Non-metastatic CRPC and Asymptomatic Metastatic CRPC- Which treatment for which patient

Non-metastatic CRPC and Asymptomatic Metastatic CRPCWhich treatment for which patient Michael A. Carducci, M.D., FASCO AEGON Professor in Prostate Can...
Author: Melina Randall
4 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
Non-metastatic CRPC and Asymptomatic Metastatic CRPCWhich treatment for which patient Michael A. Carducci, M.D., FASCO AEGON Professor in Prostate Cancer Research Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center Baltimore, MD

May 4, 2012

1

Disclosures

• Consultant

Amgen Bayer Sanofi Data Safety Monitoring Medivation/Astellas

Educational Objectives • Discuss the clinical state “non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer” • Review treatment options and controversies for this patient population • Examine differences between “non-metastatic” to “asymptomatic” CRPC and the treatment landscape

July 11, 2013

3

Definition of Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) • CRPC defined as disease progression on androgen deprivation therapy • Criteria defining CRPC vary – Presence of progressive metastatic measurable disease (by RECIST) – Progression of bone metastases (by bone scan) – Biochemical progression: 2 consecutive increases in PSA – Castrate testosterone levels ( 18.8 mos

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Yrs Since Random Assignment Smith MR, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2918-2925. Reprinted with permission. © 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Denosumab to Prevent Metastases

Patients with CRPC and no bone metastases; PSA > 8 or PSADT < 10 mos

Denosumab 120 mg monthly

Placebo monthly (N = 1435)

 Primary endpoint: bone metastasis–free survival

Smith MR, et al. Lancet. 2012.

Proportion of Patients With Bone Metastasis–Free Survival

Primary Endpoint: Bone Metastasis-Free Survival 1.0

HR: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.73-0.98; P = .028)

0.8 0.6 0.4 Median Mos Placebo 25.2 Denosumab 29.5

0.2 0

39

42

Patients at Risk, n Placebo 716 691 569 500 421 375 345 300 259 215 168 137 99 60 Denosumab 716 695 605 521 456 400 368 324 279 228 185 153 111 59

36 35

0

3

Smith MR, et al. Lancet. 2012.

6

9

12

15 18 21 24 Study Mo

27

30 33

36

Metastasis-Free Survival What is meaningful? • ODAC meeting to discuss 11/2011 – Meaningful > 1 year, and based on toxicity profile

• ARN-509 / Enzalutamide / Orteroneleach will launch Phase III studies to delay metastasis • Can immunotherapy be moved to this setting, when no improved PFS noted in more advanced disease July 11, 2013

25

Androgen Pathways Still Active • Maintenance of castrate level of testosterone life long • Second line hormonal therapy most commonly used – Anti-androgens- bicalutamide, nilutamide, flutamide – Androgen synthesis inhibitors- ketoconazole – Estrogens – Newer agents (not yet approved but available) July 11, 2013

26

Sipuleucel-T Ketoconazole Estrogens Abiraterone Orteronel Enzalutamide Tasquinimod Ipilumimab Radium-223 11ststline line

M0

M1

Low-volume metastases, no/minimal symptoms

Docetaxel Curtisen Cabazitaxel Mitoxantrone

1st line Cytotoxic Progressive metastases, symptomatic

Mitoxantrone Abiraterone Cabazitaxel Enzaluatmide Radium 223 Cabozantinib

2nd line

High-volume or symptomatic metastases

Death

Sipuleucel-T Ketoconazole Estrogens Abiraterone Orteronel Enzalutamide Tasquinimod Ipilumimab

Improve survival QoL Docetaxel Curtisen Cabazitaxel Mitoxantrone Extend time Delay symptoms Defer chemotherapy

1st line 11ststline line

M0

M1

Low-volume metastases, no/minimal symptoms

Chemotherapy Based Progressive metastases, symptomatic

High-volume or symptomatic metastases

Death

FDA-Approved Agents for Prevention of SREs in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Agent Zoledronic acid Denosumab

Drug Class

Recommended Dose and Schedule

Bisphosphonate

4 mg IV q3-4w

RANKL-targeted MAb

120 mg SQ q4w

 NCCN recommends either zoledronic acid or denosumab for prevention/delay of SREs in men with metastatic CRPC[1]  Choice between agents may be guided by – Underlying comorbidities – Adverse events: renal insufficiency, ONJ, hypocalcemia – Logistics - Differences in administration (SQ vs IV) – Cost considerations 1. NCCN. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer. v.4.2011.

Summary • In 2013, “Non-metastatic” CRPC remains a clinical state • Management remains conservative – Reliance on traditional agents – Bone health – Attention to metabolic issues

• Asymptomatic metastatic CRPC in the midst of changing treatment landscape, with limited data on sequence /timing July 11, 2013

30

Suggest Documents