Oilfield services market conditions and trends 2016 Segments: drilling, well maintenance and workover, and geophysics September 2016
Oil price volatility has grown considerably over recent years. The uncertainty makes it complicated for companies to establish long-term plans. Forecasted weighted average* oil price USD/barrel
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Deloitte, 30 June 2016
2016
2017F
2018F
2019F
2020F
Worldbank, 26 July 2016
Source: Deloitte and Worldbank forecasts * The weighted average price is a combination of the prices for Brent and WTI crude oil taken with equal weights
High volatility and controversial trends
• The considerable reduction in oil prices and volatility on the oil market in 2014-2015 forced analysts to review short-term oil price forecasts regularly. • As of the beginning of the second half of 2016, most experts agree that oil price recovery is going to be slow.
© 2016 Deloitte & Touche Regional Consulting Services Limited
Oilfield services market conditions and trends 2016 Segments: drilling, well maintenance and workover, and geophysics
2
Despite the downward trend in the commodity markets, Russian companies have set a drilling record.
Average annual oil price and drilling metreage
Neutral to positive expectations of market participants RUB/barrel
Million m
24
3500 3000
19
2500 2000
14
1500 1000
9
500
• 2015 saw a continued disruption in the correlation between oil prices and drilling metreage: despite the sharp decrease in oil prices, metreage increased by over 10 percent. • The increase in metreage may have been caused by market expectations. According to Deloitte’s 2016 Russian Oil and Gas Outlook Survey, based on interviews with executives from Russian enterprises, 61 percent of experts expect a rise in oil prices in 2016. • Despite the neutral to positive expectations, in order to relieve the impact of the current decline in oil prices, the key market players aim to reduce operating costs and improve operating efficiency.
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Oil price (weighted average)
Metreage
Capital investments plans for 2016, billion RUB
Capital investment plans for 2016, billion RUB
+30%
2016 -9%
2015 -9%
780 600
607
550
396
360
+60 %
-9% 92.9
85
61.7
99
• According to the 2016 Russian Oil and Gas Outlook Survey, 55 percent of experts believe that capital flow into the Russian oil and gas sector will not decline for, at least, the next five years. • The growth of uncertainty on the market has become one of the reasons why there is no trend towards changing the amount of capital investments in 2016 among the largest vertically integrated oil companies (VIOC). At the same time, the majority of market leaders are not planning to cut capital investments abruptly, which confirms the absence of exceedingly negative expectations. • According to VIOC representatives, upstream will be the main focus for capital investments. Funds will be allocated towards maintaining and expanding exploration and production.
Source: Company data; the amount of investment includes foreign assets. © 2016 Deloitte & Touche Regional Consulting Services Limited
Oilfield services market conditions and trends 2016 Segments: drilling, well maintenance and workover, and geophysics
3
Despite the existing uncertainty on the market, according to 2016 results, production and exploratory drilling metreage are expected to grow.
Production drilling, million m +13%
+12%
+1% 24.5
1.7 2.9 3.6 4.9
21.9 19.4
2.7 3.8 4.1
5.8
5.0
2013
2014
Bashneft Tatneft
1.6 2.9
Slavneft
2.8
Gazprom Neft
4.3 6.7 2015
Surgutneftegaz Rosneft
2016*
0.87**
0.82
0.82
0.11
0.08
0.20
0.23
0.22
0.20
0.15
0.17
0.11
2013
2014
2015
0.74 0.11
0.17
Lukoil 12.0
+18%
Other
Russneft
2.3
1st half-year
20.8
-10%
0.21
1st half-year
-7%
Exploration drilling, million m
0.50
2016*
Source: “Oil and Gas Vertical” magazine (CDU TEK), company data,
Source: “Oil and Gas Vertical” magazine (CDU TEK), company data,
*Deloitte forecasts
*Deloitte forecasts
• In 2015, the total production drilling market grew by 13 percent.
• In 2015, the exploratory drilling market volumes decreased by 10 percent, which was due to the uncertainty on the market and the suspension of participation in expensive exploration projects.
• Most key players expanded drilling volumes having implemented their annual plans for production drilling. • According to the representatives of most companies and actual Q1 data, companies are not planning to reduce the volumes of production drilling in 2016. • Rosneft stands out among the key players as it is planning to boost the volumes of production drilling by no less than 30 percent.
• At the same time, according to the results of the first half-year of 2016, exploratory drilling grew by 11.2 percent as compared to the same period last year. • Hence, in 2016 exploratory drilling metreage is expected to grow, and, by the end of the year, metreage is predicted to be 18 percent higher than in 2015. ** The forecast has been reviewed due to the positive trends demonstrated by the companies at the end of the first half-year of 2016.
© 2016 Deloitte & Touche Regional Consulting Services Limited
Oilfield services market conditions and trends 2016 Segments: drilling, well maintenance and workover, and geophysics
4
Horizontal drilling remains a key driver for metreage growth in 2015; directional drilling is growing more slowly.
Directional drilling, million m -16%
Horizontal drilling, million m +33%
+4%
+27%
16.6
7.4
1.5 14.0 2.4 2.7
-39% +4% -17%
1.3 1.5
2.8
-17% -34%
14.6
Other
1.7
Bashneft Russneft
1.2 1.9
+3%
4.6
3.9 3.8 -23%
4.4 2013
+32%
3.4 2014
Source: “Oil and Gas Vertical” magazine (CDU TEK)
0.6
4.5
4.3 0.3
+23%
0.8
+176%
Gazprom Neft
0.5
+11%
Lukoil
0.9
Tatneft Slavneft
Surgutneftegaz Rosneft
2015
0.4
-16% +16%
5.8 0.4
+5%
0.9
+31%
1.6
-7%
0.9
1.0
+38%
0.4
0.3
+40%
1.3
1.4
1.6
2013
2014
1.0
2.2
2015
Source: “Oil and Gas Vertical” magazine (CDU TEK)
• The 2015 market continued the trend observed in 2014: horizontal drilling metreage increased considerably as compared to the previous year—by 27 percent. It is horizontal drilling that currently drives the metreage growth in the Russian Federation. Most key players continued to increase metreage in horizontal drilling. According to the year’s results, metreage in horizontal drilling exceeded metreage in directional drilling at Gazprom Neft and Slavneft. • Metreage in directional drilling grew by 4 percent in 2015, which was not as considerable as the growth in horizontal drilling metreage. The major boost in directional drilling volumes was due to increased drilling by Rosneft (by 32 percent) as well as by small and medium-sized oil companies. At the same time, Lukoil and Gazprom Neft have reduced directional drilling metreage considerably. © 2016 Deloitte & Touche Regional Consulting Services Limited
Oilfield services market conditions and trends 2016 Segments: drilling, well maintenance and workover, and geophysics
5
Western Siberia remains a leader in drilling volumes; however, the share of other regions has grown considerably over 2014-2015.
Metreage distribution in production drilling 20.8 million m 5.8% 10.0%
19.4 million m 8.7% 12.2%
Metreage distribution in exploratory drilling
21.9 million m 7.9% 14.2%
0.82 million m 10.0%
Other regions
24.5%
0.82 million m 15.9%
17.4%
27.8%
30.4%
56.3%
52.2%
2014
2015
Volga District 84.2%
2013
79.1%
2014
3.8% 3.4%
4.5%
77.9%
Far East
1.9%
Caucasus and Southern Federal District
5.0%
Timan-Pechora Eastern Siberia
2014
2015
Source: “Oil and Gas Vertical” magazine (CDU TEK), Deloitte analysis
65.5%
2013
2015
1.7% 2013
Western Siberia
0.74 million m
2.7% 5.3% 3.4% 2013
6.3%
13.5%
5.8% 2014
2015
Source: “Oil and Gas Vertical” magazine (CDU TEK), Deloitte analysis
• Western Siberia is still Russia’s main oil region, accounting for 78 percent of metreage in production drilling and 52 percent in exploratory drilling in Russia in 2015. However, since 2013, the share of Western Siberia in the total metreage across the abovementioned regions has decreased by 6 and 13 percentage points, respectively. • Stable and fast growth in drilling volumes has been continuously observed in Eastern Siberia: metreage for 2013-2015 is three times higher, and comprised 5 percent of production drilling and 13.5 percent of exploratory drilling in Russia in 2015. • Drilling volumes in the Far East continue to change considerably year-on-year: while in 2015, the share of production drilling increased by 0.7 percentage points, a fall by 1.4 percentage points was observed in exploratory drilling. © 2016 Deloitte & Touche Regional Consulting Services Limited
Oilfield services market conditions and trends 2016 Segments: drilling, well maintenance and workover, and geophysics
6
Supply and demand on the drilling market has not seen significant changes; however, EDC’s share has been decreasing, and the number of medium and small suppliers is growing. Supply on the drilling market (based on metreage)
Demand on the drilling market (based on metreage)
8%
28%
33%
Other
6%
KAToil-Drilling
Tagras 15%
21% 20%
6%
14%
Targin 14%
11%
13% 13%
20%
20%
21%
2014
21%
EDC
30%
25%
2015
Source: Company data
Bashneft Tatneft
Lukoil
Gazprom Neft
Surgutneftegaz 28%
Russneft
Slavneft
Eriell RN-Drilling
Other
Surgutneftegaz Rosneft
2014
2015
Source: “Oil and Gas Vertical” magazine (CDU TEK)
High demand concentration and considerable segmentation of suppliers • The four largest Russian oil companies continue to account for most of the drilling demand on the market–more than 75 percent. • EDC remains the only large independent supplier on the drilling market; however, its market share shrank considerably over 2015–from 28 to 21 percent.
• Despite market expectations, Rosneft has not demonstrated significant growth in the use of its own drilling capabilities. © 2016 Deloitte & Touche Regional Consulting Services Limited
Oilfield services market conditions and trends 2016 Segments: drilling, well maintenance and workover, and geophysics
7
The increase in the volumes of capital investment in the construction of production wells is due to the desire to sustain production levels at mature oil deposits. Capital investment in the construction of production wells, billion RUB +11%
+15%
669.8 581.9 523.4
41.5 91.7
344.3
36.3 51.0
70.6
Timan-Pechora
Eastern Siberia
435.3
Volga District
Western Siberia
2013
2014
Source: “Oil and Gas Vertical” magazine (CDU TEK)
2015
+15%
669.8
Caucasus and Southern Federal District
124.1
119.9
370.4
+11%
Far East
581.9 523.4
47.5
61.7
33.0 66.6
28.3 62.8 104.5
74.8 31.6 77.5 109.8
136.1 103.8
79.0
84.6
164.2
178.5
2013
2014
Other Bashneft Russneft Tatneft Slavneft Gazprom Neft Lukoil
227.5
Surgutneftegaz Rosneft
2015
Source: “Oil and Gas Vertical” magazine (CDU TEK)
• Western Siberia accounted for the majority of capital investment in 2015. Capital investment in Russia’s main oil region increased by 17 percent as compared to 2014. • Capital investment in Eastern Siberia has increased by 70 percent since 2013, which is due to increased production in the region. • Most key players on the market have increased their capital investments as compared to 2014, which is due to the depletion of major highlyproductive “old” fields (experiencing the necessity of increasing their oil recovery and replacing worn out equipment). • Most companies claim that they are not planning to reduce capital investment in the construction of production wells in 2016.
© 2016 Deloitte & Touche Regional Consulting Services Limited
Oilfield services market conditions and trends 2016 Segments: drilling, well maintenance and workover, and geophysics
8
Due to uncertainty on the market, companies are reducing capital investment in the construction of exploration wells.
Capital investment in the construction of exploration wells, billion RUB +43%
-1% 76.3 8.1
53.2
11.9
75.7 3.3 17.1
Timan-Pechora
13.9
19.9
29.4
32.3
33.3
2014
Source: “Oil and Gas Vertical” magazine (CDU TEK)
• • • • •
2015
16.4
3.5
22.3
75.7
Other
10.9
Bashneft
Russneft 6.0
Tatneft
17.0
Slavneft Gazprom Neft
12.4
20.3
9.8 Western Siberia
2013
53.2 6.8
Eastern Siberia Volga District
-1% 76.3 4.1
Caucasus and Southern Federal District
3.9 18.6
+43%
Far East
11.5 2013
20.6 2014
Lukoil Surgutneftegaz
14.1
Rosneft
2015
Source: “Oil and Gas Vertical” magazine (CDU TEK)
As compared to the considerable increase in capital investment in the construction of exploration wells in 2014, 2015 saw a small fall. Capital investment increased by 16 percent in Eastern and Western Siberia, but fell considerably in the Timan-Pechora Region. Pressured by the uncertainty on the market, key players have reduced their capital investment in the construction of exploration wells. Surgutneftegaz is one of the few companies on the market that has expanded capital investment, having increased it more than 1.5 times. Most companies claim not to be planning further reductions in capital investment in the construction of exploration wells in 2016.
© 2016 Deloitte & Touche Regional Consulting Services Limited
Oilfield services market conditions and trends 2016 Segments: drilling, well maintenance and workover, and geophysics
9
The rise in expenses for well maintenance and workover is due to the desire to increase oil recovery at existing oil deposits.
Well maintenance costs, billion RUB -14%
3.2 7.7 9.1
-6%
+11%
45.7 8.2
Workover costs, billion RUB
43.9 39.4 2.1
130.9
Bashneft
16.1
Tatneft
Surgutneftegaz
28.8
16.3 30.8
Lukoil Rosneft
2015
109.1 6.6
Gazprom Neft
8.5
2014
17.5
Slavneft
8.4
10.6
115.9
Other Russneft
3.8
12.2
+20%
2016*
37.0
40.4
2014
2015
2016*
Source: Source:CDU TEK, * Deloitte predictions
Source: Source:CDU TEK, * Deloitte predictions
• In 2015, total well maintenance costs were reduced by 14 percent. • Most key players, except Surgutneftegaz and Tatneft, reduced their investment in maintenance. • Q1 2016 witnessed a 10 percent rise in well maintenance costs as compared to Q1 2015. • Therefore, in 2016 the decrease in well maintenance costs will probably slow down and, by the end of the year, total well maintenance costs may go back to their 2014 level.
• In 2015, the total amount of companies’ investment in workover decreased by over 6 percent. • Despite the decrease in total costs, almost all key players increased their investment in workover. • Q1 2016 saw a significant growth in investment in workover both by large and small companies. • Workover costs may rise by 20 percent in 2016 as compared to the previous year.
© 2016 Deloitte & Touche Regional Consulting Services Limited
Oilfield services market conditions and trends 2016 Segments: drilling, well maintenance and workover, and geophysics
10
Western Siberia is losing its share in well maintenance and workover costs. In 2015, investment in maintenance in the Volga District and Eastern Siberia grew considerably. Well maintenance distribution by region RUB 45. 7 billion 7.3%
Workover distribution by region RUB 115. 9 billion
RUB 39.4 billion 7.2%
34.7%
44.0%
4.9%
Other regions
51.7%
Volga District 58.1%
48.8%
2015
1.4% 1.1%
1.3% 0.9%
1.1% 2014 Source: CDU TEK, * Deloitte analysis
8.0%
54.4%
Western Siberia
2014
3.7%
RUB 109.1 billion
Far East
43.4%
37.7%
2014
2015
Caucasus and Souther Federal District
3.2%
Timan-Pechora
0.5%
1.8%
Eastern Siberia
2.8%
2015
2014
2.6%
3.2% 2015
Source: CDU TEK, * Deloitte analysis
• In 2015, the distribution by region on the maintenance market changed considerably. • Western Siberia, which is the leader in well maintenance costs, lost 9 percentage points of its share to the Volga District and Eastern Siberia in 2015. The distribution of other regions by aggregate well maintenance costs changed insignificantly. • The distribution of regions by costs on workover also underwent changes over the past year. The Volga District’s share grew by 3 percentage points, the Far East–by more than five times, whereas Western Siberia’s share fell by over 6 percentage points. • The shares of the Caucasus, Timan-Pechora and Eastern Siberia in the investment in workover increased insignificantly.
© 2016 Deloitte & Touche Regional Consulting Services Limited
Oilfield services market conditions and trends 2016 Segments: drilling, well maintenance and workover, and geophysics
11
In 2015, the government and investors reduced financing of geophysical surveys. Offshore projects are seeing a cost decrease.
Market share of geophysical surveys in the mining and oil and gas industries -11%
RUB 81 billion 14.3 6.1
RUB 72 billion 4.1
5.2
Other sources of finance Federal budget
60.4
62.8
2014
2015
Equity capital
Geophysical survey costs fall • In 2015, the market share of geophysical services (Geographic Information System (GIS) and seismic survey) amounted to RUB 72.06 billion, which is 11 percent less as compared to 2014. • Russian and foreign investors have considerably reduced financing volumes. Economic sanctions are still limiting capital inflow. • Reduction of governmental expenses has resulted from the anticipating reduction of the federal budget. This reduction was caused by budgetsaving measures. • In 2016, investments will probably continue to decrease; however, stabilisation is expected in 2017.
Source: Federal Agency for Mineral Resources, Deloitte analysis
Territorial structure of the exploration works market in the oil and gas industry -32%
RUB 250 billion 97.8
-77% -4%
RUB 170 billion 23.8
151.8
146.0
2014
2015
Source: Federal Agency for Mineral Resources, Deloitte analysis © 2016 Deloitte & Touche Regional Consulting Services Limited
Offshore exploration works Onshore exploration works
Offshore exploration works reduction • In 2015, costs for exploration works saw a decrease. Costs for offshore works were reduced by 77 percent, which is considered the most dramatic reduction as compared to 2014. • A high offshore production cost, which is often unjustified as oil prices are low, was the main cause of offshore works reduction. • Additionally, a reduction of offshore exploration works occurred due to the postponement of drilling works on 10 of Rosneft’s large projects. The above was caused by the outflow of foreign partners from the country and by economic sanctions.
* Regional budgets of the Russian Federation, credits, funds received from Russian and foreign investors Oilfield services market conditions and trends 2016 Segments: drilling, well maintenance and workover, and geophysics
12
In 2015, the seismic exploration market saw a significant slow down.
Seismic exploration 2D*, line km 28%
Seismic exploration 3D*, sq. km
-44%
-17%
143,000 line km
-22%
68,000 sq. km Другие
112,000 line km
Novatek
90.2
80,000 line km 73.1 42.4 6.2 34.4
2013
57,000 sq. km
Slavneft
33.3
2014
28.9
Surgutneftegaz
4.2 12.6
Gazprom Lukoil
13.3
10.0
7.8
22.4
10.9
2015
44,000 sq. km
Bashneft
Rosneft
Source: Federal Agency for Mineral Resources, Deloitte analysis
8.7
2013
6.5
21.9
20.0 6.1 7.2
2014
2015
Source: Federal Agency for Mineral Resources, Deloitte analysis
• In 2015, in terms of the fields of 2D and 3D seismic exploration, the market was down by 44 percent and 22 percent, respectively, on a year-to-year basis. • The 2D seismic exploration segment saw the most significant cost reduction. This is because companies are gradually shifting to 3D seismic exploration as a more informative option. • Rosneft is considered the key demand booster on the 2D seismic exploration market with a 28 percent market share in 2015. • Gasprom is considered the key demand booster on the 3D seismic exploration market with a 45 percent market share in 2015.
* - the market includes both oil and gas and mining industries © 2016 Deloitte & Touche Regional Consulting Services Limited
Oilfield services market conditions and trends 2016 Segments: drilling, well maintenance and workover, and geophysics
13
Trends on the Russian oilfield services market Positive trends • Market stabilisation, “new reality” in the economy • Growth in drilling, well maintenance and workover volumes • Growth in demand for local services • Strong interest from Asian investors
Customer pressure • Requirements for continuous quality enhancement and cost optimisation
Oilfield services market • Key players continue to keep their market positions • Changes in the distribution of regional demand • Constant work to improve efficiency • Increasing use of internal sources of funding
Internal obstacles • Lack of skilled labour • Depreciation of production assets and fixed assets
Macroeconomic factors
• • • • •
Unstable oil prices Retention of the sanctions regime Rise in (foreign) equipment costs Complexities in using and acquiring new technologies and knowledge Difficulties in raising external capital
© 2016 Deloitte & Touche Regional Consulting Services Limited
Source: 2016 Oil and Gas Outlook Survey, company data, Deloitte analysis
Oilfield services market conditions and trends 2016 Segments: drilling, well maintenance and workover, and geophysics
14
Contact information Authors:
Elena Lazko
Steve Openshaw
CIS Oil and Gas Leader
Audit
+7 (495) 787 06 00
[email protected]
+7 (495) 580 96 00
[email protected]
Almaty Anthony Mahon Energy and Resources Leader, Caspian Region +7 (495) 580 96 00
[email protected]
Alexey Nesterenko
Kelly Allin
Senior Manager CIS Oil and Gas
Audit
+7 (495) 787 06 00
[email protected]
+7 (495) 580 96 00
[email protected]
Energy and Resources Leader, West Region +38 (044) 490 90 00
[email protected]
Gennady Kamyshnikov
Andrey Panin
CIS Energy and Resources Leader
Tax and Legal
+7 (495) 787 06 00
[email protected]
Kiev Artur Ohadzhanyan
+7 (495) 787 06 00
[email protected]
Baku Nuran Kerimov Energy and Resources Leader, Azerbaijan +994 (12) 404 12 00
[email protected]
Global Rajeev Chopra Energy and Resources Leader +44 775 78 53 50
[email protected] © 2016 Deloitte & Touche Regional Consulting Services Limited
Oilfield services market conditions and trends 2016 Segments: drilling, well maintenance and workover, and geophysics
15
deloitte.ru About Deloitte Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee, and its network of member firms, including their affiliates (DTTL), each of which is a legally separate and independent entity. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about. for a detailed description of the legal structure of DTTL and its member firms. Deloitte provides audit, consulting, financial advisory, risk management, tax, and other services to public and private clients spanning multiple industries. Deloitte is a globally connected network of member firms across 150 countries and territories that, according to Fortune, counts 400 of the largest 500 companies in the world among its clients. With a globally connected network of member firms in more than 150 countries and territories, Deloitte brings world-class capabilities and high-quality service to clients, delivering the insights they need to address their most complex business challenges. Deloitte's more than 225,000 professionals are committed to becoming the standard of excellence. To learn more about Deloitte, please visit us at:Facebook, LinkedIn or Twitter. This communication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms, or its and their affiliates (the "Deloitte Network"), are, by means of this publication, rendering any professional advice or services. Before taking any decision or action that may impact your situation or financial position, please make sure to consult a professional advisor. No entity in the Deloitte Network shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this publication © 2016 Representative office of Deloitte & Touche Regional Consulting Services Limited. All rights reserved.