Offshore Support Vessels

Offshore Support Vessels Marine Money, 11th Annual Marine Finance Forum, New York, Nov 9th 2010 Geir K. Sandnes, Equity Research, RS Platou Markets ...
Author: Julie Page
1 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Offshore Support Vessels Marine Money, 11th Annual Marine Finance Forum, New York, Nov 9th 2010 Geir K. Sandnes, Equity Research, RS Platou Markets

Contents

FIX 01. Supply & Demand of Offshore Support Vessels

Page 3

02. Current Valuations

17

03. Projected IRRs from investments in OSVs

22

2

Offshore Supply Vessel fleet

Total offshore supply vessel fleet

AHTS

• • • •

PSV

Accumulated

500

50

AHTS

PSV

2013

0

2012

0

2011

0

1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013

0

1000

100

2010

500

50

150

2009

1000

100

1500

200

2008

150

250

2007

1500

200

2000

2006

250

300

2005

2000

2500

350

2004

300

400

2003

2500

350

3000

2002

400

450

2001

3000

2000

450

Total offshore supply vessel fleet

Accumulated

Fleet in operation is 2,385 vessels – 1,385 AHTS and 1,000 PSVs Further 400 vessels under construction – fleet growth of 17% (230 AHTS, 190 PSVs) 275 vessels delivered in 2009 – 180 vessels delivered as of Aug/Sept 2010 Hence, deliveries continue to be pushed to the right – growth will be smoothed

Source: ODS-Petrodata

3

Transition

Idle / laid up vessels

PSV > 4,000 DWT

300

200

350

60

300

50

250

40

200

150

30

150

100

20

100

10

50

50

0 0 April 09

June 09

Nov 09

Jan 10

Mar 10

May 10

PSV > 2,000 DWT

AHTS > 10,000 BHP

PSV < 2,000 DWT

AHTS < 10,000 BHP

• Reduction of idle/laid up vessels only related to PSV < 2,000 DWT • 2/3 of the vessels that constitute the reduction since May are not part of fleet statistics anymore Source: ODS-Petrodata

Aug 10

0

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

# of vessels

250

70

Delivered

Newbuild

Accumulated

• Fleet growth of 320% since 2000 • Further growth of 60% going forward

AHTS > 10,000 BHP

AHTS > 10,000 BHP

AHTS delivery schedule

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

600 500

16 14 12

400

10

300

8

200 100 0

6 4 2 0 SO ND J FM AM J J A SO ND J FMAM J J A SO ND J FMAM J 2011

Delivered

Newbuild

Accumulated

10-15,999 BHP

2012

2013

16,000+ BHP

• Fleet consists of about 530 vessels (excl. AHT) • About 110 vessels under construction • Fleet increase ca 20%

Source: ODS-Petrodata

5

Larger PSVs

PSV > 3,000 DWT

PSV delivery schedule

120

700

14

100

600

12

500

10

400

8

300

6

200

4

100

2

0

0

80 60 40 20 0

SO ND J F M AM J J A SO ND J F M AM J J A SO ND J F M AM J J A 2010

Delivered

Newbuild

Accumulated

2011 500-749m2

2012 750-899m2

2013

900+m2

• Fleet consists of about 660 vessels • About 160 vessels under construction • Fleet increase ca 25%

Source: ODS-Petrodata

6

Time working for vessel owners

Fleet constructed => 1985

Vessels ordered 250

700 600

200 # of vessels

500 400 300 200 100

150 100 50

0 0 2005 AHTS < 10,000 BHP

AHTS > 10,000 BHP

PSV < 3,000 DWT

PSV > 3,000 DWT

2006

2007

PSV > 2,000 DWT

2008

2009

May 2010

2010 YTD

AHTS > 10,000 BHP

Source: ODS-Petrodata

7

Subsea support vessels

DSV fleet - min 50 LOA with DP

ROV fleet - min 50 LOA with DP 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2

Delivered

Newbuild

2013

2011

2009

2007

2005

2003

2001

1999

1997

1995

1993

1991

1989

1987

1985

1983

1981

1979

1977

1975

1973

1971

1969

1967

0

Accumulated

25

250

20

200

15

150

10

100

5

50

0

0

1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013

18

Delivered

Newbuild

Accumulated

• ROVSV fleet growth 19% (down from 25%) • DSV fleet growth 14% (down from 25%)

Source: RS Platou

8

Demand Drillship and semis under construction and accumulated # units

Jack-ups under construction and accumulated # units 80

35

600

350 30

70

30

500

60

30

25

250

40

Units

400

50

300

20

200 14

15

150

27

200

5

Upgrade

Upgrade

2014

2012

2010

2008

2006

2004

2002

2000

1998

1996

1994

1992

1990

1988

1986

1984

1982

1980

1970

2010

2008

2006

2004

2002

2000

1998

1996

1994

1992

1990

1988

1986

1984

1982

1980

1978

1976

1974

1972

0

New Builds

Series2

50

2

0

0

1970

0

100

100

1978

10

10

1976

13 9

1974

20

1972

30

Accumulated # of f loaters

Accumulated # of JU

Source: ODS Petrodata, RS Platou Markets

Source: ODS Petrodata, RS Platou Markets

Historic and forecasted subsea tree awards

FPSO deployments 2000-2013 Planned / Possible

25

Under Construction

800 700

Number of subsea trees

30

20

300

23

Redeployment New deployments

15 10 5 0

600

500 400 300 200 100 0 2005

Source:ODS Petrodata, RS Platou Markets

'06

'07

'08

'09

Actual (Quest Of f shore)

'10E

'11E

'12E

'13E

'14E

Quest f orecast

Source: Quest Offshore Resources

9

UDW - Supply - only 17 units available in 2011 Rig Name

Manager

Rig Type

ENSCO 7500 Pacific Bora Ocean Rig Olympia Pacific Scirocco Songa Eclipse Sedco Energy Deepsea Metro I Pacific Mistral Ocean Endeavor SeaDragon II Noble Amos Runner Maersk Deliverer Ocean Rig Poseidon Stena Tay ENSCO 8504 La Muralla IV Ocean Rig Mykonos Eirik Raude Noble Clyde Boudreaux Deepsea Metro II West Capricorn Stena DrillMAX ICE Stena DrillMAX Deepwater Nautilus

Ensco Pacific Drilling Services Ocean Rig Pacific Drilling Services Songa Offshore Transocean Odfjell Drilling Pacific Drilling Services Diamond Offshore Vantage Drilling Noble Maersk Drilling Ocean Rig Stena Ensco IPC Ocean Rig Ocean Rig Noble Odfjell Drilling Seadrill Stena Stena Transocean

SS DS DS DS SS SS DS DS SS SS SS SS DS SS SS SS DS SS SS DS SS DS DS SS

Rig WD (ft)

Region

8000 10000 10000 10000 7500 7500 10000 10000 8000 10000 8000 10000 10000 8100 8500 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 7500 7500 8000

SE Asia Far East Far East Far East SE Asia W Africa Far East Far East Med/Black Sea SE Asia US GOM W Africa Far East W Africa SE Asia Far East Far East W Africa US GOM Far East SE Asia Far East S America US GOM

Operator

Chevron

Burullus LLOG AGR Total

Tullow Oil Noble Energy

Shell Shell

DP

Free Date

Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N

12.01.2011 29.01.2011 07.04.2011 08.04.2011 07.05.2011 01.06.2011 06.06.2011 07.06.2011 25.06.2011 07.07.2011 15.07.2011 25.07.2011 07.08.2011 31.08.2011 08.09.2011 07.10.2011 07.10.2011 08.10.2011 27.11.2011 06.12.2011 08.12.2011 08.12.2011 31.12.2011 31.12.2011

2010

2011

2012

Rig on contract Mobilization Rig under construction

Source: ODS-Petrodata, RS Platou Markets

• No units available for 2010 following Deepsea Stavanger contract with BP • Only 17 units available in 2011, this is matching demand • Excess supply will quickly become undersupply changing the picture from a ”supply” to a ”demand” driven market pushing the dayrates upwards!

10

Ultra deep water backlog is peaking in 2011/12 Ultra-deepwater backlog by E&P company 500 ExxonMobil

450

Reliance

Annual rig months

400

Anadarko

350

Eni

300

PEMEX

250

Total Chevron

200

BP

150

Shell

100 50 0 2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

Source: ODS-Petrodata, RS Platou Markets

• IOC and NOC’s ultra deepwater backlog peaks in 2011/12 • With continued stable commodity prices, new discoveries and shift from exploration to development drilling we expect them to secure new deepwater capacity during 2011

11

Ultra-deepwater fleet in full utilization and dayrates are bottoming out Semi/drillships (7500ft +) supply demand & utilization 90

110 %

80

100 %

# Units

Supply (LHS)

80 %

Utilization rate (RHS)

70 %

50

60 %

40

50 % 40 %

30

30 %

20

• • • •

500 000 400 000 300 000

Worldwide - Drillship >7500 - Average (US$) Worldwide - Semi >7500 Average (US$)

200 000

20 %

10 0 Jan-00

Utilization rate %

60

600 000

90 %

Demand (LHS)

USD/day

70

700 000

Semi/drillship (7500 ft+) average dayrates

10 % Jun-01 Nov-02 Apr-04 Sep-05 Feb-07

Jul-08

0% Nov-09

100 000 0 Mar-01 Aug-02

Jan-04

Jun-05

Nov-06

Apr-08

Sep-09

Full utilization and no units available for 2010 Utilization will not drop below 95% before Q4/2011 – strong foundation for a rebound in dayrates Latest fixtures indicates a bottoming of dayrates at USD 420K – USD 440 level Several units from the 2011 availability list have secured contracts and 2011 supply/demand is currently in balance

12

Day rates

North Sea PSV spot rates

North Sea AHTS spot rates

45 000

140 000

40 000

120 000

35 000

100 000

30 000 25 000

80 000

20 000

60 000

15 000

40 000

10 000 20 000

5 000 0

0 2000

2001 2002

2003

2004

2005

900+ m2

2006

2007

500-899 m2

2008

2009

2010

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

16000+ BHP

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

10-15999 BHP

Source: RS Platou

13

Term rates – bull sign!

North Sea: PSV term rates

45 000 40 000 35 000 30 000 25 000 20 000 15 000 10 000 5 000 0

30 000 25 000

GBP/day

20 000 15 000 10 000 5 000

8-10,000 BHP

10,001+ BHP

16-19,999 BHP

20,000+ BHP

10-15,999 BHP

2,200 - 3,099 DWT

3,100+ DWT

500-749 m2 deck area

750-899 m2 deck area

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

0 1996

GPB/day

North Sea: AHTS term rates

900+ m2 deck area

Source: RS Platou

14

Second-hand values Second-hand value large AHTS

90 80

70 60 USDm

70 60 50

50

40 30 20

40

10

30

2006

2007

2008

2009

UT 712 / KMAR 404 - built '98

2010

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

UT 712-L/Havyard 842 or similar - built '06-> UT 722-L - built '98 240t BP+/20m beam+ / 500t winch - built 2000->

UT 705 or similar 3,100+ DWT built '90 ->

UT 745 - built '96 ->

MT 6000 - resale

UT 745 or similar 4,000 DWT - built '95 ->

Ulstein P101/UT 776 or similar - Resale

Second hand-value medium-sized PSVs 45 40 35 30

USDm

USDm

Second-hand value large PSVs

80

25 20 15 10 5 2006

Source: RS Platou

2007

2008

UT 706 - built

UT 755-L /VS 470 MKII - resale

15

Contents

FIX 01. Supply & Demand of Offshore Support Vessels

Page 3

02. Current Valuations

17

03. Projected IRRs from investments in OSVs

22

16

Valuation

Company

Last

M.Cap

EV

NAV

P/

USDm

NOK

NAV

EV/EBITDA adj

local

USDm

OSV Deep Sea Supply

11,1

241

687

13

0,9

12,4

5,7

5,4

3,3

2,3

DOF

44,2

688

3 287

76

0,6

10,2

7,9

6,9

3,8

3,5

149,5

1 002

1 872

247

0,6

7,7

6,2

5,8

0,8

56,5

153

725

155

0,4

10,0

6,5

5,6

41,0

143

464

57

0,7

10,6

7,8

106,5

686

2 051

214

0,5

10,9

7,5

0,6

9,7

7,0

Farstad Shipping Havila Shipping Rem Offshore Solstad Offshore Weighted average

2010

2011

Net debt/equity

2012

2010

2011

TP

2012

Rec.

NOK

1,8

Buy

14,6

2,7

Buy

60,0

0,6

0,5

Buy

200,0

1,9

1,8

1,4

Buy

90,0

5,4

1,5

1,8

1,4

Buy

54,0

6,3

1,8

1,7

1,2

Buy

145,0

6,1

2,0

1,8

1,4

Source: RS Platou Markets

• P/NAV rock bottom • EV/EBITDA multiple pricing improves 37% from 2010E to 2012E • Interestingly, shares trade far below book values (”all” asset sales last 10 yrs have resulted in book gain)

17

Norwegian High Yield Market

12

9,8

10

8

USDbn

• This market is a very good proxy for global risk appetite for offshore and shipping assets in the credit markets • Total market size ca USD 13bn + ca USD 4bn in convertible bonds • Oil, Offshore and Shipping account for 82% of volume • Many bonds are secured with either 1st or 2nd lien mortgages • Higher quality names able to fund themselves on an unsecured basis • Global institutional investor base • Activity in 2010 set to reach pre-crisis levels in 2006

5,7

6

4,2 4

3,9

2,8 2 0,9

0,8

0,5 0

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

YTD 2010

Source: RS Platou Markets

18

Norwegian High Yield Market What risks will market buy today?

What risks are harder to finance still?

• Pure asset risk for modern offshore equipment (i.e. without contract) such as ultra deepwater drilling units and jack ups

• Construction risk at unproven yards

• Cash flow and operational risk on old assets

• Pure asset risk on non-generic projects or older units (i.e. without contract)

• Political risk with the right structure • Issue size ranging from USD 50-500m

19

OSV – A unique Norwegian High Yield Market

Supply & Support Total issues of NOK 3bn / USD 500m YTD 2010

900 HAVI03

800

700

DOFSUB 10/14

DOFSUB03

DOF ASA 10/13

SWAP spread (bps)

600

HAVI01

REM02

DOF04 500 SOFF02

400

Farstad 300

DOFSUB01

DOF06

SOFF01 200 SORE01

100

0

0,0

0,5

1,0

1,5

2,0

2,5

3,0

3,5

4,0

4,5

5,0

Time to maturity (yrs)

20

Contents

FIX 01. Supply & Demand of Offshore Support Vessels

Page 3

02. Current Valuations

17

03. Projected IRRs from investments in OSVs

22

21

IRRs from the past • Many projects syndicated in the previous bull cycle from 2005 and onwards • Newbuild prices (ship equipment prices) grew rapidly • Second-hand prices also increased tremendously on the back of a fantastic (North Sea spot) market • Huge credit availability; ~ 80% gearing, NIBOR/LIBOR + ~ 100bps • RS Platou Finans: IRR 17-22% • Pure speculative newbuild placement projects: IRRs of several hundreds of percentages

IRR?

WHAT NOW?

Picture: www.volstad.no

22

Estimated IRR – “Base case” • Order a high-spec PSV of about 4,000 DWT at reputable Asian yard. Secure options! • Excellent cost-benefit ratio (USD/DWT) • Price USD 32m (you cannot get it cheaper than now!) • Day rate assumptions: year 1: low day rate of USD 20,000; year 2-5: USD 30,000 • Further assumptions: 65% loan to construction price; interest rate 5%, vessel value of USD 32m after 5 years in operation, opex per day USD 13,000 (Norwegian crew) • Value assumption reasonable due to history and construction price (Norwegian yard price in the area of USD 43-47m) • All vessel sales (above 80) of Oslo listed OSV companies last 10 years have generated gains. Many sales above or in line with shipbrokers’ valuation. IRR of 22% if vessel value follows 30 years linear depreciation. Residual vessel value of USD 20m required (after 5 years) to obtain IRR of 15%.

IRR 26%

Picture: Geir K. Sandnes

23

Cost benefit ratios

Source: RS Platou

24

Resilience in values – Farstad example

Values peaked summer 2008, bottomed out winter 2010. Average increase in values of Farstad fleet in 2007: 18.1% Average decrease in values of Farstad fleet in 2008: 2.5% Average decrease in values of Farstad fleet in 2009: 15.4% Average increase in values of Farstad fleet in 1H2010: 1.7%

Average values, based upon estimates from 3 shipbrokers per year-end / 1H-end.

Source: Farstad Shipping

25

Long term shareholder value creation DOF share price

Annual return last 10 years:

80

DOF: FAR: SOFF:

60

70

19% 19% 13%

NOK

50 40 30 20 10 0 des. des. des. des. des. des. des. des. des. des. des. des. des. 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

Farstad share price

Solstad share price

180

180

160

160

140

140 120

NOK

100

80 60

100

80 60

40

40

20

20

Source: Bloomberg

feb. 10

feb. 09

feb. 08

feb. 07

feb. 06

feb. 05

feb. 04

feb. 03

feb. 02

feb. 01

feb. 00

feb. 99

feb. 98

feb. 97

feb. 96

feb. 95

feb. 94

feb. 93

feb. 92

feb. 91

0 feb. 90

NOK

120

0 okt. okt. okt. okt. okt. okt. okt. okt. okt. okt. okt. okt. okt. okt. 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10

Farstad NAV

Farstad P/NAV 0,9 0,8 0,7 0,6 0,5 0,4

0,3 0,2 0,1 0

Source: Farstad Shipping

Current IRR - “Special case” • AHTS newbuild Njord Viking awarded a 4 years charter party from ENI Norway for operation in the Barents Sea valued at NOK 425m • Complete support services (incl. ROV) to the MODU Scarabeo 8 • Particulars: de-icing system, latest (Norwegian) oil recovery rules (NOFO 2009), ROV hangar and launching system • Assumptions: construction cost NOK 425m, 70% mortgage financing, 5% interest rate, linear depreciation profile based upon 30 years life time of the vessel

IRR 21% IRR of 26 % if vessel value keeps up during charter period. Residual vessel value of NOK 320m required (after 4 years) to obtain IRR of 15%.

Picture: www.vikingsupply.com

28

HSE in focus

• • • • • •

“Far Star”, delivered 1999 Length 84 meter Fuel cons. 12 knot – 16 t/d (3.6 kg/DWT) Fuel cons. DP2 – 10 t/d No exhaust gas cleaning Direct mechanical propulsion, all engines normally engaged and running • Fuel tanks against outer hull

• • • • • •

UT 751 CD, delivered 2009 Length 94 meter Fuel cons. 12 knot – 10 t/d (1.8 kg/DWT) Fuel cons. DP2 – 6 t/d Cathalytic cleaners remove min 95% Nox Diesel electric power plant. Only min. number of generator sets running at any one time. • Clean design class. • Additional “environmental” investments NOK 40m

• Higher construction costs • Offset by daily fuel savings of approx. NOK 25,000

Source: Farstad / RS Platou

29

Conclusion • Construction prices at bottom – will not get any cheaper!

• Second-hand prices have come down significantly, however turned up somewhat

• P/NAV 0.6

• Market: short term challenges, very promising long term outlook

• 20-25% of fleet approaching 30 years within the next 5 years

• Newbuild placements at very low levels

Shares up 30-50% 30

Appendices

Deep Sea Supply – BUY – TP USD 2.5 Share price in Deep Sea Supply relative to key indices 13

Description of business Deep Sea Supply controls a fleet of 29 offshore service vessels whereas 6 of the vessels are under construction.

12 11

10 9

Market view The large order book of offshore support vessels as the financial turmoil hit the world, and the subsequent lower demand with high influx of vessels to the market put pressure on vessel rates and utilization. The last months the market has improved. Spot rates in the North Sea spot market, being the predominant yardstick for the state of the high-end vessel market, has improved significantly. For the first time since the financial turmoil we also see increasing asset prices. The market improvement is likely to continue into 2011. Valuation 2011 EV/EBITDA 5.7 Investment thesis Market improvement implies repricing momentum for a geared and spot exposed company like Deep Sea Supply Risks Oil price Vessel ordering

8 7 nov. 09

f eb. 10

mai. 10

Deep Sea Supply

aug. 10

OSE Benchm ark Index (Rebased) OSE Energy (Rebased)

C o mp any d at a ( 2 0 10 E) Share price (NOK) No. of shares (m) M arket cap. (USDm) Net debt YE (USDm) Enterprise value (USDm)

Ke y f igure s To tal revenue (USDm) EBITDA (USDm) EBITDA , adj. (USDm) EBIT, adj. (USDm) P re-tax pro fit, adj. (USDm) Net inco me, adj. (USDm) EPS, adj. (USD) OCFP S (USD) FCFP S (USD) B VPS (USD) Net asset value (NA V) (USD) Dividend (USD) EV/EBITDA , adj. (x) EV/EBIT, adj. (x) P /E, adj. (x) P /OCF (x) EV/FCF (x) P /B o o k (x) P /NA V (x) Dividend yield (%)

11,10 126,9 241 533 687

2006 87 55 42 32 27 26 0,25 0,4 -1,2 2,7

2007 148 102 101 84 67 54 0,43 0,5 -0,7 1,3

2008 220 152 122 92 53 56 0,44 1,0 0,4 0,9

2009 176 103 94 57 30 38 0,30 0,7 0,2 1,3

0,13 10,2 13,4 12,3 6,9 n.m. 1,1

1,71 8,7 10,4 10,5 8,2 n.m. 3,5

0,32 4,4 5,8 2,3 1,0 10,5 1,1

0,00 6,4 10,5 4,5 1,9 20,6 1,1

4,2

38,2

32,1

0,0

2 0 10 E 144 61 55 20 -9 -9 -0,07 0,2 -0,4 1,3 2,2 0,00 12,4 34,3 n.m. 8,7 n.m. 1,5 0,9 0,0

2 0 11E 218 126 120 86 55 54 0,43 0,7 0,2 1,7

2 0 12 E 227 126 120 86 53 52 0,41 0,7 0,2 2,2

0,00 5,7 7,9 4,5 2,8 26,7 1,1

0,00 5,6 7,8 4,6 2,7 25,3 0,9

0,0

0,0

32

Time to buy tonnage! OSQ 1Q OSQ 2Q OSQ 3Q

33

DOF – BUY – TP NOK 60 Share price in DOF relative to key indices

Description of business

48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30

DOF controls a fleet of 67 offshore vessels including newbuilds. With 23 different subsea vessels the group owns one of the largest fleet within the area. Market view The large order book of offshore support vessels as the financial turmoil hit the world, and the subsequent lower demand with high influx of vessels to the market put pressure on vessel rates and utilization. The last months the market has improved. Spot rates in the North Sea spot market, being the predominant yardstick for the state of the high-end vessel market, has improved significantly. For the first time since the financial turmoil we also see increasing asset prices. The market improvement is likely to continue into 2011. Valuation NAV of NOK 76 Investment thesis Market improvement implies repricing momentum for a geared company like DOF. Furthermore, vessel import possibilities to Brazil give resilience to values. Risks Oil price Vessel ordering

nov. 09

f eb. 10

DOF

mai. 10

aug. 10

OSE Benchm ark Index (Rebased) OSE Energy (Rebased)

C o mp any d at a ( 2 0 10 E) Share price (NOK) No. of shares (m) M arket cap. (NOKm) Net debt YE (NOKm) Enterprise value (NOKm)

Ke y f igure s To tal revenue (NOKm) EBITDA (NOKm) EBITDA , adj. (NOKm) EBIT, adj. (NOKm) P re-tax pro fit, adj. (NOKm) Net inco me, adj. (NOKm) EPS, adj. (NOK) OCFP S (NOK) FCFP S (NOK) B VPS (NOK) Net asset value (NA V) (NOK) Dividend (NOK) EV/EBITDA , adj. (x) EV/EBIT, adj. (x) P /E, adj. (x) P /OCF (x) EV/FCF (x) P /B o o k (x) P /NA V (x) Dividend yield (%)

44,20 91,0 4 024 15 171 19 195

2006 3 011 1292 1078 661 485 547 6,61 8,7 -13,7 39,8 70,4 1,50 8,2 13,3 10,3 7,8 n.m. 1,7 1,0 2,2

2007 3 454 1229 1060 531 181 -52 -0,62 9,1 -47,0 55,0 93,0 0,00 10,5 21,1 n.m. 6,8 n.m. 1,1 0,7 0,0

2008 4 340 1556 1186 542 -21 405 4,90 8,7 -11,2 66,4 98,0 0,00 10,1 22,2 6,9 3,9 n.m. 0,5 0,3 0,0

2009 4 327 1234 1165 328 117 13 0,14 6,6 -29,3 74,8 81,0 0,00 12,2 43,3 n.m. 5,9 n.m. 0,5 0,5 0,0

2 0 10 E 5 439 1880 1880 756 328 335 3,68 20,1 -36,5 73,9 75,8 0,00 10,2 25,4 12,0 2,2 n.m. 0,6 0,6 0,0

2 0 11E 6 357 2 651 2 651 1402 1024 819 9,00 21,7 -18,7 81,8

2 0 12 E 6 802 2 890 2 890 1607 1241 993 10,90 24,9 12,4 91,3

0,00 7,9 15,0 4,9 2,0 n.m. 0,5

0,00 6,9 12,4 4,1 1,8 17,7 0,5

0,0

0,0

34

Farstad Shipping – BUY – TP NOK 200 Share price in Farstad Shipping relative to key indices 165 160 155 150 145 140 135 130 125 120

Description of business Major global player within the market for high-end offshore supply vessels. Farstad has a fleet of 58 vessels, however no vessels under construction. Market view The large order book of offshore support vessels as the financial turmoil hit the world, and the subsequent lower demand with high influx of vessels to the market put pressure on vessel rates and utilization. The last months the market has improved. Spot rates in the North Sea spot market, being the predominant yardstick for the state of the high-end vessel market, has improved significantly. For the first time since the financial turmoil we also see increasing asset prices. The market improvement is likely to continue into 2011. Valuation NAV of NOK 258 Investment thesis Cheap on NAV, cheap on EV/EBITDA, cheap on cash flow. FCF per share of NOK 54 in 2011E and 2012E. Liquid assets of about NOK 2 bn. Risks Oil price Vessel ordering

nov. 09

f eb. 10

mai. 10

aug. 10

Farstad Shipping

OSE Benchm ark Index (Rebased) OSE Energy (Rebased)

C o mp any d at a ( 2 0 10 E) Share price (NOK) No. of shares (m) M arket cap. (NOKm) Net debt YE (NOKm) Enterprise value (NOKm)

Ke y f igure s To tal revenue (NOKm) EBITDA (NOKm) EBITDA , adj. (NOKm) EBIT, adj. (NOKm) P re-tax pro fit, adj. (NOKm) Net inco me, adj. (NOKm) EPS, adj. (NOK) OCFP S (NOK) FCFP S (NOK) B VPS (NOK) Net asset value (NA V) (NOK) Dividend (NOK) EV/EBITDA , adj. (x) EV/EBIT, adj. (x) P /E, adj. (x) P /OCF (x) EV/FCF (x) P /B o o k (x) P /NA V (x) Dividend yield (%)

149,50 39,0 5 831 5 081 10 911

2006 1941 987 978 692 521 498 12,77 19,5 -8,4 90,6 170,9 3,00 8,6 12,2 10,6 6,9 n.m. 1,5 0,8 2,2

2007 2 514 1377 1155 819 639 -154 -3,95 3,2 -15,0 88,0 218,1 4,00 7,6 10,8 n.m. 46,5 n.m. 1,7 0,7 2,7

2008 3 020 1729 1653 1287 1066 1458 37,39 31,6 -1,9 113,8 248,1 5,00 3,7 4,8 1,8 2,1 n.m. 0,6 0,3 7,4

2009 3 258 1736 1716 1261 1035 1563 40,08 29,2 -35,3 160,3 249,5 3,00 5,6 7,6 3,2 4,4 n.m. 0,8 0,5 2,3

2 0 10 E 3 232 1444 1422 900 547 528 13,54 30,4 2,7 167,6 246,7 4,00 7,7 12,1 11,0 4,9 n.m. 0,9 0,6 2,7

2 0 11E 3 455 1637 1618 1076 705 688 17,65 31,6 27,2 180,7

2 0 12 E 3 456 1588 1568 1015 669 655 16,81 31,0 26,6 192,0

5,00 6,2 9,3 8,5 4,7 9,5 0,8

5,00 5,9 9,1 8,9 4,8 8,9 0,8

3,3

3,3

35

Havila Shipping – BUY – TP NOK 90 Description of business

Share price in Havila Shipping relative to key indices 75

Havila Shipping controls a fleet of 24 PSVs, AHTS vessels, subsea support vessels and rescue recovery vessels. 3 of the vessels are under construction.

70

65 60 55

Market view The large order book of offshore support vessels as the financial turmoil hit the world, and the subsequent lower demand with high influx of vessels to the market put pressure on vessel rates and utilization. The last months the market has improved. Spot rates in the North Sea spot market, being the predominant yardstick for the state of the high-end vessel market, has improved significantly. For the first time since the financial turmoil we also see increasing asset prices. The market improvement is likely to continue into 2011.

Valuation 2011 EV/EBITDA 6.5 NAV equals NOK 154 per share Investment thesis Huge discrepancy between asset values and pricing. Above 80% of asset values relates to vessel built/tbd 2008-2011, whereas new and modern assets historically have showed high value resilience. Risks Oil price Vessel ordering

50 45 40 nov. 09

f eb. 10

mai. 10

Havila Shipping

aug. 10

OSE Benchm ark Index (Rebased) OSE Energy (Rebased)

C o mp any d at a ( 2 0 10 E) Share price (NOK) No. of shares (m) M arket cap. (NOKm) Net debt YE (NOKm) Enterprise value (NOKm)

Ke y f igure s To tal revenue (NOKm) EBITDA (NOKm) EBITDA , adj. (NOKm) EBIT, adj. (NOKm) P re-tax pro fit, adj. (NOKm) Net inco me, adj. (NOKm) EPS, adj. (NOK) OCFP S (NOK) FCFP S (NOK) B VPS (NOK) Net asset value (NA V) (NOK) Dividend (NOK) EV/EBITDA , adj. (x) EV/EBIT, adj. (x) P /E, adj. (x) P /OCF (x) EV/FCF (x) P /B o o k (x) P /NA V (x) Dividend yield (%)

56,50 15,8 893 3 337 4 230

2006 721 457 403 309 275 223 14,50 21,3 -10,0 64,6

2007 675 478 331 250 162 56 3,49 28,1 -30,7 67,8

2008 1122 740 428 330 208 245 16,38 14,3 5,4 75,4

2009 901 454 448 315 195 186 12,19 23,4 -84,8 111,5

2,00 5,5 7,2 5,8 3,9 n.m. 1,3

3,50 10,5 13,9 34,1 4,2 n.m. 1,8

16,50 5,8 7,5 2,1 2,4 30,6 0,5

0,00 8,8 12,5 4,9 2,5 n.m. 0,5

2,4

2,9

47,8

0,0

2 0 10 E 1249 579 424 244 19 -41 -2,57 23,2 -33,7 111,7 155,0 0,00 10,0 17,3 n.m. 2,4 n.m. 0,5 0,4 0,0

2 0 11E 1559 713 713 500 302 283 17,88 23,8 -28,1 129,5

2 0 12 E 1604 733 733 514 325 304 19,25 32,1 32,1 148,8

0,00 6,5 9,3 3,2 2,4 n.m. 0,4

0,00 5,6 8,0 2,9 1,8 8,2 0,4

0,0

0,0

36

Rem Offshore – BUY – TP NOK 54 Description of business

Share price in Rem Offshore relative to key indices 50

Rem Offshore controls a fleet of 14 offshore vessels, whereas 13 are majority owned and one is minority owned. 5 vessels are under construction with delivery 2011/12.

45 40

35

Market view The large order book of offshore support vessels as the financial turmoil hit the world, and the subsequent lower demand with high influx of vessels to the market put pressure on vessel rates and utilization. The last months the market has improved. Spot rates in the North Sea spot market, being the predominant yardstick for the state of the high-end vessel market, has improved significantly. For the first time since the financial turmoil we also see increasing asset prices. The market improvement is likely to continue into 2011. Valuation 2012 EV/EBITDA 5.4 Investment thesis Brand new fleet – oldest vessel from 2007 Cash flow and NAV corresponds Best business sense Risks Huge new building activity Further drop in term rates and asset values

30 25 20 nov. 09

f eb. 10

mai. 10

aug. 10

Rem Offshore

nov. 10

OSE Benchm ark Index (Rebased) OSE Energy (Rebased)

C o mp any d at a ( 2 0 10 E) Share price (NOK) No. of shares (m) M arket cap. (NOKm) Net debt YE (NOKm) Enterprise value (NOKm)

Ke y f igure s To tal revenue (NOKm) EBITDA (NOKm) EBITDA , adj. (NOKm) EBIT, adj. (NOKm) P re-tax pro fit, adj. (NOKm) Net inco me, adj. (NOKm) EPS, adj. (NOK) OCFP S (NOK) FCFP S (NOK) B VPS (NOK) Net asset value (NA V) (NOK) Dividend (NOK) EV/EBITDA , adj. (x) EV/EBIT, adj. (x) P /E, adj. (x) P /OCF (x) EV/FCF (x) P /B o o k (x) P /NA V (x) Dividend yield (%)

41,00 20,3 833 1 878 2 711

2006 190 116 116 112 90 91 6,62 5,4 -52,9 62,6

2007 532 349 286 275 213 175 4,61 3,8 -28,2 34,6

2008 779 487 437 401 268 275 6,96 5,7 -23,9 38,7

2009 804 574 305 267 203 204 6,82 8,5 21,9 40,3

0,00

0,00 12,5 13,1 11,4 14,0 n.m. 1,5

1,50 10,6 11,5 8,0 9,8 n.m. 1,4

5,00 5,7 6,5 5,9 4,7 2,7 1,0

0,0

2,7

12,5

2 0 10 E 465 255 255 201 112 113 5,57 7,7 -65,9 66,7 57,0 1,50 10,6 13,5 7,4 5,4 n.m. 0,6 0,7 3,7

2 0 11E 722 432 432 358 224 221 10,88 12,4 -39,7 84,5 68,0 1,50 7,8 9,4 3,8 3,3 n.m. 0,5 0,6 3,7

2 0 12 E 982 599 599 508 344 339 16,69 19,8 5,0 102,9 1,50 5,4 6,4 2,5 2,1 31,6 0,4 3,7

37

Solstad Offshore – BUY – TP NOK 145 Share price in Solstad Offshore relative to key indices 130

Description of business Total fleet of 50 vessels, including the JV Nor Offshore in Asia. 4 vessels under construction. Especially strong position within (ultra)large AHTS and construction vessels.

125

120 115 110

Market view

105

The large order book of offshore support vessels as the financial turmoil hit the world, and the subsequent lower demand with high influx of vessels to the market put pressure on vessel rates and utilization. The last months the market has improved. Spot rates in the North Sea spot market, being the predominant yardstick for the state of the high-end vessel market, has improved significantly. For the first time since the financial turmoil we also see increasing asset prices. The market improvement is likely to continue into 2011.

100

Valuation NAV of NOK 214 Investment thesis Very attractive high-end / deepwater fleet at a discount Risks Oil price Vessel ordering

95 nov. 09

f eb. 10

mai. 10

Solstad Offshore

aug. 10

OSE Benchm ark Index (Rebased) OSE Energy (Rebased)

C o mp any d at a ( 2 0 10 E) Share price (NOK) No. of shares (m) M arket cap. (NOKm) Net debt YE (NOKm) Enterprise value (NOKm)

Ke y f igure s To tal revenue (NOKm) EBITDA (NOKm) EBITDA , adj. (NOKm) EBIT, adj. (NOKm) P re-tax pro fit, adj. (NOKm) Net inco me, adj. (NOKm) EPS, adj. (NOK) OCFP S (NOK) FCFP S (NOK) B VPS (NOK) Net asset value (NA V) (NOK) Dividend (NOK) EV/EBITDA , adj. (x) EV/EBIT, adj. (x) P /E, adj. (x) P /OCF (x) EV/FCF (x) P /B o o k (x) P /NA V (x) Dividend yield (%)

106,50 37,8 4 025 7 970 11 994

2006 1883 1025 929 592 473 520 13,75 31,4 2,9 84,0 156,0 4,00 8,0 12,5 10,0 4,4 67,6 1,6 0,9 2,9

2007 2 219 1386 1275 838 697 383 10,12 26,4 -38,0 98,4 227,0 4,00 6,8 10,4 15,3 5,9 n.m. 1,6 0,7 2,6

2008 2 209 1277 1203 682 320 584 15,45 27,6 -4,6 97,8 232,0 2,00 5,0 8,7 3,8 2,1 n.m. 0,6 0,3 3,4

2009 2 529 1160 1149 500 243 415 10,99 35,6 15,6 122,5 227,0 2,50 8,4 19,2 9,8 3,0 16,3 0,9 0,5 2,3

2 0 10 E 2 658 1105 1105 505 111 38 1,01 11,1 -64,0 118,8 214,0 2,50 10,9 23,7 n.m. 9,6 n.m. 0,9 0,5 2,3

2 0 11E 3 310 1630 1630 972 620 639 16,90 30,6 -10,0 135,3

2 0 12 E 3 536 1761 1761 1103 739 746 19,75 34,3 31,4 154,2

3,00 7,5 12,7 6,3 3,5 n.m. 0,8

4,00 6,3 10,0 5,4 3,1 9,3 0,7

2,8

3,8

38

UT 755 – most popular offshore supply vessel design First vessel delivered 1996 – construction price NOK 95-100m Although the design is now 14 years old it has continually evolved to incorporate all the latest technological solutions - Prolonged from 67m to 73m (UT 755L) - Bulb (UT 755 LN) - DP - Methanol tanks - FiFi

Northern Supporter (prev. Suffolk Supporter) – UT 755 - built 1996

Rem Star – UT 755 LN – delivered June 2009

Dec 2004: Rem Supplier ordered – delivered 2006 – cost NOK 120-125m Construction prices peaked 2008 around NOK 200-220m Construction price believed to be around NOK 190-200m today Rem Server (UT 755 LN) sold October 2008 (del. 1Q09) for NOK 243,5m Market value today: about NOK 170m

Disclaimer •

This report is prepared by RS Platou Markets AS (“Platou”). Platou’s business in general, as well as the reports it prepares, is subject to supervision by the Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority (“Finanstilsynet”). Platou aims always to operate in compliance with appropriate business principles, including Business Standard No. 3 of 6 September 2005 of the Norwegian Securities Dealers Association, regarding handling of conflicts of interests and the content of reports produced by investment companies and other relevant standards. This report has been prepared by Platou’s research department, which is separated from the corporate finance department in order to control the flow of information (“Chinese walls”). The analyst(s) involved in the preparation of this report has not at the same time been involved in corporate assignments for companies described by him or her. All employees of Platou are subject to duty of confidentiality towards clients and with respect to handling of inside information.



This report is based on publicly available information only and all information, including statements of fact, contained in this report has been obtained and compiled in good faith from sources believed to be reliable. However, no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made by Platou with respect to the completeness or accuracy of its contents, and it is not to be relied upon as authoritative and should not be regarded as a substitute for the exercise of a reasoned and independent judgement by you. Platou accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from the use of this report or its content. There are always financial risks related to investment activities, such as the risk of no yield or the risk of losing the capital invested. Past performance does not indicate nor guarantee future performance of an investment. Some investments discussed by Platou have high volatility and may therefore experience sudden and large changes in value that may cause losses. It should further be noted that international investing includes risks related to political and economic uncertainties as well as currency risk. Jurisdiction, reproduction etc. This report is governed by and to be construed solely in accordance with Norwegian law. It may not be reproduced, redistributed or republished by any recipient for any purpose or to any person. If you are not a client of Platou, you are not entitled to receive this research report.



• •

United States • This report or copies of it must not be distributed in the United States or to recipients who are citizens of the United States against restrictions stated in the United States legislation. Distributing the report in the United States might be seen as a breach of these laws. Canada • The information provided in this publication is not intended to be distributed or circulated in any manner in Canada and therefore should not be construed as any kind of financial recommendation or advice provided within the meaning of Canadian securities laws. Other countries • Laws and regulations of other countries may also restrict the distribution of this report.

40

Suggest Documents