Introduction to Six Sigma

History of Six Sigma

CEO of Motorola in early 1980’s posed the challenge to achieve a tenfold reduction in product failure levels in three years.

Lecture X [Chapter 3 in textbook]

Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

1

Quality Engineering & Management

History of Six Sigma

University of Arkansas

2

Not all quality characteristics are equally important

“implementation of a measurement-based strategy that focuses on process improvement and variation reduction of 6-sigma projects”

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

Six Sigma

Focus on statistical analysis, team problem solving, continuous improvement

Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

goal is to define the “controlling critical factors”

3

Six Sigma

Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

4

Conceptual Formulation of 6-sigma

“Statistical Intimidation”

Process capability (centered process) Specification Spread Cp = Cpk = 1.0

LSL

USL

6σ Process Spread Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

5

Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

6

1

Conceptual Formulation of 6-sigma

Conceptual Formulation of 6-sigma

Process capability (non-centered process)

Process capability (non-centered process)

Specification Spread Cp = 1.0 Cpk < 1.0 LSL

USL

6σ Process Spread Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

7

University of Arkansas

Conceptual Formulation of 6-sigma

Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

8

Conceptual Formulation of 6-sigma

Process capability (6 sigma) Specification Spread



Specification Limit

6 σ)

LSL

USL



±1σ ±2σ ±3σ ±4σ ±5σ ±6σ

Percent Conformance

Nonconformance Rate (ppm)

Process Capability (C,)

68.7

317300

0.33

95.45

485500

0.67 1.00

99.73

2700

99.9937

63

1.33

99.999943

0.57

1.67

99.9999998

0.002

2.00

Assumes normal distribution in tails – “unlikely”

Process Spread Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

9

Conceptual Formulation of 6-sigma

Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

10

Conceptual Formulation of 6-sigma

Process capability

Definition of “defect” in six-sigma is very broad “any product, service or process variation which prevents meeting the needs of the customer and/or which adds cost, whether or not it is detected.”

Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

11

Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

12

2

DMAIC Model

DMAIC Model

D - Define

M - Measure

benchmark voice of the customer voice of the business quality function deployment process flow mapping Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

basic statistics cause/effect matrix process capability failure mode/effects analysis 13

DMAIC Model

Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

I - Improve

cause-effect diagrams

design of experiments

failure mode/effects analysis statistical inference control charts capability analysis

modeling tolerancing robust design

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

15

DMAIC Model

Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

16

Phases of six-sigma

1st Phase – Management Commitment

C - Control control charts

training on principles and tools to senior management

procedural adherence performance management preventive activities

Quality Engineering & Management

14

DMAIC Model

A - Analyze

Quality Engineering & Management

University of Arkansas

Dr. Steve Johnson

development of a management infrastructure

University of Arkansas

17

Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

18

3

Phases of six-sigma

Phases of six-sigma

3rd Phase – training

2nd Phase – Information Gathering

green belt – black belt

intensive communications with customers, suppliers and employees

Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

19

Phases of six-sigma

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

20

Phases of six-sigma

4th Phase – DMS

5th Phase – Business Improvement

developing monitoring systems

Quality Engineering & Management

Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

the current key processes are mapped and problems identifies

21

Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

22

23

Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

24

Phases of six-sigma

6th Phase – Conducting 6-sigma Projects improve the processes and validate them by simulations and statistical methods determine proper documentation systems

Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

4

Design for Six-Sigma

Limitations to 6-sigma

“Mind limitations”

Quality function deployment - QFD matrix

fear time pressure resistance to change lack of trust poor communication

Robust design Failure mode and effects analysis (FEMA) Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

25

Limitations to 6-sigma

University of Arkansas

26

Management limitations

lack of knowledge among team members lack of statistical knowledge

Dr. Steve Johnson

Dr. Steve Johnson

Limitations to 6-sigma

Knowledge limitations

Quality Engineering & Management

Quality Engineering & Management

University of Arkansas

lack of leadership lack of management support lack of hands-on involvement

27

Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

28

Design for Six-Sigma

Quality function deployment - QFD matrix Robust design Failure mode and effects analysis (FEMA) Quality Engineering & Management

Dr. Steve Johnson

University of Arkansas

29

5