PETROLEUM STORAGE FACILITIES

PETROLEUM STORAGE FACILITIES A REPORT OF THE NATIONAL PETROLEUM COUNCIL 1960 NATIONAL PETROLEUM COUNCIL REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON PETROLEUM STOR...
Author: Garry Moody
5 downloads 1 Views 2MB Size
PETROLEUM STORAGE FACILITIES

A REPORT OF

THE NATIONAL PETROLEUM COUNCIL 1960

NATIONAL PETROLEUM COUNCIL

REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON PETROLEUM STORAGE FACILITIES (1959) MARCH 22, 1960 ROBERT L. MILLIGAN, CHAIRMAN W. W. KEELER, VICE CHAIRMAN W. J. ARNOLD, SECRETARY

NATIONAL PETROLEUM COUNCIL OFFICERS Walter S. Hallanan, Chairman R. G. Follis, Vice Chairman James V. Brown - Secretary - Treasurer HEADQUARTERS 601 Commonwealth Building 1625 K Street, N. W. Washington 6, D. C.

Telephone: EXecutive 3-5167

NATIONAL PETROLEUM COUNCIL COMMITTEE ON PETROLEUM STORAGE FACILITIES (1959) CHAIRMAN: *

VICE-CHAIRMAN:

R. L. Milligan The Pure Oil Company Pure Oil Building Chicago, Illinois W. W. Keeler Military Petroleum Advisory Board c/o Phillips Petroleum Company Bartlesville, Oklahoma

SECRETARY:

STAFF ADVISOR:

W. J. Arnold The Pure Oil Company Pure Oil Building Chicago, Illinois

Vincent M. Brown National Petroleum Council Washington, D. C. MEMBERS

Robert o. Anderson Hondo Oil and Gas Company Roswell, New Mexico

Clyde T. Foster The Standard Oil Company (Ohio) Midland Building Cleveland, Ohio

A. F. Barrett Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Association c/o Mobil Producing Company Billings, Montana

Stark Fox Oil Producers Agency of California Los Angeles, California

L. A. Cranson Honolulu Oil Corporation San Francisco, California

W. J. Goldston Mid-Continent Oil and Gas Assn. Oil and Gas Building Houston, Texas

Max M. Fisher Aurora Gasoline Company Detroit, Michigan

B. A. Hardey The Hardey Company Shreveport, Louisiana *******

*GOVERNMENT CO-CHAIRMAN Robert E. Roehl, Office of Oil and Gas U. S. Department of Interior, Washington, D. C. Note:

Mr. Hans C. Jensen initially served as Government Co-Chairman of the Committee from its establishment on March 18, 1959 to July 2, 1959

Harry B. Hilts c/o Empire State Petroleum Association New York, New York

David Proctor Gulf Oil Corporation Gulf Building Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

G. B. Hunter National Petroleum Association c/o Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation Oil City, Pennsylvania

M. J. Rathbone Standard Oil Company (N.J.) New York, New York

Eugene R. Locke Texas Independent Producers and Royalty Owners Association Austin, Texas

M. H. Robineau The Frontier Refining Company and President, Independent Refiners Association of America Denver, Colorado

H. M. McClure National Stripper Well Association Alma, Michigan

D. T. Staples Tidewater Oil Company Los Angeles, California

John L. Matthewrnan Independent Oil Men's Association of New England, Inc. c/o White Fuel Corporation South Boston, Massachusetts

Everett Wells Ashland Oil & Refining Company Ashland, Kentucky

Miles Mills, Sr. National Oil Jobbers Council c/o Oils Incorporated Des Moines, Iowa Albert L. Nickerson Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc. New York, New York J. R. Parten Woodley Petroleum Company Houston, Texas FrankO. Prior Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Chicago, Illinois

John H. White Port Oil Company Charleston, South Carolina Howard D. White Liquefied Petroleum Gas Assn. Chicago, Illinois

REPORT OF THE TECHNICAL SUBCOMMITTEE TO THE NATIONAL PETROLEUM COUNCIL'S COMMITTEE ON PETROLEUM STORAGE FACILITIES February 24, 1960

I.

Origin and Purpose of Storage Facilities Study

Early last year, the Office of Civil and Defense Mobilization requested assistance from the U. S. Department of the Interior in the development of data necessary to permit evaluation of petroleum storage facilities for post-attack purposes under the National Supply Requirements Analysis Program

for survival items established by that Agency.

The Department of the Interior in passing this request on to the National Petroleum Council expressed the belief that authoritative data on the petroleum storage facilities in the United States could best be furnished by the petroleum industry itself through that organization. Accordingly, on January 21, 1959, the Hon. Elmer F. Bennett, as Acting secretary of the Interior, asked the Council to create a committee to undertake a thorough study to determine the petroleum storage facilities in the United States of, and in excess of 25,000 barrels at anyone location, requesting further that a report be prepared of this storage data with a breakdown of both crude oil and refined products, by States, and by counties within each State .•

A second phase of the Government's request asked that each storage plant site be located specifically with respect to latitude and longitude, for the use of OCDM, but that, while the Council was to obtain this geographical information, it should not make any compilation of such location data. The Agenda Committee of the Council, in its report of January 26, 1959, which was unanimously adopted by the National Petroleum Council at its meeting on January 27, 1959, recommended that a committee be appointed to undertake the study as requested by Mr. Bennett.

Pursuant to this recommendation, Walter S. Hall anan ,

Chairman of the Council, on March 18, 1959, appointed the Committee on Petroleum Storage Facilities (1959), under the Chairmanship of R. L. Milligan, President, Pure Oil Company, to make the study and report back to the Council. At the request of Chairman Milligan, a Technical Subcommittee was appointed on April 14, 1959,to determine the best method of obtaining the data asked for by the Government: to gather and compile such data, and to report back to the Main Committee.

- 2 -

II.

Method Used in Obtaining Storage Facilities Data

The Technical Subcommittee, under the Chairmanship of Fred Van Covern, of the American Petroleum Institute, held its first meeting on April 27-28, 1959, at which time it drew up a questionnaire form and sheet of instructions for distribution to all petroleum companies which it believed would have 25,000 barrels or more of petroleum storage capacity at anyone location.

In order to obtain a comprehensive mailing

list of such companies, each Subcommittee member developed a list of names of those companies that, based upon his knowledge and experience, he believed might own or operate facilities of 25,000 barrels within individual States assigned to him by the Chairman.

In addition, the

Chairman obtained from the Bureau of Mines of the Department of the Interior, a list of all companies which contribute to its regular Monthly Petroleum Statement covering so-called primary inventories, as well as a list of those who report to the Bureau's annual statement on fuel oil distribution, the latter providing the basis of those in the secondary inventory group. This resulted in a comprehensive and carefully compiled mailing list.

The questionnaire forms were mailed out by the Council's staff

on August 17, 1959.

Every company owning or operating a refinery,

terminal, bulk plant, tank farm, or other storage facility at which

- 3 -

is located tankage with a capacity of 25,000 barrels or more, was thus asked to report the precise location of such facility, and to compile such data by county and state indicating the crude oil and product assignments at those points as of March 31, 1959.

In addition, all

pipe line companies received questionnaire forms, and were asked to report all applicable tankage served by them or connected to their lines irrespective of ownership, except that at refineries.

This was done in

an effort to assure that all tankage amounting to 25,000 barrels or more in the aggregate at a single location would be reported.

All companies

were further requested to return their completed forms directly to the National Petroleum Council office by October 19, 1959. The Subcommittee sent out report forms to a total of 1,355 companies, and extended every effort to establish contact with and obtain a completed return from each one.

Follow-up letters were mailed

from the Council office to non-reporting companies on November 3, and December 7, 1959.

Finally in January, 1960, each Subcommittee member

was asked to establish field contact with certain companies

which had

still not replied to the questionnaire. The results of this persistent follow-through were most gratifying.

The Subcommittee is pleased to report that of the 1,355 compa-

nies receiving storage facility questionnaires, responses were filed by 1,246 companies, or 92% of all companies contacted.

- 4 -

Thus 109 of

the companies contacted failed to respond to our request.

In this

connection, it is your Subcommittee's judgement that most of the companies which did not respond have less capacity than 25,000 barrels, and further that the actual capacity reported to the survey constitutes at least 98% of all of the storage capacity in the country that falls within the limits of the definitions used. An analysis of the returns received follows: (A)

Total Number Companies Mailed Ouestionnaires: TOTALS (I) (2)

(B)

122 1,233

1,355

Total Returns Received: (I) (2) (3)

(C)

Pipeline companies All other companies

Returns with applicable data (25,OOO bbls. or over) Returns with no applicable data (less than 25,000 bbls.) Not applicable otherwise*

585 522 139

1,246

Total Companies Not Replying

109

As the completed returns were received, they were individually coded and the data submitted was then compiled by the staff of the National Petroleum Council, and final tables prepared for this report. The Technical Subcommittee met in Washington, D. C., on December 1,

1959, and again on February 24, 1960, at which time it analyzed the information compiled by the Council staff and drew up this report to the Council's Committee on Petroleum Storage Facilities (1959)

*

Companies sold facilities; merged operations with a reporting company 1 out of business, etc. - 5 -

III.

Report on Storage Facilities Data Obtained

As of March 31, 1959, there existed 1,585,948,000 barrels of petroleum storage capacity in the United States at 3,109 installations or locations, as defined earlier.

Of this total capacity 452,710,000

barrels were assigned to crude oil storage, and 1,133,238,000 barrels to storage of refined petroleum products.

The breakdown of this tank-

age by type of product to which it was assigned at the end of the First Quarter, 1959 is as follows: TOTAL STORAGE CAPACITY AT INSTALLATIONS OR LOCATIONS OF 25,000 BARRELS OR MORE, ASSIGNED AS OF 3/31/59 to: (Barrels) Crude Oil Gasoline (Finished) Gasoline (Unfinished) Kerosine Jet Fuel Distillate Fuel Oil Residual Fuel Oil All Other Products

452,710,000 318,368,000 98,161,000 55,844,000 29,169,000 248,946,000 143,302,000 239,448,000

TOTAL U. S. STORAGE CAPACITY OWNED BY REPORTING COMPANIES

1,585,948,000

Exhibit A attached hereto sets forth in detail the total petroleum storage capacities, by type of product to which assigned as of March 31, 1959, for each of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.

- 6 -

In addition, Exhibit A indicates

the total number of installations within each State having an aggregate capacity of at least 25,000 barrels. Responsive to the Department of Interior's request that the Council also compile this data by counties within each State, the figures submitted have been so compiled, with the exception of Alaska, Hawaii, and the District of Columbia, on the attached Tables, numbered A-I to

A~4l.

Only those counties are listed in which petroleum storage

installations having 25,000 barrels or more capacity were reported.

It

will be noted that the number of installations within each county is not specified.

Because in many instances there exists but one such

installation in a county, the Subcommittee directed the Council staff, in order to avoid disclosure of company identity, to confine reporting of the number of installations to the totals for each State. In connection with the data contained in this report, the Subcommittee wishes to emphasize the following facts: 1.

All normal storage capacity such as tanks, earthen, concrete

or quarry existent on March 31, 1959, is included for all sites or locations having an aggregate storage capacity of 25,000 barrels or more. This refers to shell capacity only and does not reflect the amount of crude petroleum or its products contained in these facilities. 2.

Crude oil producers' lease storage was not included.

Liqui-

fied Petroleum Gas and Liquified Refinery Gas underground storage,

- 7 -

having been made available to the Office of Civil and Defense Mobilization through another Council committee report, is not included herein. 3.

Storage capacity reported is that existing at all refineries,

water terminals, bulk terminals, tank farms, pump stations, etc., if it is 25,000 barrels or more in the aggregate.

Refined product storage

data is not limited to so-called primary storage levels.

It includes

any secondary or other capacity that met the size requirement. 4.

The data reported does not include storage facilities owned

by the U. S. Government, but does include facilities owned by private companies and leased to the Government. 5.

The definitions of products used in this survey conform in

every way to those currently in use by the Bureau of Mines. 6.

The figures herewith do not include any capacity privately

owned by the ultimate consumer of the products it contains, such as railroads, steamship lines, utilities, manufacturers, etc. The Subcommittee believes that the storage capacity data obtained through its survey is the most comprehensive compilation made to date and can be assumed to represent the total U. S. petroleum industry storage capacity at all sites having 25,000 barrels or more.

Set forth

on the next page is a tabulation of this capacity arranged according to products assigned together with determinations compiled from the latest previous surveys.

-

8 -

TOTAL STORAGE CAPACITY REPORTED FOR

NPC STORAGE FACILITIES SURVEY 3/31/59 (1000 Bb1s.),

Crude ail Gasoline (Fin.&Unf.) Kerosine Distillate Fuel Oil Residual Fuel Oil Sub-total Jet Fuel All Other Products

452,710 416,529 55,844 248,-946 143,302 1,317,331 29,169 239,448

TOTAL

1,585,948

(a) (b) (c)

LATEST PREVIOUS SURVEY 415,422 373,253 47,755 215,000 119,321 1,170,751

(a) (b) (b) (b) (b)

(c) (c)

NPC 3/31/57 Bureau of Mines 3/31/59 Not previously included in any survey

The total capacity of 1 0 585,948,000 barrels reported in this survey is 415,197,000 barrels more than had been accounted for in previous surveys.

Of this difference 268,617,000 barrels are attribut-

able to the extension of this survey to include "jet fuel" and "all other products" where previous surveys were limited to crude oil and the so-called four major products.

The total capacity for crude oil

and for the major refined products of 1,317,331,000 barrels developed in this survey is 146,580,000 barrels greater than was reported in the previous NPC survey for crude oil on March 31, 1957 and by the Bureau of Mines for products on March 31, 1959.

It should be pointed

out, however, that the new survey covers storage capacity of 25,000 barrels or more and includes both primary and secondary storage, whereas, the Bureau of Mines' survey included only shell capacity of storage -

9 -

tanks at refineries and bulk terminals where terminal size was limited to 50,000 barrels or more.

It should also be noted that this current

NPC survey cannot be directly compared with the NPC surveys of March 31,

1957 and earlier, inasmuch as the prior NPC surveys also covered only primary storage and did not include secondary storage. The storage facilities data obtained in this study was primarily gathered for the use of the Office of Civil and Defense Mobilization in order to enable that organization to evaluate petroleum storage facilities for post-attack purposes.

Inasmuch as OCDM is organized on a

regional field level, the Subcommittee has listed below the total storage capacity, for crude and refined products, located within each of the eight OCDM Regional Districts, with Alaska and Hawaii combined as a separate unit. TOTAL STORAGE CAPACITY ASSIGNED AS OF MARCH 31, 1959 TO CRUDE PETROLEUM AND PRODUCTS (Installations Having Aggregate Capacity of at Least 25,000 barrels) CRUDE OIL

REFINED PRODUCTS

TOTAL ALL OILS

(thousands of barrles)

15,494 1 36,644 2 3,276 3 39,016 4 238,942 5 40,284 6 73,496 7 5,534 8 Alaska & Hawaii 24 TOTAL UNITED STATES 452,710 OCDM OCDM OCDM OCDM OCDM OCDM OCDM OCDM

177,469 153,592 60,312 155,298 282,025 84,133 179,533 37,440 3,436 1,133,238

Region Region Region Region Region Region Region Region

- 10 -

192,963 190,236 63,588 194,314 520,967 124,417 253,029 42,974 3,460 1,585,948

In response to the second phase of its assignment, the request to obtain for the Office of Civil and Defense Mobilization the precise latitude and longitude of each plant site reported, the Subcommittee wishes to report that its questionnaire was so designed as to ascertain this information wherever possible.

In those cases where reporting Com=

panies did not have this information they were as.ked to give a description of their plant site's geographical location in a manner specific enough for a cartographer to reduce it to the desired coordinates.

The Sub-

committee is pleased to report that approximately 85% ·of the returns received contained either the exact latitude and longitude in degrees, minutes, and seconds: or township-section descriptions: landmark and mileage description: waterway mileage marks, etc., from which it is felt that OCDM can readily reduce all plant site data to its own working coordinates.

Such coordinates covering the remaining 15% can readily

be calculated from indicated street addresses, relationships to highway junctions and important landmarks. The Subcommittee wishes to p,oint out that no compilation whatsoever of any data relating to exact geographical location of the reported installations was made.

The original completed questionnaires

have been coded by the NationCil Petroleum Council office, withdthe master code retained at all times in that ·office.

While the Sub-

committee feels that all original data should remain intact in the

- 11 -

files of the National Petroleum Council, the original request asked that the detailed information # obtained in the survey, particularly the precise geographical location data, be made available to OCDM through the Department of the Interior.

It is recommended that the

manner in which this shall be accomplished be arranged between those Government offices and the National Petroleum Council .. In conclusion, the Subcommittee extends its appreciation to each company in the industry which cooperated in this important and comprehensive survey.

Respectfully submitted, Fred Van Covern, Chairman w. J. Arnold, Secretary Henry G. Corey, Jr. N.G. Dumbros C. V. Horky W. F. Kirk Maynard I. Landa H. D. Minnick Harry Moreland H. A. Navis George T. Piercy Technical Subcommittee of the National Petroleum Council's Committee on Petroleum Storage Facilities (1959)

-12 -

TECHNICAL SUBCOMMITTEE TO THE NATIONAL PETROLEUM COUNCIL COMMITTEE ON PETROLEUM STORAGE FACILITIES (1959)

CHAIRMAN:

SECRETARY:

Henry G. Corey, Jr. Continental Oil Company Houston, Texas N. G. Dumbros The Ohio Oil Company Findlay, Ohio C. V. Horky The Pure Oil Company Chicago, Illinois

Fred Van Covern American Petroleum Institute New York, New York W. J. Arnold The Pure Oil Company Pure Oil Building Chicago, Illinois H. D. Minnick Gulf Oil Corporation Gulf Building Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Harry Moreland Great Lakes Pipe Line Company Kansas City, Missouri H. A. Navis Standard Oil Company of California San Francisco, California

w.

F. Kirk General Petroleum Corporation Los Angeles, California

Maynard I. Landa Cities Service Company, Inc. New York, New York

George T. Piercy Standard Oil Company (N.J.) New York, New York

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Washington 25, D. C.

C

o P Y

January 21, 1959 Dear Mr. Hallanan: The Office of Civil and Defense Mobilization has asked the Department of the Interior for assistance in the development of data necessary to permit evaluation of petroleum storage facilities for post-attack purposes under the National Supply-Requirements Analysis program for survival items established by that Agency. We believe that authoritative data on the petroleum storage facilities i.n the United States can best be furnished by the petroleum industry through the National Petroleum Council. Therefore, I request that the National Petroleum Council create a committee or committees to undertake a thorough study to determine the petroleum storage facilities in the United States of, and in excess of 25,000 barrels at anyone location, showing the amount of storage by grade. It is further requested that the Council submit a report on its study, and in.clude therein these data with a breakdown of both crude oil and refined products, by States, and by counties within each State. Comments and recommendations which the Council deems appropriate will be helpful. It will be necessary that OCDM have each plant site located specifically with respect to latitude and longitude. While individual locations would have no particular significance from the point of view of national security, any compilation of this data would become classified materi.al. It is sugg'ested therefore that the owner or operator of each plant site prepare two reports, one showing the location by latitude and longitude and the other omitting this information. The first report would be forwarded directly by the owner or operator to the Director, Office of Oil and Gas, Department of the Interior, while the second would be used by the Council for i.ts report. Because of the importance of this information in current defense mobilization planning and Operat.ion Alert exercises, prompt study and an early report would be of great value to Government and will be appreciated. Sincerely yours, /S/ Mr. Walter S. Hallanan Chairman, National Petroleum Council 1625 K Street, N. W. Washington 6, D. C.

Elmer F. Bennett

Acting Secretary of the Interior

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Washington 25, D. C.

C

o P Y

January 26, 1959

Dear Mr. Hallanan: With reference to Acting Secretary Bennett's letter to you dated January 21, 1959 requesting the Council to undertake a study to determine petroleum storage facilities in the United States, it will be satisfactory if the Council obtains only one report for each plant site instead of two as suggested in the letter, provided, the Council does not make any compilation of any of the data relating to the latitude and longitude of the plant sites. As soon as the responses have served the purpose of the Council, they should be made available to the Director of the Office of Oil and Gas for compilation of locations by latitude and longitude. To eliminate any possible misunderstanding concerning the nature of the request, it should be noted that it is limited to storage facilities alone and does not contemplate any inventories in those facilities as of the date of the report. Latitude and longitude should be shown in degrees, minutes and seconds. Sincerely,

/S/ R. S. Fowler Acting Director Office of Oil and Gas Mr. Walter S. Hallanan Chairman, National Petroleum Council 1625 K Street1 N. W. Washington 6, D. C.

.---------

EXHIBIT

A

TOTAL UNITED STATES STORAGE CAPACITY ASSIGNED (AS OF MARCH 31, 1959) TO CRUDE OIL AND ITS PRODUCTS AT INSTALLATIONS OR LOCATIONS HAVING AN AGGREGATE OF 25,000 BARRELS OR MORE CAPACITY REPORT OF NATIONAL PETROLEUM COUNCIL'S COMMITTEE ON PETROLEUM STORAGE FACILITIES (1959)

NUMBER OF INSTALLATIONS (25,000 bbls. or MORE CAPACITY)

CRUDE OIL

GASOLINE (FINISHED)

GASOLINE (UNFINISHED)

KEROSINE

JET FUEL

DISTILLATE FUEL OIL

RESIDUAL FUEL OIL

ALL OTHER PRODUCTS

TOTAL ALL OILS

101 122

1,005 57 13 1,371 40,665 534 443 1,507 778 1, 193 114

(All Capacities Stated in Thousands of Barrels (42 U.S. Gallons) Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming District of Columbia TOTAL UNITED STATES

Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands

29 19 13 37 285 21 47 12 65 28 10 8 107 67 23 72 47 142 35 26 41 89 36 20 44 29 24 2 5

73 30 233 26 7

129 133 26 154 22 13

772 24 55 2,417 71,926 2,016 1,839 156

24,657 7,042 12,511 2,485 24,164 2,783 1,425 1,057 2,352 1,511 1,591 6,635 2,568 1,270 30 9,752 3,473 1,239 658 13,621 40,485 294 14,979 633 324

4

30 596 14

433 168,403 1,515

9

31 46 35 54 56

1,160 2,672 1,135 3,454 17,194

3,092 561 1,085 4,600 26,332 1,413 2,051 2,683 8,625 4,722 901 625 18,057 14,445 4,535 7,136 2,856 12,924 2,015 3,876 3,214 8,922 6,073 1,148 9,443 2,015 1,251 285 189 12,805 809 12,849 4,459 1,165 16,360 9,096 2,543 16,449 1,951 2,689 706 3,169 55,255 l r 954 580 4,925 6,343 1,532 5,420 2,075

3

37 845 20,730 466 36 294 135 10 10 40 7,238 3,830 4,084 419 8,857 137 465 861 220 4,987 1,325 64

5,916 181 1,237 1,088 2,323 3,696 57 5,572 34 100 17,698 498 593 1,787 41 232 2,015

160

5

130

1,005 696 161 2,304 17,877 546 6,845 2,343 2,256 1,840 334 .533 11,768 10,024 3,824 5,115 1,341 7,888 3,097 7,406 7,056 8,732 4,539 233 1,302 1,933 1,596 132 576 25,433 260 21,945 3,093 976 7,368 6,943 2,040 15,554 4,275 1,601 636 1,163 24,461 1,029 959 3,369 6,001 453 6,416 1,431

34

5

238

170

3

610

397 22 2 732 1,112 58 1,065 207 1,472 1,346 61 2,093 1,699 305 529 705 3,322 1,532 675 1,612 1,472 401 123 5,163 24 136 71 2,478 65 3,572 3,467 266 2,565 676 65 3,004 1,075 1,131 20 654 6,754 46 260 1,727 206 92 989 362

347 34 772 465 4,203 40 95 162 1,794 860 126 1,243 673 III

950 234 1,752 755 77 333 232 134 140 319 487 91 103 1,052 247 1,089 11 799 1,410 303 363 95 41 105 5,667 243 353 678 46

2,451 868 191

13,271 10,446 42 6,855 1,793 16,678 113 3,340 1,115 1,783 551 19 1,799 853 128

342 10,506 130 5,363 607 60 1,681 1,417 1,457 5,753 1,312 1,237

20,804 638 2,706 359 225 7,882 12,040 1,414 15,687 976 497

56 13,364 1,840 45 2,486 2,677 216 1,020 628

475 56,312 1,284 4 2,047 3,208 445 607 5,369

6,719 1,519 2,125 13,109 241,987 5,351 12,130 9,335 17,386 10,571 1,941 1,324 82,828 52,127 8,817 38,161 10,219 78,378 10,632 19,492 17,979 26,660 14,561 3,248 31,920 9,905 5,123 508 1,311 88,746 5,803 50,000 11,996 4,438 52,599 75,763 8,173 77,361 10,317 7.513 1,403 6,155 347,914 8,409 1,848 16,660 23,572 3,960 18,138 29,204

375 59,142 278 1,595 300 2,170 600 521 4,501 3,968 981 386 2,793 1,092 1,878 3,383 2,205 1,034

3,109

452,710

318,368

98,161

55,844

29,169

248,946

143,302

239,448

1,585,948

4

1,343

720

428

117

136

431

820

489

4 484

TOTAL STORAGE CAPACITY ASSIGNED (AS OF MARCH 31, 1959) TO CRUDE OIL AND ITS PRODUCTS AT INSTALLATIONS OR LOCATIONS HAVING AN AGGREGATE OF 25,000 BARRELS OR MORE CAPACITY

STATE OF ALABAMA 29

TOTAL NUMBER OF INSTALLATIONS:

COUNTY: *

GASOLINE (FINISHED)

CRUDE OIL

GASOLINE (UNFINISHED)

KEROSINE

JET FUEL

DISTILLATE FUEL OIL

RESIDUAL FUEL OIL

ALL OTHER PRODUCTS

TOTAL ALL OILS

(All Figures Stated in Thousands of Barrels (42 U.S. Gallons) Calhoun Choctaw Colbert Hale Jefferson Marshall Mobile Montgomery Shelby Tuscaloosa Walker ALABAMA TOTAL

181

8

108 60 1.164 32 971 289 228

16 6 184

74

780

11

-.!.L

45 50

199 75 150 295 1.795 38 3,146 364 335 92 230

-1.Q.!.....

1.005

6,719

ALL OTHER PRODUCTS

TOTAL ALL OILS

1,114 55 816 140

10

75

-.2.L

59

106 32 37 2 _ _6_

....J..1L

3.092

.22L..

616

25

---lL

16 9 327 6 484 43 70 9 31

-l1L

1.005

220

115

10 120

STATE OF ARIZONA TOTAL NUMBER OF INSTALLATIONS:

COUNTY: *

CRUDE OIL

GASOLINE (FINISHED)

GASOLINE (UNFINISHED)

KEROSINE

JET FUEL

13

DISTILLATE FUEL OIL

RESIDUAL FUEL OIL

(All Figures Stated in Thousands of Barrels (42 U.S. Gallons) Maricopa Mohave Pima Yuma ARIZONA TOTAL

717

1

281

107

8

351

54

5

..l&L

-.!L

55 368

37

1

.-.ML .....2..L

1,085

_2_

--l.L

....J..1L

*Only those Counties are listed in which 25.000 bbls. or more storage capacity sites were reported. Report of National Petroleum Council's Committee on Petroleum Storage Facilities (1959) Dated March 22. 1960

A-I

2.125

TOTAL STORAGE CAPACITY ASSIGNED (AS OF MARCH 31, 1959) TO CRUDE OIL AND ITS PRODUCTS AT INSTALLATIONS OR LOCATIONS HAVING AN AGGREGATE OF 25, 000 BARRELS OR MORE CAPACITY

STATE OF ARKANSAS

TOTAL NUMBER OF INSTALLATIONS:

COUNTY: *

CRUDE OIL

GASOLINE (FINISHED)

GASOLINE (UNFINISHED)

KEROSINE

JET FUEL

-ll..DISTILLATE FUEL OIL

RESIDUAL FUEL OIL

ALL OTHER PRODUCTS

TOTAL ALL OILS

(All Figures Stated in Thousands of Barrels (42 U.S. Gallons) Chicot Columbia Crittenden Desha Faulkner Nevada Ouachita Phillips Pulaski Sebastian Union White ARI

Suggest Documents