LVAD UPDATE Axial Flow vs. Centrifugal Pumps
Rob Adamson, M.D. SHARP Memorial Hospital San Diego, CA
DISCLOSURES
Trainer and Proctor for Thoratec Participated in REMATCH, BTT and DT trials 94 HM I implants since 1991 >200 HM II implants since 2005
Participant in the HeartWare trial
FEELING DIVIDED?
BLOOD FLOW PATH Inflow from LV Inlet Stator
3 vanes “straighten” the flow before it enters the rotor
Rotor
Propel blood toward the exit and spins it radially imparting kinetic energy
Outlet stator
“Straightens” flow as leaves rotor and pressure is further increased
HEARTMATE II -- DESIGNED FOR LOW TE & PUMP THROMBOSIS
Optimal flow dynamics reduce damage to blood cells, minimizing the risk of TE formation
A single moving part helps to optimize the blood flow path
Sintered titanium encourages neointima formation and adherence of LV clot and helps reduce the need for anticoagulation
Ruby bearings help dissipate heat and minimize damage to blood cells, reducing the risk of TE formation
INTERNAL VIEW Outlet Housing
Rotor Magnet
Rotor
Bearings
Inlet Stator
Outlet Stator
Rev. 12.0 (3/24/04)
Motor Capsule
Motor Winding
Inlet Housing
PUMP ROTOR AND STATORS Flow
Outflow Stator
Inflow Stator
Rotor Outflow Bearing
Inflow Bearings
HeartWare Update Mike Karim, Director International
The HeartWare® Ventricular Assist System • Miniaturized implantable HVAD® pump •
50 cc displacement volume
•
50 mm outside diameter
•
Smaller and lighter than FDA approved continuous flow LVAD
• 10 liters of flow/min • Hybrid magnetic and hydrodynamic bearings creates a unique wearless impeller • Thin (4.2 mm) driveline with fatigue resistant cables • Small 10 mm outflow graft allows for expanded anastomotic options
Implanted in Pericardial Space Pericardial benefits • No abdominal surgery • No pump pocket • Less surgical time • Smaller BSA patients • Fewer antibodies due to no blood transfusions
CAUTION: Investigational device. Limited by United States law to investigational use.
CENTRIFUGAL PUMP; DESIGNED FOR LONG TERM USE
Primary flow path Washes flow channels and immediately enters outflow graft
Tertiary flow path Provides fluid “cushion”; washes thrust bearings Secondary flow path Washes underside and center post regions
CAUTION: Investigational device. Limited by United States law to investigational use.
OVERALL SURVIVAL COMPARISON TO SEATTLE HEART FAILURE MODEL (SAME PATIENTS)
Wayne C. Levy, et al, ISHLT 2011
CAUTION: Investigational device. Limited by United States law to investigational use.
ADVANCE TRIAL
HEARTWARE OUTCOME
EXPLANTED HVAD™ PUMP FROM FIRST PATIENT PATHOLOGY PICTURES AFTER 427 DAYS
Pump housing
Impeller
Images taken at Texas A&M University by Dr. Fred Clubb, D.V.M., Ph.D., DACLAM, Clinical Professor
HEARTWARE LVAD
THORATEC CORPORATION Lead the use of Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) to dramatically improve outcomes for patients with advanced heart failure
Market leadership across the spectrum of MCS
Our Values / Our Commitments Continual improvement of clinical outcomes Transparent, rigorous clinical research Increasing awareness and education
Vision for and commitment to the future of MCS*
*In development. Not approved for clinical use.
Technology innovation leadership
CentriMag®
HEARTMATE® III*
*In development. Not approved for clinical use.
HEARTMATE III* Hemotologically Friendly, Proven Full Magnetically Levitated VAD Features • Fully Magnetically Levitated
• Designed to be Hemotologically compatible • Large pump gaps leading to reduced blood trauma • Textured blood contacting surfaces • Artificial pulse
• Wide range of operation • Full support (10L / min)
• Surgically Intelligent • Advanced Implant / Explant – Engineered apical attachment • Modular Driveline
• Pocket Controller Program Status
• Target CE Mark Clinical trials initiation mid 2013 and US trial before the end of 2013 *In development. Not approved for clinical use.
HEARTMATE III*: FULL MAGLEV TECHNOLOGY Key Design Benefits: Optimized Geometry – HeartMate III secondary flow paths are ~0.5 mm along the side, and ~1.0 mm pump above and below the rotor. – Conversely, hydrodynamic bearings are typically operated with much smaller gaps, 1/20th of a millimeter or so. – HeartMate III pump surfaces are flat and flow is undisturbed, wedging surfaces and other features required for hydrodynamic bearings are not required. ~ 0.5 mm along the side ~ 1.0 mm top and bottom
*In development. Not approved for clinical use
HEARTMATE III*: FULL MAGLEV TECHNOLOGY Key Design Benefits: Fluid Dynamics – The HeartMate III rotor and volute have been designed to minimize shear and avoid stasis over the entire range of operation (2 to 10 L/min). – The relatively large secondary flow paths facilitate smooth flow transitions, generous washing, and low shear. – Impressively low hemolysis has been demonstrated in both in vitro and in vivo (plasma‐free hemoglobin always 11 years. As of July 2013 *Based on clinical trial and device tracking data
HeartMate II—Peer-Reviewed Publications HeartMate II has an unparalleled number of peerreviewed published studies in highly regarded publications including NEJM and JACC. Data featuring HeartMate II has been published in more than 350* peer-reviewed articles including:
3 in New England Journal of Medicine
17 in Journal of American College of Cardiology
14 in Circulation / Circulation Heart Failure
59 in Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
31 in Annals of Thoracic Surgery
20 in Journal of Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery
CONTINUED POST-MARKET EVALUATION ROADMAP
TRACE
Studying Class IIIb / IV patients not
Studying reduced anti-coagulation and
HeartMate II compared to medical
Enrolling in both North America and
Enrollment: 200 / 200
Enrollment: 200 / 200
SEE-HF
SSI Evaluating new techniques to reduce
dependent on inotropic support (INTERMACS profiles 4-6) management
EU study designed to involve
cardiologists and implant centers in evaluating and implanting HeartMate II in a slightly less sick patient population
Initiated enrollment in 1H’13
anti-platelet therapy in HeartMate II patients Europe
driveline infection in multi-center registry
Single-center experiences utilizing these techniques have been highly effective
Enrollment: 400 / 400 Enrollment statistics as of July 2013.
LOWEST PUBLISHED STROKE RATES* HEARTMATE II: MINIMIZING COMPLICATIONS BTT
BTT
DT
HeartMate II1
HeartMate II2
HeartMate II3
2011 n=169 142 pt years
2011 n=1,496 1,082 pt years
2012 n=281 498 pt years
Ischemic
0.06
0.06
0.05
Hemorrhagic
0.01
0.02
0.03
Unknown Type
0.01
0.02
-
Total
0.08
0.10
0.08
Stroke Rates
1. 2. 3. * *
Starling, Naka, Boyle , et al. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011;57;1890-1898 John, Naka, Smedira, et al. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:1406 –13 Park, Milano, Tatooles, et al. Circulation Heart Failure. 2012; 5:241-248. Boyle AJ, Russell SD, Teuteberg JJ, et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009;28:881-7. Based on published data from multi-center experience and separate studies, which may involve different patient populations and other variables. Please refer to the HeartMate II Instructions for Use about indications, contraindications, adverse events, warnings, and precautions (http:// www.thoratec.com/medical-professionals/resource-library/ifusmanuals/heartmate-lllvad.aspx#levelFour).
PUMP THROMBOSIS PUBLISHED EVIDENCE Study
Cohort
Device Replacement for Pump Thrombosis
Pump Thrombosis Event Rate
Miller, Pagani, Russell, et al. NEJM 2007; 357:885-96.
BTT
0.032 (2 events, 61.7 ptyears, 133 patients)
–
Pagani, Miller, Russell et al. JACC 2009; 54:312-21.
BTT
0.022 (4 events, 181.8 Pt.Years, 281 pts)
–
Boyle, Russell, Teuteberg et al. JHLT 2009; 28:881-87.
BTT
–
0.014 (3 events, 220 Pt.Years, 331 pts) Post Discharge Events
Slaughter, Naka, John et al. JHLT 2010; 29:616-24.
BTT
–
0.027 (9 events, 335.1 Pt.Years, 418 pts)
Slaughter, Rogers, Milano et al. NEJM 2009;361:2241-51.
DT
–
0.024 (5 events, 211 Pt.Years, 133 pts)
–
0.025 (26 events, 1027 Pt.Years, 701 pts) – Post Discharge Events
Russell, Boyle, Sun et al. ISHLT 2011.
BTT + DT
SHARP’S PUMP THROMBOSIS HEMOLYSIS EXPERIENCE Total number of HMII implants : 207 Total duration of support: 331.5 Pt.Years Incidence
Number
Exchanges For thrombus Suspected Thrombus hemolysis
2
0.006/pt- yr
19
0.06/pt- yr
Confirmed Thrombus
12
0.04/pt-yr
Thoratec records: Updated May 31, 2013
HM II DT 2-YEAR POST-APPROVAL OUTCOMES
Multicenter, prospective, 2 year F/U
Compared 247 INTERMAC DT patients at 61 centers to 133 patients at 34 centers in the pivotal trial EVENT
Trial
Post-Approval
Length of stay
27 days
21 days
Bleeding (surgery)
30%
11%
Total Strokes
0.13 EPPY
008 EPPY
Ischemic
0.06
0.03
Hemorragic
0.07
0.05
Device Infection
0.48
0.22
1 year survival
68%
76%
2 year survival
58%
62%
Two-Year Outcomes in the Destination Therapy Post-FDA-Approval Study with a Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Prospective Study Using the INTERMACS Registry. U.P. Jorde, S.S. Khushwaha, A.J. Tatooles, et al. Presented at the ISHLT annual meeting, April 25, 2013.
CLINICAL STRATEGIES AND OUTCOMES IN ADVANCED HEART FAILURE PATIENTS OVER 70 YEARS OF AGE RECEIVING THE HEARTMATE II LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE: A COMMUNITY HOSPITAL EXPERIENCE Robert M. Adamson, MD, Marcia Stahovich, RN, Suzanne Chillcott, BSN, Sam Baradarian, MD, Joseph Chammas, MD, Brian Jaski, MD, Peter Hoagland, MD, Walter Dembitksy, MD
Presented at the 29th annual meeting and scientific sessions of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, April 2009, Paris, France.
Event Rate
MAJOR ADVERSE EVENTS
Adamson et al. JACC 2011
SHARP DT EXPERIENCE
JACC elderly population Low stroke rate Minimal anticoagulation Need to maintain BP to avoid syncope in elderly
HEARTMATE II VS. TRANSPLANT SURVIVAL COMPARISON
39
RESULTS Factor
Transplant
HeartMate II
(N=59)
(N=102)
52
63
P