OBS vs. CLC OBS VS. CLC. Content

OBS vs. CLC OBS VS. CLC Content 1 2 OBS .............................................................................................................
9 downloads 2 Views 1MB Size
OBS vs. CLC

OBS VS. CLC

Content 1

2

OBS ........................................................................................................................................ 2 1.1

Nomenclature ............................................................................................................... 2

1.2

List of classes ................................................................................................................. 2

CLC ......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1

List of classes ................................................................................................................. 6

3

Comparison of CLS and OBS .................................................................................................. 7

4

final statistic: OBS vs. CLC...................................................................................................... 9 4.1

Level 1 ........................................................................................................................... 9

4.2

Level 2 ......................................................................................................................... 10

4.3

Level 3 ......................................................................................................................... 11

4.4

CLC-Class specific statistic – level 3 ............................................................................. 12

4.5

OBS features smaller 25 ha (MMU) ............................................................................ 20

GEOVILLE

1/20

OBS vs. CLC

1

OBS

OBS – Occupation Biophysique du Sol – is an inventory of land cover and biotopes in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg at the scale of 1:10.000. The inventory is a classification of 76 different land cover and biotope types with five hierarchical levels. This database has been updated as part of the GSE Land extension for Luxembourg.

1.1

Nomenclature

The five main hierarchical levels of the nomenclature are: 1. Artificial surfaces Artificial surfaces encompass 29 specific classes. At level 3 the nomenclature encompasses built-up areas for residential or industrial use as well as commercial areas transport infrastructure construction areas and areas used for mineral extraction or deposition of waste materials or green areas in an urban context (e.g. parks cemeteries sport and leisure areas). Each of these level 3 classes is further differentiated into individual classes with distinct uses or functions. 2. Agricultural areas This level includes 8 different kinds of surfaces used for agricultural production. The main use of the surface is to be mapped i.e. seasonal differences (e.g. harvested croplands) or materials temporarily stocked on the land are not mapped. 3. Forests and semi-natural areas Compared to Corine Land Cover this level has undergone a strong restructuration and the inclusion of additional interpretation parameters going beyond the information provided in the image alone. The level is subdivided into two main groups of classes: 14 forest classes mainly differentiated by its leaf type and another 13 classes describing different types of semi-natural lands (grasslands shrublands open areas). Common base for the semi-natural lands is little human impact on them. 4. Wetlands The nomenclature differentiates 3 types of wetlands which are mainly defined by the vegetation type found. 5. Water Water classes (9) are first differentiated into running water or still water bodies. Subsequently both are further subdivided into natural or artificial origin respectively with or without biological interest.

1.2

List of classes

The land cover and biotope features are divided into 76 classes with areal extend (polygon data). Landscape elements (small water bodies hedges isolated trees tree rows or groups of trees) below the official minimum mapping unit are mapped as point and line elements. Overall 20 point and line features are differentiated leading to a total of almost 100 different types of land cover and biotope types in form of point line and polygon data.

GEOVILLE

2/20

OBS vs. CLC

The official list of classes is available only in German and French. Artificial areas DE

FR

BSC

UAD

1.1.1

BSM

UAA

1.1.2.1.1

BSO

UAS

1.1.2.1.2

BSB

UAL

1.1.2.2

Siedlungsbänder entlang von Straßen

BSP

UAP

1.1.2.3.1

BSR

UAF

1.1.2.3.2

BSE

UAH

1.1.2.4

BII

UIL

1.2.1.1.1

BIG

UIA

1.2.1.1.2

BIO

UPS

1.2.1.2

BIS

UPE

1.2.1.3.1

BIW

UPU

1.2.1.3.2

BIA

UPH

1.2.1.3.3

BIL

UAC

1.2.1.4

BVS

UTR

1.2.2.1.1

Öffentliche Plätze Siedlungsbrachen ohne/geringe Vegetation Siedlungs-Ödland Einzelhäuser Höfe etc. außerhalb geschlossener Bebauung Großindustrielle Anlagen Schwerindustrie Gemischte Industrie und Gewerbegebiete Militär großformatige Dienstleistungsgebäude Öffentliche und soziokulturelle Einrichtungen und Bebauungen Sondergebiete Flächen der Stromversorgung Sondergebiete Flächen der Wasserversorgung Sondergebiete Flächen der Gasversorgung Landwirtschaftliche und gartenbauliche Infrastruktur (Stallanlagen Gewächshäuser) bedeutende Straßen (>20m)

BVP

UTS

1.2.2.1.2

Parkplatz

Zones de stationnement

BVB

UTF

1.2.2.2

Bahnanlage und deren Nebenbetriebe

Infrastructure ferroviaire gare

BVH

UTP

1.2.3

Hafengebiete

Zone portuaire

BVT

UTA

1.2.4.1

Flughafen Terminal und Hangargebäude

Aéroport; terminal hangar

BVL

UTT

1.2.4.2

Flughafen Landebahn und Fahrbahnen

Aéroport; piste et taxiways

BAF

UEM

1.3.1

Abbaufläche Tagebau

Zone d'extraction de matériaux

BAA

UER

1.3.2.1

Aufschüttung und Deponien

Remblais et décharges

BAH

UEC

1.3.2.2

Halden

Crassier

BAB

UEF

1.3.2.3

Brachen industrieller Gebiete

Friche industrielle

BAU

UEH

1.3.2.4

Baustellen

Chantier

BGF

UVC

1.4.1.1

Friedhöfe

Cimetière

BGG

UVV

1.4.1.2

Grünanlagen Parks

BGS

UVS

1.4.2.1

Sport- Spiel- Camping- Golfplätze

BGK

UVJ

1.4.2.2

Kleingartenanlagen

Zones de verdure parcs Terrain de sport espace récréatif camping golf etc. Cité jardinière

GEOVILLE

ATT

German Stark verdichtete städtisch geprägte Gebiete (City) Sonstige Siedlung mit bedeutender Vegetation Sonstige Siedlung ohne bedeutende Vegetation

3/20

French Tissu urbain dense Zone semi-urbaine avec végétation importante Zone semi-urbaine sans végétation importante Urbanisation longiligne de longe des routes Bandes urbanisées le long des routes Place Friche urbaine Espace urbain ouvert sans verdure importante Habitat dissémine en zone rurale hameau Industrie lourde Zone d'activités économiques terrain militaire large bâtiments des services publics Bâtiments et installations à destination socio-culturelle Installations de distribution électrique Installation de traitement des eaux usés Installations de stockage d'hydrocarbures et de gaz Constructions agricoles et horticoles étables serres Routes importantes (>20m) voies rapides

OBS vs. CLC

Agricultural areas DE LAA

FR RAA

ATT 2.1.1.1

German Ackerflächen einjährige Kulturen Baumschule Gartenbau Weihnachtsbaumkulturen Weinbauflächen im Terrassenanbau

French Terres agricoles cultures annuelles

LBG

RAH

2.1.1.2

LWT

RVT

2.2.1.1

LWS

RVA

2.2.1.2

Autres vignoble

2.2.2.2

sonstige Weinbauflächen Obstanbau Streuobstwiesen Hochstammkulturen Obstanbau Niederstammkulturen

LSH

RHT

2.2.2.1

LSN

RBT

LFG LMG

RPR

2.3.1.1

Feuchtgrünland

Prairie humide

RPM

2.3.1.2

Mesophiles Grünland

Prairie mésophile

Pépinières horticulture arbres de Noël Vignoble en terrasse Verger à hautes tiges Verger à basses tiges

Forests and semi-natural lands DE WLE

FR FFC

WLB

FFH

3.1.1.2

Laubwald mit dominierender Buche

Futaie feuillue à dominance de hêtre

WLS

FFD

3.1.1.3

Laubwald aus sonstigen Laubbaumarten

WLM

FFM

3.1.1.4

Laubwald gemischt Eiche Buche

WLN

FTC

3.1.1.5

Eichen-Niederwald

Futaie de feuillus divers Futaie feuillue mélangée de chênes et de hêtres Taillis de chêne

WLP

FFP

3.1.1.6.1

Laubwald Pappel-Monokulturen

Peupleraie

WLO

FFP

3.1.1.6.2

Autres monocultures feuillues

WNF

FRE

3.1.2.1

Laubwald forstliche Monokulturen Nadelwälder aus Fichten (Douglasie / Tanne)

WNK

FRP

3.1.2.2

WNM

FRM

3.1.2.3

WMT

FMP

3.1.3.1

WMF

FMM

3.1.3.2

WAU

FCD

3.1.3.3

WSF

FSD

3.1.3.4

KSI

PSI

3.2.1.1

Nadelmischwälder aus 3.1.2.1 und 3.1.2.2 gemischt Mischwald (Laub/Nadel) einzeln oder truppweise Mischung Mischwald (Laub/Nadel) fließende Durchmischung Forstliche Pflanzung (Aufforstungen Naturverjüngung Dickungen; Baumart nicht erkennbar) Sonstige Forstflächen (Schlagflur Windbruch) Silicattrockenrasen Sandtrockenrasen

KKA

PCA

3.2.1.2

Kalkmagerrasen

KFE

PSR

3.2.1.3

Fels- und Schotterrasen Pionierfluren

KHE

PLR

3.2.2

KRM

PFR

3.2.3.1

KRF

PFH

3.2.3.2

SBT

BPS

3.2.4.1

SBM

BPF

3.2.4.2

Heiden Rohbodenstandorte Ruderalstandorte außerhalb besiedelter Bereiche Brachen und Staudenfluren mittlerer bis trockener Standorte Ruderalstandorte außerhalb besiedelter Bereiche Brachen und Staudenfluren feuchter Standorte Buschwerk Vorwälder trockener Standorte Buschwerk Vorwälder mittlerer Standorte

SBF

BPH

3.2.4.3

SBG

BPE

3.2.4.4

SBP

BPA

3.2.4.5

OFF

RNU

OBS

REN

GEOVILLE

ATT 3.1.1.1

German Laubwald mit dominierender Eiche

Nadelwälder aus Kiefern u/o Lärchen

French Futaie feuillue à dominance de chêne

Forêt résineuse (épicéas douglas sapins) Forêt résineuse (pins mélèzes et autres résineux) Forêt résineuse mélangée Forêt mélangée (feuillus/résineux) par pied par bouquet Forêt mélangée (feuillus/résineux) mélange intime Régénération naturelle Culture forestière d'essences non définies Autres surfaces forestières (coupes rases chablis) Pelouse silicicole Pelouse calcaire Pelouses pionnières (sur substrat rocheux ou graveleux) Landes sols nus Surfaces rudéralisées et friches en zone rurales sur sols secs à frais Surfaces rudéralisées et friches en zone rurale sur sols humides Buissons prébois sur sols secs Buissons prébois sur sols frais

3.3.2

Buschwerk Vorwälder feuchter Standorte Blockschutt- und Geröllwälder / vorwälder Gehölzpflanzungen (junge Strauch und Böschungspflanzungen) Offene Felsflächen

Roche nue

3.3.2.1

Offene Blockschutt- und Schotterflächen

Eboulis et graviers non colonisés

4/20

Buissons prébois sur sols humides Forêts prébois sur éboulis Plantations cubustives

OBS vs. CLC

Wetlands DE FRO

FR ROS

ATT 4.1.1.1

German Röhrichte Landröhrichte

Roselière

French

FGS

MAG

4.1.1.2

Großseggensümpfe Großseggenrieder

Magnocariçaie

FKS

MBA

4.1.1.3

Übergangsmoore Kleinseggenrieder

Bas marais

Water DE GFN

FR ECN

ATT 5.1.1.1.1

German Naturnahe Fließgewässerabschnitte

French Cours d’eau naturel

GFF

ECA

5.1.1.1.2

Cours d’eau artificialisé

GFK

EEA

5.1.1.2

Naturferne Fließgewässerabschnitte Fließgewässer künstlicher Entstehung (Kanal)

GSN

EPN

5.1.2.1

GSK

EPA

5.1.2.2

GAA

EBM

5.1.2.3

GMD

EMA

5.1.2.4

GBB

BRE

5.1.2.5.1

GBO

BRS

5.1.2.5.2

GEOVILLE

Stillgewässer anthropogen naturnah Stillgewässer künstlicher Entstehung Stillgewässer anthropogen naturfern Altarme Altwasser "Mardelle" Becken Reservoir (Ufer u/o Grund aus künstlichem Material) von biol. Interesse Becken Reservoir (Ufer u/o Grund aus künstlichem Material) ohne biol. Wert

5/20

Cours d’eau artificiels Plans d'eau anthropogène proche de l'état naturel Plan d'eau artificiel Bras mort Mardelle Bassin réservoir ayant un intérêt écologique Bassin réservoir à ciel ouvert sans intérêt écologique

OBS vs. CLC

2

CLC

2.1

List of classes

LEVEL 1 1. ARTIFICIAL SURFACES

LEVEL 2 1.1. Urban fabric 1.2. Industrial commercial and transport units 1.3. Mine dump and construction sites

2. AGRICULTURAL AREAS

1.4. Artificial non-agricultural vegetated areas 2.1. Arable land 2.2. Permanent crops 2.3.Pastures 2.4. Heterogeneous agricultural areas

3. FOREST AND SEMI-NATURAL AREAS

3.1. Forests 3.2. Scrub and/or herbaceous associations

3.3. Open spaces with little or no vegetation 4. WETLANDS

4.1. Inland wetlands 4.2. Marine wetlands

5. WATER BODIES

5.1. Inland waters 5.2. Marine waters

GEOVILLE

6/20

1.1.1. 1.1.2. 1.2.1. 1.2.2. 1.2.3. 1.2.4. 1.3.1. 1.3.2. 1.3.3. 1.4.1. 1.4.2. 2.1.1. 2.1.2. 2.1.3. 2.2.1. 2.2.2. 2.2.3. 2.3.1. 2.4.1. 2.4.2. 2.4.3. 2.4.4. 3.1.1. 3.1.2. 3.1.3. 3.2.1. 3.2.2. 3.2.3. 3.2.4. 3.3.1. 3.3.2. 3.3.3. 3.3.4. 3.3.5. 4.1.1. 4.1.2. 4.2.1. 4.2.2. 4.2.3. 5.1.1. 5.1.2. 5.2.1. 5.2.2. 5.2.3.

LEVEL 3 Continuous urban fabric Discontinuous urban fabric Industrial or commercial units Road and rail networks and associated land Port areas Airports Mineral extraction sites Dump sites Construction sites Green urban areas Port and leisure facilities Non-irrigated arable land Permanently irrigated land Rice fields Vineyards Fruit trees and berry plantations Olive groves Pastures Annual crops associated with permanent crops Complex cultivation patterns Land principally occupied by agriculture with significant areas of natural vegetation Agro-forestry areas Broad-leaved forest Coniferous forest Mixed forest Natural grassland Moors and heathland Sclerophyllous vegetation Transitional woodland-scrub Beaches dunes sands Bare rocks Sparsely vegetated areas Burnt areas Glaciers and perpetual snow Inland marshes Peat bogs Salt marshes Salines Intertidal flats Water courses Water bodies Coastal lagoons Estuaries Sea and ocean

OBS vs. CLC

3

COMPARISON OF CLC AND OBS

Both classifications were imported to ArcGIS and intersected to obtain the OBS classes which are part of the large CLC polygons / classes.

Figure 1 left: OBS right: CLC-Luxembourg

Table 1 shows a comparison of the surface (in km2) and number of polygons per land cover class in OBS2007 and CLC2006. Please note that most classes description of OBS and CLC are similar at level 3 of the nomenclature, but for some classes signification differences exist: OBS classes 3.1.3.x & 3.2.4.x: The definition of class 3.2.4.x in OBS is different from CLC. OBS does not contain any forestry surfaces without trees (clear cuts, storm damages, regrowth) in this class. These surfaces are mapped as 3.1.3.3 (regrowth) and 3.1.3.4 (clear cuts, storm damages. OBS class 3.2.3.x This class describes pioneer vegetation areas while in CLC this class is used for Mediterranean-type vegetation. Also, OBS does not contain any heterogeneous classes (classes 2.4.x in CLC).

GEOVILLE

7/20

OBS vs. CLC

Table 1 OBS /CLC statistics – surface comparison at level 3

OBS LEVEL 3

COUNT

1.1.1 1.1.2 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 1.2.4 1.3.1 1.3.2 1.4.1 1.4.2 2.1.1 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.3.1

319 17687 4576 1412 7 29 88 1358 1071 1030 10515 825 4690 16066

3.1.1 3.1.2 3.1.3* 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.4* 3.3.2 4.1.1 5.1.1 5.1.2

17911 18193 16140 679 521 3405 7833 135 264 259 773

GEOVILLE

AREA [km²] 2.41 127.34 42.00 74.55 0.18 1.28 2.55 12.55 8.29 12.67 559.97 13.55 31.99 702.08

CLC level 3

111 112 121 122 123 124 131 132 141 142 211 221 222 231 241 242 243 521.94 311 201.01 312 188.05 313 5.40 2.83 21.34 36.64 324 0.56 2.17 6.76 511 3.66 512

8/20

7 209 41 11 1 1 6 10 6 10 327 16 3 252 1 178 124 233 137 96

AREA [km²] 7.14 182.59 27.07 5.40 0.37 4.11 2.35 3.92 3.38 4.32 301.96 14.27 0.97 376.07 0.89 471.35 227.04 638.00 119.15 178.13

8

5.76

1 5

1.00 6.47

COUNT

OBS vs. CLC

4

FINAL STATISTIC:

OBS VS. CLC

The Intersect attribute table was exported to Excel and a Pivot Table was produced. In order to assess the composition of each CLC class with respect to the higher resolution national land cover database, the percentage of each OBS class for every CLC class was calculated. Table 2 OBS-CLC Matrix – AREA [m²] – level 1

LEVEL 1 AREA

OBS

CLC



TOTAL

1

2

3

4

5

1

177092955

40146982

21960466

93235

1363098

2

76945234

1183166703

128953829

1554184

3

28824055

83984813

825809584

505945

5

934826

288367

1037155

283797070

1307586865

62.40

90.48

[%]

TOTAL 240656736

73.59

1942836

1392562787

84.96

1923542

941047938.6

87.75

14890

5191457

7466694.439

69.53

977761033

2168254.65

10420932.1

2581734156

84.46

0.00

49.82

2191260699 84.88

4.1

Level 1

OBS

Table 3 LEVEL 1 – OBS percentages for every CLC class at level 1

PERCENT of CLC 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL

GEOVILLE

1 73.59 16.68 9.13 0.04 0.57 100.00

9/20

[%]

CLC 2 5.53 84.96 9.26 0.11 0.14 100.00

3 3.06 8.92 87.75 0.05 0.20 100.00

5 12.52 3.86 13.89 0.20 69.53 100.00

OBS vs. CLC

4.2

Level 2

Table 4 LEVEL 2 – OBS percentages for every CLC class at level 2 CLC 11

12

13

14

21

22

23

24

31

32

51

11

51.74

2.39

0.45

3.93

0.73

2.60

1.81

2.48

0.37

1.60

1.17

12

17.31

58.33

7.70

7.39

2.65

6.84

2.67

3.15

2.23

3.81

4.88

13

1.36

10.46

45.50

0.81

0.25

0.89

0.30

0.31

0.15

2.36

0.21

14

4.32

1.84

0.14

52.26

0.22

0.63

0.33

0.41

0.28

1.28

6.27

21

3.09

2.11

6.31

0.62

75.54

2.85

15.83

34.17

2.72

5.52

0.52

22

3.05

0.39

0.03

0.30

0.71

68.55

2.14

2.16

0.40

0.07

0.61

23

12.40

8.38

1.37

5.19

14.20

5.85

70.44

44.57

5.80

3.00

2.73

31

2.93

2.40

3.43

20.85

4.22

3.25

3.80

9.75

86.04

38.71

1.17

32

3.34

12.90

33.06

5.54

1.40

8.42

2.30

2.73

1.72

40.00

12.72

33

0.01

0.04

0.64

0.04

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.03

3.60

0.00

41

0.04

0.01

0.04

0.23

0.02

0.01

0.14

0.14

0.05

0.m00

0.20

51

0.41

0.75

1.34

2.82

0.05

0.11

0.24

0.13

0.21

0.04

69.53

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OBS

PERCENT of CLC

TOTAL

GEOVILLE

10/20

OBS vs. CLC

4.3

Level 3

Table 5 LEVEL 3 – OBS percentages for every CLC class at level 3

Percent of CLC

111

112

121

122

123

124

131

132

141

142

211

221

222

231

241

242

243

311

312

313

324

511

512

OBS

CLC

111

28

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

112

38

51

3

1

2

1

0

1

7

1

1

2

7

2

1

2

3

0

0

0

2

7

0

121

11

9

50

7

20

3

2

4

4

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

1

4

0

122

15

8

14

39

9

9

4

5

7

3

2

6

3

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

3

16

2

123

0

0

0

0

35

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

124

0

0

0

0

0

27

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

131

0

0

1

0

0

0

44

4

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

132

0

1

10

5

0

14

12

35

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

141

4

2

1

0

0

0

0

0

30

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

31

1

142

1

2

1

0

0

0

0

0

7

62

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

211

1

3

2

2

0

1

10

4

1

1

76

3

7

16

41

37

27

2

4

3

6

0

1

221

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

68

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

222

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

2

41

2

2

1

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

231

0

13

5

5

5

39

1

2

2

8

14

4

27

70

36

44

45

6

6

5

3

4

2

311

1

2

2

2

1

0

1

2

23

8

2

2

4

2

17

4

7

59

16

39

18

1

1

312

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

2

1

0

3

1

0

2

4

12

51

21

2

0

0

313

0

1

1

1

0

0

5

0

3

6

1

0

0

1

0

2

3

15

20

25

19

0

0

321

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

17

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

16

0

0

322

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

323

0

1

5

27

2

4

16

1

4

1

1

5

0

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

4

7

4

324

0

2

5

7

4

1

2

24

5

1

1

4

7

1

0

1

2

1

0

2

20

17

7

332

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

0

0

411

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

511

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

7

54

512

0

0

0

0

24

0

3

0

2

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

25

TOTAL

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

10 0

GEOVILLE

11/20

OBS vs. CLC

4.4

CLC-Class specific statistic – level 3

For the following Corine level 3 classes the OBS percentages are displayed: 111

OBS



112 121 122 132 141 142 211 222 231 311 312 313 323 324

CLC – 112 [%] 51 9 8 1 2 2 3 3 13 2 1 1 1 2

112

OBS



111 112 121 122 141 142 211 311

CLC- 111 [%] 28 38 11 15 4 1 1 1

GEOVILLE

12/20

OBS vs. CLC

121

OBS



CLC – 122 [%] 1 7 39 5 2 1 5 2 1 27 7

123

OBS



112 121 122 132 211 221 231 311 313 323 324

122

OBS



112 121 122 131 132 141 142 211 231 311 313 323 324

CLC – 121 [%] 3 50 14 1 10 1 1 2 5 2 1 5 5

GEOVILLE

112 121 122 123 231 311 323 324 512

CLC- 123 [%] 2 20 9 35 5 1 2 4 24

13/20

OBS vs. CLC

124

OBS



112 121 122 131 132 211 231 311 321 323 324 332

CLC – 132 [%] 1 4 5 4 35 4 2 2 17 1 24 1

132

OBS



121 122 131 132 211 231 311 313 323 324 512

CLC – 131 [%] 2 4 44 12 10 1 1 5 16 2 3

131

OBS



112 121 122 124 131 132 211 231 323 324

CLC – 124 [%] 1 3 9 27 0 14 1 39 4 1

GEOVILLE

14/20

OBS vs. CLC

141

OBS



112 121 122 141 142 211 231 311 312 313 322 323 324 512

CLC – 142 [%] 1 2 3 2 62 1 8 8 2 6 1 1 1 3

142

OBS



112 121 122 132 141 142 211 231 311 312 313 323 324 511 512

CLC – 141 [%] 7 4 7 1 30 7 1 2 23 1 3 4 5 1 2

GEOVILLE

15/20

OBS vs. CLC

211

OBS



112 121 122 211 222 231 311 312 324

CLC – 222 [%] 7 1 3 7 41 27 4 3 7

222

OBS



112 121 122 132 211 221 222 231 311 323 324

CLC – 221 [%] 2 1 6 1 3 68 2 4 2 5 4

221

OBS



112 121 122 211 222 231 311 312 313 323 324

CLC – 211 [%] 1 1 2 76 1 14 2 1 1 1 1

GEOVILLE

16/20

OBS vs. CLC

231

OBS



112 121 122 211 222 231 311 312 313 323 324

CLC – 242 [%] 2 1 2 37 1 44 4 2 2 1 1

242

OBS



112 121 122 211 222 231 311 323

CLC – 241 [%] 1 1 2 41 2 36 17 1

241

OBS



112 121 122 211 222 231 311 312 313 323 324

CLC – 231 [%] 2 1 2 16 2 70 2 1 1 1 1

GEOVILLE

17/20

OBS vs. CLC

243

OBS



122 211 231 311 312 313

CLC – 313 [%] 2 3 5 39 21 25

313

OBS



122 211 231 311 312 313

CLC – 312 [%] 2 4 6 16 51 20

312

OBS



122 211 231 311 312 313 324 332 411

CLC – 311 [%] 2 2 6 59 12 15 1 0 0

311

OBS



112 121 122 211 221 222 231 311 312 313 323 324

CLC – 243 [%] 3 1 2 27 0 3 45 7 4 3 1 2

GEOVILLE

18/20

OBS vs. CLC

324

OBS



122 141 142 211 231 311 323 324

CLC – 512 [%] 2 1 1 1 2 1 4 7

512

OBS



112 121 122 123 141 142 221 231 311 323 324 511

CLC – 511 [%] 7 4 16 2 31 1 1 4 1 7 17 7

511

OBS



112 121 122 131 132 142 211 231 311 312 313 321 323 324 332

CLC – 324 [%] 2 1 3 1 2 1 6 3 18 2 19 16 4 20 4

GEOVILLE

19/20

OBS vs. CLC

511 512

4.5

54 25

OBS features smaller 25 ha (MMU)

From the OBS classification all features smaller 25 ha were exported and a statistic was calculated (areas are given in m2):

ID 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Minimum Maximum Average OBS COUNT AREA AREA AREA 1.1.1 312 555 23.638 6.960 1.1.2 16.974 357 24.998 5.987 1.2.1 4.242 500 24.909 5.207 1.2.2 1.344 0 24.592 3.550 1.2.3 3 4.482 6.206 5.452 1.2.4 19 719 24.921 6.867 1.3.1 68 567 23.863 6.815 1.3.2 1.262 505 24.619 4.574 1.4.1 1.008 508 24.844 4.885 1.4.2 908 516 24.957 6.465 2.1.1 4.786 513 24.995 11.818 2.2.1 653 516 24.982 8.615 2.2.2 4.490 511 24.999 5.322 2.3.1 10.346 180 24.993 8.529 3.1.1 13.929 501 24.997 6.976 3.1.2 16.283 284 24.991 6.261 3.1.3 14.332 500 24.997 6.382 3.2.1 642 502 24.546 5.721 3.2.2 503 504 24.088 4.301 3.2.3 3.262 500 24.970 4.694 3.2.4 7.666 380 24.916 3.884 3.3.2 134 603 24.112 3.897 4.1.1 244 537 23.793 5.537 5.1.1 219 191 24.728 6.076 5.1.2 756 500 24.939 2.531

GEOVILLE

20/20

Sum StdDev AREA AREA 2.171.573 4.988 101.626.680 5.470 22.087.845 5.151 4.771.031 4.333 16.355 882 130.478 6.194 463.388 6.265 5.772.858 4.714 4.924.004 4.871 5.869.837 5.768 56.561.417 6.630 5.625.632 7.006 23.897.672 4.681 88.245.000 6.470 97.166.289 5.963 101.955.872 5.661 91.469.460 5.629 3.672.927 5.274 2.163.168 4.141 15.311.347 4.735 29.771.683 4.041 522.157 3.782 1.350.992 5.106 1.330.550 5.756 1.913.640 3.499

Variance AREA 24.884.623 29.917.695 26.535.717 18.774.198 778.315 38.370.904 39.248.914 22.225.251 23.728.248 33.267.714 43.950.538 49.077.069 21.911.550 41.862.213 35.557.533 32.044.345 31.690.732 27.816.067 17.151.234 22.420.766 16.327.453 14.300.095 26.070.922 33.127.258 12.242.513