OF ESOMEPRAZOLE MAGNESIUM AND DOMPERIDONE IN A TABLET DOSAGE FORM

Bulletin of Pharmaceutical Research 2012;2(3):134-9 An Official Publication of Association of Pharmacy Professionals ISSN: 2249-6041 (Print); ISSN: 22...
Author: Victor Douglas
12 downloads 0 Views 342KB Size
Bulletin of Pharmaceutical Research 2012;2(3):134-9 An Official Publication of Association of Pharmacy Professionals ISSN: 2249-6041 (Print); ISSN: 2249-9245 (Online)

RESEARCH ARTICLE

RP-HPLC METHOD FOR SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION OF ESOMEPRAZOLE MAGNESIUM AND DOMPERIDONE IN A TABLET DOSAGE FORM Nilesh Jain1*, Ruchi Jain1, Deepak KumarJain2 and Surendra Kumar Jain1 1

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Sagar Institute of Research and Technology-Pharmacy, Ayodya Bypass Road, Bhopal-462041, Madhya Pradesh, India 2 Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Truba Institute of Pharmacy, Karond Gandhi Nagar Bypass Road, Bhopal-462036, Madhya Pradesh, India *E-mails: [email protected], [email protected] Tel.: +91 9425074520. Received: May 21, 2012 / Revised: October 05, 2012 / Accepted: October 06, 2012

A simple, sensitive and validated isocratic reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC) method has been developed for the simultaneous determination of esomeprazole and domperidone in tablet dosage form. The chromatographic separation was achieved on a hyperchrome C-18 (4.6´150 mm, 5µ particle size) analytical column using a mixture of acetonitrile: phosphate buffer (pH 5.0) in the ratio of 60:40 (v/v) used as the mobile phase, at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min and detector wavelength at 290 nm. The validation of the proposed method was carried out for specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, limit of detection, limit of quantitation and robustness. Linearity of method was found to be in concentration range 10-50 µg/ml for esomeprazole and 5-25 µg/ml for domperidone with correlation coefficient greater than 0.9999. The retention time of domperidone and esomeprazole was found to be 2.92 and 3.91 min respectively. The method is suitable for the estimation of both the components simultaneously in pharmaceutical tablet formulations. Key words: Esomeprazole, Domperidone, RP-HPLC, Validation, Simultaneous estimation. INTRODUCTION Domperidone (DOM), which is chemically 5-chloro-1-[1-[3-(2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzimidazol-1-yl)propyl]piperidin-4-yl]-1, 3-dihydro2H-benzimidazol-2-one (Figure 1), is used as an anti-emetic and to suppress nausea and vomiting.

disorders caused by chronic and sub-acute gastritis. It is a gastrointestinal emptying (delayed) adjuvant, a peristaltic stimulant and exhibits anti-emetic properties. It can be used in patients with Parkinson’s disease (Shindler et al 1984) and also found to be effective in the treatment of gastroparesis (Silvers et al 1998). It is official in BP which recommends non-aqueous titration with perchloric acid as titrant and naphthol benzein as indicator (British Pharmacopoeia, 2009). Several chromatographic methods have been reported for determination of Domperidone in pharmaceutical dosage form by differential pulse voltammetry (El-Shahawi et al 2007), planar chromatography (Gosavi et al 2006), high-performance liquid chromatography

H N

O

Cl

H N

N O

N

N

Fig. 1. Chemical structure of Domperidone DOM is indicated for treating symptoms associated with upper gastrointestinal motility

134

ã

Jain et al

Bull. Pharm. Res. 2012;2(3)

(Patel et al 2009; 2007; Thanikachalam et al 2008, Singh et al 2010), high-performance thinlayer chromatography (Patel et al 2008; Yadav et al 2009; Pawar et al 2010), UVspectrophotometry (Kapil et al 2009; Rajendra Prasad et al 2009; Patel et al 2010; Zenita Devi et al 2012). For the determination of DOM in biological samples like human, dog and rat plasma, several chromatographic techniques such as liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (Li et al 2009; Bose et al 2009), ultra performance liquid chromatography (Xu et al 2008) and high-performance liquid chromatography (Sivakumar et al 2008) have been reported. Esomeprazole magnesium trihydrate (Andersson et al 2001) (ESO) is chemically bis (5-methoxy-2-[(S)-[(4-methoxy-3, 5-dimethyl-2-pyridinyl) methyl] sulfinyl]-1Hbenzimidazol-1-yl) magnesium trihydrate, (Figure 2) a compound that inhibits gastric acid secretion. Esomeprazole is cost effective in the treatment of gastric oesophageal reflux diseases.

EXPERIMENTAL Chemicals and Reagents Analytically pure sample of ESO was a generous gift from Glenmark Pharma Ltd., Baddi, and DOM was an obtained from Aurbindo Pharma Ltd, Hyderabad. Potassium dihydrogen phosphate, disodium hydrogen phosphate and acetonitrile (HPLC Grade) were purchased from E. Merck Ltd, Mumbai, India. The 0.45 µm nylon filters were purchased from Advanced Micro Devices Pvt. Ltd. Chandigad, India. Triple distilled water was used throughout the experiment. Commercial tablets of ESO and DOM, Ranidom-O (Mankind Pharma) was procured from the local drug market. Instrumentation Liquid chromatographic system from Young Lin 9100 comprising of manual injector, YL 9111 quaternary pump for constant flow and constant pressure delivery and photodiode array detector YL 9160 detector connected to software YL clarity for controlling the instrumentation as well as processing the data generated was used. Weighing was done on Digital Micro Balance (CX-265) Citizen Scale (I) Pvt. Limited and pH of buffer was maintained by using Systronics pH meter.

OCH3 H3C

CH3 O

H N

S

OCH3

Mg2+. 3H2O

N N H

Fig. 2. Chemical structure of esomeprazole magnesium trihydrate

Chromatographic conditions The isocratic mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile: phosphate buffer (pH-5.0) in the ratio of 60:40 v/v, flowing through the column at a constant flow rate of 1 ml/min. A hyperchrome C-18 column (4.6 ´ 250 mm, 5 µ particle size) was used as the stationary phase. By considering the chromatographic parameter, sensitivity and selectivity of method for two drugs, 290 nm was selected as the detection wavelength for UV-PDA detector. The HPLC system was operated at room temperature 25°C.

Esomeprazole is the S-isomer of omeprazole, the first single optical isomer proton pump inhibitor, generally provides better acid control than current racemic proton pump inhibitors and has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile relative to omeprazole (Scott et al 2002). Several methods have been employed for the estimation of esomeprazole alone and combination with other drugs such as UV and RP-HPLC method (Hultman et al 2007; Magesh et al 2010; Lakshmana Prabu et al 2008; Zanitti et al 2010; Jain et al 2011). Keeping in view the importance of RP-HPLC method for estimation of drugs (Prasanthi et al 2011; Bhimavarapu et al 2011; Basaveswara Rao et al 2012a; 2012b), the present work was directed toward the development of a new, rapid and sensitive RPHPLC method for the simultaneous determination of ESO and DOM in tablet dosage form. To access the reproducibility and wide applicability of the developed method, it was validated as per ICH guidelines (Code Q2A, Code Q2B) which are mandatory also.

Standard preparation Standard stock solution Standard stock solutions were prepared by dissolving separately 100 mg of each drug in 100 ml of diluent which was a mixture of acetonitrile and phosphate buffer in the ratio of 60:40 (pH 5.0) to get concentration of 1000 µg/ ml. Working standard solution Working standard solutions were prepared by taking dilutions ranging from 10-50, 5-25 µg/ml for ESO and DOM respectively.

135

Jain et al

Bull. Pharm. Res. 2012;2(3)

Sample preparation The commercial formulations of DOM and ESO (Ranidom-O tab) were selected for analysis. Twenty tablets were weighed and powdered separately. Weight equivalent to 10 mg DOM and 20 mg ESO was dissolved in 100 ml diluents and then sonicated for 15 min and filtered through whatmann paper no. 41. Different concentration of solution were prepared by serial dilution technique, as per standard and each dilution was analyzed.

experimental conditions, sharp peaks that belong to DOM and ESO were obtained at retention times of 2.92 and 3.91 min respectively as shown in Figure 2.

Method validation The developed chromatographic method was validated using ICH guidelines. Validation parameters performed include linearity, limit of detection and quantitation, selectivity, robustness, accuracy and repeatability as per ICH guidelines. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In the present work, conditions were optimized for the development and validation of a simple and accurate HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of DOM and ESO in tablet dosage form. The most appropriate mobile phase composition was found to be mixture of acetonitrile: phosphate buffer (pH 5.0) in the ratio of 60 : 40 (v/v). Under the described

Fig. 2. Chromatogram for the analysis of DOM and ESO System suitability System suitability parameters such as number of theoretical plates, HETP and peak tailing were determined. The results obtained are shown in Table 1. The number of theoretical plates for ESO and DOM were 4218 and 2718 respectively.

Table 1. System suitability parameters Parameter* Retention time No. of theoretical plate Tailing factor HETP Calibration range

ESO 3.91±0.0063 4218±2.756 1.26±0.012 0.059±3.87

DOM 2.92±0.0064 2718±1.549 1.43±0.013 0.091±5.24

10-50 mg/ml

5-25 mg/ml

*Each value is the Mean±SD of six determinations

Linearity The calibration curve was linear over the concentration range of 5-25 µg/ml and 10-50 µg/ml for DOM and ESO respectively. The correlation coefficients in both cases were found to be greater than 0.9999 which manifested a linear relationship between concentration and the peak area. The linearity was represented by a linear regression equation as follows.

Accuracy Method accuracy was performed by adding known amounts of DOM and ESO to the preanalyzed solution and then comparing the added concentrations with the found concentrations. Three levels of solutions were made which corresponded to 80, 100 and 120% of the nominal analytical concentration (10 µg/ml for ESO and 5 µg/ml for DOM). Each level was made in triplicate (Table 2). The mean percentage recoveries obtained for Domperidone and Esomeprazole magnesium trihydrate were 96.26 and 99.38% respectively and RSD was less than 2.

(ESO) Y = 30.098 X + 1.876 with correlation coefficient equal to 0.999. (DOM) Y = 20.79 X + 1.02 with correlation coefficient equal to 0.9999.

136

Jain et al

Bull. Pharm. Res. 2012;2(3) Table 2. Results of recovery studies

S. No. 1 2 3

Conc. of drug in preanalyzed samples (mg/ml) ESO DOM 10 5 10 5 10 5

Standard drug solution added (mg/ml) ESO DOM 8 4 10 5 12 6 Mean SD %RSD

Recovered amount* (mg/ml) ESO 7.94 9.79 11.86

DOM 3.79 4.86 5.72

% Recovered ESO 99.25 97.9 98.83 98.66 0.062 0.33

DOM 94.75 97.20 95.33 95.76 0.063 0.77

*Mean of nine determinations (3 replicates at 3 concentration level)

Repeatability Five dilutions in three replicates were analyzed in same day for repeatability and results were found within acceptable limits (RSD < 2) as shown in Table 3.

by altering the pH or concentration of the mobile phase were made to check the method’s capacity to remain unaffected. The change was made in the ratio of mobile phase, instead of acetonitrile:phosphate buffer (pH 5.0) (60:40 v/v), acetonitrile: phosphate buffer (pH 5.0) (55:45 v/v), was used as a mobile phase. Results of analysis were summarized in Table 3.

Intermediate precision Five dilutions in three replicates were analyzed on two different days and by two analysts for day to day and analyst to analyst variation and results were found within acceptable limits (RSD < 2) as shown in Table 3.

Tablet analysis The concentration of ESO and DOM in the tablet formulation was found to be 99.37 and 98.97% respectively. The low values of % coefficient of variation indicated that the method was precise and accurate (Table 4).

Robustness As per ICH norms, small, but deliberate variation

Table 3. Results of precision studies Validation Parameter Repeatability Intermediate precision Day to Day Analyst to Analyst Robustness

Percentage Mean±SD* (n=15) ESO DOM 99.68±0.11 98.83±0.06

Percentage RSD* ESO DOM 0.47 0.54

99.92±0.11 99.93±0.13 99.67±0.07

0.47 0.57 0.36

98.80±0.05 98.85±0.05 99.02±0.04

0.61 0.61 0.32

*Mean of thirty determinations (3 replicates at 5 concentration level)

Table 4. Result of tablet analysis S. No. 1 2

Drug ESO DOM

Mean* 99.37 98.97

SD* 0.0427 0.0514

% COV* 0.2300 0.4183

Standard error 0.0154 0.0184

*Mean of nine determinations (3 replicates at 3 concentration level)

CONCLUSION A simple, precise, reliable, rapid, sensitive and accurate reverse phase HPLC method has been developed for the simultaneous determination of

esomeprazole and domperidone. The developed method is suitable for the identification and quantification of binary combination of esomeprazole and domperidone.

137

Jain et al

Bull. Pharm. Res. 2012;2(3)

A high percentage of recovery and the run time of less than five min allowed its application for the routine determination of esomeprazole and domperidone in the pharmaceutical formulations.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors are thankful to Glenmark Pharma Ltd, Baddi and Aurbindo Pharma Ltd, Hyderabad for providing gift samples along with their analytical reports.

REFERENCES

Andersson T, Hassan-Alin M, Hasselgren G, Rohss K, Weidolf L. Pharmacokinetic studies with esomeprazole, the (S)-isomer of omeprazole. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2001; 40(6):411-26. Basaveswara Rao MV, Nagendrakumar AVD, Sivanadh M, Venkata Rao G. Validated RP-HPLC method for the estimation of telmisartan in tablet formulation. Bull. Pharm. Res. 2012;2(2):50-5. Basaveswara Rao MV, Prasanthi V, Sivanadh M, Venkata Rao G. Newer RP-HPLC method for the determination of doxazosin in human plasma and formulation. Bull. Pharm. Res. 2012;2(1):1-4. Bhimavarapu R, Chitra KP, Meda H, Kanikanti D, Anne M, Gowthami N. Forced degradation study of paracetamol in tablet formulation using RP-HPLC. Bull. Pharm. Res. 2011;1(3):13-7. Bose A, Bhaumik U, Ghosh A, Chatterjee B, Chakrabarty US, Sarkar AK, Pal TK. LC-MS simultaneous determination of itopride hydrochloride and domperidone in human plasma. Chromatographia 2009;69(11-12):1233-41. [DOI: 10.1365/s10337-009-1032-0] British Pharmacopoeia, The Stationary Office: London, 2009; 572. Code Q2A - Text on Validation of Analytical Procedure Step3 Consensus Guideline, 1994, ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Code Q2B - Validation of Analytical Procedure Methodology Step-4 Consensus Guideline, 1994, ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. El-Shahawi MS, Bahaffi SO, El-Mogy T. Analysis of domperidone in pharmaceutical formulations and wastewater by differential pulse voltammetry at a glassycarbon electrode. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007;387(2):71925. [DOI: 10.1007/s00216-006-0906-3] Gosavi SA, Shirkhedkar AA, Jaiswal YS, Surana SJ. Quantitative planar chromatographic analysis of pantoprazole sodium sesquihydrate and domperidone in tablets. J. Planar Chromatogr. Mod. TLC 2006;19(110): 302-6. [DOI: 10.1556/JPC.19.2006.4.8] Hultman I, Stenhoff H, Liljeblad M. Determination of esomeprazole and its two main metabolites in human, rat and dog plasma by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2007;848(2):317-22. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jch romb.2006.10.074] Jain NA, Lohiya RT, Umekar MJ. Spectrophotometric determination of naproxen and esomeprazole in a laboratory mixture by simultaneous equation, absorption correction, absorption ratio and area under curve methods. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res.2011;2(5):130-4. Kapil K, Naik S, Garima J, Mishra N. Spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of paracetamol and domperidone in tablet formulation. Asian J. Research Chem. 2009;2(2):112-4. Lakshmana Prabu S, Shirwaikar A, Shirwaikar A, Dinesh Kumar C, Joseph A, Kumar R. Simultaneous estimation of esomeprazole and domperidone by UV spectro-

photometric method. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2008;70(1): 128-31. [DOI: 10.4103/0250-474X.40351] Li Z, Yao J, Zhang Z, Zhang L. Simultaneous determination of omeprazole and domperidone in dog plasma by LC-MS method. J. Chromatogr. Sci, 2009;47(10):881-4. Magesh AR, Vijayalakshmi R, Satyavati D, Sravanthi Devi G, Dhanaraju MD. Validated spectrophotometric estimation of esomeprazole using hydrotrophic solubilisation technique. Orient. J. Chem. 2010;26(3):1191-3. Patel B, Dedania Z, Dedania R, Ramolia C, Vidya Sagar G, Mehta RS. Simultaneous estimation of lansoprazole and domperidone in combined dosage form by RP-HPLC. Asian J. Research Chem. 2009;2(2):210-2. Patel AH, Patel JK, Patel KN, Rajput GC, Rajgor NB. Development and validation of derivative spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of domperidone and rabeprazole sodium in bulk and dosage forms. Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Res. 2010;1(1):1-5. Patel BH, Suhagia BN, Patel MM, Patel JR. Determination of pantoprazole, rabeprazole, esomeprazole, domperidone and itopride in pharmaceutical products by reversed phase liquid chromatography using single mobile phase. Chromatographia 2007;65(11-12):743-8. [DOI: 10.1365/ s10337-007-0220-z] Patel BH, Suhagia BN, Patel MM, Patel JR. HPTLC determination of rabeprazole and domperidone in capsules and its validation. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2008;46(4):304-7. [DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/46.4.304] Pawar SM, Patil BS, Patil RY. Validated HPTLC method for simultaneous quantitation of domperidone maleate and naproxen sodium in bulk drug and formulation. Eurasian J. Anal. Chem. 2010;5(3):284-92. Prasanthi V, Mary K, Narasimha Raju CH, Basaveswara Rao MV. Development and validation of new RP-HPLC method for determination of acetyl sulfisoxazole in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Bull. Pharm. Res. 2011; 1(1):47-53. Rajendra Prasad Y, Rajasekhar KK, Shankarananth V, Yaminikrishna HV, Saikumar S, Venkata Raghav Reddy P. Spectrophotometric method for the estimation of domperidone in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations. J. Pharm. Res. 2009;2(10):1593-4. Scott LJ, Dunn CJ, Mallarkey G, Sharpe M. Esomeprazole - a review of its use in the management of acid-related disorders. Drugs 2002;62(10):1503-38. Silvers D, Kipnes M, Broadstone V, Patterson D, Quigley EM, McCallum R, Leidy NK, Farup C, Liu Y, Joslyn A. Domperidone in the management of symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis: efficacy, tolerability and quality-of-life outcomes in a multicenter controlled trial, DOM-USA-5 study group. Clin. Ther. 1998;20(3):438-53. [DOI: 10.101 6/S0149-2918(98)80054-4] Singh RK, Ramakrishna S, Gupta P. RP-HPLC method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of ranitidine hydrochloride and domperidone in combined tablet dosage form. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2010; 1(8):77-87.

138

Jain et al

Bull. Pharm. Res. 2012;2(3)

Sivakumar T, Manavalan R, Valliappan K. Computerassisted optimization of liquid-liquid extraction for HPLC analysis of domperidone and pantoprazole in human plasma. Acta Chromatogr. 2008;20(4):549-62. [DOI: 10.15 56/AChrom.20.2008.4.2] Shindler JS, Finnerty GT, Towlson K, Dolan AL, Davies CL, Parkes JD. Domperidone and levodopa in parkinson’s disease. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1984;18(6):959-62. Thanikachalam S, Rajappan M, Kannappan V. Stabilityindicating HPLC method for simultaneous determination of pantoprazole and domperidone from their combination drug product. Chromatographia 2008;67(1-2):41-7. [DOI: 10.1365/s10337-007-0452-y] Xu DH, Lou HG, Yuan H, Jiang B, Zhou Q, Zhang ZM, Ruan ZR. Quantitative determination of domperidone in human plasma by ultra performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2008;22(4):433-40. [DOI: 10.1002/

bmc.952] Yadav A, Singh RM, Mathur SC, Saini PK, Singh GN. A simple and sensitive HPTLC method for simultaneous analysis of domperidone and paracetamol in tablet dosage forms. J. Planar Chromatogr. Mod. TLC 2009;22(6):421-4. [DOI: 10. 1556/JPC.22.2009.6.6] Zanitti L, Ferretti R, Gallinella B, La Torre F, Sanna ML, Mosca A, Cirilli R. Direct HPLC enantioseparation of omeprazole and its chiral impurities: application to the determination of enantiomeric purity of esomeprazole magnesium trihydrate. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2010; 52(5):665-71. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2010.02.021] Zenita Devi O, Basavaiah K, Vinay KB, Simple and selective spectrophotometric methods for the determination of domperidone in pharmaceuticals through charge transfer complex formation reaction. Turk. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012; 9(1):27-40.

*****

bpr058

139

Suggest Documents