Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Case  Male / 65  Severe dyspnea, 3 days  High fever and purulent sputum  W...
Author: Dwayne Phelps
29 downloads 0 Views 6MB Size
Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Case



Male / 65



Severe dyspnea, 3 days



High fever and purulent sputum



WBC: 23,000/mm3



2D-echo: EF 60%

Oxygenation under Mechanical ventilation 

Mode: Controlled Mandatory Ventilation



FIO2: 80%



PEEP: 8 cmH 2O



ABGA pH

7.356

PaCO2

42.7 mmHg

PaO2

80.0 mmHg

HCO3-

29.7 mEq/L

SaO2

93.6%

Q1: Which of the following is a correct pathophysiology of hypoxemia in this patient?

1.

Decreased alveolar-capillary barrier permeability

2.

Eosinophil dependent lung injury

3.

A decrease in cytokines

4.

Increased alveolar fluid removal

5.

Heterogeneous acute lung inflammation

Summary of the Case



Acute onset of dyspnea, 3 days



Severe hypoxemia, PaO2/FIO2 = 80 / 0.8 = 100 mmHg



Bilateral opacities in a chest X-ray



Normal cardiac function

What Condition?

ARDS Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

RECOMMENDED CRITERIA FOR ACUTE LUNG INJURY (ALI) AND ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME (ARDS)

Timing

Oxygenation

Chest Radiograph

Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure

ALI criteria

Acute onset

PaO2/FIO2  300 mmHg (regardless of PEEP level)

Bilateral infiltrates seen on frontal chest radiograph

 18 mmHg when measured or no clinical evidence of left atrial hypertension

ARDS criteria

Acute onset

PaO2/FIO2  200 mmHg (regardless of PEEP level)

Bilateral infiltrates seen on frontal chest radiograph

 18 mmHg when measured or no clinical evidence of left atrial hypertension

www.wordle.net

Bernard GR, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;149;818

The New (Berlin) Definition of ARDS Timing Chest imaginga Origin of edema

Within 1 week of a known clinical insult or new or worsening respiratory symptoms Bilateral opacities—not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collapse, or nodules Respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload Need objective assessment (eg, echocardiography) to exclude hydrostatic edema if no risk factor present

Oxygenationb Mild 200 mmHg < PaO2/FIO2  300 mmHg with PEEP or CPAP  5 cmH2Oc Moderate 100 mmHg < PaO2/FIO2  200 mmHg with PEEP 5 cmH2O Severe PaO2/FIO2  100 mmHg with PEEP  5 cm H2O Abbreviations: CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; FIO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; PaO2, partial pressure of arterial oxygen; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure aChest radiograph or computed tomography scan. bIf altitude is higher than 1000 m, the correction factor should be calculated as follows: [Pa /F O2 IO2(barometric pressure/760)]. cThis may be delivered noninvasively in the mild acute respiratory distress syndrome group.

ARDS Definition Task Force, et al. JAMA. 2012;;307:2526

Ware LB, et al. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1334

Increased permeability of the alveolar-capillary barrier Influx of protein-rich edema fluid into the air-space Neutrophil dependent lung injury Cytokines Disrupt normal epithelial fluid transport, impairing the removal of fluid Abnormalities in the production, composition, and function of surfactant Abnormalities of the coagulation system

Q1: Which of the following is a correct pathophysiology of hypoxemia in this patient?

1.

Decreased permeability of the alveolar-capillary barrier

2.

Eosinophil dependent lung injury

3.

Decrease in cytokines

4.

Increased alveolar fluid removal

5.

Heterogeneous acute lung inflammation

Mechanical Ventilation with traditional high tidal volume and zero PEEP

Expiration

Physical stretch

Inspiration

Shearing force

1. Spillover

2. Translocation

Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome

Lung Protective Ventilation Strategies

Heterogeneity  Homogeneity  Prone Position Ventilation Recruitment Maneuver

High (adequate) PEEP Low Tidal Volume 6~8 mL/Kg of predicted body weight Plateau Pr. < 30 cmH2O Shearing force

Lung protective ventilation strategy

Low tidal volume In a Narrow Sense High-PEEP

In a Broad Sense Prone position

Recruitment maneuver

Q2: Which of the following mechanical ventilation strategies for ARDS is a recommended therapy based on strong clinical evidence?

1.

Low tidal volume

2.

High-PEEP

3.

Prone position

4.

Recruitment maneuver

5.

High frequency ventilation

Evidence based recommendations for LPV strategies

A

recommended therapy based on strong clinical evidence from randomized clinical trials

A

B

C

indeterminate evidence: recommended only as alternative therapy

C

D

Low tidal volume

High PEEP

Prone position ventilation

Recruitment maneuvers

A, recommended therapy based on strong clinical evidence from randomized clinical trials; B, recommended therapy based on supportive but limited clinical data; C, indeterminate evidence: recommended only as alternative therapy; D, not recommended based on clinical evidence against efficacy of therapy.

Q2: Which of the following mechanical ventilation strategies for ARDS is a recommended therapy based on strong clinical evidence?

1.

Low tidal volume

2.

High-PEEP

3.

Prone position

4.

Recruitment maneuver

5.

High frequency ventilation

Review of Evidence

Low Tidal Volume

ARDS Network Trial: Lower Tidal Volume vs. Traditional Tidal Volume

Different ONLY in

Tidal volume Plateau pressure

Traditional tidal volume

Lower tidal volume

12 mL/Kg*

6 mL/Kg*

 50 cmH2O

 30 cmH2O

*Kg of predicted body weight

Main Outcomes of ARDS Network Trial

VARIABLE

GROUP RECEIVING LOWER TIDAL VOLUMES

GROUP RECEIVING TRADITIONAL TIDAL VOLUMES

P VALUE

DEATH before discharge home and breathing without assistance (%)

31.0

39.8

0.007

Breathing without assistance by day 28 (%)

65.7

55.0

Suggest Documents