing and biometrics.
36 David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center
Acknowledgements • Prof. Bernhard Boser’s group (UC Berkeley) – Richard Przybyla, Hao-Yen Tang, Igor Izyumen
• Horsley group (UC Davis) – Stefon Shelton, Yipeng Lu, Ofer Rozen, Andre Guedes, Stephanie Fung
• Sponsors – – – – –
NSF & DARPA Texas Instruments Invensense Capella Microsystems Qualcomm 37
David Horsley, UC Davis
September 2014
Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center