Iron absorption from the whole diet in men: how effective is the regulation of iron absorption?13

Iron absorption from the whole diet in men: how effective is the regulation of iron absorption?13 L’i/’ Hallbeig, ABSTRACT tamed Iron absorption a...
Author: Audrey Thornton
0 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Iron absorption from the whole diet in men: how effective is the regulation of iron absorption?13 L’i/’

Hallbeig,

ABSTRACT tamed

Iron absorption

a highly

men.

meals

was

labeled

added

in amounts

Heme

iron

cabby

labeled

including

labeled with

total

to cover

iron

60

concentration will

occur

by

that

in normal

to iron

ji.g/L iron

subjects

there

is no risk

indicated

serum

fernitin

an effective

of developing

weight

was

the

a high

iron

bioavailability.

gest that translation stored iromi should high

serumii should

heme-

amid

status

and women These

new

concentrations.

be

iron

identical

There

causes

absorption

different.

but

Aiim J Cli,,

than

Nuir

relations

and

WORDS

iron,

men,

Iron

iron

absorption.

overload,

iron.

ferritin.

diet.

iron

iron

tracer

iron

of both

sorption

of

to

between

hemiie-

studies.

The

iron

lated ( I I

an

INTRODUCTION

between

tions

and

of iron

iron

absorption

deficiency

effective

is

relation

( 1-9).

and

the

less

regulation

in states

of

iron

for example. obvious

AI?l

J (liii

deficiency

in women conclusion Niar

is

l997:66:347-56.

that

iron

iron

iron

fernitin is absorbed

stores

are

absorption

to

in otherwise absorption can

normal increase

and

and

More

when of

deficiency and iron overload It is well known that iron

serum

that

iron

deficiency

way that

was

I

2

How iron

in USA.

U

American

between

two

studies

total

only

an extrinsic

the

same

specific

by

studies

between

in total

iron

measured

using

relations

observed

in other women.

in

aniounts

of’

requirements

menstrual

calcu-

iron

losses

total

the

fiur

diets

5 or of

for amounts

Medicine.

with

different

10 d. Linear iron absorbed

Department

Annedalsklinikerna.

Swedish

and reprint

Gioehorg

Medical

iron

relations and log

of Clinical

Sahlgrcnski

GOteborg

Swedish

Council

and

997/88L

I l3:3).

requests

to L I-lallberg. Annedalsklinikerna.

5-4 1 3 45.

Jamiuarv

Accepted

fr

Nutri-

t niversimy

for

Council Forestry

Depanimetit

(project and

of Climiical

Sahlgrenska

B94.

Agriculture Nutri-

University

Sweden.

2 I . 1997.

publication

Nutrition

Research

the

University.

Received

Clinical

in women served

Sweden.

by

(50.0120/95

Hospital.

fir

and

in

individual

and

of Internal

Goteborg.

Supported

tioii.

Socict

and

University.

Address

is common,

997

first

absorption

validated

weights

were

Gtehorg

Research

teenagers in most populations. The the regulation of dietary iron abPrinted

the

by adding

tracer

agreement

studies

two

l9X-0472l-l9A

subjects? severalfild

was

absorbed

Froni the Institute

Hospital.

in a state

prevent

detertiiine

to achieve

radioiron

good

body

found

tioii.

concentrareplete.

regulation

).

were

inverse

to

In the

nonheme-iron

method

iron

from

In these

is an

periods.

on the

the whole diet ( I 0). The labeling of’ all nonheme

measured

in amounts

and

hioavailahilities

there

was

differdif-

diet.

in all meals.

inorganic

there

dietary

bioavailahility

iron stores in some unknown Several studies have shown

whole

balance

studies

of

because balance

of all nonheme iron in all daily meals served over several days ( 10. 1 1 ). In these two previous studies, heme-iron absorption from the same meals was calculated from the ab-

stores.

It is well established that influence iron absorption.

long

for

a method

absorption

inorganic

nonheme iron

requires

been

studies

activity

1997:66:347-56.

heme

serum

the

developed

all heme

has

direct

no

to

of iron

diet,

the whole diet The chemical

of dietary iron absorbed from is based on a separate uniform

whom

KEY

and

suitable

from

we

nonheme-iron

sug-

increased

control

their

iron

into amounts of in subjects with

effective

was

amount method

with

strongly

absorption

in the

been

he

(8).

development is

have

to

in rekoion

iron absorption is measured as the intake and fecal loss. is technically is not

method

Recently.

same body

diets

inaccurate.

of iron

Similar both of

to prevent

of iron absorption from method has been available.

rather

considered

recently

needed

There

ficult.

he

regulation

examined

than

extensively.

which dietary

this

was

iron

may

ofthis

absorption

more

method. with ence between

Thus.

overload

At the kilogram

observations

other

considered.

nonheme-iron

were

served

stores

less

regulation suitable

ho

suggest

is firtified. in women.

of serum ferritin concentration be made with caution and that

femtin

stores

in men

same

the

ferritin

thus

control of absorption. the absorption per

concentration

suffi-

of iron

findings

by iron absorption from the diet even if the diet findings were made previously in two studies which

serum

just

of iron

diet

is not sufficiently effective with high physiologic iron

diet

efficacy

and

when

studied

the

when

The

requirements

Regulation

this

at a serum

even

adequate.

overload.

good

ferritin

a bevel

accumulation The

iron

of

serum At

to that

absorption.

a

concentration

absorption.

implying

no further

dietary

was

with

decreased

requirements.

generally

hiosyntheti-

There and

in all tracer

in all meals.

hemoglobin

In subjects

losses,

iron

radioiron

tracer.

absorption

basal

using

sorption to meet iron requirements to prevent iron deficiency in those

con-

f’or 5 d in

activity

absorption

60 pg/L. no relation

concentration.

cient

by

which

Nonheme

specific

radioiron

between

diet.

measured

inorganic

uniform

similarly

whole

was

donors.

extrinsic.

another

serum ferritin up to > 60 p.g/L there was

the

March

26.

1997.

347

Downloaded from www.ajcn.org by guest on July 13, 2011

relation

ferritin

an

Gra??zatkot’.ski

of iron,

12 blood

with

to ensure

was

from

firm

hioavailahle

31 healthy

inverse

Hiilt#{233},i, (111(1 Elizabet

Leiza

348

HALLBERG

serum

fernitin.

The

significantly that

the

scale

slopes

different. lines

the

low

to estimated

this

basal

serum

four

regression

interest

was

to a point

absorption

estimated

that

the

special

converged

corresponding

Fe. The

of

Of

iron

obtained losses

on

range

from

suggesting

that

iron

the

did body,

the

are

mg

not

suggesting

in men

Technology

at the

informed

that

that

the

suitable We took

because

than

in

high

regular

absorption

me

relation

in men,

and

men

blood

iron

absorption

both

groups

with

iron

over

small

several

absorption

including

both

We

and

serum

also

served

an

and

the

serum

and iron

compared

fernitin

days

healthy

or negligible

donors. were

diet

to measure

men, stores

the

in men

identical

diet

to examfernitin

women

with

of

of

iron

conditions.

status

under

realistic

about nations.

because

whom

bio-

iron status and to examine absorption from the whole diet

AND

Forty

men

the and

rate,

from

the staff the

The

of the

subjects’

TABLE I Characteristics

and

student

School

of

body

of the Sahlgrenska

Dentistry.

the

the

reasons The

were

Age (y) Body weight

(kg)

Height(cm)

(Pm

for

exclusion

and

3 1 men

blood

donors.

The

characteristics

laboratory

screening

pacity,

total

serum

serum

Blood

by

(n

(22-59)

=

26.3

±

7.67

(20-55)

34.3

±

13.4

75.5

±

9.l7

(63-102)

79.8

±

9.98 (66.6-98.1)

Hematocrit

0.47

±

0.02

0.46

± 0.02

(0.43-0.49)

153 ± 7.0(140-168)

results aged

informed

of the 20-59

examiy,

of the

12 of

subjects

of the participants

Radioisotope Medical

Committee Faculty

assessment ferritin,

serum

I 2)

of the

of hemoglobin

total-iron-binding

ca-

high-density-lipoprotein insulin.

cholesterol, serum

serum bilirubin,

All subjects

183±6.5(174-196) ±

transferrmn

the

included serum

donors

2.43

of an

erythrocyte were

of the

low-density-lipoprotein serum glucose. serum

2.6(2()-31.8)

elevated

examinations

cholesterol,

±

developed signs

of subjects

hematocrit,

I80±5.5(l70-188)

the

he to a

of serum results from they

subjects

was

23.4 (gIL)

nine

of the

of a mod-

carbohydrate-deficient

These sample

concentration,

19)

an

final

BMI (kg/ni2) Hemoglobin

high

assessment

cholesterol, tniacylglycerols,

Chalmers

Nondonors

and

because

of laboratory

inflammation,

and by the Ethical Committee University of Goteborg.

METHODS

Hospital,

or

to select

one because he admitted

three

because

involved

a history

of an infection

two

and the results of the screening are given in Table 1. The project was approved

Subjects

University

work

including

were

of them

screening

and high concentrations because of abnormal

because

and

concentrations.

Laboratory SUBJECTS

one

study.

infection

(CDT)

form of iron. Attempts were also made to examine the of different methods to calculate heme-iron absorption

from various indicators relation between heme-iron

the

sedimentation

between

a highly

extensive

of alcohol,

Donor

They

number

a laboratory history.

of alcohol one

tests,

before

ongoing

iron-replete

relation

and

iron

as a result

a limited

and

Blood

(,i

=

29.4

±

10.8

77.2

±

9.6(63-102)

(20-59)

I8l ±6.1(170-196)

2.7(20.9-28.7 (0.43-0.5

1)

151 ± 9.9(133-169)

23.7

±

0.47

± 0.02

2.6 (20-31.8) (0.43-0.51)

152 ± 8.2 (133-169)

I9.9 33

±

4.4 (12.5-29.5)

±

5.4 ( 12.5-29) 9.2 (20.5-52.5)

20.4

±

3.7 ( 15-29.5) 5.8 (24-45.5)

±

34

33.4

±

7.2 (20.5-52.5)

Serum ferritin (j.tgIL) Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h) CDT (U/L) Serum cholesterol (mmol/L) Serum triacylglycerol (mmolfL) Serum LDL cholesterol (mmolfL) Serumii HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) Serum ALAT (MkatIL)

91.0 2.9

±

36.9

36.8

±

15.82

70.0

± 40.3

±

1.9(1-9)

±

4.1 (1.5-16)

15.9

± 4.0(9.6-23.3)

l6.4

± 4.7

(I 1.7-27.7)

16.0

± 4.2(9.6-27.7)

4.81 1.06 3.02 1.38 0.40

±

0.95

(3.1-7.1)

4.75

±

0.67

(0.67-3.1)

4.78

±

±

0.44

(0.49-1.9)

1.20

±

0.67

(0.67-3.1

1.10

±

0.54(0.49-3.1)

±

I.0(l.3-5.6)

3.00

+

0.60(2-3.8)

3.Ol

±

0.84(1.3-5.6)

±

0.23

( I . I-I .9) 0.1 1 (0.27-0.69)

1.25

±

0.20

±

0.44

±

0.14 (0.24-0.69)

0.41

±

Serum

0.38

±

0.13

0.35

±

0.07

0.37

± 0.1 1 (0.26-0.85)

2.65

± 0.49(l.55-4.l5)

Seruni

iron

(niol/L)

Transferrin

20.6

saturation

ASAT

(‘Ye)

(kat/L)

±

(44-176)

4.3

(0.27-4)85)

Serum

ALP

(katIL)

2.75

± 0.44(2-4.15)

Seruni Serum Serum

bilirubin (j.tmoIIL) y-glutamyltransferase insulin (mUlL)

13.5 0.33 9.22

±

5.8 (6.3-33.5)

16.8

±

±

0.15

0.37

± 0.13

±

2.55(3.5-26.3)

7.18

±

4.l4

±

0.76

4.29

±

a-glucose ‘

(MkatJL)

(mmol/L)

.t ± SD: range

amiiinotransf erase. 2 Significantly

in parentheses. different

from

CDT.

carbohydrate

nondonors.

P




Note that (70 jtg/L)

value and

in this

concentrations

jtgfL).

Estimates

351

a “tail”

ferritin

0.0001)




(P

absorb the same same iron status.

FIGURE serum

the same y

lines for absorption

the

t test).

This

amounts

of

of the

In studies status

method

of dietary on the

used

iron

lines was

means

iron

that

from

the

agreement

was

weight

iron

to be able

absorption

to relate

the

in validating iron statuses

and

iron

absorption

not

a certain period to individual

the method and to study on iron absorption and

the iron

balance. The

finding

(0.98

mg)

basal

iron

served iron

was

the

not

significantly

requirement

as blood balance.

that

mean

( 1 .06 mg)

donors, implies

total

and that

the

who

amount

of

different

from

in those

19 men

may

present

iron

absorbed

the

calculated

be considered method

not

significantly

who

had

to measure

the

total amount of iron absorbed from the diet over several days is valid. This result is consistent with observations in the two previous studies ( 10. 1 1 ) in menstruating women when the same method was used to measure iron absorption. Good

of

extrinsic

labeling

Validity

of selection selection

normal

ing

different

nor

were

the

the

(eg,

the

total

daily

amount

are

thus

the

three

separate

present method diet over several

of all meals

to the

same

to

subjects

same

smoking

with

was greatly

range

and

absorption, the

distributions uration

study

made

were

iron using

to obtain

varying

as seen

iron

activity.

alcohol

within

who

had

normal

to

blood

seen

in Table

and

limits

influence

of serum se is known

donated

concentrations

There-

conducted to or lifestyle

known

As

and

of

extend-

women.

were disorder

abuse)

excluded.

a sample

statuses.

in healthy

examinations have had any

those were

of hemoglobin values

illus-

of subjects

and laboratory who might

iron

studies measure days by

specific

iron-status indexes, especially the concentration ritin. Because increased erythropoiesis per before

of iron

individual daily iron requirements. from individual measurements of basal iron losses calculated from

whole

men

to about

factor

the

of

healthy

fore, clinical exclude those

mo

to be in

validity from

increase not

between

(1 1 ). There

the

The

between

just to a single meal but to the whole diet over of time. It is then possible to relate the absorption iron requirements effects of different

daily

found

absorption

absorbed

relation

it is advantageous

total

were

absorbed from the diet and The latter was calculated menstrual iron losses and body

to measure

slopes

(1 test).

relations were very

DISCUSSION Validity

The

(.tgIL)

total iron absorbed in 20 men with a log I .9 ,,tg/L and in 2 1 women who were served study ( I I ). The regression line fir the men was 0.46)andforthewomenwasv = 0.152 0.078x

in another

0.687).

,.2

ferritin




(P

Log

the iron

70 p.g/L were included in the comparrange of serum ferritin values was used in

v intercepts

and women diet at the

when

relation

men and women. As shown in Figure 3. the regression between log serum ferritin and total iron similar in men and were not significantly

value

Therefore,

the

ferritin,

0

ferritin

femtin

and

0. 0 Cl)

with serum

,.Lg/L)

0

.0

stores. In the sample of 2 1 women used in the comparison men the highest serum ferritin value was 70 gfL (log I .85

C

the Be-

C

discussed high

E

absorption

are compared and

a)

Total

recalculated to make directly comparable.

absorption

0)

Therefore. in women

in the

women

0

.0

ferto

in the 2 1 , the

transferrin not

sat-

significantly

different between blood donors and nondonors. It is also of interest that mean percentage nonheme-iron absorption values were not significantly different (P > 0. 1 ) between the blood donors and the sample of women served in the comparison of men and women

the same Thus,

( 1 1 ).

diet and used in the present

Downloaded from www.ajcn.org by guest on July 13, 2011

“tail”

men

#{149}0

than

previous

veal.

cause men and women differ in body weight, was calculated per kilogram body weight.

‘a)

percent-

higher

absorption

used

of

used in the measurefor

previously. only

refer-

prediction

I 2%

±

realistic

of log

values

28.4

used

use

therefore absorption

gave

were

the equation

same

absorption

a better

=

AL

and log direct

under

the

0.72) and was no direct heme-iron (r

comparison

the

based

from

present

men

nonheme-iron

in 23 subjects

equation,

absorption

derived

and

made

(see

made.

heme-iron

were

new

absorption

heme-iron absorption In the present studies

heme-

meals

dose

age

between only 0.36.

ET

REGULATION analyses

of relations

status and

in men nondonors

mentioned was

relation normal

iron

reexamination of serum

lation

coefficient

The

ferritin

to 250

of only

iron

serum

studies

between ferritin

( 1-9).

iron

measure-

In a study

on the

clinical data for 50 subjects, was 0.60 (4). This material, both iron deficiency values up to 5000 data

showed

p.g/L

of

evidence

that

produced

of

the

amount

and iron j.gfL. A

limiting

the

a squared

that

of

high

corre-

serum

stored

amounts

ferritin

iron:

bow

indicate

is a

amounts

states

of

evidence

iron

higher amounts than women. Morethe content of nonheme iron in the ferritin has also been shown (4). On

a high

alcohol

intake.

of a relation

between

ferritin concentrations was ing the stores by quantitative

obtained in four phlebotomies

ing these results the squared serum ferritin concentration stores was only in serum ferritin

=0.5, was

stores

and

studies (22-25).

indicating that only related to variations

iron. All these data indicate variation in serum ferritin was

the

ferritin in Figure range of

70 pg/L

>

by measurBy pool-

tail.

the

was

reference

relation

also

between

examined

dose

a straight dietary iron

the

measure

r

of was The

0.832. This seen in iron-

=

range

a good

of

line relation absorption.

4

is not

by

instead

as an independent

coefficient was high. serum ferritin in the

that

and

the

status

measure

of their

iron

stores.

ferritin

was

amounts

two

considerable,

of stored

clinical an

36%

study

iron

stores

60-70 to meet

further

accumulation by absorption serum ferritin this

to other men

measured

by

liver

range

was

phlebotomies

>

(26).

ferritin

correlation

that

In

concentration

in serum no

in body

(>

60-70

from

seen

and

in normal I .8 j.g/L

serum subjects (serum

was within the range which means that a iron

than

g/L)

the diet

factors

higher

iron

ferritin.

stores

will

not

of iron from the diet. Consequently. values observed in the iron-replete

derived

unknown

with

men

to predict

of serum

in

healthy

of iron

critical stores

variation

serum ferritin and variation in serum

it difficult

iron absorption iron requirements.

/.Lg/L).

basal

place

iron

making

concentrations

(24). in the present study ferritin concentration

>

high

between that the

of the variation

in

ferritin concentration It was obvious with a log serum femtin

from the

for only

needed

in turn

iron

studies

earlier

between

high

serum

correlation coefficient between and amounts of mobilizable

from

shown whole

correlation suggests

above iron

of

iron

of serum As the

men

cause

and

(see normal

were

not

take the men

due

to the

but were

probably

related

This

suggests

that

below). serum

ferritin

in

concentrations.

the iron

50% of the variation in amounts of stored

that a considerable part of the not related to the size of the iron

stores. In our previous studies seen between total daily serum with

ferritin. serum

The

values

(Figure

1 ). The

present food

data iron

in the

in the present

70

relating

tg/L. no

normal,

sample in the vey

the

frequency

reference

dose ferritin

seen

absorption (data

of serum

>

ferritin

(NHANES

ipate

in the

and

laboratory we

II) that

in

the

9 of the

present

study

United 40

men

were

examinations.

tried

to

exclude

States

instead

in the

excluded In the

those

after 3 1 men

men

who

careful selected might

C 0

of

>,

a 0

who Note

‘D

a

present

0

I-.

of men Sur-

It should

invited

a

here).

in women, 70 p.gfL.

(12).

originally

0 Cl)

.0

thus in the

not given

studies values

‘O 0 .0

noted

men

also

a) E

serum

was

of men was the same as in the extensive sample second National Health and Nutrition Examination

remembered

study

was

‘O

in men

with

relation

tail

to log serum

distribution

studies

men

iron-replete

A similar

Such a tail was not seen in the previous on the other hand had no serum ferritin that

In

however,

in these graph.

absorption

significant relations were of iron absorbed and log

seen

j.g/L,

results

by

was

values 70

>

a tail

formed

same

ferritin

femtin

in women, amounts

be

to particclinical for have

the had Absorption

elevated concentrations smoking, liver disease, ing the month preceding

of serum ferritin due to alcohol intake, mild diabetes, and mild infections durthe study. Therefore, the probability is

sorption

bow

due

0.606

that

influencing

the

tail serum

was ferritin.

to

any

known

pathologic

factor

FIGURE

4. Relation from

(p.2

requirements.

=

reference 0.832).

from

between doses

The

total

reference dietary

doses iron

(%)

absorbed

The regression line was y horizontal line indicates mean (x.

(v)

and 0.079x

basal

ab-

iron

Downloaded from www.ajcn.org by guest on July 13, 2011

with

Direct

status. over

replete

the

absorption absorption

accounted

hand it is also well-known that increased and often serum ferritin values are seen in inflammatory and disorders, in liver disease, in starvation, and in

association

the

squared finding

In suggests

deficiency,

examine

iron

iron seen

353

In a critical review of the relation amounts of stored iron it was shown

0.21.

overload, and men have over, a relation between bOne marrow and serum the other very high infectious

on

with ferritin

published

indicator

indicate

patients serum

of the

balance

good

dietary

concentration a relation

based

which used coefficient

ABSORPTION To further

iron

donors

log absorption and log serum ferritin in 47 the squared correlation coefficient was 0.67

included who had

range

and blood

stores

in several

(7). In another study, the squared correlation however, overload

absorption

IRON

using

Introduction

status,

observed

between subjects

iron

to combine

sample.

to iron

in the

and

ments,

present

in relation

absorption

dietary

it was justified

in the

Absorption As

between

we think

OF

HALLBERG

354 iron

stores

cannot

concentrations. known fact with

be estimated

This that high

a marked

accurately

from

conclusion does not serum ferritin values

pathologic

iron

amounts of stored iron from must be made with caution.

serum

contradict are seen

overload.

Thus,

concentrations

of serum

AL

5). This

ferritin

the wellin subjects

estimation

ET

of ferritin

effective.

that

a high

stores

in relation

status

between

men

observed

and

no

than

men

ments.

No good

data

that

women adaptation

are available

absorb more dietary iron to higher iron requireto support

However,

it is evident

from

the simple

that

men

and

women

absorb

about

the

same

diet

from

ologicably,

when

it is not

their

same

status

that

speculation.

comparison the

iron

astonishing

such

in Figure amount

is the

same.

the regulatory

3

of

iron

obvious

in dietary

in men iron

related

to

in

iron

established

of iron

stores.

(23. 27) conducted

content of was 280-92()

weight

55-453

mg.

reported

women

but

tions

in women

more

efficient

requirements.

are

iron

thus

status.

and

based

blood

than in men in men, with

mobilizable mg. The

the

in that

is

27-32). 79 subjects.

601

nig; average

excluded):

the mean

of iron

regulation

not

There The

of iron

The

higher

serum

absence compatible

in Australia reported

of

an is

in Australian of iron

in the

serum

Introduction,

reasons why iron stores in women are smaller than in men. Women are usually their iron balance varies during the fertile of menstruation and pregnancy.

by

higher

iron

meat in

on

serum

the

present

The

controlled.

the higher meat ferritin concen-

it is well-known

serum

ferritin

down-regulation partly study

ferritin

iron

of

that serum

iron

however,

absorption

has

not

of the lack of suitable ( 1 1 ) it was observed very

concentrations.

from whole low values

Four

bioavaibahibity

that

increases;

of iron because in women

that the total amounts of iron absorbed served over several days. decreased to different

explained

their

men.

when

been addressed directly. methods. In a previous

edly

been

well

in

concentra-

finding

also

signifi-

absorption

decreases of this

was

ferritin

have

it unlikely the higher

those

analysis.

concentrations

to meet the

absorption

intake

effect

with

make explains

mentioned

well

in order

thus

intake

As

Meat

ferritin

is

tration

absorption

found.

may

than

a careful

serum

The men

Despite

was

in men

populations,

higher

high

absorption

heme-iron

increasing

± I SD was

than

much

(33).

men.

iron

the efficacy

the mean value in

in

Australian

were

populations

findings

aver-

measurements.

(22-25, a total

iron was corresponding

that

with a total 1 8 subjects, was 254 with an iron store of 1054 mg and

of 1 1 1 kg were

There are obvious usually considerably smaller in size and age period because

on

studies

asymptomatic

with

requirements. study

differences

women

is also

a hypothesis

to an accumulation the strong

values

explanation

mechanisms

and

in several

women, from only two studies mg (results from one woman a body

often men

lead

by bypassing

ferritin

Regulation well

in women 10 studies

average ± I SD

The

between

might

absorption

do not support

were

studied.

20

25

diets

diets, with mark-

with

Iron

absorption

45

40

The

relative

role of heme-iron

absorption

on total

iron

absorption The

absorption

by iron

of both

status

but

Our findings kinds of iron

heme

the effect

and

nonheme

is more

marked

iron

is influenced

for nonheme

35

iron.

showed that the fractional absorption of the two was the same (=40%) in a state of iron depletion

corresponding to a serum ferritin concentration (Figure 2). At higher serum ferritin concentrations in iron absorption was more marked for nonheme

of 10 p.g/L the decrease iron. Our

findings are thus almost identical to those reported al (7); however. our data were based on the average

by Lynch absorption

from

the

whole

findings

are

greater subjects

part than

both

kinds

amount iron

mixed

of the total in iron-deficient of iron

of heme of

iron

requirements.

are

iron

in the present

amount

diet

over

5 d. The

important-heme-iron absorption subjects.

influenced

absorbed,

study

implications

absorption

by despite

( I .8 mg).

needed to he From a common

was

of

When we directly heme iron, there

absorption

with

0

0 Cl)

.0

a

C 0

et

form

25

E

of these may

30

0.

0

a

I

20

iron in iron-replete It is also evident that

iron

status

and

the high

intake

less

half

than

absorbed to Western-type

half the amount of heme iron than in the present values for absorption need to be correspondingly and

C

cover diet

that

the

of heme (45%)

15

the

basal iron with about 10

diet ( I .8 mg), reduced.

compared the absorption from nonheme was a rather steep decrease in heme-iron decreasing nonheme-iron absorption (Figure

5

10

15

Nonheme-iron FIGURE iron.

The

5.

Relation

regression

line

between was

v

absorption the

=

30

12

absorption +

19.71

X

(%) of

henie

logx

(r

and =

nonheme

0.63l.

Downloaded from www.ajcn.org by guest on July 13, 2011

amount

lower were

women.

differences

body size. It was also age

and

absorption

of heme-iron

findings

large

tWo

associated

ferritin

Physi-

of

in other

present

are the same

intake men

serum

cantly

suggested as a physiologic

these

absorption.

women

It has been

meat

In a study

to iron

the control

Thus.

in normal

median Absorption

that

means

very

REGULATION from

all

ments. stores.

diets

thus This

ability.

decreased

It was

ments

the

estimated

decrease

agrees

with

These

results

conclusion will not logic

below

in

the

that

iron

in women

in both

in

in the

women

iron

low

iron

in the

thus

by ab( I I).

the

study

same

stongly

normal iron-replete body above certain

the

subjects. iron upper physio-

limits.

mechanism

that

body.

will

prevent

In epidemiologic

ferritin

values

33).

In

observations there is an

accumulation

studies

peak

in

a carefully

the

it has been

third

designed

to

and studies that effective control

of excess

iron

observed

that

fourth

decade

in

iron-fortification

was given

improve

bioavailability

dietary

the

iron

in iron-replete man, 10 mg

replete main

meals

noted with

500

d with

lating

example

iron

of the

absorption

(37) States

The

capacity

is from

of

NHANES

significantly the

serum

in serum

same

was

no

mechanisms

II. there

was

ferritin

the

mechanism

necropsy

studies

increase

in was in I 8

factors

a shift

skewness

States.

present

finding iron

in only

related

to age

concentration higher

that

absorption

are

less

risk

subjects.

for

Because

iron

iron

understanding understanding illustrated tive, high

iron

overload

cannot

there and

valid

observed or moderate

to detect in iron-replete results ( 1 1 ). In addition, will

be regulated

nonheme iron

in the same

iron. would

in otherwise

be actively

Thus. there constitute a

normal

secreted

from

that

for

of our environment humans (4 1 ) make

survival.

both

developed

effective

control

deficiency

and

overload.

iron

control

of

iron

in

in iron-replete

and the

of the regulation of iron absorption iron metabolism and iron balance. This in a recent review (40). From a teleobogic

the high iron content iron intake by early

is an that

the same from is that studies of

differences in bioavailability or in subjects with small

of fortification

replete

confirmed

that

absorption is about iron bioavailability

absorption

marked subjects

special

humans

and

mechanisms The

absorption

is

body.

an

is key to was well perspec-

and the assumed it reasonable to animals

must

to prevent

present

iron-

finding

have

both

iron

of an effec-

compatible

with

this

the

distribu-

serum

this that

ferritin

and

on a statistical

elevated morbidity

(based

there was is important

serum ferritin in coronary

in that

study

was

with

a high

indirect must

A,

subjects

for

that

the

mod-

(> 200 p.gfL) in men (39). The

amount

of stored

iron

is a risk for coronary such a relation must

artery disease. However, the causality of be seriously questioned on the basis of the

present

that

conclusion: should

not

moderately be translated

elevated into

concentrations higher

iron

F. Worwood

patients

with

of stores.

M.

iron

Ferritimi

deficiency

in the

and

seruni

of

iron

overload.

CA.

Serum

normal

Br Med

J

1972:4:206-8.

JD, Lipschitz of

DA, Miles

iron

stores

in

I 974:27:681-7. 3. Heinrich I-IC. BrUggemann isian.

4.

diagnostic

Fe2

Z Naturtorsch

Bezwoda

tween

W.

Bothwell

marrow

iron

Scand

LEM.

Finch

normal

subjects.

J. Gabbe

-absorption CI

Am

EE. Glaser

and

serum

as a

krritin

J

Clin

Nutr

M. Correlation

ferritin

concentration

et al. The

relationship

bein

1977:32:1023-5. TH.

stores.

Torrance

JD.

plasma

ferritin

J Haematol

I 979:22:

concentrations

be-

and

iron

I I 3-20.

5. Baynes RD. Bothwell TH, Bezwoda WR, MacPhail AP. Derniami Relationship between absorption of inorganic and food iron in studies. Ann Nutr Metab l987:31:l()9-l6. 6. Taylor P. Martinez-Torres C. Leets I. Ramirez J. Garcia-Casal Layrisse M. Relationships among iron absorption. percent saturation plasma transferrin and serum ferritin concentration in humans. J 7. Lynch

DP. field MN. of Nutr

SR. Skikne

BS. Cook JD. Food iron absorption in idiopathic I 989:74:2187-93. 8. Hallberg L. 1-lult#{233}nL. Bengtsson C. Lapidus L. Lindstedt G. Iron balance in menstruating women. Eur J Clin Nutr l995:49:2(X)-7. 9. Magnusson B. BjUrn-Rasmussen E. Uallberg L. Rossander L. Iron hemochromatosis.

an effective downin the evaluation of relation):

Miller

and

1988:1 18:1 1 1(1-S.

be

an increase

responsible

concentrations artery disease that

effective

the there

are associated

of serum values.

hypothesis

all

conclusion.

a recent

ferritin

I . Jacobs

absorption.

ferritin

is an

and

that

conclusion

U

REFERENCES

II

men but also in slightly changed

there

absorption

The present conclusion regulation of iron absorption

serum

iron

finding

iron

way as all other dietary be no reason why fortification

tween

In the

of the

higher

y. especially values were

reported

ie, at about

United

toward

of

NHANES

1980,

in the

an increased

of 20 median

extensive

in 1 976-

study

sample

the variation

the

in

supporting

toward

erately increase

effective would

2. Cok

in liver

in the present

from

made

with

of

mentioned

in the

influencing

been

of our for

subjects iron greatly varying

not

regu-

in liver samples 3983 subjects

further

noted

age

was

necropsy

Considering

other

implication

have

iron stores will be hard or impossible subjects and will thus give misleading

tive

age.

evidence

study

mechanism

subjects. Even in iron-deficient

assume

in an ironinto one of

increase

iron from

different

survey

after the age Despite this,

control

shift

on

study mixed

extensive

storage data

ferritin

as the

of serum

values women.

in serum

latter

time

with

effect

no

of the

two

30 y, there

about

( I 2). This same

iron-replete diets with

measure

not

men

tion

of

variation was

control

and the other study data from 277 subjects in the (38). The main result in both studies was that

the age stores.

men

had

In a recent sulfate was

no significant

which the content of nonheme measured. One study presented countries United

effective

Finnish

perspective.

Another

after iron

for no

in men (34). High doses of the main meals for 2 y to

men (35). Fe as ferrous

ftr

iron daily whereas

this

studies. important

( I 2,

in which

(36).

ferritin

from

by other Another

Blood

absorption

in relation

of

iron

food

to iron

status.

absorption

Model

proposed

measurements.

to express

Scand

J

results Haematol

1981:27:201-8.

10. Gleerup absorption differemit

A. Rossander-Flult#{233}n L. Gramatkovski from the whole diet: comparison distributions

of

daily

calcium

intake.

of

E. Hallberg the effect Am

L. Iron two

of

J Clin

Nutr

1995:61:97-104.

I I . Hult#{233}n L. Gramatkovski E, Gleerup A. Hallberg from the whole diet. Relation to meal composition, and iron stores. Eur J Climi Nutr 1995:49:794-808.

L. Iron iron

absorption requirements

Downloaded from www.ajcn.org by guest on July 13, 2011

effect on serum ferritin ascorbic acid (2 g/d)

in the serum

men

trial

subjects were given 7.5 mg highly available extra 2 y, iron status in women improved significantly

ferritin

findings

355

the absorption independent in normal subjects

that

suggest

ABSORPTION

factors

diet.

support

IRON The

require-

present

served

men

There are several

in

require-

be attained 4-500 mg

men

women

and

that in otherwise accumulate in the

with might be

absorption

findings

basal

of any further increase in iron a diet with high iron bioavail-

maximal iron stores that of iron f’rom the diet would

sorption The

to values

implying a cessation was also true for

OF

356

HALLBERG

I 2. Pilch SM, Senti FRE. Assessment of the iron nutritional status of the US population based on data collected in the second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. 1976-1980. Bethesda, MD: Life Sciences

Research

perimental

I 3. Deneke

Federation

G, Beutler

in

Societies

for

Ex-

HO. Neue Methode zur Bestimmung von (New method for determination of vita-

C in Lebensmitteln.

C

of American

1984.

U, Michal

Vitamin mm

Office,

Biology.

food-stuffs.)

Deutsche

Lebensmittel-Rundschau

1978:74:

400-3 (in German). 14. Hallberg L. Food iron absorption. In: Cook JD. ed. Methods in hematology. London: Churchill. 1980:116-33. I 5. Hallgren B. Determination of non-haem iron in tissues. Acta Soc Med Ups 1953:59:84-99. I 6. Harland BF, Oberleas D. Anion-exchange method for determination of phytate in foods: collaborative study. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 1986:69:667-70. 17.

Eakins

JD,

Brown

determination

DA.

of iron-55

counting.

An

Int J AppI Radiat

I 8. BjOrn-Rasmussen Svanberg B.

E, Arvidsson

improved

method

iron-59

in blood

and

for by

the

simultaneous

liquid

scintillation

Hallberg L. Magnusson B. Measurement of

B. iron

Rossander absorption

2 1 . Martinez-Torres

C,

Am

iron

absorption.

Philadelphia: 26.

Brittenham

J Med

Layrisse

Iron

ED.

& Stratton.

Danish

EH,

Balcerzak

absorption

Ballot

ed.

Proteins

veal

35.

muscle.

of iron

36. Sayers

JW.

Assessment

MH,

37. Charlton age 38.

marrow

Heinle

EW,

Taylor

FH.

Measurement

MacPhail

AP.

Bothwell

TH,

Gillooly

M.

Mayet

FG.

English iron

G, Finch

balance.

RW, Hawkins

concentrations

CA.

Am

Capacity

J Hematol

DM, Mayor

in different

of the

store-regulator

in

1994:47:194-7.

WO, Bothwell

population

TH. Hepatic

groups.

Am

J Clin

storNutr

Sturgeon

P. Shoden

A. Total

liver

storage

iron

in normal

populations

of the USA. Am J Clin Nutr 1971:24:469-74. 39. Salonen JT. Nyyssonen K. Korpela H. Tuomilehto J. Seppanen R. Salonen R. High stored iron levels are associated with excess risk of myocardial

infarction

in

eastern

Regulators

of

iron

Finnish

men.

Circulation

1992:

86:803-Il.

40. Finch

C.

balance

in

humans.

Blood

1994;

84:1697-702.

41 of bone

MP.

1970:23:358-71.

metabolism.

1977:387-92.

Harris

DE,

maintaining from

Westerman

as

Fortification of curry powder with NaFe(l I l)EDTA in an iron-deftcient population: report of a controlled iron-fortification trial. Am J Clin Nutr 1989;49:162-9. Cook J. Watsson SS, Simpson KM. Lipschitz DA, Skikne BS. The effect of high ascorbic acid supplementation on body iron stores. Blood 1984:64:721-6.

L. from

A

SP,

in man

of iron stores using desferrioxamine. Ann Intern Med 1968:68:518-25. 31 . Conrad ME, Crosby WH. The natural history of iron deficiency induced by phlebotomy. Blood 1962:20:173-85. 32. Olsson KS. Iron stores in normal men and male blood donors. Acta Med Scand 1972:192:401-7. 33. Leggett BA, Brown NN. Bryant SJ. Duplock L, Powell LW, Halliday JW. Factors affecting the concentrations of femtin in serum in a healthy Australian population. Clin Chem 1990:36:1350-5.

1968:45:336-53. M.

In: Brown

Grune GM.

30.

34.

Am J Clin Nutr 1971:24:531-40. 22. Walters GO, Miller FM. Worwood M. Serum ferritin concentration and iron stores in normal subjects. J Clin Pathol 1973:26:770-2. 23. Skikne BS, Flowers CH. Cook JD. Serum transferrin receptor: a quantitative measure of tissue iron deficiency. Blood 1990:75:1870-6. 24. Birgeg#{226}rdG. Hogman C. Killander A. Levander H, Simonsson B. Wide L. Serum femtin and 2.3-DPG during quantitative phlebotomy and iron treatment. Scand J Haematol 1977:19:327-33. 25. Charlton RW, Derman D, Skikne B. et al. Iron stores, serum ferritin and

1949:2:99-102.

29. Haskins D, Stevens AR, Finch S. Finch CA. Iron stores measured by phlebotomy. J Clin Invest 1952:31:543-7.

.

Eaton SB, Konner M. Paleolithic nutrition: a consideration and current implications. N EngI J Med 1985:312:283-9.

of its nature

Downloaded from www.ajcn.org by guest on July 13, 2011

study.

AL

and body iron stores: old techniques and new technologies. Semin Hematol 1981:18:194-221. 27. Pritchard JA, Mason RA. iron stores of nprmal adults and replenishment with oral iron therapy. J Am Med Assoc 1964:190:897-901. 28. Hynes M. The iron reserve of a normal man. J Clin Pathol

Isot 1966:17:391-7.

composite meals. Am J Clin Nutr 1976:29:772-8. 19. Hallberg L, Rossander-Hult#{233}n L. Iron requirements in menstruating women. Am J Clin Nutr 1991:54:1047-58. 20. Green R, Charlton RW, Seftel H. et al. Body iron excretion in man. collaborative

ET

Suggest Documents