Nevada County Demographic & Statistical Profile

  Neva N adaa Cooun nty Dem mograp phic & Statiistical Profille Preepared by b the Neevada Co ounty Exxecutivee Office Fisscal Yeaar 2015-1 16 Int...
Author: Clyde Welch
4 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size
 

Neva N adaa Cooun nty Dem mograp phic & Statiistical Profille

Preepared by b the Neevada Co ounty Exxecutivee Office Fisscal Yeaar 2015-1 16

Introduction

Rock Creek Interpretive Trail

Incorporated in 1851, Nevada County was named after its most prominent mining town Nevada City. Since that time Nevada County has prospered from a mining community in to a diverse and thriving environment to live and work. Nevada County has long been recognized as a tourist destination with its extraordinary natural beauty of forests, rivers, mountains and lakes that provide an aesthetic backdrop to everyday life. The County is well known as a mecca of outdoor activities, including hiking, mountain biking, skiing and much more.

Additionally, tourists and locals alike revel in the vibrant art and cultural scene that has always been a crucial part of the community. Whether it’s taking in a performance by a prominent musician at the Center for the Arts, touring the studios of local artists, or enjoying a play at the Nevada Theater where Mark Twain and Jack London performed, Nevada County has a lot to offer. Visitors are seldom disappointed by the historic architecture, unique shops and thriving culinary scene in our small towns. Street fairs and farmers’ markets are abundant, creating a strong sense of community. Beyond the qualities that make Nevada County an attractive place to unwind, it has qualities that make it a highly desirable place in which to work. The County is comprised of three unique, historic towns, Truckee, Nevada City and Grass Valley, with Nevada City voted as one of America’s Coolest Small Towns in 2014 by Budget Travel Magazine. The economy is well-supported by a wide array of industries including manufacturing, retail, technology, agriculture, construction and health services. Nevada County has an above-average high school graduation rate, accessibility to traditional, charter and private schools, and higher level education at our recently expanded local Sierra College campus. Well-maintained roads make it easy to get around and Nevada County has targeted infrastructure projects such as the broadband initiative and library technology center, offering opportunities for viable expansion while maintaining a small-town feel. Due to Nevada County’s effective approach to criminal justice, the County has low crime rates relative to comparison counties. The Nevada County Demographic and Statistical Profile for 2015/2016 includes the following topics: community and society, government, housing, transportation, work and business. We hope that you will enjoy this profile of Nevada County. Note on Comparison Data: Nevada County selected seven counties (Butte, El Dorado, Mendocino, Napa, Placer, Sutter, and Tehama) for comparison purposes on some shared characteristics throughout this report, including rural geography, close to an urban center, demographics, and size. The intent is to provide insight into Nevada County’s unique community, social, geographic, and demographic environment.

 

1. Community and Society  Geography Residents and visitors are taken by Nevada County’s physical landscape, including historic foothill towns nestled amidst pristine rivers, picturesque forests and the rugged beauty of the Sierra Nevada Mountains. Established at the height of the Gold Rush in 1851, Nevada County is home to three incorporated areas (Grass Valley, Nevada City and Truckee,) and a variety of unincorporated communities and rural areas. Nevada County offers a rural and small-town lifestyle, while still being located within a convenient distant from urban centers in Sacramento, the Bay Area and Reno. In addition to the beautiful setting, the strong sense of community and high quality of life found here are attractive attributes of the local culture. The weather of Nevada County is another valued attribute. Here one can enjoy the California sun while still experiencing all four seasons. Rain averages just over ten inches in January and summer temperature are mild with average highs near 85 degrees in July. Our higher elevations receive on average 206 inches of snow a year, although some years can see significantly more or less snow, such as 1906 when 76 feet of snow fell during the winter, compared to the historic lows of the last couple years.

City

Direction

Miles

San Francisco

West

157

Reno

Northeast

91

South Lake Tahoe

Northeast

94

Sacramento

Southwest

60

 

Recreation Recreational opportunities are often centered around the natural environment. Scenic trails, alpine lakes, the Yuba River and the Sierra Nevada Mountains all support numerous recreation activities, including skiing, biking, hiking, fishing, kayaking, hunting and backpacking. The wealth of recreation opportunities and the allure of the County’s rustic forests and mountains have contributed to a vibrant and healthy community. Outdoor adventure opportunities are plentiful in the County, but what increasingly draws visitors is Scotts Flat Lake, Nevada City the array of cultural experiences available. A vibrant nightlife, a variety of restaurants, state parks, and an abundance of shopping means that visitors and locals can experience small-town life without having to forgo indulgence in pleasures more typical of an urban setting. With a calendar packed with street fairs, festivals, art exhibits, local theater and children’s activities, the possibilities are endless for those of all age groups and interests.

Tourism Nevada County provides a welcoming and exciting experience for visitors. Whether they come to watch the Tour of Nevada City bicycle race, hit the slopes in Truckee or enjoy the Cornish Christmas street fair, there’s something for everyone here. Tourism is a key economic generator in Nevada County. According to a study by Dean Runyon Associates, in 2011 Nevada County benefitted from $283 million in travel related spending. From 1992-2011, visitor spending in Nevada County increased on average 3.2% annually. Spending by visitors generates sales in lodging, food services, recreation, transportation, and retail businesses. These sales support jobs for County residents and contribute tax revenue to local and state government.

http://www.deanrunyan.com/doc_library/CAImp.pdf

   

 

 

Population With just under 100,000 residents, Nevada County is the 36th most populous county in California. The population grew from 92,053 in 2000 to 98,764 in 2010, but declined slightly to 97,225 in 2014. Nevada County saw its highest growth between the 1950s and 1990s, increasing by 260% between 1950 and 1980, and another 70% between 1980 and 1990. The decline in population is correlated to the economic downturn, as some people left the area to find employment or less expensive housing. Preliminary data indicates that the population is again growing slightly. Due to the continued recovery, coupled with several upcoming infrastructure projects that will make the area more conducive to growth, the population is expected to grow moderately in coming years. California Department of finance projections show Nevada County’s population topping 100,000 sometime after 2015, and an estimated population of 101,767 by 2020.

20,000 Grass Valley

Truckee

15,000 Nevada City

10,000

5,000

-

Dept. of Finance, Demographic Research Unit E-5 Report

In the last 15 years, more of the growth has been in the unincorporated portion of the county. The incorporated areas of the county are home to 32% of the population, with 16% in Truckee, 13% in Grass Valley, and 3% in Nevada City. The remaining 68% live in outlying unincorporated areas. Incorporated

Unincorporated

Total County

120,000

98,764 

100,000

Dept of Finance, Demographic Research Unit E-5 Report 78,510  67,146 http://www.dof.ca.gov/research/demographic/reports/ 64,392

80,000

51,645 

40,000

19,888 

42,832

17,789  20,000 13,505 4,284 1900

65,560

60,283

60,000

0

97,225 

92,033 

27,641

31,618

31,665

2000

2010

2014

18,227 11,919

8,813

7,969 1950

1980

1990

Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit E-5 Report

 

In the deecade from 2000 2 to 2010 0, Nevada County C popuulation grew by 7%, connsiderably leess than the 40% grow wth in Placeer and 20% in Yuba cou unties. In thee past 3 year ars, however, all of the ccomparison counties have seen siignificantly less l growth than t in the pprevious deccade. Popu ulation

Nevada Butte El Dorad do Mendociino Napa Placer Sutter Tehama Yuba

Total Pop P Estima ated 2014 4 98,893 224,241 183,087 87,869 141,667 371,649 95,847 63,067 73,966

Ethniciity

>65 Yrs 23% 17% 17% 18% 17% 17% 14% 18% 11%

% Pop Change 2010 – 2014 .1% 1.9% 1.1% 0% 3.8% 6.7% 1.2% -.6% 2.5%

White 86% 74% 79% 67% 55% 75% 49% 70% 57%

Hisp panic 9% 15% 12% 24% 33% 13% 30% 24% 27%

Asiaan 11% 44% 44% 22% 88% 77% 166% 11% 77%

Africaan Nativee American Americaan 11% 1% % 22% 2% % 11% 0% % 11% 6% % 22% 1% % 22% 1% % 22% 2% % 11% 3% % 44% 3% %

Other 2% 3% 4% 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2%

http://quick kfacts.census.go ov/qfd/states/06 6/06007.html

C has the highest percentage p of o residents over 65 yeaars of age, aand also has less ethnic Nevada County variation n than compaarison countties. There are a fewer ressidents undeer the age off 30 in Nevaada County (30%) th han statewid de (43%). In addition to simply being a greeat place too retire, the economic downturn n accelerated d the trend towards t an older o populaation as the high unempployment typpical of the “Great Recession” R caaused young ger people with w families to seek empployment in urban areass. With the recent im mprovement in the Coun nty’s unemplloyment, thee attractiveneess of this arrea as a greaat place for young families will continue c to in ncrease.

60-74 Yrs

75 5+ Yrrs 0-14 Yrs

45-59 9 Yrs

Age 0-14 15-29 30-44 45-59 60-74 75+ Total

15-29 Y Yrs 30-44 Yrs

Pop pulation 14,690 15,084 15,281 24,155 20,704 8,676 98,509

United Statess Census-Fact Finder F – Ameriican Fact Findeer, 2013 data

 

% Poopulation 14.9% 15.3% 15.5% 24.5% 21% 8.8% 100%

Educa ation The welll educated d population n of Nevad da County is i related to o the variety y of top-notch schools, and several higher educcation options w the county, or within eaasy either within commuting distance. More Neevada Countty residents have attended college or o pursued or o attained degrees d (73% %), compared d to the state aveerage (60% %). Furtherm more, consideerably fewerr people livin ng th in the co ounty have less l than a 9 grade lev vel of educaation (2%), compared to the staate overall (10%). This perfformance is ble to the co onsistently high h quality of attributab schools in the County y.

Ed ducation Coompleted Nevada County

(+25Yrs off Age)

Statewide

Lesss than 9th Graade

2%

10%

9th- 12th grade, nno diploma

4%

9%

Highh School diploma/GED

21%

21%

Som me College, noo degree

30%

22%

Assoociates degreee

11%

8%

Bachhelor's degreee Gradduate or profeessional degrree

21%

19%

11%

11%

100%

100%

Totaal

United d States Censuss-Fact Finder – American Factt Finder

C has a variety of grade g K-12 schools, s andd two Sierra C College cam mpuses locateed in Grass Nevada County Valley an nd Truckee. K-12 enrolllment peakeed in the midd-2000s, andd has declinned steadily since, with enrollment at 12,354 4 in 2013-1 14. As previiously menttioned, the eeconomic downturn cauused many young faamilies to move m to urb ban areas in n search of employmennt. With thee improvem ment in the economy y this trend iss expected to o slow or rev verse. Thesee figures incllude charter schools. Ann additional 3,950 stu udents are en nrolled in th he 11 Tahoee Truckee scchools, whicch are part oof the Placerr Office of Education. Mirroring g a national trend, chartter school atttendance haas increased in recent years, with atttendance in western county c climb bing from 3,,298 in 2008 8/09 to 4,5566 in 2013-144. Three chaarter schoolss operate in Truckee. With the grrowing numb ber of charteer schools, annd the manyy traditional school optioons, parents in the Co ounty have ch hoices as to the educatio onal experiennce that is riight for theirr children. K-12 Enrolllment

1996‐97 1997‐98 1998‐99 1999‐00 2000‐01 2000 01 2001‐02 2002‐03 2003‐04 2004‐05 2005‐06 2006‐07 2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 2009 10 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14

16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0

California Department off Education

Kinderrgarden G Grade 1 G Grade 2 G Grade 3 G Grade 4 G Grade 5 G Grade 6 G Grade 7 G Grade 8 G Grade 9 Grrade 10 Grrade 11 Grrade 12

Enrolllment by G Grade

0

5 500 1000 1500 0 2000 2500

Educatioon Data Partnerrship www.ed-d data.k12.ca.us

 

Library Services The Nevada County Library provides public library services from its three branches in Nevada City, Grass Valley, and Truckee and its two stations in Penn Valley and Bear River. The Friends of the Nevada County Library provide service from the Doris Foley Library for Historical Research in partnership with the County Library. A voter approved sales tax measure in 2002 provides a one-eighth cent sales tax to fund County libraries. The Friends of the Library and Truckee Friends have been instrumental in raising needed funds for the libraries and they, with other volunteers, have contributed over 18,300 volunteer hours annually. This voter approved revenue and community involvement helps support the robust library programs available here. Of the six comparison counties, Nevada County has the highest circulation per capita (7.57) and the second highest spending per capita ($24.12) behind Placer County. Grass Valley Royce Branch Library

Technology is an increasingly important tool in the Library System. From March 2014 through February of 2015, the community downloaded over 25,000 eBooks and/or audio books, an 80% increase over the same period last year and the high demand continues to increase. In the 2013-2014 fiscal year, the Helling Library saw 31,739 individual uses of library public computers and laptops – a 186% increase over the previous fiscal year. A Collaborative Technology Center opened in the Helling Library in August of 2013 and added approximately 2,000 square feet of space dedicated to technology and community development, including state of the art computers/devices, a 3-D printer, videography equipment and meeting and classroom areas.

County Nevada County Butte County Mendocino County Placer County Sutter County Tehama County Yuba County

Total Circulation 733,985 980,966 497,754 1,311,556 353,414 140,655 134,678

$ Spent Per Capita

Open Hours Per Year

$24.12 $11.43 $23.57 $30.53 $12.82 $7.77 $4.31

8,648 9,880 10,443 17,592 4,614 2,853 1,778

California State Library - http://www.library.ca.gov/lds/librarystats.html

 

Circulation Per Capita 7.57 4.43 5.64 6.9 3.69 2.21 1.83

Program Attendance per Capita 0.21 0.16 0.14 0.17 0.99 0.15 0.05

Arts and Culture Nevada County is the creative pulse of the Sierra Nevada, offering an array of experiences, including concerts, film festivals, dance performances, poetry readings, studio tours and galleries. The county also has numerous venues for performing arts, many of which are historic settings.

Economic Impact of Arts in Nevada County * * * *

247 full-time equivalent jobs $8.6 million regional economic benefit $340,000 in State government tax revenues $320,000 in Federal income tax revenues

  

http://ncerc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/NCArts-Report-March2014.pdf

The arts have a large economic impact on the County. In 2010, Nevada County Arts showed that among the 12 largest Arts organizations, the economic benefit to the area was over $8 million and the number of full and part time jobs was 247 making the Arts the 7th largest employment sector in 2010. The Arts matter to Nevada County and the community understands their value to quality of life here and to the vibrancy of the local economy. Nevada Theater (1865), California’s oldest theater building

Historical Legacy The extensive Native American, pioneer, railroad and mining history of the Nevada County can be explored at various locations. Nevada County was at the heart of the California Gold Rush, which drew scores of migrants from around the world, reshaping California and the Nation. The recent release of an interactive web-map guiding users to the many registered historical landmarks in the area represents a modern approach to appreciating our rich historical legacy.  Museum and Historic Site Highlights *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * 

   Bridgeport Covered Bridge    Empire Mine State Park Donner State Park and Museum Malakoff Diggins State Park Searls Historic Library Nevada County Narrow Gauge Museum North Star Mining Museum Saint Joseph’s Cultural Center North Star House

 

Criminal Justice Nevada County is a low crime county. In 2013, the County had the lowest felony rate per capita of the comparison counties and the second lowest overall crime rate. This low crime rate is attributable to the innovative and collaborative approach to criminal justice taken by local agencies and community partners. Our public safety agencies, human service agencies and non-profits meet regularly to strategize and coordinate service delivery, to the point where Nevada County’s recidivism rate (the rate of new crime commission) for AB109 probationers is just 16% compared to 30% across the state. These efforts to stop the “revolving door” have a direct and positive impact on the crime rate. Nevada County Adult and Juvenile Arrests Per 1000 Residents All ages, both genders, 2013 County Population Felony Misdemeanor Drug Nevada 98,262 8.9 19.3 3.4 Butte 222,420 13.3 35.9 5.0 El Dorado 181,542 11.1 21.1 3.6 Mendocino 87,471 18.4 37.9 6.2 Napa 140,580 12.7 19.8 2.9 Placer 367,339 11.7 15.5 3.9 Sutter 95,287 12.4 26.1 2.5 Tehama 63,130 24.8 37.8 10.6 Yuba 73,361 17.4 33.7 3.2

Total 28.3 49.3 32.2 56.3 32.9 27.3 39.9 62.9 51.2

http://oag.ca.gov/crime/cjsc/stats/arrests

Sheriff

The largest player in the local public safety arena in terms of budget as well as community footprint is the Nevada County Sherif’s Office. The largest unit in the Sheriff's Office is the uniformed Patrol Division, based primarily in Western Nevada County, with an additional substation in Truckee. The Sheriff’s Office has local correctional facilities in Nevada City and Truckee, and assists in court security. In addition, all three incorporated cities have police forces. The Nevada County Sheriff’s office operates a centralized Dispatch unit that handles dispatch for the cities and unincorporated area.

Probation Probation Caseloads 2013 County

As an integral part of the criminal justice system, Probation protects our community by promoting responsible behavior and offender accountability; providing objective, accurate information and recommendations to the Court; operating safe secure juvenile facilities and programs; and partnering with the community to provide direct services to offenders, families and victims. 

Nevada Butte El Dorado Mendocino Napa Placer Sutter Tehama Yuba

Felony 409 251 1,000 717 829 2,281 833 570 669

Misdemeanor 148 1,255 126 101 1,199 709 2 42 64

http://oag.ca.gov/crime/cjsc/stats/adult-probation

 

Total 557 1,506 1,126 818 2,028 2,990 835 612 733

District Attorney  The Nevada County District Attorney has offices in both Nevada City and Truckee. The District Attorney's Office reviews investigations conducted by law enforcement agencies, participates in joint investigations or, when appropriate, conducts their own investigation. The attorneys make filing decisions regarding criminal complaints, and handle felony, misdemeanor and juvenile delinquency cases at all stages of prosecution. The District Attorney’s office is a major partner in keeping Nevada County’s crime rates low, working closely with the Sheriff, Probation Office and Superior Courts. Comparison of Selected Crime Levels per 1000 residents, 2013 Type of Crime Violent Property Drug Sex Offense Other Felony Total

Nevada County 1.8 1.7 3.4 .1 1.6 8.6

Butte County

El Dorado County

Mendocino County

Placer County

Sutter County

Tehama County

Yuba County

2.8 2.9 5.1 .1 1.5 12.4

2.5 1.9 3.6 .2 2.3 10.5

5.1 3.5 6.2 .3 2.4 17.5

1.9 3.3 3.9 .2 1.9 11.2

3.5 3.5 2.5 .2 2.0 11.7

3.8 4.6 10.6 .2 4.7 23.9

5.5 5.0 3.2 .5 2.1 16.3

State of CA DOJ http://oag.ca.gov/crime/cjsc/stats/arrests

Superior Court The Superior court consists of six judges and one commissioner. The primary courthouse is located in Nevada City and the court maintains a branch in Truckee. Both locations are full-jurisdiction courts processing all case types. Since 1998, the largest funding sources for court operations have been the State Trial Court Trust Fund, state and federal grant funding and a small amount of locally generated revenue. While the Court is an independent state entity, it works closely with county departments to provide civil and criminal justice services in our community. Nevada County ranks third lowest in number of jury trials but is fourth highest of the counties in total criminal filings.

County

Judicial Criminal Positions Filings

Civil Filings

Nevada

23

7.6

17,936

1,831

Butte

61

14

31,274

3,788

El Dorado

56

9

22,010

3,184

Mendocino

21

8.4

17,436

1,693

Napa

38

8.0

19,295

2,325

Placer

78(i)

16.5

37,840

7,036

Sutter

19

5.3

15,575

1,780

6

4.3

15,295

1,503

19

5.3

14,389

1,380

Tehama Nevada County Courthouse (Superior Court of California)

Jury Trials

Yuba

http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/2014-Court-StatisticsReport.pdf (i): incomplete data received.

 

Health and Wellness According to an annual study conducted by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Nevada County is ranked the eleventh healthiest county in California, and third in the State for Quality of Life. The Rankings consider factors that affect people’s health within the four categories of health behavior, clinical care, social and economic factors, and physical environment.

Health and Wellness Measures Health % Pop Outcomes % Overweight Immunization Uninsured Rank / Obese Rates Nevada 17% 11 18% 72.60% Butte 19% 42 24% 87.24% El Dorado 13% 7 21% 90.30% Mendocino 22% 35 24% 81.19% Napa 18% 13 24% 93.49% Placer 13% 2 23% 86.40% Sutter 20% 27 28% 90.44% Tehama 20% 47 27% 93.82% Yuba 19% 48 28% 95.89%

Although Nevada County does well http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/about-project in the areas of morbidity and www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/immunize/ physical environment, it has the lowest rate of children being fully immunized prior to kindergarten entrance, and the highest rate of parents opting out for personal belief exemptions. The percentage of fully immunized kindergarteners in Nevada County has declined from 78% in 2005 to 72.6% in 2014. The immunization rate for the state overall was 90.4% in 2014. Among the comparison counties, Nevada County ranks fourth in percent of population in poverty. In 2013 the Federal poverty level for a family of four was $23,550. For the same period the median household income for Nevada County was $57,353, which was slightly lower than the median statewide household income ($61,094). People living at or below the poverty line tend to have a lower health status, with fewer resources to get sufficient medical care and incur other related expenditures.  

% of Poplation in Poverty    

Placer

9%

  El Dorado

9%

Napa

10%

Nevada

12%

Sutter

17%

Tehama

20%

Mendocino

20%

Butte

20%

Yuba

22% 0%

5%

10%

15%

US Census - http://factfinder2.census.gov/

 

20%

25%

Safety Net Programs Health and Human Service Programs are often called “Safety Net” Programs; they help individuals and families with basic needs such as food, housing, and medical care. These programs include CalWorks; Food Stamps; the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) program; Adult Protective Services, Child Protective Services, Child Support Services and more. Nevada County continues to be a relatively low “welfare” county compared with most of its central valley and north state counterparts, although the downturn in the economy has led some residents who were previously self-sufficient to seek support. The percentage of residents applying for and receiving support in Nevada County through safety net programs increased significantly during the recession. One mitigating factor is that Nevada County also has a high performing Child Support department, which both helps to recoup some of the costs associated with safety net programs, but also provides helps families avoid the need to apply for service in the first place by ensuring both parents are engaged in supporting the family. Along with the recession, the largest single factor affecting safety net caseloads in recent years is the Affordable Care Act. All comparison counties show a marked increase in Medi-Cal enrollment this year vs. last year as a direct result of the lowering of eligibility requirements. Health and Human Services – 2015 Data # of residents enrolled in Medi-Cal Nevada Butte El Dorado Mendocino Napa Placer Sutter Tehama Yuba

14,655 53,558 27,338 27,097 22,897 49,708 29,099 18,794 19,429

Total Open Cases 1/14 Cal FRESH

% of Population on CalWORKS

Foster Care Placed Out of Home

3,970 15,024 6,808 6,498 3,393 8,468 5,289 4,401 5,661

1.4% 3.6% 1.3% 3.4% 1.0% 1.0% 4.0% 4.3% 5.6%

94 485 285 236 140 304 132 208 165

Nevada County Departments of Social Services and Child Support Services

 

 

Child Support Caseload 3,539 11,269 5,856 4,421 3,886 8,853 4,746 4,222 4,344

Percent of Current Child Support Collected 76.0% 67.2% 69.2% 66.6% 69.3% 66.7% 67.4% 64.6% 66.9%

having the second lowest staffing per 1000 residents, and the lowest expense per capita. There are six Elected County Officials; the District Attorney, Sheriff, Assessor, Auditor/Controller, Treasurer/Tax Collector, and the Registrar of Voters/Clerk-Recorder.

2. Government Nevada City, Grass Valley, Truckee, and nine unincorporated areas make up Nevada County. The five member Board of Supervisors is the legislative and executive body of county government and also serves as the governing body of the Nevada County Sanitation District. In addition, Board members represent the County on numerous intergovernmental bodies. In its legislative duties the Board adopts ordinances, resolutions and rules and is responsible for seeing that all Federal and State mandated functions are properly discharged. The board also adopts the County budget and the fiscally conservative policies that helped Nevada County whether the recession are evident in the chart at right, with the County

Selected Measures of Government

Nevada Butte El Dorado Mendocino Napa Placer Sutter Tehama Yuba

Staff / Incorporated 1000 Expense Cities/Towns Residents per Capita 3 7.9 2,023 5 10.4 2,118 2 10.2 2,786 4 15.9 2,685 5 9.9 3,210 6 7.5 2,147 2 9.6 2,484 3 13.5 2,638 2 12.2 2,564

Source: County Budgets and US Census Data

 

The Board appoints a County Executive Officer (CEO) to direct the planning, operations and management of the County, and the CEO appoints department heads over areas in which they have special knowledge, ability, and expertise. Nevada County does not provide direct fire protection or parks and recreation services. These services are provided by special districts within the county.

3. Housing and Land Use County Nevada Butte El Dorado Mendocino Napa Placer Sutter Tehama Yuba

Square Miles* 958 1,636 1,708 3,506 748 1,407 602 2,949 632

Population per Sq. Mile 103 137 107 25 189 264 159 21 117

*http://www.dof.ca.gov/research/demographic

Nevada County is the 15th smallest county in California, measured in square miles with a total land area of 958 square miles. Population density is the number of residence per square mile and as population increases so does the county’s density. The population density in the County is 103 residents per square mile, putting it amongst the lowest of comparison counties and well below the overall California population density of 249 people per square mile.

Assessed Secured Property Values and Taxes

Year 1997 2000 2005 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Total Assessed Value ($Bill.) 4.2 7.7 10.3 16.6 15.4 15.0 14.8 14.9

Assessed Value per Capita $ 46,997 83,481 105,176 168,629 155,736 154,420 152,744 153,833

Property Tax Per Capita $ 810 873 1,052 1,686 1,557 1,544 1,527 1,538

% Parcels in Prop 8 Status 12% 1% 0% 31% 29% 26% 26% 23%

Avg Assessed Value of Home 144,876 183,540 285,356 291,927 296,495 292,488 293,636 309,783

Nevada County CAFR /Nevada County Assessor

The assessed value of Nevada County real estate increased from $4.2 billion in 1997, to a high of $14.9 billion in 2014. As was typical across the nation during the “great recession” the County saw a precipitous drop in values after the bubble of the mid-2000s. While the recovery has occurred more slowly in California’s rural areas than it has in the coastal cities, a healthy increase in total valuation occurred in Nevada County in 2014. Both assessed value per capita and average home value have increased, reflecting the rebound in the real estate market. State law allows for temporary property tax reductions (Prop 8) when values decline. Prop 8 properties were virtually non-existent before the decline, then spiked to a peak of 31% of all properties in the County in 2010. The percentage has trended downwards from there and will continue to go down as the economy recovers.  

Nevada County - Types of Housing County  Single Family Multi-Family Mobile Home Other Housing Total % of Total

Nevada City 1,067 265 0 0 1,332 3%

Grass Valley 3,604 2,924 370 19 6,917 13%

Truckee Unincorp. 10,926 28,647 1,545 575 442 2,053 41 184 12,954 31,459 24% 60%

Total 44,244 5,309 2,865 244 52,662 100%

% of Total 84% 10% 5% 1% 100%

http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml

An estimated 84% of county dwellings are single-family units, and 10% are multi-family units. An estimated 60% of all housing is in the unincorporated area of the County, with Truckee representing the most housing units among the incorporated cities/town, at 24 %. According to Counting California Report (2000), 14% of housing units in Nevada County were second homes at that time. Second home ownership is especially prevalent in Truckee, a popular resort community in the Tahoe region.

 

The number of building permits issued by the county declined dramatically during the economic downturn, mirroring state and nationwide trends. Total permits have recovered significantly since the 2009-2010 low, but remain below the prerecession highs.

Housing Total housing units is the number of singleand multiple-family dwellings, mobile homes, and other dwelling units situated within a given jurisdiction. A housing unit may be the permanent residence for a household, a seasonal or second home, or vacant pending sale or rental. The total number of housing units in Nevada County was 52,662 units in 2014, with a median sales price of $335,000, which places Nevada County in the higher value range among comparison counties. 

2700 2500 2300 2100 1900 1700 1500

200 150 100 50 0

Total Permits

New Residential Permits

Total Permits

Building Permits

New Residential Permits

Nevada County Building Department

January 2015 Median Sales Price 335,000 199,000 349,000 280,000 515,000 365,000 145,000 204,000 180,000

Total Housing Units 52,662 96,326 88,228 40,434 54,851 153,886 27,023 33,908 27,734

County Nevada Butte El Dorado Mendocino Napa Placer Tehama Sutter Yuba

Owner Occupied Units est. 29,768 51,005 50,797 19,727 29,969 93,656 15,775 18,898 14,356

Vacancy Rate 20.4% 10.2% 21.2% 14% 9.4% 13.4% 12.1% 6.7% 13.2%

RealtyTrac http://www.realtytrac.com/statsandtrends/markettrends/ http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml

Comparing data over the last couple years; foreclosures in Nevada County are trending lower, indicating a slowdown in distressed properties entering the market. In 2014-15 foreclosures averaged 21 per month vs 54 per month in 2013-14, and 120 per month in 2012-13. % of Total 2% 7% 29% 1% 61% 100%

Total Foreclosures 60 40 20

Nevada County Planning Department RealtyTrac http://www.realtytrac.com/statsandtrends/

 

Mar‐15

Feb‐15

Jan‐15

Dec‐14

Nov‐14

Oct‐14

Sep‐14

Aug‐14

Jul‐14

Jun‐14

May‐14

0 Apr‐14

Nevada County - Type of Land Use Commercial/Industrial Residential Agricultural & Timber Government Recreation/Forest/Open Space Total

Nevada County Broadband Current broadband speeds and County % of Population Statewide availability in the region still lag behind with Broadband Ranking access* non-rural counties, but are equal to or Nevada 99.3% 38 above average in comparison to similar Butte 99.7% 30 peer rural Northern California Sierra El Dorado 99.6% 34 communities. As part of the Central Mendocino 95.6% 51 Napa 99.9% 24 Valley Next Generation Broadband Placer 99.9% 21 initiative, the Middle Mile project, a Sutter 100% 9 high speed fiber optic network is being Tehama 99.7% 32 built across 18 California counties, Yuba 100% 18 including passing through western *broadband is defined as download/upload speed >3 Mbs / >.7 Mbs http://www.broadbandmap.gov/rank/ Nevada County. The network will be installed in key County areas and the infrastructure will be used to leverage fiber optics in the greater community. Three community anchor institutions will be initially connected. The project will then be leveraged by local “Last Mile” and other commercial Internet providers. The project construction is mostly completed with hopes of network activation in late 2015. A local Internet Service Provider is working on plans to build a 1Gbs fiber to the home/business “Last Mile” network in western Nevada County. Local Wireless Internet Service Providers continue to slowly build out their networks and cover more rural homes. Commercial fiber based business services are also slowly expanding from the major providers such as AT&T and Comcast, but are limited to the higher density city centric locations. Rural cellular data coverage is slowly expanding with the two major local providers, Verizon and AT&T, adding a new tower over the past year, with several other new towers currently being planned. The Truckee area’s cable TV provider Suddenlink Communications announced plans to update their infrastructure to offer 1Gbs broadband services over the next two years. They also performed upgrades this past year that can now provide 50Mbs service to Donner Summit area residents.

Truckee

Nevada City Grass Valley

 

Utilities % Pop. w/Treated Wastewater

County

Recycling Target*

Recycling Actual*

Nevada City

99%

11.7

7.4

Grass Valley

100%

7.2

3.4

Truckee 91% 10.7 Unincorporated 19% 3.0 *recycling is pounds per day per person

5.7 3.6

Nevada County, Grass Valley, Nevada City and Truckee departments of Public Works

Nevada County ensures the safe and reliable disposal solid waste and recycling through a contract with Waste Management. The Sanitation District provides wastewater treatment in the unincorporated areas. Currently the majority of the unincorporated areas do not have treated wastewater, but a pending collaborative project is leveraging grant funding to bring wastewater treatment to the Penn Valley area. This project will increase the percentage of the population with access to treated water.

Agriculture The total value of Nevada County’s 2013 agricultural crop production was $23,206,300. This amount represents an increase of $6,418,300 from the 2012 crop value, with the largest increase in Cattle & Calves ($2,288,200). Nursery products show decreased revenue of $14,500. This decrease is primarily from lower nursery sales, although some of the difference also resulted from lower Christmas tree sales. Retail nursery production was significantly down which growers attributed to the continued downturn in the economy. The total acres harvested and the yield per acre increased resulting in an additional 380 tons of production, which overcame the decrease in the price per unit.  Top 6 Agricultural Crops

 

Nursery Stock Fruit & Vegetables

 

2013 Total = $22,068,500 2012Total = $16,221,500

Wine Grapes

     

Timber

  Pasture/Rangeland   Cattle & Calves   http://www.mynevadacounty.com/nc/cda/agcomm/docs/Crop%20Reports/Crop%20Report%202013.pdf

 

4. Transportation

Roadways in Nevada County

There are 1,099 miles of roads and highways in Nevada County, including 154 miles of unpaved roads in unincorporated areas. Transportation in and around Nevada County includes highway, rail, air, bus, and increasingly, cycling and pedestrian. In 2014-15, the Nevada County Department of Public Works prepared and chipsealed over 16 miles of roadways and brushed 73 miles in the Vegetation Control Program.

Maintained by:

Bridges

Road/Hwy Miles

City/Town

20

240

County

77

562

State

47

129

Federal Other State Agencies

0

143

0

44

Private

0

2061

144

3,179

Total

CA DOT and Nevada County Department of Public Works

A recent report on California road conditions ranked Nevada County third in the state in terms of pavement condition. Nevada County is one of only 4 counties with “good” pavement condition, and does significantly better than any other rural county in the State. In large part this is due to passage of Measure F in 1996, unique to Nevada County, which commits a portion of discretionary revenue to road improvement. This funding stream has allowed Nevada County to be one of the few to maintain good pavement condition despite the recession.

http://www.savecaliforniastreets.org/read‐the‐report/

Highway Safety Data  

Nevada County had 17 fatal accidents in 2012 which is the fourth lowest amount in the comparison counties. We fare worse at 7th when controlled for vehicle miles travelled. Part of this is normal fluctuation. Due to the small numbers involved, a few accidents can skew the fatality rate drastically year to year.

Nevada Butte El Dorado Mendocino Napa Placer Sutter Tehama Yuba

Vehicle Miles Fatal Fatal Accidents Travelled Accidents/ (millions) VMT 2012 17 3.1 5.5 24 4.6 5.2 23 4.4 5.2 24 3.1 7.7 7 2.9 2.4 27 9.6 2.8 8 2.3 3.5 10 2.4 4.2 19 1.8 10.6

www.ots.ca.gov/media_and_research/Rankings/default.asp www.chp.ca.gov/switrs /

 

5. Working and Doing Business Nevada County has over 11,000 commuters going out of the county for work, and nearly 6,000 coming into the county. The top destination out for work is Placer County (6,170), followed by Sacramento County (1,732), and Washoe County, Nevada (844). Commute times range from 30 minutes to Placer, 2 hours to Washoe, and up to 3.75 hours to parts of the Sacramento Valley. Commuting has an economic impact on the community because residents may be spending time and money in other locations rather than locally, impacting both family life and local business activity.   Nevada County - Commuters Out/In for Work Other 1,111 1,073 Bay Area 810 152 Sac. Valley 230 104 Yuba 507 476 Washoe 844 1,426 Sacramento 1,732 677 Placer -

6,170

2,000

Commute Times (Hrs) Various 2.50 3.75 .75 2.00 1.00 .50

2,073 4,000

Out Commute Total = 11,404

6,000

8,000

10,000

In Commute Total = 5,981

http://www.census.gov/population/metro/data/other.html

 

Income and Sales Nevada County ranks 4th in per capita of the comparison counties and median household income and 7th in sales per capita. These numbers are impacted by the sales tax outflow the county experiences as consumers are drawn to the more urban surrounding counties for many shopping needs.  

County

Nevada Butte El Dorado Mendocino Napa Placer Sutter Tehama Yuba

Per Capita Income

32,346 23,787 34,884 23,306 34,795 34,886 23,602 20,439 19,244

Median Household Income

57,353 41,332 64,459 43,469 70,443 72,725 50,408 41,924 44,902

Sales Tax Rate

7.63% 7.50% 7.50% 7.63% 8.00% 7.50% 7.50% 7.50% 7.50%

Total Taxable Sales ($Bill.)

Taxable Sales per Capita

1.2 2.9 1.9 1.3 2.9 7.7 1.5 0.8 0.5

11,810 12,937 10,340 14,910 20,880 21,028 15,406 12,749 6,863

http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmrk Ca State Board of Equalization, Taxable Sales in California by County, 2013

 

 

Employment by Sector  # Employed

Industry Goods Producing Nat Res/Mining/Construct Manufacturing Service-Providing Trade, Transport & Utilities Information Financial Activities Professional & Business Svc Education and Health Svc Leisure & Hospitality Other - Unclassified Government Federal State Local Total/Average

Avg Weekly Wage

% Empl.

257 1,408

1% 6%

$890 $1,058

4,646 302 1,469 2,085 4,718 4,615 1,324

18% 1% 6% 8% 16% 18% 5%

$617 $983 $962 $966 $804 $379 $920

358 123 4,844 26,149

1% 1% 19% 100%

$1,214 $904 $967 $889

CA EDD, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, Annual 2013 http://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/qcew/CEW-Select.asp

Employment by sector paints a picture of economic health by industry and of the overall County. The Service-Providing sector leads in the number of people employed (72%), followed by Government (21%), and Goods Producing (7%) sectors. Average weekly wages range from $379 in Leisure and Hospitality to $1,214 in Federal Government. This year the number of jobs increased from 25,836 to 26,149. The increase of jobs in the service-providing and government industries led to a slight .5% increase in the Average Weekly Wage.

Nevada County’s vibrant community, abundant natural beauty, location and natural resources provide a competitive advantage for employee attraction. Nevada County’s top businesses include technology, ski-resort and other lodgings, grocery stores, schools, and other service providers.   Nevada County - Number of Establishments by Industry Service Providing

2,643

Education & Hlth Svc

710

Goods Producing

638

Trade, Transport, Utilities

485

Professional & Business Svc

483

Construction

465

Leisure & Hospitality

Total = 5,814 Establishments

276

Local Gov't

114 -

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

CA Employment Development Department, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, Annual 2013 http://www.labormarketinfo.edd.gov/qcew/CEW-Select.asp

 

3,000

Unemployment is the estimated number of people who are actively seeking work and are not working at least one hour per week for pay, and who are not selfemployed. The rate of unemployment reached its peak in 2010 and has steadily declined as the economy rebounds.

Unemployment Nevada County

Sacramento Region

State

14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0%

In January 2015, an estimated 3,020 workers in Nevada County were unemployed, making up 6.2% of the local labor force.

1990 2000 2005 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 CA EDD, Labor Market Information, Unemployment Rates. (See URL next chart)

This was an increase from 4.8% in 2005, but a decrease from the 2011 rate of 10.6% and the 2014 rate of 7.3%. Nevada County’s unemployment rate tends to be below the rate for the Sacramento Region, and has been consistently lower than the California average since 1990, while generally following statewide trends. Nevada County ranks third lowest in unemployment among the comparison counties.  

Unemployment Rates 2015

 

14

13.1

12

11.1 9.4

10

8.4

8 6

5.7

5.7

6.2

6.6

7

4 2 0

CA EDD, Labor Market Information, Unemployment Rates. http://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/cgi/dataanalysis/areaselection.asp?tablename=labforce

 

Nevad N a County Go overnm ment  Orgaanization   

 

 

Board of Supervi sors  

   

Executive O Officer   County E

     

  Risk Managgement 

  Eleective Officces  Assessor  Au uditor‐Contro oller 

¾ ¾

Appoiintive Officces  Comm munity  Development Agency  ¾

¾ ¾

Code Co ompliance

C Clerk‐Recorde er 

Ag Comm missioner

Clerk‐Recorde er  Elections 

Farm A Advisor Building Inspection

D District Attorn ney  Victim/Witnesss  Fraud 

SSheriff‐Coroner  ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾

Plan nning

Animal Contro ol  Corrections  Court Securityy  Operations 

Treasurer‐Taax  Collector 

Public Works  ¾ ¾ ¾

Fleet and d Roads Sanitatio on District   Transit SServices 

Prob bation ¾

Juvenile e Hall

Public D Defender

 

                         

Environme ental Health  

 

 

 

                                     

Health & Hu uman  Services Aggency 

Clerk of tthe Board

Housing Proggrams

County  Counsel

Chhild Support SServices 

Comm missions,  Boards &  Comm mittees 

¾

¾

Collections

Social Servvices  ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾

Child & Adultt Protective  Services  Public Assistaance  Public Guardian  Veterans’ Serrvices 

Behavioral H Health Public Heealth Human Reso ources  Informatio on &  General Services ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾

Information Systems  Central Serv ices  Emergency SServices  Facilities Maanagement  Purchasing Airport 

Library

Revenues by Source

Revenues Taxes Licenses, Permits & Franchises Fines, Forfeitures, & Penalties Use of Money & Property Federal/State Intergovernmental Charges for Services Miscellaneous Revenues Other Financing Sources Total Revenues

2015/2016 Budget

13/14 Actual

39,431,477 4,077,068 3,358,111 4,680,200 78,887,865 16,892,878 3,796,940 32,997,897 184,122,436

14/15 Adopted

14/15 Estimated

40,969,536 3,781,181 2,880,087 4,841,207 85,382,691 17,345,529 2,333,981 36,084,693 193,618,905

41,583,887 4,104,283 3,084,358 4,758,219 84,579,018 17,230,283 2,917,984 33,646,961 191,904,993

Miscellaneous Revenues, 1.40%

15/16 Proposed

43,594,029 4,151,534 3,100,238 5,263,033 85,294,495 17,712,415 2,734,364 33,707,768 195,557,876

15/16 Adopted

43,594,029 4,151,534 3,100,238 5,263,033 85,294,495 17,712,415 2,734,364 33,707,768 195,557,876

Other Financing Sources, 17.24%

Charges for Services, 9.06% Taxes, 22.29%

Licenses, Permits & Franchises, 2.12% Federal/State Intergovernmental, 43.62%

Use of Money & Property, 2.69%

Fines, Forfeitures, & Penalties, 1.59%

General Fund Discretionary Revenues

However, approximately one-third is spent to leverage funding for programs with specific spending requirements, or to maintain State funding for some programs. The remainder funds programs not mandated by the State or Local Municipal Services such as Public Safety, Tax Collection, and Community Development.

The following chart provides an historical picture of General Fund Discretionary Revenues. Unlike other county funding, which is required to be spent on specific programs, these revenues are considered discretionary because they are available for the Board to allocate to various programs and services.

Fiscal Year

Property and Related Taxes

97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16

$12.86 $13.55 $14.42 $15.36 $16.45 $17.98 $19.16 $27.57 $30.76 $34.25 $36.46 $37.25 $37.63 $35.13 $33.79 $34.34 $34.67 $36.05 $38.03

Sales Taxes

$2.62 $2.80 $3.29 $3.49 $3.52 $3.37 $3.58 $3.53 $2.86 $3.65 $3.41 $2.79 $2.72 $2.78 $2.89 $3.01 $3.24 $3.30 $3.37

2015/2016 Budget

Franchise Fees

$0.38 $0.38 $0.39 $0.41 $0.80 $0.80 $0.86 $0.80 $0.82 $0.97 $1.01 $1.05 $1.03 $1.04 $1.04 $2.42 $2.57 $2.57 $2.57

Interest

$0.53 $0.69 $0.79 $1.34 $0.91 $0.58 $0.24 $0.34 $0.43 $0.83 $0.96 $0.39 $0.05 $0.09 $0.12 $0.03 $0.06 $0.08 $0.08

Motor Vehicle In-lieu

$0.99 $1.00 $1.18 $1.51 $1.56 $1.73 $0.18 $0.01 $0.00 $0.03 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.18 $0.04 $0.04 $0.04 $0.04 $0.04

Other

$1.23 $1.20 $1.58 $1.81 $1.36 $1.50 $1.60 $1.66 $2.20 $2.58 $2.19 $1.95 $2.13 $2.04 $1.70 $1.68 $1.71 $1.81 $2.11

Total

$18.61 $19.62 $21.65 $23.92 $24.60 $25.96 $25.62 $33.91 $37.07 $42.31 $44.03 $43.43 $43.56 $41.26 $39.58 $41.52 $42.29 $43.83 $46.20

(Expressed in millions)

Notes: (1) Increases in Taxes and reduction in Motor Vehicle In-lieu in 04/05 are due in part to State of California MVLF/Property Tax swap. (2) Increase in Franchise Fees 12/13 due to expanded agreement with Waste Management of Nevada County.

Discretionary Revenue Per Capita

105,000

Discretionary Revenue per capita

$426 100,000

population growth are projected to lead to continued increase in discretionary revenue per capita.

$348

$471

County Population

$444 $439 $441 $418

$427 $436

500

$451 450

$404

$376

400

Population

350 95,000

300 250

90,000

200 150

85,000

100 50

80,000

0 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16

Discretionary Revenue per Capita

The trend in County Discretionary Revenue per Capita increased from 03-04 to 04-05 reflecting the State of California MVLF/Property Tax Swap. From 04-05 to 07-08 the trend increased due in large part to property tax growth. A small reduction in population from 10/11 through 12/13 leads to slightly more revenue per capita. In 12/13 base property taxes declined but were offset by increased taxes related to Redevelopment Agency dissolution and franchise fees from an expanded solid waste contract with Waste Management of Nevada County. In 14/15 revenues increased, while population has remained flat, thus resulting in an increase in per capita revenue. In 15/16 continued recovery of revenue streams coupled with low

2015/2016 Budget

E Expendittures by Cost C Cattegory

Expenses E S Salaries & Ben nefits S Services & Su upplies O Other Chargess O Overhead Costt Allocation (A A87) C Capital Assets O Other Financin ng Uses I Interfund Activ vity C Contingency To otal Expenses

13/14 1 A Actual 74 4,184,678 44 4,871,707 0,991,594 40 6 6,205,556 4 4,065,098 32 2,297,908 8,575,287) (28 174 4,041,254

2015/20166 Budget

14/15 Adopted 83,586,829 52,119,507 42,113,203 6,846,547 7,824,283 37,026,680 (29,550,193)) 100,000 200,066,856

14/15 Estimateed 77,917,8 830 49,895,8 874 607 40,342,6 6,820,5 578 8,395,2 210 34,889,5 544 (30,531,6 626) 187,730,0 017

15//16 Prop posed 85,729,788 55,605,425 43,681,922 8,079,105 6,772,968 34,866,262 (33,588,039) 100,000 201,247,431

15/16 Adopted A 8 85,729,788 5 55,605,425 4 43,681,922 8,079,105 6,772,968 3 34,866,262 33,588,039) (3 100,000 20 01,247,431

Sallaries & Beenefits 42 2.60%

ncy Contingen 0.05%

Seervices & S Supplies 227.63%

Interrfund Activity y -16.69%

Other Finan ncing Uses 17.33% % Capital C Assetss 3.37%

Other Chargees 21.71%

Ov verhead Cost Allo ocation (A87) 4.01%

100,000,000 0

Saalaries & Beneefits

80,000,000 0 Seervices & Supp plies

60,000,000 0 40,000,000 0

Capital Assets

20,000,000 0 0 06/07

07/08

08/09

09 9/10

10/11 1

11/12

12/13

13/14

14/15 Esttimate

**Effective this year charges between b County y budgets havee been moved ffrom Services & Supplies to Other Chargess. This rreduces Servicees & Supplies on o the chart ab bove, and moree accurately refflects what the County pays ffor services andd supplies.

Expenditures by Function General Government Public Protection Public Ways & Facilities Health & Sanitation Public Assistance Education, Recreation & Culture Enterprise Internal Services

Public Ways & Facilities 6.88%

2015/2016 Budget

20,634,693 70,896,336 13,842,471 41,803,339 35,347,859 2,959,109 8,041,598 7,722,026 201,247,431

Education, Recreation & Culture 1.47%

Enterprise 4.00% General Government 10.25%

Public Protection 35.23% Health & Sanitation 20.77%

Public Assistance 17.56%

Internal Services 3.84%

General Government Clerk of the Board Annual Audit Services County Executive Office Assessor Auditor-Controller Treasurer/Tax Collector Purchasing Collections Other Fin. Sources & Uses Trial Court Funding Wildwood Estates Escrow Community Facilities Dist Provision for Contingency MVLF License Fees Building Debt Financing Legal Counsel Personnel Services Elections

10101 10102 10103 10201 10202 10203 10204 10205 10206 10207 10209 10210 10212 10213 10214 10301 10401 10501

Public Ways & Facilities 6.88%

2015/2016 Budget

1,159,468 32,026 1,288,096 2,602,667 1,616,519 1,133,850 303,670 269,727 (920,959) 1,431,848 140,560 137,957 100,000 1,910,351 919,031 1,038,479 1,243,463

Facilities Management Capital Facilities Projects Crim. Just.Temp Fac. Constr. Economic Development Assessment Appeals Board Info. & General Svcs Admin Ins.-Property & Casualty Risk Management Admin. Historical Landmarks Information Systems Geographic Info. Systems Surveyor Cable TV Services Probation Fire Insurance Claim Transit Self-Insurance Insurance - Worker's Comp. Other Debt Financing

Education, Recreation & Culture 1.47%

Enterprise 4.00%

10702 10801 10803 10902 11001 11003 11004 11005 11006 11007 11008 11009 11010 11011 11012 11015 11016

2,366,887 90,294 140,023 130,000 8,001 32,662 99,284 1,217 1,783,234 459,617 128,414 119,627 213 447,627 420,840 20,634,693

General Government 10.25%

Public Protection 35.23% Health & Sanitation 20.77%

Public Assistance 17.56%

Internal Services 3.84%

Public Protection

Court Security Grand Jury District Attorney Public Defender Child Support Services Conflict Indigent Defense Dispute Resolution 2011 Rlgn.-Low Level Offender/Parole 2011 Realignment-Adult PRCS 2011 Rlgn.-Trial Court Security 2011 Rlgn.-DA PRCS/Parole 2011 Rlgn.-Pub. Def. PRCS/Parole 2011 Rlgn.-Juv. Just. YOBG/Re-Entry Sheriff Services 2011 Rlgn.-Law Enforcement Serv. 2011 Rlgn.-Juvenile Justice LLESS Dispatch Services

Public Ways & Facilities 6.88%

2015/2016 Budget

20101 1,347,931 20102 110,923 20103 4,245,635 20107 2,130,859 20109 4,310,328 20111 489,690 20112 14,590 20113 1,461,275 20114 1,009,557 20115 855,000 20116 16,983 20117 16,983 20118 176,786 20201 14,792,538 20202 1,193,892 20203 458,645 20204 1,709,680

Corrections Inmate Medical Services Truckee Operations Juvenile Hall Probation Agriculture Services Building Inspection Weights & Measures Recorder Emergency Management Animal Control Fish & Wildlife CDA Administration Planning Code Compliance Public Safety Augment.

Education, Recreation & Culture 1.47%

Public Protection 35.23%

20301 20302 20304 20310 20320 20601 20602 20603 20701 20702 20704 20705 20707 20708 20709 20710

9,635,032 2,136,776 1,740,828 3,113,798 5,596,301 839,129 1,673,470 0 842,707 538,389 901,883 5,713 14,000 2,381,181 796,171 6,339,663 70,896,336

Enterprise 4.00% General Government 10.25%

Health & Sanitation 20.77%

Public Assistance 17.56%

Internal Services 3.84%

Public Ways & Facilities Dept. of Public Works Admin Roads-Administration Mitigation Funds CSA/PRD Roads Engineering Roads Maintenance Electrical Service Availability Roads Capital Improvements

2015/2016 Budget

30100 30101 30102 30103 30104 30107 30120 30154

1,533,474 857,283 558,488 419,357 7,429,200 3,969 3,040,700 13,842,471

Public Ways & Facilities 6.88%

Education, Recreation & Culture 1.47%

Enterprise 4.00% General Government 10.25%

Public Protection 35.23% Health & Sanitation 20.77%

Public Assistance 17.56%

Internal Services 3.84%

Health & Sanitation Public Health Admin. Health & Wellness Behavioral Health Admin. Children's Behavioral Health Alcohol & Drug Programs Emergency Medical & Prep. Environmental Health County Medical Services Pgm Adult Behavioral Health Public Health Client Services Social Services Rlgn.

Public Ways & Facilities 6.88%

2015/2016 Budget

40101 664,674 40102 1,371,261 40103 1,654,000 40104 7,154,221 40105 1,562,773 40107 586,677 40108 2,377,864 40109 0 40110 11,469,663 40114 3,153,400 40118 3,401,695

Behavioral Health Rlgn. Environmental Health Rlgn. Public Health Rlgn. Juvenile Hall Realignment Vector Control Health CCS Realignment Behavioral Health 2011 Rlgn. SB 163 Wraparound Program Solid Waste - Oil Solid Waste Contract Admin.

Education, Recreation & Culture 1.47%

40119 40120 40121 40122 40123 40129 40130 40140 40401 40402

4,258,330 156,262 212,485 67,180 130,009 0 3,208,345 208,221 -1,443 167,722 41,803,339

Enterprise 4.00% General Government 10.25%

Public Protection 35.23%

Health & Sanitation 20.77%

Public Assistance 17.56%

Internal Services 3.84%

Public Assistance Health & Human Serv. Admin. Social Services Admin. Adult Services Administration Child Welfare Services Admin. Eligibility Services Admin. Child Welfare Serv. Assistance Eligibility Services Assistance In-Home Supportive Services

Public Ways & Facilities 6.88%

2015/2016 Budget

50101 114,162 50102 500 50103 1,945,048 50104 3,785,331 50105 10,532,765 50204 4,447,476 50205 5,084,652 50206 2,471,510

Social Services 2011 Rlgn. Veterans Services Housing & Comm. Serv. Admin. Community Services Energy Assistance Homebuyer Assistance Housing Dev/Rehabilitation Victim/Witness Assistance Center

Education, Recreation & Culture 1.47%

50207 50501 50601 50602 50603 50604 50605 50608

3,383,654 281,364 60,695 276,133 0 397,234 2,249,218 318,117 35,347,859

Enterprise 4.00% General Government 10.25%

Public Protection 35.23% Health & Sanitation 20.77%

Internal Services 3.84% Public Assistance 17.56%

Education, Recreation & Culture Library Services Farm Advisor Conservation Recreation Mitigation Fees

60201 60301 60401 70101

Public Ways & Facilities 6.88%

2015/2016 Budget

2,787,543 50,117 22,784 98,665 2,959,109

Education, Recreation & Culture 1.47%

Enterprise 4.00% General Government 10.25%

Public Protection 35.23% Health & Sanitation 20.77%

Public Assistance 17.56%

Internal Services 3.84%

Enterprises Solid Waste -Western Solid Waste -Eastern Transit Services Airport

2015/2016 Budget

91001 91002 91003 91004

1,028,749 209,065 4,254,011 2,549,773 8,041,598

Public Ways & Facilities 6.88%

Education, Recreation & Culture 1.47%

Enterprise 4.00%

General Government 10.25%

Public Protection 35.23% Health & Sanitation 20.77%

Public Assistance 17.56%

Internal Services 3.84%

Internal Services Fleet Management Insurance - General Liability Insurance - Benefits Central Services Fleet Services

2015/2016 Budget

92001 92002 92003 92004 92005

2,138,130 1,130,590 1,129,301 564,200 2,759,805 7,722,026

Public Ways & Facilities 6.88%

Education, Recreation & Culture 1.47%

Enterprise 4.00% General Government 10.25%

Public Protection 35.23% Health & Sanitation 20.77%

Public Assistance 17.56%

Internal Services 3.84%

Historical Budget Trend The proposed final budget for 2015/16 totals $201,247,431. The total budget increase between 14/15 and 15/16 is projected to be $1,200,000. The following graph presents the historical trend in the County’s budget. It should be noted that in Fiscal Year 2002/03 GASB 34 required many additional funds to be budgeted, which were not budgeted in prior years. This increase was approximately $13,600,000. Again in 2004/05 Funds were added totaling approximately $5,600,000. Starting in 2012/13 the County began budgeting for 2011 Realignment, which results in increased budgets as

2015/2016 Budget

funds are deposited to special revenue funds, transferred out as expenses to operating funds, and then directly expended from those funds. Represented by the top shaded gray segments in the chart below, in 15/16 the impact of 2011 realignment is expected to be $16,600,000, versus $14,100,000 in 12/13.

201,247,431 200,066,856 183,473,716 181,357,659

190,904,907 185,369,835 180,121,519 181,992,153 168,717,365 172,850,342 154,221,478 148,936,420 138,163,964 135,162,863

184,647,431

183,666,856 169,373,716 169,257,659

02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 Note: The shaded area represents the effect of 2011 realignment.

C County Staffing S Relative R to t Popula ation Groowth

2015/2016 Budget

Totall Staffing 13/14 Actual

14/15 Adopted

144/15 Estim mated

15/16 A Adopted

782

783

7 84

778

Inncludes Sanitattion District

1,100

110,000

Population

100,000

Total Budgeteed Employees

1,000

90,000

900

80,000

800

70,000

700

60,000

600

50,000

500

Employees

County Population

Budget Summary by Fund

General Fund Fish and Game Road Fund Property Maint/Nusiance Capital Facilities Mitigation CDA Administration CDA Building Inspection CDA Environmental Health CDA Vector Control CDA Planning CDA Code Enforcement Environmental Health Penalties Child Support Services Forest Reserves Recycled Oil Block Grant Probation Fire Insurance Claim Wildwood Escrow Account Automated Warrants Nevada Co. Council on Alcohol Drug Education Trust Alcohol Education Program Emergency Med Srvcs Assmt E.P.P. - 1150 Domestic Violence Program Micrographics Administration SS# Truncation Children's Trust Automation Administration Public Library Civil Process Attachment Assessment Rural & Small County L.A.P. Comm. Fac. Dist. #1990-1 Wildwood Cable Inet & PEG WWW Mello-Roos Criminal Justice Temp SB678 Fund Correctional Training Correctional Training

2015/2016 Budget

0101 1113 1114 1119 1120 1123 1123 1123 1123 1123 1123 1124 1125 1130 1131 1137 1139 1141 1144 1145 1146 1147 1150 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1165 1168 1169 1171 1186

June 30, 2015 Projected Fund Balance 23,422,000 31,335 7,041,658 199,887 84,922 (639) 803,691 42,185 146,587 684,435 199,122 200,871 1,153,842 22,935 189 66 72,251 242,800 15,425 189,907 105,060 1,231 298 7,514 189,837 14,846 81,603 1,504,233 171,562 185,011 1,862,210 845,680

FY 15/16 Revenue 67,765,863 1,360 10,520,364 83,194 3,374 14,000 1,567,910 2,330,564 150,000 1,733,106 614,354 50,300 4,310,328 21,645 137,505 250 21,760 2,178 18,298 191,607 261,981 17,826 32,000 32,000 10,000 122,000 2,642,685 20,500 15,000 505,000 4,500

FY 15/16 Expense 67,648,828 5,713 12,422,731 157,211 14,000 1,673,470 2,330,564 130,009 2,056,101 638,960 47,300 4,310,328 22,784 (1,443) 137,500 53,370 2,031 18,298 191,607 261,981 17,826 39,514 31,809 10,000 162,074 2,787,543 104,878 53,625 522,007 137,957

FY 15/16 Net Change 117,035 (4,353) (1,902,367) (74,017) 3,374 (105,560) 19,991 (322,995) (24,606) 3,000 (1,139) 1,443 5 250 (31,610) 147 (7,514) 191 (40,074) (144,858) (84,378) (38,625) (17,007) (133,457)

June 30, 2016 Projected Fund Balance 23,539,035 26,982 5,139,291 125,870 88,296 (639) 698,131 42,185 166,578 361,440 174,516 203,871 1,153,842 21,796 1,632 71 72,501 211,190 15,572 189,907 105,060 1,231 298 190,028 14,846 41,529 1,359,375 87,184 146,386 1,845,203 712,223

1190 1268 1304 1322 1323 1324

69,673 42,185 81,279 1,071,511 26,500 22

71,100 200 143,738 383,501 24,540 40,000

70,200 140,023 271,873 29,229 40,000

900 200 3,715 111,628 (4,689) -

70,573 42,385 84,994 1,183,139 21,811 22

Budget Summary by Fund

Local Detention Facility Fund Vital Records Recorder-VRIP Inmate Welfare Fund Workers Compensation Wilson Family Trust Krea Spay & Neuter Program Animal Health Care Spay and Neuter Ward Welfare Fund DUI Lab Fees CDBG Re-use Misc Income Federal Asset Forfeiture Probation Asset Forfeiture Fingerprint Identification DA Asset Forfeiture DA Environmental Enforcement Public Safety Augmentation 1991 Realignment – HHSA 1991 Realignment – Juvenile Hall 1991 Realignment – Env. Health 2011 Realignment – HHSA 2011 Realignment – Dist. Attorney 2011 Realignment – Public Defender 2011 Realignment – Sheriff 2011 Realignment – Probation Dispute Resolution Mental Health Services Act Health & Human Services Agency Tobacco Education Housing & Community Services CALHOME Program Income USDA HPG Home Program Income CALHOME HOME NC Recreation Mitigation GV Recreation Mitigation TR Recreation Mitigation ESA Mitigation Fund

1333 1335 1336 1339 1350 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1369 1435 1450 1452 1453 1454 1457 1468 1480 1480 1480 1481 1482 1482 1482 1482 1486 1512 1589 1603 1607 1608 1610 1611 1614 1621 1626 1627 1628 1629

2015/2016 Budget June 30, 2015 Projected Fund Balance 2,334 21,195 45,689 303,847 316,206 210,285 122 28,358 18,633 5,510 4,557 71,859 757,084 2,255 264,937 20,142 12,615 107,952 8,737,778 74,836 201,792 807,799 478 145,957 883,953 3,090 5,286,768 3,297,999 33,822 46,386 218,639 4,260 495 108,367 3,673 52,816 6,895 48,331 2,275

FY 15/16 Revenue 90,000 11,100 7,900 127,750 242,400 2,000 150 100 3,080 28,000 52,500 11 31,200 90 60 6,339,663 6,088,787 45,000 33,890 6,591,999 16,983 16,983 3,506,275 1,608,698 11,500 4,153,320 51,867,043 150,150 1,683,335 61,750 25 87,100 46,025 333,334 4,611 4,908 1,669 3,969

FY 15/16 Expense 90,000 6,175 5,100 105,100 447,627 40,000 3,080 28,000 82,059 20,900 6,339,663 7,872,510 67,180 156,262 6,591,999 16,983 16,983 3,510,167 1,644,988 14,590 4,038,448 51,736,141 169,647 1,677,229 147,844 63,900 46,000 333,334 48,000 1,000 49,665 3,969

FY 15/16 Net Change 4,925 2,800 22,650 (205,227) (38,000) 150 100 (29,559) 11 10,300 90 60 (0) (1,783,723) (22,180) (122,372) (3,892) (36,290) (3,090) 114,872 130,902 (19,497) 6,106 (86,094) 25 23,200 25 (43,389) 3,908 (47,996) -

June 30, 2016 Projected Fund Balance 2,334 26,120 48,489 326,497 110,979 172,285 122 28,508 18,733 5,510 4,557 71,859 727,525 2,266 275,237 20,232 12,675 107,952 6,954,055 52,656 79,420 807,799 478 142,065 847,663 5,401,640 3,428,901 14,325 52,492 132,545 4,285 23,695 108,392 3,673 9,427 10,803 335 2,275

Budget Summary by Fund

Darkhorse Improvements Youth Offender Block Grant Law Enforcement Svcs - JJCPA Law Enforcement Services CDBG Rehab Revolving Loan Motor Vehicle License Fee CDBG Econ Dev Rev. Loan State DNA Act Anti-Drug Abuse/Gang Div State Asset Forfeiture CDBG STBG CDBG STBG CSBG-Nonprofits-Admin CDBG-GEN PTA Transit Self-Insurance Government Debt Service Airport Solid Waste - Western Solid Waste - Eastern Transit Services Fleet Management Fleet Services Central Services Vision Internal Service Unemployment Internal Service General Liability Dental Internal Service Various Mitigation Funds Various CSA/PRD Funds Fund Total Indep. Authority Fund Total

1630 1639 1640 1642 1645 1649 1650 1675 1679 1680 1700 1700 1711 1712 1785 3150 4116 4117 4118 4281 4290 4291 4332 4352 4355 4356 4498 Var. Var.

2015/2016 Budget June 30, 2015 Projected Fund Balance 1,001,962 53,951 375,451 261,378 205,260 132,611 490,005 59,266 102,751 (10,139) (10139) 13,405 43 78,042 266,095 (113,381) 122,870 (294,538) 1,999,086 366,844 26,531 42,185 986,038 674,519 493,225 1,753,608 1,831,154

FY 15/16 Revenue 4,500 177,786 284,253 101,000 44,950 34,300 1,700 2,700 261,133 213 420,840 2,549,773 1,587,045 198,178 4,254,011 1,918,433 2,759,805 564,200 173,914 207,500 864,380 822,775 644,958 561,640

FY 15/16 Expense 325,080 209,300 381,180 108,006 438,840 9,000 261,133 213 420,840 2,549,773 1,028,749 209,065 4,254,011 2,138,130 2,759,805 564,200 184,921 180,870 1,130,590 763,510 857,283 558,488

FY 15/16 Net Change (320,580) (31,514) (96,927) (7,006) (393,890) 25,300 1,700 2,700 558,296 (10,887) (219,697) (0) (11,007) 26,630 (266,210) 59,265 (212,325) 3,152

195,557,876 15,359,932

201,247,431 15,180,678

(5,689,555) 179,254

June 30, 2016 Projected Fund Balance 681,382 22,437 278,524 254,372 (188,630) 132,611 515,305 60,966 105,451 (10,139) (10139) 13,405 43 78,042 266,095 444,915 111,983 (294,538) 1,779,389 366,844 26,531 31,178 1,012,668 408,309 552,490 1,541,283 1,834,306

Changes in General Fund Balance (000 Omitted)

Adopted Budget Changes 14/15

Audited 6/30/14 Balance Fund Balance Changes Fund Balance Carryover Addition/Use of Fund Balance Additional Commitments Assignments

2015/16 Budget

Additional Additional Reserve Projected Changes Assignments 6/30/15 14/15 14/15 Balance

(1,933)

(513)

(4,795)

(1,933)

(513)

(4,795)

Proposed 15/16 Changes

6/30/16 Estimated Balance

(273)

Unassigned - for Economic Uncertainties

8,408

Miscellaneous Assigned Restricted* Public Safety General Purpose Public Safety Facilities Other Commitments General Purpose Other Assignments State Realignment COP Payments Accumulated Leave Liability Information Systems Infrastructure Facilities Planning Pension Contributions Civil Litigation General Plan Update Costs Economic Development Infrastructure

1,150

(57)

1,093

1,093

161

(4)

157

157

600

600

600

1,167

3,113

7,080

7,080

300 43 1,650 1,457 3,581 3,087 80 750 250

25 57

20

325 100 1,650 1,327 5,071 3,587 120 750 395

140

325 100 1,650 1,577 5,071 3,587 120 750 535

66

4,795

21,162

390

21,552

(504)

-

23,422

117

23,539

15,926

Total Fund Balance

25,484

250

(380) (50) 500

1,540 40

125 375 (1,558)

*Restricted for a specific purpose by external parties.

General Fund Summary

23,422

894

3,967

Total Other Commitments & Assignments

6/30/15 Projected Balance

(273)

FY 14/15 Carryover

15/16 Revenue

-

67,766

15/16 Expense 67,649

15/16 Net Change 117

6/30/16 Projected Balance 23,539

250