Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Richard Meyerhoff, PhD Steven Wolosoff

Watershed-Wide Compliance & CBRP Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force January 15, 2013

Tina Petersen, PhD

WATERSHED-WIDE MONITORING UPDATE

Watershed-Wide Compliance Monitoring 

Dry Season Monitoring – Final 2012 dry season report submitted to SAWPA December 21  Wet Weather Event Monitoring – Sampled wet weather event December 13-17  Wet Season Monitoring – With Regional Board approval, sample initiation delayed three weeks to address staffing issues and holidays – Weekly sampling began the week of January 7 and will be completed in mid-March – SBCFCD has contracted with Brown & Caldwell to implement sampling program – Draft wet season report due April 26th CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Watershed-Wide Compliance Monitoring Program: Wet Weather Event Results E. coli Concentration (cfu/100 mL) Sample Event

Date

0 hrs

12/13/12

≥ 4300

≥ 6300

48 hrs

12/15/12

580

72 hrs

12/16/12

96 hrs

12/17/12

SAR @ Pedley

Prado Park Lake

≥ 7200

≥ 8300

20000

710

1400

1040

160

160

180

140

210

130

170

210

140

170

180

Chino Cr.

MillSAR @ MWD Cucamonga Cr. Crossing

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

TRIENNIAL REVIEW REPORT

Triennial Review Report 

2013 Triennial Report – Tabulate/summarize data collected since preparation of the 2010 Triennial Report to: • Evaluate status of compliance with TMDL • Present information on any overall trends since data collection began since 2007; and • Report on progress towards meeting the TMDL’s urban wasteload allocations during dry weather conditions. – Complete evaluation of bacterial indicator and flow data to determine if the CBRP Compliance Analysis should be revised based on newly collected data

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Water quality at compliance monitoring sites – Summer dry weather  No significant long-term trends in bacterial indicator concentration  Prado Park Lake in compliance  Santa Ana River close to compliance  Mill-Cucamonga and Chino Creeks much greater than WLA

113 cfu/100 mL

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Water quality at compliance monitoring sites Winter dry weather  No significant longterm trends in bacterial indicator concentration  Santa Ana River close to compliance  Mill-Cucamonga and Chino Creeks have lower concentrations than during dry season

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Water quality at compliance monitoring sites  Seasonal trend of increasing receiving water concentration from beginning to end of summer dry season

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

What is the reason for the seasonal increases?  2011 40

300

35

250

30 200

25 20

150

15

100

10 50

5 0

TSS Temp (c ) Turbidity E. coli E. coli

0 6/6

6/26

7/16

8/5

8/25

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

9/14

10/4

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

What is the reason for the seasonal increases?  2012 140

300

120

250

100

200 TSS

80 150 60 100

40 20

50

0

0 6/20

7/10

7/30

8/19

9/8

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

9/28

Temp (c ) Turbidity E. coli

10/18

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Santa Ana River Monitoring: Relationship between MWD Crossing and Pedley Avenue

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Santa Ana River Monitoring: Relationship between MWD Crossing and Pedley Avenue  2008: t-test shows no significant difference between MWD and Pedley data sets 800

E. coli (cfu/100 mL)

700 600

GM - SAR at MWD Crossing GM - SAR at Pedley

500 400 300 200 100 5/5/08

6/4/08

7/4/08

8/3/08

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

9/2/08

10/2/08

11/1/08

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Santa Ana River Monitoring: Relationship between MWD Crossing and Pedley Avenue  2009: t-test shows no significant difference between MWD and Pedley data sets 800

E. coli (cfu/100 mL)

700 600

GM - SAR at MWD Crossing GM - SAR at Pedley

500 400 300 200 100 4/27/09

5/27/09

6/26/09

7/26/09

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

8/25/09

9/24/09 10/24/09

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Santa Ana River Monitoring: Relationship between MWD Crossing and Pedley Avenue  2010: t-test shows there IS a significant difference between MWD and Pedley data sets 800

E. coli (cfu/100 mL)

700 600

GM - SAR at MWD Crossing GM - SAR at Pedley

500 400 300 200 100 4/22/10

5/22/10

6/21/10

7/21/10

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

8/20/10

9/19/10 10/19/10

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Santa Ana River Monitoring: Relationship between MWD Crossing and Pedley Avenue  2011: t-test shows no significant difference between MWD and Pedley data sets 800

E. coli (cfu/100 mL)

700 600

GM - SAR at MWD Crossing GM - SAR at Pedley

500 400 300 200 100 4/17/11

5/17/11

6/16/11

7/16/11

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

8/15/11

9/14/11 10/14/11

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Santa Ana River Monitoring: Relationship between MWD Crossing and Pedley Avenue  2012: t-test shows there IS a significant difference between MWD and Pedley data sets 800

E. coli (cfu/100 mL)

700 600

GM - SAR at MWD Crossing GM - SAR at Pedley

500 400 300 200 100 5/11/12

6/10/12

7/10/12

8/9/12

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

9/8/12

10/8/12

11/7/12

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Could barn swallows or bats be a reason for increases in E. coli at end of season?

Bat droppings



Texas Study - Source: Presentation on Sources and Persistence of E. coli in Inland Texas Streams by Dr. Michael Barrett (paper by Sekjora et al. 2011)

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Could barn swallows or bats be a reason for increases in E. coli at end of season?

Courtesy of Tad Garrety, City of Chino Hills Boys Republic South Channel Investigation) CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Could barn swallows or bats be a reason for increases in E. coli at end of season?

Bridge on Cucamonga Creek

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Barn and Cliff Swallows – A Source of E. coli 

Study conducted by Sejkora, et al. (2011)



Demonstrated colony of cliff swallows nesting under bridge resulted in measurable increase in fecal indicator bacteria and exceedance of surface water quality standard

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

E. coli concentrations in samples downstream of swallow colony significantly higher than upstream samples

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Estimated relationship between swallow nests and E. coli concentration Compliance Monitoring Location Mill-Cucamonga Creek at Chino-Corona Rd (WW-M5) Chino Creek at Central (WWC7) Santa Ana River at MWD Crossing (WW-S1) Santa Ana River at Pedley Ave (WW-S4)

Average DWF Change in E. Coli # Cliff Swallow (cfs) (cfu/ 100mL) Nests 9

100

73

12

100

95

68

100

536

118

100

931

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

CBRP TIER 1 SOURCE EVALUATION: OVERVIEW

CBRP – Three Step Process • Prioritized drainage areas for evaluation of mitigation alternatives

Step 1

• Selection of non-structural and/or structural BMPs to mitigate source • Completion of Project Identification phase (CIP process) for structural BMP

• Completion of UAAs to facilitate structural BMP projects

Step 2

Step 3

• Completion of Budget/Planning, Design, and Permitting phases of CIP process

• Construction of structural BMPs

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

CBRP Implementation – Step 1 Implement non-structural BMP activities; conduct Tier 1 source evaluation activities to identify controllable urban sources of dry weather flow/bacterial indicators from MS4 outfalls

Evaluate Tier 1 data to identify potential for MS4 outfalls to cause impairment at watershed-wide compliance sites

Impairment not caused by MS4 –Addressed outside of CBRP

Impairment potentially caused by MS4 - Prioritize identified controllable urban sources based on flow volume and/or estimated bacteria load

Key Outcome - Prioritized Drainage Area (PDA)s: PDA #1, PDA #2, PDA #3, etc. CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Monitoring activities (2007-2012)  USEP Study (2007-2008)  Box Springs special study (2008-2009)  Dry weather discharge measurements (2010)  Pomona Tier 1 bacterial monitoring (2011)  CBRP Tier 1 source evaluation program (2012) – 10 of 34 sites also monitored in 2007-08 USEP Study  Boys Republic South Channel (2012)

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

CBRP Tier 1 Source Evaluation Monitoring 

Monitoring Plan/QAPP Updated in 2012 to incorporate additional sample locations for Tier 1 Source Evaluation Sampling  Sample Sites – Selected 2007-2008 Urban Source Evaluation Program sites – Additional Tier 1 sites identified in CBRP - “Tier 1 Site” generally defined as locations where urban sources of dry weather flow may directly discharge to a receiving waterbody  Constituents Sampled at Tier 1 sites – E. coli concentration (MPN/100 mL) – Presence/Absence of Human Bacteroides – Flow  Samples collected for 10 week consecutive period from week of May 7 through week of July 9 – Riverside County – 17 sites – San Bernardino County – 16 sites CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

CBRP TIER 1 SOURCE EVALUATION: DATA COMPARISON

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Changes in MS4 (2007 to 2012)  Geomean of E. coli concentration

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Changes in MS4 (2007 to 2012)  Mean of dry weather flow

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Changes in MS4 (2007 to 2012)  Presence / Absence of human Bacteroides

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

CBRP TIER 1 SOURCE EVALUATION: PRIORITIZATION

Prioritization of MS4 Drainages  Criteria for prioritization – E. coli geomean (mpn/100mL) – Dry weather flow (cfs) – Human Bacteroides (Presence/Absence [P/A]) – Risk of exposure via recreation (High/Low)  Relative rank for each criteria computed  Weighting of criteria to develop a composite score –

Preliminary approach (30 percent each for E.coli geomean, human P/A, and flowrate; 10 percent for risk of exposure)

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Risk of Exposure Determination  Low – completely concrete lined MS4 system that outfalls to a concrete lined receiving waterbody segment

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Risk of Exposure Determination 

High – natural channel is present anywhere within an MS4 system, or an outfall that discharges to a natural channel segment of a receiving waterbody

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

CBRP TIER 1 SOURCE EVALUATION: SOURCE CONTRIBUTION ANALYSIS

Source contribution analysis 

Estimate of expected E. coli concentration in receiving waterbody



Flow weighted average of MS4 inflow concentrations and clean POTW effluent (w/o in-stream dynamics)



Expected concentration compared to measured for 7 weeks in June/July 2012

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Source contribution analysis  Cucamonga Creek

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

Highly variable clean effluent rates from RP1

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Source contribution analysis  Eastvale Line A – E. coli load not measured in 2007  Chris Basin – continues to be a high priority MS4 drainage area

Geomean: 88 cfu/100mL

w/o EVLA and CHRIS

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Source contribution analysis  Chino Creek

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Source contribution analysis  Boys Republic South - E. coli load not measured in 2007  Chino Creek – Pomona MS4 not measured in 2007 (data from 2011)

Carbon Canyon Creek Channel goes above 500 cfu/100mL

Geomean: 43 cfu/100mL

w/o BRSC and CHINOCRK

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Source contribution analysis  Santa Ana River at MWD Crossing

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Source contribution analysis  Santa Ana River at Pedley Ave

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Source contribution analysis  Tier 1 data suggests Santa Ana River at both stations should be in compliance assuming no in-stream sources  Watershed-wide compliance monitoring data suggest seasonal patterns to in-stream sources  Seasonal fluctuations in river E. coli concentration from instream sources are as much as five times the measured inputs from MS4 sources

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

NEXT STEPS

Deliverable Schedule 

Tier 1 Source Evaluation and Triennial Report will be prepared as one report submittal – Data presentation - January 15, 2013 – Draft Report by January 22, 2013 – Comments by January 28, 2013 – Final Report – February 6, 2013 (submittal to Regional Board by February 11) Deliverable date meets MS4 permit deliverable requirement for Triennial Report and exceeds CBRP requirement to submit Tier 1 source evaluation report by March 31, 2013

CBRP for Middle Santa Ana River Bacterial TMDL Watershed Wide Compliance & Tier 1 Prioritization Analysis

January 15, 2013 Presentation to MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Source contribution – potential other bacteria sources SOURCES

PATHWAYS

POTENTIAL INSPECTION ACTIONS

Wildlife

Droppings over water

Underpass/culvert bird surveys

Trash

Leaching from DWF stream

Windshield surveys

Homeless

Bathing, Defecation

Transient BMP

Agriculture

Illicit Discharge, Dairy lagoon, liquid manure

Dairy inspections

Sewers

Leaks, Cross connection

Upstream/downstream human P/A, other tracers

Septic Systems

Failing systems

Recon surveys in septic areas

Channel Sediments

Erosion

In-stream erosion control

Regrowth

Biofilms, other favorable areas

Nutrient management

MSAR Bacteria TMDL Task Force

Santa Ana Region-Riverside County MSAR TMDL TF CBRP Implementation Update January 15, 2013

1

Todays Update • Update on CBRP Element 2 Specific BMPs • Update on CBRP Element 3 Inspection Criteria

Element 2: BMPs Transient Camps Ongoing MS4 inspections for transient encampments continue: • Transient camps within MS4 are removed via cooperative program with police, social services, environmental health. • For example on August 13, 2012, University Wash around Spruce Street Bridge.

3

Element 2: BMPs Transient Camps Santa Ana River Clean Up: • Santa Ana River Between County Line to Mission Street Bridge. • Approximately 2 tons of trash and debris cleared out of the river bottom.

4

Element 3: Inspection Criteria Tier 1 Site • Tier 1 Site Monitoring – Bacteroides results showed consistent strong human signal at the Eastvale MDP Line E outlet. – Field visit on December 4, 2012 to asses possible locations to investigate. – Inventory tools for dry weather source assessment.

Questions? Thank You

6

Element 1: Ordinances Water Conservation and Irrigation Control Permittees have reviewed their existing ordinances to see if they provide sufficient authority to regulate and enforce on sources of dry weather flow. • Existing ordinances, including recently adopted ordinances to comply with AB 1881 and SB7, do provide sufficient authority to regulate and enforce on sources of dry weather flow. Permittees will continue to focus on enforcement of these ordinances. Permittees will continue to collaborate with utility provider • to meet goals of their adopted Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) where needed. 7

Element 1: Ordinances Pathogen Control Permittees have reviewed their existing Stormwater/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Control Ordinances to see if they provide sufficient authority to manage animal waste on public and private properties and assign penalties for failure • Existing ordinances do provide sufficient authority. Permittees will focus on enforcing existing ordinances. •

8

Element 2: BMP’s Street Sweeping • Street Sweeping Program evaluations – Permittees evaluate the need to revise street sweeping programs. – City of Norco contracts with a street sweeping company. Conventional and vacuum assisted sweepers are utilized. On a yearly basis the program is evaluated and deficiencies addressed. – City of Riverside plans on purchasing one vacuum assisted sweeper when a conventional sweeper reaches end of life.

Element 2: BMPs Irrigation and Water Conservation Permittees looking to identify BMP practices for future implementation: • City of Norco, a water service provider, is evaluating the potential of tiered water rate schedule • Permittees will continue to collaborate with their utility providers to meet the goals of the UWMP where needed. In partnership with water service providers several permittees offer rebates on irrigation and water conservation devices such as Weather Based Irrigation Controllers. 10

Element 2: BMP’s Pet waste management • Backyard composting factsheet-Countywide project – To provide information on how to compost manure from back yard agricultural operations using easy to build compost bins. – Detailed building plans and material list to encourage Do-it-Yourself projects. – Detailed information on siting to prevent Stormwater contact.

Element 2: BMP’s Pet waste management • Manure Haul Away Program-City of Norco – To provide residents a convenient option for disposing of the manure from their property. – Trash service provider hauls away manure. – Residents pay a fee along with their trash service fee.

Element 2: BMP’s Pet waste management • Doggie Bag Dispensers-City of Riverside – To provide residents a sanitary option for disposing of their pet waste along popular walking trails. – Convenient for residents.

CITY OF MONTCLAIR MSAR TMDL COMPLIANCE Location

Source of DWF

Actions

Brooks Basin drainage area

• IEUA Recycled Water • Minor Nuisance Flow

None! All flow drains to Brooks Basin 24/7.

L.A. County Storm Drain/Pomona

• Residential Nuisance Flow • Very Minor • L.A. County/Pomona Contribution

Possible Green Street Retro fit in the not so far future.

Mission Blvd Storm Drain System

• Commercial Area Facility Landscaping

Collaborating with Monte Vista Water District to work with businesses to provide business with smart sprinkler controllers water conserving sprinklers & education.

Surface Flow South End of City

• Residential Area • Nuisance/overwatering

Green Sheet Project with pervious pavement.

THE MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION… IS THE CITY OF MONTCLAIR IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MSAR DWF TMDL?