Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
for the
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parkers Creek Preserve Final Report May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Page
Funding generously provided by a grant from the United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
i
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Page ii
This page intentionally left blank.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Page
iii
Table of Contents Acknowledgements .........................................................................................................iv Chapter 1: Vision, Goals, and Existing Conditions .......................................................... 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................. 1 Mission of the American Chestnut Land Trust .......................................................... 1 Planning Process ..................................................................................................... 1 A Vision for ACLT’s Facilities.................................................................................... 2 Goals ....................................................................................................................... 2 Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................... 4 Issues and Opportunities ....................................................................................... 11 The Users of ACLT Lands......................................................................................... 14 Identified Facility Needs ............................................................................................. 16 Chapter 2: Proposed Structures................................................................................... 19 Options Considered ............................................................................................... 19 Evaluation of Options ............................................................................................. 21 Recommended Approach for New Structures............................................................ 23 Assumptions .......................................................................................................... 24 Recommended Actions .......................................................................................... 24 Utilities....................................................................................................................... 25 Trails and Boardwalks ............................................................................................... 27 Signage and Entrance ............................................................................................... 30 Chapter 3: Interpretive Development ............................................................................ 31 Introduction................................................................................................................ 31 Interpretive documents and resources reviewed:................................................... 32 Interpretive Objectives............................................................................................... 32 Interpretive Program and Services Objectives........................................................... 33 I. Site Orientation................................................................................................... 33 II. Land Preservation.............................................................................................. 33 III. Connecting People with the Land....................................................................... 34 IV. Land Stewardship ............................................................................................. 34 Interpretive Theme: ................................................................................................... 34 Market Analysis......................................................................................................... 35 Target User Group Marketing ................................................................................ 36 Marketing a New Brand?........................................................................................ 37 What’s in a Name? ................................................................................................. 37 The Next Marketing Steps...................................................................................... 38 Review of Near-by Interpretive Sites and the ACLT “niche”. ...................................... 39 Calvert County – Cypress Swamp Nature Center .................................................. 39 Calvert County – Flag Ponds ................................................................................. 39 Calvert County – Kings Landing ............................................................................. 39 Calvert Cliffs State Park ......................................................................................... 39 Jefferson Patterson Park ....................................................................................... 40 The ACLT “niche”. ................................................................................................. 40 ACLT Interpretive Site Resource Inventory ............................................................... 41 Interpretive Opportunities – Inventory and Analysis ............................................... 41 Interpretive Media Mix and Opportunities – total site interpretation options. ............ 42 Chapter 4: Phasing and Costs of Structures and Interpretation .................................. 45 Implementation Phasing and Cost Estimate Matrix for Structures .............................. 45 Implementation Phasing and Cost Estimate Matrix for Interpretation .......................... 46 Potential Funding Sources ......................................................................................... 53 Appendix Inventory of Interpretive Sites with Recommendations and Barn Structure
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Page
iv
Acknowledgements ACLT Board of Directors Dr. Edward U. Graham, President Patrick J. Griffin, Vice President Paul L. Berry, Treasurer Col. Caroline E. VanMason, USA (Ret.), Secretary Dr. Denise Breitburg Dr. Carolyn Ebel Marcy Damon Dr. David F. Farr James B. Greene, Jr. RADM,USN (Ret) Steve Kullen John Little Gary Loew Steve Stadelman Peter N. Stathis Randi Vogt ACLT Staff Karen H. Edgecombe, Executive Director Elizabeth J. Stoffel, Land Manager Joy V. Woppert, Community Relations Coordinator ACLT Master Planning Committee Joy Bartholomew Denise Breitburg Karen Edgecombe Carl Fleischhauer Ted Graham Ewing Miller Steve Peters Liz Stoffel Caroline VanMason Randi Vogt Cheryl Branagan, Project Coordinator, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network (contributor) Plan Prepared By: Lardner/Klein Landscape Architects, P.C. Jim Klein, ASLA Sarah Couchman, ASLA Elisabeth Lardner, ASLA, AICP Consultants Lisa Siri, ASLA, SIRI, LLC Christine Leonard, AIA, Crafted Architecture John Veverka & Associates (Author, Chapter 3)
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 1
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Chapter 1: Vision, Goals, and Existing Conditions Introduction The purpose of the ACLT Facilities and Interpretive Planning effort is twofold. First it is intended to determine the location and nature of future facilities to best meet ACLT’s operational, outreach, and stewardship requirements. Second it is designed to define a comprehensive and compelling interpretive program to best serve ACLT’s mission.
Mission of the American Chestnut Land Trust ACLT’s mission is threefold: 1. We promote land conservation throughout Calvert County, Maryland. 2. We provide environmentally sustainable public access to our preserved properties for educational, scientific, recreational and cultural purposes. 3. We protect the natural and cultural resources of the Parkers Creek and Governors Run watersheds for the benefit of this and future generations.
Planning Process In 2009, The Board of Directors of the American Chestnut Land Trust formed a master plan committee to select and work with a consultant to develop the master plan for facilities and a second consultant to develop the interpretive program. In November of 2009, ACLT hired Lardner/Klein Landscape Architects, P.C. to develop the master plan. In May 2010, ACLT hired John Veverka and Associates to develop the interpretive program. Both efforts are combined into this Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation. Members of the master plan committee and staff toured the site and met three times with Lardner/Klein to develop a preliminary vision statement and set of goals; to identify potential facility needs; and to identify alternative approaches and select a preferred approach to meeting those future facility needs. Lardner/Klein presented the alternatives at the annual membership meeting. A facilitated discussion followed to gain further insight into the potential issues and opportunities associated with the various alternatives under study. The ACLT Board met after the membership meeting to review the master plan committee and members’ input and requested that Lardner/Klein develop cost estimates for two options: one focusing development at the North Side Trailhead and the other focusing development at the South Side Trailhead. The resulting draft plan for facilities was utilized as a starting point for the interpretive program development. The interpretive planning effort started with a planning workshop with ACLT staff, committee members and interested stakeholders resulting in an overall set of interpretive objectives. This was followed by a market analysis, a thorough interpretive site resource inventory and an analysis of interpretive opportunities leading to the development of an interpretive master plan that is included in this report as Chapter 3. The implementation and phasing matrix for the plan is included in Chapter 4.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 2
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A Vision for ACLT’s Facilities The committee identified the following statements to guide the development and implementation of the plan: The land protected and managed by the American Chestnut Land Trust in the Parkers Creek Preserve • Is a place where people can come learn about and experience the natural and cultural history of Parkers Creek • Is accessible to a wide range of users including neighbors, school and camp groups, families of all ages and abilities, visitors to Calvert County, researchers, artists, photographers, and, on a limited basis, hunters and mountain bicyclists; • Maintains a high quality natural area experience while providing environmentally sustainable public access • Is managed in a manner that demonstrates good resource stewardship including natural area management, preservation of cultural resources, and sustainable agriculture • Utilizes local materials and labor whenever possible • Is a cornerstone of the county-wide “green infrastructure” and open space system • Is protected habitat for wildlife, rare, threatened and endangered species, and forest interior dwelling birds. As perceived by the ACLT Board of Directors and Executive Director, ACLT (1) offers a high quality natural area, offering a “wilderness” or “old growth forest” experience; (2) demonstrates good resource stewardship through its natural resource management practices, including invasive plant control, preservation of cultural resources (including the cemetery and barn restoration), and sustainable agricultural practices through its community supported agriculture (CSA); and, (3) educates the public about the importance of a stewardship ethic by example and through hands on experience by volunteers.
Goals The following goals, organized by issue area, will help to measure and evaluate the implementation of the plan’s recommendations as they evolve into more detailed levels of planning and design. TRAILS AND RELATED INTERPRETATION • Use the trails to tell the stories associated with the Parkers Creek Watershed • Organize the interpretive opportunities associated with the trails in the watershed to tell a coordinated story of the many overlays of natural and cultural history and to emphasize ACLT’s stewardship message • Increase the trail opportunities for elderly and disabled visitors ACCESS TO PARKERS CREEK AND RELATED INTERPRETATION • Increase both visual and physical access to Parkers Creek within the limitations of conservation easements and terms of the management agreements between ACLT and Maryland Department of Natural Resources FACILITIES/STRUCTURES AND RELATED INTERPRETATION • Increase opportunities for outdoor group activities with a covered space
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 3
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve • • • • •
Increase opportunities for natural and cultural resource interpretation with an emphasis on stewardship Where feasible, provide multi-function spaces to serve multiple objectives The character of structures should be consistent with the vernacular building forms found along the Western Shore of the Chesapeake Bay Structures should demonstrate the principles of low impact development and consider certification by the US Green Building Council (LEED) Maintain a physical presence on both the north and south sides at all times
COMMUNITY SUPPORTED AGRICULTURE AND RELATED INTERPRETATION • Utilize existing agricultural lands to demonstrate sustainable agricultural practices • Increase the opportunities to teach visitors about where their food comes from and its nutritional value and the benefits of locally and sustainably grown foods • Provide opportunities for visitors and supporters to engage in the process of growing food CULTURAL SITES AND RELATED INTERPRETATION • Stabilize and then plan for future preservation needs of existing cultural sites • Convey the importance of cultural preservation • Cultural history should be interpreted on both sides of Parkers Creek VEHICULAR ACCESS AND PARKING AND RELATED INTERPRETATION • Expand vehicular access and parking to accommodate the needs of educational groups and activities • Reduce the impact of vehicular access and parking by utilizing low impact development techniques • Add directional (wayfinding) and orientation signage
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 4
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Existing Conditions The American Chestnut Land Trust (ACLT) manages over 3,000 acres of land located within the Parkers Creek Watershed south and east of Prince Frederick, Maryland. The preserve is one of eight county, state, and nongovernmental organization natural areas or parks offering natural and cultural resource interpretation that are open to the public in Calvert County. The other seven Figure 1: Parkers Creek include King’s Landing Park, Battle Creek Cypress Swamp, Flag Ponds Nature Park, Calvert Cliffs State Park, Jefferson Patterson Park and Museum, Annmarie Gardens and Calvert Marine Museum. (See Figure 2.) ACLT-owned and -managed lands are designated as part of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network, a partnership system of parks, refuges, museums, historic sites, and water trails spanning the watershed. According to the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network: Parkers Creek Watershed Nature Preserve protects one of the last remaining pristine watersheds on the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay. Located just north of Calvert Cliffs in southern Maryland, nearly 3,000 acres are conserved and managed here by the American Chestnut Land Trust. The brackish tidal stream known as Parkers Creek meanders through salt marsh to the Bay's shoreline. Visitors to the preserve may walk more than 15 miles of trails, exploring hardwood forests, farmland, wetlands, salt marsh, Chesapeake shoreline and the Creek itself. Guided canoe trips of the Creek are also offered. Much of the remaining non-ACLT managed land within the Parkers Creek Watershed is protected through similar mechanisms including lands owned in fee simple by Calvert County, privately-owned land protected by conservation easements held by ACLT and/or other organizations, and privately-owned farms enrolled in the Calvert County Agricultural Land Preservation Program. Figure 3 illustrates the status of land preservation within the Parkers Creek Watershed (Spring 2010).
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 5
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Figure 3
Figure 3: Parkers Creek Watershed The crossPlan hatched with green and background are lands owned by ACLT - the focus of this master planning effort Master fortone Facilities Interpretation May 2011
Page 6
Page 7
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve The lands owned and managed by ACLT are found on both sides of Parkers Creek. Remnants of the original bridge over Parkers Creek can still be seen. However, the two sides (north and south) are no longer physically connected. Existing facilities on the north side (see Figure 9) include Double Oak – the existing farm house previous uses of which have included a hunting lodge and the caretaker’s house –currently serving as the ACLT office (Figure 4). Trailhead and storage building – this existing shed was adapted for use as the north side trailhead. The sign board includes information about ACLT and a trail map. A portable toilet is also available for trail users (Figure 5). Picnic Shelter – this former dog kennel has been adapted for use as a picnic shelter. It has a concrete floor but is too small for much more than a handful of people to use (Figure 6) Farm – approximately an acre of the existing farm field at Double Oak is currently being used for a community supported agriculture program (Figure 7). A small, open-sided field washing station currently serves as the produce distribution point with water for irrigation and field washing supplied by the Double Oak farm house well. Trails and interpretation – there are approximately seven miles of trails accessed from the north side trailhead. Trail intersections and starting points are identified with small numbered posts. Interpretive signs have been installed along the Parkers Creek Loop Trail providing information about both the natural and cultural history of the area (Figure 8). A planned threemile addition to the north side trails is in the development stage that will connect Prince Frederick with the Bay Overlook now under design.
Figure 4: Double Oak Farm House
Figure 5: Existing trailhead – north side
Figure 6: Existing picnic shelter
Figure 7: Existing farming operation
Figure 8:Existing interpretation along trail (DSC_1070x.jpg
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 8
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve Figure 10 identifies the location of facilities on the south side. Facilities on the south side include South trailhead and privy – the south side trailhead is a barn with a side porch that is also used for storage of maintenance equipment (Figure 11). A privy is located a short distance away. Information about ACLT and a trail map is found on the porch. South Side Trails – approximately six miles of trails are accessed from the south side trailhead providing access to the each of the cultural features as well as the Beaver Dam (described below). The East Loop Trail is the only ACLTmanaged trail where mountain bicycling is allowed. Hance-Chesley Farm – the farm has been occupied by different families over the years, including some buried in the cemetery (Figure 12) on the property. ACLT and the Calvert County Garden Club have made a number of repairs and improvements to the cemetery, winning a Calvert County historic preservation award in 2005. Beaver Dam and Swamp Trail with boardwalk (Figure 13) – the boardwalk was flooded and is now being reconstructed by volunteers (Boy Scouts) Lemuel Wallace Homestead and Lemuel Wallace Farm – this was the home of an African American farmer who owned about one hundred acres from 1909 until the mid-1930s. Volunteers repaired and stabilized the former dwelling and the log corn crib (Figure 14). Howard-White Barn – ACLT volunteers repaired the Howard-White barn (Figure 15) on stray weekends from 2003-2008. The project received a Calvert County historic preservation award in 2009. Warrior's Rest Sanctuary – the 235-acre area managed by ACLT, as well as the beaches and the majority of the marshes surrounding Parkers Creek, have limited public access as required by the landowner, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources.
Figure 11: South side trail head and storage area
Figure 12: Historic marker at cemetery
Figure 13: Beaver dam inundating the Swamp Trail
Figure 14: Lemuel Wallace Homestead and corn crib (left)
Figure 15: Howard-White Barn
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Double Oak Farm House
Future Overlook
North Storage Shed
Dares B e
ad o R ach
D ou
Turkey Spur Trail Overlook
ble O
ak R
oa d
Old Parkers Creek Road Bridge Site
k jk A I # * j
# * j k
q r
[ e Existing & Planned Features - North
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust Calvert County, Maryland Lardner/Klein Landscape Architects, P.C. The planimetric information shown on this plan is based on copyrighted GIS Data from Calvert County, Maryland and may not be copied or reproduced without express written permission from the Board of County Commissioners of Calvert County, Maryland or their designee. Calvert County GIS Data contains proprietary information belonging exclusively to the Board of County Commissioners of Calvert County, Maryland. Additional GIS data was provided by the American Chestnut Land Trust, Maryland State Highway Administration, and Maryland Department of Natural Resources.
0
500
1,000
2,000
3,000
Feet 4,000
o
LEGEND
ACLT Conservation Land MD DNR Land ACLT Easement Other Protected Land Existing Trail Proposed Trail Wetlands
[ e j
Cultural Feature Natural Feature
j k
Structure
q r
Viewpoint
Hance-C
A Parking I
# * * #
[ e
Ho
Trailhead Proposed Trailhead
Figure 9
a e p a s e h C
j k
q r
[ e
Beaver activity
Hance-Chesley Cemetery Howard-White Barn
[ e j
[ e
P ar
[k e j Cr
May 2011
Calvert County, Maryland
Lardner/Klein Landscape Architects, P.C. The planimetric information shown on this plan is based on copyrighted GIS Data from Calvert County, Maryland and may not be copied or reproduced without express written permission from the Board of County Commissioners of Calvert County, Maryland or their designee. Calvert County GIS Data contains proprietary information belonging exclusively to the Board of County Commissioners of Calvert County, Maryland. Additional GIS data was provided by the American Chestnut Land Trust, Maryland State Highway Administration, and Maryland Department of Natural Resources.
500
1,000
2,000
3,000
Feet 4,000
o
# *
a
S ci e
d
American Chestnut Land Trust
dR oad
oa
Isla n
Cli f t s
o R s f
nti
on's
kR ee
olom
Existing & Planned Features - South
0
d
rs ke
S. S
* I# A
LEGEND
ACLT Conservation Land MD DNR Land ACLT Easement Other Protected Land Existing Trail Proposed Trail Wetlands
[ e j
Cultural Feature Natural Feature
j k
Structure
q r
Viewpoint
A I
Parking
# * * #
Privy (Gravatt Lane)
Trailhead Proposed Trailhead
Lemuel Wallace Homesite Figure 10
Page 11
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Issues and Opportunities The master planning committee identified a number of issues that needed to be addressed as part of the master plan for facilities and interpretation: North Side Issues: • Arrival and Orientation for the trail user Visitors coming to the north trailhead are confused by the appearance of Double Oak when first arriving, thinking that it is a private residence. In addition, once they park at the end of the drive and look at the trailhead map, it is still confusing in terms of how to find the trailhead (Signs are blocked and difficult to understand.), and the level of difficulty is not clear (especially for older visitors who may be concerned about what they are getting in to). • Opportunities for the less ambulatory There is a clear need for a sturdy and stable trail of short length that provides a glimpse of what is found at ACLT that is accessible for disabled and elderly persons. This can be accomplished in tandem with providing better equipment access to the farm fields with a Figure 16: Turkey Trail path around the perimeter of the fields and better signage indicating the degree of difficulty of trails as they lead off from the trailhead. • Coordinating the interpretive story The existing interpretive signs are aging and need replacement. This would be a good opportunity to develop interpretive media that can be less intrusive and better matched to the conditions being interpreted. For a full discussion of interpretive opportunities, see Chapter 3, and the evaluations of each interpretive site opportunity in the Appendix. Figure 17: ACLT is responsible for management of the • Creating viewing opportunities Goldstein Tract through land leases for agriculture Plans and funding are already in place to P6250376.JPG construct a viewing platform at the terminus of the Bay Overlook Trail. Additional opportunities include the site at the end of the Turkey Spur Trail, the site at the end of Double Oak Road Trail, and the area associated with a potential pedestrian bridge at the Old Bridge site. • Accommodating existing and future facility needs The Double Oak Farmhouse, currently used as an office, could accommodate all or some of the future facility needs but may require modifications to more efficiently meet those needs including expanding the meeting room, providing related indoor/outdoor spaces for events and meetings. The expanding needs for the farm operations may require a new barn and related infrastructure (water, waste, and electrical).
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 12
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
South Side Issues: • The need for expanded storage and educational facilities The primary facility needs on the south side are the need for more storage areas for land management (perhaps double the current size) and the need for more covered and perhaps enclosed space for education and training. The potential need to support a larger facility on the south side would require a well, septic, and electrical. Currently the south side is only served by the nearby outhouse. • Land management issues The primary land management activities currently undertaken include mowing the existing meadows (abandoned tobacco fields) at least once a year and management of non-native invasive species north of the trailhead (vines) and east of the trailhead (bamboo) at the old Frog Pond where there is interest in restoring the ponds and native vegetation. Forest management plans have been prepared for each of the tracts. Forests are managed for protection/conservation of habitat for forest interior dwelling species. Trees are only cut away from the trail to keep the trail open. • Trail management issues Portions of the yellow trail have been flooded out due to beaver dam activity. Boy scouts are rebuilding the boardwalk at a higher elevation to reestablish the connection. There is interest in constructing a new trail to give better visual access to the beaver dam, but the adjoining hillsides are steep. There is an existing overlook and memorial bench at the top of the adjoining slope to the beaver dam (east side). Figure 18: Bamboo has been cleared away from the • Interpretive Opportunities The cemetery is the primary site available “Frog Pond” to tell the story of the pre-Civil War period. Other opportunities include early twentieth century African American settlement and tobacco heritage. The namesake American chestnut tree has generated new seedlings, but most die after a few years. American chestnut tree has been found nearby and has been flagged. This may be the best place to interpret the land trust name. Figure 19: View through trees toward the Swamp Trail
See Chapter 3 for a full discussion of interpretive opportunities and the Appendix for a site by site description and recommendations.
Figure 20: Parkers Creek shoreline
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 13
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Easements and Limitations (north and south sides): • DNR properties are controlled by deed restrictions stipulating trail use only (but not equestrian trails). The language governing DNR properties, as well as Maryland Environmental Trust conservation easements placed on some ACLTowned properties, allow for agricultural use as well as educational uses. A management agreement between DNR and ACLT stipulates the management goal for DNR properties as being “the protection of sensitive ecosystems and rare, threatened and endangered species.” Other uses such as environmental and biological research, environmental education, scientific research and interpretation of cultural resources are allowed “as long as these activities are conducted in a controlled manner and do not compromise the primary goal of Natural Resource Protection.” Small structures (less than 500 square feet) can be constructed for educational or research purposes only with permission from DNR. Major maintenance of existing buildings is the responsibility of DNR. Parkers Creek Issues: • Warrior’s Rest Sanctuary The 235-acre cliff- and creek-front area is managed by ACLT for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR). DNR rules limit public access to Warrior’s Rest and to adjacent beaches and marshland in order to protect rare or endangered species. Twelve public access opportunities per year are allowed from Warriors Rest, the majority of which are utilized for guided, educational canoe trips on Parkers Creek. • Crossing Parkers Creek The old bridge site presents an important opportunity to reconnect the north and south sides with a pedestrian bridge, thereby greatly expanding the visitor experience options (day long hikes, for example). Concerns were raised by some members about the potential intrusion on the experience of being on Parkers Creek in a canoe or kayak, described as a “near wilderness” experience. • Shoreline Access and Degradation As with any shoreline area, constant use has had some impact on sensitive species. A raised boardwalk trail (or alternatively a log boardwalk) should be considered to reduce that impact while at the same time providing access for birding and other interpretive and educational opportunities.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
Figure 21: View from mouth of Parker’s Creek from below Warrior’s Rest towards site of future overlook
Figure 22: Existing structure at Warrior’s Rest
Figure 23: Canoe storage at Warrior’s Rest
May 2011
Page 14
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
The Users of ACLT Lands Many different visitors and groups use ACLT lands for a variety of activities. The following is a list of the types of users already involved with ACLT, many of whom are not typical users of a traditional natural area or park. As a membership organization, ACLT offers users a sense of “community ownership” and personal engagement that, in and of itself, is an important “human” resource worthy of continued support. Natural Resource Studies and Research Birding Study of spring ephemeral plants Water quality monitoring (samples collected provide 10 years of baseline data) Entomological research Native plant species research Herpetological species research Cultural Resources Studies and Research Studies of agricultural and forestry practices over time Studies of vernacular architecture Studies of family history and genealogy Archaeological surveys Genealogical study Recreational Users Self-guided and guided hikes Mountain bicyclists – south side designated trails Cross country skiers on rare snow days American Volksport Association and other hiking clubs – walking events High school cross country Canoeists – guided with limited number of visits allowable Photographers and artists Educational Users and Summer Programs Schools – art classes, some school science classes Summer camps (e.g. Potomac Overlook Park summer program) Training programs Farm-related school programs Events and Group Activities Auction (held off-site) Annual Membership Meeting (held off-site) Trail Maintenance Day and Picnic Greens Sale & Beach Hayride at Warrior’s Rest Volunteer Appreciation Dinner (held outside in a tent) Family Day or Farm-related event Earth Day o Roadside cleanup o Trail work o Memorial Bench o Big picnic
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 15
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve Undesirable Users and Uses (requiring monitoring) ATVs Fossil collectors who dig in the Calvert Cliffs Poachers Beach parties/campfires
Resource Management and Volunteer Programs Invasive plant control/management Warrior’s Rest arboretum maintenance Hance-Chesley cemetery maintenance Barn and building maintenance Trail maintenance Hunting programs (deer herd management) Community-supported agriculture o Big garden on north side o Bees o Potential for fruits and nuts on south side o Mixed interest in animals Road and parking maintenance o Double Oak Lane and North Trailhead Parking o South Trailhead Parking o Driveway at Warrior’s Rest o County road maintenance for access (coordination) Forest management plans (in place on all ACLT-owned properties) o Managing for forest interior dwelling species o Some wood salvage for local use if accessible (Oak, Old Chestnut, Locust) Event-related volunteers Guided Canoe Trips Guided Hikes
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 16
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Identified Facility Needs The management of a membership-based organization, whose mission includes the stewardship of over three thousand acres of land, and connecting people with the land through access and through volunteer opportunities, is more complex than just keeping a few trails open to visitors. Given the mission of ACLT, the wide range of users and uses that are already taking place on ACLT-managed lands, and the inadequacy of existing facilities to meet the basic needs associated with achieving the mission and meeting the needs of current users, ACLT should plan for and seek funding for a limited expansion of existing facilities. In addition, ACLT should work towards a moderate expansion of existing facilities to accommodate future needs as part of a longer-term phased expansion. The following describes both the short-term and longer-term facility needs. One of the goals for ACLT is to expand opportunities for interpretation, education, and volunteer involvement by finding ways to increase the amount of enclosed meeting, special event, and educational space. The Facilities Plan Committee agreed that the larger events (such as the annual membership meeting and the auction) will have to continue to be held off-site, but events with 75 or fewer people (such as Trail Maintenance Day, Earth Day, the Volunteer Appreciation Dinner, and any new farmrelated events) could be accommodated on site with some strategically sited and designed additions to the existing farmhouse on the north side. In addition, this limited type of expansion could also accomplish another goal, improving the appearance of the north side entrance area so that it looks and functions more like a land preserve open to the public rather than a private residence. The following facility needs have been identified as integral to the mission of ACLT and form the basis for the development of the facilities master plan:
Office space – Staff needs include both membership support services as well as land management support services. The master plan assumes that there will be an ongoing need for four offices (one for flexible use by part-time staff or volunteers), and a land management office that brings together all the land management files, maps and reference materials in one area.
Flexible educational/meeting/event space – Creating greater flexibility in the use of the existing meeting room would enhance its value to the membership and visitors. The multi-purpose room could better accommodate training sessions for volunteers, talks on issues important to the ACLT mission, board and committee meetings, as well as smaller events with greater flexibility. More flexibility can be achieved by adding on a covered porch or deck and providing better indoor to outdoor relationships (such as double width “French” or sliding glass doors.) The design could also be done in such a way as to allow for future additions to make a larger indoor room. Based on industry standards, approximately 15 square feet of floor area per person should be allocated for places of assembly used for the types of uses envisioned for ACLT. The existing meeting room is approximately 28-feet x 28feet or 784 square feet. Using 15 square feet per person, the meeting room would need to be expanded to a minimum of 1,125 square feet (net area). Allocating for the various inefficiencies of adding on to an existing structure, approximately 1,350 square feet should be allocated for accommodating 75
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 17
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
people. By adding an additional 600 square feet to the existing meeting room, these events could be accommodated. The room could also be designed in such a way to be used for other multiple purposes such as an exhibit, training, or other educational activities. The goal of accommodating events up to 75 people can be met through the expanded covered porch and/or deck with good indoor/outdoor relationships to the existing farmhouse. The investment in the covered porch and deck could be recouped in several years by minimizing future needs for tent rentals (currently of $9,400 per year for four events).
Secure storage for property and resource management – there is a need for additional storage space for land management equipment. On the south side, space is needed for approximately twice the space as the current barn holds. On the north side the equipment is scattered in multiple places and could be consolidated into one location. It may be possible to combine the storage needs with the CSA needs on the north side (see secure storage for agriculture below).
Agricultural operations – the current (2010) CSA operation includes1/3 of an acre of fenced in production providing vegetables for 13 shareholders plus extras for occasional buyers and sales to one restaurant. An area about 50’x150' behind the fenced field is currently used for compost, mulch and water infrastructure. There is an existing shed adjacent to the field measuring 10x15' for processing vegetables and supplies. This has recently been expanded to 1+ acre of fenced in area, including space for a “hoop house” that has been ordered. Production is to be expanded to 35 shares in 2011. Part of the available space in the two existing outbuildings is used for storage of tools and equipment. The CSA operation uses the Calverton School's greenhouse for seed starting as well as a cold frame at a private residence (Jeff Klapper’s). Indoor seed starting is also accommodated in the front windows of the office meeting room. An 800-foot long, 2-inch PVC pipe runs from the office to the field for irrigation. It is assumed that the farm operations have more than enough room for expansion in the existing field. A new well and electrical supply for may be needed in the future. (See discussion below regarding the multi-purpose barn for future needs).
Meadow Management – the land to the north of the existing CSA operation should be maintained as an open meadow for the purpose of diversifying the bird habitat and offering related interpretive opportunities.
Multi-purpose Barn with covered north side trailhead pavilion, secure storage for agriculture and restrooms – a north side barn should be considered to consolidate all of the operations noted above by providing a central location for storing agricultural equipment, supplies, restrooms, a trailhead, and for providing space for volunteers to get out of the sun, etc. The size of the barn needed is assumed to be (30’ x 60’ footprint with 10’ porches on the two long sides). Diagrams for a proposed barn are included in the report Appendix. Alternatively, a barn could be salvaged and relocated to the site. The porches should be designed in such a manner as to provide outdoor covered space for multiple purposes including a trailhead and interpretive area, food distribution, and for small training events or other volunteer activities. The indoor space could be designed for larger events (30’ x 40’) and separate, secure
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 18
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
equipment storage (30’ x 20’). A timber frame-style construction would permit future expansion in 10’ sections. Renting the current sanitary facilities (port-a-jon) costs $1,000 dollars per year and it is not used much due to its unappealing condition. The outside restrooms could be incorporated into this multi-purpose barn structure using a Clivus Multrum system or similar composting toilet facility. Electric utility needs for the multi-purpose barn structure should be accommodated through the use of photovoltaic panels as the site has excellent solar access.
On the south side, the covered portion of the south side barn currently serves as the current south side trailhead and an outhouse is located at the far edge of the small field. A small expansion to the south side barn may be needed for longrange storage needs, but is not a priority.
Outdoor exhibits for interpretation - the current signs are out of date and detract from the trailside experience. Ideally, new exhibits should be installed as part of the outdoor covered trailhead pavilion on the north side, and potentially as part of an expanded barn on the south side. See Chapter 3 for a discussion of these needs.
Viewing structure at Bay Overlook with interpretive elements – part of the Prince Frederick to the Bay Overlook trail, this structure is already funded and under design.
Boardwalks and trail-related structures – boardwalks are needed in places where the trail parallels the water’s edge or along wetlands where damage is visible. The current log boardwalks are suitable but require more maintenance over time. In some places, especially along the north side of Parkers Creek at the end of the trails, a boardwalk solution may be needed to minimize damage to aquatic habitats. Boardwalks can be installed with screw piles to minimize construction impact.
Bridge over Parkers Creek – the long-term goal for the watershed is to have both an east-west through trail and a north-south through trail. A bridge would be needed to accommodate the north-south trail. Existing personal security issues with adjoining properties on the south side must be addressed prior to rebuilding a bridge across Parkers Creek.
ATV vehicular control – current fencing and gates appear to be adequate for ATV vehicle control. Should future unauthorized ATV use expand, a style system may need to be put in place with additional board fencing extending across the existing roads to either a physical barrier or to a distance where it no longer is desirable (on a case-by-case basis).
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Page 19
Chapter 2: Proposed Structures Evaluation of Alternatives The first decision facing the ACLT Board and its members is to identify an appropriate level of facility development – one that is consistent with its mission as a conservation organization – and second, to prioritize the areas where the ACLT Board and its membership should focus their attention. The appropriate level of new facilities is dependent upon the relationship of benefit to cost. For a membership-based organization cost is a limiting factor based upon the amount of money that can be raised from member donations or if grants or other sources of funds can be obtained. Increasing membership often requires additional facilities. Since determining the relationship between the potential for growth in membership and outside funding with the need for facilities is not an exact science, the recommendations for this master plan for facilities identifies a series of decision points that can be related to need over time. The determination of need can evolve over time. The other decision that must be made then is primarily one of geography. Should ACLT focus on the development of facilities on the north or south side? Should ACLT give priority to its needs for land management or for education and interpretation – or a little bit of both?
Options Considered A range of choices was evaluated for accommodating the needed program identified on pages [16-18] and relating that to the growth and development of the organization. The choices were narrowed down from the original range of ideas presented at the membership meeting to the following distinct options. Option 1: Office in Town One of the ideas from some of the members was to move the office into town. However, this presents several problems: 1) it removes a physical presence on the site (that could be overcome with the renovation of Double Oak as a caretaker residence); 2) it would require either the additional purchase of a downtown property or the leasing of a building which would extensively increase the operating costs (although money raised to renovate Double Oak or construct a new structure could also be raised for a downtown facility, it would not benefit the property that ACLT already owns); and 3) the downtown location presents a logistical problem for land management activities and does not resolve the training, educational and volunteer-related facility needs that typically take place on-site. This idea, although very sound from a smart growth point of view, would create additional burdens on staff and not meet as many of the other facility needs. Option 2: North Side Emphasis All of the facilities would be accommodated on the north side with the exception of an expanded barn on the south side. There is physically more space on the north side to accommodate future facility needs including small groups in a manner that will not impact the immediate neighbors. The existing structure is already supported with well, septic, and electric utilities. Renovating the existing ACLT office building at Double Oak to accommodate additional flexible educational/meeting/event space is considered more
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Page 20
septic, and electric utilities. Renovating the existing ACLT office building at Double Oak to accommodate additional flexible educational/meeting/event space is considered more environmentally friendly than new construction and would also provide an opportunity to solve one of Double Oak’s limitations by enhancing its visual character to one that is more in keeping with its current use as a natural area, open to the public. The committee suggested that several renovation alternatives could be explored that would accommodate small to medium-sized groups. These renovation options are discussed on page 24 below.
Figure 24 – Proposed modifications to Double Oak incorporating a covered porch and deck to accommodate groups in addition to a modified roof
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Page 21
Option 3: South Side Emphasis For this option, the operations office, meeting space/education/training rooms, enclosed exhibit space, and storage would be moved to the south side in a new building located close to the existing parking area. The existing south side barn would need to be relocated to accommodate the above facility needs. The Double Oak farmhouse would be converted to a caretaker residence. The north side barn would also be constructed and used for all agricultural needs as well as north side land management needs. The north side outdoor covered trailhead pavilion would continue to be constructed on the north side.
Figure 25 – Sketch illustrating a new visitor facility considered for the south side as option 3
Evaluation of Options The following table compares Option 2 (North Side Emphasis) with Option 3 (South Side Emphasis). Option 1, locating facilities in town is discussed on page 19. The table below compares a number of issues for facilities on either the north side (Option 2) or the south side (Option 3). The issues include: Site Considerations – the amount of space available, adjacent land use considerations, and relationship to agricultural lands Utilities – the presence or absence of existing utilities (on-site waste and water) Design Issues – can the available building footprint accommodate the space requirements for new facilities, and what kind of design opportunities or limitations does the site present to the building design Environmental – what kind of opportunities are available to introduce LEED and Sustainable Sites Initiatives into the design Social – how will the new facility fit in with the social fabric of the community Interpretive Opportunities – what kind of relationship does the site have with the adjacent landscape in order to capture interpretive opportunities within the core area of the facility Cost Factors – what kind of cost considerations need to be accounted for
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Issue Site Considerations
North Side Emphasis + There is physically more space on the north side to accommodate future facility needs including small groups in a manner that will not impact the immediate neighbors - Parking would be more dispersed and farther away from the facility + More non-agricultural space is also available for an outdoor pavilion (the lawn area)
Utilities
+ The existing structure at Double Oak is already supported with well, septic tank/drainfield, electrical service (although capacity to support proposed additions has not been studied) - Telecommunications are less than optimal. Current internet access is via satellite; other options may be cost prohibitive.
Design Issues
+ Renovating Double Oak will solve one of its limitations (its appearance to visitors) and may provide an opportunity to enhance its visual character to one more sympathetic to its current use as a natural area open to the public - Retaining existing building structure places limits on what can be accomplished + Renovating Double Oak may provide an opportunity to demonstrate low-impact development techniques on existing rural residences or farm properties + Renovation is considered more environmentally friendly than new construction - Solar access is partially limited by tall trees
Environmental
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
Page 22
South Side Emphasis + Proposed building site is close to the road with space for approximately 18 cars - Size of building may be limited by space available between existing barn, road, existing trees and parking (to minimize impact on field) – barn could be moved but that would add to the disadvantage of the proposed site - Proximity to existing residences was raised as a concern at the membership meeting for any use that would attract a significant amount of additional traffic - Proposed building site would require septic tank-drainfield construction, well, electrical, and telecommunications
+/-
New building could accommodate all operational needs within a single structure (as long as the existing barn could be moved) +/- Design would need to be sensitive and similar to the character defining features of Scientists Cliffs + LEED considerations could be accommodated as part of new building - New building footprint would have to encroach on either agricultural land or the edge of the woodland and require all new materials for same square footage + More solar access on south side than north side
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve Issue Social
Interpretive Opportunities
Cost Factors
Page 23
North Side Emphasis South Side Emphasis + Continuing use of Double Oak + The presence of more active as an office (or reverting it to agricultural use of Double Oak caretaker housing) will provide may provide more of a physical a physical presence at all times presence allowing educational +/- Visitors that come to the north facilities to be expanded to the side are sometimes confused South Side over the longer by the appearance of Double term. Oak Farm as it appears to be a + Closer proximity to Scientists private residence and not the Cliffs may offer community office of ACLT (also an benefits such as closer advantage to renovation as this proximity to ACLT activities can then be solved through and events design) - Double Oak Road is isolated and may not provide the most desirable office presence for ACLT + Proximity to wider variety of + Proximity of site to a wide trails provides more of an variety of cultural resources opportunity to interpret natural provides more of an landscape opportunity to interpret cultural landscape +/- The cost of renovation may +/- Cost of providing utilities may exceed the cost of new outweigh the cost of renovation construction when looking at the amount of funds that may need to be raised to complete the renovation
Based on the above analysis, and without weighting one factor over another, it appears that the north side should be the preferred location (renovating Double Oak) versus the south side (constructing a new facility). While each side offers positives and negatives, the south side’s site and utility considerations present the most difficult constraints. The costs of new utilities, having to move the existing barn (originally a volunteer project), and having to address significant neighborhood concerns about traffic and building a new structure on land that is being preserved for its agricultural and natural resource values outweigh the disadvantages of the more isolated north side (Double Oak).
Recommended Approach for New Structures The recommended approach is to focus resources on making improvements to facilities on the north side, with a modest future expansion of the barn on the south side. The north side emphasis envisions the use of the Double Oak building (expanded) as both the office and as the principle place people gather for meetings, social events and lectures. People who come to Double Oak to hike or to visit the farm would be directed to a trailhead kiosk located beyond the office building. Upon their return, Double Oak could also provide a place to stop and rest on the porch in the shade. Although future investments for facilities are recommended for the north side, both the north and south sides should have a mixture of natural and cultural resource interpretive elements. All of the facilities would be accommodated on the north side with the exception of an expanded barn on the south side. The committee suggested considering renovations to
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Page 24
Double Oak in three scenarios. Partial renovation of the existing Double Oak farmhouse could include: 1.
2. 3.
Constructing an outdoor 17’ x 36’ deck and an 8’ deep covered entrance porch. The deck could have awnings or a roof (as shown in figure 24 below) to accommodate a large group on a seasonal basis using both indoor and outdoor spaces; Enlarging the meeting room with a 14’ x 22’ indoor addition, plus a deck and a covered entrance; Constructing a 30’ x 30’ free-standing pavilion to the Northeast, tied to the meeting room by a bridge.
Assumptions The following assumptions are the basis for any future expansion. a) ACLT’s land holdings and land management commitments will not substantially increase in the foreseeable future, thus permitting staffing to remain at current levels. b) ACLT offices will remain on north side permanently and any future office space will be generated through efficiencies in the way the space is currently utilized (through renovation) c) Large events (over 75 people) shall continue to be provided off-site d) Agricultural operations will expand (currently authorized for 30 shares) resulting in more activity. A new well and power supply will be needed in the near future.
Recommended Actions The following actions are recommended for addressing future facility needs related to new structures on the north side. Two scenarios are proposed depending upon the results of the first action – a more detailed feasibility study of Double Oak: Scenario A – Double Oak expansion is feasible Scenario B – Double Oak expansion is not feasible or limited to energy efficiency and cosmetic changes 1) Study the Feasibility of Expanding Double Oak: Prepare a structural and feasibility analysis of adding on to the Double Oak farmhouse. The study should examine structural requirements of adding on to the existing building including all three options outlined above. The study should examine other issues including the costs and benefits of weatherization, determine the presence or absence of asbestos, lead paint or other environmental quality issues, and determine whether adding on to the existing structure will require foundation and/or structural work to meet building codes and at what cost. Finally the study should examine the condition and capacity of the existing septic fields and water supply to determine if there are any limitations for expanding the use of the facility to handle events of 75 people or less on a limited basis. 2A)
Phase One Expansion of Double Oak (Scenario A) Based on the results of the feasibility study, develop architectural plans for a remodeling and addition to the Double Oak farmhouse. Smaller events (less than 75
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Page 25
people)1 would be accommodated seasonally by modifying the existing meeting room and linking it to a covered porch or deck providing enough combined indoor/outdoor space to handle 75 people. The expansion should also be utilized to transform the appearance of the structure and make it more welcoming to the public. The design should accommodate a future expansion of the building to provide for additional interior meeting and educational spaces. 2B) Limited changes to Double Oak (Scenario B) If expansion is not feasible or desirable based on the results of the Double Oak analysis, then the current use would be maintained and as much of the weatherization and cosmetic work would be done to make the current building as functional as possible. Accommodation of events would be handled as part of the barn facility (see Item #4). 3) Multi-purpose Structure, Scenario A (Barn, Trailhead Kiosk and Restrooms) Construct a new barn (or reconstructed barn salvaged from off-site) to accommodate future agricultural and land management needs, a trailhead/kiosk within the overhang of the barn structure, and a composting toilet (clivus multrum system or similar) for a restroom. Daylighting of the interior of the barn should also be incorporated into the design. Interpretive panels should also be included. Remove the old trailhead, portable toilet and picnic pavilion, relocating parking to those areas, thus opening up the current visitor parking area for a future tent platform and also providing more direct connections and views to the farm and open space. Well and electric service are not currently contemplated, except if the building is used for events or if clivas-type restroom facilities are not permitted (see Scenario B) Power could be provided by photovoltaic panels and battery storage, rather than extending the electric lines. Under this scenario the barn could be built for agricultural and land management/volunteer use only, while events would be held at Double Oak. 4) Barn (North Side – Scenario B) Under the scenario where Double Oak cannot be expanded, the barn would be designed to accommodate agricultural uses, property management/volunteer uses, and be adapted for use as a covered outdoor space for events. Well, septic, and electrical supply would most likely be needed under this scenario. 5) Barn Expansion (South Side) Expand the barn on the south side to increase storage space for land management activities.
Utilities The primary utility needs are for the agricultural operations, and under Scenario B, if events are to be conducted separate from Double Oak. By using a composting toilet facility, the existing port-a-jon can be removed. The utility needs for the agricultural operations include: - Water supply for washing station and irrigation Parking can be provided for temporary events up to 75 people by utilizing a single bay of parking on the central path between the gardens and the meadow as shown on Figure 25 (space for up to 60 cars. Twelve spaces can be fit to the south of the entrance drive and three-four accessible spaces can fit close to Double Oak.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Page 26
- Electric power supply for well pump, electrifying the deer fence, and potentially for light and power equipment
Figure 26: North Side Master Plan
Under Scenario A, the power needs can be provided through photovoltaic applications. Well pumps are commercially available for between $2,000 and $2,500 depending upon demands (see http://www.solarpumps.com/products.html, for example). Farm fencing can be electrified with a $200 unit for every five acres of fenced area. Under Scenario B, where the Barn may serve multiple functions, electrical supply to the barn may be desirable and it may be more cost effective to provide that by extending the distribution line along the existing driveway (right side, entering). At the same time, the educational mission for ACLT should be considered and using alternative sources of power for the barn should be given serious thought as it sends an important message about wise use of natural resources. This may also include providing a means of daylighting the interior of the barn through modifications to the peg barn design and utilizing photovoltaic panels to provide electricity for hot water, lighting, and heat. The “green” features of the structure should also be interpreted to further reinforce the educational mission of ACLT.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 27
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Trails and Boardwalks The current trail system will not be significantly altered in the near term. However, with the construction of the overlook platform and the Prince Frederick to the Bay Overlook Trail, the needs and numbers of users may change. In the long term the north to south watershed trail may also be constructed. In addition to the trailhead/restroom structure, the two primary facilities needed to accommodate these changing needs are: 1) Introductory Trail (Universal Design) As an organization whose mission includes education, ACLT should expand opportunities for those that are very interested in the special qualities of the Parkers Creek Preserve, but are physically unable to walk on the trails. A pathway should be constructed that encircles the existing meadow and provides an interpretive introduction to the watershed and its natural and cultural history. The surface should be constructed with crushed slate or other stone dust that satisfies ADA accessibility criteria (and can also be utilized to access overflow parking for events – along the central pathway between the garden and meadow). Chapter 3, Interpretive Development, provides additional details. 2) Viewing Blind with Interpretation The interpretive concepts for ACLT recommend providing better visual access to the meadow on the north side. This can be accomplished by introducing a structure at the edge of the meadow beyond the beehives (see Figure 26 for recommended location). The character of the structure should be the same combination of “modern but rustic” using locally harvested timber but finished cleanly on the inside incorporating interpretive information about meadow habitat.
Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge, New Mexico Photo: Deborah Richie Oberbillig
Queens State Wildlife Area, Colorado
Red Lion State Wildlife Area, Colorado; Photo: CDOW Figure 25 – Examples of wildlife viewing blinds
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 28
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
3) Boardwalks Along Parkers Creek There are a number of locations along the north side of Parker’s Creek where trail users have encroached into sensitive wetland areas adjacent to the trail. Boardwalk construction should be considered using the least intrusive form of construction. Two types of boardwalks should be considered: Interior wetland areas associated with the tributaries to Parkers Creek can be traversed using a wooden walkway called a puncheon. Illustrated in the United States Forest Service’s Trail Construction and Maintenance Notebook, 2007 Edition, the puncheon should be made from timber found on site, and can be slightly elevated (surface puncheon) or flush with the wetland surface (subsurface puncheon). Refer to the USFS notebook for further information at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/fspubs/07232806/index.htm.
Figure 26 (Trail Construction and Maintenance Notebook, 2007 Edition, pages 82 [above left] and 86 [above right])
Where encroachment occurs along Parkers Creek, a boardwalk with screw piles may be required. The screw piles can be installed sequentially along the boardwalk minimizing impact to the adjoining wetland. Information about the system installed at Huntley Meadows Park in Fairfax County is documented in the case study found at: http://www.abchance.com/resources/liter ature/04-9409.pdf
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
Figure 27 – Helical pier footings (screw piles) shown here at Huntley Meadows allow the trail to be constructed with minimal impact
May 2011
Page 29
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve 4) Bridge Over Parkers Creek In the long-term, as noted on page 13, the old bridge site presents an important opportunity to reconnect the north and south sides with a pedestrian bridge, thereby greatly expanding the visitor experience options (day long hikes, for example). The identification of facility needs also identifies a longterm goal for the watershed for establishing both an east-west through trail and a north-south through trail. A bridge would be needed to accommodate the northsouth trail.
Figure 28 – Piers from the original Parkers Creek Bridge still remain
There are a number of steps that would need to be taken to reestablish the bridge over Parkers Creek: First, the existing personal security issues with adjoining properties on the south side must be addressed prior to rebuilding a bridge across Parkers Creek. Second, a bridge study must be completed to determine the most appropriate way to establish the crossing including addressing environmental, historical, hydraulic, structural, and constructability issues associated with rebuilding a new bridge. For example, alternatives could be looked at for a prefabricated bridge or for a timber bridge. For both options, it needs to be determined as to how construction equipment, materials, and labor can be brought in to the bridge site without damaging the adjoining areas. Two options would be to use the old road or to use a barge. Finally, prior to a bridge being constructed, the approach trails to the bridge from the south must be identified and potentially would need some work including crossing of tributary streams and wetlands. The following diagram illustrates how a prefabricated bridge might appear and function.
Figure 29 – Conceptual illustration of a bridge over Parkers Creek
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 30
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Signage and Entrance One important aspect of the facility plan effort is to utilize the proposed modifications to Double Oak to provide a more inviting and welcoming impression to visitors. Currently, it feels more like a private residence than a semi-public natural area. In addition to the modifications to Double Oak and the consolidation of the storage areas, a new entry sign could provide added benefits to providing your guests with a more reassuring feeling that they are coming to the right place.
Figure 30 – Example of entrance sign Merkle Wildflie Sanctuary, Prince George’s County, MD (DNR)
The sign should incorporate a reference to the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network of which this site is an important part. An example of a sign that is more welcoming is shown at right.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 31
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Chapter 3: Interpretive Development Introduction This interpretive master plan chapter is designed as a companion to the American Chestnut Land Trust’s long-range facilities plans (Chapters 1 and 2) to serve as a tool to guide ACLT in designing exhibits, programs, events, publications and other education and outreach strategies. As noted in Chapter 1, the ACLT manages more than 3,000 acres of land located within the Parkers Creek and Governors Run Watersheds, south and east of Prince Frederick Maryland. ACLT-owned and managed lands are designated as part of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network, a partnership system of parks, refuges, museums, historic sites and water trails spanning the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. According to the NPS Gateway Network website: Parkers Creek Watershed Nature Preserve protects one of the last remaining pristine watersheds of the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay. Located just north of Calvert Cliffs in southern Maryland, nearly 3000 acres are conserved and managed by the American Chestnut Land Trust. The brackish tidal stream known as Parkers Creek meanders through salt marsh to the Bay’s shoreline. Visitors to the preserve may walk more than 15 miles of trails, exploring hardwood forests, farmland, wetlands, salt marsh, Chesapeake shoreline and the Creek itself. Guided canoe trips of the Creek are also offered.
Parkers Creek – the “jewel” of the Parkers Creek Preserve. Photograph courtesy of Alan Eckert
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 32
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Interpretive documents and resources reviewed: The ACLT has been involved with the development of the Parkers Creek Preserve and the protection and management of its many natural and cultural resources for 25 years. In developing this interpretive plan, we used guidelines and information that had been previously developed by ACLT members. The ACLT developed a DRAFT (4/21/10) “Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation” which provided a good deal of guidelines and suggestions built upon in the development of this interpretive master plan. Other documents had in-depth visitor analysis and marketing discussions which were reviewed as part of this plan as well. To that end, we chose to provide a summary of this information, and make some additional marketing recommendations. Resources reviewed and utilized/quoted in this document included: Interviews with ACLT staff and board members The draft Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation document The “Social aspects of sustainability for the ACLT” document ACLT Annual Reports ACLT focus workshop results ACLT Web site Review of other documents in the ACLT Cultural Resources Library.
Interpretive Objectives The following section provides the objectives that ACLT desires interpretation to accomplish. It should be noted that objectives listed can be accomplished in a variety of ways, not just on printed interpretive materials such as trailhead interpretive panels. These objectives can be accomplished via: Live conducted interpretive walks and programs Cell phone interpretive opportunities Web site interpretation of specific sites, programs, or activities Interpretive trailhead signs Interpretive panels Pod casts Self-guiding interpretive brochures and trail guides Outreach programs conducted off-site School group programs/lesson plans
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 33
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Interpretive Program and Services Objectives During or upon completion of their visit, the majority of visitors will: I. Site Orientation
Understand that the American Chestnut Land Trust welcomes the public to experience the Parkers Creek Preserve and to become involved in ACLT’s ongoing stewardship of the land. Learn the history and mission of ACLT. Learn that ACLT is privately funded through member support and grants. Learn about membership benefits of ACLT. Learn about the various volunteer opportunities available at ACLT and how to contact the staff to learn more. Learn about upcoming events, programs, and tours offered by ACLT. Learn that there are two locations they can visit and the key features of both. Learn the estimated “walking times” for each of the trails and which trails are suggested as introductory “interpretive” trails. Learn trail rules and safety precautions.
II. Land Preservation
Understand that this preserve is here because a small group of individuals formed a grassroots land conservation organization at a time when the Calvert County was experiencing tremendous growth and development, with the goal of protecting and preserving the ecological integrity of the Parkers Creek watershed for the benefit of future generations. Learn how Parkers Creek Preserve benefits the community and region. Understand what a “watershed” is and how it functions. Understand the Parkers Creek watershed’s connection with the Chesapeake Bay. Be impressed by the fact that in a short 1 ½ mile stretch of Parkers Creek that is navigable we can see all of the typical habitats represented in the larger Chesapeake Bay watershed. Understand the importance of preserving large, contiguous blocks of forested land to provide: - habitat for forest interior dwelling birds; - a demonstration area allowed to revert to old growth status; - diverse plant and animal communities; - opportunities for people to experience the advantages of open space for recreation, relaxation, solitude, solace, etc.; - other environmental functions the forest serves such as water quality protection Understand the importance of preserving large, intact, functioning wetlands and the environmental functions they serve. Understand the difference between preservation and conservation and why we need both.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 34
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
III. Connecting People with the Land
Understand what our two landscapes (north and south of Parkers Creek) tell us and how they illustrate a diversity of stories about the history of our ever changing landscapes and relationship to Chesapeake Bay. Have a sense of how the land was used in the past and how those who worked the land lived. Appreciate Calvert County’s agricultural heritage. Better understand what is involved in cultivating and producing food. Learn about the succession from forest to farm fields and back to forest. Feel a stronger personal connection to the land and nature in general. Learn what an “old growth forest” is, and be motivated to explore and enjoy our forests as they revert to old growth. See examples of how the forest habitats are areas “not to be feared” (new visitors – urban visitors). Feel that Parkers Creek Preserve is a place to escape the stresses of the world, relax and reconnect with the natural world. Learn that there are new things to see, discover and experience here every day. Understand how the various habitats here change and transform over the seasons. Feel that this area is a hidden natural treasure. Be encouraged to support research and programs related to increasing our understanding and sustainable enjoyment of the natural, cultural and historical resources found within the Parkers Creek Preserve.
IV. Land Stewardship
Learn what happened to the American chestnut tree and the importance of not introducing non-native plants to our environment. Be able to see and understand good examples of land management practices such as: o Trail stewardship o Forest management o Habitat protection o Wildlife management o Cultural restoration o Sustainable agricultural practices. Understand how climate change might affect our habitats in the short and long term. Understand that ACLT is allowing the Parkers Creek Preserve to return to an “old growth” forest that surrounds and protects a biologically diverse estuary which functions as a small scale model, or microcosm, of the larger Chesapeake Bay estuary.
Interpretive Theme: Parkers Creek Preserve helps visitors understand how a small grassroots conservation organization can make important land preservation contributions that benefit the Chesapeake Bay Estuary and all our members and visitors alike.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 35
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Market Analysis The market analysis and marketing recommendations are an important part of this interpretive planning document. Note that no new visitor surveys were conducted and the current market analysis and visitor numbers were taken from existing ACLT information. The facilities portion of the ACLT master plan document addressed some of these issues. From these in-house documents some visitation information is available as the graphs below indicate. A separate, more detailed marketing strategy document will be created in the future.
*Roadside directional signs posted by the State Highway Administration in September 2007 caused a notable bump in visitation.
It is noted that in the past five years, due to increased efforts by ACLT to enhance the visibility of its site, there has been a 90% growth in hiker visitation.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 36
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
From our focus workshop and board meeting on June 26, 2010, the development of a marketing strategy depends on a number of variables. The first of which is “What kind of audiences is ACLT likely to attract and what are the best ways to attract the kind of audiences ACLT wants”. This question is addressed in the Target User Group Marketing Section below. The second main question that the ACLT board has to address is “What level of public access does ACLT want – how many new visitors does ACLT want, and what would be required in terms of services (parking, etc.) to accommodate”? This question is generally answered in the Next Marketing Steps Section below. From the meeting: Visitation to ACLT-owned and managed properties by hikers, volunteers, event and program attendees, hunters, and researchers averaged 6,500 per year for 2009 and 2010. Separating out the approximately 500 annual visitors to the Warrior’s Rest Sanctuary (a limited access area), total visitation to ACLT’s two main points of entry (the North and South Trailheads) averaged over an entire year total, currently equates to about 8 cars per day. Just using the hiker and hunter visitation and omitting events and programs, equates to about 5-6 cars per day. The largest single day visitation at each of these locations in 2010 was 82 at the North Trailhead (41 cars); 20 (10 cars) at the South Trailheads; and 50 (25 cars) at Warrior’s Rest Sanctuary. In terms of single day visitation, some of the larger events are already at the capacity of ACLT’s three points of entry based on present roads, parking areas, access limits, and other infrastructure capacity considerations. The facilities plan contemplates that ACLT’s two larger events (annual membership meeting and auction/dinner) continue to be held off-site, as is presently the case. These off-site events are not included in the above visitation numbers. Within the ACLT board there were a range of answers given to the question “What number of cars (visitors) would each of us ideally like to see at our two trailheads on a daily basis?” Answers ranged from 3 (below current levels) to 50 cars (about 100 visitors) per day. Questions for further research regarding increasing visitation by that number would include: Will increased public access to ACLT’s sites affect the ACLT neighbors in a negative way? Will/could increased visitation negatively impact the natural and cultural resources? If so, how? Will the existing parking areas be able to handle the increased numbers/day, or higher numbers to the parking areas on weekends? Will increased visitation mean an increase in paid membership – will membership numbers rise due to increased marketing and on-site services?
Target User Group Marketing As the board considers future marketing strategies, the work done by ACLT indicates a diversity of macro and micro market groups including:
Visitors/users for Natural Resource Studies and Research Visitors/users for Cultural Resource Studies and Research
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 37
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Recreational use (hikers, canoe trip participants, mountain bikers, etc.) Educational Users and Summer Programs Events and Group Activities (Earth Day Auction, other special events). Resource Management Programs (hiking trail maintenance, cultural restoration, invasive plant control, deer herd management, etc.)
Undesirable Users Collectors Beach parties/campfires ATV users With a review of these user groups, the most likely target markets for marketing focus and membership increases would be: Day users/recreation use – probably the majority of current ACLT members Local residents – most likely to become members if not already Special events and programs (if fees for participation are charged, non-member’s fee could include or go towards a “one year” trial membership Other regional residents, probably families (depending on children’s program development) and retired residents who enjoy hiking and natural/cultural history experiences. Each of these diverse market groups would require a different marketing strategy – with the main marketing goals being to: 1) increase public awareness of the Parkers Creek Preserve; 2) encourage public access (visitation) to the Preserve; and 3) to grow financial and volunteer support to maintain the Preserve by growing the ACLT membership and volunteer corps.
Marketing a New Brand? One new issue that could help increase visitation and membership growth is the “rebranding” of the ACLT sites, trails and resources. That re-branding would focus on the “name change” of the ACLT sites/trails to the Parkers Creek Preserve (PCP). The ACLT staff/board have spent the last several years re-branding ACLT (new logo, stationery, trail guides, entrance sign at Double Oak). The board does not want to lose ground on public recognition of the organization’s identity and the importance of generating support for the organization and its mission. The distinction needs to be continually made that PCP is the place. ACLT is the organization that cares for that “place”.
What’s in a Name? I would assume that many potential new market groups do not know what the American Chestnut Land Trust is? From the road signs (which read, “Chestnut Land Trust Trails”) it is not clear whether it is a thing (organization) or a place (trails, interpretive services, programs). While the ACLT name might generate some confusion as to just what ACLT is, the term Nature Preserve, or Preserve, is quite clear. You are a place rather than a “thing”.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 38
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve With this in mind, re-branding the ACLT sites and organization as: American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parkers Creek Preserve
The naming modification as noted above could potentially play a very important marketing role. Being part of or a member of an organization that manages a “preserve” is more positive and clear to potential “resource preservation minded market groups”. This would be especially important to marketing to the target markets noted on the previous page.
The Next Marketing Steps To move the marketing goals forward, beyond the scope of the current interpretive plan, a separate marketing strategy is recommended to address next steps for ACLT, such as: Develop new marketing strategies for different target market groups Develop a “marketing tracking program” to monitor the effects of the marketing program against the stated marketing goals(e.g .increased site/trail use, attendance at special events, membership increases by market group). Review annually to assess the carrying capacity of the facilities and to assess progress toward marketing goals for a five-year period. This strategy will help the ACLT staff monitor for slow and careful growth (not growing too fast to exceed the carrying capacity of parking, trails, etc.) When the Board agrees upon the above recommendations, then a formal marketing plan can be developed, with design and distribution of new marketing materials via mail, web site marketing and other avenues, as funding and staff resources allow.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 39
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Review of Near-by Interpretive Sites and the ACLT “niche”. A number of near-by interpretive sites were visited and, in fact, JVA did the interpretive master plans for many of them. The following is a general review of the main focus of each of these organizations which will help put Parkers Creek in perspective within the region.
Calvert County – Cypress Swamp Nature Center The main focus for interpretation at Cypress Swamp is two-fold. 1. The Interpretation of the Cypress Swamp habitat and ecosystem. 2. The Interpretation of the old farming (tobacco) that occurred in what is now the Nature Center property. Their main visitor focus is on K-12 school groups for scheduled environmental education programs. A secondary visitation is in general families visiting the Nature Center with their children or grandchildren. A third market group is “empty nesters” who come to walk the short trails here.
Calvert County – Flag Ponds The main focus of interpretation here is on two main topics: 1. The historical development and use of the “ponds” for fishing. 2. Interpretation of the geology that allows visitors to find fossil shark teeth at the Chesapeake Bay beach access. Their main visitor group in the spring is school children coming for formal EE programs. During the summer the main market group was families coming with their beach supplies (coolers, chairs, etc.) to spend the day at the beach access. Not many visitors were engaged in walking trails.
Calvert County – Kings Landing Once an active farm and later a YMCA camp, the property was acquired by Maryland Department of Natural Resources and is now managed by Calvert County. Kayakers, canoeists, and fishermen enjoy Kings Landing's relaxing access to the river, nearby creeks, and marshes which are the main market groups. The site also is used by visitors for swimming and picnicking. There is not a major interpretive thrust at Kings Landing. Some interpretation focuses on the farming and later development of the YMCA camp.
Calvert Cliffs State Park Calvert Cliffs State Park is a day-use park featuring a sandy beach, unique fossils, recycled tire playground, a freshwater and tidal marshland and 13 miles of hiking trails located in Calvert County. Along with the interesting cliffs, the park offers nature trails, picnic areas, playground equipment, fishing, historic interest, hunting, youth group camping, shelters and many interpretative programs. Designated as a wildlands area, 1079 acres of the park are preserved for hiking and nature appreciation. Thirteen miles of marked foot trails are open to the public. Bicycles and Equestrian riders are restricted to the service road. Biking is prohibited on designated wildlands trails.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 40
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
The main focus of interpretation here is on the cliffs that reveal the remains of prehistoric species including sharks, whales, rays, and seabirds that were the size of small airplanes. Guided interpretive programs are available seasonally, with a variety of selfguiding interpretation also available.
Jefferson Patterson Park The visitors' center, formerly a barn for showing cattle, has been converted to a museum of colonial artifacts and ice age fossils. It also serves as a classroom for teacher training workshops, hands-on archaeology, public lectures, school groups, and Boy Scouts seeking to earn their archaeology badge. Future educational program are being designed to provide undergraduate and graduate students experience in archaeological collections management, laboratory analysis, and interpretation. The Park has a modest but growing visitation with added special events including their annual “festival”. Their main interpretive focus includes: Archaeology Maryland History Colonial and Native American Life War of 1812 Hiking trails have been expanded and the museum or scheduled programs are the main visitor draw.
The ACLT “niche”. All of the above sites do share a common history of the farming land use from Colonial times up to the early 1900’s. This story is interpreted at Cypress Swamp Nature Center in some detail, but there are future plans for a much more substantial agricultural heritage interpretive site on the Biscoe Gray farm owned by Calvert County. The real focus at Cypress Swamp is on “nature center” topics focused on environmental education. The ACLT niche seems to be both clear and strong and includes: The focus offering of a diversity of hiking trails through a variety of habitats A member driven organization focused on preservation Focus on the stewardship and preservation of these landscapes and ecosystems Focus on the restoration and resource management of these landscapes Interpretation and preservation of the Parkers Creek Watershed The only “private” organization to develop a large successful land trust in the region The ecological ties between this site and the Chesapeake Bay watershed Interpretation of the historic cultural story that is site specific and how that land use affected the landscape we see today. While the farming heritage is common for all other sites, the remaining subject areas are unique to Parkers Creek and the ACLT operations in comparison to the other organizations.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 41
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
ACLT Interpretive Site Resource Inventory Key: O – Orientation sites. H – Historic Sites T – Interpretive Trails B- Biological Site V- Vista or viewpoints. P – Proposed new facilities (such as trailhead kiosks). North Side: PO-1 PO-2 PO-3 PO-4 PH-1 PB-1 T-1 PV-1 PV-2
New Site Entrance sign (Parkers Creek Nature Preserve and ACLT Office). Interpretive Pavilion and Trail Head Central Information Point. Parking Area/Trail Head Sign (and Staff Parking Sign). Prince Frederick Town Center New Trail Head Kiosk/Central Information Point Agricultural Heritage (Garden) Interpretive Panel. Meadow Interpretive Viewing Area. Turkey Trail and Spur Self-guiding trail. Parkers Creek Vista Viewpoint Platform from Turkey Trail Spur. Proposed Overlook Viewing Deck From Horse Bay Overlook Trail.
South Side: PO-5 PT-2 PT-3 H-2 H-3 H-4 H-5 B-2 B-3
New Interpretive Pavilion and Trail Head Central Information Point. Cultural History Trail Self-Guiding Loop. Natural History/Land Management Self-Guiding Loop. Howard White Barn and related Homestead Interpretive Area. Hance-Chesley Cemetery Interpretation Warriors Rest Historic Area. Wallace Farm and corn crib. Invasive Species Management Demonstration Area. Beaver Dam
Interpretive Opportunities – Inventory and Analysis The review and compilation of interpretive opportunities for each ACLT interpretive site included in the Interpretive Plan followed a planning process developed over many years of conducting this type of planning process. The sites included in the interpretive plan inventory were selected by the consultant and ACLT staff based on each site’s ability to accomplish one or more of the following. 1. 2. 3. 4.
Illustrate the ACLT legacy and mission. Provide visitors with first class natural and cultural resource experiences. Demonstrate preservation and stewardship issues and management practices. Provide public access to trail and related resources.
A standard Preserve Inventory and Interpretive Resources Analysis form was used to record the various interpretive opportunities, existing interpretive media,
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 42
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
recommendations and other data. One form set was completed for each site and are provided on the following pages. The process used for the interpretive analysis and assessment of interpretive opportunities was obtained from and compiled from a variety of sources including: Visits to each individual site – trail walking and review of cultural and natural features of each as time permitted. Interviews with preserve staff members. Review of numerous ACLT previous planning documents and visitor assessment documents Review of interpretive information for each site from information on the ACLT web site page. Participation in ACLT board and committee meetings and discussions. Conducting an Interpretive Planning Focus Workshop.
Interpretive Media Mix and Opportunities – total site interpretation options. The interpretive planning form sets provided on the following pages reflect or recommend interpretive services or media for that individual site. For most trails, for example, the interpretive media recommendations would generally include new trail head signs or an interpretive kiosk. But for the total interpretation media mix for ACLT, the following interpretive media are recommended.
Live Interpretive Guided Walks Interpretive guided walks organized/led by ACLT volunteers or other staff members can be conducted on all of the trails within the ACLT system. Interpretive programs and theme topics can vary greatly, based on providing a good variety of led interpretive walks. Some of the guided walk topics could include: Seasonal wildflowers Seasonal bird migration Overview of ecology of the area the trail takes walkers through. Management of diverse habitats. Historic land use and habitat restoration. Impact of invasive plants on the ecosystem. Historical use of Parkers Creek. Farming and early settlement of the region. Wildlife watching and interpretation. Insects and their importance in diverse ecosystems. Guided walks should be managed by a volunteer coordinator to ensure a good range of diversity of program topics. Part of the volunteer/guide training would include how to give a guided walk. A general outline for planning and delivery of guided interpretive walks is provided below. Pre-Tour - Arrive early to walk the tour route. - Walk trail to confirm stops for illustrating your theme. - Check for best locations given group size. - Check to make sure you have any of your handouts with you. - Review your welcome and introduction. - Meet and welcome participants as they arrive.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 43
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve - Bathroom visit before tour starts? - See if they are dressed appropriately for the walk/weather, etc. Introductions - Introduce yourself. - Have visitors introduce themselves (if small enough group). - Introduce the Theme of the walk with provokes. - Cover safety or logistic issues (rules). - Ask for any questions. - Provocative statement for the first stop. Body of the Presentation
- Position visitors for each stop so that everyone can see the focus of the stop, and hear you. - Use Tilden’s TIPS for interpreting each stop. Be sure to link the stop to the tour theme. - While you are walking, if one visitor asks you a question, restate the question so all can hear it – then answer it. - At the end of one stop (reveal) – provoke for the next stop. - Watch visitors for their comfort and interest. - Watch your walking pace – keep everyone together. - Wait until everyone has caught up before you start your presentation. - Be sure each stop illustrates your theme – restate your theme, but in different ways. - Have fun opening up eyes and minds and possibilities. Your conclusion - Do a quick review of the things they saw, learned about or experienced. - Restate the theme your program illustrated. - Do a simple evaluation of the program, asking the visitors questions about what they experiences, etc. (keep it simple). - In form them of other upcoming events and opportunities. - Have any handout information or program schedules available for them (websites, volunteer opportunities, etc.). - Offer to wait a bit if anyone has any other questions they would like to talk about. - Bid them a safe journey home and hope to see them again soon.
It should be noted that “live interpretive walks and tours” are the most effective interpretive program or service offerings. They help build organization memberships, impart stewardship messages, and build positive impressions of the managing organization. It is the most cost effective of all interpretive media in returning benefits back to the organization.
Cell Phone Interpretation Constantly changing and improving technology allows for innovative interpretation that could cover the total ACLT site – depending on current and future cell phone coverage. Cell phone interpretation can be used for: Interpretation of seasonal natural history topics (seasonal birds, wildflowers, special sightings, etc.). Interpretation of resource management activities (removing invasive species). Interpretation of individual historic sites – can add information and photos of historic barns, homesteads, cemeteries, and related cultural assets. Provide up dated trail access information (trail walking times, trail maintenance issues such as a flooded trail section, and related topics). Information about administrative issues – board meetings, membership information, volunteer opportunities.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 44
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Web Site Expanded Use. As part of the total marketing and interpretation effort, the ACLT web site becomes the main contact point for new and returning visitors. The web in addition to its current content the ACLT web site could: Have PDF’s for all trail interpretive guides (including seasonal trail guides and guides in other languages such as Spanish). Have a pod cast station for smart phone users to download short interpretive programs – from trail interpretation to other interpretive services, events, programs or activities. Have video programs with virtual trail guides, and video programs on seasonal plants and wildlife topics. Have a web based “web-cam” on different views – from bird nests to general views of Parkers Creek.
Individual Site Inventory and Story Development Form Sets. Appendix 1 includes the entire group of form sets representing interpretive recommendations for each individual interpretive site. In many cases, a wide range of interpretive options are offered, from simple to more expensive. These options are given for the ACLT to consider, perhaps starting with less expensive and invasive media and allowing for future development of more expensive media options. These planning form sets are suggestions and recommendations and not set in stone. They are designed to be updated over time as needed, with new objectives or media options being able to be edited in or out.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 45
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Chapter 4: Phasing and Costs of Structures and Interpretation For the American Chestnut Land Trust, the critical decision that must be made next is to determine the specific feasibility of expanding upon the existing foundation at Double Oak. This facility plan recommends that to the extent practicable, the existing structure be reconfigured to accommodate as many facility needs as possible including: - converting the existing meeting room to a combination indoor-outdoor meeting space that would provide for expanded facilities at least on a seasonal basis - improve the energy efficiency of the existing building through weatherization and at the same time improve its appearance - consider improvements to additional outdoor spaces for interpretation (trail head/kiosk) support facilities (restrooms and covered space for volunteers)
Implementation Phasing and Cost Estimate Matrix for Structures For the purposes of the master plan and comparing the options from one side to the other, the following conceptual statement of probable costs is based on the diagrams presented. Please note that this is no guarantee that the facilities can be built for these costs in future years, but represent our professional judgment as to the approximate budget that should be targeted for each structure Phase 1) 2)A
3)A
Description Study the Feasibility of Expanding Double Oak IF EXISTING EXPANSION IS FEASIBLE Expansion of Double Oak (Scenario A) modify meeting room, add covered porch and deck; renovate the interior of meeting room, new bathroom, new siding and roof; new siding and porch
3)
Consider future expansion to include additional needed office space, and reconfiguration of interior spaces to increase efficiency IF EXPANSION IS NOT FEASIBLE Weatherization and appearance improvements only Outdoor kiosk/trailhead with composting toilet
4A)
Barn North Side – agricultural use only
2) B
Probable Cost $5,000-$10,000 Budget $150,000 (plus any structural modifications that may result from Phase 1) study. Allow for $300/sf including finish costs Budget $50,000 Large capacity systems for public facility use can cost as much as $20,000 or more. 2 TBD –
2
See EPA fact sheet on composting toilets at http://www.epa.gov/owm/mtb/comp.pdf Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 46
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
4 B)
1)
Barn North Side –joint agricultural and ACLT event use - designed to accommodate small events up to 75 people with controlled area for agricultura South Side Barn TRAILS AND BOARDWALK Introductory trail – ADA Accessible
2)
Viewing Blind with Interpretation
3)
Boardwalks with helical pier (screw pile) foundation
4)
Prefabricated Bridge over Parkers Creek
5)
dependent upon size and volunteer effort – allow $50/sf for materials (confirm with Jeff Klapper) (see above)
(see above) Chip seal or Polypave – allow $2.50/sf Allow $25/sf for structure – interpretive panels – see Veverka report Deck – $25/sf Piles – 85/lf Typical costs may be as high as $100,000 – a bridge study should be conducted to determine structural requirements
Implementation Phasing and Cost Estimate Matrix for Interpretation The Implementation Phasing and Cost Estimate Matrix is a summary of all the interpretive media and service recommendations for each individual preserve. The matrix provides: A list of individual interpretive services and media recommendations that were taken from individual Preserve Inventory and Analysis Forms, as well as recommendations that apply to all sites of the ACLT. Recommends a fiscal year implementation for the listed interpretive media and services. Provides a cost estimate, when possible, for implementation, design or construction/fabrication for the recommended interpretive media or services. Note that this matrix is designed to serve as a guide and planning tool. Based in annual budgets and ACLT development priorities, this matrix is designed to be flexible. Thus, the fiscal year recommended for implementation can be changed as needed.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 47
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Cost estimates are based on 2010/2011 costs for design/fabrication for interpretive services or media. It is suggested that items recommended for each fiscal year be reviewed to see if any changes in implementation priorities or costs have occurred. Cost estimate from Hopewell Manufacturing for kiosk with panels was $6000.00 four 3x4’ panels for the kiosk and two 2’x3’ panels for the overlook platform plus the kiosk kit. Additional costs could include brochure distribution racks that can attach to the kiosks.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
48
Implementation and Priorities Matrix
Index # O-1
O-2
Media/Services New ACLT North Site Entrance Sign Modification ACLT office and Parking. North Trail Head Parking Area.
X
Cost Estimate $1000.00 $300.00 $300.00
X X
Trail Head Central Information Point.
Estimate five 3’ x 4’ interpretive panels.(photo ready)
O-3
Parking Area/Trail Head Sign (and Staff Parking Sign).
O-4
Prince Frederick Town Center New Trail Head Kiosk/ Central Information Point. 3 sided Hopewell kiosk. 3’ x 4’ interpretive panel inserts.
H-1
Agricultural Heritage (Garden) Interpretive Panel. 2’ x 3’
B-1
Meadow Interpretive Viewing Area. Meadow observation deck ( 100 sq. ft.) Meadow interpretive panel, 2’ x 3’ final number to be determined. Observation scope.
11 12 13 14 15
X
$800.00 each
X
$2000.00
X X
$2000.00 $800.00 each X
$1000.00
$4000.00 Year Five $1500.00 each $1200.00
48
49
Index #
Implementation and Priorities Matrix Media/Services
11 12 13 14 15
Cost Estimate
T-1 & V-1
Turkey Trail and Spur Self-guiding trail with viewing deck. Interpretive panels (number to be determined photo ready).
Year Five $1500.00 each
V-2
Proposed Overlook Viewing Deck From Horse Bay Overlook Trail X Interpretive Panels for viewing deck (number TBD). X
TBD $800.00 each
O-5
Trail Head Central Information Point, South Side. Five vertical interpretive panels (3’ x 4’) photo ready
T-2
Cultural History Trail Self-Guiding Loop Approximately seven 1’ x 2’ interpretive panels located at key locations along the trail (sites to be selected at a later date). As an alternative, create interpretive messages printed on sand bags to be placed at the same locations. A third alternative would be to develop a self-guiding trail guide, available to be printed out at the ACLT web site photo ready.
X
$800.00 each
X
$500.00 each $400.00 each
X
$4000.00
49
50
Implementation and Priorities Matrix
Index # T-3
H-2
Media/Services Natural History/Land Management Self-guiding Loop Trail Self guiding printed trail guide (photo ready copy) Interpretive panels at key locations. (number TBD) Interpretive panels at resource Management project sites. (number TBD – vinyl) Trail guides/information available at the ACLT web site as PDF’s. Video interpretation of resource management programs /interpretation posted at the ACLT web site.
Cost Estimate
X X
$4000.00 $500.00 each
X
$800.00 each
X
TBD $1500.00/video Year Five
Howard White Barn and related Homestead Interpretive Area.
11 12 13 14 15
Being a key stop on the self-guiding heritage trail (proposed T-2 trail). Using one 2’ x 3’ interpretive panel at the home site. Continue using the interpretation of the home sites at the South Trail Head barn (panels on the exterior wall of porch) Interpretation with more historic photos if available on the ACLT web site. Possible use of cell phone interpretation.
X
NA $3000.00 No costs.
X
$500.00
50
51
Index #
Implementation and Priorities Matrix Media/Services
H-3
Hance-Chesley Cemetery (One 2’ x 3’ interpretive panel)
H-4
Warriors Rest Historic Area entrance sign. Interpretive media for this location will include live programs.
H-5
B-2
B-3
11 12 13 14 15 X
Beaver Dam A stop on a guided trail walk. A page in the ACLT web site. A web-cam on the beaver lodge (seasonal). Cell phone interpretation (as part of a total ACLT cell phone interpretation program).
$3000.00
TBD
Wallace Farm and corn crib. Being a key stop on the self-guiding heritage trail (proposed T-2 trail). X Using one 2’ x 3’ interpretive panel at the home site. Interpretation of the cultural history of ACLT in the visitor orientation pavilions at both key visitor contact areas. Continue using the interpretation of the home sites at the South Trail Head barn (panels on the exterior wall of porch Interpretation with more historic photos if available on the ACLT web site. Possible use of cell phone interpretation. XXX Invasive Species Management Demonstration Area. One or two 2’ x 3’ interpretive panels (final number TBD).
Cost Estimate
X
No cost $800.00
X
$800.00/panel No cost.
X
X
TBD see page 71
$900.00 each
X X X X
No Cost TBD $4000.00 see page 71 51
52
Other related cost estimates: Cell phone interpretation estimates: Script development for each cell phone interpretation (est.10 stations): $1600.00 Sound studio time for recording cell phone narrations and related sound effects: $1500.00 Digital answering machine for up to 20 extensions: costs vary depending on brand – est. $800.00 Phone line costs: based on your phone company. Interpretive Panels (2’ x 3’) average costs. -
Research, interpretive text development, mock-up design: $800/panel. Production ready design (costs vary depending on panel complexity): $500-$1000.00 Panel fabrication (from production ready design): $800.00 Frame/mounting system (if not included in panel fabrication cost): $300.00 + (depending on supplier) Shipping to your location: Cost will vary – est. $300.00.
Total estimated cost given the above variables: Est.: $2600.00 - $3000.00 each if research, design is contracted out). Total estimate cost for 3’ x 4’ panels for kiosk inserts: $800.00 each if production ready. Hopewell 3-sided kiosk with roof assembly (wood for roof not included): (1) 36"w x 48" h Kiosk Kit, HPL panels, WITH design and shipping to 20648 = $4674.00 (1) 36"w x 48" h Kiosk Kit, HPL panels, NO design and shipping to 20648 = $4121.00
52
Page 53
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Potential Funding Sources Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network Current emphasis on public access to the water – 50/50 match required. www.baygateways.net
The Recreational Trails Program (RTP) This program funds the development of community-based, motorized and non-motorized recreational trail projects. The program provides funds for all kinds of recreational trail uses, such as pedestrian uses (hiking, running, wheelchair use), bicycling, in-line skating, equestrian use, cross-country skiing, off-road motorcycling, all-terrain vehicle riding, four-wheel driving. Contract Maryland State Highway Administration http://www.sha.state.md.us/Index.aspx?PageId=98 Grants are typically due in July and have an 80-20 matching requirement. Activities eligible for funding within this program include: maintenance and restoration of existing recreational trail development and rehabilitation of trailside facilities and trail linkages purchase and lease of trail construction equipment construction of new trails acquisition of easements or property for recreational trails or recreational trail corridors implementation of interpretive/educational programs to promote intrinsic qualities, safety, and environmental protection, as those objectives relate to the use of recreational trails
The Transportation Enhancement Program (TEP) As part of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Surface Transportation Program (STP), the Transportation Enhancement Program (TEP) is a reimbursable, federal aid funding program for transportation-related community projects designed to strengthen the intermodal transportation system. The TEP supports communities in developing projects that improve the quality of life for their citizens and enhance the travel experience for people traveling by all modes. It fosters more choices for travel by providing funding for projects that enhance the cultural, aesthetic, historic, and environmental aspects of the intermodal transportation system. The program can assist in funding projects that create bicycle facilities, restore historic buildings, preserve abandoned railway corridors for pedestrian trails, mitigate highway runoff, acquire scenic viewsheds, create transportation museums, preserve scenic or historic highways, and other transportation related enhancements. In Maryland TEP is administered by the Maryland State Highway Administration. Transportation Enhancement grants typically require a 50-50 match, and in the past have been focused on construction ready projects. Maryland SHA is accepting applications from January 2 to the end of March, 2011. See http://www.roads.maryland.gov/Index.aspx?PageId=144 for guidelines.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
Page 54
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Maryland Historical Trust and Maryland Heritage Areas Authority The Parkers Creek Preserve is within the Southern Maryland Heritage Area and ACLT should continue to pursue small grants either as part of a match for larger projects or to support preservation and interpretation of the cultural sites within ACLT’s managed properties. Grants are typically due in February/March. See: http://mht.maryland.gov/grants.html http://mht.maryland.gov/grants_heritagearea_project.html http://mht.maryland.gov/heritageareas_southernmd.html
Miles Fund Grants Lester Miles was a long time member of The Mountain Club of Maryland. He served as Treasurer, Membership Chairman and hike leader along with other volunteer leadership duties for the Club. Dividends and interest from portions of his estate bequeathed to the Mountain Club of Maryland are being used to award grants to non profit organizations for projects in keeping with the with the founding goals of the Mountain Club of Maryland. They were not to be used for operating expenses of MCM or organizations requesting grants. Provide its members and guests the opportunity to enjoy and become educated about nature through hiking. Build and maintain trails and shelters for public use. Aid in the conservation of wild lands and wildlife, and to protect places of natural beauty, particularly in the areas accessible to Baltimore. Grants should be requested by obtaining the “Miles Fund Proposal” form from the Miles Fund Administrator at
[email protected] or by mail at 802 Kingston Road, Baltimore, MD 21212.
The TKF Foundation The TKF Foundation is a private grant-making foundation whose purpose is to inspire and create "Open Spaces, Sacred Places". TKF Announces New National Grant Awards Program. Beginning in 2012, TKF will begin awarding challenge grants of up to $1 million to applicants who seek to create a new Open Space Sacred Place and to study aspects of the impact on the human spirit of the opportunity to be in nature. Open to qualified applicants from across the United States, this program is designed to inspire non-profit organizations, professional associations, educational institutions, municipalities and community-based groups from a range of perspectives to come together in interdisciplinary teams to create new public green spaces and to implement a significant research or evaluation component. This opportunity would be worth following at: http://www.tkffdn.org/grant/faqs.php
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
Appendix 1: Interpretive Site Inventory North Side: PO-1 New Site Entrance Sign (Parkers Creek Nature Preserve and ACLT Office) PO-2 Trail Head Central Information Point PO-3 Parking Area/Trail Head Sign (and Staff Parking Sign) PO-4 Prince Frederick Town Center New Trail Head Kiosk PH-1 Agricultural Heritage (Garden) Interpretive Panel PB-1 Meadow Interpretive Viewing Area PTV-1 Turkey Trail and Spur Self-guiding Trail V-2 Proposed Overlook Viewing Deck from Horse Bay Overlook Trail
A-1 A-3 A-6 A-7 A-9 A-11 A-14 A-17
South Side: PO-5 T-2 T-3 H-2 H-3 H-4 H-5 B-2 B-3
South Side Trail Head Central Information Point History Introduction Self-Guiding Loop Natural History Self-Guiding Loop Howard White Barn and related Homestead Interpretive Area Hance-Chesley Cemetery Interpretation Warrior’s Rest Historic Area Wallace Farm and corn crib Invasive Species Management Demonstration Area Beaver Dam
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
A-19 A-22 A-25 A-28 A-31 A-35 A-37 A-40 A-42
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
This page intentionally left blank.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐1
American Chestnut Land Trust Parkers Creek Interpretive Master Plan
Interpretive Site Inventory and Story Development Form Site Index Number: PO-1 Site Name: New Site Entrance sign (Parkers Creek Nature Preserve and ACLT Office).
Site Location: Entrance to the ACLT office and trail head area (see photo below). Main interpretive topic(s): Visitor orientation way finding signage.
Management issues to be addressed if any: Providing upgraded way finding signage to the ACLT office and trail head area.
Interpretive Objectives for this site: -
Provide a reinforcement of the new marketing name. Have an enhanced “sense of arrival” for first time visitors. Provide reinforcement that this is the site for the trail head and office.
Recommended Interpretive Media Options: It is suggested that the main entrance sign (photo) be upgraded with a new entrance sign. The new entrance sign should have the new name presented (Parkers Creek Preserve and ACLT Office). Other information should be presented that is on the current sign: -
Welcome to…. Office hours of operation. Site/trail open hours. Trail head parking and sign in.
As the current entrance sign is relatively new, the ACLT staff recommends adding a piece across the top saying “Welcome to Parkers Creek Preserve”, leaving the rest in place. Remaining content for the sign is satisfactory.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐2
Follow up way finding signage would include: - ACLT office and Parking. - North Trail Head Parking Area.
Site Photo(s):
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐3
American Chestnut Land Trust Parkers Creek Interpretive Master Plan
Interpretive Site Inventory and Story Development Form Site Index Number: PO-2 Site Name: North Side Trailhead Central Information Point.
Site Location: Final location for the Central information Point would be located at the trailhead. This may include a new structure (barn porch or a separate covered trailhead structure) to be determined. A draft barn design is provided below. Main interpretive topic(s): Topics for interpretation in the orientation pavilion could include: - Trail map and introduction to the site.. - Information interpretive panel on Parkers Creek Preserve and ACLT. - Watchable wildlife area/viewing from the proposed pavilion. - Upcoming and events schedules (changeable bulletin board). - Interpretation about the garden project. - Orientation for the South Side Trails and interpretive experiences. - ACLT contact information. Management issues to be addressed if any: -
Visitor safety for trail use (trail use daylight hours only – check for ticks). Trail stewardship issues (pick up litter, not picking wildflowers, note trail maintenance issues on the sign-in-sheet). Note interpretive opportunities at other trails. Membership marketing (how to get involved, membership, support, volunteer opportunities, etc.).
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐4
Interpretive Objectives for this site: During or upon completion of their visit to the trailhead central information point, the majority of visitors will: -
Understand the ownership and management of the Parkers Creek Preserve. Understand the recreational use options and the trail rules. Understand the “leave no trace” motto in using the trails. Use the trails in a safe and stewardship like manner. Learn about upcoming ACLT events. Be motivated to become an ACLT member if not one already. Tell others about the ACLT/Parkers Creek interpretive offerings and opportunities. Learn about volunteer opportunities and consider volunteering for the ACLT. Feel grateful that the ACLT and its partners have worked to protect Parkers Creek and other regional landscapes and habitats.
Recommended General Interpretive Media Options: Recommended media for the North Side Trail Head: -
-
One 3’ x 4’ trail entrance sign. The trail entrance sign would include a trail system map with walking times, and information related to the above objectives. Have guided interpretive walks offered by staff or volunteers that can reflect a variety of topics as noted in the above objectives. Have self-guiding brochures (can be seasonal) available as PDF’s from the ACLT web site. Have cell phone interpretation for the North Side Trail Head that could include: o Trail safety updates (flooding, erosion areas, ticks) o Seasonal trail features (wildflower blooms, bird sightings, etc.). o Guided walk schedules (direct to the web site). o Interpretation about specific trail stops (to be determined). Wildlife viewing blinds or platforms (to be designed – location to be determined).
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐5
Site Photo(s):
North Side Trail Head location – yellow circle.
A draft design for the proposed barn is provided above. It is suggested that exterior interpretive panels be located on the porch areas that would address the main objectives. This might include three or four 3’ x 4’ interpretive panels. Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐6
American Chestnut Land Trust Parkers Creek Interpretive Master Plan
Interpretive Site Inventory and Story Development Form Site Index Number: PO-3 Site Name: Parking Area/Trail Head Sign (and Staff Parking Sign). Site Location: By the ACLT office (final placement TBD). Main interpretive topic(s): Visitor way finding/orientation.
Management issues to be addressed if any: -
For new visitors, directing them to either the ACLT office, or to the North Trail Head. Note to visitors for “staff parking” by the ACLT office, with a sign for “visitor parking”. Separate sign for “North Trail Parking Area”.
Interpretive Objectives for this site: -
Visitor on site orientation providing a final sense of arrival for new visitors.
Recommended Interpretive Media Options: Orientation signs for: -
Staff Parking ACLT Office Parking North Trail Head Parking (directional arrow) sign by ACLT office. North Trail Head Parking.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐7
American Chestnut Land Trust Parkers Creek Interpretive Master Plan
Interpretive Site Inventory and Story Development Form Site Index Number: PO-4 Site Name: Prince Frederick Town Center New Trail Head Kiosk/Central Information Point Site Location: Prince Frederick Town Center New Trail Head (see photo and site location map). Main interpretive topic(s): Topics for the trail head kiosk: - One interpretive panel on the trail names, trail location map and distance/walking times. - Interpretation Panel the ACLT mission, and other trail head locations and trail types (walking times, viewing areas, ACLT contact information, etc.). - The link between Main Street and the Chesapeake Bay. - How we all have impacted the Bay in some way, and how those impacts have affected the cultural history and natural history of the area. - Learn what is being done to help restore and protect Chesapeake Bay’s natural resources.
Management issues to be addressed: -
Provide visitor orientation to the trail systems accessed from this point with related safety information (walking times and distance, etc.).
-
Provide visitors with ACLT management information and membership marketing.
Interpretive Objectives for this site: The majority of the visitors will: -
Be made aware of habitat changes from the NS trailhead. Learn about the link between Main Street and the Chesapeake Bay. Understand how we all have impacted the Bay in some way, and how those impacts have affected the cultural history and natural history of the area. Learn what is being done to help restore and protect Chesapeake Bay’s natural resources. Learn about the ACLT trail routes, walking times and distances and related trail stewardship messages.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐8
-
All visitors will be encouraged to use the trail in a safe and stewardship-like manner. Non ACLT members will be encouraged to visit the ACLT web site and be motivated to visit/hike others trail. Be surprised to learn about the extent of ACLT preservation activities and successes. Be motivated to become an ACLT member.
Recommended Interpretive Media Options: Recommended interpretive media would be a three-panel interpretive orientation kiosk, with two 3’ x 4’ interpretive panel inserts and one changeable bulletin board. A sample design is provided below.
Other interpretive media options for use with this trail system: - Guided interpretive trail walks. - Cell phone interpretation - Pod casts about related trail topics and Chesapeake Bay history/information. - Web site PDF trail guides.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐9
American Chestnut Land Trust Parkers Creek Interpretive Master Plan
Interpretive Site Inventory and Story Development Form Site Index Number: PH-1 Site Name: Sustainable Agricultural Interpretive Panel. Site Location: Located in the North section of ACLT, east of the ACLT office and near the North trail heads. Main interpretive topic(s): A topic for interpretation would be an explanation of the Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) concept and benefits of locally grown food and sustainable agricultural practices utilized. Management issues to be addressed if any:’ -
Safety information (electrified fence). CSA Share marketing information. Volunteer opportunities to assist with the CSA program here.
Interpretive Objectives for this site: During or upon completion of their visit there, the majority of visitors will: -
Learn the purpose of the CSA garden demonstration area. Learn about any volunteer opportunities for managing the garden (in season). Learn about farm events and educational programs.
Recommended Interpretive Media Options: Interpretive media for this location could use one or two interpretive panels. The interpretive panels could follow the garden throughout the garden seasons, from planting to harvest. A sample design for wayside exhibit panels is provided below.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐10
The current ACLT/CSA garden area. The location of proposed interpretive panels can be determined in the future should the garden interpretive story and/or layout change.
Sample interpretive panel mountings for self standing panels. The panel may also be wallmounted on the proposed barn porch.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐11
American Chestnut Land Trust Parkers Creek Interpretive Master Plan
Interpretive Site Inventory and Story Development Form Site Index Number: PB-1 Site Name: Meadow Interpretive Viewing Area. Site Location: Located in the Northern section across from the garden area (H-1). Main interpretive topic(s): As a large amount of the ACLT landscape is in forest habitat, the meadow area allows for interpretation of meadow plants and animals (birds and insects) as well as interpreting edge effects with the forest, and succession areas that can be see here. Management issues to be addressed if any: Meadow management may require: - Prescribed burns as a management tool. - Removal of wood tree/shrub species. - Replanting with native meadow plant species. - Removal of invasive species. Interpretive Objectives for this site: During their meadow demonstration visit, the majority of visitors will: - Learn which seasonal species (birds, plants, insects) they can see for each season. - Learn how different animals utilize the meadow habitat (feeding, nesting, etc.) - Understand how meadow habitats differ from other ACLT habitats. - Learn how the demonstration meadow is managed for removal of succession woody plants. - Learn how invasive species can affect the meadow habitat. - Be motivated to walk a (proposed) meadow loop trail to look at meadow plants and residents close up.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐12
Recommended Interpretive Media Options:
This photo is of the proposed meadow demonstration area. The proposed location of the ACLT/Parkers Creek Preserve interpretive pavilion is illustrated in the yellow circle. A mowed loop walking trail can circle from the pavilion with a viewing deck with view scope. An interpretive panel can highlight the plant/wildlife species for the season (photo on the following page.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐13
Sample viewing deck and changeable interpretive panel for a meadow/prairie habitat.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐14
American Chestnut Land Trust Parkers Creek Interpretive Master Plan
Interpretive Site Inventory and Story Development Form Site Index Number: T-1 & PV-1 Site Name: Turkey Trail and Spur Self-guiding trail with viewing deck. Site Location: Reference North Site Trail Guide Map below.
Turkey Trail trailhead.
Proposed location for a Parkers Creek viewing deck with interpretive panels.
The view from the Turkey Spur Trail onto Parkers Creek where the viewing deck is recommended.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐15
Main interpretive topic(s): This trail is a well signed interpretive trail with a variety of topics/subjects presented. The panels are well done, but do not have a focused interpretive theme. Topics vary from panel to panel. Photos of a few panels are provided on following pages. This is to be the introductory trail for the North Side, and can be used to provide an overall introduction to the natural history of this area. Management issues to be addressed if any: This interpretive trail leads visitors to one of the best viewing areas for Parkers Creek, where a new viewing deck is proposed. Management issues might include wildlife viewing ethics, not approaching wildlife or scaring them and having a “quiet” experience watching wildlife. Interpretive Objectives for this site: During or upon completion of their trail walk, and trail visit the majority of visitors will: -
Gain a general understanding of the plants and animals of this habitat. Understand the importance of preserving this and related habitats by the ACLT. Learn about any trail stewardship/management issues for the trail Be referred to the interpretive pavilion for other more detailed interpretive messages about Parkers Creek and the viewing decks.
Recommended Interpretive Media Options: -
The existing interpretive panels located by and along the Turkey Trail are fine and should be left in place until they are ready for replacement. Note that the Turkey Trail provides a good introduction to the natural history of the area on the North Side Trail Head Sign. There is a proposed viewing deck being considered for this trail.
-
Add one new interpretive viewing deck. A sample photo of a viewing deck is provided. The one for the viewing area for Turkey Spur would only need to be about ½ of the size of the one illustrated in the photo. Design and final location are to be determined.
-
Interpretation on the viewing deck should focus on the wildlife that can be seen here. The interpretive panel can be a 2’ x 6’ panel that can show the difference in wildlife throughout the 4 seasons. This would be a good location for an interpretive guide to walk visitors to for a watchable wildlife program.
-
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐16
-
Depending on cell phone reception, this would be a good location for seasonal cell phone or pod casts on seasonal wildlife.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐17
American Chestnut Land Trust Parkers Creek Interpretive Master Plan
Interpretive Site Inventory and Story Development Form Site Index Number: V-2 Site Name: Proposed Overlook Viewing Deck From Bay Overlook Trail.
Site Location: Refer to the trail location map below for the recommended location for the proposed Bay Overlook Platform.
The location for the proposed viewing deck for this trail illustrated by the red star.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐18
Main interpretive topic(s): The suggested topics for interpretation could include: -
-
Interpretation of the Chesapeake Bay watershed and Parkers Creek’s contribution to that watershed (the importance of wetlands and forested slopes in removing nutrients and pollution before it enters the Bay, for example). The research value of having an undeveloped, relatively pristine watershed such as Parkers Creek Preserve in today’s ecological landscape. The life cycles of wildlife of Parkers Creek (as a brackish creek).
Management issues to be addressed if any: Any potential management issues for this interpretive opportunity might focus around the viewing platforms and the safety of visitor using them – not climbing around them, on them, etc. Construction of the viewing decks themselves for minimum environmental invasiveness. Interpretive Objectives for this site: During their visit to/use of the viewing decks, the majority of visitors will: -
Gain an understanding of the Chesapeake Bay watershed and Parkers Creek contribution to that watershed Appreciate the importance of Parkers Creek Preserve in today’s ecological landscape. Understand the life cycles of wildlife of Parkers Creek (as a brackish creek). Understand the influence of the tides on Parkers Creek.
Recommended Interpretive Media Options: Interpretive media for this location could include the construction of a viewing deck that could accommodate approximately 10 visitors at one time. The viewing deck could have two or three 2’x3’rail mounted interpretive panels, focusing on the above objectives.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐19
American Chestnut Land Trust Parkers Creek Interpretive Master Plan
Interpretive Site Inventory and Story Development Form Site Index Number: O-5 Site Name: South Side Trail Head Central Information Point. Site Location: Reference the South Site Trails location map.
This is the current visitor information point for the South Side Trails, with interpretive information posted on the walls of the reconstructed barn, currently used for storage and maintenance equipment. It is suggested that a visitor orientation area, on a smaller scale to the one recommended for the Northern section be constructed here (medium size picnic shelter with exhibits underneath. The interpretive information would be relocated to this new visitor contact point with the barn continuing its use for storage (and visitors could still sit on the porch
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐20
Main interpretive topic(s): Visitor orientation topics to include: -
-
In general, the South Side Interpretation could emphasize the cultural resources and stories that are clearly visible here – old homesteads, barns, old fields, cemetery old road beds, etc. Trail use and safety information. ACLT marketing information (memberships, volunteer opportunities). Seasonal natural history interpretation topics (to be determined by education staff).
Management issues to be addressed if any: -
Trail use and stewardship. Trail safety. ACLT membership marketing information. ACLT other interpretive trails and learning opportunities. Changeable bulletin board for upcoming programs and events.
Interpretive Objectives for this site: During or upon completion of their visitor contact area experience the majority of visitors will: -
Have gain basic trail safety and stewardship information. Be directed to the trail head for trail routes and walking times. Be able to pick up copies of the South Side Trail Maps and ACLT information brochure. Learn about seasonal wildlife observation and plants that can be seen. Have a location to record any specific wildlife or plant sightings.
Recommended Interpretive Media Options: -
Three or four 3’ x 4’ vertical interpretive panels. One changeable bulletin board. One enhanced visitor trailhead sign-in sheets for visitors to record both wildlife sightings and trail maintenance issues.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐21
Sample interpretive panel frame from Hopewell Manufacturing.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐22
American Chestnut Land Trust Parkers Creek Interpretive Master Plan
Interpretive Site Inventory and Story Development Form Site Index Number: T-2 Site Name: History Introductory Self-guiding loop trail. Site Location:
The proposed History Introductory self-guiding loop would use existing trails starting at the parking area to include sections of the Gravatt Lane and Bloodroot Trails, and the Wallace Lane segment.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐23
Main interpretive topic(s): Interpretation along this trail could focus on the early farming heritage of this area, including the farm field that the trail would loop around. Topics would also include interpretation of the Wallace Homestead and Farm, the home of an African American farmer who owned about one hundred acres from 1909 until the mid 1930’s. Management issues to be addressed if any: The main management issue here is to keep people from entering the home or causing any damage to it. Interpretive Objectives for this site: During their trail walking experience the majority of visitors will: - Learn how much of this area was farmed. - Gain a sense of what farming life would have been like living and working here in the early 1900’s. - Learn that the restoration work of the home by volunteers received a Calvert County historic preservation award in 2009. - Understand the forest succession story – this site doesn’t look anything like it did when you could see the bay from the South Side trailhead! - Learn what the crops were that were farmed here. - Gain a general overview of other historic buildings and cemetery in the area. Recommended Interpretive Media Options: Interpretive media for this trail could include: -
One 2’ x 3’ interpretive panel located at the Wallace House. As an alternative, create interpretive messages printed on sand bags to be placed at the same locations. A third alternative would be to develop a self-guiding trail guide, available to be printed out at the ACLT web site. Have volunteer led walks and talks about the historic landscape and what it might have been like to have a homestead/farm here. The use of cell phone interpretation about the Wallace House, Barn, Cemetery, old road beds, old farm fields, etc. Pod casts about the cultural history of the area. Web site interpretation about the historic cultural evolution of this landscape from farms to in-process forest restoration.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐24
The Wallace Farm House – one of the key stops for the History Introductory Loop. Other interpretive stops are to be determined and developed. No other sites on the introductory loop, but trailhead central information point should point out other history sites (barn and cemetery).
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐25
American Chestnut Land Trust Parkers Creek Interpretive Master Plan
Interpretive Site Inventory and Story Development Form Site Index Number: T-3 Site Name: Nature Introductory Loop Trail
Site Location:
Nature Introductory self-guiding trail loop.
Main interpretive topic(s):
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐26
The main interpretation for this self-guiding trail would be to focus on the resource management programs the ACLT is currently engaged in, including addressing issues of invasive species and invasive species management. A new native plant garden is to be installed this fall (2011) and will complement the invasive plant control program by demonstrating and encouraging visitors to utilize native plants in their own gardens. Management issues to be addressed if any: None at this time.
Interpretive Objectives for this site: During or upon completion of their trail walk the majority of visitors will: -
-
See demonstration areas where the ACLT is doing its resource management programs. Understand how invasive species affect native plants and habitats. Be able to recognize several common invasive species and gain a brief understanding of their natural history (where they came from, etc.). Learn about any volunteer program associated with the resource management activities. Learn some of the key indicator species for the habitats the trail passes through and their general natural history. Understand the time line in succession from the land being used for farming to returning to natural communities once again and why it is important to encourage repopulation with native species. Understand the importance and benefits of utilizing native plants in the visitors own gardens.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐27
Recommended Interpretive Media Options:
Part of the media recommendations would be to develop one new main trail head panel to replace this sign clutter at the trail head. This would include: - Updated trail map. - Trail length and walking times. - Trail safety information. - Dispenser for trail guides/maps
Other interpretive media for this trail could include: -
Plans for a native garden brochure and signage. Interpretive panels at key locations. Trail guides/information available at the ACLT web site as PDF’s. Video interpretation of resource management programs/interpretation posted at the ACLT web site. Live guided walks and programs conducted by ACLT volunteers or staff. Potential use of cell phone interpretation and use of smart phone Pod casts about the cultural history sites, stories, and people.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐28
American Chestnut Land Trust Parkers Creek Interpretive Master Plan
Interpretive Site Inventory and Story Development Form Site Index Number: H-2 Site Name: Howard White Barn and related Homestead Interpretive Area.
Site Location: See the site location map below.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐29
Main interpretive topic(s): The main topic for interpretation would focus on the Howard-White Barn, its construction and stabilization, and historic use. We should interpret the homestead ruins associated with the barn as this is a powerful story to present to visitors. People relate best to “people” stories, and the early 1900’s farming history for this area and the eventful failure of farming and the return of the landscape to “nature” is a powerful story that the site illustrates. Site history from the ACLT Web site: Percy Howard Farm. Members of the Howard family lived on what is now Scientists Cliffs Road from 1886 until 1937. After John Howard died in 1891, the original family farm was divided between his sons, Percy and Emory. Percy's farm, on the west side of the road, included the two former tobacco fields at the land trust's south trailhead as well as land to the north. In 1924, Percy Howard sold his farm to Marmaduke White, who owned it until 1935, when he sold it to Annie and Flippo Gravatt. White did not occupy the property but arranged for the land to be farmed and built the barn in the photograph. Meanwhile, Emory Howard sold his farm to Annie Gravatt in 1937, and it became part of Scientists' Cliffs. ACLT volunteers repaired the Howard-White barn on stray weekends from 2003-2008, and the project received a Calvert County historic preservation award in 2009, as described in the Summer 2009 Newsletter. On ACLT-owned land. Buildings or remains of buildings: Barn, shed, dwelling (ruin represented by a cellar hole and hand pump).
Management issues to be addressed if any: Management issues should focus on protection of the historic buildings and homestead remains.
Interpretive Objectives for this site: During their visit to this site the majority of visitors will: -
Learn more about the construction and history of the barn and the former owners of the farm the barn is associated with. Learn about the remains of the old homestead near-by – who lived there, when, etc. Understand the role that agriculture played here in the late 1800’s early 1900’s. Understand the ACLT’s role in historic site preservation/protection.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐30
Recommended Interpretive Media Options: Recommended interpretive media for this area could include: -
Discuss the placement of a 2’ x 3’ interpretive panel by the barn. Placement of one or more interpretive panels by the home site remains. Develop a simple trail to and around the old home site. Guided tour or walk offered by ACLT volunteers/staff. Potential use of cell phone interpretation or use of ACLT Pod casts about these sites and their related stories. Self-guiding leaflets available as PDF’s from the ACLT web site.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐31
American Chestnut Land Trust Parkers Creek Interpretive Master Plan
Interpretive Site Inventory and Story Development Form Site Index Number: H-3 Site Name: Hance-Chesley Cemetery
Site Location: Refer to the site location map below.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐32
Main interpretive topic(s): The main topics for interpretation would include which families were buried here and a general history of the cemetery. Details on the cemetery are provided on the ACLT web site. The following is an excerpt from that posting: The cemetery located on land now part of the American Chestnut Land Trust (ACLT) property was once a part of a tract patented in 1666 to John Gary and called Gary's Chance. Over the years, parts of the 600 acres were acquired by members of the Roberts, Morgan, Woolf, and Mackall families. In 1816, John Mackall conveyed 200 acres of this land to Elizabeth Hance, which was to belong to her "for life or until day of marriage" and then "to the use and behoof of Rebecca Ogg, Y. D. Hance, Arianna and Sarah Hance." Elizabeth Hance was then the widow of Benjamin Hance and the others named in the deed were her children. Elizabeth and Benjamin are both buried in this cemetery. Young Dorsey Hance, their son, married 1) Henrietta Maria Chesley, and 2) her sister, Eloisa Ann, thus cementing the relationship between the Hance and Chesley families. The Ogg family was living in Ohio at this time. By the time of the 1850 census, no children of Elizabeth and Benjamin Hance were living in the Parkers Creek area. Young Dorsey Hance and his family had acquired the property known as Taney Place and were living there. The remains of some family members were brought back for burial, as was the body of John Hance who, in 1850, was keep of the lighthouse at Cove Point. The cemetery was named in a deed of 1864 when John A. C. Hance sold land to John T. Chambers as 254 acres "known as Gary's Chance or Rockhead" and running "to land now owned by the heirs of Capt. John Hance." Reserved from that deed were "33 square perches for the burial ground of the heirs of Y. D. Hance." This is the graveyard that has been restored. Like many colonial estates, Gary's Chance was broken up and sold to different buyers over the years. In the late 1930s, one section was acquired by Flippo and Annie Gravatt. The Gravatts divided the land and merged one portion into the new community of Scientists Cliffs. In 1987, the ACLT acquired the second portion, including the cemetery, from Annie Gravatt's estate. The Calvert Garden Club began the restoration in 1994-1996, remounting headstones, clearing underbrush, planting bulbs and indigenous shrubs, erecting benches and the sign. The ACLT continued the process in 2003-04, repairing several headstones and refreshing the landscaping. The restoration project received a Calvert County historic preservation award in 2005. Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐33
Visitors walking ACLT nature trails are encouraged to rest a moment at this tranquil spot, read the names inscribed upon the stones, and remember those who lived here many years ago. Management issues to be addressed if any: On-going care and protection of the cemetery grounds and tombstones. Interpretive Objectives for this site: During their visit to the cemetery, all visitors will: -
Feel that history is about real people who once had their hopes and dreams tied to this landscape and their farms. Have a feeling of reverence for the site. Learn a little about grave stone art/carvings and some of the historic meanings in grave stone carvings. Visit the ACLT web site to learn more about the cemetery’s history.
Recommended Interpretive Media Options: Interpretive media for this site could include a 2’ x 3’ interpretive panel to add information and interpretation about the site to supplement the existing marker (see photo).
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐34
Other interpretive media options: -
Live interpretation program as part of a guided walk or program. Use of cell phone interpretation or Pod cast. Identified as a stop on a self-guiding walk for the trail loop. Interpretation of the cemetery on the ACLT web site.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐35
American Chestnut Land Trust Parkers Creek Interpretive Master Plan
Interpretive Site Inventory and Story Development Form Site Index Number: H-4 Site Name: Warrior’s Rest Historic Area.
Site Location: See ACLT web site for driving directions. Main interpretive topic(s) and management constraints (from ACLT web site). The 235-acre Warrior's Rest property is both a special natural resource and a cultural resource that ACLT manages for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources. The Warrior's Rest property was owned by Calvert County physician Page C. Jett from 1955 until 1995 when Dr. Jett's heirs sold the property to the State of Maryland. The Jett Family planted the grounds with a wide variety of specimen plants and trees, thereby creating the Warrior's Rest Holly Grove and Arboretum. The ACLT maintains the holly arboretum (see opportunities for volunteers). All ACLT-owned properties and most of the state-owned properties that ACLT manages are open to the public every day of the year from dawn to dusk for passive recreation using our 15 miles of trails. The Warrior’s Rest Sanctuary, as well as the beaches and the majority of the marshes surrounding Parkers Creek, have limited public access as required by the landowner— the Maryland Department of Natural Resources. This property was purchased with special funds for the protection of the federally endangered Northeastern Tiger Beetle and the Puritan Tiger Beetle. There is only one place in the entire state where these species live and breed—the Calvert Cliffs and associated beaches. Federal and state law mandates that this area be managed primarily for endangered species protection, not recreation. Policies controlling Access to the Warrior's Rest Sanctuary. Understanding the need for the public to learn more about the Parkers Creek watershed, the state has made accommodations for the general public to access the property for scientific and educational purposes. Individuals and groups may apply to ACLT to access the property for these purposes. Application Form. A second Canoe Usage Agreement form is required if the use of canoes is requested. In addition, ACLT is allowed to invite the public to visit the property a limited number of times per year. ACLT's Guided Canoe Trips leave from the Warrior's Rest Sanctuary. In addition,
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐36
ACLT's Annual Greens Sale and Hayride in December each year provides another opportunity for the public to visit the property. See ACLT Annual Events. Interpretive Objectives for this site: Goals for interpretation for Warrior’s Rest could include: -
Have visitors learn the management directives ACLT has for Warriors Rest and why they are important. Learn about the limited access programs (canoe trips) that can be staged at Warriors Rest. Visit the ACLT web site to learn more about avenues for use of the Warriors Rest area for research and related limited activities. Continue to work with MDNR to explore other future potential interpretive programs, walks or tours that could be offered at Warriors Ridge.
Recommended Interpretive Media Options: Consider developing an interpretive panel about the history and use of the Warrior’s Rest resources by the entrance of Warrior’s Ridge. Expand interpretation of the Warrior’s Ridge habitats, and resources at the ACLT web site. Explore the potential for additional naturalist led special programs into Warrior’s Rest. Live conducted tours, programs and special events within the site use restrictions.
The Warriors Rest site can provide visitors with the most powerful contact with Parkers Creek and help them understand the relationship of Parkers Creek with the Chesapeake Bay.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐37
American Chestnut Land Trust Parkers Creek Interpretive Master Plan
Interpretive Site Inventory and Story Development Form Site Index Number: H-5 Site Name: Wallace Farm and corn crib. Site Location: Refer to the site location map below.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐38
Main interpretive topic(s): From the ACLT web site. Lemuel Wallace Farm. Home for an African American farmer who owned about one hundred acres from 1909 until the mid-1930s. Lemuel Wallace's grandson, Woodrow Wallace, reported that the farmstead had once included a number of outbuildings and that water was carried up the hill from a spring. In 1990, the ACLT moved a log corn crib to this property from a farm on Barstow Road west of Prince Frederick. Members of the Wallace family live nearby and cultivated tobacco on the fields at the ACLT's south trailhead through the 2000-01 season. The photograph shows volunteers repairing the house. On ACLT-owned land. Buildings or remains of buildings: Former dwelling, barn (ruin), log corn crib. Topics for interpretation can include: -
Early farming history (1900’s or earlier) for the ACLT area and region. Farming technology and crops planted. Relationship with the farming culture and moving harvests to the Chesapeake Bay. What crops were grown? Why farming failed in the region. The natural succession process in reclaiming farmland back to forests.
Management issues to be addressed if any: With any historic buildings, with limited security, management issues would involve break-ins into the home, and vandalism of the home and corn crib.
Interpretive Objectives for this site: During or upon completion of their visit to this site (and the Cultural History Trail experience), the majority of visitors will: -
Gain an insight into the early farming history (1900’s or earlier) for the ACLT area and region. Understanding the farming technology and crops planted during this historic period. Learn about the relationship with the farming culture and moving harvests to the Chesapeake Bay. Learn what crops were grown here and in the region. Understand why farming failed in the region. Be able to see and understand the basics of the natural succession process in reclaiming farmland back to forests.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐39
Recommended Interpretive Media Options: Interpretive media for this site could include: -
Being a key stop on the self-guiding History Introductory Loop (proposed T-2 trail). Using one 2’ x 3’ interpretive panel at the home site. Interpretation of the cultural history of ACLT in the visitor orientation pavilions at both key visitor contact areas. Continue using the interpretation of the home sites at the South Trail Head barn (panels on the exterior wall of porch. Interpretation with more historic photos if available on the ACLT web site. Possible use of cell phone interpretation.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐40
American Chestnut Land Trust Parkers Creek Interpretive Master Plan
Interpretive Site Inventory and Story Development Form Site Index Number: B-2 Site Name: Invasive Species Management Demonstration Area.
Site Location: East of the Southern trail head at the old frog pond. Main interpretive topic(s): The main topics for interpretation at this location would include: -
ACLT resource management of invasive species (removing the bamboo from the frog pond area). Primary land management activities currently undertaken – mainly mowing the abandoned tobacco fields. The exposed Cypress trees and knees in the frog pond area (see photo) and interpretation of the Cypress trees. Interpretation of volunteer involvement in the management of this site. Long term land management to maintain the control of invasive species.
Management issues to be addressed if any: To be determined. Interpretive Objectives for this site: During their visit to this site the majority of visitors will: -
-
Learn how ACLT resource management of invasive species (removing the bamboo from the frog pond area) benefits the natural environment. Learn about the primary land management activities currently undertaken – mainly mowing the abandoned tobacco fields, by the ACLT. See the Cypress trees and knees in the frog pond area (see photo) and understand the natural history of the Cypress trees. Appreciate the volunteer involvement in the management of this site. Understand the long term land management here to maintain the control of invasive species and the bamboo.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐41
Recommended Interpretive Media Options: Recommended media for this location would be to access the site by interpretive trail that would lead to a “management interpretation area” with one or more 2’ x 3’ interpretive panels. The panels could show a “before and after” photo of the site, a photo of volunteer work, and interpretation of the Cypress tree area. Other possible topics for interpretation can be suggested by the resource management staff. Other interpretive media options: -
-
Cell phone interpretation as part of a self-guiding experience. Interpretation via a live conducted walk or tour. Interpretation via cell phone download of a Pod cast. Interpretive video of the restoration program available on the ACLT web site.
Top photo is a general view of the resource management area after most of the bamboo has been removed, and the bottom photo illustrates the recently exposed Cypress tree knees.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐42
American Chestnut Land Trust Parkers Creek Interpretive Master Plan
Interpretive Site Inventory and Story Development Form Site Index Number: B-3 Site Name: Beaver Dam
Site Location: Refer to the site location map below (red circle).
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
American Chestnut Land Trust’s Parker Creek Preserve
A‐43
Main interpretive topic(s): Interpretive topics for this location would focus on beaver activity and how that activity (dam building) can affect the riparian landscape in both positive and negative ways. Management issues to be addressed if any: Possible management consideration of the beaver dam (to allow it or not allow it). Interpretive Objectives for this site: During their visit to this location the majority of visitors will: -
Be able to find/see the beaver dam. Understand how the beaver dam was constructed. Gain a basic understanding of beaver natural history. Gain an overview of how the beaver dam can affect the natural history of the area. Be able to see samples of beaver tree cutting.
Recommended Interpretive Media Options: -
A stop on a guided trail walk. A page in the ACLT web site. A web-cam on the beaver lodge (seasonal). Cell phone interpretation (as part of a total ACLT cell phone interpretation program).
A sample of the beavers cutting work found near the beaver dam. A sample of beaver tree cutting could be made into an exhibit by one of the visitor orientation pavilions.
Master Plan for Facilities and Interpretation
May 2011
