Balanced information for better care
Managing type 2 diabetes: A spoonful of medicine helps the sugar go down, but there’s more to it than that
The prevalence of diabetes is rising steadily Over 29 million Americans have diabetes,1 and up to 1 in 3 adults will be diagnosed by 2050.2 FIGURE 1. The number of new cases of diabetes diagnosed each year is increasing, Incident cases per 1,000 person years
and is projected to climb well into this century.2 18 16 14 12 10 8
Incidence data
6 4 2
2007
0 1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
2035
2040
2045
2050
Year
Pre-diabetes (HbA1c 5.7%–6.4%) is an important precursor to diabetes, and is even more common.3 About 86 million people in the U.S. have pre-diabetes, and many are unaware of it. Lifestyle changes can slow its progression, especially in older patients. FIGURE 2. Metformin, dietary changes, and exercise can prevent the development of
diabetes in patients with pre-diabetes.4
Progression to diabetes in patients with pre-diabetes (per 100 person years)
12
placebo metformin
10
lifestyle
8 6 4 2 0 25-44 years (n=100)
2
Managing type 2 diabetes
45-59 years (n=1586) Age
60+ years (n=648)
Choosing the right HbA1c target In patients with diabetes whose HbA1c exceeds 6.5%, the right goal will depend on the clinical situation. FIGURE 3. An appropriate goal for most patients will be ≤ 7%, but a tighter or less
stringent target may be advisable.
Tight target: ≤ 6.5%
Typical target: ≤ 7%
• Younger patients with longer life expectancy
Less stringent target: ≤ 8% • Frail elderly
Best target for most patients
• Newly diagnosed, without existing cardiovascular disease
• High risk of hypoglycemia • Multiple comorbidities • Limited life expectancy
Begin treatment with diet and exercise. Add metformin if medication is needed. FIGURE 4. Lifestyle changes are central to management at all stages of the disease.5,6,7
DIET • Reduce calories to achieve weight loss • Favor complex carbohydrates over simple carbs
EXERCISE • Set a goal of about 20 minutes of physical exercise each day • A combination of aerobic and resistance training is best at lowering HbA1c
METFORMIN • Reduces risk of major cardiovascular outcomes and HbA1c • Safe side effect profile • Low cost
Alosa Health | Balanced information for better care
3
Managing related conditions: a key aspect of diabetes care Controlling hypertension and hyperlipidemia aggressively can prevent end-organ damage and is at least as important as glucose control. FIGURE 5. Managing related conditions3
A
Antiplatelet therapy
B
Blood pressure
C
Cholesterol
S
Smoking
4
• Use antiplatelet therapy (e.g., aspirin) in most patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease unless contraindicated. • In primary prevention, recommend anti-platelet medication only if the ten-year risk of cardiac events is over 10%.
• Aim for BP ≤ 140/90 mmHg for most patients. • Target 130/80 mmHg in younger patients or those with albuminuria or cardiovascular risk factors. • Treatment should include an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB).
For all patients with diabetes > 40 years of age, prescribe a statin: • Patients 40-75 years without other CV risk factors: prescribe a moderate-intensity statin regimen (e.g., atorvastatin 20mg). • Patients with CV disease or cardiovascular risk factors: prescribe a high-intensity statin regimen (e.g., atorvastatin 80mg).
• Drug therapy (e.g., bupropion) or nicotine replacement can help break the habit. • Counseling programs increase the patient’s chance of quitting. • Call 1-800-QUITNOW
Managing type 2 diabetes
Most hypoglycemics lower HbA1c by about a percentage point Metformin is the best first-line agent.8 FIGURE 6. HbA1c reduction with selected non-insulin hypoglycemic agents9-11 dapagliflozin canagliflozin exenatide sitagliptin acarbose nateglinide repaglinide rosiglatazone pioglitazone metformin sulfonylureas 0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
Average absolute reduction in HbA1c (%)
FIGURE 7. In one large study of routine care, only about half of patients were treated with metformin first, even though it was the best agent in delaying the need to intensify therapy.8
Event-free survival probability
1.0
metformin thiazolidinedione
0.8
DPP-4 inhibitor
metformin
sulfonylurea
0.6
Gastrointestional side effects of metformin can be minimized with slow dose escalation, starting with 500 mg/day or even less.
0.4 0.2 0 0
250
500
750
1000
1250
1500
Days
Alosa Health | Balanced information for better care
5
Benefits and risks vary by class and by drug Some hypoglycemic agents have been shown to reduce cardiovascular events, but one increases the risk. It remains unstudied for many more. TABLE 1. Cardiovascular outcomes and adverse effects of hypoglycemic drugs6,12-17 Class
CV outcomes
Weight change
Hypoglycemia
LDL
Precautions
biguanide metformin (Glucophage)
32% reduction
loss
low risk
lowers
avoid in renal disease or insufficiency
sulfonylureas chlorpropamide (Diabinese) glyburide (DiaBeta, Glynase)
16% reduction gain
high risk
*
hypoglycemia
gain
low risk
raises
heart failure, fracture
gain
high risk
*
caution with impaired liver function
*
*
*
? pancreatitis
loss loss
**
**
? ? pancreatitis pancreatitis
raises raises
UTI, UTI, ketoacidosis, ketoacidosis, genital infections, genital infections, hypotension hypotension
glipizide (Glucotrol)
*
glitazones rosiglitazone (Avandia)
64% increase
pioglitazone (Actos)
18% reduction
meglitinides nateglinide (Starlix)
*
repaglinide (Prandin) gliptins (DPP-4 inhibitors) neutral neutral
alogliptin (Nesina) saxagliptin (Onglyza) sitagliptin (Januvia) sitagliptin (Januvia) linagliptin (Tradjenta)
* *
GLP-1 receptor agonists † liraglutide (Victoza) lixisenatide (Lyxumia) † albiglutide (Victoza) (Tanzeum) liraglutide dulaglutide (Trulicity) exenatide (Byetta, Bydureon) flozins (SGLT-2 inhibitors) flozins (SGLT-2(Jardiance) inhibitors) empagliflozin
empagliflozin (Jardiance) canagliflozin (Invokana) canagliflozin (Invokana) dapagliflozin (Farxiga) dapagliflozin (Farxiga)
* No data available. * No data available. † †
6 6
neutral
** 24% reduction 24% reduction
New CV outcome data on liraglutide pending. New CV outcome data on liraglutide pending.
Managing type 2 diabetes
* *
loss loss
low risk low risk
When lifestyle and metformin are not enough The patient’s clinical situation and data on end-organ protection can help determine which drug to add to the regimen. FIGURE 8. Algorithm for selecting treatment
• Reinforce diet and exercise at each step. • Optimize doses of hypoglycemic agents, and assess adherence before advancing therapy. HbA1c ≥ 9%
HbA1c < 9%
Is the patient symptomatic?
Y
N
Start metformin* and basal insulin.
Start metformin* and a second oral agent.
Start metformin* alone.
If HbA1c > goal
If HbA1c > goal
Intensify insulin.
Add a second oral agent.
Is hypoglycemia a major concern? If HbA1c > goal
Y
N
Add a flozin or gliptin.
Add a sulfonylurea.
Continue to intensify insulin.
If HbA1c > goal
If patient is obese, consider adding GLP-1 agonist.
Add insulin or a 3rd agent (e.g., pioglitazone or GLP-1**).
* If contraindicated or not tolerated, go to the next step. ** GLP-1 can be added when a gliptin is not selected as the second agent.
References and rationale for these recommendations are detailed in the evidence document provided at AlosaHealth.org. Alosa Health | Balanced information for better care
7
The other ‘resistance’: starting insulin Many patients can successfully achieve their HbA1c target with basal insulin combined with non-insulin agents. FIGURE 9. Initiate basal insulin first, adding a mealtime dose at the main meal of the day.
If needed, additional doses can then be added before other meals.
Start basal insulin and titrate. If not at goal
Add a single dose of mealtime insulin at the main meal. If not at goal
Add a dose of mealtime insulin at other meals.
TABLE 2. The “Treat to Target” criteria provide a pragmatic way to increase insulin doses.18
• Start with 10 units of basal insulin (either intermediate or long-acting insulin) at bedtime. • Adjust insulin dose every week, based on the mean self-monitored fasting blood glucose (FBG) values from the previous 2 days.
8
If mean FPG is:
Increase insulin by:
100-120 mg/dL
2 units
120-140 mg/dL
4 units
140-180 mg/dL
6 units
≥ 180 mg/dL
8 units
Managing type 2 diabetes
Choosing among insulin products FIGURE 10. Duration of action of insulin formulations
Lispro Regular NPH Detemir
0
Glargine
12
Degludec
24
Hours
More concentrated insulin products can be useful in managing higher dose requirements. TABLE 3. Newer insulin concentrations and packaging
Insulin type
Brand name
Concentration (per mL)
Packaging
regular
Humulin R
500 units
vial, pen
lispro
Humalog
200 units
pen
glargine
Basaglar Toujeo
300 units 300 units
pen pen
degludec
Tresiba
200 units
pen
!
U-500 preparations of regular insulin in vials requires careful calculation of volume and caution in drawing up individual doses. Other concentrated insulins are available in ‘pen’ form, which enables the patient to dial in the prescribed dose to be injected.
Alosa Health | Balanced information for better care
9
Costs FIGURE 11. Retail price of commonly used agents to treat diabetes Price of a 30-day supply of hypoglycemic agents glipizide XL (generic 10mg)
$10
glipizide (generic 10mg)
$10
glyburide (generic 5mg)
$4
metformin (generic 2000mg)
$4
metformin XR (generic 2000mg)
$10
pioglitazone (generic 30mg)
$26
rosiglitazone (generic 6mg)
$91
acarbose (generic 300mg)
$103
nateglinide (Starlix 360mg)
$257
repaglinide (Prandin 4mg)
$384
repaglinide (generic 4mg)
$21
linagliptin (Tradjenta 5mg)
$414
saxagliptin (Onglyza 5mg)
$436
sitagliptin (Januvia 100mg)
$415
canagliflozin (Invokana 300mg)
$414
empagliflozin (Jardiance 10mg)
$414
dapagliflozin (Farxiga 10mg)
$435
liraglutide (Victoza 1.2mg)
$482
exenatide (Byetta 10mcg)
$611
exenatide XR (Bydureon)
$640
dulagutide (Trulicity)
$620
Price per 1,000 units of insulin regular (Humulin R U100) (vial)
$141
regular (Novolin R U100) (vial)
$138
regular (Humulin R U500) (vial)
$152
lispro (Humalog U100) (vial)
$265
lispro (Humalog U100) (pen)
$385
lispro (Humalog U200) (pen)
$269
aspart (Novolog U100) (vial)
$270
aspart (Novolog U100) (pen)
$336
NPH (Humulin N U100) (vial)
$233
NPH (Humulin N U100) (pen)
$326
glargine (Lantus U100) (vial)
$274
glargine (Lantus U100) (pen)
$264
glargine (Toujeo U300)
$295
degludec (Tresiba U100)
$357
NPH + lispro (Humalog Mix 75/25) (vial)
$362
NPH + lispro (Humalog Mix 75/25) (pen)
$440
NPH + regular (Humulin 70/30) (vial)
$182
NPH + regular (Humulin 70/30) (pen)
$314
0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
Prices are from goodrx.com as of February 2016. The WHO defined daily dose was used to define doses. Insulin prices are standardized to 1,000 units. Regular U-500 insulin is available only in a 20mL vial at a total price of over $1,500. 10
Managing type 2 diabetes
Key messages • Diet and exercise can have a major impact on glucose control, and can slow
the progression of prediabetes to diabetes. • Aim for a target HbA1c of 7% for most patients. Modify the goal (e.g., 8% or
higher) for frail older patients in whom overtreatment can pose its own risk. • Use metformin as first-line treatment for the vast majority of patients who
require drug treatment. • Focus on adherence before titrating doses or adding a new drug. • Intensify treatment with a second oral agent for patients not controlled on
metformin; tailor the second-line treatment based on patient characteristics. • Add insulin promptly when oral agents are not sufficient to achieve A1c goal. • Manage hypertension and hyperlipidemia aggressively and focus on smoking
cessation where necessary to prevent diabetes-related complications. • Continuously promote weight control, exercise, and adherence to medications.
Extensive documentation of these recommendations and additional materials for prescribers and patients is available at
AlosaHealth.org/modules/diabetes
References: (1) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes statistics report: estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States. 2014. (2) Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Gregg EW, Barker LE, Williamson DF. Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality and prediabetes prevalence. Population Health Metrics. 2010(8):29. (3) American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes care. 2016;39 (Suppl 1). (4) Crandall J, Schade D, Ma Y, et al. The influence of age on the effects of lifestyle modification and metformin in prevention of diabetes. J Gerontol A: Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(10):1075-1081. (5) Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1577-1589. (6) Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998;352(9131):854-865. (7) Church TS, Blair SN, Cocreham S, et al. Effects of aerobic and resistance training on hemoglobin A1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;304(20):2253-2262. (8) Berkowitz SA, Krumme AA, Avorn J, et al. Initial choice of oral glucose-lowering medication for diabetes mellitus: A patient-centered comparative effectiveness study. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(12):1955-1962. (9) Bolen S, Feldman L, Vassy J, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and safety of oral medications for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(6):386-399. (10) Amori RE, Lau J, Pittas AG. Efficacy and safety of incretin therapy in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2007;298(2):194-206. (11) Vasilakou D, Karagiannis T, Athanasiadou E, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(4):262-274. (12) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837-853. (13) Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(24):2457-2471. (14) Lincoff AM, Wolski K, Nicholls SJ, Nissen SE. Pioglitazone and risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA. 2007;298(10):1180-1188. (15) White WB, Cannon CP, Heller SR, et al. Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1327-1335. (16) Scirica BM, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E, et al. Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1317-1326. (17) Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117-2128. (18) Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Gerich J. The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes care. 2003;26(11):3080-3086.
Alosa Health | Balanced information for better care
11
About this publication These are general recommendations only; specific clinical decisions should be made by the treating physician based on an individual patient’s clinical condition. More detailed information on this topic is provided in a longer evidence document at AlosaHealth.org.
The Independent Drug Information Service (IDIS) is supported by the PACE Program of the Department of Aging of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
This material is provided by Alosa Health, a nonprofit organization which is not affiliated with any pharmaceutical company. IDIS is a program of Alosa Health.
This material was produced by Marie McDonnell, M.D., endocrinologist and Director of the Brigham Diabetes Program at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Lecturer in Medicine at Harvard Medical School; Jerry Avorn, M.D., Professor of Medicine (principal editor); Michael A. Fischer, M.D., M.S., Associate Professor of Medicine; Niteesh K. Choudhry, M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor of Medicine; and Dae Kim, M.D., M.P.H., Sc.D., Assistant Professor of Medicine, all at Harvard Medical School; and Ellen Dancel, PharmD, MPH, Director of Clinical Material Development, Alosa Health. Drs. Avorn, Choudhry, Fischer, and McDonnell are physicians at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Dr. Kim practices at the Beth Israel Hospital, both in Boston. None of the authors accepts any personal compensation from any drug company. Medical writer: Stephen Braun.
Copyright 2016 by Alosa Health. All rights reserved.