The
Journal
of Biochemistry,
Vol.
48, No.
2, 1960
MECHANISM
OF IN
.
CYANIDE
CYANIDE
RESISTANCE
ACHROMOBACTER‡W
RESISTANT
RESPIRATION
OF
CULTIVATED
BY
SHOJI
MIZUSHIMA*,
(From
the
Department
(Received
In
the
previous
cultivated
of
chrome
a2
tion of
of the
that
cells
cells
a2
the
of
in
in
12,
reported
of
1960)
that higher
aerobic
Achrotnobacter
strain
concentration
of
condition
was
reported
or
the
and
this
cells
less
and
sensitive
concerning
iron (2)
in
(3)
the
they
paper,
relation the
the
that
to
(4).
the
medium
the
7 cyto
respira
cyanide
than
doubt
that
and
function
the
concentration
authors
content
the
between
the
these
a2 on
relation
and
However,
cytochrome
threw
studies
between
presence
oxygen
were
the or
the
it
may
mechanism
of
of
of
failed
to
respiratory of
cyanide
the
as
find
activity
cytochrome
the
purpose the
cells
a2
it
of
as
a
bacteria
different
considered
to of
confirm
out activity
under
significance may
finding
respiratory grown
are
physiological as
in
the
relations
well
resistance
the and
of
these
clear
chain,
for
content
cyanide,
on
make
respiratory
out a2
absence Studies
because
in
carried
cytochrome
the
concentrations.
portant, a2
Faculty
oxidase.
In the
been
oxygen
between
bacteria,
ARIMA
Tokyo)
contained under
KEI
aerobically.
parallelism
cytochrome
was
anaerobically
have of
cytochrome out
cultivated
studies
concentration
Tokyo,
February
condition
grown
grown
Many
it
AND
Chemistry,
of
publication,
(1)
anaerobic
than
the
for
OKA
Agricultural
University
paper
under
CELLS
TETSUO
Agriculture,
ANAEROBICALLY
the
be
im
cytochrome view
on
the
(5).
EXPERIMENTALS
The
methods
of
of
DPNH
measurement sorption
spectrum
Cultivation study. contained Air
apparatus
under
very
necessary cylinder
medium the
could
to
Present
a
from
aerobic
which *
of
be
with
easily
the
had
stood ,
in a
"porous
condition
measure
address
shown
few
1.
degree
about
aeration,
Institute
and of
in The of
a
simple
silicon
had
205
is
filled
Microbiology,
intact
oil
as
an
the
air with
for
led
agent.
could When into
water.
a
Using of
this liters)
fish-breeding.
medium
University
for 6
antiforming
minute. was
ab
(5).
(capacity
used
per
cells, of
designed
vessel
apparatus,
out-letting been
apparatus
usually
air
the
measurement
previously
cultivation
7liters the
Applied
this
of and
described
which In
passing of
those
drops
stone"
autoclaved.
upside-down The
to
Fig.
activity
preparation
cultivated
air
by
oxidation
cell-free
similar
were
was
succinic of
were
Bacteria•\Bacteria
bubbled
This
of activity
cytochromes
apparatus 4liters
was
oxidase
of of
The
measurement
Tokyo,
be it
kept was
graduated this
ap-
Tokyo.
206
S.
paratus,
bacteria
meat
were
extract,
The
rate
cultivated
1per of
culture
MIZUSHIMA,
cent
bacterial
in
of
growth
was
AND
nutrient
K
broth
polypeptone
FIG.
air
and
.
ARIMA
(pH
0.5per
measured
Preparations harvested
7.0)
containing
cent
of
1per
sodium
nepherometrically
The
D;
cent
chloride,
by
amount
of
M/15
tant
for fluid
of
at
sampling
32•‹.
10ml.
of
of
a
was
of
for
a
and
intact
cells
and
at
M/15
phosphate
the
was
exposed
turbid
oxidase for
small
to
sonic at
superna
activity.
60minutes
and
cell a
centrifuged
The
particulate
buffer
washed in
was
DPNH
The
solution.
suspended
debris.
145,000•~g
fraction.
of
were
were
saline
suspending
obtained
cell of
conditions
cent
suspension
thus
measurement
centrifuged
volume
by
thick
various
0.5per
cells
this
tube.
under
with
washed
sonicate
particulate
Porous
thermostat.
measured the
The
the
further
and
small
amount
the
used
fluid in
the
7.4)
C;
a
grown
was
(pH
remove
and fluid
suspended
mation
buffer
in
once
Then
filter. F ; Sampling
bacteria
7.4).
cultivation.
air
soaked
washed bacteria
(pH
to
supernatant
again
was
for 15minutes.
diluted
turbid
apparatus
intact
phosphate
20minutes
non-diluted clear
of
KC)
was
E ; Medium.
Cell•\The
buffer
(9-10
5,000•~g
the
bacterial
Gotten
let.
centrifugation,
activity
for B;
Out
Bacterial
phosphate
oscillation
use,
continuous
respiratory M/15
Apparatus
compressor.
stone.
from
by
1.
Air
For
a
a
OKA
medium.
A;
in
T.
The to
obtain
preparation was
used
for
was the
esti
cytochromes.
RESULTS
The
bacteria
7liters
per
these
the kinds
were
number of
was
no
of The significant
cells
were
Using
insensitivity
under
about in
these
difference
to were
to "the
two
respiration results
Fig.
reached called
two
200ml.
shown
of
cells
respectively.
measured.
cultivated and
cultivations
when two
were minute
kinds
2.
shown
In
both
the
cases,
cells" cells, and
in
flow The
the
Table respiratory
"the
Fig. activity
cells"
activity, content 3.
in
these
anaerobic
respiratory
and
about
harvested
Hereafter
cytochromes I
i.e. curves
were
ml. and
the
rates, growth
cells
7•~103per
aerobic of
air
minute.
about
cyanide
between
different
per
the were
Though
there
of
kinds
both
FIG
CYANIDE
of
cells,
the
sensitive
to
succinic
oxidation
cyanide
than
activity that
. Bacteria
were
apparatus
RESISTANCE. ‡W
of
2.
in
Succinic meter.
of
aeration;
7liters
•\•œ•\
aeration;
0.2liters
oxidizing
Each (pH
ment,
0.2ml.
7.4) of
and
center
well.
Total
by
oxidase
oxidase than
buffer
and
of
0.4ƒÊM
addition
of that
the of
of
contained
0.2ml.
per
2.2ml.
activity
of
Each
photo-cell
of
anaerobic
the
case
of
In
lesss DPNH
at
32•‹
using
the
of
in
oxidase cells,
or side
measured
the arm
using
buffer
of
the
activity
of there
of
of
sonicate,
the
volume
aerobic a
remarkable
respiro
M/15
phosphate
main
compart
20%
KOH
in
Photoelectric 2.3ml.
Reaction
Total
was
the
Hitachi
buffer.
water.
Warburg
0.2ml.
using
Cells
of
in
and
0.2ml. or
Anaerobic
1.6ml.
measured
KCN
and
and
4•~109cells,
the
0.2ml.
minute.
Aerobic
was
KCN
was
minute. per
contained
of 10-2M
the
cell
in
sonicate
DPNH
much
I
about
10-2M
volume
sonicate, the
of
intact
succinate
0.3ml.
was
curve. broth
Activities
vessel
2•~10-1M
spectrophotometer. phosphate
Respiratory
activity
Warburg
buffer
DPNH
on
.
cells
1.
•\•›•\
Cyanide
cells
nutrient
T ABLE Effect
anaerobic
growth in
Fig.
the
aerobic
Bacterial
cultivated
shown
of the
207
of was
M/15 started
3.0ml.
cells
was
lower
difference
208
S. MIZUSHIMA, T. OKA AND K. ARIMA
between the the presence
oxidative activity of aerobic cells and of cyanide. As shown in Fig. 3, the
FIG . 3. reduced
Absorption
with ---
„Ÿ„Ÿ
a2
cells,
from
aerobic
Preparation
obtained
from
anaerobic
in
to
those
of
cyanide
the
Nitrogen
of
preparation
cells
was
with
two
kinds
the
cells
cytochrome of
glass
Model
method.
than
that
in
between
These
aerobically
were
Cary
observed
cells.
extracts
preparation
higher
was
cor
crude
using
opal
much
of
of
measured the
.
cells.
anaerobic
on
difference
these
type
was
based
cells
contents
and
Spectrum
significant
of
the
aerobic
100:89.
anaerobic
obtained
results
were
in
presence
grown
the
the
aerobic
amount quite
of similar
or
absence
(5). the
observed.
cells
of
which
of
cytochromes
medium,
2liters
medium,
and
a
shown of the
the
the
culture
studied
Fig.
state, 4,
medium condition
of
from were
these
changed
of by
the to
was
activity
bacteria
4liters
condition growth
conditions. of
replaced was
rapid
respiratory
cultivation the
anaerobic
the
the
under a
under
condition,
properties
steady in
cultivated
aerobic
were
in As
been
under
changes
experiment follows.
had
cultivated The
amount
as
show
Spectrophotometer,
further
this
figure peak.
14
bl
When were
the the
the
no
cytochrome
in to
separation ratio
cells in cytoch
dithionite.
in
whereas,
particulate
obtained
Letters
rome
of
Preparation
responding before
spectrum
that of anaerobic concentration of
To was
the
anaerobic
equal
volume
aerobic
and
one.
the
perform
carried
out culture of
When
fresh the
FIG
CYANIDE
amount
of
again The
bacteria
replaced same
in by
the
the
treatment
medium fresh
was
min.), at
the
A
was
vation
replaced was
at at
A,
II
and
Medium;
C B,
B,
and C
Fig.
the
and
D.
of fresh The
D
were
of
Cyanide
equal
removed
centrifugation and and their sensitivity
from
broth.
on
the
carried
two
(aeration;
volume
liters
on of
the
the
fresh
medium
When
culture
medium
medium.
The
bacteria the
the were
same
in for
0.4Liter/
of
Temperature
Succinic
;
the
culti again
treatment
culture
media
experiments
shown
vessel
32•‹.
II Oxidizing
Activity
A, B, C and D in Column I show harvested at the point A, B, C and D in tively. The conditions of measurement of ing activity were the same those given in medium
each
was
5.
nutrient
TABLE Effect
medium
curve. culture
used
the was
From
(12liter/min.).
2liters of
of
cultivation .
growth
by
volume
the
anaerobic
aeration
to
equal
2liters
more
Bacterial the
rapid
reached
repeated
Table
4.
replaced
by
by
removed in
was
followed
and twice
of
209
doubled,
medium
4liters
2liters
was
repeated
. From
RESISTANCE. ‡W
the
of
In
Cell
the intact cells Fig. 4, respec succinic oxidiz Table I.
bacterial
used for experiments. to cyanide were shown.
Intact
Table Though
cells
were
harvested
II, the oxidase the respiratory
by
activity activity
.
FIG
210
S. MIZUSHIMA, T. OKA AND K. ARIMA
of the the
intact
succinic
cells
remained
oxidizing
reduced
constant
activity
in the
. 5. Absorption with dithionite.
A, B, C and
D show
throughout presence
spectrum
the
the course
spectrum
of
of
of this experiment,
cyanide
particulate
of particulate
was
decreased
preparation preparation
obtained
from the cells harvested at the points A, B, C and D in Fig. 4, respectively. Nitrogen contents of crude extracts before separation of the particulate preparation of A, B, C and D were in the ratio 100:83:105:100. were measured using Cary Model 14 Spectrophotometer based glass
method.
FIG . 6. respiratory
Succinic
rement
of
oxidizing Table
of
Relation activity
•\•œ•\
value
Spectra, on the opal
cytochrorne activity
II.
Cytochrome
cytochrome
content;
between in
presence
cytochrome of
b1. •\•›•\ in
see
cytochrorne
presence
content text.
content
of was
and
cyanide.
the
a2.
cyanide value
(10-3M of
Fig.
was 5.
Measu
the
in
CYANIDE
reverse
propotion
the
to
properties
The
of
absorption
Fig.
5.
The
As
it
from
amount
lines
to
on
estimated
from
at
and
630mƒÊ
amount
a2
of
and
and
was
and
the
and
b1
be
straight
600mƒÊ
line) the
not
First,
a2
and
660
b1
was
and
in
optical
relation
activity
between
could
the
Therefore,
between
shows
respiratory
observed
cyanide. in
follows.
straight
6.
between of
cytochrome
minus Fig.
relation
oxidized).
as
of
b1 bacterial
cytochromes a2
580mƒÊ,
reverse
the
presence
minus
in
cytochrome to
close
oxidize
.
shown in
of
a
cells
were
decreased
the
estimated
(spectrum
a2
parallelism
is
cytochrome
amount
respectively.
be
in to
was
the
difference
561mƒÊ,
A
b1
cells
experiment aerobic
propotion
(reduced
545mƒÊ
cytochrome
cyanide.
and
Then
the
of
these
this the
amount
there
difficult
spectrum
between
the
of of
to
activity
amount
end
those
reverse
that
very
difference
spectrum.
seemed
in
suggest
be
cytochrome
drawn the
also
respiratory
the
the
of
were
mƒÊ
found
the to of
decreased
the
at
Though
not
and
preparation,
estimated
a2
strongly
content
was
particulate
was
results
a2
and
cytochromes
growth.
it
These
cytochrome
the
211
reached
cytochrome
bacterial
changeable,
growth.
the
of
the
growth, system
of
amount to
also
bacterial
respiratory
spectrum
proportion was
the
the
RESISTANCE. ‡W
density
between
in
the
the
presence
of
them.
DISCUSSION
Many
studies
cytochrome
a2
Escherichia tion
was
kinds
of
no
a2
marked
and as
cytochrome
deficiency, iron
rich
activity
of
between In
of
a2
Achromobacter and the
strain the
of
10-3M caused
the at
step
content
In
the
of
(7)
authors and
the
was
no
previous
cyanide
the cytochrome
also
content
failed
to
and
electron
a
increase
Therefore,
that
of cyto
there
was
respiratory
out
the
the
relation
it
but
in
was not
the
reported
in the
the
completely amount
capacity
cytochrome was
activity
in
iron that
of
the
parallelism
respiratory
transfer a2.
find
between
(1),
by
activity.
relation
strongly
though
to role
out
a2
that
the
and
respiratory
a
oxygen
cytochrome
equal
pointed
a2
cyto
on
decreased
on
two
reported
out
almost
doubt
paper
was
the
found was
However, the
the of
also
aerogenes that
was
cytochrome
and
a2 of
of
threw
there
cytochrome
increase the
also
activity.
a2
concentration
he
these
respiratory
(10-3M).
cells
content 7,
view
aerogenes the
Smith the
(3)
(4)
of
of
importance
Aerobacter
the
Aerobacter
and
then,
of
whereas
activity
Moss
Tissieres
result,
a2
cytochrome
cyanide
cyanide
So
cytochrome
oxido-reduction by
of
(6)
that
supported
activity this
physiological
content
hand,
between
bacteria.
content
between
other
content
Keillin
the
and
the
From
parallelism
a2
the
that
concentra
condition,
respiratory
After
the
reported
higher
aerobic
the
between
(2)
contained
under
on
cytochrome
medium,
a2
a2. of
doubt oxidase.
respiratory
cells.
chrome
threw
On
the
lack
the
oxidase.
grown between
relation
Moss
condition
that
terminal of
in
the
a2
he
the
concentration the
than
the
condition.
anaerobic
difference
dependence
was
a
a2
concerning
cultivation
under
significant
cells,
chrome
reported
and
grown
cytochrome
there
been
content
coli
of
have
results
presence that
the
inhibited of
the
observed
cytochrome presence presented
of in
212
S. MIZUSHIMA, T. OKAAND K. ARIMA
this paper could be explained as follows. As the respiration of these bacteria may not be limitted by the reaction catalized by cytochrome a2, the change in the amount of cytochrome a2 seemed to have no influence on the respira tory activity. However, the fact that the respiratory activity was strongly inhibited by 10-3M concentration of cyanide shows that the reaction catalized by cytochrome a2 limits the over-all reaction in the presence of cyanide. Therefore, if cytochrome a2 have an important role in the respiratory chain, there must be a parallelism between the cytochrome a2 content and the respiratory activity in the presence of cyanide. The results given in Fig. 6 show the parallelism between these two. In addition, the fact that there was a parallelism between the cytochrome a2 content and the respiratory activity in the presence of cyanide confirmed the view on the mechanism of cyanide resistance in the bacteria (5). As shown in Table II, when the anaerobic cells were cultivated under aerobic condition, the cyanide resistance in the respiration decreased in reverse proportion to the bacterial growth. This result was quite different from the case that the cells which had been made ressistant to cyanide in the presence of cyanide, was aerobically cultivated in cyanide-free medium (5). In the later case, the insensitivity to cyanide of the respiratory activity could be observed even after 3 or 4 times cell-divisions in the cyanide-free medium. Possible explanation is that in the former case, though the cyto c hrome a2 content was indeed high in anaerobic cells, this does not mean the increase of the cytochrome a2 forming activity, namely cytochrome a2 seemed to be merely accumulated in the cells owing to the slow growth; whereas in the later case, the cytochrome a2 forming activity was really increased, probably owing to the some fundamental changes in the cell constituent such as in the level of nucleic acid. This may be the reason why the cyanide insensitivity obtained in the presence of cyanide was maintained during 3 or 4 times cell-divisions in the cyanide-free medium. SUMMARY 1. Achromobacter strain 7, grown under anaerobic condition was found to possess greater amount of cytochrome a2 than that grown under aerobic condition. 2. Though the respiratory activities of both kinds of cells were quite equal, the anaerobically cultivated cells showed a higher respiratory activity than the aerobically cultivated cells, in the presence of cyanide (10-3M); namely the respiration became cyanide resistant during an anaerobic cul tivation. 3. A parallelism was observed between the cytochrome a2 content and the respiratory activity in the presence of cyanide. 4. A physiological significance of cytochrome a2 as respiratory carrier and the mechanism of cyanide resistance in anaerobically cultivated cells were discussed.
CYANIDE
The encouragement
authors
wish and
to
express
their
RESISTANCE. ‡W
sincere
appreciation
213
to
Dr.
K.
Sakaguchi
interest.
REFERENCES
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Mizushima, S., and Arima, K., J. Biochem., 47, 837 (1960) Moss, F., Aust, J. Exptl. Biol. Med. Sci., 30, 531 (1952) Moss, F., Aust. J. Exptl. Biol. Med. Sci., 34, 395 (1956) Tissieres, A., BiochemJ., 50, 279 (1952) Mizushima, S., and Arima, K., J. Biochem., 47, 351 (1960) Keilin, D., and Hartley, C., H., Biochem.J., 35, 688 (1941) Smith, L., Archiv. Biochem. Biophys., 50, 299 (1954)
for
his