associated magnetic excitations in Hg1201 (Yuan Li talk)
Using polarized neutron diffraction over the last 6 years: LLB-Saclay, ILL-Grenoble
Magnetic order in the pseudogap state of high-Tc cuprates (examples in 4 different families: YBCO, Hg1201, LSCO, Bi2212)
Do we have a broken symmetry below T* ?
Philippe Bourges Laboratoire Léon Brillouin, CEA-Saclay
Orbital-like Order in Several Families of Cuprates
La2-xSrxCuO4
• K. Conder, E. Pomjakushina, N. Christensen (Riso), J. Mesot (PSI, Switzerland)
• Yuan Li (MPI), G. Yu, M. Chan (University Minnesota) •M. Greven (University Minnesota,USA) •P. Steffens (ILL-Grenoble) HgBa2CuO4+x
• X Chaud (CRETA, Grenoble), LP Regnault (CEA Grenoble) •H.A. Mook (Oak Ridge, USA) YBa2Cu3O6+x
• V. Balédent (PHD), B. Fauqué, S. Pailhès, Y. Sidis (Laboratoire Léon Brillouin - Saclay) (Y,Ca)Ba2Cu3O6+x • D. Haug, C.T. Lin, V.Hinkov (MPI Stuttgart)
Collaborators :
1) Motivation: Loop-current order 2) Neutron scattering 3) Long range magnetic Q=0 AF order in YBCO and Hg1201 4) Preliminary result in Bi2212 5) Short range magnetic order in LSCO 6) Updated phase diagram in YBCO and Implications
Outline:
Hidden order parameter: Spin Density Wave, Charge DW, more Exotic: Circulating current, D-Density Wave,… Electronic Liquid Crystal
Role of the related fluctuations in the SC pairing mechanism?
Quantum critical point?
Broken symmetry?
Order parameter?
Pseudo gap: Hidden Ordered State
C.M. Varma, PRB 73, 155113 (2006)
Cu
Phase ordonnée
O
supra
- Yields a sizeable magnetic moment of 0.1 µB
Kaminski et al. Nature 416, 610 (2002).
Dichroic signal in ARPES in BiSrCaCuO
Circulating currents: phase ΘII - Respects Translation Symmetry (q = 0 transition) - Breaks Time-Reversal symmetry
2 current loops circulating clockwise and anticlockwise => producing Orbital moments
4 possible domains
Toroidal moment
In each unit cell:
• 3-band Hubbard model: Cu(dx2−y2), O(2px), O(2py)
Circulating Currents:
2 type of Domains at 90°
In k-space: Q=(H,K)
vecteur vector d'onde Wave
nuclear
NSF
SF
magnetic
Orbital moments (⊥ ⊥ CuO2 plane) measurable with neutron diffraction
Ising-type
C.M. Varma, PRB (1997)(2006)
Q=0 Orbital AF
Circulating currents
Intensité intensity
In k-space: Q=(H,K)
Orbital moments (2D Ising)
S. Chakravarty PRB (2001)
CC-phases NMR Silent Probe
measurable with neutrons
C.M. Varma, PRB (1997)(2006)
Charge currents: DDW and Circulating currents
Spin
Orbital
Polarized neutron cross sections
* Magnetic Scattering
•Nuclear Scattering Non spin flip:
Neutron polarization: p=(I--I+)/(I-+I+) ~ 96%
Flipping ratio: R=NSF/SF=I-/I+ (R ~ 50)
H=10 G, P//H
Polarizing mirror
Polarized monochromatic neutron beam : 4F1-LLB
h
OD
(twinning: 10L=01L)
A systematic study on 8 different samples (different origin, twinned [t] or detwinned [d])
YBa2Cu3O6+x
Underdoped YBa2Cu3O6.6 H.Mook’s sample (Tc=63 K) [t]
UD89 (x=0.85 ,Tc=89K) [t]
OD75 (x=1, Tc=75 K) [t]
Y0.85Ca0.15Ba2Cu3O6+x
UD68 (x=0.75 ,Tc=75K) [t]
UD64 (x=0.6 , Tc=64 K) [d]
UD 61(x=0.6 , Tc=61 K) [t]
UD54 (x=0.5, Tc=54 K) [t]
UD35 (x=0.45, Tc=35 K) [d]
n =0.19 picture Very consistent hole doping
UD
Generic phase diagram
on (Y,Ca)Ba2Cu3O6+x
Polarized neutron scattering experiments
temperature
N.B. L=1, weak nuclear Bragg peak
For Q=(0,1,1): |FN|2/ |FM|2 =400
R: flipping ratio
(per triangle)
m~0.1 mB
No effect on Q=(002) (open symbols)
Tmag
B. Fauqué et al, PRL 96 197001 (2006)
Polarized neutron results in YBCO: P//Q, Q=(0,1,1)
Weak or zero structure factor for Q=(2,0,1)
Angle (M,c*) ~ 45 deg
Polarization analysis:
For Q=(1,0,1):
YBCO6.6 : H.A. Mook et al, PRB 020506(R) (2008).
(H,0,0)
(ξ>50 Å)
• L-scan Long range order
(1,0,1)
0 0.4
20
40
60
80
100
0.6
0.8
Magnetic
1.2
(1 0 L)
1
Nuclear Peak
1.4
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
1.6
70 K - 300 K
SF HF P//Q (101)
YBCO: Long range magnetic order
H.A. Mook et al, PRB 020506(R) (2008).
(0,0,L)
- Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy Arkady Shekhter
B. Leridon et al EPL, 87, 17011, (2009)
- Uniform magnetic susceptibility
J. Xia, et al, PRL, 100, 127002 (2008)
B. Fauqué et al, PRL 96 197001 (2006) H.A. Mook et al, PRB 78 020506 (2008)
color map: [ρ ρab(T)-ρ ρab(300K)]/T
Other reports of a phase transition at T*: - Polar Kerr effect
T. Ito et al PRL 70 (1993) 3995
Resistivity in YBCO
Phase diagram: Magnetic order at Tmag ~T*
T. Ito et al PRL 70 (1993) 3995
A single scaling factor with |M|2 for all doping
Comparison with resistivity
• Cu-O octaedra
• Tetragonal • 1 CuO2 Plane
Breakthrough in single crystal synthesis in Hg1201: mass ~ 1 g, M. Greven (Stanford/Univ Minnesota) Zhao et al., Adv. Materials, 18, 3243 (2006).
• Orthorhombic • 2 CuO2 Planes • distorded CuO2 planes • Cu-O pyramids
From YBa2Cu3O6+x to HgBa2CuO4+x
R> 90
m ~ 0.2 µB
Q=(1,0,1) P//Q
Yuan Li et al, Nature 455,372 (2008).
Polarized neutron results in Hg1201
Comparison Resistivity ∆ρ
Q=0 AF Magnetic order at Tmag ~T*
Tmag-> 0 at p=0.19, expected end point of the pseudo-gap phase NMR, Entropy, resistivity, ARPES…. Tallon and Loram, Physica C (2001,2004) Quantum Critical Point
B. Fauqué et al, PRL 96 197001 (2006) H.A. Mook et al, PRB 78 020506 (2008) Y. Li et al, Nature 455 372 (2008)
"Universal" phase diagram: from YBa2Cu3O6+x to HgBa2CuO4+x
Angle (M,c*) ~ 45° .... Origin ?
C. Weber et al, PRL 102, 017005 (2009).
Chandra Varma Spin moment on O sites (should have been detected by NMR.....) talk Quantum Monte-Carlo calculations
or
or even
Orbital or spin magnetic moments ?
Stanescu, Philipps PRB 69, 245104 (2002).
- Intra unit cell magnetism (2 antiparallel moments) electronic nematicity by STM in Bi2212 M.J. Lawler et al Nature 2010 - Cu spins alone cannot account for this magnetic phase. Seamus Davis - One needs to reconsider the role of oxygens talk -Effective 1 band model 3 bands Hubbard model
Q=0 AFM, What are the implications ?
L=3
Tc=83K
Bragg peaks at (10L) for L odd (Tetragonal notations) 45 deg to the inc modulation
Annealed with p(O2)=0.05 atm at 450°C
S. de Almeida F. Giovanelli I. Laffez University of Tours (France)
Large single crystal growth
Preliminary results in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ
In te n s ity (M n = 3 1 0 4 )
300
350
400
450
500
50
150
200
Temperature (K)
100
Q=(1 0 3)
SF NSF x 1/45.5
250
300
0
AF
0.05
0.1
mag
SC
T
0.25
Bi-2212
0.2
doping
0.15
pseudogap
T*
0.3
A. Kaminski et al, PRL, 90 207003 (2003)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
resistivity in thin films
Q=0 AF Magnetic order in Bi-2212
Temperature (K)
Incommensurate AF fluctuations (Spin density wave) Fingerprint of dynamical stripes Static stripe phase for Nd co-doping or with Ba
µSR, NMR,…
Tranquada et al, Nature 1995, 2004 Lattice invariance and fourfold symmetry broken
•
•
Mitrovic et al, PRB 78 014504 (2008)
bond centered charge stripes
LSCO case: Charge inhomogeneities: Stripes
3 Samples (7 g) (from PSI, E. Pomjakushina) co-aligned with x=0.085, Tc=22 K. Tetragonal notations Orbital-like moments at Q=(10L)
Inc
H//Q
(M< 0.02 µB)
No Long Range ordered moment in LSCO
R-1 =R0-1 +M2/NSF
For
Q=(1,0,1)
(R-1=SF/NSF)
Inverse Flipping Ratio : R-1
Bourges and Sidis, arXiv: 1101.1786
YBCO6.6 from Fauqué et al, 2006
Search for Static Q=0 AF order in La1.915Sr0.085CuO4
ξ110 ~ 11 Å
No signal in NSF channel
Spin-flip H//Q
• • •
2D : Around Q=(1,0,L) any L
(H,0,0)
•
(1,0,1)
V. Balédent et al, PRL 105, 027004 (2010)
ξ100 ~ 8 Å
ξ=2/∆ ∆q
Along 100
In plane Correlations length:
Along 110
2D Short range magnetic correlations La1.915Sr0.085CuO4 (0,0,L)
Temperature dependence
• Q-Integrated intensity (as Bragg scattering in YBCO6.6) 1.2 mbarns Local moment ~ 0.1 µB
• I(H//Q)=I(H//z)+I(H//y) • I(H//z) ~ I(H//y) isotropic moments or angle (M,c*) ~ 45 deg
• Tmag ~ 120 K for 8.5% Lower than generally expected T*
Polarisation analysis
Polarization analysis and T-dependence : La1.915Sr0.085CuO4
below Tmag ~120K
intensity
Upturn of IC
AF order and IC fluctuations
interplay between the Q=0
Unpolarized neutron E= 4 meV (2T-LLB) Incommensurate magnetic fluctuations at Qinc=(1/2±δ δ,1/2,0)
Tmag=120K
V. Balédent et al,PRL 105, 027004 (2010)
Temperature dependence of Q=0 AF order
AF domains
with circulating currents
2-leg charge ladder
For x=0.085 ~ 1/12
Mixte phase ?
ξ(100)
ξ(110)
no phase coherence
V. Suchaneck et al., PRL, 105, 037207 (2010).
Zn induces low energy incommensurate spin excitations near (π,π) π,π)
V. Balédent et al., PRB 83, 104504 (2011).
Same Tmag but weaker intensity
Swiss cheese model
1/Flipping Ratio=R-1=SF/NSF = R0-1 +M2/NSF
Zn known not to change T* (NMR Knigh shift, Alloul et al, 1993)
Zn(2%)-YBa2Cu3O6.6 : Tc = 30 K
⇒ Electronic nematic liquid state (ELC)
Q=0 AF
R-1=SF/NSF = R0-1 +M2/NSF
(D. Haug, MPI Stuttgart)
TC =35K, Hole doping= 0.085
Hinkov et al., Science 319, 597 (2008).
Detwinned YBa2Cu3O6.45
Q=(100)
Q=0 AF order develops close to Tmag ~150K ~ Tnematic
IN YBCO6.45
It is generally assumed that T* increases (No compelling evidence that this is correct for T* above Room Temperature )
whereas
Near 9% Tmag decreases with doping
V. Baledent et al., PRB 83, 104504 (2011).
Comparaison Q=0 AF Bragg peak intensity in YBCO
Q=0 AF order
Anisotropic Nerst effect in YBCO R. Daou et al Nature (2010)
QO
V. Baledent et al., PRB 83, 104504 (2011).
No QO
YBCO: Updated Phase diagram
⇒ There are associated specific magnetic excitations (next talk, Yuan Li)
⇒ Hidden order parameter of the pseudogap phase having the symmetry proposed for the loop current order (talk Chandra Varma)
Bourges and Sidis, arXiv: 1101.1786
• Technique: Polarized neutron diffraction • Result: Magnetic order in the pseudogap state of high-Tc cuprates in 4 different families: YBCO, Hg1201, LSCO,Bi2212 • Implication: There is a broken symmetry below T* which does not break the translation symmetry but breaks Time reversal symmetry
Conclusions: