Life Cycle Assessment and Packaging Jon Dettling Olivier Jolliet
Director, US - Quantis
[email protected] Co-founder – Quantis Professor – Univ. of Michigan
[email protected]
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Life Cycle Assessment and Packaging
•Why LCA?: case study with polystyrene peanuts Packaging sustainability measurement and LCA: •What’s the function? •What packaging to consider? •Industry guidance •LCA and design •LCA and communication •The packaging context: end-of-life considerations
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
What’s Really “Green?” • An increasing number of claims: • • • • • • • •
•
100% Recycled Recyclable Energy Efficient Organic XYZ-Free Reduced packaging Bio-based “Greener!”
How do we make sense of this?
•
We need a system to weigh all the competing factors.
3
Communicate
EoL
Case Study: Packing with Popcorn?
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Example LCA of packaging material: Polystyrene and Corn Popcorn Polystyrene: Non-renewable and non-biodegradable material What about real popcorn? Renewable and biodegradable How can we know which is really a better environmental choice? How do we measure this? What are the key factors to consider?
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Defining LCA Comprehensive evaluation of the environmental and human health impacts of a product, process, or service LCA is the only internationally accepted method for substantiating a claim or decision that one product, service or technology is environmentally preferable to another. (ISO 14040 series) 6
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
LCA phases and process Definition of objectives & system Inventory of resources & emissions
Impact Assessment
Application Interpretation
•Product development •Product improvement •Strategic planning •Marketing •Public policy-making
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
Renewable packing materials: system boundaries
EoL
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Advantage of LCA: See the whole picture
LCA prevents burden-shifting
From one life cycle stage to another From one region to another From one compartment (water, air, ground) to another From one impact to another ...
Emissions displaced, not eliminated
www.quantis-intl.com
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
LCA Inventory
Emissions
Resources
Emissions
Resources
Emissions
Resources
Emissions
Resources
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Life Cycle Inventory Results Emissions Air CO2 Particles CO NH3 Water Nitrates Extractions Energy non renouv.
Popcorn g/kg
Polystyrene g/kg
620 0.2 1.0 3.1
5480 1.3 3.4 0.0
31 MJ/kg 7.2
0.0 MJ/kg 81.3
Which is better?
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
LCA Impact Assessment: Midpoint and Endpoint
e.g. IMPACT 2002+ Int J LCA 8 (6), 324-330 Int J LCA 9 (6), 394-404
EoL
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Popcorn impacts compared to Polystyrene impacts per kg materials
?
100%
Phosphates Nitrates NH3
80%
SO2
60%
NOx
40%
HC
20%
CO Part.
Ecopoints
Critical volumina
PC
PS
PC
PS
PC
PS
0%
N2O CO2
Critical surface-time
Popcorn is clearly the better choice for the environment
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Is this the right comparison to make? •
Is a comparison per kilogram per kg materials relevant? What is the packing trying to achieve? Adding mass? We need to define a “functional unit”, which gives us a proper basis for comparison To be effective, packing material must take up space and have properties to cushion against movement So our comparison is more relevant based on volume rather than mass
Phosphates Nitrates
100%
NOx
40%
HC
20%
CO
Ecopoints
• •
Part.
1 4
Critical volumina
PC
PS
PC
PS
0%
PC
•
SO2
60%
PS
•
NH3
80%
N2O CO2
Critical surface-time
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Popcorn impact compared to polystyrene impacts per m3 materials
Phosphates Nitrates
200%
NH3
150%
SO2 NOx
100%
HC 50%
CO Part.
Ecopoints
Critical volumina
PC
PS
PC
PS
PC
PS
0%
N2O CO2
Critical surface-time
By volume, polystyrene is the better choice for the environment
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Conclusions: Popcorn vs Polystyrene • “Natural” is different from “environmentally friendly” • Must consider whole life cycle and range of environmental impacts
• Impact assessment allows interpretation of results • Key parameters from an environmental point of view : •
density, number of reuse Material function or service is essential
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
LCA of Hand Drying Alternatives
1 7
EoL
LCA and Packaging
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
What is the Function of Packaging?
• To protect the product and deliver it to its site of use
-
It is therefore linked to the product amount / function If product is lost, more packaging and product must be produced to replace the function It is therefore necessary to consider the product’s life cycle when the rate of product lost might be altered
• Packaging can also have other functions (e.g. to act as a drinking container)
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Indirect impacts of packaging on product may matter: toothpaste Impact of wasted toothpaste is significant, but not enough to offset the benefit of new package
10 9
Energy (MJ)
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
Standard tube + carboard Toothpaste
Self standing tube Packing
Dosing tube
Toothpaste wastes
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Which Packaging to Consider?
Primary Packaging Switch
Causes Secondary Packaging Switch 2 1
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Which Packaging to Consider?
Secondary packaging 6 x the product mass 70 x the active substance mass
3
2
Sales representants Business travel Products Employees Raw materials Electricity
1
Buildings
Waste inceneration
Packaging
Site production
Transport
Energy production
Raw materials
0
Fossil fuel
R&D (energy)
kg CO 2 /kg product
4
CO2 at different cycle stages CO2Emissions Emissions at different Life Cycle life Stages Pharma Industry
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Life Cycle Boundary: Are you seeing the whole picture?
Sales reps
3
Business travel Products
2
Employees Raw materials Electricity
1
Buildings
Waste inceneration
Packaging
Site production
Transport
Energy production
Raw materials
0
Fossil fuel
R&D (energy)
kg CO 2 /kg product
4
CO2 Emissions at different life cycle stages Pharma Industry
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
What do we measure, is there industry guidance? • • • •
•
The Global CEO Forum has convened a “Global Packaging Project” in 2009-2010 with a focus on establishing common sustainability metrics for packaging Based heavily on Sustainable Packaging Coalition’s metrics, with heavier emphasis on LCA for environment Process now in a pilot phase with 18 value-chain pilots now underway Final output from the process planned for later in 2010
Wal-Mart’s Scorecard and Sustainability Consortium will also continue to set industry-wide focus
2 4
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Package design: Where do we focus? Supply chain operations ?
Choice of materials ?
Packaging ?
Impact of logistics ?
Form and features ?
Material weight ? End-of-life Management ?
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Where Should We Focus our Design and R&D?
2 6
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Idea & concept filtration w/ LCA Criteria: •Cost •Performance
•Environment can LCA te a evalu ate id cand ance rm perfo
LCA Informs creation of candidates and best strategies
LCA identifies best areas for action, DfE tools offer improvement guidance
LCA scenario simulations to help optimize design details
2 7
LCA supports communication on benefits of winning design
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Communication Example: NatureNes Baby Food
• Nestlé develops new baby food for European market
•
Includes:
• •
freshest ingredients new steam processing and preservation technology Unique Steam There is a desire to communicate Cooking on environmental benefits of new Process packaging (switched from glass): “Respect the “Respect the environment: Packaging reduces use of energy and emissions of CO2”
Simple Natural Recipes
2 8
2 8
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
The NaturNes Case Study Glass Jar components Steel PT Cap
Plastic Pot components Cardboard Cluster
Cardboard Cluster
PT = Press and Twist (Electrolytical tin plate, ETP)
Plastic (PP) Cap
(to group 2 jars, optional)
(to group 2 pots)
(Inside) Lidding film (PET-SiOx-OPA-PP Lid)
Paper Label
2 pieces of PP label
White glass Jar
Plastic (PP) Pot
Cardboard Tray (to group X clusters* )
Cardboard Tray
Cardboard Hood
(to group 3 clusters or 6 non-clustered jars)
(covering the Tray) * The number "X" of clusters per tray varies according to size and market
2 9
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
Main Contributors to Global Warming: Packaging Material and Distribution Plastic pot system with current logistics has longer transport distances
Plastic pot system used more efficient UHT stream process Plastic ……………………… has lesser impacts ……………………… to produce (for…… weight in package)
With “optimized” logistics network, the plastic would have an even greater advantage 3 0
EoL
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
How can we communicate this? Development
LCA
Spanish scenarios Baseline (green + red): 1010 km Expected (blue + red): 2083 km Optimised plastic (green + red): 1010 km
Epinal
System model Landfilling
Plastic Pots (simplified)
Sevares
Incineration
Recycling
1570 km Wastes
(Use)
Figures given here are only valid for 200g plastic pots sold i n Germany
8.7 g PP+EVOH
Distribution
Distribution
25% incineration in MWTP
75% substituting fuel or reducing agent in cement / steel industry
Electricity
0% recycled as plastic mixture
Collection/transport 20 km
Collection/Transport 20 km
Collection/Transport 20 km
2.19 g Inci neration of PP in municipal waste
6.51 g Plastic shredding and preparation
0g Recycling of PP
Elec: 13% LHV
- 4.17 Wh Electricity EU mix
- 29.9 kJ Heat, light fuel oil
0 MJ
-5.98 g Light fuel oil at regional storage
- 0g Virgin PP production
Capping, labelling and clustering
UHT process
*
Baby food
Filling and sealing
* *
Thermoforming
SiOx Lidding film on reels
*
Comparison on Terrestrial Acidification/Nutrification (one 200g jar or pot) + 254 kJ - 254 kJ for cement/ steel prod uction
End of Life
Trsp Packaging, coding
Steam
Functional unit 1 child meal packed & delivered
Heat: 26% LHV
+ 3.08 Wh + 21.8 kJ - 3.08 Wh - 21.8 kJ electricity heat
*
Pots ready on pallet
Container Assembly Use phase
0.009 Boundary Expansion
Distribution (Food)
Food Container Production
0.008
PP-EVOH-PP sheets on reels
Plastic caps
*
Cap / Pot Labels on tracer
Clusters
Trays and Hoods
LDPE film
(Pallets)
Raw material extraction, production, transports
Distribution (Packaging) On site Energy
0.007 Avoided burden
Other
0.006
Waste Treatment Waste Collection
0.005 kg SO2
Tray and Hood Stretch Film
0.004
Lid 0.003
Label Cluster
0.002
On site Water 0.001
Cap Pot or Jar
0
Germany
Spain
France
Before Supplier Transports Recycling and Heat Recovery
-0.001 Glass jars, Plastic pots, Plastic pots, Glass jars, Plastic pots, Plastic pots, Glass jars, Glass jars, Plastic pots, 200g, DE 200g, DE 200g, DE 200g, ES 200g, ES 200g, ES 200g, FR 200g, FR 200g, FR OPT OPT OPT
Review Panel, ISO 14040
Scientific 3 Publication 1
Labeling: “Reduces Energy Use and CO2”
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
What is the geography and context of the packaging? • Consumer behavior and public policy can influence environmental performance • A packaging that is “environmentally friendly in one country may not be in another • Consumers may recycle at very different rates • Infrastructure may not exist to handle recycled materials in some locations • Policies effect rates of recycling and incineration vs. landfill
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Is it better to recycle or recover energy? Avoided mtrl
Avoided heat Plastic replacing virgin material Plastic virgin plastic biofuel or fossils Plastic replacing other materials Plastic wood biofuel or fossils
Avoided electr.
Tot. GWP energy
biofuel or R fossil
R
-
I
I
Paper/cardboard replacing cardboard vs biofuels Paper wood biofuel biofuels R
R
Paper/cardboard replacing fossil heat or electricity Paper wood fossil fossil I
I
Adapted from Anna Björklund & Göran Finnveden
Whether to recycle can depend on what is replaced Whether to recovery energy can depend on the alternate fuel
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
Example: California’s beverage container recovery program • • • •
A successful program has greatly boosted rates of recovery? But what do we do with the containers? What end-markets should be developed to provide most environmental benefit? These end-markets will also determine which packaging options perform best within California
3 4
EoL
Intro.
Why LCA?
Function
What Pkg?
Design
Communicate
EoL
Summary of Key Points: •
To judge environmental performance, we must take a life cycle perspective
-
• • • • • • •
Categorical information like “recycled” or “bio-based” is not sufficient
LCA gives a credible and scientific basis to environmental decisions and claims Packaging LCAs must consider the function of packaging and perhaps of the product The full packaging system should be considered Industry standard and coordination are emerging LCA can help guide development of better packaging solutions LCA can provide credibility to a marketing claim The context can be as important as the packaging
Questions?
Jon Dettling Director Quantis US
Olivier Jolliet Co-founder, Quantis Professor, Univ. of Michigan
[email protected]
[email protected]