Late or No Prenatal Care

Updated: December 2015 

  

Late or No Prenatal Care December 2015

Although there was substantial improvement on this measure in the 1990s for all races, black, Hispanic, and Native American mothers are still more than twice as likely as white mothers to receive either late or no prenatal care.

Importance Prenatal visits are important for the health of both infant and mother. Health care providers can educate mothers on important health issues, such as their diet and nutrition, exercise, immunizations, weight gain, and abstaining from drugs and alcohol. Health professionals also have an opportunity to instruct expecting parents on nutrition for their newborn, the benefits of breastfeeding, and injury and illness prevention, as well as monitor for health-compromising conditions, and help them prepare for the new emotional challenges of caring for an infant.1 Mothers who receive late (defined as beginning in the third trimester of pregnancy) or no prenatal care are more likely to have babies with health problems. Mothers who do not receive prenatal care are three times more likely to give birth to a low-weight baby, and their baby is five times more likely to die.2 However, some health researchers have concerns about the value of prenatal care as an indicator. Women who seek prenatal care are more likely to have higher incomes and intended pregnancies, which makes it difficult to measure the unique effects of prenatal care.3 Prenatal care does not always address, and may not be as effective among, women with specific social and medical risks.4 Adequacy of care (defined by the frequency and timing of visits), however, has been correlated with positive outcomes and may also confer benefits such as reduced likelihood of post-partum depression and infant injuries.5

2 | P a g e  

  

Late or No Prenatal Care December 2015

Trends With the exception of a period during the 1980s, in general there has been a positive downward trend in this indicator since the 1970s. The percentage of births where the mother received late or no prenatal care dropped by more than a third from 1989 to 2003, from six to four percent. Between 2003 and 2006 there was little apparent change, until an increase in 2007; however, comparisons are complicated by the states’ transition to a revised birth certificate, a process which began in 2003 and was still not completed as of 2014 (see Definition section). Consequently, nationwide year-to-year comparisons are problematic, and not possible at all between 2006 and 2007. (Figure 1) Figure 1

Percentage of Births to Mothers Receiving Late or No Prenatal Care, Selected Years: 1970-2014*

10

8

7.9 7.1

Percent

6.4 5.6

6 6.0 4

5.1 Births in all States

2

6.0

4.4 3.9 3.6

6.0

3.6

3.5

Births in states using the 1989 birth certificate revision Births in states using the 2003 birth certificate revision

0 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 *Note: Data for 2003 -2006 include only those jurisdictions using the 1989 revision of the birth certificate. Data for 2007 forward include only those jurisdictions using the 2003 revision of the birth certificate. More details are available in the notes to Appendix 1. Sources: Data for 1970-1999: Eberhart MS, Ingram DD, Makuc DM, et al. Urban and Rural Health Chartbook Health, United States, 2001. Hyattsville, Maryland: National C enter for Health Statistics. 2001: Table 6; Data for 2000:Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Park MM. Births: Final Data for 2000. National Vital Statistics Reports; vol 50 no. 5. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 2002.; Data for 2001: Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Park MM, Sutton PD. Births: Final data for 2001. National vital statistics reports; vol 51 no.2. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 2002. Tables 24, 25 and 33. Data for 2002 from: Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD. Ventura SJ. Menacker F. Munson, ML. Births: Final Data for 2002. National vital statistics reports; vol 52 no 10. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 2003. Tables 24, 25, and 33. Data for 2003: Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. (2005). "Births: Final data for 2003. " National Vital Statistics Reports, 54(2). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Tables 24, 25, and 33. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr54/nvsr54_02.pdf. Data for 2004-2006 and 2014: National C enter for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System, VitalStats. http://205.207.175.93/VitalStats/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=15101 Data for 2007-2013: National Center for Health Statistics, C DC WONDER. http://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D27

3 | P a g e  

  

Late or No Prenatal Care December 2015

Differences by Race and Hispanic Origin6 In 2014, American Indian and Alaska Native women were the most likely to receive late or no prenatal care (11 percent of births), followed by black (10 percent) and Hispanic women (eight percent). In contrast, only six percent of 2014 births among Asian or Pacific Islander women, and four percent of births among white women, were births where the mother received late or no prenatal care. (Figure 2) Figure 2

Percentage of Mothers Receiving Late or No Prenatal Care, by Race and Hispanic Origin: 2014* 15

10.8 9.7

10

Percent

7.5 5.7 5

4.3

0 Non-Hispanic white

Non-Hispanic black

Hispanic

Asian or Pacific Islander

American Indian or Alaska Native

*Note: Data exclude those jurisdictions using the 1989 revision of the birth certificate (4 states, representing 4 percent of births) . Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.

VitalStats online tool. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/vitalstats.htm.

There is substantial variation in prenatal care receipt by subgroups within both the Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander categories. Among Hispanics in 2014, the percentage of women receiving late or no prenatal care ranged between three percent for mothers of Cuban origin, to six percent for mothers of Puerto Rican origin, eight percent for mothers of Mexican origin, and nine percent for mothers of Central or South American origin. Similarly, among Asian or Pacific Islander women in 2014, those receiving late or no prenatal care ranged between four percent of births (among mothers of Japanese origin), and nine percent of births (for mothers of Hawaiian or part-Hawaiian origin).a (Appendix 1)

                                                                  a

Data from Hawaii were not available for 2014, so this figure refers only to those Native Hawaiians living

outside of the state.

4 | P a g e  

  

Late or No Prenatal Care December 2015

Differences by Age Young women in their teens are by far the least likely to receive timely prenatal care. In 2014, 25 percent of births to females under age 15, and 10 percent of births to teens ages 15 to 19, were to those receiving late or no prenatal care. This proportion drops with increasing age, reaching a low of 4.5 percent for women in their thirties, and then increases slightly to 5.3 percent among older women. (Figure 3) Figure 3

Percentage of Births to Mothers Receiving Late or No Prenatal Care, by Age of Mother: 2014* 30

25

24.6

Percent

20

15 10.4 10

7.8 5.6

5

4.5

4.6

5.3

30-34 years

35-39 years

40 years and over

0 Under 15 years

15-19 years

20-24 years

25-29 years

*Note: Data exclude those jurisdictions using the 1989 revision of the birth certificate (4 states, representing 4 percent of births). Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. VitalStats online tool. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/vitalstats.htm.

State and Local Estimates Estimates of the percentage of births to mothers who received late or no prenatal for 20032013 are available for all states and the 50 largest U.S. cities at the KIDS COUNT Data Center: http://datacenter.kidscount.org/data#USA/2/27/28

5 | P a g e  

  

Late or No Prenatal Care December 2015

International Estimates The most recent estimates of the percentage of women who received prenatal care at least once during pregnancy are available from UNICEF at http://data.unicef.org/maternalhealth/antenatal-care.html.

National Goals The Healthy People 2020 initiative has set a goal of increasing the proportion of pregnant women who receive care in the first trimester from 71 percent in 2007 to 78 percent in 2020, as well as a goal to increase the proportion of pregnant women who receive early and adequate prenatal care from 70.5 percent in 2007 to 77.6 percent in 2020.

More information is available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/maternal-infant-and-childhealth/objectives (goal MICH 10)

Related Indicators 

Mothers Who Smoke While Pregnant: www.childtrends.org/?indicators=mothers-whosmoke-while-pregnant



Low and Very Low Birthweight Infants: www.childtrends.org/?indicators=low-andvery-low-birthweight-infants



Unintended Births: www.childtrends.org/?indicators=unintended-births



Infant, Child, and Teen Mortality: www.childtrends.org/?indicators=infant-child-andteen-mortality

Definition Late or no prenatal care is calculated as the percentage of births that occur to mothers who, on their child’s birth certificate, reported receiving prenatal care only in the third trimester of their pregnancy, or reported receiving no prenatal care. Beginning in 2003, states and other jurisdictions began adopting a new revision of the standard birth certificate, and the last states transitioned in 2014. National data for years prior to 2003 are not strictly comparable with

6 | P a g e  

  

Late or No Prenatal Care December 2015

data for subsequent years, because the 1989 revision asks for the month that prenatal care began, while the 2003 revision asks for the date of the first prenatal visit. Because of this inconsistency, data from states using different versions of the birth certificate are not comparable. Data through 2006 reflect only those jurisdictions which had not yet adopted the 2003 certificate revision (see table below). Data for 2007 forward include only those jurisdictions that have adopted the 2003 certificate revision (see table below). Although New York State began using the 2003 revision in 2004, New York City continued to use the 1989 revision until 2008, and is excluded for 2007. For details on this change, see http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vital_certificate_revisions.htm.

% Births Not Year

States Not Included (out of 50 states and DC)

Included

2003

2 (PA, WA)

6

2004

9 (FL, ID, KY, NH, NY, PA, SC, TN, WA)

20

2005

13 (FL, ID, KS, KY, NE, NH, NY, PA, SC, TN, TX, VT, WA)

31

18 (DE, FL, ID, KS, KY, NE, NH, NY, ND, OH, PA, SC, SD, TN, TX, VT,

35

2006

WA, WY) 30 (AL, AK, AZ, AR, CT, DC, FL, GA, HI, IL, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI MN,

2007

MS, MO, MT,NV, NM, NY, NC, OK, OR, RI, UT, VA, WV, WI) 27 (AL, AK, AZ, AR, CT, DC, FL, GA, HI, IL, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN,

2008

35

MS, MO, NV, NJ, NC, OK, RI, UT, VA, WV, WI) 26 (AL, AK, AZ, AR, CT, DC, FL, GA, HI, IL, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN,

2009

47

34

MS, MO, NV, NJ, NC, OK, RI, VA, WV, WI) 20 (AL, AK, AZ, AR, CT, FL, GA, HI, LA, ME, MA, MI, MN, MS, NJ, NC,

24

2010

RI, VA, WV, WI)

2011

15 (AL, AK, AZ, AR, CT, HI, ME, MA, MI, MN, MS, NJ, RI, VA, WV)

17

2012

13 (AL, AK, AZ, AR, CT, HI, ME, MI, MS, NJ, RI, VA, WV)

17

2013

10 (AL, AZ, AR, CT, HI, ME, MI, NJ, RI, WV)

13

2014

4 (CT, HI, NJ, RI)

4

7 | P a g e  

  

Late or No Prenatal Care December 2015

Data Sources 

Data for 2003-2006 and 2014; by age 1990-1999 and 2007-2013; and Asian subgroups 2009-2013: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. VitalStats online tool. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/vitalstats.htm.



All other data for 2007-2013: National Center for Health Statistics, CDC WONDER online tool. Available at: http://wonder.cdc.gov/natality-current.html



Data for 2002: Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Sutton, P. D., Ventura, S. J., Menacker, F., Munson, M,L. (2003). Births: Final data for 2002. National Vital Statistics Reports, 52 (10). Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. Tables 24, 25, and 33. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr52/nvsr52_10.pdf



Data for 2001: Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Ventura, S.J., Menacker, F., Park, M. M., Sutton, P. D. (2002) Births: Final data for 2001. National Vital Statistics Reports,51 (2). Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. Tables 24, 25, and 33. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr51/nvsr51_02.pdf



Data for 2000: Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Ventura, S. J., Menacker, F., Park, M. M. (2002) Births: Final data for 2000. National Vital Statistics Reports, 50(5). Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr50/nvsr50_05.pdf



Data for 1970-1999: Eberhart, M. S., Ingram, D. D., Makuc, D. M., et al. (2001). Urban and

rural health chartbook: Health, United States, 2001. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. Table 6. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus/previous.htm

Raw Data Source Birth Data, National Vital Statistics System http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss.htm

8 | P a g e  

  

Late or No Prenatal Care December 2015

Appendix 1 - Births to Mothers Receiving Late or No Prenatal Care, as a Percentage of All Births, by Race, Hispanic Origin, and Age of Mother: Selected Years, 1970-20141 1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2002

20032

20052

20062

20073

20083

20093

20103

20113

20123

20133

20143

All Births

7.9

6.0

5.1

5.7

6.1

4.2

3.9

3.6

3.5

3.5

3.6

7.1

7.0

6.6

6.2

6.0

6.0

6.1

6.0

White

6.3

5.0

4.3

4.8

4.9

3.5

3.3

3.1

3.0

3.0

3.2

6.5

6.3

5.9

5.5

5.2

5.2

5.3

5.2

-

-

3.5

4.0

3.4

2.5

2.3

2.2

2.1

2.2

2.3

5.0

4.8

4.5

4.3

4.3

4.3

4.4

4.3

16.6

10.5

8.9

10.2

11.3

7.6

6.7

6.2

6.0

5.7

5.7

11.7

11.3

10.6

10.2

9.8

9.8

10.0

9.6

-

-

9.7

10.9

11.2

7.6

6.7

6.2

6.0

5.6

5.7

11.7

11.3

10.6

10.2

9.8

9.9

10.0

9.7

-

-

12.0

12.4

12.0

7.4

6.3

5.5

5.3

5.1

5.0

9.3

9.2

8.8

8.1

7.5

7.5

7.6

7.5

8.1

6.9

5.8

5.6

5.0

5.0

9.7

9.6

9.3

8.4

7.8

7.8

7.9

7.7

Non-Hispanic White5 Black Non-Hispanic Black5 Hispanic origin4,5 Mexican

-

-

11.8

12.9

13.2

Puerto Rican

-

-

16.2

15.5

10.6

5.5

4.5

4.1

3.7

4.1

4.1

7.6

7.8

6.9

6.6

6.2

6.4

6.2

5.7

Cuban

-

-

3.9

3.7

2.8

2.1

1.4

1.3

1.3

2.5

3.2

3.4

3.3

3.4

3.2

3.2

3.3

3.5

3.4

Central and South American

-

-

13.1

12.5

10.9

6.1

5.4

4.9

4.7

5.6

5.8

8.3

9.2

8.5

8.2

7.7

7.7

8.0

8.7

Other and unknown Hispanic

-

-

9.2

9.4

8.5

6.0

5.9

5.3

5.4

5.6

4.9

8.9

8.5

7.9

7.5

7.2

7.2

7.5

7.0

Asian or Pacific Islander

-

-

6.5

6.5

5.8

4.3

3.3

3.1

3.1

3.0

3.1

4.9

5.3

4.9

5.1

5.2

5.0

5.4

5.7

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

4.6

4.5

4.7

4.5

4.7

4.6

Chinese

6.5

4.4

3.7

4.4

3.4

3.0

2.2

2.1

-

-

-

-

-

3.2

3.7

3.8

4.3

5.3

6.3

Japanese

4.1

2.7

2.1

3.1

2.9

2.3

1.8

2.1

-

-

-

-

-

3.2

3.2

3.3

3.2

3.2

3.5

Filipino

Asian Indian

7.2

4.1

4.0

4.8

4.5

4.1

3.0

2.8

-

-

-

-

-

4.0

4.1

4.3

4.1

3.9

3.7

Hawaiian and part Hawaiian

-

-

6.7

7.4

8.7

5.1

4.2

4.7

-

-

-

-

-

9.6

8.5

10.1

8.7

12.3

8.8

Other Asian or Pacific Islander

-

-

9.3

8.2

7.1

5.0

3.8

3.5

-

-

-

-

-

6.4

6.8

6.6

6.1

6.6

6.8

28.9

22.4

15.2

12.9

12.9

9.5

8.6

8.0

7.6

8.2

8.1

13.1

12.6

11.4

11.3

11.2

11.0

11.3

10.8

American Indian or Alaska Native

9 | P a g e  

  

Late or No Prenatal Care December 2015

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2002

20032

20052

20062

20073

20083

20093

20103

20113

20123

20133

20143

Under 15 years

-

-

-

-

20.3

15.3

16.3

14.8

15.4

15.0

15.6

23.2

26.0

22.0

22.0

22.2

22.4

23.1

24.6

15-19 years

-

-

-

-

11.9

7.6

7.2

6.6

6.4

6.3

6.4

12.0

11.8

11.1

10.6

10.2

10.3

10.5

10.4

Age

15-17 years

-

-

-

-

-

-

8.6

8.0

7.6

-

-

14.1

13.4

12.7

12.5

12.2

12.2

12.6

12.7

18-19 years

-

-

-

-

-

-

6.4

6.0

5.6

-

-

11.1

11.0

10.3

9.9

9.4

9.6

9.7

9.5

20-24 years

-

-

-

-

8.0

5.4

5.1

4.7

4.6

4.5

4.7

9.4

9.1

8.6

8.2

7.9

7.9

8.1

7.8

25-29 years

-

-

-

-

4.4

3.3

3.1

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.2

6.2

6.1

5.8

5.5

5.3

5.4

5.7

5.6

30-34 years

2.4

2.3

2.3

2.3

2.4

4.7

4.8

4.5

4.3

4.2

4.3

4.5

4.5

-

-

-

-

3.4

2.7

35-39 years

-

-

-

-

3.8

3.0

2.6

2.5

2.4

2.4

2.5

4.6

4.7

4.5

4.4

4.3

4.3

4.5

4.6

40 years and over

-

-

-

-

5.6

3.9

3.5

3.3

3.2

3.2

3.1

5.6

5.5

5.2

5.3

5.0

5.2

5.4

5.3

"-" Indicates data not available. 1

Excludes live births for which trimester when prenatal care began is unknown. Data for 1970 and 1975 also exclude births that occurred in states not reporting prenatal care.

2

Data are for the reporting areas that used the 1989 Revision of the U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth for prenatal care. Reporting areas that implemented the 2003 revision of the U.S.

Standard Certificate of Live Birth are excluded because prenatal care data based on the 2003 revision are not comparable with data based on the 1989 revision. In 2003, 48 states and DC, representing 94 percent of births, used the 1989 revision. In 2004, 41 states and DC, representing 80 percent of births, used the 1989 revision. In 2005 it was 37 states and DC, representing 69 percent of births. In 2006 it was 32 states and DC, representing 65 percent of births. Although New York state began using the 2003 revision in 2004, New York City continued to use the 1989 revision, and is included in these estimates. 3

Data are for the reporting areas that used the 2003 Revision of the U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth for prenatal care. Reporting areas that did not yet implement the 2003 revision of

the U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth are excluded because prenatal care data based on the 2003 revision are not comparable with data based on the 1989 revision. In 2007, 20 states, representing 53 percent of births, were using the 2003 revision. In 2008, 24 states, representing 65 percent of births, were. In 2009, 25 states, representing 66 percent of births were using the 2003 revision, in 2010, 30 states and DC, representing 76 percent of births, in 2011, 35 states and DC, representing 83 percent of births, in 2012, 37 states and DC, representing 83 percent of births, in 2013, 40 states and DC, representing 87 percent of all births, and, in 2014, 46 states and DC, representing 96 percent of births. Although New York state began using the 2003 revision in 2004, New York City continued to use the 1989 revision until 2008, and is excluded for 2007. 4

Persons of Hispanic origin may be of any race.

10 | P a g e  

  

Late or No Prenatal Care December 2015

5

Trend data for Hispanics and non-Hispanics are affected by expansion of the reporting area for an Hispanic-origin item on the birth certificate and by immigration. These two factors affect

numbers of events, composition of the Hispanic population, and maternal and infant health characteristics. The number of states in the reporting area increased from 22 in 1980, to 23 and the District of Columbia (DC) in 1985, 48 and DC in 1990, and 50 and DC in 1993 and all later years. Sources: Data for 1970-1999: Eberhart, M. S., Ingram, D. D., Makuc, D. M., et al. (2001). Urban and rural health chartbook: Health, United States, 2001. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. Table 6. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus/previous.htm. Data for 2000: Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Ventura, S. J., Menacker, F., Park, M. M. (2002) Births: Final data for 2000. National Vital Statistics Reports, 50(5). Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr50/nvsr50_05.pdf. Data for 2001: Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Ventura, S.J., Menacker, F., Park, M. M., Sutton, P. D. (2002) Births: Final data for 2001. National Vital Statistics Reports,51 (2). Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. Tables 24, 25, and 33. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr51/nvsr51_02.pdf. Data for 2002: Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Sutton, P. D., Ventura, S. J., Menacker, F., Munson, M,L. (2003). Births: Final data for 2002. National Vital Statistics Reports,52 (10). Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. Tables 24, 25, and 33. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr52/nvsr52_10.pdf. Data for 2003-2006 and 2014; by age 1990-1999 and 2007-2011; and Asian subgroups 2009-2013: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. VitalStats online tool. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/vitalstats.htm. All other data for 2007-2013: National Center for Health Statistics, CDC WONDER online tool. Available at: http://wonder.cdc.gov/natality-current.html.

11 | P a g e  

 Late or No Prenatal Care December 2015

Endnotes                                                                   1

Hagan, J. F., Shaw, J. S., and Duncan, P. M., Eds. (2008). Bright Futures: Guidelines for health supervision

of infants, children, and adolescents. (3rd Ed.) J. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics Available at: http://brightfutures.aap.org/3rd_Edition_Guidelines_and_Pocket_Guide.html 2

Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of

Health and Human Services. Prenatal services. http://www.mchb.hrsa.gov/programs/womeninfants/prenatal.htm 3

Logan, C., Moore, K., Manlove, J., Mincieli, L., Cottingham, S. (2007). Conceptualizing a “Strong Start”:

Antecedents of positive child outcomes at birth and Into early childhood. Child Trends Research Brief. Child Trends: Washington, D.C. 4

Alexander, G.R., Kotelchuck, M. (2001). Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: History,

challenges, and directions for future research. Public Health Reports, 116(4). 306-16. 5

Ibid.

6

Hispanics may be any race. Estimates for whites and blacks in this report do not include Hispanics.

12 | P a g e