Patient Pathways: Respiratory Medicine

Patient Pathways: Respiratory Medicine Evidence Table: Sleep Apnoea & Snoring Author Year Study type Population Summary of Paper Comments SIGN...
Author: Edwina Hancock
1 downloads 0 Views 5MB Size
Patient Pathways:

Respiratory Medicine

Evidence Table: Sleep Apnoea & Snoring Author

Year

Study type

Population

Summary of Paper

Comments

SIGN

2003

Evidence based Clinical Guideline

UK

Development group members and reviewers listed Methodology detailed. Appendix 1 – Quick reference guide

Evidence Based Healthcare Guideline

USA

Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea/Hypopnoea Syndrome in Adults Covers: definition & clinical background ; diagnosis inc. diagnostic tools ; treatment ; referral ; effects of treatment on quality of life ; information for discussion with patients and carers ; resource implications of recommendations. Diagnosis and Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea

Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement

2004

Adults

Adults

See Appendix 2a for diagnostic algorithm Appendix 2b: treatment algorithm. Appendix 2c: signs and symptoms and recommendations.

Expert group selected by the Section on Paediatric Pulmonology of the American Academy of Paediatrics.

2002

Laitinen – (Expert group appointed by the Finnish Lung Health Association

2003

Systematic Review 1966-1999 278 articles identified

Review and Expert Opinion

Children with uncomplicated Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrome (OSAS) - USA

Adults with sleep apnoea – Finland

Framework for diagnostic decision making. Includes definition of OSAS in children and risk factors; prevalence and progression of condition, diagnosis, treatment options and follow-up. Excludes: infantsor = to 5 apnoeas or hypopnoeas per hours’ sleep + 2 or more symptoms listed in Appendix 7a Appendix 7b – mild OSA and moderate to severe OSA symptoms listed

Reducing waiting times for sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome(SAHS) and snoring using a questionnaire and home oximetry: results of a 2nd audit cycle. Patients with suspected SAHS often referred to a variety of specialists. 1st audit of patient journey – identified lengthy delays – therefore an algorithm was formulated for management of respiratory sleep disorders and re-audited. Audit tools: questionnaire (to assess the risk – high moderate and low – therefore providing basis for further management) , Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and BMI. Results: new management strategy/algorithm - reduced average wait for sleep study by 90 days by prioritising patients. Reduced wait for nCPAP trial by 32 days. >50% reduction in ENT clinic visits.

References listed. It was noted there was a small increase in number of sleep studies performed and no increase in respiratory clinic workload. In 80% of patients, the only investigations required to make a diagnosis are the questionnaire used and overnight oximetry. Copy of the algorithm requested from authors as not included in paper – Appendix 8

Sparks

2002

Case Review

100 patients attending GP over 12 month period New Zealand

Assessment of snorers in primary care: straight path to treatment. Model for primary care management – based on sleepiness and nocturnal hypoxaemia. Problem: whether to refer patient suffering from disruptive snoring to a specialist (& how to decide which specialist) or to advise conservative treatment. Alternative investigations for primary care management • Partner reporting of snoring. • Excessive daytime sleepiness ( measured by Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)). • Nocturnal hypoxaemia – measured by oxygen desaturation index (ODI). Combining both ESS and ODI will provide a system for grouping and subsequent management of potential OSA.

References listed. Model does not purport to diagnose patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) specifically. Requires pulse oximetry

Appendix 1

Appendix 1 continued

Appendix 1 continued

Appendix 2a

Appendix 2b

Appendix 2c

Appendix 2d

Appendix 3a

Appendix 3b

Appendix 3b continued

Appendix 4a

Appendix 4b Checklist for GP when referring for sleep evaluation

Appendix 4c When should other specialists be consulted

Appendix 4d

Appendix 5a

Appendix 5b

Appendix 5c

Appendix 5d

Appendix 6

Appendix 7a

Appendix 7b

Appendix 8

Suggest Documents