Injecting drug users and HCV infection : prevention strategies and results

Injecting drug users and HCV infection : prevention strategies and results Damien Lucidarme M.D. Hôpital saint Philibert, Lomme, France Introductio...
Author: Esmond Owens
0 downloads 4 Views 481KB Size
Injecting drug users and HCV infection : prevention strategies and results

Damien Lucidarme M.D. Hôpital saint Philibert, Lomme, France

Introduction Intravenous drug use has become the principal route of HCV transmission Prevalence reported from Europe, the USA and Australia are usually high : 50 % -> 90 %

Prevalence of HCV markers according to the duration of IV drug use in 1991 in Lille 100

90

80 62

60

%

40

90

66

33

20 0

0-6

0-12

'12-24

24-36

>36 mois

DURATION OF INTRAVENOUS DRUG USE

Contamination by HCV was almost inevitable after 2 years of intravenous drug use Lucidarme et al. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1994

Introduction In order to prevent HIV and HCV transmission among IDUs, in 1993 the French health authorities implemented a national riskreduction program based on : 1) easy access to syringes, 2) opiate substitution, 3) screening for HIV and HCV and counselling

1) easy access to syringes :

Evolution of the number of organizations and of funding dedicated to the risk-reduction policy

Organizations

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

Syringe-exchangeprogrammes

86

88

100

102

106

Storefronts

32

32

34

36

42

Automated devices

150

200

220

250

272

Total number

268

320

354

388

420

66 MF

79 MF

Funds

86 MF 92 MF 94 MF

Labrosse-Solier N. Journée nationale de l’échange des seringues en pharmacie. Lyon 2001

2) opiate substitution Accessibility of IVDUs to substitution treatment from 1995 to 2003 (Siamois, InVS) 100 000 80 000 60 000 40 000 20 000 0 1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

Average number of monthly users of Méthadone Average number of monthly users of Subutex

2003

3) screening for HIV and HCV Frequency of recent detection (past 20 months) of hepatitis C according to age among the users of lowthreshold organizations

2001

2002

2003

15-24 years

37 %

33 %

49 %

25-35 years

50 %

53 %

66 %

> 35 years

48 %

58 %

72 %

Total

46 %

50 %

63 %

Conférence de Consensus : Place des traitements de substitution. Lyon 2004

Does this policy work ?

Evolution of access to substitution treatment and of deaths by overdose from 1995 to 2003 (Siamois, InVS) UD under Deaths bu overdose

substitution 100000

500

90000

450

80000

400

70000

350

60000

300

50000

250

40000

200

30000

150

20000

100

10000

50

0

0 1995

1 996

1 997

1 998

1 999

UD under substitution

2 000

2 001

2 002

2003

Deaths by overdose

Dr. J.Emmanuelli / InVS

Progress of access to substitution treatment and sterile syringes from 1995 to 2003 (Siamois, InVS) Syringes

IVDU

20 000 000

100 000

18 000 000

90 000

16 000 000

80 000

14 000 000

70 000

12 000 000

60 000

10 000 000

50 000

8 000 000

40 000

6 000 000

30 000

4 000 000

20 000

2 000 000

10 000

0

0 1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

UDIV under substitution

2000

2001

2002

2003

syringes Dr. J.Emmanuelli / InVS

Indicators of infection in IVDUs from 1988 to 2002 : stated prevalence of HIV and HCV

IREP CESES HIV DREES PES 0FDT IREP CESES HCV DREES PES AIDES

1988

1991

1996

40%

34%

20% 14% 23%

COQUELICOT Emmanuelli J et al. BEH 2003

1998

1999

2002

14% 19% 10%

47% 60% 66%

63% 58% 53% 51%

Comments HCV prevalence = HCV incidence x duration of the illness (>10 years) => Prevalence reflects : long-term contamination and therefore ancient practices period prior to the rise of the risk-reduction policy

Prevalence is not a sensitive indicator of the course of the epidemic Incidence is a more sensitive indicator of the course of the epidemic

Incidence and risk factors of HCV and HIV infections in a prospective cohort of IVDU in the North and East of France* Between March 1999 and July 2001, we conducted, in closed partnership with InVS, a prospective cohort study of antibodies to HCV and HIV among IDUs negative for both viruses recruited in the North and East of France

*Lucidarme D, Bruandet A, Ilef D et al. Epidemiology and Infection 2004

Patients and methods The persons eligible were drug user attendees of 6 care centers in Northern and Eastern France : who had injected drugs at least once in their lifetime whose HCV serology was presumed to be negative

A blood sample for HCV and HIV tests was taken and a standard questionnaire on their drug habits and injecting practices was administered from all the participants at inclusion and at the end of the follow-up one year later

Results Of the 231 HCV-seronegative IDUs enrolled in the study, 3 (2%) died and 63 (27%) did not undergo a final serum test and were excluded from the analysis 165 participants (71.4%) underwent a final HCV serum test Among the 165 enrollees, 16 seroconverted for HCV during follow-up No HIV seroconversion was detected The crude incidence density rate for HCV infection is therefore 9.0 PY (95%CI: 4.57-13.4)

Incidence of HCV infection according to maintenance therapy P = NS

20

%

10,4

15 10

16,1

5,3

5 0

Méthadone (n=57)

Buprénorphine (n=77) Incidence of HCV

No maintenance therapy (n=31)

Comments The incidence of HCV infection remains rather high The still high proportion of sharing of injection and preparation equipment and continuance of regular injecting practices, perhaps favored by the use of cocaine and the risky nature of occasional and unplanned injections are among the most contributing factors Assuming that 40 000 active IVDUs are HCV negative we could speculate that 2 700-4 400 IVDUs are contaminated every year in France

Is HCV contamination of intravenous drug users really unavoidable ?

Prevalence of HCV markers in relation to the duration of intravenous drug use 100 80 60

%

40 20 0 0

2

4

6

8

10

France 1991

12

14

16

18

France 2001

20

What remains to be done ? 1- Prevent syringe use particularly among the youngest drug users 2- Continue the efforts of improvement of the accessibility of injection equipment aimed at preventing sharing and re-use behavior 3- Continue substitution policy but take into account its shortcomings 4- Reinforce screening of HCV infection in IVDUs particularly among those with poor veins and those who had never been tested 5- Reinforce acessibility of IVDUs to treatment

Conclusion We may conclude that the risk-reduction policy has had a significant but markedly insufficient impact on the hepatitis C epidemic in the drug-user population Much remains to be done in order to inflect the prevalence curve of the infection by 2011

Conclusion 100 80 60

%

40 20 0 0

2

4

France 1991

6

8

10

12

14

France 2001

16

18

20

France 2011 ?

Prevalence of HCV in relation to the duration of IV drug use

Thank you

Suggest Documents