Localization of Laminin, Type IV Collagen,

0022-1554/85/13.30 Vol. 33, No. 7, pp. 665-671, The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Copyright © 1985 by The Histochemical Society, Prin...
Author: Jordan Boyd
1 downloads 2 Views 1MB Size
0022-1554/85/13.30

Vol. 33, No. 7, pp. 665-671,

The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Copyright © 1985 by The Histochemical Society,

Printed

Inc.

Original

Department

ofAnatomy

Toronto,

Toronto,

Received

Type

(K.T.;

collagen,

V.1K.),

M55

Division

September

were

ofHistologj,

and

MRC

10, 1984

heparan

localized

and in revised

sulfate

in the

side

proteoglycan,

basement

of

dissected, eye

fixed frozen

were and

mouse

through

IV

sheep

and

anti-mouse

Fluorescein-labeled

appropriate

immunoglobulins

ary

antibodies.

the

BM

of the

staining

for

sulfate

RPE

IV

proteoglycan

laminin,

but

could

all stages

also

was

localized

the

the

sen

in

less

intense

in the

BM

The

and

heparan

than

that

along

the

for basal

basement

membrane

that

separates

epithelial

and

is thought serving

barrier

and

to

as

for

(198

Grant

is an extracellular

have

from

the

tissue

formation

(1981),

functions.

These

of

epithelial

cells,

of macromolecules, and

repair

(for

Farquhar

and

Slavkin

reviews

(198 ( 1980),

see

a

as a Grant

BM

serve

as a useful

KEY

WORDS:

Laminin;

teoglycan;

Fibronectin;

epithelium;

Chick;

Price

BM

Annual 1984.

Meeting

National

account of the

Retinitis

of this work

American

Society

Pigmentosa

cluding and

Rand-Weaver

mm,

(RP)

for Cell

Biology,

Foundation

at the November

BM

24th

for IV

and

have

been

1983). (Ristelhi

considered tion

1983).

is

Three

that (TurkRel

cultures

Res,

can there-

BM

formation.

Heparan

sulfate Retinal

pro-

pigment

thought

to

Yamada,

influence

cell

(1983)).

differentiation

(Rouglahti

1982;

1981;

,

1983;

in the

1981

;

et al., to

and be

Laurie

component

1982;

al.,

1981;

Timpl

Moczar,

with 1983),

involved

Yasome

but

it is

in filtra-

and

of the

and

1982;

associated et

lam-

Yamada,

Martinez-Hernandez

development

(HSPG),

including

et al.,

Robert

appears

Ristelli,

al.

proteoglycan

Kleinman

1982;

Fibronectin

periods

sulfate

mouse molar of BM, in-

glycoproteins,

Yamada,

et

Amenta

and in developing Some constituents

a heparan

isolated

and

and

in epithehial-mesenchymal

development (Bernfield and Banerjee, 1972; as, for example, in kidney tubules (Ekblom,

to be an “extrinsic”

(Amenta

this,

is similar

in vitro

membrane;

ofnon-collagenous

1982;

of

Collagen

studying

implicated

IV collagen,

and

cells

Martinez-Hernandez

been

and

type

of

these

indicate

in vivo

VI:

collagen;

Basement

also

a number

components

in vitro

et al., 1980; Ekblom, 1981) teeth (Thesleff et al., 1981).

1), Heathcote

was presented

model Type

that

results cells

and

stages

Eye.

(1983),

has

the

all the

basic

Kalnins

Hence

concept

by RPE

that

change.

these of RPE

JE,

and

fore

and

the

BM

Sodek

1984)

The

supports important

be-

distribution

fibronectin,

during

deposited

JE,

not

in vivo

Furthermore,

material

4:413-426,

mada, by the

RPE

above

increased the

did

antiserum

photoreceptors.

generally

laminin,

of the

K, Aubin

BM,

9 onward,

of the

components

are

BMs.

region

day

IV collagen, of

composition

Martin,

2A preliminary

of

(4A0209)

the

from

staining

investigated

other,

Hynes

‘Supported of Canada.

BM

during embryonic Hay, 1981, 1983)

inas

and

the

1985

17 of development,

BM

interactions

tis-

of

(1980),

Brownell

(ECM)

connective

support

passage

1), Kefahides

matrix

underlying

a number

a structural

restricting

scaffold

(BM) cells

of

day

of type

in

to the

as second-

Introduction The

University

to staining the

intensity

different

14,

labeling

into

macromolecules

plasma

demonstrated

In addition

4 and

presence

HSPG

and

of development.

the day

development

anti-

of

used

fibronectin,

HSPG)

was

(J.E.A.,].S..

January

a diffuse

extending

the

the

sulfate

fragments

be readily

collagen,

sheep

anti-porcine were

of 20#{176}C

-

heparan

F(ab’)2

during

type

Physiologj’

accepted

RPE. gave

RPE

tween

immuno-

laminin,

(IgGs)

Laminin

in

indirect

anti-mouse

monoclonal

fibronectin.

regions

postfixed by

rabbit

mouse

central

were

immediately

collagen,

proteoglycan,

the

Sections

stained using

type

the

in periodate.-lysine-paraformaldehyde, sections

prepared.

fluorescence

et al.

of the

to HSPG,

membrane

were

6 am

in Periodontal

1 1, 1985;

Whereas

methanol

sue

Group

of chick retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) during various stages of eye development. At different times over a 4-17 day period after fertilization, chick embryo eyes

the

dude

KALNINS

form January

(BM)

and

in

1A8

laminin,

fibronectin

and v.i.

J. SODEK,

AUBIN,

Canada

for publication

IV

and

J.E.

U.S.A.

Articles

Localization of Laminin, Type IV Collagen, Fibronectin, and Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan Chick Retinal Pigment Epithelium Basement Membrane during Embryonic Development”2 K. TURKSEN,

1985

in

chick

Amenta,

retina 665

666

TURKSEN,

have

been

described

(Rolnik,

1970;

Francois

1982): 1) a period of cell multiplication and the eighth day; 2) a period of eight

and

the

after

the

hum

(RPE)

tenth

tenth

to

be

day

cells

membrane,

which

1982;

The

precise

vivo

has RPE

cells,

to

ponents

of

in

RPE

are

have

in BM that

model

the

of

system

and

Materials

underlying

1984).

the in vivo,

that

all

cells

four

of just

for

in vivo.

Cappel

these

(Turksen

com-

are be

-

in vitro as a

were

at

After

the

30 mm

at room

37#{176}C,and

then

were incubated

were

then

in this buffer

Lot

1982).

Toronto,

(BDH, in Tissue

were Tek

Ontario)

Tek

II (Lab

prepared cryostat

slips

(22

obtained from Glen Fenelon in a humdified atmosphere

rinsed

with

containing

22

-

frozen in Tissue

Tek,

0. 1 M Na2HPO4,

30%

were cases,

in 2-methylbutane Tek

quickly

No.

Naperville,

sucrose

IL).

overnight

1, Fisher)

that

prior

Six

2-methylbutane

and then mounted micrometer

sections

on carbon-coated

had

been

ionized

with antisera were dissected fixation

and

then

Lab

coverjust

prior

as described and quickly

at I : 20.

mouse

monoclonal

of

(EHS)

in

antibodies

PBS

prevent

anti-type

with

30 mm

PBS

and

Chemical,

antibodies

coverslips

On-

(DABCO) (Johnson

dilutions

in PBS:

at 1 : 100,

hybridoma

against

anti-

at 37#{176}C.

Toronto,

photobleaching

IV collagen

room

or goat

for

following

from

at

with FITC-labeled

anti-mouse,

30 mm

con(RIA)

with

mm

incubated

rabbit

at the

Supernatants

rabbit

anti-mouse

FITC

and

cultures

fibronectin

et sheep

rabbit

anti-

containing

were

used

the

undiluted.

IgGs

at

I : 30

(Cappel).

In

controls,

the

filter

set was

used.

Photographs

were

recorded

on Tn-

with Diafine (Acufine Inc.) developer. were recorded with Kodak technical with HC-l 10 (Kodak) developer.

Results We

have

studied

HSPG,

and

vehopment are

three

major

we

have

and

the

in

day

from

tissues

were

in

rather

sections

obtained

antigen distribution, to be similar with

collagen,

chick

5,9,

during

PLP

than of

greater

with

the

1 7 to

quick

freezing

quality

with

ret-

is thought

presented by

the

of the

membrane results

quick former

include

formation

followed

de-

Photomicro-

1 3, and

in the

laminin,

RPE

1 7 of incubation.

stages

prefixation

IV

of

as the stage at which Bruch’s (Figure 1 ). To obtain the

methanol,

because

BM

days

developmental

alone,

of type

the

4 to day

presented

used

then

distribution

fibronectin

from

graphs

here, freezing

and

methanol

less

tearing

approach.

of

In general,

except for HSPG (see below), either preparation technique.

appeared

Laminin Using

Swarm

were

30

5

for 5

in PBS

treated for

as appropriate,

to used

for

(PBS)

incubated

temperature,

for

methanol

saline

first antisera were replaced with PBS. Autofluorescence of the sections was assessed after treatment with PBS alone. A Zeiss photomicroscope II (Zeiss, Oberkochen) equipped with epi-illumination optics and a

the antisera

with

embedded

II.

Antisera Specific

- conpurchased

(FITC)

l,4-diazabicyclo-(2,2,2)-octane

were

at 1 : 200,

HSPG

to be mature

of the eye on an Ames

placed

stained immediately chick embryo eyes

in

nitrogen

regions were

without

frozen

with liquid

the central

20#{176}C.Sections

mm,

to use. Sections below. In some

were

cooled

through at

x

Eyes

been

radioimmunoassay

(St. Lawrence

#4-0706)

Antisera

fixed then

washed

washed

205S

0.25%

(Polysciences al.,

were

in Vinol

containing

ma as well sections.

have

were

buffered

(BSA,

G (IgGs),

sections

mounted

anti-laminin

at 4#{176}C. Frozen

anti-

1983)

FITC-labeled secondary antibodies were diluted with PBS as follows: F(ab’)2 fragments of rabbit anti-sheep IgGs at 1 : 30 (Cappel), F(ab’)2 fragments ofgoat anti-rabbit IgGs at 1 : 30 (Cappel), and F(ab’)2 frag-

eggs

eyes

monoclonal

PA).

were

albumin

film and processed Phase contrast photornicrographs pan film 2415 and developed

fixation,

and

Maryland.

Fluorescein

dried,

Sections

immunoglobulins

selective

and incubated

air

temperature. After that the sections F(ab’ )2 fragments of rabbit anti-sheep, Finally,

Prefixation of frozen sections. At different times from 4 to 17 days after fertilization, chick embryo eyes were dissected and fixed with freshly prepared periodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde (PLP) fixative (McLean and Nakane, 1974; Farr and Nakane, 1981) for 8 hr at 4#{176}C. The 2% paraformaldehyde (Fisher) fixative used contained 0.01 M NaIO4 (Fisher), 0.075 M L-Iysine (Sigma), and 0.0375 M 7.4,

the et al.,

antibodies

in phosphate

serum

for

mm

tario)

used

bovine

Sigma) 30

as above

temperature.

1%

were

components

can

at room

rabbit

Preparation

Na,HPO4.

of

Malvern,

x (Kodak)

pH

and

1984).

Biomedical,

(Hassell

Kleinman,

Bethesda,

(Connor

of secondary

20#{176}C, and rinsed

mm

for

whether

as they

prepared

at

grade;

study, BM

Sections

ments

Tissue

sera

et al.,

fragments

H.K.

ofHealth,

fibronectin

(Cooper

mm

by

Methods

(Gallus gallus) Ontario) and

of

(BM-i)

Hassell,

immunoftuorescence

IV

Embryos Fertilized chick Farms (Toronto, at 37#{176}C.

proteoglycan

JR.

Institutes

plasma

previously

F(ab’)2

taming

differentiation

these

in vitro

in

type

present these

the

RPE

of

cells

determine

in vivo

cultures

RPE

to

during

and Pino

deposited

the of

and

sequence

RPE

In

presence

pig

sulfate Drs.

National

characterization

from

1983).

that are

ofthe

against

jugated

of embryonic

demonstrated

Martin

heparan from

KALNINS

the

1981; RPE

cultures

G.R.

and gifts

SODEK,

staining

Newsome,

fibronectin

et al.,

on

blue,

et al.,

and

1978), were

described

is thought

nonspecific

et al., 1980)

bodies

Bruch’s

Alcian

BM

and

finding

colony

cells,

(Timpl et al., Detailed

epithethe

studies

Crawford

recently

RPE

Our

on

Using

(Turksen

chick

RPE earlier

Robey

of

in a particular

present

good

1975;

demonstrate

cells.

suggests

relied

HSPG,

the

appear

have

4 and

acid-Schiff(PAS), 1983;

we

the

Grun,

the second between the

pigment

day

of the

of

determined.

in vitro

sought

BM

1963;

differentiation

retinal on

Most

(Crawford,

laminin,

RPE cells

they

BM

periodic

composition

collagen,

we

of RPE

been

The

the

Crawford,

not

offinal

pigmented

16.

red

al.,

incubation.

day

using

ruthenium

3) a period

includes

by

techniques,

chick

of

and

become

mature

identification

et

day;

et al.,

between regrouping

AUBIN,

against

tumor,

BM

components

i.e., laminin

(Timplet

of the Engelbreth-HoImal., 1979), type IV collagen

antiserum BM

of

RPE

all four stages tion) (Figure

specific cells;

for the

investigated 2a) up to

laminin,

staining

from day

17

laminin for

was

laminin

day

4 (the

(the

day

day after

localized

in

present

at

of pigmentaformation

of

was

BASEMENT

MEMBRANE

OF

RETINAL

PIGMENT

667

EPITHELIUM

Figure 1 . Phase contrast photomicrograph of the RPE and surrounding tissues in day 5 (a), day 9 (b), day 13 (c), and day 17 (d). Following fixation of eyes in PLP, frozen sections were prepared as described in detail under Materials and Methods. The same fixation and preparation conditions were used for this and all subsequent micrographs.

The

highly

pigmented

layer

of RPE

cells

becomes

with time. The retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) positions of the interphotoreceptor matrix (1PM), brane (BM) are indicated in d. Bar = 10 j.m.

Bruch’s

mm

membrane staining

has been

appeared

completed)

continuous

the RPE sheet and Areas of apparently

increased decreased

discontinuities

probably

or

to

Type

IV

The

eye

are

artifactual

in

The

basal

lam-

surface

of

during development. and regions showing

either

caused

2d).

the

in intensity intensity

prominent

to

the

angle

processing

of

of

section

collagen.

Type

surface pattern

of the similar

IV collagen

2. Immunofluorescence

mouse laminin on 6 pm and day 17 (d). Laminin throughout this period. with age. Bar = 10 m.

labeling sections

at

is associated Note that

with

sheep

day 5 (a), with the the staining

antisera

against

day 9 (b), day 13 (c), BM of the RPE layer appeared to increase

Fibronectin of

studied

Figure

sections.

Collagen

distribution

was

(Figure along

due

tearing

more

and the approximate and basement mem-

type

with IV

IV

sheep

collagen

RPE layer to laminin.

also

collagen

in

antiserum was located from The

increased

the

developing

chick

against mouse type IV exclusively at the basal

day 4 onward (Figure intensity of labeling

with

time

3), in a for type

The

distribution components,

BM time

of

seam

along

of fibronectin with the

development

the

and

basal

was staining the

surface

similar to that of the intensity increasing

labeling

confined

of the

RPE

to

(Figure

other with

a narrow

5).

of development.

Discussion Heparan HSPG

Sulfate was

appearing with

associated

to

intensity

also

to the served

staining diffuse,

apical

surface

day

with

as a continuous antisera

8-9

intense appeared

In this collagen,

Proteoglycan the

ofRPE

of staining,

type

IV

collagen

increased

BM

seam

with

time

and

from

of

at the later to extend

the

RPE

layer,

starting

4b). This apical stages, e.g., day 13-17 into the photoreceptor

(Figure

from

ofchick

staining

also

labeled

the

In addition

that

all

that

seen

we obat the

(Timpl

and The

the BM

BM

fact

that

“authentic”

BM 1982;

antibodies

of the

RPE,

have

that laminin, type IV components of the BM

the

material

of chick

and

Martin,

demonstrated HSPG are

made

murine

supports

a similar

the

chemical

against

EHS

tumor

suggestion composition

Martinez-Hernandez

and

Amenta,

1983).

approximately

was more 4c,d), and

have

in vivo.

from

layer, staining

staining (Figure layer.

RPE

components

The

ofdevelopment. RPE

4 onward, to

laminin.

at the basal surface of the but well above background,

onward

day

similar

study, we fibronectin,

The at

the and

the

presence 16

cell

of stage

laminin (Leivo

in et

BM of embryonic mouse in embryonic mouse tooth

the al.,

BM 1980;

kidney germ

of

the Wu

mouse et

al.,

embryo 1983),

in

(Ekblom et al., 1980), (Lesot et al., 1981) has

TURKSEN,

668

AUBIN,

SODEK,

KALNINS

Figure 3. Immunofluorescence labeling with sheep antisera against mouse type IV cc)llagen on 6 jam sections on day 5 (a), day 9 (b), day 13 (c), and day 17 (d). Type IV collagen is located in the BM of the RPE layer; the intensity ofstaining increased with age. Bar = 10 jtm.

been

reported.

Although

its

clearly

understood,

laminin

diating

the

ofcertain

Engvall cell

adhesion

and

Ruoslahti

polarity

that

laminin

is

is closely

associated

Although al.,

BM, 1982;

that

Mayne

that

sectioned

somewhat also

seen

et

al.,

HSPG

later in the

matrix (1PM) 1PM staining

that

prior

time. zone

the

had fixation,

In

both

corresponding

at the apical ends appeared diffuse,

in

the

the

been

BM

where

epithehial

first

the

of RPE

in vivo.

eye

RPE. as well

dif-

(Fitch

report

of

cells

in many

Our

it was

to the

cells

cells

chick

of fixation,

of cells. whereas

epithelial

RPE

RPE.

prefixed

types

suggestion

BM

of

is the

of

The

located

of the

this BM

is present

in eyes without

BM

discussion,

temporally

the

been

yet

for

of since

and has

i982),

in

1983).

polarization

certain

present

demonstrated

the

(see

polarization

collagen

including

it is also

indicate

IV

not

in me-

establishing

interesting,

membrane

with

type

in et al.,

the

is

to be involved

to ECM

Chung in

of Bruch’s

development

and

is especially

development

ferent

1981;

involved

1981)

in

cells

(1983))

(Hogan,

(Hogan,

role

is thought

to studies

et

show also

It could

be

as in those

detectable

staining

at

was

interphotoreceptor

With prefixation, the without prefixation,

a

Figure 4. Immunofluorescence labeling with rabbit antisera against mouse HSPG on 6 jim sections on day 5 (a), day 9 (b), day 13 (c), and day 1 (d). HSPG is localized in the BM of RPE cells from day 5 (a) to day 17 (d). In addition, a diffuse staining became detectable, after day 8-9 (b) on the apical surface of the RPE layer. Both the BM and apical surface staining increased with age (b-d). 6 jm sections of day 13 (e) and day 17 (f) eyes labeled with PBS alone, followed by FITC-labeled F(ab’)2 fragments of goat anti-rabbit IgGs. These latter two micrographs have been deliberately underexposed in printing to indicate the low level of fluorescence background due to nonspecific binding of second antibodies. Bar = 10 gm.

BASEMENT

MEMBRANE

OF

RETINAL

PIGMENT

EPITHELIUM

669

the

staining

behing

was

result

masking However, of

of

the

cells

that

in

this

the though

the

known,

various

proteins,

has

teoglycans thus

they

immunolabehing

will

be

esting

with

time

of

layers

and

though

of

our

ofrat

in

BM

Kurkinen

the

the

though

Laurie

nectin only

in

those

through

may

our

serve

strated,

labeling with mouse monoclonal anfibronectin on 6 jam sections at day day 17 (d). Labeling for fibronectin RPE layer. The low level of diffuse apical surface of the RPE layer was from control antibodies. 6 gm section labeled with PBS alone, followed by

Thus,

FITC-labeled

ofrabbit

investigated

fragments

anti-mouse

lgGs.

underexposed background due 10 cm.

These

latter

in printing to nonspecific

to

the

RPE,

must

be

nature

an

increased

our

cells

in

If this

of

the

previously

RPE

demon-

in culture

are

(Turksen

BM

found

function,

BM

also

et al.,

of fibronectin

those

it is

filtered.

the

have

fibronectin

findings

and

during

suggest

fibronectin

all

the

4-17).

component

In

stages,

be

that

general,

of

all four the

of

to increase

accumulation

since

are

stages

appeared

Furthermore, it may

RPE

are

fibro-

(Martinez-

that filtration

that

Al-

that

others

plasma

We

association

function

(day

each

chick

to deposit

HSPG,

for

barrier.

suggested

have

reason clear.

with

that

do

not

that

laminin,

able 1984).

the

BM

contain

it,

further.

summary, cells

of

fibronectin The

is not

argued

suggest

of chick obtained

eye.

of BMs, to

BM

detect

studies

have

amounts

of the

its

with

results

not

have

known

would

that

studied

collagen, RPE

are

large

and

and

In

1983)

results

however,

exclu-

cross-react

chick

two

a variety

as a filtration

to synthesize Figure 5. Immunofluorescence tibodies against porcine plasma 5 (a), day 9 (b), day 13 (c), and is restricted to the BM of the staining occasionally seen at the not above background resulting of day 9 (e) and day 1 7 (1) eyes

1983)

that

which

then

is true

data

located

in the

could

(i982,

Amenta,

BMs

im-

surfaces

All ofthese

the

4-17) the

with

and

com-

comple-

HSPG

is not

from

who (day

between al.

certain

apical

1984).

is present

( 1979),

is associated

Hernandez ,

et

Alclearly

since

may

it differs

developing

discrepancy

least

at the

HSPG

of

series

been

reported

antiserum

fibronectin

al.

at

time

material.

not

Finally,

has

the

1PM

first

increase

HSPG.

since

et

in

of

that

this

the

other

that

to

has

of

inter-

was to

in a complex

1PM

role is

layer

results

et al.,

that that

of

finding

RPE

for

F(ab’)2

or

protein

1PM

antiserum

(Westgate

level

it

appeared

group

same

either

is interesting,

by

two micrographs have been deliberately indicate the low level of fluorescence binding of second antibodies. Bar =

another

before

Nevertheless,

layer.

pro-

biochemical

corresponds

the

RPE

nutrients

and

the

indicate

the

cells

the

core

Our

of

accumulation

by the

suggest

RPE

i.e.

the

of

its

filtration

microscope

intensity

8-9

origin

studies,

for

of pro-

Klucznik, of

distribution

in

which

Day

results

epidermis

sively

staining

retina,

with

together

eye.

the

and virtue

electron

the

are secreted

munoreactivity

the

is un-

and

further

precise

and

some

ponents

the

the

cellular

determined,

at the

8-9,

includes

the

the the

matrix

as a secondary barrier

of the

thereafter.

differentiation

of with

this

by

However,

clarify

that

at day

un-

it is composed

Adler

function

studies

note

view

(GAGs),

1PM,

a selective

regions

detectable

of

that

1981; the

may

in these to

Severin,

suggested

to

HSPG

tion

and

required

in

exclusively

indicated

photoreceptors.

and

from

determined. apical surface

itself

glycosaminoglycans

GAGs,

the

be

at the

composition

have

providing

reach

to in

in la-

or

The 1PM is an ECM located between photoreceptors (Feeney, 1973). Al-

chemical

been

and

matrix,

differences

fixation

is associated

studies

(Adler It

the

is interesting

glycoproteins,

1982).

these of

proteoglycan

precise

teoglycans

in

vivo

(Hassell et al., 1980). RPE layer and the

BM

of

Whether

inadequacies

new antigenic sites remains the mere presence of HSPG

RPE

belief

punctate.

from

these

components four

together

present

in

embryonic the

IV

BM

of

development

intensity with

of

time,

components

were are

type the

in

detectable

fundamental

staining

suggesting the

BM.

at all struc-

670

TURKSEN,

rural

elements

of

be interesting to delineate

the

or simultaneously. be

useful

to

ponents BM

at least

after

investigate as

day

earlier stages four components

Ultrastructural

serve

other

BM

to investigate whether the

4.

It would

ofRPE appear

immunolabehing

whether

one,

nucleation

or

centers

the

of

also

the

addition

of

authors

against

laminin,

invaluable fully

heparan

sections,

Adler

H.K.

proteoglycan

and ofthe

for

type

instruction

]orgensen

Middleton

MD,

and

for

A.O.

Kleinman,

Bethesda,

on the preparation Pat

the

u’ord

and

IV

collagen.

basement

They

on the preparation

Ms.

Shirley

tissues.

Hay

Reimers

The

authors

matrix:

for

of origin.

grate-

processing.

of the bovine

Exp

Res

(1982): matrix:

Eye

32:75

interphotore-

5

Proteins and glycoproteins composition and fractionation.

of the Exp

Amenta PS, Clark CC, Martinez-Hernandez A (1983): Deposition of fibronectin and laminin in the basement membrane of the rat parietal yolk sac: immunohistochemical and biochemical studies. J Cell Biol 96: 104 Bernfield M, Banerjee epithelial-mesenchymal Biol

SD (1972): Acid mucopolysacchanide interface of mouse embryo salivary

glands.

J

52:664

Brownell interactions.

AG, Slavkin HC (1980): Renal Physiol 3:193

Role

Chung AE,Jaffe R, Bender B, Lewis antibodies against the GP-2 subunit Connor NS, Aubin JE, Sodek type I collagen and fibronectin

of basal

lamina

in tissue

J (1983): Independent by normal fibroblast

expression of like cells. J Cell

Sci 63:233

Crawford BJ, Yan AA, MacDonald M (1981): Changes morphology of pigmented retinal cells during differentiation culture. Can J Zool 59:6 1 Crawford BJ (1975): retinal clone. CanJ

The structure Zool 53:560

and development

ofthe

Crawford BJ (1983): Some factors controlling retinal pigment epithelial cells in clonal culture. Ekblom

onic

P (1981):

kidney:

Formation

of basement

an immunohistological

J Cell

pigmented

in the

MG ( 198 1 ): The glomerular

RO,

Johnson Holborow

macromolecular

filter.

by ED Hay.

Plenum

Far AG, Nakane labelled antibodies: Feeney

L (1973):

in mice

and

FitchJM,

rats.

Gibney

In Cell

Press,

Biology

New

embry-

Biol 91:1

membrane:

a selective

interphotoneceptor Biol 32:101

E, Sandenson

RD, Mayne

an-

Edited

p 355-378

PK ( 198 1 ): Immunocytochemistry a brief review. J Immunol Meth The Dev

Matrix.

space

enzyme

47:129

1. Postnatal

R, LinsenrnayerTF

ME

( 198 1 ): The

L.aminin

and

matrix: 2:509

concepts

of

1:819

Retina:

their

molecular

Tissue

epithelial

KM (1982): J Cell

A Com-

In Cell BiPress, New

organization

Kefalides

( 1980):

NA

biosynthesis.

organization

Kleinman matrices

HK, in the

cell attachment.

Fibronectins:

Kurkinen bronectin

and

Chemistry Microcirc

KIebe adhesion

of base-

Nature

290:737

multifunctional

mod-

Biol 95:369

phenomenon

Adv

and

Res 9:191

GD, Davidson RS, McNamee KC, Russel EJ ( 1982): Fading of immunofluorescence of the

G, Goodwin D, during microsJ Immunol Meth

its remedy.

of basement

membranes,

structure

9:295

RJ, Martin and growth

GR (1982): Role of of cells. J Cell Biol

collagenous

88:47

3

M, Alitalo K, Vaheni A, Stenman 5, Saxen L (1979): Fiin the development of embryonic chick eye. Dev Biol 69:589 GW,

Leblond

CP, Martin

GR (1982):

Localization

of type

sulfate proteoglycan membrane. J Cell

Laurie GW, Leblond CP, munolocalization of type teoglycan and fibronectin

Martin GR (1983): Light microscopic imIV collagen, laminin, heparan sulfate proin the basement membranes of a variety of

ratorgans.

AmJ

Anat

and fibronectin Biol 95:340

to the

167:71

Lesot H, Osman M, RuchJV (1981): of collagens fibronectin and laminin odontoblasts. Dev Biol 82:371

Martinez-Hernandez

lagen

A, Amenta

Lab

(1982):

Invest

Immunofluorescent during terminal

PS ( 1983):

isolated

from

1W,

chicken

Nakane

RM,

Essnen of anionic

Cytochem

localization differentiation

The basement

of

membrane

48:656

R, Wiedemann H, Dessau Structural and immunological PK

fixative. A new fixative Cytochem 22:1077 Pino

and Dev

76:100

W, Von den Mark K, Bruckner P characterization of type 1V colEur J Biochem 126:417

tissues. (1974):

Peniodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde

for immunoelectron

E, Pino

LC (1982):

sites

in Bruch’s

microscopy.

Localization membrane

J Histochem

and chemical cornrat. J Histochern

of the

30:245

Rand-Weaver ontogeny

IV

collagen, laminin, heparan basal lamina of basement

position with

NatI

ob-

developing 146:4 15

HJ, Wilczek J, Rennard SI, Martin sulfate containing proteoglycan from Acad Sci USA 77:4494

Int Rev Connect

Yamada

in pathology.

and

of Extracellular

York,

of the

of the Vertebrate Berlin

and extracellular Modern Cell Biol

copy: a study 55:231

Biol

protein binding Res 3:3 59

basement

Cell

ular glycoproteins.

McLean

Fanquhar

Barrach heparan

Proc

Grant

Hynes

Engvall tigenic

Cell adhesive Collagen Rd

G,

B (1981):

Mayne ( 1982):

E (1983): of laminin.

PG, ofa

membranes.

Ekblom P, Alitola K, Vaheni A, Timpl R, Saxen L (1980): Induction of a basement membrane glycoprotein in embryonic kidney: possible role of laminin in morphogenesis. Proc NatI Acad Sci USA 77:485 E, Ruoslahti properties

microscopic

and pecten Ophthalmologica

Leivo I, Vaheri A, Timpl R, Wartiovaara J (1980): Appearance distribution of collagens and laminin in the early mouse embryo.

cell polarity in chick Tissue Cell 15:993

membranes

study.

in surface in clonal

Electron

antibody

p 379-409

Laurie

M, Durkin M (1983): Monoclonal of laminin. Lab Invest 49:5 76

A (1963):

epithelium synthesis.

G, Orkin RW (1981): Current structure and function. Biosci Rep

membrane.

Hogan

and

at the

KALNINS

specificity ofa monoclonal J Cell Biol 95:641

The Development Springer Verlag,

Hay ED ( 1983): mutual dependence.

Proteins

pigment to melanin

SODEK,

ED (1981): Collagen and embryonic development. of Extracellular Matrix. Edited by ED Hay. Plenum

ology York,

ment

KM (1981):

tissues

M, Lagasse

Robey Isolation

Heathcote

Adler AJ, Klucznik KM bovine interphotoreceptor Eye Res 34:423

Cell

in relation

Hassell JR, GR ( 1980):

G.R.

for the antisera

Cited

AJ, Sevenin

ceptor

sulfate to Dr.

suggestions

Literature

Hassell,

ofHealth,

L. Subrahmanyan and

acknowledge

].R.

institutes

to Mrs.

offrozen

to Drs.

National

are grateful

in choroid

Grun G ( 1982): parative Survey.

are indebted

ofthe

J, Babaey

membrane IV collagen.

Grant ME, Heathcote basement membrane

Acknowledgments The

Francois servation

chick

com-

components.

Martin

and basement chicken type

against

might

some,

for

Domain

now

development sequentially

AUBIN,

M, Price

tigenicity

and

variation

Ristelli 59: 185

L, Ristelli

RG ( 1983): Macromolecular in disease. Biosci Rep 3:7 13

J (1981):

Basement

membrane

association

research.

Med

an-

Biol

BASEMENT

Robert 82:839

MEMBRANE

L, Moczar

M ( 1982):

Robey PG, Newsome ent in primate Bruch’s Rolnik VV Translations,

OF

Structural

DA (1983): membrane.

(1970): Bird Jerusalem

Ruoslahti E, Engvall cepts of its structure

RETINAL

glycoproteins.

Embryology.

Israel

Meth

Program

Fibronectin: Rel Res

Enzymol

For

Scientific

current 1:95

con-

Foidart J-M, Vaheni A, Pratt RM, Martin distribution of type IV collagen, laminin, during mouse tooth development. Dev

GR proBiol

81: 182

Timpl Nature EurJ

R, Martin GR, Bruckner of the collagenous protein Biochem 84:43

Timpl (1979): Chem

R, Rohde Laminin-a 254:9933

H,

Timpl

R,

GR

Martin

Robey PG, glycoprotein

In Immunochemistry Furthmayr.

CRC

(1982):

P, Wick G, in a tumor

Rennard from

Components

of the Extracellular Press,

Boca

Raton,

Wiedemann basement

FL,

H (1978): membrane.

SI, Foidart JM, Martin GR basement membranes. J Biol

of basement

Matrix, p 119-150

671

EPITHELIUM

Biosynthesis ofproteoglycans presInvest Ophthal Vision Sci 24:898

E, Hayman G (1981): and functions. Collagen

Thesleff I, Barrach HJ, (198 1): Changes in the teoglycan and fibronectin

PIGMENT

membranes.

vol 2. Edited

by H

Turksen

K, Aubin

tnibution of laminin, proteoglycan during thelial cells in vitro.

JE, Sodek

J, Kalnins VI (1984): Changes in disfibronectin, type IV collagen and heparan sulfate colony formation by chick retinal pigment epiCollagen Rel Res, 4:413

Westgate GE, Shaw DA, Harrap GJ, Couchman nochernical localization of basement membrane hair follicle morphogenesis. J Invest Dermatol Wu TC, Wan ical localization

Dev

Biol

YJ,

Chung ofentactin

AE, Damjanov and laminin

I (1983): in mouse

JR (1984): components 82:259

Immunohistochemembryos and fetuses.

100:496

Yamada KM (1982): Isolation of fibronectin from plasma and In Immunochemistry of the Extracellular Matrix, vol 1. Edited Furthmayr. Boca Raton, FL, p 1 11-123 Yamada KM ( 198 1): Fibronectin Biology of Extracellular Matrix. New York, p 95-114 Yamada terials.

Immuduring

KM Annu

(1983): Cell Rev Biochem

surface 52:761

and other structural proteins. Edited by ED Hay. Plenum

interactions

with

extracellular

cells. by H

In Cell Press,

ma-

Suggest Documents