Table of Contents PART ONE – OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................... 3 CHAIRMAN’S LETTER ....................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 5 PART TWO – DURBAN REPORT ............................................................................................ 11 1.

THEME 1 – GAMES VISION, CONCEPT AND LEGACY ........................................ 12

2.

THEME 2 – PUBLIC AUTHORITY SUPPORT AND GAMES GOVERNANCE......... 15

3.

THEME 3 – SUSTAINABILITY, ENVIRONMENT AND METEOROLOGY ............... 19

4.

THEME 4 – FINANCE AND MARKETING ............................................................... 21

5.

THEME 5 – SPORT ................................................................................................. 24

6.

THEME 6 - VENUES ............................................................................................... 26

7.

THEME 7 – COMMONWEALTH GAMES VILLAGE ................................................ 30

8.

THEME 8 – MEDICAL AND DOPING CONTROL .................................................... 33

9.

THEME 9 – SAFETY AND SECURITY .................................................................... 35

10.

THEME 10 - ACCOMMODATION............................................................................ 38

11.

THEME 11 - TRANSPORT ...................................................................................... 40

12.

THEME 12 – TECHNOLOGY .................................................................................. 44

PART THREE – APPENDICES ................................................................................................ 46 APPENDIX A – EVALUATION COMMISSION TERMS OF REFERENCE ........................ 47 APPENDIX B – MAP A (DURBAN CONCEPT MAP)......................................................... 48 APPENDIX C - EXTRACT FROM CGF STRATEGIC PLAN 2015-2022 ............................ 50 APPENDIX D – RISK ASSESSMENT ............................................................................... 51 APPENDIX E – GUARANTEE SUMMARY ........................................................................ 52

© Commonwealth Games Federation

August 2015

Page 2 of 54

PART ONE – OVERVIEW

© Commonwealth Games Federation

August 2015

Page 3 of 54

CHAIRMAN’S LETTER Open letter to the CGF Executive Board and Commonwealth Games Associations Dear colleagues and friends, I have pleasure in presenting to the Executive Board and members of the Commonwealth Games Federation the report of the Evaluation Commission in respect of the proposal by Durban 2022 to host the 2022 Commonwealth Games. You would be aware that Commonwealth Games Canada (CGC) had originally endorsed the city of Edmonton in their candidacy for the 2022 Commonwealth Games. It was with regret that we received advice from CGC in February of this year that their bid would be withdrawn for reasons that are well understood by members. We are confident, however, that a future bid from Edmonton is likely, and I thank the CGC for their candour and transparency. In any case, this withdrawal presented an opportunity for the CGF to work intensively with the city of Durban as the sole remaining bidding city. Importantly, the Evaluation Commission was diligent in honouring the evaluation mandate and has undertaken an independent evaluation of Durban’s proposals. In addition the Commission, CGF staff and the Commission’s technical advisors have worked collaboratively with the Durban team in a spirit of partnership, an opportunity which otherwise would not have been possible in a competitive bidding environment. The format for the review of the Durban proposal by the Evaluation Commission built on the successful model developed during the selection of the 2014 Commonwealth Games host and refined during the 2018 Commonwealth Games bidding process. The review involved a combination of independent analysis by technical experts, on-site meetings and inspection visits. The report findings have been discussed extensively with the Durban team. This report is intended to inform members of the CGF of the merits and risks in relation to the Durban proposal. It is expected that members will also take other factors into account in coming to a final decision regarding the 2022 Host City. The Durban Bid Committee will have the opportunity to further clarify any matters in their update to CGF members, should they choose to issue one. While there are many unresolved matters for any bidding city developing a Games proposition seven years in advance of the Games, ten key issues are highlighted that the Commission considers warrant the immediate attention of the Durban Bid Committee. I therefore draw your attention to the summary of substantive issues requiring further attention included in the introductory section of this report. Ultimately the Commission recommends that any decision to appoint Durban as host of the 2022 Commonwealth Games be contingent upon the timely and satisfactory resolution of these important matters. May I thank my CGF colleagues, on behalf of my fellow Evaluation Commission members, for entrusting this important task to us. I also thank each of the members of the Evaluation Commission for their insightful contributions, as well as the many advisors whose specialist knowledge was invaluable. I commend this report to you and recommend that all members undertake a thorough review of its contents prior to the General Assembly in September. I also take this opportunity to extend my gratitude to the Candidate City of Durban for its enthusiastic participation in the collaborative review process. I, along with my fellow Evaluation Commission members, am confident that the foundation has been laid for a productive and effective relationship between our organisations. Yours sincerely

Louise Martin CBE

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 4 of 54

INTRODUCTION Overview This report summarises the findings of the Commonwealth Games Federation (CGF) Evaluation Commission appointed by the CGF Executive Board in relation to the selection of the host for the 2022 Commonwealth Games. The role of the Evaluation Commission, as prescribed by the CGF Constitution, is to: 

Review the progress of construction of Commonwealth Games facilities



Review the ability and/or capacity of the Candidate City and Candidate CGA to comply with the representations made in their Candidature Files



Provide any information that the CGF Evaluation Commission believes will assist CGAs in their deliberations regarding the Candidate Cities.

The CGF Executive Board defined terms of reference for the Evaluation Commission to support the broad objectives as outlined in the Constitution in respect of their review of bids for the 2022 Commonwealth Games. The terms of reference are enclosed at Appendix A. On 9 October 2014 the CGF Executive Board appointed the following members of the Evaluation Commission: 

Louise Martin – CGF Honorary Secretary



Maxwell de Silva – Secretary General, Sri Lankan Commonwealth Games Association



Ian Hooper – Director of Sport and Infrastructure, Glasgow Life



Andrew Ryan – Executive Director, ASOIF



David Grevemberg – Chief Executive, CGF

In addition to the Evaluation Commission members, a range of technical advisors and CGF staff supported the Evaluation Commission. All members of the Evaluation Commission and all technical advisors were free of any interests or conflicts which could influence the impartiality of the determinations of the Evaluation Commission. The views expressed in this report are entirely of an independent nature and results from detailed analysis of information provided by the cities and further independent analysis undertaken by the Evaluation Commission and its advisors.

The 2022 Candidate process The details of submissions required by Candidate Cities was described in a comprehensive Candidate City Manual issued to all Commonwealth Games Associations on 13 December 2013. The Candidate City Manual also described the rules and procedures applicable to Candidate Cities and their Commonwealth Games Associations and provided detailed specifications for the information to be submitted. Additionally the 2022 Candidate process included a comprehensive range of support for bid cities. This included: 

Conducting a Candidate City briefing in London on 30 April 2014



Providing access to the Commonwealth Games online Knowledge Centre

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 5 of 54



Conducting the Observers Programme in conjunction with the 2014 Commonwealth Games in July/August 2014



Conducting a Glasgow 2014 Debriefing and Candidate City Seminar in Gold Coast, Australia in October 2014



On-site visits by the Evaluation Commission



Technical reviews and discussions

2022 Candidate Cities Two Commonwealth Games Associations endorsed cities to submit their candidacy to the CGF for the 2022 Commonwealth Games. These included Canada (with the City of Edmonton) and South Africa (with the City of Durban). Regrettably the CGF received notification from the CGA of Canada on 10 February 2015 that it had decided to withdraw from the 2022 due to the financial ramifications of the global fall in oil prices.

The Evaluation Commission programme In accordance with the guidelines established by the CGF Constitution, the terms of reference set by the CGF Executive Board and the procedures outlined in the Candidate City Manual the Evaluation Commission undertook a detailed review of the proposal submitted by Durban 2022 on 2 March 2015. An early consideration for the Evaluation Commission was the implication of having a single Candidate City and the need to assure Commonwealth Games Associations that the propositions from the city were feasible and appropriate for the 2022 Commonwealth Games. To achieve a higher level of certainty and to assist Durban 2022 to provide a more mature set of plans, the Evaluation Commission worked directly with the Durban 2022 Bid Committee and its government and city authorities to undertake a detailed review of all aspects of their proposed plan. As a consequence the Evaluation Commission sought further detailed submissions from Durban 2022. These were received on 26 April during the Evaluation Commission visit and subsequently final clarifications were received on 30 June 2015. The Evaluation Commission adapted its on-site evaluation visit to include detailed evaluation reviews and technical workshops, enabling a more thorough examination of the various aspects of Durban’s Games concept. This resulted in an intensive interaction and culminated in a final review workshop conducted on-site in Durban. Following are the key dates related to the preparation of the Evaluation Commission report: CGF received Candidature File

2 March 2015

Preliminary assessment of compliance of Candidature File

2-4 March 2015

Initial desktop review of Candidature File

4-12 March 2015

Issues list and clarifications prepared and provided to Evaluation Commission members

12 March – 22 April 2015

Evaluation Commission pre-site visit briefing – Durban

26 April 2015

Site visit – Durban

27-30 April 2015

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 6 of 54

Clarifications received from Durban

30 June 2015

Final review workshop - Durban

13-16 July 2015

Compilation of Evaluation Commission Report

1-24 July 2015

Report published

31 July 2015

Summary of findings Project overview Durban 2022 presents an attractive proposition for the Commonwealth Games in a beachside city featuring an attractive coastal strip and long-term development plans that the Commonwealth Games can actively reinforce. Importantly, Durban presents the opportunity for the Commonwealth Games to be hosted in the continent of Africa for the first time. The Games concept benefits from a compact footprint, a relatively modest capital works programme and a benign transport environment with adequate existing transport infrastructure that should accommodate the Games load. The opportunity exists to present the Games to the local community, spectators and international broadcast audiences in a manner which is consistent with the CGF strategy and which will enhance the position of the Commonwealth Games globally. The project enjoys strong engagement from and the support of the three levels of government (city, province and national) and has been led by the South African Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee (SASCOC), which is also the CGA. One of the most powerful propositions presented in the Durban 2022 bid is the opportunity for a far-reaching legacy aligned with existing long term development plans of the South African Government and the City of Durban. Project delivery Against this positive backdrop and consistent with its long term strategy, the CGF should provide more direct and active support for Durban 2022, while respecting the local capabilities, to generate greater efficiencies and to minimise delivery risks. Through the initial working process of the Evaluation Commission, the CGF has established the foundations of an effective cooperative partnership with Durban 2022. This will need to be more fully defined during the balance of 2015, with the ultimate objective of having the CGF play an active role to support Durban 2022 to optimise both the Games and legacy delivery. In shaping this recommendation the Commission reflected on the Commonwealth Games Strategic Plan 2015-2022 (Transformation 2022) and in particular the following action in relation to Strategic Priority One – Innovative Games: By Q2 2016, and enshrined in the 2022 Host City Contact, establish a Games Delivery Partnership model that positions the CGF and Host CGAs as delivery partners and supports financial, operational and reputational efficiencies and outcomes. Bid compliance The CGF requires Candidate Cities to submit a range of guarantees and undertakings, and to support these with initial plans that demonstrate the city’s ability to meet the guarantee conditions. © Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 7 of 54

Durban 2022 has submitted a range of compliant guarantees; however, further development is required in accordance with the summary in each theme analysis and as consolidated in Appendix C. The appointment of Durban as host will require the assurance that the balance of conditions outlined in guarantees, not yet provided in a compliant form, will nevertheless be met. Substantive issues requiring further attention Given that the review was limited to a single Bid City, the Evaluation Commission adopted a primarily risk-based approach to the review. The discussions with the Durban 2022 team therefore focused most particularly on those items that, in the opinion of the Evaluation Commission, presented the greatest risk to the staging of the Games (whether in respect of potential financial ramifications, reputational risk or general risk to the success of the Games). Within the body of this report, a range of issues which require further near-term attention have been documented. The Evaluation Commission notes that as there are more than seven years to the Games, there are many issues which are yet to be resolved and there is time to do so through effective planning. However, in the opinion of the Evaluation Commission and on the basis of its risk-based assessment, the ten matters listed below require immediate attention, should Durban be appointed as Host City, within 90-180 days of any such appointment. Finance 1. The guarantee covering a potential financial shortfall was not received at the time the Report was finalised, but is expected to be submitted before the General Assembly. This is a critical requirement. The Bid Committee is continuing to work across the three levels of government to secure the guarantee and has advised that the requirement will be achieved. The Ministerial support enjoyed by the bid is also noted. However, should this guarantee not be received prior to the CGF General Assembly, it is recommended the signing of the Host City Contract be deferred until the Guarantee is provided. Proposed deadline for resolution: within 90 days of the General Assembly Games governance 2. The critical coordination role anticipated for the proposed (but not currently constituted) Inter-Ministerial Committee needs to be enabled by an effective cross-government delivery coordination entity, with a focus on integration of government and city support for the Games and the assurance of legacy programmes. This should be supported by a clearlydefined set of roles and responsibilities for the various government departments, public authorities and other entities that will have a role in the planning and delivery of the Games. Proposed deadline for resolution: within 180 days of appointment as Host City 3. The constitution of the Organising Committee, including Board membership and coordination links with government, needs to be clearly articulated at a conceptual and strategic level to ensure clarity of responsibility and control. Proposed deadline for resolution: within 180 days of appointment as Host City

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 8 of 54

Games venues 4. Clarification is required regarding the integrated development and financing arrangements to ensure delivery of all venues. While there are individual plans for some venues, an overall integrated venue delivery strategy that optimises efficiencies across projects is recommended. Proposed deadline for resolution: within 180 days of appointment as Host City. 5. The ownership and rental/venue use arrangements for competition and major noncompetition venues need some clarification. Proposed deadline for resolution: within 180 days of appointment as Host City 6. Technical feasibility issues remain in respect of the proposed Shooting and outdoor Swimming venues o

Shooting: Feasibility of the site requires further review, however, D2022 have identified alternate site solutions which are likely to meet Games requirements and may present a more feasible solution/s.

o

Swimming: While the current venue proposal presents an attractive sport presentation opportunity, contingency solutions for possible rain and cooler weather will need to be further developed.

Proposed deadline for resolution: within 180 days of appointment as Host City Games Village 7. While the overall concept for the Village is sound and well-conceived, the delivery obligations, land ownership and funding arrangements need to be fully documented to remove any risk for the future Organising Committee. Proposed deadline for resolution: within 180 days of appointment as Host City 8. Durban 2022 is required to confirm to the CGF that the Village design principles and standard of amenity required by the CGF will be met. Proposed deadline for resolution: within 180 days of appointment as Host City Dates and duration of the Games 9. Durban 2022 has proposed a 14-day programme (inclusive of the Opening Ceremony and 13 days of competition) which requires resolution by the CGF Executive Board after the 2015 General Assembly once any amendments to the sports programme are determined. Proposed deadline for resolution: within 90 days of appointment as Host City

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 9 of 54

Bid compliance 10. There remain a number of guarantees outstanding, or for which clarifications are still required. The CGF will require a clear assurance that the balance of conditions outlined in guarantees that have not yet been provided in a compliant form will be met in a timely manner as reflected in this report

Recommendation 1. The CGF Evaluation Commission recommends the CGF General Assembly awards the XXII Commonwealth Games to the South African Commonwealth Games Association (SASCOC) and the Host City of Durban, South Africa. 2. The CGF Executive Board be empowered to enter into the Host City Contract on the basis that: a. The Organising Committee shortfall guarantee has been received b. The CGF Executive Board is satisfied with the plan to meet the 90 and 180 day milestones listed above. c. The CGF Executive Board and Durban 2022 agree to a governance and technical support package that will assure the quality of the Games and will establish a revised Games delivery model for the benefit of Durban 2022, the CGF and all Games participants and stakeholders.

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 10 of 54

PART TWO – DURBAN REPORT

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 11 of 54

1. THEME 1 – GAMES VISION, CONCEPT AND LEGACY 1.1. Overview of Durban proposal Games vision 

The Commonwealth Games in Durban are anticipated to be “a catalyst and a game changer in the lives of many ordinary people”.



The Games will be aligned with and directly contribute to a number of the key priorities of the National Development Plan (NDP), and will assist in the country’s objective of becoming “an active and winning nation” by 2030.



Central to the Durban 2022 proposal is the notion of “how reconstruction and development can build a more inclusive and an empowered nation”.



Durban 2022 has defined four specific elements of the vision: o

For the Games - Providing access to job opportunities and skills empowerment, especially for young people

o

For sport - Providing the platform for focusing on talent identification and high performance opportunities, and showcasing talent

o

For the Commonwealth Games movement - Promoting the benefits that the Games can bring to the host city

o

For the City of Durban - Delivery of infrastructure to create shared social spaces, and showcasing the country and region

Games concept 

The concept is for the Games to be hosted in a compact footprint, with 80% of sports staged within a 2.5km radius, primarily through the development of a “mega multi-sport events precinct” (Moses Mabhida Stadium).



Most competition venues exist already. The Swimming, Hockey and Squash venues will be upgraded and the proposed Shooting venue will be a temporary venue.



The proposed dates for the Games (for 14 days from Monday 18 July to Sunday 31 July) seek to align the Opening Ceremony with Mandela Day. It is anticipated the school holidays will be rescheduled to coincide with these dates.



Other highlights of the concept include: o

A Queen’s Baton Relay that visits all Commonwealth member countries, to generate pre-Games media and build the CGF brand

o

An Opening Ceremony to coincide with Mandela Day (18 July 2022)

o

A cultural programme that extends to ceremonies, music and film activities

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 12 of 54

o

A youth outreach programme

o

An innovative programme of city activities

Games legacy 

The key elements of the proposed legacy programme for Durban 2022 include: o

Acceleration of planned investments (as outlined in the Integrated Development Framework) including the upgrading of selected sport venues

o

Non-sport legacy initiatives, including affordable housing, sustainable multi-purpose community facilities, an upgraded Integrated Rapid Public Transport Network and human capital (skills) development

o

Sport-specific legacy initiatives, including an active participation and youth leadership programme, as well as community sport facilities

o

CGA-related initiatives, including an elite athlete assistance program and academies of sport

1.2. Summary of positive attributes 

The compact proposed Master Plan does not involve the construction of any new permanent venues.



There are significant legacy benefits for Durban and South Africa.



The rescheduling of the school holidays will generate significant operational benefits, most particular for transport.

1.3. Elements for further development 1. Durban 2022 has proposed a 14-day programme (inclusive of the Opening Ceremony and 13 days of competition) which requires resolution by the CGF Executive Board after the 2015 General Assembly once any amendments to the sports programme are determined. Proposed deadline for resolution: within 90 days of appointment as Host City 2. Technical feasibility issues remain in respect of the proposed Shooting and outdoor Swimming venues o

Shooting: Feasibility of the site requires further review, however, D2022 have identified alternate site solutions which are likely to meet Games requirements and may present a more feasible solution/s.

o

Swimming: While the current venue proposal presents an attractive sport presentation opportunity, contingency solutions for possible rain and cooler weather will need to be further developed.

Proposed deadline for resolution: within 180 days of appointment as Host City 3. Legacy plans for the Games are borne out of the legacy plans for the three levels of Government and will be delivered by the same entities that will deliver the long term legacy plans. The CGF recommends that CGF and D2022 revisit the arrangements for legacy delivery, in particular:

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 13 of 54

o

Definition of organisational arrangements including integration, and assignment of specific roles and responsibilities for Games legacy delivery

o

Identification of resources to support Games-related legacy planning and delivery.

1.4. Guarantees and Undertakings Guarantee summary Undertaking The city, country and the CGA recognise and declare that they are aware of the contract which shall be executed with the Commonwealth Games Federation (“CGF”) if the city is elected for the organisation of the 2022 Commonwealth Games (such contract being referred to herein as the “Host City Contract” and such Games as the “Games”) and are prepared to sign the Host City Contract without reserve or amendment.

Compliant

Q1.8

Compliant

Guarantee the investment plans are practicable and compatible with the harmonious development of your country, region and city.

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 14 of 54

2. THEME 2 – PUBLIC AUTHORITY SUPPORT AND GAMES GOVERNANCE 2.1. Overview of Durban proposal Political structure 

South Africa is a constitutional democracy with a three-tier system of government and an independent judiciary.



The President, the National Minister of Sports and Recreation, the National Minister of Finance, the Premier of KwaZulu-Natal (provincial level of government) and the Mayor of eThekwini Municipality (local level of government) will be the strategic political champions of the bid and the execution of the Commonwealth Games 2022.

Political support 

Durban’s bid is supported by the African National Congress (ANC), which holds the significant majority at all three levels of government.



The bid authorities assert that “Based on the widespread cross-party support that the 2010 FIFA World Cup enjoyed, there is unlikely to be significant opposition from the smaller parties, either nationally or provincially.”



Elections are held every five years for each level of government and are scheduled for 2019 (national and provincial) and 2016 and 2021 (local).



No referendum is planned or considered likely.



There are no perceived or potential obstacles arising from national or international obligations binding South Africa that may conflict with any obligations of hosting the Games.



No new laws are considered necessary. Legislation was implemented for the 2010 FIFA World Cup that can be adapted to enable the planning and conduct of the Commonwealth Games.

Public support 

Highlights of the public opinion poll survey conducted in January-February 2015 are: o

56% of respondents strongly agree that they are big sports fans

o

90% of respondents stated that South Africa's hosting of sporting events such as the IRB Rugby World Cup 1995 and the 2010 FIFA World Cup were a success

o

90% of respondents stated that South Africa should submit a bid to host the 2022 Commonwealth Games (93% indicated Durban should submit a bid).

Bid Committee governance 

The board members of the Bid Committee include: o

South African Sport Confederation and Olympic Committee (SASCOC) (3 members)

o

National Government (led by Department of Sport and Recreation) (2 members)

o

KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Government (3 members)

o

City of Durban (2 members).

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 15 of 54



The Registrar of Companies has confirmed the name of the legal entity of the bid committee as SASCOC Bid Company – the Durban Commonwealth Games 2022 Bid Company.

Organising Committee governance 

It is intended the “2022 Commonwealth Games Durban Organising Committee” will be incorporated as a non-profit company under South African company law.



It is proposed the Organising Committee will be constituted with representatives drawn from SASCOC, the national government, the provincial government of KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) and local (Durban) government.



National Government’s commitment to the Games will be channelled through an InterMinisterial Committee that will be set up under the leadership of the Minister of Sport and Recreation. The committee will co-ordinate all functions between the various national, provincial and local government departments. This committee will have full authority to act on all Games related matters, as delegated to it by the National Government.



Ultimate responsibility for ensuring alignment across all Games Partners and supporting governments and their agencies will rest with the Inter-Ministerial Committee.

Intellectual property matters 

Applications for registration of the necessary Trade Marks have been submitted to the Registrar of Trade Marks. Appropriate domain names and social media addresses have been registered.



The Candidate City and the Bid Committee assert that they have not entered into any agreements that could jeopardise, prevent or make impossible the fulfilment of any provision of the Host City Contract.

Immigration, entry-related formalities and other restrictions 

Visitor visas are required for citizens of all countries to visit South Africa for a period of up to 90 days. For 59% of the Commonwealth Games countries these are issued upon arrival.



The processing time for working visa applications involves 5-10 days for visas of up to 90 days, and 4-8 weeks for longer-term visas.



In the context of the Games, certain goods (including firearms and medicines) are listed as ‘restricted goods’ and permits will be required from the South African Revenue Services (Customs).



There are no restrictions or regulations concerning the production and use of media material in South Africa or its broadcast outside of the country; nor are there any legal restrictions on the importation of foreign newspapers, periodicals or other publications.



There are no local union regulations or labour laws that would apply to, or impede, an international suppliers or broadcasters in the delivery of their Games obligations.

2.2. Summary of positive attributes 

The Durban bid proposition enjoys the support of all three levels of government as well as strong public support.



The National Government, through the President of the Republic of South Africa, has provided a guarantee that confirms the government’s full support for the Bid.

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 16 of 54



South Africa has a stable government; the ruling party, the African National Congress (ANC), currently holds a 62% majority in the National Government, 65% at the KwaZulu-Natal provincial level of government and 61% at the local eThekwini local government level.



The Games-specific protocols related to immigration and other entry formalities were successfully tested during the 2010 FIFA World Cup.

2.3. Elements for further development 1. A list of government departments, public authorities and other entities that will have roles in the planning and delivery of the Games is required, clearly specifying the role of each. This list should be supported by a detailed organigram that demonstrates how the entities interact and how decisions are made. 2. The critical coordination role anticipated for the proposed (but not currently constituted) Inter-Ministerial Committee needs to be enabled by an effective cross-government delivery coordination entity with a focus on integration of government and city support for the Games and the assurance of legacy programmes. This should be supported by a clearlydefined set of roles and responsibilities for the various government departments, public authorities and other entities that will have role in the planning and delivery of the Games. Proposed deadline for resolution: within 180 days of appointment as Host City 3. The constitution of the Organising Committee, including Board membership and coordination links with government, needs to be clearly articulated at a conceptual and strategic level to ensure clarity of responsibility and control. Proposed deadline for resolution: within 180 days of appointment as Host City 4. The Presidential guarantee demonstrates the commitment to facilitate entry to South Africa for the Games and for the purpose of undertaking work related to the Games. Further detail is required on the process to issue entry visas to Games personnel arriving from the 41% of countries for which visas are not issued on arrival. The same issue applies to Gamesrelated personnel seeking working visas (including details on how the visa processing times can be expedited). Further detail is also required on the Games-specific arrangements for the smooth entry of Games-related “restricted items”.

2.4. Guarantees and Undertakings Guarantee summary Q2.2

Guarantees, financial or other, obtained from national, regional and local authorities and bodies involved in your project of hosting the Commonwealth Games.

Compliant

Q2.9

Covenant from all authorities (national, regional and local) concerned by your project of hosting the Commonwealth Games.

Compliant

Q.10

Guarantee that no other major event will take place during the Commonwealth Games or one week immediately before or after.

Compliant

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 17 of 54

Q2.12

Documentation indicating that appropriate measures have been taken to protect the word mark “[City] 2022” within the local territory and to register relevant domain names.

Compliant

Q2.13

Declaration from the government of your country stipulating that all necessary legal and legislative measures will be taken to facilitate the protection of Commonwealth Games marks.

Compliant

Q2.15

Declaration from your city authorities confirming that the Bid Committee is empowered to represent the Candidate City and indicating the names of the persons and/or their titles who have the authority to sign contracts and other documents on behalf of the city.

Compliant

Q2.21

Guarantee of entry into your country with the Commonwealth Games identity and accreditation card.

Compliant

Q2.22

Guarantee authorising temporary entry for Games-related personnel to work and domicile in your country prior to the Commonwealth Games.

Compliant

Q2.25

Guarantee authorising the import, use and export of goods required for the Commonwealth Games, free of all customs duties.

Compliant

Q2.28

Guarantee(s) confirming that the legislation necessary to effectively reduce and sanction ambush marketing, eliminate street vending, control advertising space and air space during the period of the Commonwealth Games will be passed no later than 30 June 2018.

Compliant

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 18 of 54

3. THEME 3 – SUSTAINABILITY, ENVIRONMENT AND METEOROLOGY 3.1. Overview of Durban proposal Alignment of the Games with the long-term sustainability strategy of the city and region 



The Durban bid document broadly outlines the Games sustainability objectives, which include: o

Resource efficiency

o

Environmental considerations

o

Social upliftment

o

Alignment with the long-term spatial planning agenda.

Establishment of a Social and Ethics Committee is mandatory under South African law; this committee (to be named the Sustainability and Legacy Commission) will govern how sustainability will be incorporated into the entity’s governance structure.

Air and water quality 

Air quality appears to generally meet WHO guideline standards.



The bid asserts that Durban water can be safely consumed directly from` the tap.

Stakeholder engagement 

Stakeholder engagement will be achieved through the Community Participation and Action Support Unit (CPASU), established by the City of Durban as a vehicle for community members to participate in the governance of the Games and foster a sense of ownership of developments.

Environmental protection objectives 

Six key environmental protection objectives have been identified: o

Utilise existing facilities as far as possible

o

Certify new venues to green building standards

o

Ensure any construction or upgrades to new or existing facilities are conducted in accordance with an Environmental Management Plan

o

Ensure that greenfield development is in line with the City of Durban’s Metropolitan Open Space System (DMOSS) requirements and objectives

o

Minimise waste generation during the Games and ensure that waste is separated at source to reduce volumes requiring landfilling

o

Ensure public transport is available to minimise the need for private transport; the compact venues plan will assist in achieving this



The bid documentation contains a number of plans and intended actions (including by other entities and stakeholders involved in the Games) in regard to sustainability.



The Organising Committee will partner with the Energy Office on all Games energy efficiency and renewable energy initiatives undertaken to ensure alignment with the city’s objectives.

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 19 of 54

Weather conditions 

Durban 2022 have proposed that the Games be conducted during Durban’s “winter” period as this season offers mild temperatures, low rainfall and humidity. Historical weather patterns support this however contingency for cooler and/or wet weather will be required.

3.2. Summary of positive attributes 

The Integrated Development Plan (IDP) for the city prioritises the development of a sustainable spatial, natural and structural environment, as well as creating a quality living environment.



The City of Durban Climate Change Strategy is aligned with the National Climate Change Response White Paper.



The city’s drinking water standard is recorded against the national standard SANS 241:2006 and SANS 17025: the city has received a Blue Drop Certification.



Average rainfall data over the past six years demonstrates that Durban has very low levels of precipitation during the proposed Games period, but there have been years with high rainfall outside the average range during July.

3.3. Elements for further development 1. Further detail is required in respect of the composition and powers of the Sustainability and Legacy Commission, including its specific role and position in planning and operations of the Games and the organisational structure. Similarly, clarification of the relationship between the City of Durban Community Participation and Action Support Unit and the Organising Committee is required. 2. While Durban experiences mild winters, the proposed mid-winter timing of the Games requires further review in relation to some outdoor sports (particularly Swimming).

3.4. Guarantees and Undertakings Guarantee summary Q3.8

Guarantee(s) stating that all construction work necessary for the organisation of the Commonwealth Games will comply with: 

Local, regional and national regulations and acts



International agreements and protocols regarding planning, construction and protection of the environment.

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Compliant

Page 20 of 54

4. THEME 4 – FINANCE AND MARKETING 4.1. Overview of the Durban proposal Organising Committee legal and tax status 

It is proposed the Organising Committee will be incorporated as a non-profit and tax-exempt company under the South African Companies Act. Durban 2022 has advised that payments to and from the CGF will be either tax exempt or will be treated so as to be the equivalent of tax exempt.

Overall Games budget 

Total forecast revenues are GBP 486 million. GBP 255 million and GBP 59 million of which are general subsidies from the National Government, Provincial and City Governments respectively. In addition GBP 32 million of grants from National, Provincial and City governments are committed to specific Games projects. The Organising Committee commercial revenue is estimated to be GBP 140 million.



Operating expenditure is forecast at GBP 486 million. The expenditure forecast in the budget submitted includes allocation to the RSA team preparations (GBP 55.4 million).



The total travel grants budget is ZAR 119 million (GBP 6.6 million at the rate of 1 GBP to ZAR 18.05), including athletes and team officials, technical officials, and dignitaries. The grants have been estimated at ZAR 15 000 per athlete/official (GBP 833) for 6 500 athletes and team officials.



At the conclusion of the Games, remaining Games moveable (physical) assets will be donated to SASCOC for distribution to support South African sport.

Games revenues 

Projected income from domestic sponsorship (including partners, sponsors and suppliers) totals ZAR 914 million (GBP 51 million). A user-pays sponsor hospitality facility is planned at the Durban Country Club, approximately 1.1km from Moses Mabhida Stadium.



It is anticipated one million tickets will be sold at an average price of ZAR 325 per ticket (GBP 18), generating total ticketing revenue of ZAR 325 million (GPB 18 million). These forecasts are based on of 75% of total capacity for Ceremonies, Rugby, Athletics and Swimming and 50% of total capacity for the balance of events. Ticket prices range from ZAR 500 – 2 500 for Ceremonies and from ZAR 150 – 500 for other events (other than Ceremonies, these prices are comparable to those charged for FIFA World Cup group games in South Africa). Access to public transport will be included in the ticket prices.



Licensing revenue of ZAR 20 million (GBP 1.1 million) is forecast. No lottery is planned.



The proposed brand identity and positioning – ‘Ready to inspire’ – amplifies South Africa’s desire to inspire athletes to break records and spectators to experience the city’s culture and heritage. The brand identity will be seeded during the bid phase.

4.2. Summary of positive attributes 

Capital expenditure is limited with most sports facilities already existing subject to upgrading and are conveniently located within a 2.5 km area in the tourist heart of Durban, creating a core heart for the Games.

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 21 of 54



Overall the operations budget of approximately GBP 430 million (net of the RSA team preparation costs) constitutes a funding level similar to recent Commonwealth Games. The proposal includes an allowance for GBP 66 482 per CGA as a Sports Development Grant.

4.3. Elements for further development 1. The guarantee covering a potential financial shortfall was not received at the time the Report was finalised, but is expected to be submitted before the General Assembly. This is a critical requirement. The Bid Committee is continuing to work across the three levels of government to secure the guarantee and has advised that the requirement will be achieved. The Ministerial support enjoyed by the bid is also noted. However, should this guarantee not be received prior to the CGF General Assembly, it is recommended to defer signing of the Host City Contract, until the guarantee is provided. Proposed deadline for resolution: within 90 days of the General Assembly 2. Further clarification is required to ensure that the CGF revenues are not negatively impacted by South African taxes. 3. The guarantee concerning an undertaking that future taxes may not be levied that would affect the Games is outstanding. 4. At a macro level, the overall Organising Committee expenditure budget of approximately GBP 430 million (net of the RSA team preparation costs) appears adequate, however further line by line budget analysis is required to confirm that there is adequate provision to meet the technical and other Games requirements.

4.4. Guarantees and Undertakings Guarantee summary Q4.1

Shortfall guarantee

Outstanding

Q4.2

Additional guarantees obtained:

Compliant



Guarantee that any government service will be provided free of cost to the OC (Guarantee 1 signed by the President)



Guarantee that health services will be provided free of cost to the OC (Guarantee 9)



Guarantee that security services will be provided free of cost to the OC (Guarantee 14)

Q4.3

Guarantee concerning general price control before and during the Commonwealth Games, with particular reference to hotel rates and related services

Compliant

Q4.8

Guarantee concerning new taxes and their impacts on the Games

Outstanding

Q4.14

Guarantee that the OC will cover the travel costs, in economy class, of CGA delegations participating in the Commonwealth Games. The guarantee must specify that the OC agrees to abide by the procedures and deadlines as determined by the

Compliant

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 22 of 54

CGF for the calculation of these travel costs Q4.15

A fully executed copy of the Joint Marketing Programme Agreement with all the required appendices

Compliant

Q4.22

N/A – no lottery is planned; hence no guarantee is required

N/A

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 23 of 54

5. THEME 5 – SPORT 5.1. Overview of Durban proposal Duration of the Games 

A 14-day programme is proposed, inclusive of the Opening Ceremony and thirteen days of competition. The Opening Ceremony is to be held on Monday 18 July 2022 (to coincide with the birthday of Nelson Mandela) and the Closing Ceremony on 30 July 2022.

Hosting capability 

South Africa’s previous hosting experience includes the FIFA 2010 World Cup, 1995 Rugby World Cup, 2003 Cricket World Cup, IPC Swimming World Champs 2006, FINA Swimming World Cup 2006 and 2008, BG Triathlon World Cup 2008, 2012 UCI MTB World Cup, FIVB Beach Volleyball 2013 and the 2013 World Transplant Games.

Sport programme 

The proposed Durban sports programme is aligned with the CGF constitution current at December 2013 (when the bid commenced). Durban 2022 recognises that the CGF sports programme review will conclude at the CGF General Assembly in September 2015, and is prepared to discuss the impacts of any changes at that time. The proposed sports are: Athletics

Netball

Aquatics – swimming

Rugby Sevens (M/W)

Badminton

Shooting:

Beach Volleyball



Pistol

Boxing



Clay Target

Cycling:



Small Bore



Mountain Biking

Squash



Road

Table Tennis



Time Trial

Triathlon

Hockey

Weightlifting

Judo

Wrestling

Lawn bowls 



The proposed para-sport events are: Para Swimming

Para Lawn Bowls

Para Athletics

Para Table Tennis

Wheelchair Basketball

Para Powerlifting

A total of 220 medal events are proposed. This compares with 261 in Glasgow and a proposed 267 in Gold Coast.

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 24 of 54

5.2. Summary of positive attributes 

South Africa has extensive experience in successfully hosting international events.



It is anticipated the school holidays will be rescheduled to coincide with the dates for the Games and thus assist in ensuring that all South Africans will have the opportunity to engage with the Games.

5.3. Elements for further development 1. Durban 2022 has proposed a 14-day programme (inclusive of the Opening Ceremony and 13 days of competition) which requires resolution by the CGF Executive Board after the 2015 General Assembly once any amendments to the sports programme are determined. Proposed deadline for resolution: within 90 days of appointment as Host City.

5.4. Guarantees and Undertakings Guarantee summary N/A – no guarantees required.

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 25 of 54

6. THEME 6 - VENUES 6.1. Overview of Durban proposal Master plan 

Durban’s Master Plan features 80% of the sporting venues situated within a 2.5km precinct radiating from the Moses Mabhida Stadium.



There are no new permanent venues required to deliver Durban’s Games venue solution, and there will be significant upgrades to existing Hockey, Swimming and Squash venues. The proposed Beach Volleyball, Wheelchair Basketball and Shooting venues are temporary.



The compact location of the majority of venues, and the proposal to implement “traffic free cordons” to minimise traffic congestion, will enable spectators to move efficiently through the city and to enjoy direct access to competition venues.



The proposed Games Family Hotel and other main hotels are also located within walking distance of the main sports venue precinct.

Venue delivery process 

Environmental impact statements will be undertaken on all proposed development projects.



The South African Government will modify existing legislation that was enacted for the FIFA World Cup to enable the delivery of Games services and infrastructure within the timeframes required by the CGF.

Concepts for the International Broadcast Centre (IBC) and Main Press Centre (MPC) 

The proposed IBC will comprise a newly constructed 13 000m 2 facility (6 000m2 permanent, 7 000m2 temporary) located on vacant land next to the existing South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) studios. Following the Games the permanent facility will be converted to additional studio space for the SABC. This development is guaranteed by the Ministry of Communications.



The proposed MPC will be a 2 000m2 facility located in the Kingsmead Cricket Grounds, partly in the stands and partly in adjacent and temporary structures. Following the Games the facility will be reinstated to its existing use.



Both the IBC and MPC sites were selected on the basis of proximity and hence connectivity.

Venue use and ownership 

Seven of the proposed competition venues are existing venues, six of which are owned by the Municipality and the seventh (UKZN) by the State: o

o

Moses Mabhida Stadium -

Opening Ceremony

-

Athletics

-

Rugby Sevens

Durban ICC -

Badminton

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 26 of 54

o

o

-

Boxing

-

Judo

-

Weightlifting

-

Wrestling

Durban Exhibition Centre -

Netball

-

Table Tennis

Kings Park Rugby Stadium -

o

Durban Collegians Bowls Club -

o

Swimming

Queensmead Hockey Stadium -



Squash

Rachel Finlayson Pool -

o

Lawn Bowls

UKZN -

o

Closing Ceremony

Hockey

Three temporary venues are proposed on land owned by the Municipality: o

Durban Beachfront -

o

New Beach -

o

Wheelchair Basketball

Beach Volleyball

Bluff Headlands -

Shooting

Venue development 

Venue upgrades (minor permanent works) are the responsibility of the Durban Department of Public Works (DPW) for the Swimming venue, and the University of KwaZulu Natal (UKZN) for the Squash venue. Temporary infrastructure and overlay will be undertaken by the Organising Committee.

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 27 of 54

6.2. Summary of positive attributes 

The cluster of venues within the 2.5km radius provides a compact master plan.



The strong concept and limited capital programme reduces risk, including operational risks. In addition, the venue strategy is in line with the Durban sports development plan and longterm vision for the city.

6.3. Elements for further development 1. Technical feasibility issues remain in respect of the proposed Shooting and outdoor Swimming venues o

Shooting: Feasibility of the site requires further review however D2022 have identified alternate site solutions which are likely to meet Games requirements and may present a more feasible solution/s.

o

Swimming: While the current venue proposal presents an attractive sport presentation opportunity, contingency solutions for possible rain and cooler weather will need to be further developed.

Proposed deadline for resolution: within 180 days of appointment as Host City 2. Clarification is required regarding the integrated development and financing arrangements to ensure delivery of all venues. While there are individual plans for some venues, an overall integrated venue delivery strategy that optimises efficiencies across projects is recommended. Proposed deadline for resolution: within 180 days of appointment as Host City. 3. It is recommended that Durban 2022 undertakes a review of the Venue Master Plan with the CGF to take into account: o

The CGF sports programme decisions at the 2015 General Assembly

o

Resolution of any residual technical design issues, including meeting the requirements of the final venue briefs to be agreed with the CGF, International Federations and Durban 2022.

Note that it is not anticipated this issue would preclude appointment. 4. The Ministry of Communications confirms that the Government has guaranteed the use and/or construction of the International Broadcast Centre and Main Press Centre. There will be a residual issue regarding for the MPC that will necessitate a carve-out clause with the current lease holder to ensure the necessary access and use of the venue in the lead up to and during the Games. 5. The ownership and rental/venue use arrangements for competition and major noncompetition venues need some clarification. Proposed deadline for resolution: within 180 days of appointment as Host City.

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 28 of 54

6.4. Guarantees and Undertakings Guarantee summary Q6.4

Guarantees for the financing of work

Clarification required

Q6.5

Guarantees for use of venues and control of commercial rights

Compliant

Q6.11

Guarantees of use and/or construction for the IBC and MPC, including construction timelines, financing, possession, retrofit and vacation dates

Compliant

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 29 of 54

7. THEME 7 – COMMONWEALTH GAMES VILLAGE 7.1. Overview of Durban proposal Village concept 

The proposed Village development is the first stage of a multi-billion rand mixed use and mixed development ‘greenfield’ project spanning 20 years to be undertaken by the City of Durban in partnership with the province.



The 16-18-hectare site is located in the new neighbourhood of Cornubia, approximately 19km from the Mosses Mabhida Stadium and some 15km south of the new King Shaka International Airport.



The proposed Cornubia development will make a contribution to the long-term issue of housing shortages in Durban, delivering 24 000 homes, of which 15 000 are earmarked for subsidised housing and the balance to cater to a wide range of affordability levels.



The Village will adhere to the principles of sustainable development, including the use of sustainable construction methods and building materials.

Village design 

The entire Village site will be a secure facility with full perimeter fencing.



The Residential Zone (9.5 hectares) will feature a dam setting and a number of open spaces and amenity areas. A combination of low, medium and high rise permanent apartment buildings will be constructed, all of which will have lifts. All Games requirements in respect of bedroom size, office space and living space will be met.



The raw floor space per person within the living area of the Village is 17.82m2 per person. The configuration of rooms is 270 single rooms and 3 120 double rooms, yielding a total of 6 510 beds.



The 24/7 restaurant service (5 200m2) will have a peak capacity of 2 000 diners and will be supplemented by three stand-alone bistros at strategic locations within the Village, each capable of accommodating up to 200 diners (300m 2 per bistro).



The Operational Zone (3.1 hectares) will house all the operational functions and activities of the Village, including all transport and housekeeping facilities.



The International Zone (3.4 hectares) will have a range quality temporary structures housing all the necessary services.



With the exception of site management traffic on the periphery of the Village, the facility will be car free. Parking provision for staff, dignitaries, VIPs and CGA vehicles will be provided outside the high security zone.



The Village will be constructed in compliance with South African National Standards 10400-S (SANS 10400-S), which are in line with international accessibility standards. A total of 180 rooms (360 beds), representing 5% overall, will be wheelchair accessible.

Village development 

Development will be the responsibility of a private developer. The City of Durban will have responsibility for construction of Village road infrastructure and connections as well as water and sewerage connections.

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 30 of 54



Village overlay will be contracted and managed by the Organising Committee.



The proposed commercial arrangements for the Games involve the Organising Committee paying a rental fee to the developer for the duration of the use. While there is no commercial risk for the Government or the OC for this Village scheme, the National Government has guaranteed the delivery of a Games Village should this private scheme not be achievable.

Long-term feasibility 

After the Games, the apartments will be sold on the private market, in consultation with the property owners (Tongaat Hulett Developments).

7.2. Summary of positive attributes 

The development of Cornubia responds to the housing needs in the City of Durban. The city’s Integrated Development Plan proposes Cornubia as a mixed use and mixed development priority project spanning more than 20 years.



The accommodation will be an attractive mix of apartment types, giving maximum flexibility for the Games, and positive post-Games saleability.



The village will be constructed in compliance with the South African National Standards 10400-S (SANS 10400-S), which are in line with international accessibility standards.

7.3. Elements for further development 1. While the overall concept for the Village is sound and well-conceived, the delivery obligations, land ownership and funding arrangements need to be fully documented to remove any risk for the future Organising Committee. Proposed deadline for resolution: within 180 days of appointment as Host City 2. It is noted that the Village is well served by utilities infrastructure (water and sewerage) given the broader development programme for Cornubia which is well beyond the initial Village requirements. However current planning assumes augmentation of main grid power with temporary power. This will require careful planning if “green energy sourcing” is to be a feature of the Village. In addition, attenuation of emissions and noise will require appropriate solutions to ensure a high standard of amenity in the Village. 3. Durban 2022 is required to confirm to the CGF that the Village design principles and standard of amenity required by the CGF will be met, including the following: o

Capacity to address the 5% of contingency beds required above the planned 6 510 beds

o

Bedroom to bathroom ratio

o

Accessibility

o

Lift capacity, including for management of diverse mobility requirements

o

Treatment of site grade for wheelchair users and diverse mobility requirements

o

Water safety with regard to the lake

o

Vehicle flows, vehicle and general circulation space within and outside of the indicated perimeter, with consideration to the efficient operation of the Village, and

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 31 of 54

general amenity and comfort of the residents and staff, noting that the total Village area while meeting the general space requirements of previous Games Villages is being planned within a 16 - 18 hectare site compared to 35 hectares in Glasgow, and approximately 30 hectares for Gold Coast. Proposed deadline for resolution: within 180 days of appointment as Host City. 4. A more detailed Village post-Games legacy plan is required, backed by a feasibility study for the new inventory. These legacy plans should be developed by the Bid Committee in close consultation with the city and the developer. 5. Village development timelines need to be clarified with government authorities and the ultimate developer to ensure the site is handed over to the Organising Committee six months before the opening of the Village.

7.4. Guarantees and Undertakings Guarantee summary Q7.2

Guarantee stating that the site chosen for the Commonwealth Games Village is in keeping with the city development plan and the standards to be met to obtain planning permission

Compliant

Q7.5

Guarantee stating that the owners of the Commonwealth Games Village agree to include the OC as part of the design team

Compliant

Q7.6

Guarantees for the financing of work

Compliant

Q7.7

Guarantees for government subsidies and/or rental costs related to the Commonwealth Games Village

Compliant

Q7.8

Guarantees of use for existing buildings and infrastructure

Compliant

Q7.9

Guarantee(s) stating with which international and national accessibility standards the Commonwealth Games Village conforms/will conform

Compliant

Q7.11

Guarantee for the control of commercial rights

Compliant

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 32 of 54

8. THEME 8 – MEDICAL AND DOPING CONTROL 8.1. Overview of Durban proposal South Africa’s health care system 

The National Health Act 61 of 2003 regulates both the public and private streams of health care delivery in South Africa. This legislation provides for basic health care rights, including the right to emergency treatment (applying to foreigners as well as local residents).



There are 4 200 public health facilities in South Africa. Free health care for children under the age of six and for pregnant or breastfeeding mothers was introduced in the mid-1990s.



Responsibility for developing a sustainable, coordinated, integrated and comprehensive public health care system rests with the province. The two agencies with primary responsibility for health care responsibilities in Durban are:



o

The KwaZulu-Natal Department of Health funded by the National Treasury (through the National Health Insurance scheme)

o

The City of Durban Municipal Heath Care Unit, dealing with primary health care and communicable diseases.

All visiting Games constituents will be treated free of charge in nominated hospitals for acute and emergency care during the Games period.

Emergency services and disaster planning 

Emergency ambulance services are delivered by both provincial health departments and private companies in South Africa. A toll-free emergency phone number links these services through an emergency control centre.



The state and private companies are supplemented by voluntary ambulance services, including the South African Red Cross and St John Ambulance, which are self-dispatching.



It is proposed the existing emergency services protocols are maintained for the Games as far as possible.



Disaster management in South Africa is governed by the Disaster Management Act, which provides for the coordinated response of police, military, health, fire and emergency services organisations. Legislation provides for additional resources from neighbouring cities and countries to be brought in, should the need arise during the staging of major events.

Games-specific health services 

The Inkosi Albert Luthuli Hospital is proposed as the primary hospital for treatment of all Games constituents, supplemented by a number of other designated hospitals within 15km range of the Games Village.



For the Games, a training and recruitment programme for emergency medical services will be initiated to ensure adequate resources are available to meet the Games requirements. The same protocols were used in preparation for the FIFA World Cup in South Africa.

Doping control 

The South Africa Institute for Drug Fee Sport (SAIDS) Anti-Doping Rules were codified in 2015 within the broader framework of the South African Institute for Drug Free Sport Amendment Act 25 of 2006.

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 33 of 54



The WADA- accredited laboratory in Bloemfontein (located 644km from the Games Village) will be used to satisfy the testing requirements for the Games.

8.2. Summary of positive attributes 

The National Government has guaranteed to fund all medical-related costs for the delivery of the Games.



The South African epidemiological alert system is capable of addressing disease detection and notification and will enable border and internal risks to be monitored leading into and during the Games.

8.3. Elements for further development 1. The Minister of Health has guaranteed that there will be no cost to the Organising Committee for any Government related health expenses, but clarification is required regarding medical services for Games constituents who are foreign nationals. 2. It is not clear what additional capacity exists at the Bloemfontein laboratory to cope with the anticipated demands of the Games.

8.4. Guarantees and Undertakings Guarantee summary Q8.12

Guarantees related to Anti-doping

© Commonwealth Games Federation

Compliant

July 2015

Page 34 of 54

9. THEME 9 – SAFETY AND SECURITY 9.1. Overview of Durban proposal Overall risk assessment 



The following assessments provided in the bid documentation in respect of the specific Games security risks have been prepared by the relevant municipality heads: o

Intrusion into Games facilities - LOW

o

Fire - buildings, industry, forests - LOW

o

Civil disorder - LOW

o

General crime, including thefts, robberies, assaults etc. – RISKS WILL BE MINIMISED

o

Serious organised crime including corruption – RISKS WILL BE MINIMISED

o

Technological risks to essential Games services, including cybercrime - LOW

o

Traffic and transport, such as major transport accidents, including in tunnels - LOW

o

Natural catastrophes, including earthquake, flood, volcano, hurricane etc. - LOW

o

Chemical, biological and/or nuclear catastrophes - LOW

o

International terrorism – RISKS WILL BE MINIMISED.

The risk posed by activist minorities or domestic terrorist groups is also perceived as low based on an assessment developed in consultation with the Deputy Head of the Durban Metro Police.

Games security provision 

The Bid document confirms that the public and private organisations involved in the provision of Games security will be coordinated by the Safety and Security Department, which in turn will be responsible for implementing the plans developed by the Organising Committee and the Games Working Group.



All existing police and security organisations in Durban with responsibilities relevant to the security of the event will be involved in the planning and delivery of the Games security operation.



The South African Government will take full responsibility for the safety and security of the Games. The Government will activate its joint operational and intelligence structures which coordinate the safety and security measures as a whole. It is proposed a Safety and Security Department will be included in the Organising Committee with responsibility for ensuring the consistent and timely delivery of Games security.



Oversight will be provided by the Games Security Working Group, comprising the national and provincial leaders of: o

Armed Forces

o

South African Police Service (SAPS) and Metro Police

o

Immigration

o

Border Control and Customs

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 35 of 54



o

National Intelligence

o

Transport and Infrastructure.

Durban, and South Africa generally, have demonstrated the ability to deliver an effective security programme to support the recent hosting of a variety of major events.

Security resourcing and governance 

It is anticipated Games security will be undertaken by 18 000 SAPS offices from KwaZulu Natal, supplemented by 1 272 Metro Police and 781 Metro Traffic Officers from Durban.



The security provisions within the Games venues will be delivered by private security contractors. There are 50 000 registered personnel in Durban; hence it is not anticipated that there will be any shortage of personnel for the Games.



The national Safety at Sports and Recreational Events Act 10 of 2010 (SASREA) permits the formation of a single management structure to coordinate the planning, delivery and administration of resources. The principles embodied in the Act were applied during the organisation of the 2010 FIFA World Cup, and will also be applied during the Games.



The South African Government has indicated its willingness to modify laws to satisfy the requirements of the Games if required, and did so in order to meet the requirements of hosting the 2010 FIFA World Cup.



Legislation also exists to protect airspace as needed.

9.2. Summary of positive attributes 

The South African Government has guaranteed provision of the safety and security requirements for the Games.



The Durban 2022 submission on safety and security draws heavily on the planning and operation for safety and security that was successfully delivered for the FIFA 2010 World Cup. This security operation was characterised by good working collaboration between the local organising committee (LOC) and the various South African security and emergency services agencies.



SAPS has a tried and tested approach that has been used in previous mega events and it will apply the most appropriate model for the Commonwealth Games, taking into consideration the unique nature of the Games.



South Africa has demonstrated the ability to deploy large volumes of police for previous events, as follows: o

ICC Cricket World Cup 2003

(539)

o

FIFA World Cup 2010

(16 100)

o

COP 17 2011

( 3 680)

o

BRICS 2013

(1 585)

o

AFCON 2013

(2 100).

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 36 of 54

9.3. Elements for further development 1. Further clarification is recommended regarding the control and accountabilities (including budget responsibilities) across the various security agencies and the OC, including: o

Venues security design and overlay costs, including costs related to fencing and CCTV augmentation as well as hostile vehicle mitigation and search equipment (typically these are OC costs)

o

Safety and security costs associated with accreditation, ceremonies, Queen’s Baton Relay and live sites

o

Alignment of budget allocation, decision making and delivery responsibilities

o

Assurance on the adequacy of the budget allocated for contracted security guards (from ‘bump-in’ to ‘bump-out’).

9.4. Guarantees and Undertakings Guarantee summary Q9.4

Guarantee(s) for the safety and peaceful celebration of the Commonwealth Games – national, regional and/or local governments (if applicable)

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Compliant

Page 37 of 54

10. THEME 10 - ACCOMMODATION 10.1. Overview of Durban proposal Accommodation capacity 

A total of 5 092 hotel rooms currently exist in Durban within a 0-10km radius of the Moses Mabhida Stadium (the designated point of reference for the accommodation plan).



Additional accommodation facilities (such as lodge, bed & breakfast, guest house, country house) for up to 1 350 people exist within a 0-50km radius.



This total capacity of 9 292 hotel rooms and other accommodation options is considered adequate to support the CGF’s contractual requirements for 4 000 rooms to host the Games.



To date, 3 022 rooms have been secured including 1 897 under specific hotel agreements and 1 125 across seven hotels under a single agreement from the parent company, Tsogo Sun



A further 1 150 rooms have been provisionally secured under a general agreement with the National Accommodation Association of South Africa.

Games Family accommodation 

The five-star Hilton Hotel (room capacity 341), located next to the Durban International Convention Centre and close to the city centre and beaches, is proposed for the accommodation of the Games Family.



Durban tourism and hotel operators have agreed that 2022 room rates will be calculated by applying a consumer price index to 2015 hotel rates. No minimum stay requirements will apply.

10.2. Summary of positive attributes 

All Games accommodation will be provided within the City of Durban.



A hotel agreement that meets the specifications of the Candidate City Manual is in place for 3 022 rooms.



The location of the proposed Games Family Hotel, proximate to 80% of the competition venues, represents a significant benefit for the Games Family.



As a key tourism destination in South Africa with annual tourist figures of 3.8 million, Durban has an established tourism industry including the City of Durban, Provincial Tourism and KZN Tourism.

10.3. Elements for further development 1. While agreements are in place for 3 022 rooms the CGF requires that the necessary 4 000 hotel rooms are contracted before 2 September 2015, and notes that this is a minimum requirement with additional accommodation required (example Glasgow 2014 8 000 rooms). 2. The CGF recommends that in drafting and negotiating the final detailed and comprehensive accommodation agreement (typically undertaken post-appointment), the language © Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 38 of 54

addressing the 7% annual increase in room rates must be reconciled between the accommodation agreement and the cover letter that states 7% minimum, but higher if actual CPI is higher, to enable the rates in 2022 to be based on actual annual CPI increases from 2015 to 2022. 3. Clarification of the arrangements to secure accommodation at appropriate 2022 rates is required (including for the Games Family Hotel) to ensure the avoidance of any price gouging for rates that are not guaranteed. Specifically it is recommended that: o

The secured rate guaranteed inventory of hotel rooms is clarified

o

The allocation of rooms to Games constituents/clients is confirmed (in particular the allocations for media and technical officials)

o

The OC undertakes to cover any potential price rise beyond the guaranteed room rate provided by the Hilton Hotel, in 2015 rates, as follows:

o

-

King/Twin Hilton Guestroom – GBP 188 (R 3 400)

-

King Hilton Deluxe – GBP 208 (R 3 750)

-

King/Twin Hilton Executive Room – GBP 244 (R 4 050)

-

Executive Suite – GBP 438 (R 7 900)

-

Terrace Suite – GBP 479 (R 8 650)

-

Presidential Suite – GBP 715 (R 12 900)

The new hotel agreement format mandates that all room rates be expressed in GBP.

4. Once the contracting process is completed, it is recommended Durban 2022 reviews the initial accommodation allocations by client group (for Games Family, media, technical officials, spectators and others) against the final number of secured rooms to ensure all obligatory requirements are met. It is recommended consideration is also given to addressing the requirements of other client groups.

10.4. Guarantees and Undertakings Guarantee summary Q10.2

Statement from your national tourist board describing your country’s hotel rating system and Candidate City hotel room inventory. List of the Candidate City’s total hotel room capacity, guaranteed by the national tourist board

Compliant

Q10.7

Guarantees of use for other accommodation

N/A

Q10.9

Games Family rate guarantee

Compliant

Q10.13

Guarantees from individual hotels concerning room availability, room rates, minimum stay/room block waves, other price controls and binding contracts

Partially compliant

Q10.14

Construction authorisation, works timelines and finance

N/A

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 39 of 54

guarantees for hotels/other accommodation to be built

11. THEME 11 - TRANSPORT 11.1. Overview of Durban proposal Games transport strategy 

The stated general objective of the Durban transport strategy is to facilitate travel with minimum interventions and cost efficiency.



Durban aims to create an integrated event transport system that links the event venues in a safe, efficient and reliable manner. The Games Family will use special, dedicated fleets, while spectators and workforce will access Games venues using public transport.

Delivery of transport infrastructure and transport operations 

The only major transport infrastructure project in Durban’s propositions is the ongoing development of the new Integrated Rapid Public Transport Network (IRPTN). Two corridors of IRPTN (the C1 BRT corridor and the C2 upgraded rail corridor) are highly relevant to Games transport.



The eThekwini Transport Authority (ETA) will be the lead agency for planning and delivering transport infrastructure, managing transport services, and coordinating its partner agencies.



The involvement of all relevant transport authorities will be integrated through a Transport Control Group (TCG) to be led by the ETA. The TCG will identify key roles, responsibilities and communication protocols and will develop the related activity plans.

Air transport 

The primary airports to be used for the Games are the King Shaka International Airport of Durban (located 32km from the Games Family Hotel and 12km from the Games Village) and O. R. Tambo International Airport in Johannesburg. Neither requires any capacity improvements for the Games.



The current international connectivity of King Shaka International Airport is limited. However, the O.R. Tambo airport has frequent connections to 16 destinations in Africa, eight destinations in Europe, four destinations in Middle East and six destinations in Asia. The two airports are connected by 33 domestic flights daily.

Motorways and main roads 

A grid of north-south and east-west national and regional roads will be used effectively to separate general traffic from Games traffic. The grid will allow for tailored routes for spectators and the Games Family.



Most of the Games facilities are located within short distances of these roads.

Spectator and workforce transport 

The strategy for spectator and workforce transport involves: o

Maximising the use of existing and new public transport systems , and discouraging private car use for accessing the Games venues

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 40 of 54



o

Utilising the new Integrated Rapid Public Transport Network (IRPTN), and especially corridors C1 and C2. This will be supplemented by a ‘hub and spoke’ park and ride system, and by the existing People Mover system operating within the Games Precinct. For the Park and Ride system, approximately 8 000 parking spaces will be available at sites in the North, West, and South of the Games precinct, and a high number of buses and mini-buses will be used to provide shuttle services

o

Providing free public transport (including park and ride) for Games ticket-holders and accredited individuals.

Currently public transport journeys represent 54% of all motorised journeys; this percentage is expected to remain the same in 2022.

Games Family transport 

Games Family transport benefits from the compact Games footprint, with 80% of the sporting venues located within a 2.5km radius. Journeys between the Games Village and the competition and non-competition venues will utilise the existing road network comprising motorways and arterial roads.



A Games Road Network (with the N2, N3 and M4 freeways at is core) will improve travel times. There will be no exclusive Games lanes in the Games Road Network.



Separate transport fleets will be dedicated to each client group within the Games Family. Transport routes will be segregated from public access to ensure safety and reliability.

Media transport 

Buses and mini-buses will be used for media transport. The ‘hub and spoke’ media system will connect media accommodation sites, the MPC/IBC and the Games venues. The system’s hub will be located at the MPC/IBC.



All accredited media will have free access to public transport.

Travel times 

Given the very compact competition venue Master Plan, the travel time between the Commonwealth Games Village and most of the competition venues is within 25 minutes.



About 70% of training venues will be within 25 minutes from the Village, while the longest journey will last 43 minutes.



Durban 2022 will manage network congestion by scheduling school holidays during the Games, promoting carpooling and flexible working hours, and investing in communication campaigns.



Traffic restrictions have been identified in each of the nine zones of the Games.

Transport Command Control and Coordination 

The Transport Control Group will be responsible for transport during the Games.



The existing Traffic Control Centre at the Disaster Management Centre will be used as the Transport Control Centre during the Games.



Traffic will be managed using the existing, integrated traffic signal management system supported by CCTV cameras.

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 41 of 54

11.2. Summary of positive attributes 

The transport strategy benefits from the compact nature of the venue Master Plan.



Durban has an existing public transport network that includes rail, bus, and mini-bus taxis. The strategy to integrate this existing system with the future Integrated Rapid Public Transport Network (IRPTN) will benefit spectator and workforce transport.



The construction of the (IRPTN) has already commenced and is due for completion prior to the Games. Two of the corridors, the C1 BRT corridor and the C2 rail corridor serve directly the Games Precinct.



Durban has a benign traffic environment (compared to other major world cities) with morning and evening peaks lasting about one hour each.



The road network around the main Games Precinct near Moses Mabhida Stadium is regularly used for events and there are traffic measures implemented to support these events. Durban’s transport plan will also benefit from the experience of the FIFA World Cup transport operation.

11.3. Elements for further development 1. Further detail is required on the analysis undertaken to date to ensure the proposed spectator and workforce transport and public transport systems are capable of serving the estimated spectator and workforce demand. Reference to statistics (estimates) are required that validate the system has adequate capacity to meet the expected Games demands. A broad outline of the proposed structure of the bus networks for athletes, media and technical officials is also desirable. 2. Further information is required on the IRPTN in respect of its scope, capacity and overall impact on the public transport system. The information should show how the enhancements will support meeting Games capacity demands, providing a brief summary of each project and the related benefits. 3. The strategy for achieving the forecast travel times in the absence of dedicated Games lanes needs to be elaborated, in particular how it will be possible to “separate general traffic from Games traffic”. This could include further analysis that may identify bottlenecks and the strategies that would be required to address the specific challenges. 4. The role of the Organising Committee in delivering Games Family and venue transport needs to be clearly articulated, in terms of specific the roles and responsibilities and budget accountability. 5. It is recommended the proposed routes for all road events are refined to minimise the impact of the road event routes on transport (noting that this should not preclude appointment, but will be an early priority for the Organising Committee).

11.4. Guarantees and Undertakings Guarantee summary Q11.2

Guarantee for the transport and traffic management command and control centre

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Compliant

Page 42 of 54

Q11.3

Guarantees for planned and additional transport infrastructure projects

Requires clarification

Q11.5

Guarantees for projected capacity improvements at your airport(s)

Compliant

Q11.10

Guarantees for projected fleet and rolling stock capacity improvements

Requires clarification

Q11.17

Transport systems guarantee

Compliant

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 43 of 54

12. THEME 12 – TECHNOLOGY 12.1. Overview of Durban proposal Telecommunications market 

The Telecommunications Act of 2006 is the primary legislation regulating telecommunications and endeavours to promote competition between systems and services. There are currently two fixed telephony network licences and four second and third generation mobile telephone services licences issued in South Africa.



The telecommunications regulator, the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA), focuses primarily on promoting competition, innovation and investment. ICASA’s mandate is set out in legislation that regulates electronic communications, broadcasting and postal services.



ICASA is the body responsible for issuing licences and also controls and allocates the frequencies necessary for radio transmissions.

Existing infrastructure and technology networks 

The City of Durban has installed eThekwini Metroconnect, a high speed, Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) enabled network, built on redundant fibre optic that spans the municipal area. This will be supplemented by the investment of ZAR 560 million in 2015/16 to develop the city-wide fibre optics backbone.



Almost all competition and non-competition venues are equipped with fibre optics linked to the eThekwini Metroconnect network.



The Next Generation Network (NGN) was set up in 2008 to provide city-wide carrier data services for the municipality. Currently, the NGN provides mobile coverage to both competition and non-competition venues. Cellular service providers will bring in mobile switching units to increase the capacity at each venue when required.



No major additional infrastructure for fixed and mobile networks is required to support the Commonwealth Games. Major events such as the 2010 FIFA World Cup have been held without any network capacity constraints.



The OC will pay standard tariffs for the use of fixed and mobile network infrastructure during the Games.

Private radio networks 

South Africa has a single commercial, ICASA-licensed, radio trunking network operator that delivers trunking, PTT (Push-to-Talk) and DMR (Digital Mobile Radios) national coverage solutions for all sectors. At December 2014 the operator had more than 79 000 subscribers.

Energy 

Eskom, the state-owned electricity utility, is the sole generator of electrical power in South Africa. Locally, the City of Durban is the licensed electricity distributor. Power is delivered through a municipal-owned electrical grid throughout the City of Durban.



Most of South Africa's electricity is generated by coal-fired power stations, and a small percentage by hydroelectric schemes and a nuclear power station. The City of Durban also boasts Africa’s first and only landfill gas to electricity generation sites.

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 44 of 54



The City of Durban continuously invests in expansion and replacement programmes to improve the capacity, quality and reliability of the electricity network. The South African grid is currently experiencing capacity constraints because of new construction and delayed maintenance programmes. This situation is projected to last for the next three years, by which time a capacity surplus will have been re-established.



The competition venues identified for the Commonwealth Games will have adequate electrical capacity and interconnected feeds from more than one source, based on a complete temporary power solution, fulfilling the requirement for additional capacity at Games time. Electricity supply to temporary facilities will also be provided by mobile generation units and back-up from existing networks.



The provision of uninterruptible power for broadcasting services will be achieved by using synchronised diesel generators with dual redundancy.

12.2. Summary of positive attributes 

Known as the first “Smart City” in Africa, Durban is the first city in South Africa to have implemented the Next Generation carrier network throughout the city. Durban was also the first city to implement an ICT incubator which mentors micro enterprises and facilitates their growth into the open market.



The eThekwini Metroconnect high speed fibre network is available at (or proximate to) all proposed venues.



No additional infrastructure for fixed and mobile network is required to support the Commonwealth Games.

12.3. Elements for further development 1. Durban 2022 has highlighted the long-term plans and investments proposed to enhance the energy grid serving Durban generally and all Games venues specifically. In addition to mains power, Durban 2022 proposes substantial augmentation through temporary power and has provided an initial financial allocation within the Organising Committee budget to support this. A priority for Durban 2022 (post-appointment) is the ongoing development of the energy plan, mapped to confirmed infrastructure investments and updated budget assumptions, to be supported by supplemental national government and city funding where required.

12.4. Guarantees and Undertakings Guarantee summary Q12.8

Guarantee that the competent body is prepared to allocate the necessary frequencies for the organisation of the Commonwealth Games

Compliant

Q12.9

Guarantee that there will be no fee charged to the Commonwealth Games Family for the reservation and services of allocated frequencies during the Commonwealth Games

Compliant

Q12.15

Energy guarantee

Compliant

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 45 of 54

PART THREE – APPENDICES

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 46 of 54

APPENDIX A – EVALUATION COMMISSION TERMS OF REFERENCE 1. The CGF’s Executive Board has appointed the following Evaluation Commission to review bids for the 2022 Commonwealth Games: o

Louise Martin – CGF Honorary Secretary

o

Maxwell de Silva – Secretary General, Sri Lankan Commonwealth Games Association

o

Ian Hooper – Director of Sport and Infrastructure, Glasgow Life

o

Andrew Ryan – Executive Director, ASOIF

o

David Grevemberg – Chief Executive, CGF.

They will be supported by up to seven CGF appointed technical advisors who will travel with the Commission who, while not members of the Commission, will provide process and expert assistance to the Commission and will engage in all Commission sessions. The Commission will also seek further independent advice from other Games technical specialists who will assist the evaluation process remotely. All technical advisors will be independent of any bid and have been contracted so as to ensure their impartiality. 2. The Commission shall study all the technical aspects of candidatures, inspect the sites proposed by the Cities, including all sport venues and major non-competition venues, and submit a written report to the CGF Executive Board. 3. Importantly, the report will focus only on the technical elements of the cities’ bids. It will assess if the cities meet the technical requirements established by the CGF, as well as all responses to themes provided in the Candidate City Manual. 4. The CGF’s Members will also receive a copy of the report of the Commission ahead of the General Assembly at which the next host city will be selected. 5. No member of the Commission is a national of a country which is bidding for the relevant edition of the Commonwealth Games. 6. The Commission’s activities will be co-ordinated and facilitated by the CGF’s CEO. 7. The Evaluation Commission report will be published by 31 July 2015 unless otherwise advised by the CGF.

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 47 of 54

APPENDIX B – MAP A (DURBAN CONCEPT MAP)

See next page for full-size map

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 48 of 54

APPENDIX C - EXTRACT FROM CGF STRATEGIC PLAN 2015-2022 Transformation 2022 Strategic Priority One Innovative Games We deliver inspirational and innovative Commonwealth Games and Commonwealth Youth Games, supported by a dynamic Commonwealth Sports Cities Network

Guiding principles In doing so, we will uphold and embed the following guiding principles in all our work with candidate and Host Cities/CGAs, IFs, all Games delivery stakeholders and client groups: To be inspiring and impactful through our decisions, actions and narrative. We aim to maximise efficiency and effectiveness in our delivery of a world-class event with real community relevance that is both affordable and universally appealing.

Actions to achieve Strategic Priority One 1. By Q3 2015, approve a new Sports Programme of compulsory and optional sports (including para-sports), and associated athlete quotas, athlete attraction strategies, athlete performance pathways, stabilised competition formats and optimised competition schedules for the Commonwealth Games in 2018 and beyond. 2. By Q1 2016, develop and augment the positioning and awareness of the Commonwealth Youth Games product. 3. By Q2 2016, review and update the Coordination Commission and Transfer of Knowledge processes, to ensure innovation, efficiency, collaboration, integration and leadership. 4. By Q2 2016, and enshrined in the 2022 Host City Contact, establish a Games Delivery Partnership model that positions the CGF and Host CGAs as delivery partners and support financial, operational and reputational efficiencies and outcomes. 5. By Q2 2017, develop and implement a Commonwealth Sports Cities Network in collaboration with local authorities and CGAs to enable, support and engage cities aspiring to host the Games and other sport events in the Commonwealth. 6. By Q4 2017, share expertise and champion best practice in the fields of social, economic, cultural and environmental impact to nurture sustainable Games legacy for host cities/nations and their local communities, aligned with the UN’s post 2015 Sustainable Development Goals.

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 50 of 54

APPENDIX D – RISK ASSESSMENT Durban 2022 submitted a detailed risk assessment as part of its Candidature submissions to the CGF, as specified within the Candidate City Manual. The Evaluation Commission has reviewed this risk assessment. The Evaluation Commission adopted a risk-based approach to evaluating submissions from Durban 2022. The Evaluation Commission has focused on critical issues that may impact the overall delivery of the Games. A range of risks was considered and risk weighted based on the likelihood of occurrence and the impact (financial, reputational and overall Games and legacy delivery). While at this stage of Games planning a range of risks will be expected, the Evaluation Commission focused on matters which, in the absence of treatment in the near term, could impact the foundations of the Games. As outlined in the introductory section of this report, ten of those issues require immediate attention (within 90-180 days of any such appointment), should Durban be appointed as Host City.

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 51 of 54

APPENDIX E – GUARANTEE SUMMARY Following is a summary of the status of guarantees received from the Durban 2015 Bid Committee: Q1.8

Guarantee the investment plans are practicable and compatible with the harmonious development of your country, region and city.

Compliant

Q2.2

Guarantees, financial or other, obtained from national, regional and local authorities and bodies involved in your project of hosting the Commonwealth Games.

Compliant

Q2.9

Covenant from all authorities (national, regional and local) concerned by your project of hosting the Commonwealth Games.

Compliant

Q2.10

Guarantee that no other major event will take place during the Commonwealth Games or one week immediately before or after.

Compliant

Q2.12

Documentation indicating that appropriate measures have been taken to protect the word mark “[City] 2022” within the local territory and to register relevant domain names.

Compliant

Q2.13

Declaration from the government of your country stipulating that all necessary legal and legislative measures will be taken to facilitate the protection of Commonwealth Games marks.

Compliant

Q2.15

Declaration from your city authorities confirming that the Bid Committee is empowered to represent the Candidate City and indicating the names of the persons and/or their titles who have the authority to sign contracts and other documents on behalf of the city.

Compliant

Q2.21

Guarantee of entry into your country with the Commonwealth Games identity and accreditation card.

Compliant

Q2.22

Guarantee authorising temporary entry for Games-related personnel to work and domicile in your country prior to the Commonwealth Games.

Compliant

Q2.25

Guarantee authorising the import, use and export of goods required for the Commonwealth Games, free of all customs duties.

Compliant

Q2.28

Guarantee(s) confirming that the legislation necessary to effectively reduce and sanction ambush marketing, eliminate street vending, control advertising space and air space during the period of the Commonwealth Games will be passed no later than 30 June 2018.

Compliant

Q3.8

Guarantee(s) stating that all construction work necessary for the organisation of the Commonwealth Games will comply with:

Compliant



Local, regional and national regulations and acts



International agreements and protocols regarding

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 52 of 54

planning, construction and protection of the environment. Q4.1

Shortfall guarantee

Outstanding

Q4.2

Additional guarantees obtained:

Compliant



Guarantee that any government service will be provided free of cost to the OC (Guarantee 1 signed by the President)



Guarantee that health services will be provided free of cost to the OC (Guarantee 9)



Guarantee that security services will be provided free of cost to the OC (Guarantee 14)

Q4.3

Guarantee concerning general price control before and during the Commonwealth Games, with particular reference to hotel rates and related services

Compliant

Q4.8

Guarantee concerning new taxes and their impacts on the Games

Outstanding

Q4.14

Guarantee that the OC will cover the travel costs, in economy class, of CGA delegations participating in the Commonwealth Games. The guarantee must specify that the OC agrees to abide by the procedures and deadlines as determined by the CGF for the calculation of these travel costs

Compliant

Q4.15

A fully executed copy of the Joint Marketing Programme Agreement with all the required appendices

Compliant

Q4.22

N/A – no lottery is planned; hence no guarantee is required

N/A

Q6.4

Guarantees for the financing of work

Clarification required

Q6.5

Guarantees for use of venues and control of commercial rights

Compliant

Q6.11

Guarantees of use and/or construction for the IBC and MPC, including construction timelines, financing, possession, retrofit and vacation dates

Compliant

Q7.2

Guarantee stating that the site chosen for the Commonwealth Games Village is in keeping with the city development plan and the standards to be met to obtain planning permission

Compliant

Q7.5

Guarantee stating that the owners of the Commonwealth Games Village agree to include the OC as part of the design team

Compliant

Q7.6

Guarantees for the financing of work

Compliant

Q7.7

Guarantees for government subsidies and/or rental costs related to the Commonwealth Games Village

Compliant

Q7.8

Guarantees of use for existing buildings and infrastructure

Compliant

Q7.9

Guarantee(s) stating with which international and national accessibility standards the Commonwealth Games Village conforms/will conform

Compliant

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 53 of 54

Q7.11

Guarantee for the control of commercial rights

Compliant

Q8.12

Guarantees related to Anti-doping

Compliant

Q9.4

Guarantee(s) for the safety and peaceful celebration of the Commonwealth Games – national, regional and/or local governments (if applicable)

Compliant

Q10.2

Statement from your national tourist board describing your country’s hotel rating system and Candidate City hotel room inventory. List of the Candidate City’s total hotel room capacity, guaranteed by the national tourist board

Compliant

Q10.7

Guarantees of use for other accommodation

N/A

Q10.9

Games Family rate guarantee

Compliant

Q10.13

Guarantees from individual hotels concerning room availability, room rates, minimum stay/room block waves, other price controls and binding contracts

Partially compliant

Q10.14

Construction authorisation, works timelines and finance guarantees for hotels/other accommodation to be built

N/A

Q11.2

Guarantee for the transport and traffic management command and control centre

Compliant

Q11.3

Guarantees for planned and additional transport infrastructure projects

Requires clarification

Q11.5

Guarantees for projected capacity improvements at your airport(s)

Compliant

Q11.10

Guarantees for projected fleet and rolling stock capacity improvements

Requires clarification

Q11.17

Transport systems guarantee

Compliant

Q12.8

Guarantee that the competent body is prepared to allocate the necessary frequencies for the organisation of the Commonwealth Games

Compliant

Q12.9

Guarantee that there will be no fee charged to the Commonwealth Games Family for the reservation and services of allocated frequencies during the Commonwealth Games

Compliant

Q12.15

Energy guarantee

Compliant

© Commonwealth Games Federation

July 2015

Page 54 of 54