Modeling of energy systems an industrial view

Modeling of energy systems – an industrial view IEW 2010 conference, June 21, 2010 Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Lars Strömberg Professor Vi...
Author: Janice Peters
0 downloads 4 Views 7MB Size
Modeling of energy systems – an industrial view IEW 2010 conference, June 21, 2010 Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Lars Strömberg Professor Vice president R&D Vattenfall AB

© Vattenfall AB

The Vattenfall Group • Vattenfall sells almost 200 TWh electricity

– The main part is produced by hydropower, nuclear power and coal. – A smaller part is produced by bio fuels and wind power – About 20 TWh is produced in combined heat and power plants

• Vattenfall sell about 40 TWh heat

– The main part is produced by bio fuels, coal and gas in cogeneration plants

• 40,000 employees • Vattenfall emits about 90 million tons of CO2 per annum

© Vattenfall AB

2

Generation portfolio totalling about 40,000 MW

© Vattenfall AB

3

Vattenfall has declared that we will reduce our emissions by 50% by 2030 and be carbon neutral until 2050

© Vattenfall AB

The Internal Abatement Project supports Vattenfall’s vision to be CO2 neutral by 2050 Vattenfall’s clean energy road map

Key success factors

gCO2/kWh electricity



Investment and growth strategy adapted to climate change



Strategic market positioning and climate development of our products and services



Include climate perspective in all key decisions

100% 90%

600

80%

500

2007 curve

400 300 200

70%

Vattenfall target 2030

60% 50% 40%

Abatement vision

30% 20%

100 0

1990

© Vattenfall AB

10% 1

2010

2030

2

0%

2050

5

Demand for new generation in EU27 Energy demands

• Great need for new generation as well as replacements for old power plants. Est. 500 bn Euro

Additional demand Installed capacity in EU in GW

• Electricity consumption expected to increase by over 20% between 2005 and 2020.

Demand for new plant capacity

Wind

Replacement demand

Coal, gas, oil

Nuclear

• During the next few decades, coal and nuclear power plants in particular will reach decommissioning age.

Hydro power

Wind and other renewables Coal, gas, oil Nuclear Hydro power

Source: EU – Energy and Transport Outlook, VGB

© Vattenfall AB

≈ 300,000 MW until 2020

6

Modeling the energy system without „friction“ • The models can express a path forward without “friction” • Experience gives: – – – – –

Technologies are considered static Cost for energy from a certain energy source have a fixed cost The infrastructure is not modeled Infrastructure has no restrictions We start from the very beginning with a blank sheet of paper

• The energy system is deregulated and commercial in reality – – – – –

© Vattenfall AB

The emission trading system exists Energy use cannot be changed by command Availability is above 90 % Close down for overhauls every fourth year Operating and maintenance personnel very low

7

A carbon abatement portfolio

Source IEA, K Bennaceur

© Vattenfall AB

8

Modeling the energy system „with friction“ • The system contains numerous hinders and locking effects • In reality – – – – – –

Technologies develop Cost changes The infrastructure is not perfect Infrastructure has numerous restrictions System costs are often neglected We do not stop a plant until it is uneconomical

• We live in a commercial environment – – – – © Vattenfall AB

The emission trading system exists Fuel cost is volume depending Electricity price is set by the market …………… 9

Energy System Analysis • We know where we want to come – the sustainable system • Numerous lock-in effects exists, – – – – –

Technical Economical Political Previous decisions Market

• Stepwise approach • Varying costs and availabilty • Market based analysis

© Vattenfall AB

10

Market behaviour

The energy price is set by the market in Europe

© Vattenfall AB

11

Electricity generation costs (assuming 30 €/ton CO2) €/MWh 70 60 50 CO2 cost Fuel O&M Capital

40 30 20 10 0 Large PF plant

© Vattenfall AB

ETS cost

PF plant CCS

12

ETS cost

Electricity generation costs (assuming 30 €/ton CO2) €/MWh 70

Varaible cost

60 50 CO2 cost Fuel O&M Capital

40 30 20 10 0 Large PF plant

© Vattenfall AB

ETS cost

PF plant CCS

13

ETS cost

SUPPLY CURVE 2005 Germany Long-term variable Costs Pf / kWh (Fuel+Pers.+O&M) 19,00

Supply Curve 2005 ohne Neubauten Öffentliche Versorgung + Industrie 52GW 60GW Baseload Average Load

18,00

78GW Peakload

Verfügbare Netto-Engpassleistung in MW el.

17,00 16,00 15,00 14,00 13,00 12,00 11,00 10,00 9,00

About 11000 MW transfer from abroad is possible

8,00 7,00 6,00

KWK-Anlagen

Suggest Documents